Immigration bill
This letter has not been edited.
There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools.
No special ballots for elections.
All government business will be conducted in our language.
Foreigners will NOT have the right to vote no matter how long they are here.
Foreigners will NEVER be able to hold political office.
Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers.
No welfare, no food stamps, no health care, or other government assistance programs.
Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.
If foreigners do come and want to buy land that will be okay.
BUT options will be restricted.
You are not allowed waterfront property. That is reserved for citizens naturally born into this country.
Foreigners may not protest; no demonstrations, no waving a foreign flag, no political organizing, no bad-mouthing our president or his policies.
If you do you will be sent home.
If you do come to this country illegally, you will be hunted down and sent straight to jail.
Harsh, you say? The above laws happen to be the immigration laws of " MEXICO " Posted by DoGooderDan
Prez. Reagan solved the immigration problem with amnesty; amnesty became the incentive for more to come; they come; they bring with them MDRTB (Peter Boyles this morning):
Medical Drug Resistant TB is rampant in Calif. brought by illegal immigrants mostly from Mexico and the Philippines. The 1984 Federal Law mandates no hospital shall turn away anyone within its borders.
It costs between $200,000 and 2$million to treat one afflicted with tuberculosis of the resistant strain. It is not the homeless, the incarcerated or those on drugs who are afflicted; it is the illegal immigrants who, as opposed to legal immigrants that must submit to a TB test and other medical, that are afflicted. Amnesty is extended to the illegal immigrant without the medical testing required of legal immigrants.
Bush, because of the rat in his pocket, says: "It is hard work; we can do it," and his audience of die-hards applaud even though they don't claim to be part of Bush's "we."
"Bring 'em on," says Bush, to the illegal immigrants and the trucks convey soon to invade America from Mexico called a "rolling torpedo" by a democrat.
"The worst of the worst:" That is Bush 2.
Huh, Brian, now George W. Bush and John McCain are liberal Democrats? You might want to let them know that.
Posted by Paulie on May 31, 2007 02:38 PMMr. Stuckey sounds like an infomercial, making unsupported claims for what the proposal is, what it does to people, and what people think about it. In the end he tells us the facts speak for themselves, although he hasn't offered any facts, or any reference to any. I don't think I'll buy this sales pitch any time soon. Besides talk radio has the market cornered on this type of product (resentment/fear/hatred of some "other") already, doesn't it?
Posted by anderson on May 31, 2007 02:43 PMSince you think talk radio is such a powerful tool to reach and brainwash so many people, I think you should apply for a job, Anderson,at least the people listening to you MIGHT support your opinions.
Posted by -J- on May 31, 2007 03:39 PMJ, I couldn't tolerate selling myself out, and lying to people--which is what those jobs entail. Talk radio is successful because they specifically market a low brow message, and they're focus is pretty singular.
Posted by anderson on May 31, 2007 03:51 PMThat SO describes.... ummmm....YOU.
A low brow and singular message. And you're not selling yourself (and YOUR America) to this unfair amnesty plan, and the unlawful populating of YOUR America???? Let me know when you wake up, Sleeping Beauty.
anderson
What do you think about the 82% of the people in the N.Y. Times poll that said they're in favor of tighening border security?
One legitimate question I've had to ask five times now.
Ricky Lee,
I have asked that question to Anderson a few times myself, It seems to stop his agrument dead in it"s tracks. You will notice he will move on to another blog, when the question is proposed to him. Keep up the good work!
Posted by jgd777j on May 31, 2007 05:34 PMOh goodie, my favorite clueless letter writer is back!
Poor Brian, so deluded that he doesn't even know that his Lord and Savior, GWB is the one pushing this legislation. In fact, he said the other day that you're anti-American if you don't support it.
Here's a clue for you Brian--this is about big business and their interest (the bottom line). Cheap labor=more profit. Who controls big business? Why, it would be mostly Republicans. See how that works?
But, you just keep blaming it on the Democrats. You're about as right about that as you were about the Iraq funding bill not getting passed and signed.
Posted by Me on May 31, 2007 06:18 PMMe,
You may want to check the voting records of congress before you start making some of your statements. The Republican are the ones that are stopping this amnesty from passing. The Democrats like Kennedy Pelois and others basically want open borders. They know the illegals will vote 4-1 for the Dems. See how that works?
The only reason the Dems don't like the new bill is because it doesn't allow enough immigrates to enter.
Posted by jgd777 on May 31, 2007 07:06 PMjgd, the reason I haven't responded to Ricky Lee is, in part, because he hasn't bothered to formulate an argument. To "what about..." I say, what about it? The other part of it I guess is I know it's not an honest inquiry. He's just trying to taunt me by throwing things at a wall and hoping something will stick.
jgd, you're losing alot credibility by claiming 'the republicans" are for what you want and "the democrats" are against what you want. Actually, you're just not being honest. "Me" is right in the sense that the big business view (Bush's view) is out there and it's a driving force. But it's not the only view or influence. As I've mentioned before there are competing views in the proposal, which includes many Republicans. But you have to make a honest inquiry to the news (say, read a newspaper) to discover this.
Spare us the crap about non-citizens voting. They can't. Period. If we allow some a path to citizenship, and they take it, it's going to happen 8-13 years down the line, or longer. A lot of things change in that tim. As hard as it may seem to you, some of us, including Democratic and Republican politicians want to do the right thing. Of course, you are free to see the whole world as being against you--in which case, why argue about it? So you can get others to think the whole world is against them too? That doesn't do diddly squat to resolve the problem.
Posted by anderson on May 31, 2007 07:37 PMAnderson,
The point I was trying to make is I believe both parties have their own selfish reasons. for wanting this bill. Republicans for the cheap labor and the Democrats for the votes, future and current.
As I having clearly stated before in "86" the citizens of this country did in fact grant amnesty to 3 million illegals, with the understanding that it would never happen again because we were also promised secure borders.
This time I refuse to accept promises, from our elected officials who both parties have their own selfish reasons for getting this bill passed.
In "86" we did what was right and we were cheated out of the border security. The existing 12 -20 million illegals are living proof of that. This time we should demand the border security we were promised in "86" is in place and doing the job it is suppose to do before we do "what is right and human"
That is not racist, inhuman, unfeeling or any other adjective you can come up with.
Posted by jgd777 on May 31, 2007 07:56 PMThe reason, anderson, in whole, you've not answered the question is because you're a coward.
Why should I "formulate an argument"?
I will, though.
I argue that the vast majority of American CITIZENS are fed up with illegal immigrants, and you're giving your small intestine a very thorough visual inspection when you try to refute that FACT.
So, there's an argument, smarty.
One more time, anderson,
What do you think about the 82% of the people in the N.Y. Times poll that said they're in favor of tighening border security?
Posted by RickyLee on May 31, 2007 08:07 PMHey jgs--show where, anywhere, where I mentioned anything about Congress and how the votes are broken down. Go ahead, I dare you.
You are smart enough to understand that the illegals (Mexicans to you) are mainly conservative Catholics? That they're anti-abortion, anti-homosexual, ect? That certainly doesn't qualify them as automatically voting Democrat...
Posted by Me on May 31, 2007 08:16 PMRickylee: "Why should I "formulate an argument"?"
1. So you don't look like a stupid jerk.
2. To give the appearance that you might have something to offer to the conversation.
"stupid jerk"? Call the kettle black, pal.
You're clearly runnung scared from the question. BOO!
Anyone who'd like to hear andersons opinion, speak up.
In the mean time, anderson:
What do you think about the 82% of the people in the N.Y. Times poll that said they're in favor of tighening border security?
Why are you so afraid to simply type your opinion of the overwhelming majority in that poll?
Posted by RickyLee on May 31, 2007 08:30 PMBTW, anderson, you failed to aknowledge that in my 8:07 post I DID IN FACT "formulate an argument", and you still persisted to elude my simple, concise, and valid question. You're really showing your mettle here, aren't you?
So I'll ask again, in case you forgot what it was:
What do you think about the 82% of the people in the N.Y. Times poll that said they're in favor of tighening border security?
Posted by RickyLee on May 31, 2007 08:35 PMMe,
You weren't implying that Republicans were the ones pushing for this bill? Maybe your statements lead me to believe you were, statements like:
"Here's a clue for you Brian--this is about big business and their interest (the bottom line). Cheap labor=more profit. Who controls big business? Why, it would be mostly Republicans. See how that works?"
or
"GWB is the one pushing this legislation."
And I am sure you believe Teddy K and Pelois are pushing for this bill just out of the kindness of their heart. They are not even thinking about how many more votes they will get in the future for their "Nanny state" or open borders.
Check the voting records and you will find out the people who are pushing for more illegals and who are the ones pushing for tighter border security
Posted by jgd777j on May 31, 2007 08:39 PMAnderson said:
Spare us the crap about non-citizens voting. They can't. Period.
You must be dellusional or extremely naive my friend, with a fake drivers license and signed affidavit that they are registered voters they can AND DO VOTE. Call the Secretary of State and find out for yourself. Of course they are not supposed to vote. I'm sure that will stop them. These honest folks wouldn't think of breaking our laws.
Of course with the passage of 1313 they won't even have to work for the right to vote. A driver's license will be available to all with very little documentation. Drivers license = voter. Say goodbye to CO
Posted by on May 31, 2007 10:47 PMLatinos will not vote Democrat even if they can. They are anti-choice, anti-homo, anti birth control, can`t join unions if they are illegal.
Republicans honor the law and hard work, they are going to have to make a choice between one of these or the other because with illegals they can`t have both.
democrats may actually want to help illegals move toward legal for the good of everyone, but Republicans want cheap labor for their big corporations.
Does Kennedy or Pelosi make a dime off of illegals?
Do the big fat cat businesses like Kellog, kuners etc. Who owns these companys and who has stock in them.
Stockholders are driving the illegal problem. They get more dividends from cheap labor.
If anyone thinks the Republicans give a tinkers dam for the middle class and will try to protect it they are smoking some wierd stuff.
Posted by Sharon B. on June 1, 2007 05:25 AMOK, J(ust)G(ood)and(Dumb), let 's see if I can put this plainly enough for your pea-sized brain to understand...
I said absolutely nothing about Congress or voting records. Are all republicans members of Congress? No. Can one be a republican and push your agenda through donations and influence? Yes.
I guess you're just not bright enough to understand that politicians (of any party) are simply show-ponies. Very few of them are smart enough to write their own speeches, much less formulate public policy. That is the think tanks, PAC's speech writers and "advisors" are for. Politicians are just the bought and sold pretty face that's sold to the voters.
So, one can be a republican and not be a member of Congress and still push for keeping their profits high by exploting cheap and illegal immigration.
But then, I imagine that you're one of these people who rants about how evil Soros and Moveon are, but will turn blue in the face denying that the Republican party is influenced/funded in a similar manner.
Posted by Hmmm on June 1, 2007 09:31 AMToday's Post affirms Peter Boyle: The illegal immigrant is infected with drug resistant TB. Bring back Ellis Island if you get my drift.
Tombstone: Here lies Jerry Falwell (if I was into name-calling: Foulwell) “who hated gays, lesbians, pagans, atheists, evolutionists, pluralists, non-absolutists, members of the ACLU, people for the ethical treatment of others people, abortion providers, secular humanists, human secularists, liberals, leftists, civil right’s supporters, people who need people, democrats, the educated Arabs, Jews, Muslims, godless media, non-church goers who didn’t read the
Bible or believe in Jesus or vote Republican, pets owned by anyone who doesn’t pray, claimed 9/11 was god’s punishment generated by his domestic enemies, women and men who …” Looks like Foulwell ran out of tombstone.
Tombstone:
Here lies Richard Grimes..Had a chance at eternal life with His creator, the Lord Jesus who loved him so much that He gave His life's blood for him......but instead chose to spend eternity with Satan and his minions, to be tortured mercilessly for ever,
and ever,
and ever,
Looks like Richard ran out of tombstone but eternity will continue on.....
for ever.
Yo Skeptical: It is a god I despise as much as I despise Jehovah, Jesus, and their Ghost who rapes the Virgin Mary to create a Jew coming from the “loins of David,” or “Joseph the carpenter,” to be transmogrified into a Christian god who hates Jews. To wit, god by Wafa Sultan highly abridged:
Do you know what I had learned at this age (5)? God will burn you in hell forever if you say the word “no” to your parents. God will cut you into pieces if a man sees a strand of your hair. God will force you on Judgment Day to walk on needles if you enter the bathroom with your right foot. God will barbeque you if you pass gas while you’re praying. But if you believe in his rule, you will live forever in his paradise.
By the age of ten, I became mentally paralyzed: Walking on a road of eggs, trying not to crush them, in order to avoid the cruelty of our monster.
I say by the age of ten, because a young girl is considered a woman at this age. At that age, I received the first message from out imagined god through his man, Prophet Muhammad. The message said: “A woman is nothing but a shame. Her marriage will cover up one-tenth of this shame and her grave will cover up the rest of it.