Login | Contact Us | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic edition | Subscribe to the paper
Subscribe to RSS   Add to My Yahoo!

Campaign 2008

January 20, 2009 4:29 PM

A smooth transition, too positive for Bush-bashing

bushobama.jpg
Isn't it nice that we don't have power transfers like so many third-world nations that would just erupt into military revolts and rioting in the streets? In fact, this transfer of power was so smooth and congenial that I bet there's not a single "O" key missing from the computers in the White House. (Wink wink, nudge nudge, Bill staff...)

Now that Barack Obama is officially president of the United States, I hope Americans of all political stripes can acknowledge George W. Bush's hospitality toward the new first family. Some status updates that have come across my Facebook today have included one friend wanting to smack Bush across the face on the way out, another lauding the departure of the "Shrub" (please, that's so 2000), and, of course, the borderline conspiracy theory rumblings that Chief Justice John Roberts purposely flubbed Obama's oath as just another cog in the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy.

For those looking to get in their parting shots at the old president, why not just celebrate the new president instead? That would really be "change." You don't think that Bush has been beaten down enough, dodging shoes, aging exponentially in eight years, having Cindy Sheehan as a squatter next to his private home? Funny how anger still pervades what's supposed to be Hope (TM) and Change (TM) Day. Protesters are trying to figure out life post-Bush (note: they'll still be angry about something), but I sure hope they let the man retire in peace and don't initiate more Texas campouts. Enough already.

Here's some positives to go along with that positive vibe today: Bush's daughters penned this cute letter to Obama's daughters on life in the White House, published by WSJ. And speaking of WSJ, you'll enjoy James Taranto's comparison of Bush's second inaugural address and Obama's speech today. That is, if you didn't throw a fit at the picture I posted. 

November 16, 2008 10:04 PM

Change you can gag on

obamachange.jpg
OK, Obama, you've won the election. You're not electioneering anymore. You can freely admit that Joe Biden is the Antichange. It's like pulling off a Band-Aid to lighten up on the rhetoric and just reveal the real you, good or bad, instead of the campaign trail cult of personality. But if you do it quickly, it's a lot easier on everyone.

That "Office of the President Elect" sign is cheese enough, but now Obama has nabbed the site "change.gov" as his transition portal. There you can learn about "The Administration" that's not yet the administration, and submit "your inspiring stories from the campaign and Election Day." Which loosely translates to, "We want to hear how you walked three miles in bare feet chanting Obama's name while drawing onetime McCain voters behind you like the Pied Piper, so that when the honeymoon period is over we can have something to read to plump our egos."

In other important American news, Obama will not be getting a puppy before moving into the White House. Because it makes perfect sense to potty train a pup in America's most valuable historic landmark.

November 12, 2008 2:17 PM

Yes, Sarah, you were to blame, too

sarahpalin.jpgSo was the economic meltdown, so were the debate performances, so was the Obama campaign keeping a short leash on foot-in-mouth maestro Joe Biden, so was John McCain's transformation from maverick moderate at the beginning of campaign season into whatever he is today, so was the markedly favorable news coverage for Barack.

It's easy to sit there and blame Bush, as has been the national pastime for many years now. And yet McCain -- who, yes, at one time was really "mavericky" -- had a real shot at the White House, buoyed by independents who had long liked him and Democrats who at least respected him, until his handlers went in search of the conservative base. Sarah Palin was  a spur of the moment pick intended to woo the right (though GOP voter turnout reportedly dropped) and make Hillary supporters seethe at Obama in one fell swoop. And that euphoria lasted in the polls until mid-September; by the end of that month, according to a series of Washington Post-ABC News polls, confidence in Palin's ability to slip into the Oval Office chair if needing be was seriously dragging and Joe Biden was getting higher favorability ratings. Biden! I know Dems who practically hit their heads against the wall when a) Biden ran for the nomination again and b) Obama picked him as his running mate.

Sure, Palin ranked high on the down-to-earth personality scale, but in times of crisis  -- economy, war, nuclear Iran, out-of-control Pakistan -- voters were going to jump at highly substantive answers, not just primo photo ops at the United Nations tutorials.

Were McCain's jokes on "Saturday Night Live" the weekend before the election -- you know, the skit with Tina Fey where "Sarah" referred to her 2012 ambitions -- actually jokes? For a presidential candidate to be in on a joke about his VP nominee undermining his own campaign ... well, it was pretty big. Did Palin want to see this ticket through, or did she decide to try to emerge from the contest with as little damage as possible to map a presidential run in four years? Palin said in the blitz of media attention this week that "if there is an open door in '12 or four years later, and if it is something that is going to be good for my family, for my state, for my nation, an opportunity for me, then I'll plow through that door." And I'll blame others for '08.

Simply put, Palin shares blame for the McCain loss. You can't blame the media for every hard question, and you can't wag your finger at "some blogger probably sitting there in their parents' basement wearing their pajamas, blogging" if you understand that elections will now be fought and won in the new online media. (Did she a) learn from Dan Rather's faux pas or b) pause to consider how bloggers helped as well as hurt her campaign?) And all in all, the GOP can't dwell on it, but can learn from the past to adequately look forward to the future.

 

Add to Technorati Favorites

November 7, 2008 3:42 PM

The Rahm Emanuel hot-headed double standard

Obama.JPGCall him a pit bull without lipstick -- or just check out these media characterizations of Barack Obama's new chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel. First, from Time:

"Instead, you bring in a guy like Emanuel, the most hard-headed, no-nonsense, foul-mouthed, smart-as-hell, get-it-done-or-get-out-of-my-way Washington insider of his generation. And you put him in charge of a White House staff whose task it is -- and this is putting it conservatively -- to conceive, propose, promote and somehow push through Congress the most ambitious agenda any President has carried forth at least since Ronald Reagan rode into town with a lopsided grin in January 1981. 'Rahm does not sing Kumbaya,' laughs an old friend and colleague. 'He barks orders.' His hometown paper, the Chicago Tribune, calls Emanuel 'a brutally effective taskmaster.'"

Or from Nina Easton at Fortune:

"Rahm Emanuel, the Chicago Congressman who will be President-elect Barack Obama's White House chief of staff, is 'dangerous, absolutely relentless when he's got a political kill in sight,' according to an admiring Republican colleague, Oklahoma Congressman Tom Cole. Emanuel is also, President Clinton once told Fortune, 'one of the top political minds in Washington,' a former ballet dancer who 'favors the counterattack over the attack.'"

Or the Chicago Sun-Times:

"With Emanuel, Obama gets an enforcer, a bad cop who loves the f-word, with a unique resume no one else in the United States can match ... If Obama is reserved Mr. Cool, Emanuel is emotive Mr. Hot."

OK, so let's make sure we have this straight:

  • John McCain was branded a hot-headed cranky temperamental old guy. Rahm Emanuel is "emotive."
  • Karl Rove was dubbed "Bush's evil genius" and a wicked puppetmaster. Rahm Emanuel is "a brutally effective taskmaster."
  • Newt Gingrich was once named Saturday Night Live's "Pr*ck of the Week." Rahm Emanuel is "the most hard-headed, no-nonsense, foul-mouthed, smart-as-hell, get-it-done-or-get-out-of-my-way Washington insider of his generation."
  • Dick Cheney was characterized as being unhinged and/or rude and/or un-vice presidential for dropping the F-bomb on Patrick Leahy. Rahm Emanuel is "an enforcer, a bad cop who loves the f-word, with a unique resume no one else in the United States can match."
Got it?

Add to Technorati Favorites

November 7, 2008 1:30 PM

Not the company I'd like my mug to keep

83570945.jpg
A Palestinian shopkeeper in Gaza sells Obama mugs alongside those of Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh and PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat. I've got one thought about the shopkeeper (and sing along, now): He's got ... high hopes!

Add to Technorati Favorites

November 7, 2008 12:02 PM

Harry Reid has no right to 'punish' Joe Lieberman

Lieberman Democrats.JPG
Here's the long and the short of it: Eight years ago, "Honest Joe" Lieberman was the vice presidential nominee for the Democratic Party, having served as Connecticut's junior senator since 1989. In 2004, he unsuccessfully vied for the Democratic presidential nod; former running mate Al Gore had already dissed him by this time. In 2006, Ned Lamont, running on an anti-war platform, defeated Lieberman in the Democratic Senate primary. Lieberman ran as an independent, and won the general election. Ever since, Dems have generally branded Joe a traitor and Satan, even though he caucuses with Democrats and sides with them on most issues -- and even though he won election as an independent!

Yet since he hit the campaign trail for his BFF John McCain -- bearing in mind that there's still a big "I" after his name, not "D" -- and spoke at the RNC (which was a speech all about bipartisanship), he's had a ginormous target on his back with Harry Reid aiming the crossbow.

If Reid and the DNC want to shun Lieberman, fine. It's their loss. If they never invite Joe to another D.C. tea party, fine. Whine and complain about what a goober you think he is.

But to oust an experienced senator committed to national defense as chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee is petty partisanship at its worst. The commitment to homeland security should know no party, and just requires the best minds on the issue. Obviously Reid and Co. thought Lieberman to be highly qualified for the post based on his experience and merit. Because he tried to help a friend win the White House, that somehow now makes him unqualified for the post? It doesn't. It's just a majority leader thinking that he has the right to "punish" an independent, and puts the best interests of the public second.

Especially when Reid's candidate won the presidential election, it only looks as if he's trying to throw his power around. The Dems also don't need Joe to hold a Senate majority anymore, so they're content with tossing him out in the cold.

Very sad. I wish independent thinking was cherished more in D.C. Brave steps could be taken and things might actually start getting done. "It shouldn't take a natural disaster to teach us that the American people don't care much if you have an 'R' or a 'D' after your name," Lieberman said in his RNC speech. "What they care about is, are we solving the problems they are up against every day?" Well, D.C. does care about the R or D, and they don't get things done, so go figure.



Add to Technorati Favorites

November 6, 2008 12:21 PM

Bobby Jindal in 2012?

jindal.jpgYou know you're somebody when a Facebook fan page is created in your honor -- and you know you're on the minds of voters when membership jumps after one's party just got thrashed on Election Day. It's the Bobby Jindal in 2012 movement, kicking into gear and on the lips of pundits just two days after Barack Obama's election.

Now, I'll be the first to say that I need a break from electioneering. I'm pooped, really. And cold, but that's another trip to the Eddie Bauer. But I did say in September that the Louisiana governor would have been the better choice for John McCain's running mate, and I got accused of hatching a conspiracy against Sarah Palin as a result. Now the rumor is that Jindal was offered the slot but said no, though Jindal steadfastly says that he was just interested in governing and never said if he was even extended the invitation. And it's probably all for the best: There's no telling what kind of damage to Jindal's young political career could have been wrought on McCain's coattails.

Jindal's just 37 right now, yet has enough credentials (in the following order) to make an early-thirtysomething like me feel like a complete slacker:

  • Rhodes scholar and Oxford grad
  • Advised Fortune 500 companies
  • Director of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals (and took the Medicaid from deficit to surplus)
  • President of the University of Louisiana system
  • Assistant secretary of Health and Human Services for Planning and Evaluation under Bush
  • Congressman (two-term; re-elected with 80 percent of the vote), served on House Committee on Homeland Security
  • First Louisiana governor of color since Reconstruction, as well as America's first Indian governor
He's also found the time to marry and have three kids. His life makes one tired just thinking about it. He also seamlessly guided Louisiana through Hurricane Gustav after the state's disastrous Katrina experience.

I think the past two days of GOP reflection and musings have led to one unmistakable fact: The GOP needs to rebuild. And that means, in four years, a very clean slate. My recommendation as of this point? A ticket of Bobby Jindal and Eric Cantor. All another Palin run would do is bring Tina Fey out of SNL retirement. The GOP needs to move forward, unless it craves another trouncing.

You can all get back to Post-Election Detox now.




Add to Technorati Favorites

November 6, 2008 9:17 AM

It may be a Democratic mandate, but is it a liberal one?

gaymarriage.jpgBarack Obama, on the campaign trail, lured in voters with a moderated, populist persona, banking off not only dissatisfaction with eight years of Bush in the White House but emotional appeals about hope and change and breaking racial barriers. He easily ascended to the Oval Office on Tuesday.

But a funny thing happened on Election Day. While National Journal's most liberal senator of 2007 handily beat McCain, and Democrats gained solid ground in the House and Senate, Colorado voters rejected Bill Ritter's amendment to punish Big Oil. They shot down new taxes, no matter how worthy the cause. They kept TABOR intact, and the amendment to ban affirmative action was defeated by only the narrowest of margins. And in another surprise, they voted in favor of restrictions on campaign contributions even as the president-elect busted fundraising records.

Yet let's look beyond Colorado for a moment: Gay marriage was overturned by voters in California, and even 23.5 percent of voters (55,133) in San Francisco County voted in favor of the ban. Los Angeles County, which gave 69.4 percent of the presidential vote to Obama, voted in favor of banning gay marriage. Exit polling showed that 70 percent of African-American voters statewide backed the ban, and a majority of Latinos voted in favor of Prop. 8 as well. Arizona, which two years ago rejected a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, blocked the unions this time around, as did Florida.

It wasn't a one-issue day, though. California voters also resoundingly shot down alternative-energy mandates and easier punishments for drug offenders. Arkansas voters banned unmarried couples from being adoptive or foster parents. Missouri made English the official language at government proceedings (and approved alternative energy mandates). Other victories went to the left, such as assisted suicide in Washington and the rejection of bilingual education limits in Oregon.

So now comes the proverbial "wait and see." If Obama and/or Congress go too far to the left, will the voters who got them there balk? Or will he try to govern with the more moderate tone he struck on the campaign trail?




Add to Technorati Favorites

November 5, 2008 8:36 AM

Who says the media ignored third-party candidates?

Check out this handy post-election graphic from Al-Jazeera:

aljazelex.jpgI guess being pegged an "other" is better than the U.S. media "nothing," eh?

November 4, 2008 5:04 PM

Election night liveblogging!

obamamac2.jpeg
After tonight, one of these two men won't be able to press as much flesh or kiss nearly as many babies anymore. Or if he tries, he might get arrested.

The polls are starting to close and results are gradually trickling in. Or, at least those devious devils known as exit polls are starting to roll in.

  • Kentucky to Mac (8 electoral votes and a horse) and Vermont to Obama (3 electoral votes and a buttload of maple syrup). Check out the Rocky's electoral map, which is scores cooler than the other one, as ours shows which way the state is leaning or if it's currently too close to call.
  • I wanted to take a moment for a shout out to my mom. She was going to cover her ears and have my dad break the news to her gently at the end of the night, but she gamely agreed to read this liveblog instead.
  • Maine is currently reporting a whopping two votes for Obama and one for McCain. That's either a mandate, or a sign that voters would rather be out catching lobster.
  • Poll watching entertainment: Remember the South Park "Vote or Die" rap?
  • A reminder from K-Lo: Don't call Florida yet... because people are, like, STILL VOTING.
  • Liddy Dole got slammed in North Carolina Senate race. Sununu lost New Hampshire. Yikes!
  • A source in California just e-mails me and says a robo-call from the Obama camp is going around: "The call opens up with the voice stating that the call is 'breaking news' and that Obama has run away with the battleground states." For the record, California polls don't close until 8 p.m. Pacific time. Trying to dissuade people from the polls is low.
  • Real Clear Politics is showing McCain edging Obama out on the popular vote. That won't last, but it's an interesting scenario to look at for a little while.
  • We're coming up to the next round of poll closings, looking at not only a grip of electoral votes but Al Franken's Senate race.
  • Colorado polls have just closed. The Rocky home page is keeping tabs on key races and amendments.
  • So far, Dems have gained three and the GOP have lost three in the Senate, and Dems have gained four and the GOP have lost four in the House. If there's any emotion I'll come away with tonight, it will be mourning the loss of checks and balances in D.C. Depending on the presidential outcome, I'll start mourning the loss of originalist justices to "creative" justices.
  • We're now calling Mark Udall as Colorado Senate winner. I'm just glad that nasty race is over.
  • Amendment 47 is losing early on. Come on, people, firefighters will be able to fight fires even if people aren't forced to join unions. Which one of these is not like the other??
  • From my grandmother: Imagine if they took all the money that had been spent on these presidential campaigns and put it toward paying down the national debt. Go Grandma.
  • Ohio has been called for Obama. Ed Stein is a happy guy. On the positive side, Amendments 58 and 59 are failing.
  • Vodkapundit reveals his libertarian loyalties: "I'll remind you of something I wrote on VodkaPundit earlier this week: That I would vote my conscience and drink heavily. Bob Barr, this one's for you!" On that note, I think I'll have a shot for Ralph Nader, not because I agree with his politics but because he has the chutzpah to always hang in there in a climate that values third parties about as much as Obama likes guns and religion.
  • Only about 235 precincts out of 3,215 in Colorado are reporting. This is due to the state's sophisticated voting system, whereby paper ballots are secured first and then brought by burro to processing stations.
  • The popular vote between McCain and Obama is razor-thin, but this is without California polls having closed yet. I know the Dems have gotten screwed on popular vote vs. electoral college before, but if this holds it will be far from a mandate, just as eked-out-two-wins Bush didn't have one.
  • Joe Biden won a seventh term to his Senate seat. Meanwhile, Joseph Biden is going to be vice president. Busy guy. I bet that lousy neighborhood he always waxed about on the campaign trail is proud.
  • Amendment 51 is failing. That saddens me, because the legislature here has been unresponsive to the needs of the developmentally disabled and The Arc was driven to this statute as a last resort. It would have done such good for the most vulnerable of Colorado's citizens. It's not too surprising, though, that the thought of any tax increase in tough economic times would make voters recoil and start spitting up pea soup.
  • Fox News is pegging Udall-Schaffer as too close to call, even though we called it a while ago.
  • Gamblers (and community colleges) rejoice: Amendment 50 passes.
  • Someone on our YouTube site just left a comment on Amendment 55, even though it was tossed a long time ago (we left the videos up because they're still interesting): "This amendment would force the companies to give you a better reason to fire than they just don't like you or you don't belong to a click." Can they fire you for bad spelling?
  • Cali is going to put Obama over the top for the electoral votes he needs. It's over.
  • BUT it's still too close to call on Amendments 46 and 54, and the gaps are closing on 58 and 59. Unfortunately, Jon Caldara's sock puppets didn't push Amendment 49 to victory. How can you win, though, when the union Godzilla has mailers like this stomping all over you?
  • Republicans have lost nine in the House and five in the Senate. This is part because the party has lost the meaning of "Big Tent."
  • Al Franken and Norm Coleman are locked in a dead heat. This is DISASTEROUS.
  • Karl Rove just was explaining the Franken race. Seems that a third-party candidate is sucking away GOP votes.
  • Square State reported this afternoon, "We are hearing reports that Sheriff's vehicles and uniformed officers are being placed close to the entryways of voting locations in heavily Democratic precincts of Weld County. Weld County Democrats are registering their concern that this might have a chilling effect on voters approaching the polls." I'm not buying it. Who's afraid to walk past cops unless they've done something wrong? Really!
  • Mount Virtus said a mouthful: "It's hard to live up to the promise of live-blogging when there isn't much good news to report."
  • Jeralyn at TalkLeft lists these as the reasons McCain-Palin tanked: "1) President Bush (the McCain=Bush III argument) 2) The Economy 3) Sarah Palin 4) McCain's bad judgment in picking Palin 5) McCain's age, lack of leadership qualities, and temperment problems.6) No one bought his change or maverick arguments and everyone hated his negative attack ads." ... Let's be serious, Obama didn't exactly run a clean campaign!! But I have to agree with Nos. 3 and 4. And if GOPs start blaming this loss on Kathleen Parker and Peggy Noonan, I'm gonna scream.
  • From The People's Cube: "Glorious news from Colorado, polls show 52% of our comrades voted early and often! They say Co is a purple state right now, it will be purple once the nightsticks are properly applied! Our time is at hand comrades, I must go sharpen my shovel." But did anyone see the dead voting?
  • Greg Gutfeld reasons that "of the two candidates, Obama is more likely to bomb the hell out of something." A treatise well worth reading.
  • Coleman has slightly pulled ahead of Franken. Please, please...
  • Let me pause to explain why I'm glad 58 and 59 tanked. On the severance tax, you don't penalize a major state industry, oil and gas, and encourage it to go elsewhere in a time of economic need, when industry folks need their jobs. Plus, Ritter's random scholarship plan was just cockamamie. On 59, I just thought the campaign was so disingenuous. I mean, look at our own pro-59 video. The teacher just presented it -- as the scripted campaign did -- as a savings account for education, something needed for the kids. In reality, it was TABOR deconstruction. Smoke screens suck, and sometimes the voters thankfully see through them.
  • Dirty Harry offers a little prayer: "Lord, we've taken our beating. We're listening. We'll be better. So if you could see your way clear to not make Al Franken a Senator, that would be great."
  • Speaking of that beating, GOP has lost 13 House seats and 5 Senate seats.
  • And these horn-honkers on Colfax are driving me crazy.
  • Was just getting beaten up on via Facebook by an old colleague saying "you guys" (GOP) when I had to remind him I'm an independent.
So the night is over, a storm's blowing in, and I'm finally back with my chinchilla, where I liveblogged all those everlasting debates. Leaving the Rocky, there was a mess of police cars over on 15th, a homeless guy wildly playing bucket-drums out of his shopping cart on Cleveland, and two Obama supporters near the park trying to get passing cars to honk. Even now, checking at home, the Colorado Civil Rights Initiative is too close to call. Tom Lucero and the clean government folks eked out a surprise win on Amendment 54, which will likely get targeted by the big union machine in court. I passed a bunch of "Yes on 59" signs on the way home and nearly stopped to take a smart-alec R.I.P. photo.

And Al Franken? Trailing by only about 11,000 votes with 20 counties still to be counted in Minnesota. But I'm happy to see that, in California, farm animals will get more room in a win by about 62 percent. And now, it's time for bed. Finally.

November 4, 2008 3:41 PM

Heads and tales: Colorado bloggers blog with bated breath, more

SEEN ON THE WAY TO WORK: A city worker plucking tons of yard signs from the corner of Speer and Lincoln, then unceremoniously tossing them into his pickup.

VOTE FOR EL PRESIDENTE: Slapstick Politics will be joining CBS-4 blogging of election coverage. Why, you can also catch live blogging here at the Rocky, here at this blog, as those squirrelly little returns start to trickle in!

WAITING ON TONIGHT, COLORADO STYLE:
Best Destiny hopes that McCain will challenge voting irregularities before conceding. ColoradoPols is one big swath of open threads. Mile High Delphi predicts Obama, Udall, and depressingly large Dem pickups in the House and Senate (hey, I like balance, OK?). Mount Virtus is literally praying. TalkLeft (hearts) the first exit polls. And I'm still waiting for Square State to come up with an election-night drinking game. Vodkapundit, on the other hand, isn't waiting for imbibing guidance, and opines that Obama has run the dirtiest campaign since Nixon '72.

A LONG DAY, INDEED: The counter help at Duane Reade try to get Greg Gutfeld to vote for Obama, calling McCain a "f*#@ing lizard." What happened to the days where you could just go in and buy Advil and chewing gum? (The Daily Gut)

SOMEONE HAS TO WATCH 'EM: Dirty Harry is on a live feed of exit poll watching. Didn't know he was that much of a glutton for punishment.

HE SHOULD HAVE BROUGHT THE BLACK PANTHERS: Tim Robbins is turned away from polling place, refuses to fill out provisional place, wails about voter intimidation, etc. Didn't we need a spark of humor today? (TMZ)

By the way, here's the raw footage of the Philadelphia voting security:





Add to Technorati Favorites

(Got a super-hot blog post or other Web news? Tip off Bridget at johnsonbr@rockymountainnews.com, include the URL, and she'll give you a hat tip back if she uses it.)

November 4, 2008 2:03 PM

Funniest election feed... but is it entirely satirical?

Worker_capitalist.gifI've often linked to material from The People's Cube, what I find to be one of the cleverest news satire sites around (I mean, can you not love the guys who invented Che-Mart?). The brains behind the site is Oleg Atbashian, a Ukrainian who created agitprop during the time of the Soviet Union. After moving to the United States in 1994, Oleg found the fondness for all things far-left -- from those who had never lived under the "progressive" Soviet system -- to be amusing, and the rest is history. The site's election thread today, "The Great Patriotic Change '08," had me laughing out loud from the intro:

"Comrades from all over the world are converging. Young, old, dead, plant, pets, oatmeal and just everyone and everything in between is ready, willing and now registered to hand Senator Obama -- OUR SAVIOR -- a solid and decisive VICTORY! ... We are surging into Socialism and won't stop till every dead voter is counted -THRICE!"

The site's commenters are being asked to report on the vote from their local collectives. More gems:


"Reporting in from Small Town, NC.  Chairman M. S. Punchenko

Just returned from Dr's office.  Raining but peoples lining up at polls.  Is good.  Washes dirt from any necro-voters and cleaned my shovel.

After 'New Dawn' tommorow won't have to pay said Dr bill.  Or for gas in my car or make mortgage payment.  Life in Omerica will be good."

Or this one:

"Comrades!

Glorious strides are being made here in Pennsylvania!

Our listening post in Pittsburgh intercepted an enemy transmission coming from a Bitter Clinger known as Jim Quinn that another Bitter Clinger overheard a Party Commissar giving voting instructions to a Young Pioneer:

'Vote very slowly. See all those people standing behind you, they're Republicans, and they have to go to work.'"

And this one:

"Comrades I report to you today for the Peoples Collective of Suwanee located in the Peoples Republik of Goergia. Glorious news. The district Commissars are passing out pre filled out ballots. All one need do is to make his mark on it and drop it in the ballot box."

And yet another commentary:

"Comrades, reporting in, I voted 122 times today, thank you ACORN! "

November 4, 2008 1:06 PM

How to get people to vote? Bribe them!

thanksforvoting_373.jpgExcuse me for asking, but is this how democracy is supposed to work? In Iraq, when citizens finally got to go to the polls in 2005, they walked for miles to get to polling stations and stood in lines hundreds deep just to make their mark and get that purple finger. In America, just to get people to vote, Starbucks offers free java, Krispy Kreme is handing out free donuts, and Ben & Jerry's just wants to "celebrate democracy" with its free scoops.

But, oh no, it doesn't stop there: Sex-toy chain Babeland is offering free vibrators and similar goodies to voters. I'm practically sitting on hands to keep from typing the jokes that you can make off of that one...

Let's be serious: The incentive programs are SAD. Just sad.

  Add to Technorati Favorites

November 4, 2008 12:33 PM

'Vote or die' takes on new meaning, Diddy!

diddy.jpg
Did you vote yet today? Did a friendly neighborhood Black Panther help you make your decision? I'm here at the Rocky with jumbo Diet Coke, enough caffeine to at least make it through the first jacked-up round of exit polls! Stay tuned all night as I blog, blog, blog the evening's events!

Now, about that "vote or die" taking on new meaning: Thanks to the U.S. district court, you can actually do both! No more having to choose between voting or dying!! Voters around the country may be waiting for history to be made, but here in Colorado we're waiting for no less than a miracle. Yes, sometime before the polls close, a dozen dead, disenfranchised voters -- who were nearly purged from the rolls by a secretary of state insensitive to the plight of the decomposing -- will rise from their graves and proceed to their appropriate polling place to cast their votes (perhaps exactly the way Mr. Latest Activist Judge would prefer they vote, eh?). So keep an eye out for these politically active zombies -- and read Vincent Carroll's column on the mess, too.

Add to Technorati Favorites

November 3, 2008 2:03 PM

By straying from the middle, McCain may likely miss the mark

mccain.jpgBefore Super Tuesday -- and California's primary having been moved from June to that February date -- we opinion writers at the L.A. Daily News sat around and took sides. Watching the GOP primary race hadn't been too inspiring for me, and I had begun to rethink why I'd discounted John McCain early in the game, like many others had. I came back with one answer -- age -- as I'd been convinced that 2000 was McCain's heyday. So as other writers picked Rudy, Mitt, Huckabee, Obama, Clinton and Edwards, I wrote the pre-primary endorsement of McCain for the Daily News.

I highlighted some of the themes he's used since in his campaign: his military service, his calls to return to fiscal conservatism, his experience. While Romney was beating the "Washington insider" label to death, I argued that someone who's been on the inside wasn't a bad thing in this crucial time of transition. But above all, I highlighted McCain's bipartisan record and appeal to the growing bloc of moderates, noting the conservative bullying against his nomination that was overwhelming the GOP at the time:

"...Conservative pundits have somehow been less comfortable with the knowns about McCain than the vast, often unsettling unknowns about his challengers. But even though he has a lifetime rating of 82 percent from the American Conservative Union, there is nothing McCain will be able to do to fend off the attacks from within his own party.

And why should he even try? McCain has felt the brunt of gutter politics before, in his 2000 bid for the nomination when the Bush campaign unleashed nasty rumors to crush the senator in South Carolina. But his win there eight years later is a testament to McCain's character: A true leader has persistence to make the wrongs right. This is a valuable quality sorely needed in our next president."


Well, it turns out there was something McCain could do to fend off attacks from his own party (for the most part), and that was nominated Sarah Palin. But in the process of his campaign McCain has lost so much of that 2000 appeal, that genuine maverick that's now the brunt of SNL jokes. And this was happening before he even picked Palin, as was highlighted in my March 10 column on "How John McCain can win the White House."

"McCain, don't worry about exciting the Christian Right. They'll be 'on your team' at a place called the ballot box when they're wretching at the thought of a Democrat-controlled White House. Yeah, even as they run to the next secret-handshake CNP meeting to gloat about their alleged 'protest vote.'

...Let them rant. Let them complain. Keep shaking off anti-Catholic televangelist John Hagee. You've got work to do. It's called 'being yourself.'

Because that, my friend, is the only way you'll win the election come November.

You are one of the few Republicans, in this day and age and after eight years of Bush's divisive presidency, who has the ability to handily lay claim to the middle. You need the ever-growing middle, moderate sea of voters to win the White House. You don't need to do anything that will get you painted as a panderer to the far right. The middle's reaction to that would be a sort of synchronized electoral 'ick.'"


Nowadays, this moderate-libertarian-semi-conservative right-leaning independent (that's right -- not all journalists are liberal) can barely recognize the Mac who impressively came back on the attack in January. The debates with Obama were a series of missed opportunities, the opportunity to bring Latino voters back to the GOP was missed by just disregarding their community issues (and not seizing upon their lukewarm regard for Obama), the campaign now seems like an at-odds tug-of-war not between Dem and GOP but with Palin setting herself up with social conservatives for a 2012 run, and a vast spectrum of independents that could have been ripe for the picking have essentially been sent packing. To see Mac's momentum peter out at this stage in the game is truly disheartening. The thought of Obama backed up by a solidly Democratic House and Senate is even more depressing for those of us who like checks and balances.

I think it's summed up nicely by American University presidential historian Allan Lichtman: "My advice to Senator McCain is fire the consultants, fire the handlers, fire the speechwriters. Get rid of them all and spend the rest of the campaign being the McCain you were in 2000." Unfortunately, it may be too late.


Add to Technorati Favorites

November 3, 2008 1:23 PM

Gun-wielding Obama fan shuts Southern California freeway

Oh, the insanity continues! I was tipped off to this by a former colleague who got stuck in the ensuing traffic snarl. Here's what Channel 6 News in Santa Maria, Calif., reports on the standoff:

"Highway 101 is back open after being closed all morning due to a standoff on a overpass, according to Caltrans.

According to our Action News crew on scene, the standoff with a 28-year-old gunman on a Highway 101 overpass in Santa Barbara has ended with the suspect taken into custody, no shots were fired.

...According to our Action News crew, before the 28-year-old man was taken into custody the bomb squad robot was sent out to the man with an Obama-Biden sign. The man was allowed to hang his American flag on the La Cumbre overpass with the Obama-Biden sign."


The L.A. Times also penned their own story:

"A masked gunman who was waving an American flag on a freeway overpass in Santa Barbara was in police custody after an hours-long standoff that shut down the freeway in both directions and caused a rush-hour traffic snarl, officials said.

The man, 28-year-old Edward Van Tassel, first handed over his handgun to authorities and asked for a Barack Obama sign, which he posted on a chain-link fence on the overpass along with the flag he was holding, said Sgt. Lorenzo Duarte of the Santa Barbara Police Department.

The freeway was reopened shortly after the incident was resolved."

What would you like, ask the police negotiators? An escape vehicle? Nah. A one-way ticket out of the country? Nah. An Uzi? Nope. A Barack Obama yard sign? YEAH!!

UPDATE: The Associated Press makes no mention of the Obama sign, just the American flag in the hands of the crazed gunman. Go figure.

UPDATE NUMERO DOS: That AP story has been updated to add "The man agreed to give up after he was allowed to attach a Barack Obama campaign sign and the flag to the overpass railing, said police Sgt. Jim Pfleging." Leaving out that the guy demanded the sign and was handed the sign by a bomb robot.

Add to Technorati Favorites

November 3, 2008 12:05 PM

Does anyone really want the endorsement of Sun Myung Moon?

moon.jpg
Curiously, Sun Myung Moon has been rather AWOL this election season (except for the Obama-Muslim story in Insight, of course). Mitt Romney at one point had a Moon operative on his Faith and Values Steering Committee. Charlie Black, senior adviser to John McCain, was one of the organizers of Moon's crowning as king of the America on Capitol Hill in 2004, telling journalist John Gorenfeld "I lent my name and sent invitations to a few friends." But other than that, the politically fond Moon hasn't made any hellraising statements for either candidate, surely to their great relief. In the 11th hour, though, the organization of the guy who said he'd "conquer and subjugate the world" and was "in our battle against the whole nation of the U.S." has jumped in the ring supporting California's Proposition 8, the ban on gay marriage, perhaps to the consternation of some 8 backers.

No surprise, considering Moon has called gays "dung-eating dogs" and has said that "gays will be eliminated," the head of Moon's U.S. organization, Michael Jenkins, released a statement on the PR Newswire today urging a yes vote on Prop. 8.

I guess this means gay mass weddings to total strangers will be out of the question? Nah, I think most gays would have too much sense for that, anyway.

Add to Technorati Favorites

November 3, 2008 9:24 AM

Today's 11th hour video: Obama on bankrupting the coal industry

October 30, 2008 5:45 PM

Liveblogging the Schaffer-Udall debate!

DM0724 SCHAFFER_UDALL_DEBATE 5.JPG
I'm at CBS-4, ready for the start of the Bob Schaffer and Mark Udall debate.

5:45: They're trying to find Udall for the coin toss. Meanwhile, everyone is running the gantlet trying to get in the building -- there are Schaffer and Udall supporters facing off on all four corners of Lincoln and 10th, and I saw at least one car accident narrowly averted because someone was honking and waving at their favorite peeps. But which side, we don't know, because the different camps were mixed in, doing their best to agitate each other. Meanwhile, Channel 4 had one space left for the Bridgetblogmobile. Score!!

5:54: We're close to the start of the debate. I'm sitting in the press room, enclosed in glass with fellow members of my species, kept away from the decent people but available for remote scientific study.

6:00 p.m. Here we go!

  • First question: We're all hardened and cynical about politics! Tell us about a promise that you made that you might not keep... huh? Udall starts waxing about the economy. Is this answering the question? I thought he's supposed to talk about how he might jack up. Oh, it's a promise he'll keep. Schaffer is committed to lower tax rates and stronger economic growth. He's looking unusually friendly tonight."
  • Here goes our own Lynn Bartels asking about one word to explain debate Schaffer says "explaining" and repeats the word Boulder many times in his answer. Udall says "rude" -- LOL!! The closed captioning on TV says that Udall just said "filly blusstering," Schaffer fires back -- still with that forced smile -- about how he would represent values in U.S. Senate.
  • The question is bipartisanship, something you'd regret on the campaign trail, etc. Udall starts talking about veterans, health care, wildlife, fuzzy puppies who wag their tails every time they see him... OK, almost that. Schaffer is smiling broadly while talking about how vicious Udall's campaign has been. I'm waiting for the word "Boulder," or the word "liberal," or hopefully some combination thereof. Bob reminds us of Congress' 9 percent approval rating (good call) and how you gotta replace the folks there.
  • Udall rebuts by saying his feelings haven't been hurt by the campaign. Kumbaya.
  • Raj is up with the negative ad watch -- woohoo! First up is shadowy evil looking oilman Bob Schaffer. Next up is Boulder Liberal Mark Udall. Now is veterans wanting to shoot down Schaffer. Next up is shadowy evil looking Mark Udall.
  • Schaffer is asked about Udall voting against body armor and troop funding. Schaffer says it's cuz he voted against defensive bills that included such items. Fair enough. Udall says he served on armed services committee, so take that! Udall is now asked about the Schaffer Big Oil claims when Schaffer did vote for renewable energy. Udall ducks the question about why he won't give Bob credit, and waxes about wonderful renewable energy.
  • Schaffer points out the obvious -- Marky Mark didn't answer the question. He's still forcing the smile, but his hands are starting to flail. This is Schaffer more in his element. Going for the jugular. You'd think he would have arrived at this point as soon as Udall called him rude earlier.
  • Udall responds to veterans funding ads. Schaffer says it's "baloney," that he has a super-pro-veterans record. Raj did a good job of bringing these two gents out of their shells.
  • Schaffer poses question to Udall about not caring about kids with disabilities, why he would direct the dough to education research. Doesn't want to "rob Peter to pay Paul." But what about little crippled Peter??
  • Udall asks what Schaffer even did in Congress. Bob is on a tear, rattling off stuff from the CDC to ranchland to missile defense.
  • Schaffer asks Udall why the National Endowment for Humanities was more important then clean coal technology. This is an awesome debate -- which is more important to you, humanity or coal?? Udall calls them gotcha votes.
  • Udall needles him on going to Kurdistan for oil stuff, a question that we asked Bob about when he came to our edit board. We have his answer in our video player. But he stresses to Udall that China will take over Kurdistan if we don't jump into the economic opportunities.
  • Greg from Arvada asks about S&L regulation. Schaffer says regulation wouldn't necessarily save the day and Congress should learn its lesson. Udall said he's the only one who stood up to Fannie and Freddie. It's like "Meet the Press" revisited.
  • Kathy in Aurora asks about securing the border. And she's right -- nobody's talking about immigration. Udall says physical borders "where they make sense," more Border Patrol, bringing "undocumented workers out of the shadows." Schaffer should be in his element. Brings up Udall's votes on tuition subsidies for illegal immigrants, etc. He looked really happy at that question.
  • Marilyn in Straburg wants to know why we should give $$ to other countries when there are poor people here. (Um, because we care about other people who are worse off than we are??) Udall talks about funding community health care, but didn't really answer the question. Schaffer thinks the question was cool. He's not going to be joining in on the next "We Are the World' anytime soon, and nitpicks on funding to Africa.
  • Glenda of Denver asks about gay marriage. Schaffer says it's too much to expect the state to sanction it. Udall takes the safe road with civil unions and domestic partnerships.
  • Back to the panel and question about success in Iraq. Schaffer sums it up nicely if wordily by saying it's about Iraq maintaining its territorial integrity. Why doesn't he see when he's on to a good point and wrap it up in a nice little soundbite package? Udall calls Iraq a "misadventure" twice and then declares that we have won the war and it's time to get out and hand it back to Iraqis. (Um, we already handed it over. That's when it went from the coalitional authority to the Iraqi government.)
  • Lynn asks about Department of Peace moonbattery proposal. Udall said it was "duplicative" and "made some sense at the time." He said he made his point and then it was time to move on. Is Congress just for grandstanding, then? No wonder nothing gets done.
  • Lynn asks Bob about school choice being No. 1 issue for GOP. Schaffer says he can't speak on behalf of all Republicans but feels for poor kids who can't go to a better school. He just doesn't feel for poor African kids. :(
  • Both are asked about political ideological independence. Schaffer is asked about the Dream Act, college for kids of illegal immigrants. Schaffer open to foreign students,but not tax dollars subsidizing kids of illegals. Udall looks like he's now in his element, and says you can't punish kids for their parents' illicit border crossing.
  • Udall is asked on card check, without the panel describing that it's a labor bill for the folks at home. Schaffer happily provides the explanation and goes after Udall's jugular on it. The closed captioning called it "car check." This debate is so unfair to the deaf.
  • Lightning round! Zapp! Schaffer advocates "belt-tightening" in Congress and Udall says Congress should be sure that "liquidity is injected into banks." He counters how Schaffer dissed Congress for taking vacation. We're all campaigning, counters Udall. Fair enough, but they were voted into office to get things done, not hit the trail again.
  • Schaffer is on a cool tear against socialism. No redistributing of wealth and take from those of ability to give to those in need, he says.
  • Schaffer reminds us that he's unemployed and had to buy his own health insurance. Another reporter grumbles about Bob's $200K severance check. I suggest that maybe he donated it to African children, and that's why he's in financial straits. Udall says we all can't eat out that much. The closed captioning is talking about "welsh spending." That's right. Our economy depends on how much the Welsh sink into the U.S.
  • What do they drive? Bob drives a Ford-whatever. He doesn't know the model. Oy. Udall, of course, is driving the powdery blue Prius I saw parked in the lot. Remember the "South Park" episode where they called it the Pious? I'm thinking of that know.
  • Closing statements. Udall tries to paint himself as super-independent. Schaffer barks that Udall drives a "bus... big luxury motor home." Udall just looks down at his podium. He's entitled to say, "Yeah... you don't even know what you drive!!" Schaffer makes the case that he's new blood and that the current Congress stinks.
After the debate I went into the studio to talk to each of the candidates, but turns out that they'd been quickly scuttled to other areas. I asked Udall about the fact that he says his feelings weren't hurt by negative campaign advertising, but then when asked to assign one word to the debates he said rude... how frustrated are you feeling with the tenor of the campaign by this point, I asked? Udall responded that it's been "fierce" and "combative," and said he "wants civil discourse" but thought that Schaffer was rude and interrupted him in early debates, on "Meet the Press," etc. "People want the approach I bring," Udall said. I then asked Udall if he thought Schaffer was "rude" tonight. Udall smiled. "Congressman Schaffer was polite tonight, relatively speaking," he responded.

I left the studio to find Schaffer disappearing down a stairwell and Dick Wadhams talking to our own Ed Sealover in the hall, yet some apparent Udall staffer were needling Wadhams -- they began snapping at each other about Web sites being illegal. Wadhams said he'd continue talking with Ed only away from the Udall folks, and as he disappeared down the stairs the Udall guy snapped, "Watch out for those DUIs, buddy!" Ed quickly asked what he meant, but the Udall folks walked off.

I think East and West Coast rappers are more civil with each other.


October 30, 2008 2:08 PM

Counting down to the Schaffer-Udall showdown

DM0483 SCHAFFER_UDALL_DEBATE 5.JPG
Be sure to tune in to CBS-4 at 6 p.m. tonight to catch the Rocky-CBS debate between knock-down dragsters Bob Schaffer and Mark Udall, who, if you haven't noticed by now, both want to be Colorado's next senator. (The Wadhams Posse will begin rallying outside the studio at 4:30 p.m.) I'll be live blogging on scene at the start of the debate. And since this is our baby, too, I've seen the reader questions for the dynamic duo. It should get interesting, so stay tuned!

(And if either of them mention Joe the Plumber, I'm going to beat my head against my laptop...)

Add to Technorati Favorites

October 30, 2008 12:13 PM

Just when you thought there were no more plays on Obama's name

Modern Conservative has compiled its (un)Official Barack Obama Glossary.

Add to Technorati Favorites

October 29, 2008 9:13 PM

Georgia Goes to John McCain

No, I mean the other Georgia... the one that Russia wants to own, not the mint julep one. Al-Jazeera went there to investigate the Mac Pack.

bushstreet.jpg

October 27, 2008 2:13 PM

What the candidates aren't talking about: Immigration

borderfence.jpgToday I touch on one of the things we aren't hearing from the campaign trail. Remember when immigration was such a make-or-break issue that John McCain was persona non grata in the primaries for having backed comprehensive immigration reform? Yep, that was just this year, but since the field was narrowed to McCain and Barack Obama we've heard nary a peep from the pair, not even grandstanding photos in blue jeans standing a foot away from a ramshackle border fence. (I took that photo in 2006, in southeastern California; the "fence" is about 18 inches inside the United States, and on the other side is Mexico.)

And yet, there are still an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the U.S., and now a troubled economy to boot. Spain is currently having issues with record unemployment, and has offered immigrants a buyout if they return home. At the same time they've built barriers to keep out illegal North African immigrants, Spain needs more highly skilled immigrants in technical and health fields to keep the country's economy moving. Everybody's got their own issues with immigration, highlighted by financial crisis, and yet any solution to America's need for immigration reform has been swept under the rug this campaign season. Not even a question about the issue in the televised debates.

So where do the candidates stand on immigration? Their officially stated platforms are rather similar: secure the borders, have a guest-worker program, keep families together, crack down on employers who hire illegal workers, and put crime-free illegal immigrants on a path to citizenship:

  • Obama's platform: "Obama and Biden support a system that allows undocumented immigrants who are in good standing to pay a fine, learn English, and go to the back of the line for the opportunity to become citizens."
  • McCain's platform: "Assure that the remaining undocumented immigrants learn English, pay back taxes and fines, and pass a citizenship course as part of a path to legal status. Guarantee that no person here illegally receives a green card before those that have been legally waiting outside the country."

The campaign platforms are a bit tempered from the candidates' histories on the issue. McCain became vilified by many conservatives for drafting a comprehensive immigration reform plan with Sen. Ted Kennedy. Obama made a speech on comprehensive reform from the Senate floor:
"...I will not support any bill that does not provide this earned path to citizenship for the undocumented population--not just for humanitarian reasons; not just because these people, having broken the law, did so for the best of motives, to try and provide a better life for their children and their grandchildren; but also because this is the only practical way we can get a handle on the population that is within our borders right now."

More recently, Obama's campaign called roundups of illegal immigrants "divisive" and said local immigration enforcement "can lead to unintentional discrimination against Latinos." On the other side, McCain has stayed out of Sheriff's Joe Arpaio's re-election bid because of famous feuding between the two. But what it all boils down to is this: McCain doesn't want to lose conservatives by going too far left; Obama doesn't want to lose independents by going too far left. So they're both doing a very soft-language dance, if they even talk about the issue at all. And they end up looking eerily similar.


Add to Technorati Favorites

October 24, 2008 10:18 AM

We are all burly, bald Ohio plumbers!

iamjoe.jpg
So goes the new McCain campaign strategy, complete with solemn inspirational soundtrack, working off the copious mentions of Joe the Plumber at the last debate. People were invited to submit videos on why they are Joe the Plumber... or why they are just generally scared of Obama making off with their hard-earned cash.

Add to Technorati Favorites

October 17, 2008 3:06 PM

Watch Schaffer and Udall on Rocky Opinion on YouTube!

Almost all of the clips from our recent editorial board meetings with the two Senate candidates -- save for Bob Schaffer's long, rejected-by-YouTube answer on the bailout -- are not only available here at the Rocky site, but on our Rocky Opinion on YouTube site, where you can also comment and issues ratings as well as embed the clips on your blog or Web site.

Here's my fave, ready to go viral -- Schaffer reacts to John McCain's uber-pricey mortgage bailout proposal:


October 17, 2008 1:18 PM

McCain shouldn't laugh during Obama's confession

mccaineganobama.jpg

October 15, 2008 9:07 PM

Joe the Plumber scorecard

MCCAIN: 15 name drops

OBAMA: 5 name drops

(Tally kept by Fox News)

Here's video of Joe's original exchange with Obama:


October 15, 2008 5:29 PM

Liveblogging the final presidential debate!

mccainobamahug.jpg
Stay tuned for the liveblogging of the final presidential snoozer debate here beginning at 7 p.m. Mountain time!

Here we go: I'm drinking an icy Jarritos Pina, the best Mexican soda ever, in recognition of the fact that they probably won't debate immigration... again.

  • Stand up, sit down, fight fight fight -- the position of the candidates changes every time (sitting tonight), and lo and behold their positions also change with the polls! :) Drum roll, por favor!
  • First question is on Wall Street. McCain says Americans are angry. He must have had access to our letters to the editor queue. Mac wants to take $300B of the $750B allocated for financial bailout for his cockamamie mortgage bailout. I didn't know the cash was for divvying up. Won't AIG wail?
  • Obama on Wall Street. He's concerned about fat cats getting fatter. Redistribute that wealth, baby! He's outlining his economic plan of jobs, middle class tax cut, is concerned that banks could profit from McCain's home bailout. Rattling on about energy policy, health care, etc. again -- I thought the moderator said they were going to talk about NEW policies!
  • OOOHHHH yes, Mac is hitting on the Ohio plumber!! (See my morning roundup and the WealthSpread.) Now Mac is talking directly to Joe the Plumber. Tee-hee ... this debate might actually be good. Obama is grinning.
  • Obama fires back by saying Joe the Plumber listened to too many McCain ads, then Mac fires back with the WealthSpread comment of Obama's. He's off to a good start. We've head Joe the Plumber's name about 20 times by now.
  • Obama's excuse is that he just wants to help Poor Plumbers.
  • Next question is on trimming programs because, er, you can't have everything!! Obama wants to cut programs line by line. He'll probably cut a program to not gouge Small-Business Plumbers. Mac is going back to buying up mortgages. Either he can explain it better and sell people on it, or he'll just ruin all the ground he gained with Joe the Plumber.
  • OK, I'm bored. Same ol' talking points. Now on to balancing the budget. Ooh, another good zinger from McCain. "I'm not President Bush... if you wanted to run against Bush you should have run four years ago." He's kind of on his game, though lapsing back to the same talking points now and then.
  • Mac challenges Obama to talk about standing up to his party. Obama only brings up examples where he voted against some Democratic lobbyists: trial lawyers, teacher unions, etc. Obama seems to be falling into a trap a bit: "If I've mistakenly..." compared Mac ecnomic policies with Bush's... sounds like he's acknowledging some sort of confusion, which is obviously not true considering the comparison of Mac to Bush is well-calculated.
  • Schieffer rattles off how mean they've been to each other in the campaign. McCain brings up John Lewis comments about their campaign and segregation and challenges Obama to repudiate remarks. Obama basically says no one cares about hurt feelings and that voters just want them to debate on the issues, and says GOP 527s are mean. No mention of Rep. Lewis...
  • Joe the Plumber's 15 minutes of fame have stretched to 31!!
  • Now on to Lewis -- Obama justifies the comments with Palin rallies (Obama must read Paul Campos). Then he says that they put out clarification statements. Mac focuses on the good people that come to GOP rallies and says there are some things yelled -- and T-shirts worn -- at Obama rallies that are nasty.
  • Great line from Mac on Ayers: "I don't care about an old washed-up terrorist, but..." does want to know extent of Obama's relationship with him. Obama says Ayers is a professor of education in Chicago. Says Ayers committed despicable acts when he was 8 years old, but 10 years ago he served on an education board with Ayers. Made clear that Ayers won't be a cabinet member. :) Says ACORN had nothing to do with his campaign.
  • Wow -- Obama's on the defensive so far. Color me surprised. Mac brings up that Ayers said he wished he had bombed more. Will American voters see Mac as positively on the offensive or as angry guy?
  • Question is whose running mate would make a better president. Obama brings up that Biden came from hardscrabble Scranton. I'm cracking up thinking of the Biden-Palin SNL skit. Let's be serious, though... this is a much harder question for Mac to answer: McCain says she's a "freth of bresh air." Seriously.
  • Obama is stumped with many uhhs when asked by Schieffer if Palin is qualified, then he shifts to needing more spending for kids with autism. McCain is asked the same on his friend Joe the Senator (no relation to Joe the Plumber, who I'm missing right now), and says basically, yeah, but he kinda sucks on foreign policy.
  • McCain has the best exasperated quote of the campaign: "Why do we always have to spend more?" Cha-ching!
  • Question on reducing oil imports: Mac says Canuck oil is fine, Venezuela oil is icky. Yeah!! On free trade: Mac says it's a no-brainer with Colombia and maybe Obama should actually travel down there. Obama says too many labor leaders are getting assassinated.
  • I wonder if the only people still watching are Frank Luntz's poll group...
  • Now on the health care plans. Notice how Obama never mentions the bouncing baby bureaucracy National Health Insurance Exchange when explaining his plan, though he talks about establishing it on his Web site.
  • JOE THE PLUMBER FOR PRESIDENT!!!
  • Who establishes which small businesses can afford to give employees health insurance?? I smell more bureaucracy, more commissions, more panels, more... ick.
  • Mac: "Hey Joe, you're rich, congratulations." Heh. This is fun. McCain is articulating his plan better. Are we sure the townhall format was his best?
  • Prediction: Joe the Plumber, Fox News analyst
  • Judicial nods! Finally a new question. Would they nominate a Roe disagreeing justice to the Supreme Court? Mac says no litmus test; base on qualifications. Obama briefly says no litmus test, but says Roe was right and starts justifying his abortion position. Says he would have judges who have more of a sense of what "real world" folks are going through. How about a justice who studies the constitution as our most important, bedrock document and leaves the emotion out of it??
  • Smackdown -- Mac brings up Obama and the infants born alive after botched abortions. Obama just says it's not true, but claims the law would have "underminded Roe" and there was something already on the books. Steers topic toward both sides joining to help prevent unintended pregnancies. Mac digs at Obama over the health of the mother exception that Obama wants for late-term bans -- how the meaning of "health" has been stretched. He should have stayed on that point for a little longer instead of veering to his adopted daughter.
  • Education: Obama is in his talking-point comfort zone now. Early education, teacher training, affordable college, yadda.
  • Editorial comment: My diamond dove is making throw-up sounds.
  • Mac: "It's the civil rights issue of the 21st century." Take that, John Lewis! Pushes school choice and finding bad teachers a "new line of work." Love it.
  • Vouchers and eduzk lnv;kodf;jv sipvjsvsai vsdvodjs... sorry, fell asleep on the keyboard.
  • Joe the Plumber for schools superintendent!!
  • Closing statements: Do or die, gents. ACCKKKK!!! No more "my friends," Mac! He's stumbling a lot. But it's a pretty good speech. This is the time for each of their standard talking points. Obama is harping on the Bush years again. You know, both candidates are banking their closing statements on change. But they're vastly different genres of change.
You know, I'm really relieved that the debates are over, but now I want to see one more debate: with Joe the Plumber as moderator!!

joetheplumber.jpgThe pundits are now up: Juan Williams thinks Obama was not knocked off his game, Bill Kristol says McCain should have hammered points on Obama's health care and tax plans more, Nina Easton thinks Mac was just trying to paint Obama as a liberal, Fred Barnes agreed it was like a tennis match back and forth but thought Mac didn't hit hard enough. Most of Frank Luntz's poll group though Obama won the debate... one guy says, "But I'm not voting for a great debater, I'm voting for a great president." Heh. Their favorable ratings jumped when McCain said Obama should have run four years ago if he wanted to run against Bush.

Here's my take: As the ice has nearly melted in my fizzy Jarritos, I'm reminded that, once again, they never discussed immigration -- and this is the last debate. Not that that's a make-or-break issue, but that's just one topic that never got touched in a series of debates that loved the economy, taxes, health care, and Pakistan. McCain clearly came into this debate swinging, and in that regard I'd give the edge to him as he brought up some points that clearly needed to see the light of day. Obama just had to stay cool and roll with the punches, and for completing that task he'd likewise be awarded with the edge.

But these debates also highlighted missed opportunities: I would have turned to Obama after one of his most-quipped talking points and said, "You can't grow the middle class by making the rich poorer." You can't try to forcibly even out the classes. That's the hallmark of a socialist society, not America -- where, thankfully, an individual's drive and determination can shape success. Like, yes, Joe the Plumber, who explained his conversation with Obama in a recent interview:

"Initially, I started off asking him if he believed in the American Dream and he said yes, he does - and then I proceeded to ask him then why he's penalizing me for trying to fulfill it. He asked, 'what do you mean,' and I explained to him that I'm planning on purchasing this company - it's not something I'm gonna purchase outright, it's something I'm going to have to make payments on for years - but essentially I'm going to buy this company, and the profits generated by that could possibly put me in that tax bracket he's talking about and that bothers me. It's not like I would be rich; I would still just be a working plumber. I work hard for my money, and the fact that he thinks I make a little too much that he just wants to redistribute it to other people. Some of them might need it, but at the same time, it's not their discretion to do it - it's mine."

McCain is proposing big government expansion with his mortgage buyback. But Obama is proposing big government expansion in a way that runs contrary to a non-socialist system. It's your choice, my friends: Start with your vote here.
 

October 14, 2008 4:27 PM

Disenfranchised Slurpee drinkers

Driving to work today, I saw a sign outside 7-Eleven stating that customers could "vote" there. Considering that I never get up early enough to stop for a drink or munchie, I checked on the Web to see what the 7-Eleveners were up to:

711vote.jpgQuite simple, no butterfly ballot to leave people crying the aisles: Buy your coffee in a McCain or Obama cup, and the company tallies the results. As of today, Obama has 59 percent and McCain has 41 percent. Here in Colorado, it's 63 percent for Barack and  37 percent for Mac.  McCain is only winning New Hampshire, West Virginia, and North Carolina, out of the participating states.

The good news -- besides the publicity 7-Eleven gets from people like me blogging about the exercise -- is that the coffee-cup balloting has to be at least as accurate as CBS exit polling.

The bad news is how this disenfranchises those who don't drink coffee, like moi. Is 7-Eleven prepared to provide cup-a-ballots to Big Gulp and Slurpee drinkers?  What does it say for democracy when only java addicts have a voice?

And for that matter, where are the third-party cups? Is it because it would just be wrong to put decaf in a Nader cup?

Add to Technorati Favorites

October 13, 2008 12:09 PM

Obama's health care plan, in pictures

healthplans.jpg
This is an image from a report of the Tax Policy Center, which studied the dueling health plans of McCain and Obama (updated in July). You'll see that Obama's plan starts hitting taxpayers in the pocketbook in the fourth quintile -- that's a minimum of about $58,000 a year, not exactly rich folk. Comparison between the above columns just shows what each candidate believe the word "equitable" means: on one, hard work is rewarded; on another, hard work is, er, redistributed.


Add to Technorati Favorites

October 9, 2008 3:10 PM

Buck up, anarchists!

the-anarchist-cookbook.jpgThe DNC may be long over, but the party's not over! Well, at least the thirst for global domination is not over, nor is the delusion that that financial crisis will finally turn everyone against the corporate capitalist masses and into Molotov-cocktail-chucking bandanna-clad heroes of the anti-establishment. Unconventional Action (think Unconventional Denver at the time of the DNC) analyzes "Anarchist organizing in the post-Bush political situation":

"If Obama becomes president, many anarchists and other radicals predict, the euphoria on the part of liberals and progressives will quickly give way to disillusionment as the shining star of the Democrats fails to follow through on his empty promises of hope and change."

Hey, maybe they're not so loopy after all!!

"One possibility is that the vast liberal/progressive base of Obama's campaign and the new Democratic Party followers will find themselves disaffected from the two-party path and open to new, increasingly radical directions. In this case, anarchists should be ready to seize the moment with consistent, visible, exciting actions and propaganda, and provide accessible points of entry for people to become involved in anti-political organizing and direct action. On the other hand, another possibility is that large sectors of the US population will respond to the failure of the hope/change rhetoric by moving in a more overtly fascist direction (supporting heavily authoritarian leadership, accelerating imprisonment and police repression, intensified scapegoating of immigrants, etc). In this instance, a solidly functioning network of communication and action will be crucial to anarchist self-defense, to oppose right-wing reaction from the community level and promoting anti-authoritarian analyses of the situation."

Fear not, they also ponder the situation should McCain pull a Hail Mary and win:

"...Direct action will be crucially necessary to stem the tide of militarism and oppression, and the haphazard, disconnected, and sporadic undertakings of these past years won't be enough. Also, the massive grassroots swell behind Obama will find their hopes frustrated, and many will seek new political outlets for their disappointment. Anarchists demonstrating alternatives in practice to the electoral system can provide a path for this energy away from the two-party black hole and towards direct action."

In other words, latch on to the suckers!! Build the ranks!

So if you "reject all forms of hierarchy including capitalism, party communism, patriarchy, white supremacy, colonialism, and so-called representational politics" and "do not condemn any action on the grounds that it is illegal alone," you don't need a convention to conspire in town with other anarchists.

Add to Technorati Favorites

October 7, 2008 3:50 PM

Liveblogging the presidential debate, Numero Dos!

obamamac.jpg
Getting ready for tonight's live blog of the presidential town hall debate. Tune in at 7 p.m. Mountain time, when my fingers will be flying on the keyboard at an unhealthy speed!

7 minutes till start time: 6 million Internet questions were received; six were chosen for Brokaw to ask tonight. I hope at least 800,000 of those questions came from Rocky readers. I've seen your comments threads. You guys have the aptitude.

4 minutes till start time: I'm putting up the poll now... but at least wait 4.5 minutes before deciding a winner, cool?

2 minutes till the bell: How are they going to do a townhall when they won't even look at each other? This is gonna be fun to watch.

This looks like one of those theatres in-the-round. Hope they'll come out and act "Inherit the Wind."
  • Questions from the audience: Any bets on whether there's a Ronulan planted in there?
  • Tom Brokaw just gave permission for all of you at home to have outbursts. Do him proud.
  • First question from Allen is section A. How cute. Obama's working the crowd. "Worst financial crisis since the Great Depression." Blames Bush administration. And McCain, for deregulation. Make sure rescue package "works properly." Crack down on CEOs for "golden parachutes" (why does that phrase always crack me up?). "Middle class need a rescue package." Taxes, keep jobs, keep homes, health care, energy.
  • Mac's turn: Directly addressing Allen instead of working the crowd so much. Energy independence, low taxes. "Let's not raise taxes on anybody today." Cool! Went from China to home values. Would order secretary of treas. to buy up bad home loans and renegotiate so people can stay in homes. "Is it expensive? Yes!" Yep.
  • Who would Mac appoint as Treasury secretary? "Someone Americans immediately identify with." The next American Idol, maybe? Obama likes buddy Warren... Warren Buffett, that is. Obama's working this like a stump speech.
  • Brokaw tsk-tsks 'em on the rules.
  • Oliver Clark is next... what there is in bailout that would actually help people out? McCain: Because of "greed and excess" on Wall Street, Main Street pays price. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac. Said Oliver probably never head of them before this crisis. Said Obama was second-largest Fannie/Freddie recipient in history. "Match that started this forest fire." Next up Obama... addresses his original question, kind of. Starts explaining need for bailout pretty well, relating it to payroll, and Oliver nods... but he goes back to deregulation and Oliver really couldn't give a hoot about the he said/he said. Says he never reaped Fannie/Freddie benefits.
  • Brokaw: Will economy get worse before it gets better? Obama says no. Coordinate with other countries. Help ordinary families stay in home, health care, energy, yadda yadda. Mac: Depends on if we act effectively. Buy up bad home loans. Said he and other senators sans Obama warned of crisis in a letter. American workers are best in world and need a chance. 
  • Question from Teresa: How can we trust either of you when both parties got us in this mess? (paraphrase) Obama goes to blaming Bush. OK -- so the woman's sick of partisan BS, and he leans on blaming GOP. Will anybody actually get their question answered? Mac is up... touts his maverick reformer credentials, goes into bipartisan record, which actually kind of addresses the point. "Let's look at our record as well as our rhetoric." Touts watchdog organizations' view that liberal Congress is a big-spending one.
  • McCain said pork! Take a drink!
  • Brokaw asks priorities: health care, energy, entitlement reform. Mac: You can work on all three at once. Even Tom won't get his damn questions answered. Obama: Says you have prioritize, but then won't prioritize them. Oh, wait: No. 1, energy; No. 2, health care; No. 3 education??? That wasn't one of the options.
  • First Internet question from 78-year-old Fionna from Chicago: what will you make us sacrifice? Mac: support housecleaning of federal programs, projects, earmarks, etc. Wants spending freeze. Obama's turn: brings up 9/11... thinks Bush's call to stimulate economy was not a call to service. Wants us to save energy in our homes and buy clean American cars. Wants volunteer corps. Community organizer!!
  • Brokaw: How would you make Americans break bad economic habits? Obama: Starts with government cleaning up its act. Stiff the rich, he stresses. Isn't redistribution of wealth a bad economic habit for a supposed democracy to have? Mac: Nailing down Obama's specific proposals was "like nailing Jell-O to the wall." Sen. Obama's secret is that 50% of small biz revenue would get hit with tax increases. Stresses he's not in favor of tax cuts for the wealthy. Tax credits for health insurance. Create jobs and not raise anybody's taxes.
  • Another Internet question about entitlements, Brokaw revises question asking them to address "big ticking time bomb" of Social Security. Obama: take care of it in first term, not two years. Diverts back to tax plan, even though Brokaw had tsk-tsk'd them on sticking to format and topic. McCain wins if he sticks to the friggin' question and addresses entitlements. Obama is blaming Bush -- once Bush cleanup is done, he basically says, you can worry later about Social Security.
  • McCain: Not that hard to fix SS. Said Reagan and Tip did it. Medicare a little tougher. Have a commission to come up with recommendations, like base-closing commission. Then have Congress vote up or down. Then Mac is back to the tax argument.
  • Ingrid Jackson question: would Congress move fast on climate change, environmental stuff, green jobs? Mac: "I disagree strongly with the Bush administration on this issue." Best way of fixing: nuclear power. "Safe and clean, creates hundreds of thousands of jobs." Obama: one of biggest challenges of our time and opportunity. Can create 5 million new jobs with new energy economy, like how computer creation made new jobs. Favors nuclear power "as one component of overall energy mix."
  • Brokaw tells them to mind the damn stoplights to know when their time is up. He's nice and fed up.
  • Question about development investment from Brokaw, which Mac briefly supports then is back to fighting Obama's assertion that he voted against alternative energies. Brokaw's gonna chuck a legal pad soon.
  • Next question from Lindsey Trella: Health care is profitable industry, should it be treated as commodity? Obama: moral and economic imperative to do something. If you have insurance under his plan, OK, if you don't you can get the federal workers' health care. Mac: no government fines to penalize small business on coverage. Under his $5,000 health care tax credit 95 percent of Americans could better their coverage, he says.
  • Brokaw goes back to her question: health care a privilege, responsibility, right? Mac says responsibility. Nervous about government mandates. Obama says it should be a right because our country is wealthy. (Er, not now it ain't.) Brings up mom dying of cancer arguing with insurance companies.
  • Foreign policy! Whee!!
  • Phil Elliott: How will economic instability affect our ability to act as a peacemaker? Mac: It is a challenge, but "America is the greatest force for good in the history of the world." He's in his element now. He's running with it. Has to know when American military power is worth expending. Now it's tangent time. Obama does not understand national security challenges. Obama's turn: Says he doesn't understand how we invaded country that had nothing to do with 9/11, called McCain a cheerleader for war, says it's put "enormous strain on our budget." Says we lost international respect, can't act on Darfur, etc.
  • Brokaw asks about military force in humanitarian crises like Rwanda that don't affect national security. Obama says we have moral obligation. "When ethnic cleansing is happening somewhere in the world and we stand idly by," that knock us down. AHEM... has Obama ever head of Halabja, the genocide of the Kurds, the mass graves left by Saddam??? McCain's turn: says if Obama's quick withdrawal was done in Iraq, would be a mess. "Must do whatever we can to prevent genocide." Requires a "cool hand" who knows what the limits of our capabilities are, uses Somalia as example.
  • Katie Hamm: Should U.S. respect Pakistani sovereignty in going after al-Qaida? Obama: Blames difficult situation in Afghanistan on going into Iraq. Answer her question, dude. She asked about "respecting sovereignty." Obama says we can't "coddle" a dictator. Musharaff's gone, dude. Wants to encourage democracy. Yeah, Barack, the opposition already took over after their election mandate. Mac: Says Teddy Roosevelt speaks softly, Obama speaks loudly. Says getting them to "act in a cooperative fashion" is necessary. Relationship with Pakistan is critical, "get the support of the people... not threaten to attack them."
  • Obama insists quite arrogantly on a follow-up even though it's not part of their mutually agreed debate plan. McCain says he deserves equal time. They fight over "Bomb Bomb Iran" and what Obama said on Pakistan.
  • Brokaw asks about probability of success in Afghanistan. Obama: Get out of Iraq, go to Afghanistan. Mac: Do something like the Iraq surge.
  • Internet question: How to apply pressure to Russia without starting another Cold War? Mac: There won't be another Cold War, but Russia is acting badly because of petrol dollars. Uses the KGB line again. Watch Russia beat up on Ukraine and back their NATO bid. Obama: Can't just provide moral support to former Soviet states but economic support. Says he predicted Georgian crisis back in April. Says we all have to be seers. (Hey Obama: Iran.... Iran.... Iran....). Obama says if we conserve energy it will take away Putin's petrol cash.
  • Brokaw: Is Putin's Russia evil empire? Obama: They have evil behavior and impulses. Mac: "Maybe." If he says yes, he'd reignite Cold War; if says no, ignores their behavior.
  • Terry Shirey question: If Iran attacks Israel, would you support with troops or wait for U.N. Security Council approval? Mac: Don't wait for U.N. Russia and China "would pose significant obstacles." Goes back to Obama meeting with Ahmadinejad without preconditions. (Oh brother, he's gonna wanna fight back...) "We can never allow a second Holocaust to take place." Obama: Can't allow Iran to get nuclear weapon, would threaten Israel. (Yeah, but would you snub the Security Council to do the right thing?) Important to use all tools at disposal before having to make the choices. Reduce energy consumption so Iran has less money.
  • The real question is, if Netanyahu gets back in power would they even need our military forces? :)
  • Brokaw has last (whew) Internet question: What don't you know and how will you learn it? Obama: Wife has list. Expects challenges that you don't expect. Doesn't really answer question but is giving a closing statement at a stump speech. Mac: Doesn't know what all of us don't know... what's going to happen here and abroad. "I know what it's like in dark times." Now it sounds like the end of his convention speech.
  • Some of the audience looked suicidal. They can exhale now. It's over. Now it's press the flesh time.
  • Pundit time: Mort Kondracke said there were no game-changing moments. Bill Kristol: Conventional talking points. Nina Easton: was the "sinking ship of free-market Republicans." Jumped on his really expensive plan to buy mortgages before criticizing Obama for spending. Fred Barnes said it's a mortgage buy-down, not buyout. Barnes thought it was "dreadful," not a real townhall meeting. Barnes has a point -- there've hardly been any other question topics at these debates, such as immigration.
  • Pollster Frank Luntz time: People thought it was interesting. Obama has edge in show of hands. One says Obama answered his questions and McCain didn't. Um, neither of them really did!! They liked Obama's health care response.
  • It's T. Boone Pickens time!! And a George McGovern commercial saying that unions now suck and private ballots are necessary.
 
OK, here's my rundown. You know what the polls will look like tomorrow and the next few days? Exactly what they looked like at 6:55 p.m. MT today. McCain will come out even on the numbers who thought his mortgage bailout was awesome and those who thought he was smoking crack. Obama will come out even on those who bought his health care plan as rosy, and those who started painting Karl Marx beards on Obama photos. If you looked at that townhall setting as average Americans witnessing the politicking, you had a select group who got to ask questions and then couldn't even get their questions answered straight because the candidates preferred to use that time to get at each other's throats. This was not only a tie, it was a joint performance that left you dreading the next month -- and feeling unusually sorry for Tom Brokaw.      


October 3, 2008 10:56 AM

Zardari Macks on Palin

I can't believe I missed this video from U.N. week! New Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari looked a wee touchy-feely with Sarah Palin, but I didn't realize what he'd said to her. Asif may be enjoying the single life now, but not sure if he realizes that Todd Palin could easily knock him into India:




Add to Technorati Favorites

October 2, 2008 7:00 PM

Liveblogging the Palin and Biden debate!

palinbiden.jpg
It's coming... in just a few hours I will be in front of the TV, in front of the computer, chinchilla in lap (well, maybe for half a second before she goes beserk), ready to liveblog this bad boy, right here in this post. Stay tuned...

  • OK, we're rolling. Bailout bill. Biden gets first shot. Blames Bush administration. Bad oversight. "Letting Wall Street run wild." Well, there is absolutely nothing wild about Joe...
  • Biden looks like he's lecturing Gwen. Wants to focus on middle class.
  • Palin is up. Says soccer moms should be asked about the economy. Looking at camera instead of Gwen. "Our economy is failing and our government has not provided sound oversight." Biden giving her a squinty look. Politics aside, country first, etc.
  • The whole dynamic of the VP debate is interesting: Defend your future boss.
  • Good dig by Palin at Obama's party line voting record. Biden is laughing at Palin. 
  • Palin on subprime lending crisis: "Darn right there were predatory lenders." Going back to the soccer mom thing. Wants more government oversight of lending. Capitalists are cringing. "It's not the American people's fault that the economy is hurting like it is." I like blaming Hugo Chavez for anything. Can we blame him and his greedy OPECing?
  • Biden shoots back with McCain's efforts for deregulation and self-regulation. I am kinda wondering if Palin and McCain are on the same page here. Joe asked Joey at a gas station how much it cost to fill up his tank. That's his humanizing anecdote.
  • Palin: "Darn right we need tax relief!" Biden is laughing at her again. Obviously he didn't hear Tammy Bruce on O'Reilly a few minutes ago, talking about how he'll need to play it respectfully to not raise the specter of sexism.
  • What is Biden's teeth whitener? He matches his shirt.
  • Hammering each other on taxes. Palin slips away from Biden's challenge on her take on Obama's voting record and McCain's on budget bill, and starts talking about her mayor and governor ship. Gwen interrupts her and says time to move on. Prolly because Palin dissed the moderator and said she wanted to talk straight to American people.
  • Yes, Joe, we all love the middle class. 10-to-1 he brings up McCain's houses.
  • Palin brings up small businesses among the upper tax brackets. Taxes ain't patriotic, she says. Biden laughs. Damn, those are some pearly artificial whites.
  • Moderator wryly asks, "Are you interested in defending Sen. McCain's health care plan?" Um, yes, Gwen, there's no other reason I'd be hanging out here, she should have answered. Palin brings up credits to buy insurance.
  • Biden on higher taxes on certain brackets. "We don't call that redistribution, we call that fairness." I call that kinda socialist. Steve Forbes, where are you and your flat tax, mi amor?
  • Biden calls McCain health care plan "the ultimate bridge to nowhere." Audience laughs.
  • Promises not able to keep: Gee, in the span of the ordinary presidential campaign, isn't that about 90-95%?
  • Biden answers with what they're going to keep their promises on. Health care, taxes, yadda. What a cockeyed optimist. Palin goes on energy plan, engaging Joe directly. Back to Alaska -- taking on oil companies. Biden laughs. I think I'll start a Biden Laugh-O-Meter. Brings up energy plan that Obama voted for oil tax breaks and she had to pick up the pieces. Gwen asks the promise question of her. Palin: I've only been on the campaign trail five weeks, not time to make many promises.
  • Biden fires back against her tax assertions. 
  • Palin talks about "toxic mess" on Wall Street. I want to see Biden on split screen. He's talking about how he disagreed with Obama. Glass half empty, glass half full. Biden is good and wonkish. Palin talking about energy independence (how are we switching from subject to subject with no new questions?) and right away Biden is laughing!
  • Gwen says it's finally time to actually formally talk about energy. Don't think she likes Palin (or the tangents) very much. Palin goes into climate change. All of the above approach. Biden says climate change is man-made. "If you don't understand what cause is, it's virtually impossible to come up with a solution." Rattling off McCain votes against alternative energies. Palin got in a laugh of her own.
  • Palin brings up the "drill baby drill" chant. Brings up oil and gas in her state. Focusing too much on Alaska-specific stuff. Biden is laughing. Both support capping carbon emissions.
  • Biden talking again about exporting clean-burning coal technology to smog-spewing China. It's not a matter of having the technology; China wants to just take the cheapest route possible.
  • Same-sex marriage: Biden says there will be no difference in couples under Obama administration. Property rights, hospital visitation, etc. Palin: Not if it grows closer and closer to threatening traditional marriage. Then stresses that she's tolerant. Says McCain administration would also support contract, visitation rights, etc. Biden says he doesn't support gay marriage. Leave to the states. 
  • Foreign policy: Duck and cover.
  • Gwen asks about Iraq solution. Palin brings up McCain supporting the surge, Obama not funding troops. Cannot afford to lose with early withdrawal. More troops in Afghanistan with NATO allies.
  • Biden: Obama had "clear plan" to shift power to Iraqis and withdraw troops. Says for McCain "there is no end in sight." Palin: "Um... your plan is a white flag of surrender in Iraq." Says we're done when U.S. commanders feel Iraqis are ready to take over security. They ain't right now, that's for sure.
  • Biden's laughing!! Palin brings up Biden's disagreements with Obama earlier during campaign. Biden: "John McCain voted to cut off funding for the troops." Because of timeline to end war. At least Joe was honest enough to throw that part in.
  • Iran and Pakistan: Egads.
  • Biden: Pakistan is already nuclear. Iran getting "not close to getting a nuclear weapon that can be deployed." He should talk to Bibi. Says terror attack would come from Pak/Afghan, we have to build schools to counter madrassas.
  • Palin: Center of war on terror is in Iraq. Biden smirks. Brings up Israel and crazy Mahmoud's threats to wipe off face of the earth. Loony and can't get nukes. Brings up Obama wanting to meet with them without precondition. Will Biden bring up Kissinger to renew that fight?
  • Uh-oh, Gwen brought up Henry and other secretaries on engaging Iran, etc. Palin brings up her chat with Kissinger. Says sitting down at presidential level unacceptable with peeps who hate the U.S. Biden says not true about Obama, and says Palin not smart if she doesn't know the mullahs run Iran instead of Ahmadinejad. Says if we're not diplomatic our allies wouldn't like us anymore.
  • Now on to Israel: Palin says two-state solution is solution. Says commitment is there and brings up Israel's track record keeping peace agreements. Biden says no one in the Senate is a better friend to Israel than he is. (What about Joe Liebermann????) Says Hezbollah is legitimate part of Lebanese government. Hezbollah is a terrorist organization that has killed U.S. soldiers, suicide bombed the Jewish center in Buenos Aires, and started the war with Israel in 2006 with a cross-border raid.
  • Geez, she's on her excessive partisanship bringing people together thing again. Biden: How different will McCain's foreign policy will be different than Bush. Rattles off country after country. Wants to be respected country.
  • Nuclear weapon: Palin: "Would be the be all, end all of too many people." Says Kim Jong-Il can't get nukes. Diverts to Afghanistan, says surge principles need to be implemented there. Biden responds on Afghanistan that commanding general said surge principles will not work there, spent three weeks of Iraq comparable money on Afghanistan in seven years there.
  • This debate is like Wonk vs. Mom. For reference, see our videos on the pro and con of Amendment 59.
  • Biden really wants to talk about Bosnia. Now he's wagging his pen. Palin is chuckling. Biden on Darfur: "I don't have a stomach for genocide." He's hammering the foreign policy. Knows it's his strong point and she can't bring up soccer games.
  • Palin looking a bit frustrated and reverts to lighthearted talk about being a Washington outsider and not understanding how someone can vote for a war and then be against it. But agrees with him on Darfur. Then she switches right into Alaska natural resources. Line should be drawn on when to go in? Biden says yes, when they're evil enough. I call the line "Never Again."
  • Biden jumps back on supporting the war or not. This debate just goes really badly with the quicko dinner I grabbed from Burger King. I'm not sure these two are even arguing about the same thing half the time.
  • Gwen's next question: If your running mate keels over, what would you do?
  • Biden says that would be a national tragedy of historic proportions. It's also pretty unrealistic. Biden would not to regime change but cooperation and kumbaya. Says it's most important election since 1932.
  • Palin also says God forbid on question. Says they don't always have same opinions. Put government back on the side of the people. They're a "team of mavericks." Talking points, talking points. Biden tries to jump on Main Street points.
  • Is this OVER YET????
  • Palin talking about education. Comes from house full of schoolteachers. I know all of her friends and family by now. Says we need "more flexibility" in No Child Left Behind.
  • Gwen asks about not wanting to be VP cracks or what VP does crack. Palin says she and Biden both made "lame attempts at a joke." I'm so tempted to go the next step here... this is a lame attempt at a debate. Sorry, the rehearsed nature is driving me nuts. Biden is going into his conversations with Barack about the job. Surely these answers bored Obama, too...
  • Gwen asks if VP should be more under legislative branch. Palin: Our founding fathers were smart guys. Agree with Cheney, more flexibility. Biden is laughing. Talks about her executive experience. Biden says that article one of constitution defines VP as executive branch. Primary role to support president. Vote only when there's a tie.
  • Gwen to Palin, you're inexperienced; to Biden, you're undisciplined. Palin is on the Alaska/hockey mom talking points. Idealistic prattling. What was the question again? Biden says his Achilles' heel is his "excessive passion." Bwahaahaaa!! He's back on Bosnia. He really digs Bosnia. Went off on a family story tangent.
  • Biden says just because he's a man doesn't mean he doesn't know what it's like to raise children, to "not know if a child is going to make it." He chokes up. Palin doesn't address this but goes back on the maverick policy to change America.
  • Biden hammers on whether Mac is a maverick. Six minutes left. I can't wait. It's like counting the minutes before getting out of calculus class. Palin is back on mayor and governor. I'm in pain.
  • Something about Jesse Helms and a child with braces. Biden has hit the boring wall. I think this is the "I'm more bipartisan than you" battle, but it's like they've run out of steam and are mired in their rehearsed talking points.
  • Closing statements. Palin: Fight for country, fight for freedom, quote Reagan, it's like she's rehashing her acceptance speech without the cheering crowd. Biden: Change. Change. Change. He seems to have stolen his boss' script. Talks about childhood. Time to get up and blah blah blah.
  • It's over. Buíochas le Dia. Now come the packs of family members and the pundits. It's nice that they're actually hanging out and getting to know each other. Mac and Barack couldn't wait to get away from each other. Let's see what they think. Mort Kondracke: Palin was feisty and informal. Biden at his "soberous best." Thought Palin had better of it. Bill Kristol: Palin held her own. Kirsten Powers: Palin didn't make gaffes
My take on the debate: I wasn't all that impressed. Granted, I prefer hearing politicians going policy point for policy point, and there are other voters who prefer the folksy everymom angle. Biden was wonkish and knowledgeable to my liking, but I'm really turned off by the content of his policies. Nearly all of the Frank Luntz poll group thinks that she won the debate, people saying she was "Main Street America." But one says that she "catered to adorability" and "lacked substance." I think she connected with the audience a lot better than Biden. I think Biden's constant snickering will be spun as condescending. The questions remains, though, if she connected with voters who weren't already liking McCain-Palin. Luntz predicts a big poll bounce after this debate. I tip the debate to Biden as most on point and policyish, but polls may prove that many voters felt otherwise.

(This is how we really know a debate is over now: T. Boone Pickens commercial is on.)

What did you think?


October 1, 2008 2:30 PM

Gwen Ifill, conflict of interest? Cha-ching!

gwenifilll.jpg
Portfolio.com sums it up in a sentence: "It's not often Michelle Malkin has anything worthwhile to add to discussion, but she makes a valid point about Thursday's vice-presidential debate: As moderator, PBS's Gwen Ifill comes in bearing a pretty substantial conflict of interest."

That is, Ifill's book, "The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama," is set to be released on Inauguration Day. States the Amazon description: "In THE BREAKTHROUGH, veteran journalist Gwen Ifill surveys the American political landscape, shedding new light on the impact of Barack Obama's stunning presidential campaign and introducing the emerging young African American politicians forging a bold new path to political power."

Now, lots of debate moderators come into the arena with political opinions and preferred candidates. But Ifill stands to make a lot more money off the book if Obama wins as opposed to if McCain wins (which won't be the "breakthrough" she's talking about). So this is not just an ideological conflict of interest, but a financial one.

It would be no surprise if the McCain campaign didn't adequately vet the moderator. Their track record on vetting isn't golden. Richard A. Viguerie, onetime direct-mail fundraising huckster for Sun Myung Moon, said today, "By agreeing to the selection of Gwen Ifill to moderate the vice presidential debate, despite her obvious conflict of interest regarding the presidential election, Republicans have shown why they are called 'the stupid party.'" Perhaps he can get together with the Colorado Democracy Alliance and educate the idiots about the stupid party.



Add to Technorati Favorites

September 30, 2008 1:08 PM

Ritter takes odd route from Point A to Point B

ritter46.jpg
From Gov. Ritter's press conference yesterday opposing 46 (you know, the opposition conducted partly on state time):

"'We're in a time in this state when we need to do everything we can to keep this economy moving forward. Amendment 46 undercuts Colorado and destroys years of progress on education, health care and workforce development,' Ritter said at a Capitol news conference attended by Hispanic and African American business people, religious leaders and others."

Amendment 46 prohibits discrimination or preferential treatment based on race, ethnicity, gender, etc., in government hiring, education (i.e. college admissions), or the awarding of government contracts. So how did the "health care" make it in there? Is it just convenient use of a scare-word to get voters' attention? Or is it a serious belief that minority physicians are needed to serve minority communities? (At least I think that's what he's getting at.)

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 30, 2008 12:45 PM

Bird labor demands would drive me out of business

gorbyatwork.jpg
This is Gorby, my new diamond dove. After spending a couple of weeks chilling in his cage, I let him out last weekend to spread his wings. And to put him to work: hey, a bird's gotta earn his millet and Aquafina, know what I'm saying? Here you see Gorby busy, stepping on that hated "insert" key, acting as an effective ghostwriter.

But, sadly, it all went downhill from there. First, he wanted an amendment stating that if he slipped and bumped his beak, he could sue me for damages on top of his workers' comp payout. Then, he wanted mandatory vet insurance even though I clearly run a small operation (hamster, chinchilla, parakeet, hermit crab...). On top of all this, he wanted an amendment ensuring that I'd need "just cause" to fire him; he could laze around all day cooing, like he tends to do, and I'd have to take some sort of positive rehabilitation steps with him, losing productivity time, before I could even think about sending him to the birdie Government Millet line.

In the end, I said no thanks -- it was too much of a burden and I'd be better off doing the work myself. He flew up to the top of the computer and pooped on my wireless router.

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 26, 2008 7:03 PM

Liveblogging the presidential debate!

macbarack.jpgComfy PJs: check
Tall Cool Diet Coke: check
A storm about to erupt outside the window: check
Chinchilla: check

All systems are a go -- time to liveblog the presidential debate!

  • Seems like Jim came up with this first question at the last minute. Barack is looking especially stern. He's slamming trickle-down economics.
  • McCain begins by noting Teddy Kennedy is in the hospital. His tie looks like he's a candy striper. Looking calm and collected. But he's probably praying for the foreign policy questions. He's looking more at Lehrer, Obama was looking at home audience.
  • Lehrer asks the two to get back to the financial crisis question and engage each other. Obama is engaging himself.
  • Kennedy's back home from the hospital .. revise opening statement!
  • Obama has really come into this debate on the defensive. He either glowers at or cold-shoulders Mac
  • Fox News is ALREADY asking viewers to text in their votes for who won the debate. Paulestinians are fervently trying to hijack system to vote for Ron Paul.
  • Control spending. Good, Mac.
  • DNA joke falls flat. He's going to veto everything with a dull Sharpie. A decent answer from McCain, but not sure how he's connecting with the audience.
  • Obama acts defensively about earmarks. "Well, I..." Lobbyists: "Well, I..."
  • Mac comes back that Obama switcherooed after deciding to run for president. This after Obama tried an early "Bush's policies" ending. (Oh no, not another Miss Congeniality remark, Mac...)
  • These guys must have really brawled in the bailout negotiations. 
  • McCain lifts up business taxes in Ireland (11 percent) as a shining example.
  • Where did the foreign policy and national security go? I understand that Lehrer wanted to begin with the financial crisis, in the framework of sound fiscal and foreign policy, but now they're arguing the same old shtick about their tax plans.
  • It's this early and they're tangling this much. McCain is smiling and Barack ain't. 
  • Obama should check out Ritter's college cash handout plan. I think he'd dig it.
  • So far it's boiling down to this: Obama wants universal health care and college and more kids in space (+$$$$), and McCain wants to cut spending (-$$$$). Two men with starkly different priorities.
  • Lehrer is good: "So neither of you want to make any major changes in response to the financial crisis?"
  • Spending freeze except veterans programs, defense, entitlements, says Mac. Obama says he'd not like that because he wants early childhood education and an Iraq pullout.
  • Good comeback by Mac on shifting the subject to drilling.
  • WHERE'S THE FRIGGIN' FOREIGN POLICY??!!??
  • Oh no, another Miss Congeniality joke
  • Lessons of Iraq from Mac: no failed strategy. Badly mishandled. Chance to pitch his surge role. Consequences of defeat: increased Iran influence, greater sectarian violence, etc. From Obama: Questions going into war in the first place. Lauded himself for opposing war six years ago (wasn't in Senate yet -- how "risky" was it, politically, seriously??). Rattles off death toll and says al-Qaida is more powerful.
  • Afghanistan: more troops as quickly as possible, Obama says. Mentions border attacks. Wonder if he'll address Pakistan military firing on American troops at the border.
  • Obama: Put pressure on Afghan govt. Kill the poppies. "Deal with" Pakistan. Does he understand it ain't a Musharraf ballgame anymore?
  • Mac: Notes mistake of Soviet lessons in Afghanistan. "If you're gonna pull a gun on someone you better be prepared to pull the trigger." Says he's not willing to fire on Pakistan, so he's not going to threaten them like Obama. Notes new government and scoping out Waziristan. Needing cooperation of people there. Accurately throws in Marriott bombing as warning from terrorists. "I know how to work with them."
  • Obama fires back with Mac's "bomb bomb Iran" song. Oh man, he has no clue why the U.S. is unpopular with many in Pakistan. It's unpopularity with classes that want Sharia, like the MMA party, and rooted in our support of Pervez.
  • God, can they please take a break? This is getting painful. Now they're comparing their bracelets from soldiers' mothers.
  • Obama laments that al-Qaida is still sending out videotapes. That's called having a HandyCam, not a dirty bomb.
  • On to Iran: Mac goes first. Says if Iran gets nukes they wipe out Israel. Can't abide a second Holocaust. Sorry, but if Bibi gets the P.M. slot, Mahmoud might go first.
  • Obama on Iran: Echoes what Mac said about arms race, sanctions. Wants cooperation with Russia and China in doing so. Snowball, meet hell. Wants direct diplomacy with Iran.
  • Obama says Ahmadinejad not most powerful person in Iran. That's right. "So he might not be the right person to talk to." Oh, and Ayatollah Khamenei is going to give in???
  • McCain talking about danger of legitimizing the regime with high-level talks. Obama shaking his head. Mac brings up Albright's embarrassing visit with Kim Jong-Il and the failed promises after that. Now they're fighting over what Henry Kissinger meant by talking with Iran.
  • Oooh, Russia! Name who the current president is, Barack!
  • Vladimir Putin is probably clutching his sides and laughing at Obama's assertion that Russia can be whipped into line by being assertive. And giving supportive back-pats to the Poles.
  • Mac: Called out Obama on Georgia goof about both sides showing strength. But he used another overused quip again (the KGB in Putin's eyes). Showing his foreign policy chops by bringing up crisis of the Orange Revolution govt. in Ukraine.
  • They're competing on who can pronounce the Georgian president's name...
  • Putin is feeling powerful because of petrol dollars? How about because they're rabid nationalists who are allying with every nefarious regime?
  • OMG, Obama turned the question about Russia to climate change.
  • Question: Likelihood of another 9-11. Mac: Less than the day after 9-11, but "we're a long way from safe." Touts his 9-11 Commission. Long way to go with intelligence. No torture. Work with allies. "I know our allies and I can work much more closely with them."
  • Obama: Safer in some ways. "Make sure we're hardening our chemical sites." Doesn't want to spend as much on missile defense as nuclear proliferation. Goes into U.S. being less respected and has to restore image, yadda yadda. Mac gets to fire back: Consequences of defeat and premature withdrawal from Iraq.
  • Solely focused on Iraq? Not exactly true. We did go into Afghanistan first and have not left. Obama wants "broader strategic vision." McCain touts his experience in 20 years of national security and Barack's missteps. Obama laughs. Looks cocky.
  • Now Obama's talking about his Kenyan dad. Dogs on our standing in the world compared to now as compared to then. So concerned with our P.R.
  • McCain brings up POW for the first time. "I know how to heal the wounds of war, I know how to deal with our adversaries, I know how to deal with our friends."
  • Thank God. The end. I'm like in pain by this point.
  • The Fox pundits: Brit Hume says it was "spirited," but no sound bite moment. Fred Barnes says Obama being on the defensive so much shouldn't hurt him. Nina Easton thought Obama got knocked off balance and noticed how McCain shifted economy conversation to spending, though McCain was more relaxed and conversational. Bill Kristol said McCain was on the offensive more and got under Obama's skin at times. Juan Williams thinks Obama was on offensive, but docked him for smirking and butting in too much.
  • 21 fact-check news release by the end from Obama crew as opposed to 16 from Mac's campaign, according to Carl Cameron. Charles Krauthammer, a true punditry badass, calls debate a draw.

Conclusion: I was very, very surprised by this debate. McCain came in with a serious disadvantage from his debate cancellation, then last-minute decision to take the stage. Knowing that McCain came in with deflated P.R. should have boosted Obama's ego, but he came across as too cocky. His steely gaze, glowers, smirks, and interruptions were heads and tails from the cool, collected, outgoing speaker we saw here in Denver. He got rattled at times when McCain went on the offensive. Was it an overconfident night that turned out not-so-right, or is this just not Obama's best forum? McCain was poised yet passionate at the right moments, and didn't quite overdo it with the anecdotes (though he came close). It was odd that it took so much teeth-pulling for Lehrer to get them engaged with each other, but when they did they were certainly at each other's throats. I never thought I'd say this tonight, when rolling my eyes at McCain's decision to finally debate earlier today, but I've got to give advantage to McCain, particularly as talk went from the economy to foreign affairs. But a poll bounce? I seriously doubt it.

What do you think?
 

September 26, 2008 5:30 PM

Did you know that Mark Udall is a Boulder liberal?

MarkUdall.jpgStill being a newbie in this neck of the country, I've been grateful for any Coloradans' tips to help me become familiar with the political landscape. So I was particularly enlightened by this press release passed along to me from the Bob Schaffer campaign (the boldface emphasis is mine):

"ENGLEWOOD - Boulder Liberal Mark Udall criticized Bob Schaffer today for supporting a temporary reduction in the repatriation tax to encourage American companies to move jobs from overseas but Boulder Liberal Udall voted to do the very same thing in 2004.

'Boulder Liberal Mark Udall has done so many flip flops on energy lately that he now can't keep his record on tax policy straight,' said Schaffer for Senate campaign manager Dick Wadhams.  'Boulder Liberal Udall voted the very same way in 2004 that he criticized Schaffer for today.'

Boulder Liberal Udall held a news conference today and criticized Schaffer for supporting a temporary reduction in the repatriation tax in order to encourage American companies to move overseas holdings back to the United States

Boulder Liberal Udall proclaimed that 'Bob Schaffer today said the solution to our problem is a giant tax giveaway for American companies that ship jobs overseas.  It's stunning, but maybe it shouldn't be.'

Boulder Liberal Udall voted for H.R. 4520, the American Jobs Creation Act, on October 7, 2004 which temporarily reduced the tax rate on repatriated income from 35 percent to 5.25 percent for a one year period.

'While trying to shoot down Bob Schaffer, Boulder Liberal Mark Udall turned the gun on himself in a blazing act of hypocrisy and contradiction,' Wadhams said."


Let's hear it for the save/get button on the keyboard!! If I hadn't been told eight times in the span of 200 words, I might have never known that Boulder Liberal Mark Udall is a Boulder Liberal. I feel like an insider already!

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 26, 2008 9:35 AM

Dissent not tolerated: Voicing concerns about Palin

sarahpalin.jpgCall Kathleen Parker my new sister-in-arms: When Sarah Palin went to the U.N. this week to meet her first world leaders (sorry, I'm already cringing), the no-reporters-allowed controversy was clearly intended to shield the VP nominee from likely gaffes. Kathleen Parker writes on NRO today that it was fun while it lasted, but Palin has shown that she's clearly out of her league. Now, in the eyes of Freepers and other conservative faithful, she's suddenly a plant for the left hellbent on sabotage. Never mind where she's really coming from: She wants McCain to win and doesn't think this is the ticket.

And my column on Pajamas Media today, in which I suggested that Bobby Jindal would have been the wiser pick, is drawing similar vitriol. Funny thing is, it wasn't a negative column about Palin, as it's being branded a trash piece, etc., on that site's comments section, but a focus on the positives of Jindal, even though he likely would not have (or did not) accepted the job. Sorry, but I don't look at the emotional frenzy of the base, I just look at the hard qualifications of the candidate. And the comment left there that I should have just "gone shopping" instead of musing upon the wisdom of McCain's pick shows that just because a woman candidate has excited the conservative base doesn't mean that sexism has vanished from the GOP electorate.

Maybe we should all just take a breath. If Dems are accused of voting for Obama simply based on the wave of euphoria without properly vetting his qualifications -- no dissent tolerated -- what does it say when GOP faithful act the same way about the VP pick?

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 23, 2008 12:25 PM

Campaign calls are fun again!

JonVoight.jpg
I'm still getting political e-mails from campaigns in Los Angeles, but this one caught my eye: Phone banking made fun again!

"Jon Voight is so pleased with our efforts to elect Sen John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin to the White House that he is coming to a phone bank to show his support.

You can meet Jon Voight by coming to the Burbank Headquarters, 1903 W. Magnolia Blvd. in Burbank this Thursday at 8:30am and help support McCain-Palin by making phone calls to get voters out to vote."

Unfortunately, that office has really bad parking, so who knows how many volunteers will get in. Meaning they can stick Voight on the phones, and people might actually want to answer those dinnertime calls again!

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 23, 2008 11:04 AM

Campaign 2008 conspiracy theory rumor of the day!

clintonbiden.jpgI had heard this one before, but late last night I received this e-mail through a submission form on my Web site, with no return e-mail (which, as you may know, is in this day and age the equivalent of meeting a shadowy figure in trenchcoat and fedora in a darkened parking garage):

"got an e-mail from a wholly reliable source in Fla and then confirmed with an impeccable source in the Rep Party that the 'O' campaign was going to have Joe Biden step down feigning a heart condition.  Then, Hillary was going to be put in the VP slot!"

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 22, 2008 9:01 PM

Why I can't vote against Amendment 48

I thought long and hard about writing this post, because when we write endorsements here at the Rocky we discuss them first, as a team, and the resultant editorial springs from those discussions. That sure doesn't mean we agree on everything, especially in this hot-button campaign season, but it means we know how to disagree. However, I'm lucky enough to have this forum to reflect on Amendment 48, with the deepest respect to those colleagues who studied the measure and arrived at different conclusions.

For my readers out of the state/country, Amendment 48 would define, in the Colorado constitution, a person from the moment of conception and thus afford that person inalienable basic human rights. We on the board met with both sides. Arguments against the measure range from it being an attempt to overturn Roe v. Wade to something that would ban birth control or in vitro fertilization. Proponents contend that it lays the foundation for important life-related laws, to those related to abortion (to what extent the state could even override federal law) to fetal homicide (come on, Colorado, WHY is there no law against this?), and wouldn't harm cancer patients or women with ectopic pregnancies, as opponents contend.

The Rocky's editorial opposed 48 on the grounds that it would open unknown areas to unknown levels of litigation -- a box of unknowns, basically. I don't argue with that. But the reason I can't oppose the simple declaration of personhood in Amendment 48 is that from a secular, human-rights standpoint I agree with every word.

In defense of the amendment, I stated that I believed 48 set an important bar for basic human rights. Man will be wrangling over the moment that life begins until the end of time, and even more so over what role the state should play in protecting that life. But here's what I see through that cacophony: I see activists howling in defense of reproductive freedom who won't lift a finger to help Chinese women who are not allowed to choose to have a child. I see the stats that indicate up to 90 percent of babies with Down syndrome are aborted after prenatal testing, receiving a death sentence simply for their disability in a society that sets its own benchmark for "normality." I'm repulsed at the rates of involuntary euthanasia in Holland (that country where they're supposed to be so enlightened about "death with dignity"), and the sickening, Nazi-esque Groningen Protocol by which Dutch doctors can kill an infant (most reported cases have been spina bifida patients) if they determine that "quality of life" will be insufficient by their societal benchmark.

The Jerusalem Talmud states "Whoever destroys a soul, it is considered as if he destroyed an entire world. And whoever saves a life, it is considered as if he saved an entire world." Do we as human beings have the right to rank the lives of others as more or less important, worth saving or fit to be destroyed, based on some scale of life stages or embryonic development, by disability or ability? Do we have the right to determine what a "quality of life" is for another, and then treat that life as less valuable if it isn't up to snuff? I wish I could say I don't want to go down that road, but we've already gone down that road. And it tears down our humanity, bit by bit.

Life is deserving of the deepest care and respect from the moment it comes into existence to the moment of death. That's why I not only personally support 48, but Amendment 51 as well (for out-of-towners: a slight sales tax increase to aid woefully underfunded support services for the developmentally disabled) -- because I believe all life has intrinsic value, and I believe in putting my money where my mouth is.

September 21, 2008 11:36 PM

Still wondering about that transportation amendment?

We're on a roll here at Rocky Opinion: You likely noticed that we've already started our endorsements for November's ballot amendments, but we just recently had in an opponents for Amendment 52, which would divert money into a state transportation fund "which may be used only to fund the construction, maintenance, and supervision of public highways in the state, giving first priority to reducing congestion on the Interstate 70 corridor." We had in Rep. Cory Gardner early in our editorial board process, and just recently Rep. Jack Pommer dropped by to give an opposing view. Both offered interesting perspectives, so take a peek:



September 17, 2008 11:51 AM

So funny, it deserves linkage all by itself

"Sarah Palin's Murderous Web of Death" by the Web's resident unicorn expert, Greg Gutfeld:

"...Alarmingly, Sarah Louise Heath Palin was born on February 11, 1964 - a suspicious beginning, as it is also the forty-eighth anniversary of the arrest of the free-thinking 'first-wave feminist' Emma Goldman, for lecturing on the benefits of... birth control.

This 'coincidence' could be easily dismissed, if poet and woman Sylvia Plath had not committed suicide one year (to the day) prior to the birth of Palin. Whether Palin was aware of this fact as a child isn't known - and whether the banning of the book 'The Bell Jar' was actually discussed with her parents cannot be said for certain, but there had to be a reason why both mother and father landed comfortable jobs at various schools of learning - convenient locations that gave them easy access- not simply to books - but to bells, jars, and to children as well.

...One must wonder if George Orwell would have seen the irony in Palin winning the Miss Wasilla Pageant, for it happened, of course - in 1984, only a few miles from a local animal farm. Eerily, this is the same year that Richard Ramirez, also known as the Night Stalker, claimed his first victim. Whether Palin was in contact with Ramirez at the time cannot be verified, but when Palin finished second runner-up in the Miss Alaska pageant, it is unlikely that the outcome sat well with either of them. Few experts know what drives serial killers to kill serially - but later, Palin winning the 'Miss Congeniality' award, must have been icing on the cake.

A very deadly cake, one might add. With murderous frosting. Made of death. ..."


You gotta read the whole thing. Really. And the comments of those HuffPo readers who utterly fail to grasp political satire.

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 16, 2008 12:58 PM

What would Palin have named you?

sarahpalin.jpg
OK, this is pretty funny: The Sarah Palin baby name generator. Enter your name, and it tells you what the woman who has kids named Track and Trig might have named you! Mine was Goalie Sanka Palin. That's so hockey mom.

Though being an Inglewood, Calif., native, I'm still partial to the Pimp Name Generator.

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 16, 2008 10:30 AM

The pro and con of Amendment 59

And speaking of YouTube and its impact on the election, here are our pro and con videos from Amendment 59 (the Savings Account for Education or TABOR deconstruction, depending on whom you speak to). Watch and judge for yourself:








Add to Technorati Favorites

September 16, 2008 9:53 AM

The YouTube Election

It may seem like YouTube has been with us forever, but that crazy video-sharing wonderland actually was founded in February 2005 -- making this the first presidential election where YouTube (which in January reported more than 3 billion video views) could be a key factor in the race. When politics is whittled down to who has the better message, few mediums get unfiltered messages out to the viewing public faster and with greater reach. And it's definitely not just the campaigns or the media outlets crafting the most effective videos. Here's one that was forwarded to me:




Note the 7.4 million views, plus the fact that the video has only been up for 2 1/2 weeks. Links, embedding on blogs, word of mouth all drive traffic on these grass-roots campaign messages, and the political landscape may never be the same.

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 13, 2008 11:24 PM

Low roller rolls into town ahead of gaming measure

blackhawk1.jpg
Last week, as many ballot amendment proponents and opponents came through our editorial board, a private citizen and local attorney named Jon Anderson showed up to voice his opposition to Amendment 50, which would: 1) allowing cities to raise limits on gaming to $100 bets, 2) allow the extension of casino hours (all-nighters, baby!), and 3) allow roulette and craps. Coming from California, aka Land of Much Fruitful Indian Gaming, I decided to drop the top and head up to Black Hawk on our sunny Saturday in the name of Amendment 50 research. And in the name of penny slots.

Anderson brought up during the meeting that Black Hawk gaming had exploded beyond the intended preservation of historic buildings, like above, into the "new" Black Hawk area, when you first drive into town, with larger, modern casinos such as the Riviera, and whatever this monstrosity under construction is:

blackhawk2.jpgHonestly, I'm not sure folks should be too concerned about future casino expansion there, because there seems to be no room left. They'd have to start blasting away mountainsides. But, of course, this doesn't mean that gaming wouldn't boom in other areas once casinos are lured in by higher betting limits. Voters have to decide for themselves if this is a good or bad thing. Heaven knows communities get revenue. And we've seen how gaming has helped tribes attain more than self-sufficiency.

My theory on Indian gaming, by the way, is: The U.S. government treated the Indians like dirt, gave them the worst parcels of land in the country and the concession of sovereignty. Tribes eventually use that sovereignty to grow mega-casinos. Tribes have the last laugh. Enough said. But with that sovereignty came the overriding of California's strict anti-smoking laws: whenever in Indian casinos there, the smoke was so bothersome I'd be relegated to the non-smoking room that had like one video poker machine. At least Black Hawk was smoke-free, except for the cluster outside the front door of each casino, puffing away.

All in all, I lost eight dollars. Turns out the penny slot doesn't exactly cost a penny, when you can bet up to 25 lines. At one point I won 200 pennies, which sounds juicier than $2, but I kept on playing. I'm just not a very good casino customer, because I get bummed and bored after the loss of a few dollars. OK, OK, it's because I knew that Colorado Mills was just down the hill, and I had to get to the sure-bet sales. Pairs of Seven jeans found for $40? All sweaters marked down to ten bucks at Eddie Bauer? One pair of cold-weather booties left on clearance in exactly my size? That's the jackpot, baby.

September 11, 2008 10:09 AM

Too... many... ballot... amendments... *gasp*!

No... more... must eat... must sleep... must find time to play with chinchilla...

Today we had Joe Blake from the Chamber in to record his video arguments against the union amendments (53, 55, 56, 57, fiftywhatever), then Jon Anderson in here to oppose Amendment 50 before your esteemed editorial board and on video (though in defense of the casinos, I must say that if I'd gone to Black Hawk to play penny slots last weekend I wouldn't have broken my little toe on a shopping cart at Target), then the No on 48 campaign also appearing before your esteemed edit board and on camera.

Tomorrow... Yes on 48, Yes on 51, and more. Must... rest... toe! And chug lots of Diet Coke!

Bear in mind, however, that my whining does not in any way excuse those amendment folk who still have to come in and shoot their videos. That means you, Amendment 59. ;)

And enjoy what we've done so far at the Rocky Opinion on YouTube, where the latest user comments include a screed against Amendment 47 and the totally random "tom lucero's a stud!"


Add to Technorati Favorites

September 10, 2008 2:46 PM

Jokes about Palin executing her own daughter aren't nice

Was1896725.JPG
Good LORD, this campaign's getting beyond ugly!! Pigs and lipstick aside, check out this tidbit from the UK about Russell Brand, the "comedian" who hosted the MTV Video Music Awards the other night, complaining that the evil MTV censors made him pull some jokes. Like this gem:

"He said: 'I had John McCain gags pulled. And they asked me to tone down the gags about Sarah Palin. I wanted to say she was forcing her teenage daughter to have a baby because she is so anti-abortion.

'But also, as a Republican she is pro-execution so she is going to give her the electric chair for being a little slut.

'They weren't keen on that one.'"


Congrats, MTV, for having some taste. Now about honoring Brit-Brit's music...

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 10, 2008 12:22 PM

Um, McCain doesn't wear lipstick

Was1896582.JPG
I'd like to encourage a new trend this campaign season: Double-checking one's campaign signs to make sure they convey the actual meaning one is trying to convey!

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 9, 2008 9:58 AM

Obama has lost his mojo

AustinPowers.jpg
So theorizes Thomas Defrank, Washington bureau chief at the NY Daily News:

"So once the GOP's postconvention bounce and Palinmania subside - and they will - how does Obama get the mojo back?

By sticking to his blueprint, painting McCain as a third Bush term, relentlessly hammering home bread-and-butter economic issues - and a debate performance on Sept. 26 as compelling as his Denver acceptance speech.

For all the Palin hoopla, not much has changed strategically. McCain still slogs under the same heavy baggage as before the St.Paul convention: an unpopular war and even more unpopular President, a sputtering economy and predatory gas prices."



See, I think the reason that Obama finds himself in this position is that he never really had a hard-and-fast blueprint in the first place. Independents wanted to hear his specific policy plans, not the change rhetoric that grew more redundant and tiresome than the Carpenters' Christmas album. I also think he's played soft on those policies so that those of us in the middle wouldn't see how far he wanted to go to the left on economic issues, et al. I also don't think the "McCain as Bush, Part Three" argument will stick with a lot of people who understand this is a brand-new ticket, and not even the candidate that the GOP establishment would have originally preferred. (Trust me, I took a lot of heat on talk shows last winter for suggesting McCain should get the nomination.)


But will Obama be able to beat McCain in a debate? He'd better not replace that lost mojo with arrogance or condescension, which he seems to turn to when he gets flustered. And on the foreign policy questions, he'll get flustered. We saw it with the Hillary debates.

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 9, 2008 9:21 AM

Barack, are you running against Mac or Palin?

Was1891109.JPG
"I invented change first!" "No, I invented change first!" "I'll bring real change!" "No, don't steal my slogan, I'll bring real change!!"

That was just a quick recap of what the presidential campaign has turned into this week. Perhaps shocked by McCain's unmistakable poll bounce ("What? How can anyone like their change better than my change??"), Obama has gone on the offensive against Sarah Palin, leaving one to wonder who are the presidential and vice presidential candidates, really. It's change you can be confused in.

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 5, 2008 2:48 PM

King of the Nielsen hill!

Was1869000.JPG
Wow! Turns out that "An Evening in Barackopolis" wasn't the biggest ratings draw of the convention. John McCain not only beat Obama in the Nielsen ratings by roughly half a million viewers for his acceptance speech last night, but scored the most-watched acceptance speech ever. In fact, both beat "American Idol."

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 5, 2008 2:44 PM

If you haven't been to Rocky Opinion on YouTube yet...

... don't miss it: The ballot measures are duking it out over video ratings!!

September 4, 2008 9:48 PM

Hence the dramatic flair in McCain's speech

Apparently it was written, at least in part, by screenwriter, producer and director ("The Hanoi Hilton" among his credits) Lionel Chetwynd, a very familiar name among GOP circles in Hollywood. (And yes, I just came from there, and there are more conservatives in H'wood than one might think.) Add this to convention help from Robert Duvall, Jon Voight, Robert Davi, Fred Thompson, etc., and the RNC this week was basically like a big meeting of the Wednesday Morning Club, minus the standard salmon dish and creme brulee at the Four Seasons.

September 4, 2008 8:34 PM

Liveblogging the McCain speech

mccainspeech.jpg
  • I'm just grateful that, unlike the past two nights, I've actually finished my dinner before anybody starts describing torture in detail. I caught the Cindy McCain speech -- can't get much better than Bangladeshi orphans and Rwandan genocide (a Dem president's ball-drop) survivors in one speech. That's close to the color of dress Michelle Obama wore, btw. I wonder if they did a first-lady dress focus group.
  • The McCain montage movie, narrated by Robert Davi, was like Mama McCain telling us to vote for Mac. That's a bit too mama's boy.
  • Fred Thompson plays the Voice of God announcing McCain's entrance into dark arena. McCain comes out to a spotlight like a game-show host.
  • Nice tie, Mac! He looks younger tonight.
  • Two rude interrupters thus far: one, Iraq vets against the war T-shirt guy. Chanted down with "USA." Next was a Code Pinker with a floor pass wailing her head off twice. Mac makes a good quip to the audience about ignoring the static. Code Pinker tries fighting with security, hoping some flashbulbs pop off. Why do all Code Pinkers look the same? Maybe it's the bitter snarl.
  • Good speech format with the runway. Still photos will look like he's in a sea of faithful.
  • Not a Greek column in sight, btw.
  • Good hat tip to Obama and the Obama Flock (TM). Not sure the convention crowd liked it but it will work well for the TV crowd.
  • He hit domestic policy before foreign policy... sure that was intentional!
  • He's kicking Russia's ass now. Cool.
  • "I know how the world works." This is where he reaches thru the TV screen and slaps Obamaniacs.
  • Veterans have place of honor up front. Stresses how he hates war and how he'll work to keep other families from going with it. This is a good speech.
  • Will Obama sue Mac for trademark for hijacking his Change (TM)?
  • Several bipartisan plugs. Reminding peeps of his maverick roots.
  • No more "my friends"!!! No mas! No mas!
  • The crowd really shouldn't have laughed at McCain being greeted by angry VietCong.
  • Nice... I finished my dinner a full half hour before torture talk.
  • He saved emotional part for the end of the speech... smart
  • Either his speechwriter is better than Obama's, or Mac's speechwriter just had more material to work with
  • Great part -- quit whining and get working if you're upset with America.
  • Everybody's starting to tear up... this is his moment
  • That was THE moment to end on, actually...
  • Damn, I wanna play with balloons. Heart's "Barracuda" playing is obviously a nod to Sarah.
  • Obama may have cited Lincoln in his speech, but the GOP convention actually HAS Abe in attendance... a few of them, actually

September 3, 2008 10:33 PM

The Rudy & Sarah Hour

rudyrnc.jpg
There is one thing I'm sick of at the RNC: those cheesy big-screen Hallmark scenic backdrops. There is one thing I never tire of: watching the Republicans boogie to Earth, Wind & Fire (aw, "Dancing in September," how appropo!), etc., during the speech breaks. I'm kind of surprised that even Fox News didn't show Romney and Huckabee's speeches. But they were waiting for the big guns.

Now, Rudy Giuliani's a bit of a nut: Read the story of when I interviewed him one-on-one last fall, and he started playing one-on-one with water bottles and a trash can. His campaign went from sizzle to fizzle, and I was there at the Reagan Library when he threw in the towel and threw his weight behind John McCain.

His speech really was good, getting at the terrorism angle without leaning on all the 9-11 plugs that made him one-note on the campaign trail. He made great foreign policy points on the Mideast crisis, likely reminding Jewish voters why he was Haaretz's pick as the best candidate for Israel for so long. He was, in short, back in top form. And no cell call from Judith.

Sarah Palin really fired up the crowd. OK, that would be an understatement -- the majority of delegates would have dropped their signs and joined her on a tundra moose hunt if she'd just said the word. Not a lot of policy points, but more of an introduction and some clever hits at Obama. She seemed a bit nervous starting out, but settled into the rhythm and ad-libbed at parts, feeding off the crowds and her folksy storytelling. I'm not going to say it was a fantabulous speech, because I've been critical of Obama for being lightweight on policy points as well, but let's just say the debate with Biden is going to be one to watch.

September 3, 2008 4:59 PM

Sarah Palin speech excerpts (oh no, she said 'hockey mom'!)

Sarah Palin.JPG
Here are the first excerpts provided by the RNC of Sarah Palin's speech tonight:

"...I had the privilege of living most of my life in a small town. I was just your average hockey mom, and signed up for the PTA because I wanted to make my kids' public education better. When I ran for city council, I didn't need focus groups and voter profiles because I knew those voters, and knew their families, too. Before I became governor of the great state of Alaska, I was mayor of my hometown. And since our opponents in this presidential election seem to look down on that experience, let me explain to them what the job involves. I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a 'community organizer,' except that you have actual responsibilities."

"...I'm not a member of the permanent political establishment. And I've learned quickly, these past few days, that if you're not a member in good standing of the Washington elite, then some in the media consider a candidate unqualified for that reason alone. But here's a little news flash for all those reporters and commentators: I'm not going to Washington to seek their good opinion - I'm going to Washington to serve the people of this country."

"...Our opponents say, again and again, that drilling will not solve all of America's energy problems - as if we all didn't know that already. But the fact that drilling won't solve every problem is no excuse to do nothing at all. Starting in January, in a McCain-Palin administration, we're going to lay more pipelines...build more nuclear plants...create jobs with clean coal...and move forward on solar, wind, geothermal, and other alternative sources. We need American energy resources, brought to you by American ingenuity, and produced by American workers."

"...Here's how I look at the choice Americans face in this election. In politics, there are some candidates who use change to promote their careers. And then there are those, like John McCain, who use their careers to promote change."

Let's score this under the Square State drinking game:

  • Hockey mom: I'm counting that under "down-homey aphorism." Take a gulp!
  • Alaska governor reference: take a sip!
  • Joke about her experience: celebratory toast!
So far, that's not even a beer buzz...

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 3, 2008 2:28 PM

Mitt, Huck, Rudy speak at RNC

gopnods.jpg
I'm sitting here with e-mail after e-mail from the RNC popping into my inbox, with excerpt after excerpt from the forthcoming speeches on Nomination Rejects Night at the Republican National Convention. So I'll share the fun with you peeps:

Mike Huckabee: "Maybe the most dangerous threat of an Obama presidency is that he would continue to give madmen the benefit of the doubt. If he's wrong just once, we will pay a heavy price."

Mitt Romney: "Liberals would replace opportunity with dependency on government largesse. They would grow government and raise taxes to put more people on Medicaid, to work requirements out of welfare, and to grow the ranks of those who pay no taxes at all. Dependency is death to initiative, risk-taking and opportunity. It's time to stop the spread of government dependency to fight it like the poison it is! It's time for the party of big ideas, not the party of Big Brother!"

Rudy Giuliani: "And as we look to the future never let us forget that - when we are at our best - we are the Party that expands Freedom. We began as a party dedicated to freeing people from slavery... And we are still the party that is willing to fight for freedom at home and around the world. We are the party that wants to expand individual freedom and economic freedom... because we believe that the secret of America's success is not central government, it is self-government. ...And we are the party that believes unapologetically in America's essential greatness - that we are a shining city on the hill, a beacon of freedom that inspires people everywhere to reach for a better world."

Then Rudy's cell phone rings: "Oh, hi, honey, did you know I'm giving a speech? Oh, you're right up in the balcony? Oh, chuckle chuckle!!"

Add to Technorati Favorites

September 2, 2008 8:47 PM

No Zell Miller, but may entice moderates

lieberman.jpg
Simply put, Honest Joe's speech was not geared toward the GOP delegates, who all in all needed some pep pills this evening. It was geared toward the moderates and Democrats watching at home, with Lieberman often looking straight into the camera, and the senator made a point of referring to himself several times as a Democrat. It was plainspoken, nothing fancy, few fireworks, heartfelt, with a few humorous touches thrown in. It even praised Bill Clinton for his bipartisanship. It was no angry Zell, but John McCain's BFF (even using that phrase I've come to dread: "my friends...") making a solid case to the undecided or those leaning in the Obama direction. I'm sure reviews will be mixed, but Lieberman was exactly where he needed to be: not pretending to be a Republican, not dissing Dems just to get a rise out of the crowd, and stressing that there are some things more important than party.

September 2, 2008 8:42 PM

The resurrection of the Fredheads

fred thompson.jpg
Let me just say: If Fred Thompson had been this awake during the primaries, he'd likely be the GOP nominee. The speech was lively, hit a lot of the right notes, and would have been better if I hadn't been eating dinner while Thompson was describing John McCain's torture in detail.

August 31, 2008 10:02 PM

Will Gustav make Republicans wish for Jindal as VP?

jindalgustav.jpg
Katrina de ja vu is bearing down on the Gulf Coast as I write this, but there's a big difference between preparations now and preparations three years ago. Mayor Ray Nagin, President Bush, and FEMA all had a lesson to learn after the last vicious hurricane smacked New Orleans, but Gov. Kathleen Blanco also contributed to the mangling of Katrina efforts. On the phone with Geraldo Rivera on Fox News a bit ago, she tried to take credit for putting into place the preparations for Gustav in what just seemed like a sad attempt to steal credit for today's picture-perfect evacuations from Gov. Bobby Jindal.

Considered by many to be on John McCain's shortlist for the vice presidential slot (remember he was part of McCain's exclusive pre-Memorial Day barbecue), Jindal insisted he had a job to do in Louisiana and wouldn't accept the position if offered.

As Gustav approaches his state, though, it seems that Jindal is exhibiting the kind of leadership skills that transcend party politics -- the kind of executive leadership that has become an issue in the presidential race, but in the sense that most of the top four lack the experience.

Today we've witnessed a historic event: the evacuation of nearly two million residents from the Louisiana coast. Buses and trains got residents the heck out of Dodge -- and there were enough for everyone who wanted to get out -- and highway lanes were switched to one-way to facilitate the exodus of cars. Sunday evening Jindal was asking for 16,000 additional National Guard troops from neighboring states, after activating all 7,000 of Louisiana's. Additionally, the state took a special interest in evacuating those with special needs, and had secured 53,000 places in eight states

And Jindal's press briefings and Web site have been the one-stop shop on where to go for storm info. Site visitors are prompted to prepare, volunteer, or donate; alerts from the state's emergency office are atop the page; and all of Jindal's comprehensive press briefings are available. We're talking hard stats, complete organization, knowing what's going on with every sector of the evacuation and preparation process.

When voters talk about desiring a candidate who's ready to lead, the proven ability to handle a crisis is such a huge part of that -- especially after the Katrina calamity rattled the faith of so many in their government. By the end of the week, many may be futilely pining for Jindal to be on a ticket this November. But I predict in the future we'll see Jindal at the top of a ticket -- and then he'll be making history not just with an impeccable, massive evacuation, but going where no Indian-American has gone before.

Add to Technorati Favorites

August 29, 2008 12:15 PM

People in glass campaigns shouldn't throw stones

mccainpalin.jpgHere's the Obama campaign's reaction to John McCain's VP pick of Sarah Palin (one of the few picks that could have stolen Obama's speech thunder this moring):

"John McCain put the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency. Governor Palin shares John McCain's commitment to overturning Roe v. Wade, the agenda of Big Oil and continuing George Bush's failed economic policies -- that's not the change we need, it's just more of the same," said campaign spokesman Bill Burton.

But you want to put a former state senator and junior senator with zero foreign policy experience directly into the Oval Office? At least Palin's been a governor for two years, which is more executive experience than Obama, McCain, and Biden combined.

So look at it: Both Palin and Obama are young. Both have served limited periods in elected office. If experience concerns you, is it better to have the inexperience in the No. 1 slot on the ticket, or the No. 2?

This response on a blog from a Hillary Clinton-backer/PUMA:

Speaking as a lifelong Democrat who has marched FOR a woman's right to choose:

Palin's stance on abortion will NOT keep me from supporting a McCain-Palin ticket.

I will take my chances on the abortion issue because I believe Barack Obama presents much greater dangers to the country.

PUMA for McCain-Palin!


My guess is the Obama campaign is a wee nervous this morning, especially after they took flack for not even vetting Hillary for the VP slot. I'll also guess that Hillary is really steamed right now.

Add to Technorati Favorites

August 28, 2008 1:43 PM

GOP VP here in the DNC city?

pawlenty.jpg
OK, time to toss out my own rumor on McCain's pick, which should come tomorrow just in time to burst Obama's mile-high bubble: Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, with whom we at the editorial board were supposed to meet this afternoon, just canceled all of his appointments today.

Hmmmmmmmmmm.....

Add to Technorati Favorites

August 23, 2008 8:44 AM

We've all been waiting for Joe

I'm really cracking up at an anonymous comment left on Gateway Pundit's post about Biden:

"We are one's we have been waiting for!"

We've been waiting for Joe Biden?

The entry page of Obama's Web site currently says "Barack Obama I Change We Can Believe In I Contribute." Get out that change, sayeth the anointed one!

obamabiden.jpgIsn't it really the funniest thing ever to see Joe's face superimposed over all those "change" signs? John McCain should start picking out a new BBQ grill for the Rose Garden patio. It's Christmas in August for the GOP.

August 22, 2008 10:57 PM

So Joe Biden is 'change'?

biden.jpgOh, my my my my... remember this was the guy who marveled about Barack Obama being "the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy"? The AP is reporting that Joe Biden is Obama's No. 2, and that the text message will be sent out Saturday morning (does this mean some Dems won't answer their phone now?). ABC News reported late tonight that Secret Service had been dispatched to Biden's home, so either he's been printing counterfeit bills in the basement or needs executive-wannabe-level protection.

For a campaign that has consistently chided John McCain for being mired in the old Washington guard and conducting the "same old Washington politics," Obama's choice is bizarre. Joe Biden, change?? Biden, the sixth-longest-serving and notoriously long-winded senator? Biden, who was named a Face for the Future by Time magazine in his freshman senatorial year -- in 1974, before I was even born? Biden, who withdrew from the 1988 presidential race after speech-plagiarizing and school-grade-exaggerating scandals? Biden, who snagged a whopping 1% of Iowa delegates in January?

And finally -- and this is my favorite one -- Joe Biden, who suggested on March 16, 2004, on "Hardball" that John Kerry pick John McCain as his running mate:

"'I think that this is time for unity in this country, and maybe it is time to have a guy like John McCain -- a Republican -- on the ticket with a guy he does like. They do get along. And they don't have fundamental disagreements on major policies.'

When asked by Matthews if he would support such a ticket, Biden said, 'I would. Yeah, if John Kerry said that's who he wanted, and McCain -- I'd encourage McCain to say yes. I doubt whether John would do it. I doubt whether John McCain would do it. But, you know, we need some unity here, man. The red states and the blue states -- we've got to have something to coalesce around here.'"
 
So we can conclude that Obama has picked a real winner: A guy who's about as Washington Establishment as Washington Establishment can get, who's never been near successful in his bids for the White House, who once called him a "clean" African-American, and who believes that John McCain is a great unifier.

I'd better stop laughing so hard before the neighbors start rapping on my wall...

UPDATE: Jennifer Rubin at Pajamas Media wonders if Obama's been running on the mantra that experience doesn't matter, why'd he go for the guy with the most experience he could find?

The Politico reminds us of another un-PC Biden zinger: "You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin' Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent."

A Huffington Post blogger begs Joe to keep his foot outta his mouth.

Jonah Goldberg writes, "Barack Obama has just picked his Dick Cheney." That's some serious voodoo.

UPDATE NUMERO DOS: Welcome, NRO readers, as well as Gateway Pundit readers, RCP readers, Pajamas readers, etc. -- check out our expanded DNC Opinion coverage here.

August 22, 2008 2:49 PM

A labor-intensive week at the editorial board

Check out our latest Rocky Tube videos dealing with labor issues on the November ballot: Kelley Harp of A Better Colorado advocating the Right-to-Work amendment, and Jess Knox from Protect Colorado's Future speaking in support of the Just Cause and Colorado Corporate Fraud initiatives. (Programming notes: The statements offered in all of our videos are uncut. The only editing is the questions I'm asking sans microphone from behind the camera. We insert the flip cards to give the viewers an idea what they're responding to.)

Enjoy!!






Add to Technorati Favorites

August 22, 2008 11:39 AM

In case you were still waiting for that Obama text message...

... this popped up here in the Commentary department today:

obamahick.jpgI'd say "Chet Edwards WHO??" ... but people are saying that anyways!

Add to Technorati Favorites

August 20, 2008 3:47 PM

Ward Connerly visits our editorial board on Amendment 46

This is the drill whenever someone visits our editorial board pitching a ballot issue nowadays: First, they get recorded on professional equipment, so that closer to campaign time Rocky readers will get to hear the arguments straight from the horse's mouth. Then, I pull the key players aside for some studio time, so proponents and opponents can make pitches directly to the voters.

Here's the newest video in our campaign stash: Ward Connerly speaks in support of Amendment 46, the Colorado Civil Rights Initiative. Stay tuned for more pro and con arguments from Rocky Tube...



Add to Technorati Favorites

August 20, 2008 3:05 PM

Giuliani to keynote Republican convention

rudymac.jpeg
I'm a little befuddled by this choice: Wasn't the reason that Rudy dropped out of the race to begin with because he'd lost all steam and relevancy with Republican voters? No "rising star" speaker like Bobby Jindal, mirroring the effect that Obama had at the last DNC?

It's all fun and games until Giuliani's wife calls his cell phone during the speech...

Add to Technorati Favorites

August 18, 2008 2:15 PM

First they want two days of volunteer work, then they'll charge five bucks for a hot dog?

With props to TalkLeft, a list of some of the items that those lucky Obama ticket-holders won't be able to bring into Invesco Field. My comments are in bold:

• "Outside food [popcorn, six bucks!] and beverage of any kind, including alcoholic beverages, coolers and bottled water [I smell a bottled-water ripoff in the works]
• Umbrellas (in case of inclement weather, the public is encouraged to bring raincoats or ponchos) [the last person to be killed by an umbrella was Georgi Markov on the Waterloo Bridge]
• Large bags, suitcases or backpacks [trying to keep out the laptops?]
• Noisemakers, air horns, whistles, cowbells, horns, bull horns or other voice enhancement devices. [no cowbell??]
• Signs, banners, flags or any other items that would either obstruct the view of a patron or serve as a security risk [translation: by banning all signs, we can avoid being labeled as free-speech foes for trying to keep Hillary or McCain signs out of the view]
• Any and all unauthorized merchandise, including unapproved pamphlets, handouts, advertisements, etc. [unapproved pamphlets? OK, Politburo!]
• Knives of any size, razor blades or sharp and/or pointed objects like scissors, knitting needles, etc.
• Mace/pepper spray or aerosol containers
• Fireworks
• Weapons of any kind, including toy weapons, or any article that might be used as a weapon and/or compromise public safety as well as canes, chains, sticks of any length (non-medical use canes [how do they prove a cane is or isn't for medical use? kick it out and see if the user can walk?]
• Screwdrivers or Leatherman brand or similar tools
• Dangerous or hazardous items or materials including chemical, biological, radiological, etc. [City Council already took care of that pesky poo or pee]
• Animals (except service dogs & guide dogs) [this is why I won't go: love me, love my chinchilla]
• Folding chairs
• Laser devices
• Tripods
• Bikes, inline skates, skateboards, scooters, shoes with wheels
• Illegal drugs and any other illegal substances
• Frisbees or inflated balls of any kind [no Beach Blanket 'Bama?]

INVESCO Field at Mile High policy for this event prohibits strollers or baby seats from being taken into the stands or left in section entrances. [no worries... you can just leave them at the Kids Tent with your local neighborhood anarchists]

The camera policy is as follows: Cameras with lenses less than 75mm and small hand-held video cameras are permitted, provided they do not obstruct the view of other attendees [or be able to film any spontaneous protest actions]. Professional cameras or any other audio/video recording equipment are not allowed to be brought in to the stadium unless the user has the appropriate Convention press credential."


Like Mel Brooks in "Spaceballs," I smell moichandising, moichandising, moichandising! Is it raining? OK, you weren't allowed to bring in your umbrella. But try on this lovely poncho complete with Obama mug for, say, a mere $35. Volunteer for 24 hours straight, and receive a 10 percent discount...

Add to Technorati Favorites

August 15, 2008 5:36 PM

Latest viral video from Rocky opinion



Hey, it could catch on more than Obama Girl or Paris for President. But, hey, our editorial-board-studio videos do give Colorado voters an exclusive peek inside the pro and con sides of the myriad ballot measures.

Stay tuned for our Friday afternoon edit board visitor: Ward Connerly, in support of Amendment 46 and making the case against Initiative 82 (that's all of the affirmative action stuff).

Add to Technorati Favorites

August 13, 2008 2:02 PM

Watch Rocky opinion on YouTube!



Could campaign season get any more exciting?!? The pro folks and con folks on the various ballot measures have been coming through the Rocky's editorial board, and we've been getting them on camera in the Rocky studio explaining their initiatives. So far, we've got Gov. Ritter and Dan Hopkins facing off on the oil and gas taxation initiative, and Tom Lucero going up against campaign contributions on no-bid government contracts. Today Jon Caldera stopped by to argue for Amendment 49, which would stop governments from doing payroll deductions for private interests. And Friday, Andrew Romanoff, who probably also went to high school in MC Hammer's heyday, is stopping by to film a few words about his TABORnating. Stay tuned!

Add to Technorati Favorites

July 30, 2008 10:44 PM

While there were important things happening in the world...

parishilton.jpg
Tonight, on Yahoo News, I witnessed a heavy headline stretched across the entire top of the page stating "McCain camp compares Obama to Spears, Hilton."

I kept checking back the rest of the evening because I was sure that there'd been some mistake. Not that the reporting was erroneous, but that it was being considered important news. Instead, the hed stayed up, along with a pic of Mac Daddy campaigning in Aurora, with AP updates noted as they came in.

Mind you, filling the entire top of the news page with a single story and heavy headline usually indicates something of great importance, such as:

  • Natural disaster wipes out small American farm town
  • Terrorist bombing inflicts a sizable death toll
  • Landmark Supreme Court rulings or election results
  • "American Idol"
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger sparks wildfire with a cigar

McCain's ad aside, methinks Obama is as spoiled by the media as Paris is by Rick and Kathy Hilton. (Plus, could Barack have done "The Simple Life"? Especially for that many seasons??)

Add to Technorati Favorites

July 29, 2008 5:18 PM

There will be another initiative

there_will_be_blood.jpg
Yesterday the opponents of Initiative 113 came in to meet with the Rocky's editorial board. Since this is the year of Ballotpalooza, voters might already be getting confused about what's what, so here's my handy interpretation of the measure:

Say the oil and gas industry has a big Colorado milkshake -- Rocky road flavor, naturally. And say the Nature Conservancy has a straw. And Gov. Ritter picks up the straw and stretches it acroooooooss the room so that they can all drink from the milkshake. They drink it up!! And they give drops of milkshake to college kids to consume with their daily diet of Taco Bell. And the oil and gas industry, perturbed by the extra $321 million in milkshake money they'll have to cough up per year, passes the milkshake loss onto consumers.

Got it?

Add to Technorati Favorites

July 27, 2008 10:49 PM

Oddest press conference question EVER!

sarkobama.jpg
During The Sarkobama Show last week, CNN's Christiane Amanpour posed this question to the French president (and luckily it's transcribed on the blog of ABC News correspondent Jake Tapper):

"Mr. President Sarkozy, you know that in France, the presence of Barack Obama and what he's done in terms of breaking the barriers in the United States has sort of made a resurgence. The black people in France are very proud and very hopeful for their future. They also live many of them in poor situations and you know you've had your own riots here and protests and disturbances in the [...] city.

At one point, when we were covering those riots, when you were interior ministry, you called the rioters scum. And I am wondering if you feel today when you stand next to someone you so much admire, and who has broken so many barriers that you regret that term or wish you hadn't said it?"


And what does Barack Obama have to do with North African immigrant offspring torching hundreds of cars and killing a guy trying to put out a trash can fire? Nothing!! Apple, meet orange. Orange, meet apple. And cue the response from Sarkozy, who has brought entertainment and smugness where there used to be just utter Chirac smugness:

"I congratulate you, Madame, on your exceptional knowledge of French political life and your contribution to friendship between people. But precisely things change because there were certain things that weren't right and I'm very pleased, Madame, you're speaking in front of Barack about a situation that existed before I was President ...

"I'd like you to appreciate not one single shot was fired by the police in France. The only innocent person was a member of the police. But, since my election, there have been no riots because we have put into place a development plan which is considerable. ... The political adventure of Barack Obama is not just simply reserved for that great country of the United States. ... I don't know if it was to please me, but your question really pleased me. Do come back, thank you."


Add to Technorati Favorites

July 25, 2008 1:40 PM

Campaigning for legalized prostitution?

obamajohns.jpgWe know that the candidates pimp for votes, but these likely aren't the campaign volunteers they want: The Smoking Gun reports that, for the second time in recent weeks, a Chicago man sporting a Barack Obama T-shirt was arrested for allegedly soliciting a sex act from an undercover cop. More:

"Sherman Cleveland, 40, was arrested last week and had his car impounded after he allegedly offered a female police officer money if she'd perform a sex act upon him, according to Officer Laura Kubiak, a Chicago Police Department spokesperson. As seen in the mug shot, Cleveland was wearing a shirt with the words 'Obama For Change' and a caricature of the presumptive Democratic nominee. Previously, a Chicago man with a 'Barack' t-shirt was arrested on a similar solicitation charge."


I'm waiting for the statements from the Mutual Condemnation Society: First, the Obama campaign will state that they in no way support the wardrobe of Obama T-shirts for use by johns and feel personally insulted by the gesture, while the McCain campaign will seconds later issue a statement decrying the use of Obama's image while soliciting sex, stating it is an insult to the character of the candidate and in no way does the campaign support such T-shirt usage.

Add to Technorati Favorites

July 24, 2008 4:36 PM

Most entertaining analysis of Obama's Mideast trip

obamaabbas.jpg
Al Jazeera senior political analyst Marwan Bishara apparently debates himself on the topic of "Is Obama an Israel appeaser?"

I guess every other wonk or pundit was too busy for an interview... or still tagging along on the Barack Foreign Policy Tour '08.



Add to Technorati Favorites

About this blog

Search this blog

Recent posts

Categories

Bridget's favorite blogs

Colorado blogroll

Hyperpartisan blogroll

Bridget's favorite linkage