March 2007 | Main | May 2007

April 30, 2007
Single-payer system would solve all woes

Gladys Foster of Centennial writes:
"The coming clash/Tax hikes for boomers will ignite conflict," the featured April 14 Commentary piece by so eminent a columnist as Robert J. Samuelson requires an answer.
He describes the clash to come to boomers from Social Security and Medicare. In disagreement, I make three points:
First, Social Security and Medicare have different functions and different funding and should be analyzed separately.
Second, Social Security, as currently structured, can be expected to continue to be fully funded for several decades, as argued by the Congressional Budget Office and other authorities, and even then would need only minor adjustments to continue full funding.
Third, the health-care system in the United States is indeed broken but could be expanded to cover everyone at much less cost than now if a universal single-payer plan were adopted. Presidential aspirant Dennis Kucinich has introduced such a plan in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (211) | TrackBack

Animal testing awful

Carol L. Scherbarth of Colorado Springs writes:
I could go on and on about my feelings regarding the testing that is done on animals in the name of science ("CSU vets grow tissue for laboratory tests," April 14). I believe, however, Mark Twain said it most eloquently and efficiently: "I am not interested to know whether vivisection produces results that are profitable to the human race or doesn't. The pain which it inflicts upon unconsenting animals is the basis of my enmity toward it, and it is to me sufficient justification of the enmity without looking further."

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (38) | TrackBack

Insurance costs go still higher

John Ruckman of Lakewood writes:
We have been told for a couple of years now that auto insurance rates would stop their upward spiral if we just changed from no-fault to everybody-on- his-own.
I just paid my insurance for the coming year. It increased 12.1 percent from last year. This is with zero accidents and zero tickets.
Something is amiss here. We are constantly told that the inflation rate is about 3 percent to 4 percent. If this is true, why are so many of my big-item bills increasing at rates two to five times this number (they all blame it on "increased costs") and none are going down?
Somebody is seriously off base on their numbers.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Focus on issues, not fundraising

Marti Reed of Arvada writes:
The current method of election - usually determined by who spends the most - has resulted in too many good candidates losing, not on the issues, but on an inability to compete in fundraising.
We should be voting on the issues, not the number of campaign ads, the "polish" of those ads or the party to which the candidates belong. It should not matter what party the candidate belongs to, or what sex or race the candidate is. The important thing is the issues. And the issues continue to get lost in the rush to collect campaign funds, and spend said funds on the best media "spots," and the best advertising agencies.
I am tired of candidates spending more time trying to raise campaign funds than in telling the voters what they believe, what they will do and what changes they would like to make. If campaign funding were equal, maybe the focus could go back to where it belongs - the issues.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Can they be so sure?

Howard W. Zoufaly of Broomfield writes:
On a recent Thursday evening, various weather reports all agreed we would have a foot or more of snow and that the Friday morning rush hour would be a nightmare. Obviously they were wrong ... again.
These same experts tell us of the certainty of global warming and its effects in 70 or more years. It makes me wonder how they can be so sure about something so far in the future when they can't even get today's forecast correct. Chicken Little was wrong as well.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (36) | TrackBack

Ominous precedent if Bush wins case

Sean Shealy of Littleton writes:
It is more than "somewhat chilling" that the Bush administration is arguing - in a court of law - that "the president's right to control his message includes the right to exclude people expressing discordant viewpoints from the audience." The case arises from a lawsuit filed by three townhall meeting attendees who were kicked out because of an anti-war bumper sticker on their car.
Of course, Bush will lose the case. But what if, by some incompetence or misguided ideological allegiance, he wins?
The crux of the argument is not that the president's free speech was interrupted by protest, but simply that the fear of someone potentially uttering a disagreement was enough to ban them from the publicly funded meeting.
What of future presidential debates? If a precedent is established that says the president's right to "control his message" trumps the rights of others to speak opposing views, what remains of democracy?
In repeatedly challenging our Constitution in courts of law, the disregard this administration shows for both the history and the future welfare of this republic is astounding.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (42) | TrackBack

Bush should brush up on Constitution

David Eichenberger of Littleton writes:I do wish the president would add to his reading list that very document which he twice so solemnly swore to faithfully uphold; for in reading the Constitution, one can't help but be struck by the relatively broad powers of war vested in Congress vs. the singular authority afforded the executive.
In contrast to the European systems of the day, the framers did not want the blood and treasure of our nation committed by the decision of a single individual; thus the constitutional grant of presidential war power, though vital, is considerably more limited and specific in its scope than that granted to Congress.
To complain, as this president does, that Congress is interfering in his prosecution of this woebegone war is a little like a father arguing that his wife is interfering with his raising of their wayward children. He might well believe his is the overriding authority, but in truth, both have at the very least an equal responsibility and stake in the outcome.
Were Congress to not finally stand to its duty and at long last get involved in this misguided war, as it truly has not for these past four years, it would be a gross and even malfeasant abdication of the legislative mandate demanded by, first, our Constitution itself and, more lately, by we, the people, in the November 2006 elections.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (21) | TrackBack

Survey the troops

Denis Gessing of Denver writes:
Survey the troops
Would someone please survey the troops and returning vets. Ask them which undermines the troops more: a Congress and the majority of U.S. citizens seeking an end to this unjust, immoral, unwinnable war or a president and defense department who would extend the troops’ tours of duty and/or have them recalled for a second or third time.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (53) | TrackBack

Equal access, please

Donna Peterson of Denver writes:
I went to the Denver Museum of Nature & Science on April 7 to visit the Benjamin Franklin exhibit. There were many brochures available, but they were all in Spanish. When I requested a brochure on the exhibit in English I was told to just read the exhibits. They do not provide brochures in English.
I am outraged! My tax dollars help sponsor the museum and we all pay the same fee to go to the exhibit.
I do not have a problem sharing the languages, both English and Spanish, but it is just wrong to have Spanish-only brochures. This is, after all, still the United States, where English is the primary language. At least it was the last time I checked. It is just wrong not to at least provide equal access for those who speak English.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (62) | TrackBack

Motives suspect

Douglas Graen of Denver writes:
I am not going to make excuses for the harassment that the members of the Tennessee Center for Policy Research received after reporting how much electricity Al Gore’s home uses (“Gore whistleblowers savaged,” April 7). It is inexcusable.
However, I am sick and tired of extreme conservatives trying to make us feel sorry for them when their motives are less than commendable. What reason can there be to discredit Gore? The only one I can think of is to protect big business at the cost of sacrificing future generations’ health and well-being.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (16) | TrackBack

April 28, 2007
Aurora police

Mark A. Golden of Aurora writes:

Let’s see what sense of logic we can make of this new development between the Aurora Civil Service Commission and the Aurora Chief of Police.
We have a Sergeant who is accused, by a person of black heritage, to have assaulted her. The Sergeant has been found by a Review Board, consisting of not less than 8 people, to have used appropriate force, thus not guilty. Then we have a Chief of Police who has been accused of Attempting to Influence a Public Official (the entire Civil Service Commission) and violating an Employees Right of Due Process and after a review by a Law Firm, hired by the City of Aurora, found to be guilty. Now, we get to the tricky part. The Chief who has been found guilty is trying to have a larger say in promoting or not promoting those who have been found innocent. In short, we are rewarding the guilty and possibly condemning the innocent. Which POT is calling which KETTLE black?
Why are the Black Political Activists trying to promote this form of logic in the first place? When have we begun condoning the condemnation of people who have been exonerated and begun rewarding the people who have been found guilty? What type of Political Hoopla is this? Leave the Police Sergeant alone. He has been exonerated and has competed fairly for a promotion, let him have the promotion and move on people.
Try condemning the Chief and the City Officials who are still accused of illegal acts and have failed to be held accountable for their indiscretions. (Chief Oates, the Assistant City Manager, the Assistant City Attorney, the Fire Chief, the Assistant to the Fire Chief and City Councilwoman Molly Markert) You have a lot more people in the City’s upper echelon committing crimes you should be worried about than this one Sergeant who has already been exonerated.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Road rage sentence

Lisa Arata of Greeley writes:

I have written a letter to Virginia Reynolds and don’t know if it’s your policy to publish letters written directly to individuals, but I thought I’d show it to you anyway:

Dear Virginia Reynolds, Thank you for your letter of 4/23/07, expressing your feelings about how the criminal justice system worked the case against your son, Jason Reynolds.
I’m sorry he got labeled “The Road Rager.” That must have hurt.
I wish he would’ve gotten the change of venue you wanted for him. People somewhere else would probably have understood that your son is really not so bad.
I’m sorry for the hate he suffered, and for the way science and engineering facts were used against him like that.
Juries should be composed of people like you, who understand the basic humanity of road-incident-participants, where others were driving wrong and needed to be taught a lesson.
It takes a big person to have empathy for families who lost their men. They deserve some empathy.
Isn’t it outrageous how people do mean things for their own selfish gratification, this time victimizing your son? I don’t know DA Chambers but if you don’t like her, neither do I. You had a rough time, so did your son. Why is there so much injustice in this world? A good mother stands by her son, no matter what he did. At least you can visit him and send him care packages.
Now I have to go. One of my kids killed a puppy with his teeth and got in trouble for it. I have to go defend him.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (38) | TrackBack

Ethanol

Wilton W. Webb of Golden writes:

Regarding SB 238, wherein the State will require all gasoline sold in Colorado to contain at least ten percent ethanol by Nov 1, ‘07 and two percent ethanol for diesel by Nov 1, 2008. There is a serious flaw in the equation to achieve these goals.
It appears no one has factored in the amount of water that will be required to grow the additional corn or process the corn into ethanol. How can we deplete one natural resource to supplement another, without dire consequences? The State of Colorado, energy companies, and scientists seem to forget that about three years ago major lakes were almost dry and the Ogallala aquifer was being drained at an alarming rate. And now, Colorado municipalities want the courts to rule more favorably for access to the Platte River water supply for the cities, thereby taking away water from the farmers in the Platte River valley, where the corn is grown.
Has anyone taken the time and effort to factor in the water requirement for ethanol, especially in the Mid-west? Probably not, and here we go down the path of destruction or depletion of another natural resource because our scientists and politicians can’t seem to see the big picture or get the equation right. We’ll be driving around with ten percent ethanol filled tanks while we look for water, pay higher prices at the grocery store, and higher prices for gasoline enriched with ethanol. Sounds great we’re just grand when it comes to protecting the environment by leaving out key factors for an equation to solve a problem!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Virginia Tech & Columbine documents

Caryn Boddie of Littleton writes:

I disagree with Rohrbaugh, Brown and Petrone. I applaud Sheriff Mink for his stand.
The assertion of this group of people that releasing the Columbine tapes and documents to the public would have prevented the Virginia shootings has no basis in fact. Apparently, the murderer in Virginia fueled his own hatred, by what had already been released to the public about the murderers in Littleton. The Columbine tapes, had they been released, would only have added fuel to his fire.
People already knew the murderer in Virginia was seriously troubled. They were trying to get him to accept help. I am not in a position to say what more they could or should have done.
The release of such tapes over the airwaves, which belong to the public, is harmful to that public because they glorify the murderer. This further harms the psyches of the victims’ families and the young people that have been wounded and traumatized. I daresay that if the Columbine tapes had been released without the consent of the ‘Columbine dads’ right after the shooting at Columbine High School, they would not be making this argument, but another one.
I believe it was obscene for NBC to release that tape in Virginia. It would be just as obscene to release the Columbine tapes, even now. Good for Sheriff Mink for standing on principle.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Mike Littwin

James L. Sullivan of Thornton writes:

Typical Littwin; I suppose his aging-hippie photo should give us a major “clue". The line on the Front Page says, “ Experts ———- didn’t do enough". As with most Liberal “rants", he never defines what “enough” is. Hey! It worked with Viet Nam! Why change a workable strategy. The article actually says (for those dozen or so of you who read it), that no one (the “professionals” he quotes) seem to know; what is “enough". Yet, Littwin, with his Liberal’s wisdom, proclaims that “someone” didn’t do enough.
Amazing that the “News” gives this guy so much space to spread his venom.
Thanks for your time.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (30) | TrackBack

Union Station plan

Robert Brewster of Golden writes:

Convenient Transit vs. Development Re: March 24 “Financial pinch...FasTracks” and April 9 “Commuters take back seat...”

You know something is amiss if the state’s leading rail and transit advocacy group (ColoRail) takes serious issue with the unfolding plan for Denver Union Station (DUS). That plan calls for the eviction from the site and/or very costly burial of the 3 connecting transit modes comprising the DUS transit hub, advertised as “convenient” in RTD’s successful FasTrack’s campaign.
This plan is anthing but convenient, nor is it a wise expenditure of funds, no matter what the source.
The driving forces at play are the city’s desire to saturate the site with tax-generating development, which will hide much of the historic station from view, and the city’s irrational obsession with extending 18th Street through the property. Is there a shortage of single-occupant, space- consuming, polluting, pedestrian-stalking vehicles downtown? We need the development to pay for burying the tracks, which we must do to accommodate the development. Get it?
While it is understandable, and desirable, to capitalize on the DUS transit hub, we must not lose sight of its (voter-approved tax increase) purpose: to offer a convenient and affordable alternative to our increasingly expensive and problematic “travel-by-auto” conumdrum. Ironically, we have far better transit connectivity at DUS right now than we will EVER have under the current proposal. Our city and region will not be served well with this plan, especially as we view into the future.
And with RTD’s well-publicized uncertainty about FasTracks finances, why is the most expensive transit infrastructure (burial) still on the table?
There are better ways for all parties to achieve their goals at DUS. All visionaries and critical thinkers who care about our transportation future should attend the Union Station Advisory Committee (USAC) meeting at RTD’s Administration Building, 1600 Blake Street, on Thursday, April 19, at 5:30pm.
We only have one shot at getting this right. Let’s not squander it!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Iraq war & Harry Reid

Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

Most Americans are incensed by the recent remarks of Sen. Harry Reid that “this war is lost, and this surge is not accomplishing anything.” What a message this sends to our troops on the battlefront! Yet, we hear no outcry from the press. If Sen.
Reid and the Democrats were serious about supporting the troops, they would also be supporting their mission. As it is, they support neither. The facts speak for themselves.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (103) | TrackBack

Iraq war & Democrats

Colin C. Case of Highlands Ranch writes:

Yes, the democrats have a plan—-give up. They simply want to pretend that we don’t have a moral and perhaps legal responsibility to the Iraqi people.
With the approval of over 70% of the American people and with approval of an overwhelming majority of congress, we the American people through its military removed the Iraqi government and military. As a consequence we owe Iraq a stable government and a viable military before we leave. I have stated in a previous letter that we should not be subjecting our troops to the civil war that is underway. We should pull our troops back to protect Iraq’s borders and let the Iraqis have the blood bath that they apparently want. Once they are tired of that and want a stable government, we can have our military step in and help where appropriate. If the Iraqi government that emerges after the blood bath does not want our help then, and only then, we can bring our troops home. If we do anything less we will shame ourselves and put future generations in sever danger as the world and the terrorist look on us with contempt, knowing that if they make any future battle bloody enough, we will give up.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (27) | TrackBack

Victimization

R.L. Stamp of Littleton writes:

Victimizing – Columbine and Virginia Tech: You are not a victim if you were born in America. You are not a victim if you were lucky enough to move to America from some other part of the World. You are lucky and there are millions of people throughout the World who would like to be in your shoes.
Maybe the messages of “victimization” are too prominent in our day to day lives. Victimization is used to get votes for political gains; it is used as basis of major news stories; and it is used to explain away the fact that some people are lazy or have not received the tools of success from our educational system. Could it be that some of these tragedies would not have happened if the pundits, politicians and the media were not preaching “victim”? From the information that is out these guys were really not victims, somebody told them they were. How else would they have gotten these crazy ideas? Why aren’t we proud of our success in this country?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Danny Dietz memorial

Raphael Egger of Glendale writes:

Much has been written eulogizing the Navy Seal Hero Danny Dietz and demonizing those who opposed the public display of a statue in his honor. It is right that Danny should be honored for having the courage to do what he believed to be right and that his parents and wife should be given recognition and sympathy. It is also most fitting that those opposing the location and message sent to the youth viewing this war monument should be recognized and honored for their courage and enlightenment in speaking up in a society that has been brainwashed by the war hawks. Those who belittle people such as Linda Cuesta and Emily Cassidy Fuchs are only revealing the smallness of their own character.
Violence begets violence. And that is true whether the violence in committed by “terrorists” or “war heroes". The law of the Universe is that we get what we concentrate on — and the statue of Danny certainly does not instill love and peace.
Fortunately, the tide is turning away from war and toward peace. While most of this revealed by the media is surface and centered on self interest, the real change runs deep. The movement toward love and peace is on an unstoppable trajectory which will render the war boys powerless.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Alternative minimum tax

Frank Slavick of Superior writes:

The elitists of the Republican party secretly love a tax — the alternative minimum tax, or AMT. Originally intended to make the wealthiest pay something in taxes, next year the AMT will collide with America’s middle class if Congress does not act to stop it. The White House will not support Congress, and will not propagandize against this unjust tax because it means $50 billion a year to help fund Bush’s treasury-draining Iraq war. Since this does not yet impact Bush’s self-acknowledged base of support ("some people call you the elite, I call you my base"), why would there be outrage from this president?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Gun control

K.A. Skala of Denver writes:

Greg Dobbs says: “. . . gun rights advocates can’t point to a single country with strict gun control . . . where there’s a higher rate of gun deaths than . . .in the United States” ("Reasonable restrictions . . .", 4/21). That is a false argument, apples and oranges. Some countries with stiff laws have fewer deaths because of their history, mentality and attitude to authority.
Example: Japan. Better comparison is two similar regions in the same country.
States and cities in the U.S. with stiff laws do have higher rates than places with “shall issue” laws and armed population. Washington, D.C. is a crime capital of the US, with Chicago not far behind. Schools with total bans on guns do have a higher rate of gun deaths than the surrounding country. Also, countries with easy access to guns have less violent crime. Examples: Switzerland, and for violence outside the conflict with the Palestinians, Israel. Equally convincing: when a region relaxes the laws, crime goes down; when it stiffens them, crime goes up (numerous examples). Finally, Dobbs is getting his proof: Great Britain and Australia recently virtually disarmed the population.
Crime shot up. The rate of death is well on the way to exceed the US, if it hasn’t already. Q.E.D.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Justice?

Brendan Harrington of Denver writes:

In comparing two items from the local section of the Rocky Mountain News today, I have one simple question that, hopefully, will make people wonder.
Mere rhetoric, I suppose, as there can not possibly be an acceptable, logical answer to this query.
There are two stories today regarding charges of Child AbuseResulting in Death. Why is it that they carry such dramatically different sentences? A Fort Carson soldier and Iraq War veteran, Johnathon Klinker, is facing these charges for dropping his infant daughter four inches while playing with her in their home. Her head hit too hard and she died of a hemmorage. This soldier accepts full responsibility for his actions, shows great remorse and faces 30 to 64 years in prison.
Meanwhile, Gil Smith, the moron who some time ago killed his 2-year old son by dragging him (while drunk) at 30 mph on an inner tube behind his boat with no supervision, gleefully waved to rescue workers as they searched for his lost son’s body while boating by, shows no remorse whatsoever and now has been arrested again for drunk driving, assaulting a deputy and causing a car accident ... served 60 DAYS in prison for the same charge of Child Abuse Resulting in Death.
Why the dispcrepancy in these sentences for a similar crime? It just goes to show that justice truly is blind.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Hope Online

Barbara Shufford of Centennial writes:

State Senator Windels’ audacity to bring fiscal-oversight in the Hope Online Learning Academy, has resulted in her being subjected to a major bipartisan political Bible-thumping. The right-wing has its faith-based initiatives which are pumping huge sums of taxpayer cash into their preferred religious institutions, from projects like Fitzsimons redevelopment and mega-churches that have disabled military veterans social outreach ministries (VA and social security). The left-wing has its faith based initiative programs like Hope, with religious leaders who also fleece their flocks. All are taxpayer cash-cows for evangelical goons, and they fly in the face of separation of church from state. Where’s Pelosi and Reid when you need’em?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Iraq war & Democrats

Kerry Harwick of Arvada writes:

As a combat infantry veteran of the Viet Nam War, I am very disappointed and displeased with our Democratic House and Senate members. They are emboldening our enemies in Iraq with their inane legislation for funding our troops with a specified timeline for withdrawal of them. This defeatist message not only encourages the resolve of the enemy fighting our troops, but also aids them in setting a long term strategy for an eventual takeover of the Country. This is a disgrace and blatant slap in the face to our men and women serving and fighting there.
If the Democrats succeed in there defeatist strategy and it leads to the Muslim extremist takeover of Iraq, the resources there will eventually find there way here and will be manifest in American deaths and destruction. They evidently have forgotten the tragic images of NYC, what happened on 911 and how potent and real the threat of radical Islam is.
President Bush, has changed the command and strategy in Iraq, and with this should be given the time and resources to rectify the situation there. If he and our troops aren’t we will not only be looking at another debacle similar in nature to the one caused by our untimely withdrawal from Viet Nam, but as the Vietnamese confined their later butchery to Southeast Asia, the U.S. will this time have it brought here and be the recipient of it on our home soil.
This is not the time or place for the Colorado Democrat Representative and (or) the rest of them to be playing political games at the expense of our national security. Unfortunately it appears the could care less.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Virginia Tech massacre

S. Mercer of Denver writes:

I am so tired of people, including President Bush, referring to victims of school shootings as “being in the wrong place at the wrong time.” It’s like they are being blamed for getting murdered.
These victims had every right to be exactly where they were; in school getting an education! Where else should they have been? The only people were in the wrong place at the wrong place were the killers themselves.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Nacchio trial

David Nilges of Centennial writes:

I sat through five days of the Nacchio trial expecting to see “Legal Brilliance". What I saw was a tired man, Stern, trying mightily to kill the goliath, that is, the U. S. Government. Stricklin was no Perry Mason of TV fame, but he was adroit, adept, technically oriented, and well prepared to blunt a few weak “Thrusts” by Stern, he of the “How to win a trial” video tape fame, and ultimately “Slay the dragon.”
The “Dragon” was good old “Joe” he of the $547 M net worth, he of the “haircut", he of the “White Horse", he of the “I will win, no matter what...” attitude.
Whoa folks, the jury won, Joe lost, the Government won, not during the case, but by setting up a last minute victory, how?
* Conroy was organized, used graphics folks could understand, and importantly, short, to the point, and when she was finished “Joe” was chopped liver.
* Stern, looked old, talked old, violated every public speaking rule by even going so far as to apologize for “Boring” folks, apologizing for being “Repetitious", and worse, not understanding that when your audience is bored, shut up, sit down.
* Stricklin made the “Set up” early in the trial, how: One day I came in after lunch and rode up in the elevator with a “Mom” and two “Tousled Hair Kids", guess who, Stricklin’s boys and wife; Stricklin made sure the wife and kids sat immediately behind him when he resumed questioning a witness for the government and made sure the Jurors saw him run his hands through the hair of the boys.
* In his close, when Stricklin made the “I would never, ever speech", I am almost certain the jurors tied his words to the earlier scene of his “Family, his wife, his boys".
* At that point the air went out of the room, Stern, Nacchio, the jurors, and all in attendance.
Game, set, match, It was 100% over.
Lawyers, “Ya gotta love em", right? Did the government win the case, nope, they sold the case; is “Joe guilty", the jury said so, most believe so, but if I could give “Joe” a few wrods of advice on his appeal, “Get a new attorney Joe".
Stern may have wanted to be Colombo, but today techies win, old timers, well they sure don’t win, and perhaps, as Doug MacArthur said years ago, “old soldiers ... whatever ... fade away.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Zoo sensationalism

Doug McPeek of Denver writes:

The front page article "Risky Business" written by Todd Hartman on the 12th of April is pure sensationalism. I have two main issues with his article: 1. Mr. Hartman did not provide any comparison with other, similar zoos. 2. Using the data in the article, there has been one accident per every 648,000 contact hours. To say the least, the death of Ashlee Pfaff was tragic. By comparison, there were 1,075 alcohol related deaths from 2002 through 2005. Granted this is not a fair comparison, but Mr.
Hartman provided no comparison at all.
Mr. Hartman, I’m not sure what your intention was, but I found it to be nothing more than negative filler for the front page.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Post flubs coverage of civil rights initiative

John S. Rosenberg of Crozet, Va., writes:
As someone whose counsel was sought by the drafters of the Colorado Civil Rights Initiative, I read <i>The Denver Post news story about its launch, “Race, sex emphasis in Colo. targeted,” with both amusement and concern.
Amusement, at Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education Executive Director David Longanecker’s hilarious and totally off-the-wall assertion that a measure barring discrimination against or preferential treatment of any individual or group “on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin” would somehow bar preferential treatment of athletes.
If the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education offers courses in remedial reading to its staff, Longanecker should enroll immediately.
Concern, because the Post’s reporter either misunderstood or misquoted (or both) CCRI Executive Director Valery Pech Orr’s response to Longanecker’s misreading.
Orr knows that CCRI would have no effect whatsoever on favorable treatment of athletes (or oboe players, for that matter) since it bars only discrimination based on race, sex, ethnicity or national origin.
Since informed debate is undermined by the sort of misinformation contained in this article, I hope the Post’s coverage of this important issue improves.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Many no doubt wrestled with decision

Steffan Tubbs of Denver, 850-AM (KOA), writes:
In his critique of the media’s handling of the Virginia Tech killer’s manifesto, “Airing, publishing killer’s photos, rants reckless” (On the Media, April 21), Rocky Mountain News media critic Dave Kopel missed relaying something to the Rocky’s audience.
I think he made some good points, and many of them I couldn’t agree with more. However, Kopel blew it in regard to even hinting at the fact that there was great debate in likely every newsroom in the country as to how to handle the killer’s manifesto.
Thursday morning, after I returned from covering the killings from the scene for two days, our debate in the KOA newsroom began around 4:30 a.m. and continued throughout the show.
Certainly not everyone agreed to play those tapes, reveal the audio and show still photos. Others felt it was not the media’s role to play censor, to play the “parental” role.
Yet, in his column, Kopel painted the media as a one-minded monster.
This only adds fuel to the “we-hate- the-media-and-here’s-why” fire.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Will it take 60 deaths next time?

Dave Petteys of Roxborough Park writes:
It is a fact that in sports TV coverage, cameras will <i>noti> cover a streaker should one jump out and dash across a basketball court or baseball field. Why? To discourage others from following suit!
Should not this common-sense precept be applied to Virginia Tech-like situations as well?
The message the media is sending is this: If you want your views broadcast nationwide, all you have to do is make a videotaped last will and testament and create mayhem!
The killer did follow the publicized Hamas example to a T.
If the Columbine count was around 15 and the Virginia Tech count was around 30, does this mean that the next number in the series needs to be 60 in order to get on TV news?
Freedom of speech does have a dimension of responsibility, something the media has apparently cast aside.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Unneeded news from Iowa

Victor True of Parker writes:
The Rocky Mountain News says it is going to set up a new bureau in Iowa to give us daily updates on the road to the White House.
The Rocky can save its money and efforts.
It doesn’t matter how the politicians are doing in the polls; it is not important how much money they have raised; and we collectively do not need this information until 2008, preferably mid-2008.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Room enough for both

Sally Cumine of Denver writes:
The newspapers are all about people — their stories, events, disasters, wars etc. Once in a while there is something about animals in the paper. It may be just a blurb or a big story such as the pet-food recall.
But, there is <i>alwaysi> someone who writes in — or a columnist like Jason Salzman (On the Media, April 14) — who complains, “But, what about people? Why aren’t we talking about people’s plights?” Geez! Can’t we do both?

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

April 27, 2007
Gun control

Brian T. Schwartz, Ph.D., of Boulder writes:

Is it fair to report that CU student Matthew Furnish’s “crime” was possession of “deadly weapons” — especially in the caption under his photograph? (News, April 20) Might have “firearms,” used later in the article, been more neutral? How would the News report the life-saving acts of Kenneth Hammond of Ogden, Utah, or assistant principal Joel Myrick of Pearl, Mississippi? Each used a firearm — in a “gun-free zone” — to stop criminals who had opened fire in mall and a school, respectively.
Would the News refer to guns as “implements of life-saving self-defense"?
Adults with permits can legally carry concealed firearms in Utah schools and universities, where there have been no mass-killings. In Utah, those sufficiently trained to have conceal-carry permits can deter and heroically stop violent criminals. At CU, they are felons. CU’s prohibition of firearms for self-defense purposes leaves students, staff, and faculty defenseless against deranged school-shooters.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:25 PM | Comments (55) | TrackBack

Junk advertising

Darin Garrett of Highlands Ranch writes:

The “Do Not Call” list was an astounding success. I hope we the people can vote on a “No Junk Mail” list. What would be better than that? May I suggest a “No Junk on my Door” list. Who among us are tired of removing layers of tape from the doorknob? Chasing wind blown “Do not Disturb"sized ads for someone to put a bunch of holes in our yards? Love the tactic of the cute little “flags” at the end of the driveway. You know the ones normally reserved for Don’t Dig Here, Pesticides,etc. We have a No Solicitor sign on our front door. Not working so good. What part of “Solicit” do people who distribute this waste not understand? We have a sufficient list of services we use when needed. We would never use anyone because they taped something to our door. You are unwanted and are trespassing!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:24 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Iraq war

i>Cord MacGuire of Boulder writes:

Recent press reports reveal that the Pentagon has essentially despaired of ever standing-up a reliable Iraqi army by year’s end, as Bush had proclaimed, and that U.S. occupying troops would therefore not be standing-down anytime soon.
Despite four years of presumably intensive training, the new Iraqi army is still seen to be riddled with rebel infiltrators. We know that Iraqi soldiers often flee when faced with hostile forces. The unity and initiative within their ranks are undermined by sectarian and political tensions.
Soldiers’ loyalty to their own government appears tentative at best.
Since the so-called surge has been in effect, U.S. casualty rates have doubled in Baghdad. It’s now evident that U.S. forces will somehow have to quell the insurgency absent any prospect of significant Iraqi help. Furthermore, the ostensible government of prime minister al-Maliki has proven itself to be unwilling or unable to pass a new Iraq oil law, without which U.S. interests will have been entirely defeated.
Until the Democratic majority in Congress is able to muster enough votes to cut-off funding, the terrible price paid by U.S. troops in Iraq’s cynical maelstrom will continue to escalate.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:00 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Bush’s anti-terror hypocrisy

Mark D. Benner of Anton writes:

Soon after the dust cleared from 9/11 George W. Bush reemerged with a few pronouncements. One was that if you support terrorists or if you harbor terrorists we will regard you as supporting terrorists and get you. The USA Patriot Act even makes harboring terrorists a crime.
Friday April 20, a New Mexico court released wanted terrorist Luis Posada Carriles, the mastermind of the 1976 jet liner bombing that killed all 73 passengers on board. Posada Carriles was then in the employ of the CIA He was one of “our terrorists”.
He was captured and imprisoned in Venezuela, escaped, and found his way to Miami with “help” and was caught sneaking into the U.S. and arrested and held on immigration charges. He has been in a New Mexico jail since, despite efforts on behalf of Venezuela and Cuba to extradite him to stand trial for his crimes. Bush has refused to comply, and Friday Carriles was released on bail.
President Bush is effectively harboring a terrorist. He has violated his own word and laws. Again.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:59 PM | Comments (30) | TrackBack

Greenhouse gases

R. Kiefer of Arvada writes:

Come on, Governor, get with it! New Mexico,Arizona, California, Oregon and Washington are all cooperating in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Where is Colorado in all this? Are we less concerned with saving our health and the health of our planet than are other states, or does letting influential industries make a lot of money ( at the expense of our health ) trump this idea?
Citizens of Colorado who are concerned should be pressuring ( Yes, thats right, pressuring - as in oil, auto, and Big Biz lobbying! ) Governor Ritter and our legislators to do the right thing for our environment. We cannot shame George W. Bushs administration to do whats right in this sphere, for it has no shame ( or concern for the ordinary citizen, ) so we must admonish our state to do it.
If this attitude offends some because it might lead to a lessening of their profits, the health of everyone - at least where the government is concerned - should trump their pocketbooks any day. The majority of Americas citizens, as well as the environment, deserve at least a fair shake from our government - and for our tax monies.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:59 PM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Abortion

Frank Galmish of Denver writes:

The laws in Colorado, America and the world are strange. Even stranger are those that make and interpret the law. And we know that there have been glaring mistakes by even the supreme court. At one time with the Dread Scott case, a human being was determined to be just property and slave holders loved the decision but it angered many others. Of course it was wrong. And in this century abortion was deemed ok. A baby growing in a woman’s womb was long protected in our country. I won’t term these woman mothers because the term really doesn’t fit. Then the great supreme court said that if a woman viewed the growing baby as a burden you could kill it but if you deemed it a great gift from the Almighty, why you could let it grow and keep it.
Now after decades (approximately 48 million deaths by abortion in the US, again the great supreme court says that one way of killing innocent babies is barbaric and won’t allow this to be done anymore. Yet it allowed it for years. And in the last few years our legislative body here in our great state has tried to pass legislation to change the stature of limitations on child sexual abuse to mainly target the Catholic Archdiocese to get two deceased priests that they claim had abused children sexually decades ago. It was poor law and didn’t fly. But no problem as we now have a judge, Judge Robert Hyatt, who just allows the statures to be changed against the Archdiocese. After all it is only Catholics and we can change the statures of limitations on them.
If you can’t get what you want by the front door, why our courts are good at going through the back door-especially if it is people we really don’t care about. It makes one wonder if old Charlie Dicken’s Mr. Bumble was right when he said: “Sir, if the law says that, then the law is a ass!” And anyway who really trusts lawyers who through their glib tongues can twist things around to have juries believe just about anything. Too bad we don’t have the like of old Charlie here today. He would never run out of material with the law and the people that are involved with it.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:58 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Smoky Hill High & parents

Greg Ross of Centennial writes:

I have a senior and a sophomore attending Smoky Hill High School and often wonder why there are so many “mandatory” parent meetings. It seems not to matter whether the meeting is for tennis team, swim team or graduation — parental attendance is classified as mandatory. (I also find it interesting that parent teacher nights are not described as mandatory). What ever happened to “please” or, “We believe this is very important and your attendance will be appreciated"? I recognize that educators have good reason to think that their’s is a thankless profession, however, most high school parents appreciate their children’s educators and do wish to attend parent meetings, but often have competing challenges, including other children, traffic, jobs, travel and health.
Thus far, I have ignored the school’s rude demands in the assumption that they reflect a more effective means of maximizing parental attendance.
However, after reading about Principal Brown’s decision to bar late-arriving parents, I now believe there may be a disturbing attitude problem at Smoky Hill. With a graduating class of more than 600, Principal Brown must have recognized that a number of parents would be late despite best intentions.
I do not know whether her tyrannical approach to parental relations stems from frustration, ego, or otherwise, but it needs to stop.
While I do not condone Ms. Walsh’s behavior, particularly her feeble attempt to use influence and exercise power, the school was also in the wrong here and I empathize with her frustration. I do not look forward to being bullied into attending future parent meetings, nor will I deserve to be treated like cattle when circumstances work against punctual attendance.
The Cherry Creek School District puts great emphasis at the elementary and middle school levels on anti-bullying. The district may need to develop such a program for the Smoky Hill administration.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:57 PM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Cheney impeachment

Grant D. Cyrus of Boulder writes:

God bless the gutsy congressman Dennis Kucinich for at least filing the initial papers for the impeachment of Vice-president Dick Cheney. Of course this is going to go absolutely nowhere as Democrats, save Senator Russ Feingold, WILL NOT, feel they CAN NOT support him and his too radical ideas right now. Oh well.
At least the man will go down in history as having had the guts to register his rage at this deadly, deadly farce and the great injustices (many) he and Bush have bullied the American public and the world into for the last 5 plus years. I can’t stand bullies either.
Bravo my man, bravo.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:57 PM | Comments (25) | TrackBack

Electoral College & Democrats

Jeff Kocsis of Littleton writes:

Re: Democrats vs. the electoral college

Because Al Gore lost a close election in 2000, Democrats keep clamoring for us to abandon the electoral college in favor of simply adopting the popular vote as the means of determining the winners of our presidential elections. Here’s a hypothetical scenario I’m sure they would have enjoyed: In the 2004 election, had John Kerry taken 70,000 Ohio votes from George Bush, there would have been no question about Kerry’s winning Ohio and the election. Kerry wins 272 electoral votes to Bush’s 266, a clear victory, but Bush would have won the election with a popular vote count of 62 million to 59 million, also a clear victory, and one that would have satisfied the Democrats who keep clamoring for abandonment of the electoral college. Be careful what you wish for!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:56 PM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Climate change

Ed Dean of Windsor writes:

If the global warming “doomies” aren’t any better than the Denver area forecasters, then I don’t think we have a damn thing to worry about.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:56 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Animal fighting

Martin Martin Montorfano of The Humane Society of the United States writes:

The Humane Society of the United States wishes to thank and congratulate U.S. Senator Wayne Allard for his efforts to stop dog fighting and cockfighting. Thanks in part to Senator Allard, who has been working for stronger laws against animal fighting in Congress since 1999, the Animal Fighting Prohibition Enforcement Act passed the U.S. Senate unanimously. The U.S. House of Representatives had previously cleared its version by a landslide vote of 368-39, and it is now on the President’s desk.
This anti-crime legislation will provide felony-level penalties for interstate and foreign animal fighting activities, and outlaw commerce in cockfighting weapons. Animal fighting not only fosters unspeakable cruelty to animals, but also spawns other criminal activity, such as narcotics traffic, illegal gambling, public corruption, and violence toward people.
When animal fighters can earn tens of thousands of dollars wagering on a single fight, a slap on the wrist is considered just a cost of doing business.
Stronger penalties are needed to stop this organized network of criminal activity, and that’s why the National Sheriffs’ Association and 400 law enforcement agencies from across the country joined The Humane Society of the United States in backing this bill.
Thanks to Senator Allard for working to give animal fighting the knock-out punch.
Sincerely, Michael Markarian, Executive Vice President The Humane Society of the United States The Humane Society of the United States 2100 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 (202) 452-1100 Interested in taking action online to help animals? Then join our online community and sign up for our Humane Action Network. Go to www.hsus.org/join.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:55 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Virginia Tech massacre

Steve Wright of Littleton writes:

As I read newspapers and watch the talking heads on TV I am amazed at how people can so blatantly use the deaths of innocent college students to further their agenda. On the day of the shooting the president of the Brady Campaign released a statement stating that the VT murders reinforced why we need “sensible” gun laws. The sensible gun laws the Brady’s currently are pushing are “one gun a month” (VA already has), registration, .50 caliber gun bans, military style weapons bans ... etc. NONE of which would have had any effect on the VT killer, the PA Amish killer, or the Bailey CO killer.
We need REAL dialogue on how to protect Americans, not just the Brady’s fighting for every anti-gun/anti self defense law possible and the NRA opposing them. As long as there are ANY guns available in this country, be they single shot rifles or large capacity military style rifles, right or wrong we are accepting a risk.
Because our hunting and culture will not be totally banning guns anytime soon, there is only ONE possible defense; we must make sure citizens have the means to defend themselves against monsters.
Teachers deputised, trained, and armed with guns? As the father of two little girls it’s offensive to me. But less offensive than seeing some monster strolling around a school and murderering children unhindered by anyone capable of defending them (of course, SWAT shows up five minutes later, when it’s over) and then the political groups start their debate again. Because that WILL happen again at some point, be it with the semi auto guns used by this killer or a single shot hunting rifle.
Too many are dying not to put all the options on the table. We DO need sensible gun laws. But barring the possibility of a gun ban, we need to defend against the tiny percentage of truly insane among us. For the childrens sake, we have to consider every possilbity; not just what is politically expedient for one group or another.
Why don’t we? I guess some people just hate guns more than they love children.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:54 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Danny Dietz memorial

Gwen Domenico of Littleton writes:

Using the statue of Danny Dietz as a teaching tool for our children (as suggested by one letter writer April 13) will be a harsh reality and challenge for many parents. War, suffering, loss, hate, bigotry are realities and hard lessons to teach children to overcome. Do we want to point fingers and lay blame, seek revenge? Or will we teach them how to be less violent, show compassion and honor all humanity? Will we teach them to bully those who disagree with our views, challenge their intellect, integrity and significance? (As Mike Rosen and letter writers did in April 13 editorial page.) Only time will tell what lessons we are teaching the next generation and what they will learn from them. For many, Danny’s statue will represent freedom, heroism, and sacrifice. For those of us wanting to take weapons out of the minds and hands of our children and grandchildren, the assault weapon and war combat pack creates a real teaching challenge and casts a huge shadow over Danny’s statue and the Littleton Community.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:54 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

The U.S. & the U.N.

James J. Amato of Woodland Park, president of the Pikes Peak Chapter of the United Nations Association of the USA, writes:

Monday, April 23rd, marked the first day on the job for the new US Ambassador to the United Nations, Zalmay Khalilzad. Let us hope that this event marks the end of the recent US trend towards a foreign policy of unilateralism. At his testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Ambassador Khalilzad stated “We can enhance the legitimacy of our actions in the eyes of others by enlisting friends and allies to work with us.”
I believe that the new ambassadorship of Mr. Khalilzad, together with the recent accession of Ban Ki-moon to the position of Secretary-General of the United Nations, represents a wonderful opportunity to wipe the slate clean and begin to repair the unfortunate rift in the US-UN relationship. It is true that the UN needs the US, for without the cooperation of its most powerful member state, the UN efforts to resolve conflicts can be severely crippled. But it is equally true that the US needs the UN. In regions of conflict like Iran, Darfur, or North Korea, the cooperation of the UN frees up US resources and confers an irreplaceable mantle of legitimacy on our concerted efforts.
Recent polls have shown that regard for the United States across the globe has sunk to new lows. This is largely because of the unfortunate perception that the US has acted unilaterally and without “a decent respect to the opinions of mankind,” in the words of Thomas Jefferson.
This perception is likely to have catastrophic consequences for the huge collective challenges we face, such as the threat of global warming, nuclear proliferation, and above all the struggle against terrorism. Nothing could be of greater benefit to the United States in the long run than repairing the rift in the US-UN relationship.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:53 PM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Virginia Tech & Rush Limbaugh

Tommy Holeman of Boulder writes:

The head spokesman for the right, Rush something-or -other said that “It hadda be a Liberal” who shot up Virginia Tech, Using his logic, since Timothy McVeigh was a disgruntled ex-soldier as well as an NRA member who traveled the country selling at gun shows for a living, and listening to this Rush guy, he would fit the description of a conservative.
Also since , at the time Rush was railing against the government “a la Clinton” Rush should be held at least vicariously responsible for the carnage at Oklahoma City.
Ergo, the headlines should have read “162 DEAD, IT HADDA BE A CONSERVATIVE.”

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:52 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Commerce City

Heather Mil