October 2007 | Main

November 17, 2007
Taxes and health care

Leroy M Martinez of Denver writes:

Gov. Ritter want to raise taxes in 2008 for Health Care, Education and Transportation. Anyone want to tell me where did the monies for Referendum C go to. This is for all the suckers that voted all the recent tax increases. If you have a choice, keep your own money.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Gov. Ritter and unions

Don Bevis of Aurora writes:

Governor Ritter wants to improve the productivity of the state workforce. So let’s see, he used the expertise of the works of Management Consultant, Peter F. Drucker; or maybe he contracted with the Leeds or Daniels Schools of Business. No, he chose labor unions to improve productivity.
I wondered how he developed this brilliant idea.
Well maybe he saw how the unions almost put the entire US automobile industry under. Or could it be the way the unions put some airlines in bankruptcy. At United, they even bought, ran the company and hand- picked a lackey CEO. They proceeded to then put this company out of business. That’s a good model.
Well how about the teacher’s union and the disaster that is our public schools? Another good model. In spite of the fact that our children can’t get a decent education, they fight progressive ideas such as vouchers and charter schools. And what a management model to follow- we can’t have math teachers, in short supply, paid more than other disciplines in excess supply; and we must pay teachers according to schooling and years teaching not according to test results or the ability to teach and to inspire our kids. Want to fire an incompetent teacher. It’s almost impossible. One more good union template for effective management of the state of Colorado, Governor.
Maybe the Governor is finding a good model for union-government cooperation from old Europe. That’s worked so well that Germany and France elected conservatives to help turnaround double-digit unemployment and years of stagnant economies. A union-government cooperative spirit resulted in two pieces of the new A380 not fitting together properly. And in France it’s been the strike of the week, doctors this week, transit workers next and then the nurses and museum workers follow. That’s something to look forward to in Colorado.
Governor Ritter seems like a bright man who surely knows these facts. I have to assume then that this is nothing but a payback for big labor’s campaign contributions and an apology for vetoing a terrible pro labor bill earlier in the year.
One term governor? That may be too long.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Former Gov. Owens on Gov. Ritter’s unions

Anne M. Austin of Pine writes:

“Owens assails Ritter’s order on unions” (RMN 11-7-07) struck a nerve. According to the article, Former Gov. Owens states, “the computers are a straw man he’s (Gov. Ritter) hiding behind. He needs to step up and explain why collective bargaining is the way to go...” First of all, using the term “collective bargaining” without adding the qualifier “partnership” is misleading, because it’s never been just about “bargaining". If the quote is accurate and not taken out of context, somebody’s not getting the point about the computer. It’s not a straw man for the Governor to hide behind, it’s “the tip of the iceberg". Even if the two-thirds of the iceberg that lies below water were more realistically a huge pile of melded blocks of ice, the analogy would hold true. Each one of those ice blocks would represent a governmental project, program or issue poorly handled, poorly planned and/or poorly executed. If employees were allowed “their two-cents worth", each block could provide an opportunity for a “partnership” of ideas, viewpoints, and experiences to generally improve the efficiency, productivity, economy and social climate of State work environments. The concept that any employee, whether in the private or public sector, is not worth listening to because of his/her position on the corporate ladder (and Yes, Virginia, the government has one of those, too) should have been eradicated eons ago.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Roan plateau is a treasure

John Bergman of Aurora writes:

The Roan Plateau, A Colorado treasure is among the four most biologically diverse areas in Colorado and is the only one of these four areas that is not protected. NOt only is the Roan Plateau home to native plant species and wildlife but also provides open spaces for a wide variety of outdoor activities. These activities are not only what colorado is known for but also a large driving force behind our local economy. The Bureau of Land Management leases 70% of land to the Oil and Gas industries and the Roan Plateau shouls not be added to theis statistic. All 70% of lesed land has yet to be drilled so what is the rush to add the Roan to the List?! As Colorado citizens we should wnat to protect the remaining undeveloped public lands. The BLM’s own environmental impact state says that “Areas of high quality wildlife habitat would be lost or permanently altered.” Opening the Roan Plateau would bring drilling rigs, well pads compressor stations, pipe lines, roads, hevy ruck traffic, and so much more. All of the aspects of drilling are not compatable with the outdoor environment and activities. Where has our local pride gone? Has it too been bought by the Oil and Gas Industry? We as Coloradans can stop this and should before it is too late. Keep the Roan Plateau untouched, support life and this public space to the list of protected Wilderness!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Homelessness and mental illness

George DelGrosso of Denver writes:

Thank you for drawing attention to the problem of homelessness and mental illness among U.S. veterans in your article Thursday, “25% of Homeless Are Veterans, Report Says.”
Homelessness is just one of the many negative impacts as policy and funding priorities overlook the mental health needs of our heroes. The problems are sobering: • One in every eight U.S. veterans (1.8 million) under the age of 65 does not have any health coverage.
• Each year, about 1,000 U.S. veterans commit suicide.
• More veterans from the Vietnam war have committed suicide than were killed in the war – more than 58,000.
• A Pentagon study in 2006 found that 35 percent of veterans returning from Afghanistan and Iraq have sought help for a mental health disorder. Many who experience symptoms of a mental health disorder do not seek help.
• About 50 percent of returning Reservists and National Guard members have reported symptoms of a mental disorder.
• Soldiers must wait 2 1?2 months for a mental health appointment at VA facilities.
• About 15 percent of all heart attack victims are people with post-traumatic stress syndrome.
• About 700,000 U.S. children have one or more parent who is deployed and must cope with the stress of that deployment. These children also are at risk and many need community-based services.
As the experts in your column indicated, there could be a surge of demand for mental health services building on the battlefield and at home. The mental health toll from this war is enormous and we are feeling it in Colorado. We should make every day Veterans Day and reach out to our friends and neighbors who have served valiantly. It’s time to help our heroes and support them when they return home.
We need to fund mental health treatment adequately, cut the red tape, and integrate these services with general health services to provide these heroes with the care that they deserve. The VA system can’t do it alone. We need localized and community-based services in every corner of Colorado and in every state. We should urge our U.S. Senators to support Senate Bill 31, which will help the community mental health system provide adequate care to these soldiers in their hometowns. We should urge state and local leaders to support similar initiatives across Colorado. This mission will not be accomplished until these soldiers and their families receive proper assistance.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Paper ballots are the answer

James Frye of Aurora writes:

Re: Machine madness As I read the story on the voting machine conundrum and gazed at the associated picture of a huge warehouse of voting machines, I just shook by head.
The story goes on to describe the dilemma the various counties have with voting machines that are probably not going to be certified and ready to go by the 2008 election.
Every time I read these stories, I wonder why we don’t just do away with individual electronic machines.
Wouldn’t it be easier to just have all paper ballots that are read by a scanning machine and not deal with hundreds and thousands of individual voting machines?
This would also address the issue of a “paper trail”
that many voters are concerned about. Using only a paper ballot, whether by mail ballot or voting in person would simplify the entire process.
My observation of the recently completed all mail balloting in Arapahoe and Jefferson county is that they appeared to have been handled very efficiently.
The majority of the voting results were already posted on their web sites by 7pm, election night.
As for the city and county of Denver voting problems, they will apparently occur regardless of the voting system. Denver can’t seem to get its act together, whatever they try.
If the legislation does address this issue, to allow an all mail ballot in the presidential election, they should also give the counties the option of conducting an all mail ballot every year, if they so chose.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Greenhouse gases

Russell W. Shurts of Centennial writes:

Watching Football Night in America last week it was obvious in one segment that something had gone wrong with NBC’s picture because there wasn’t one even though I could hear Bob Costas talking. There wasn’t anything wrong at all, however; only the latest attempt to convince people to reduce their greenhouse gases, or as I like to call it, devolve back to the Stone Age.
If you will hear me out, though, I believe I have a simple an elegant solution to the greenhouse gas problem. If everyone who really believes humankind is in imminent grave danger from man-made global warming would immediately commit suicide; then except for a little energy expended putting them into the ground their carbon footprint would immediately go to zero, and I could go back to watching football without being subjected to ridiculous and bogus political screeds masquerading as science.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Voting machine controversy

Martha Monsson of Fort Morgan writes:

In your article on the voting machine controversy, you quote Dan Wallach, associate professor of computer science at Rice University, as saying, “You shouldn’t need to trust your people....One poll worker could effectively compromise every single voting machine in the county.” Not only is that not true in Morgan County, it is an insult to hard-working poll workers, who put in long hours out of a sense of duty. I am prepared to listen to an apology whenever Dr.
Wallach wants to give one. I cannot, of course, speak for any other poll workers. I will not hold my breath waiting for an apology.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Gov. Ritter betrayed tax payers

Stephen H. Cohn of Northglenn writes:

Gov. Bill Ritter betrayed all taxpayers and voters by issuing an executive order that will enable state workers to form unions.
This union issue should have been a topic discussed and dealt with in the legislature.
Bypassing the legislature may be legal, but it is a slap in the face to representative government. The betrayal is Governor Ritter’s second. He and the Democrat-controlled legislature bypassed voters and taxpayers when they froze property tax mill levy rates without a vote, as required by the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights.
Maybe Governor Ritter should be renamed King William Ritter.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Gov. Ritter’s executive order

Jill Eden of Aurora writes:

After teaching civics the past 20 years, I realized I have been misinforming my students that we have three branches of government. Our Founding Fathers created this system of checks and balances so no one branch of government would become too powerful.
However, Gov. Bill Ritter chose to circumvent this system and govern via executive order (“Guv backs state unions,” Nov. 3).
We elect our state legislators and governor with the expectation they adhere to this brilliant system. Yes, the governor has the authority to issue such a document, nevertheless it should be used in very rare circumstances, such as emergencies, not to pander to the union bosses.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

November 16, 2007
Gov. Ritter’s executive order for unions

Kenneth A. Gansmann of Silverthorne writes:

Bill Ritter’s 11th executive order to recognize unions in Colorado State Government is a lot of smoke and mirrors and just his way to payback union leaders who helped fund his election campaign. Proponents of Ritter’s 11th hour executive order which circumvented normal legislative discussions say “It is so narrowly crafted that it affects only State employees.”
No, it affects all of us Colorado taxpayers. It is a little known and less publicized fact that the only growth in unions in the U.S. today is in federal and state governments - all funded by us taxpayers.
We need to put a stop to this right now!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

When will people be held accountable?

Joseph G, Martinez of Brighton writes:

We have had many unlawful things happen during the Bush Administration and my question is, when will people be held accountable? When will the person or persons be prosecuted and put in jail for outing a CIA Agent. Outing the Agent borders on being a traitor. When will a bunch of people, including the President and Vice-President, be prosecuted and put in jail for torture, especially waterboarding, using laws already on the books. Bush wants a new law about torture when the new AG gets in, a law that will absolve those who have approved and used torture.
Obviously it seems that nobody in Congress has the political courage to to move forward with prosecution of those who are guilty. The Bush Administration is probably the worst ever in the history of the USA. It’s time to get those who lack political courage out of office.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Noisy neighbors are inconsiderate

E. Kiefel of Wheat Ridge writes:

Regarding “Tooting Their Own Horn,” a full-page article by Julie Poppen, in your 11/6/07 edition, why did you play into the hands of two obviously juvenile senior citizens? Being noise sensitive, I thoroughly sympathize with their neighbors.
Times and boundaries change, and people must be considerate of their neighbors. If I had such noise emanating from a neighbor, you can be assured I would contact the proper authorities in lieu of strangulation. Mrs. Priest’s additional inconsideration by putting up her “Honk If You Like the Broncos” sign in her yard, to add insult to injury,?further attests to lack of maturity. If the Priests, whose hearing might somewhat be impaired, want to make noise, let them move to the Arctic so they can serenade the polar bears.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Passage of A through I good for children

Monique Lovato of Denver writes:

Mile High Montessori students, staff, board of directors, parents and supporters owe Denver voters a big ‘thank you’ for the passage of issues A through I and especially 1B. We serve nearly 1,000 kids a year, mostly in city facilities. Quality early childhood education is expensive for most families and would be out of reach for the families we serve except for a delicate balance of parent fees, private donations, and local, state, and federal investment that doesn’t provide for building improvements.
The passage of 1B means our kids will play on safer playgrounds, learn in more comfortable classrooms and have continued funding because our facilities won’t impede quality scores. Our teachers and cooks are grateful as well. Clean, cheerful, functional classrooms and kitchens boost their morale.
All this adds up to school readiness for children that could start off on the short end of an achievement gap that never closes, but the children we serve leave us on a level playing field with their more privileged peers.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Congrats to Michael Mukasey

Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

Congratulation to judge Michael Mukasey for standing his ground against the Senate Judiciary Committee! What the Rocky Mountain News calls “Mukasey’s misstep” is, in essence, the key to his credibility. The committee, anxious to excoriate the Bush Administration for what it calls “torture” of terrorist suspects, had the tables turned on them instead. The truth of the matter is that interrogation techniques—call them what you will—are imperative in time of war. If waterboarding, or any other form of interrogation, would have prevented an attack such as 9/11, that in itself would justify its application. Yet, some will stop at nothing to advance their own political agenda, even in time of war. The Attorney General nomination is a case in point.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Modifications to Title VII

Dick and Pidge Gray of Montrose writes:

After reading about the modifications to Title VII of H.R.3221, the “New Direction for Energy Independence, National Security and Consumer Protection Act” and having read about the problems in Port Arthur, TX as well as De Beque, CO, it appears to us that much needs to be done by both the House and Senate to come up with suitable regulations of the oil and gas industry. These regulations should be more stringent than what the industry now enjoys. We are concerned that without these regulations and their enforcement, there will continue to be much damage to the environment. Some of the modifications will cause the industry to better pay it’s way and relieve some of the taxpayers burdens. We are also concerned that our government really doesn’t care about the average people and their land. It also appears that the EPA has been severely limited in what it can do by the Executive branch. That needs to change.
Existing laws need to be enforced and new provisions need to be added to protect our nation’s health, especially in the areas of oil and gas drilling and refining. Also, our water supplies, both surface and sub-surface, need to be protected. We would also add that all vehicle mile-per-gallon standards need to be increased sooner than later.
Finally, we believe that renewable energy from geothermal, biomass, wind and solar means need to increase. We have a choice, either we make positive changes now and prolong our world or do nothing and let our world be destroyed as we know it.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Election counting problems

Leroy M Martinez of Denver writes:

The Denver County Clerk urges an all mail in ballots for 2008. Please, Denver cannot even handle a small election. How will they handle a larger election.
This is because they are having trouble getting their machines. How long will this madness go on.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Homeless veterans

Ron Vander Kooi of Arvada writes:

It is no surprise to me that new studies show that one of four of the homeless, over 194,000 of them, are veterans —with increasing numbers from Iraq and Afghanistan (The Rocky Mountain News, Nov. 8). We should know that “war is hell” —even for many veterans already “home.” Just watch the current reruns of “The War” on PBS, to be reminded of that war is a mix of dirt, drudgery, wounding and death.
I spent almost fifty years as a sociologist studying and working with the homeless. Each time I got to know someone living on the streets, I found a tragic story -too often related to war. I challenge the reader to talk to a homeless person sometime. Ask whether the person is a veteran and “what it like to be on the streets?” If the person is not intoxicated or disturbed, you may learn something worthwhile learning about his or her life. (Be very careful to pick a safe, public situation, though, frankly, life is far more dangerous for the homeless person on the streets than it will be for you in your short visit there.) When I was a boy, my family went with my father who was an Army chaplain to camps in the South. I remember some good soldiers and I was taken to a few Army funerals. Thus, I hate to hear people say, “If you’re not for the Iraqi war, you’re against the soldiers.” Baloney!!! And as for certain talk jocks who utter such insults, on what I call “hate radio,” we should exclaim the famous phrase directed to Sen. Joe McCarthy, “HAVE YOU NO SHAME?”
It is time for Americans to frankly recognize what war does to people.
Even more important, we need leaders who know how to pursue peace through discussion and honesty, not those who believe that we can win through confrontation and power. This will become increasingly clear as more nations, friends and foes of today, come to have atomic power.
Until we and our leaders learn to talk and deal honestly, our whole nation, not just the homeless and other disenfranchised people, will become more uprooted and divided.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Pakistan the most dangerous

Leonard Muniz of Broomfield writes:

IRAQ, IRAN AND SYRIA ARE NOT THE REAL PROBLEM According to Newsweek, Time, CNN and other news outlets, today no other country on earth is arguably more dangerous than Pakistan. It has everything Osama bin Laden could ask for: political instability, a trusted network of radical Islamists, an abundance of angry young anti-Western recruits, secluded training areas, access to state-of-the art electronic technology, regular air service to the West and security services that don’t always do what they’re supposed to do. In addition there also aren’t thousands of American troops hunting down would-be terrorists. Then, Pakistan has a nuclear program. If you were to look around the world for where Al Qaeda is going to find its bomb, its right in their own backyard, says Bruce Riedel, the former senior director for South Asia on the National Security Council. Nothing has infuriated the Islamic community more than the US invasion of Iraq, except for the US supplying Israel with bombs, tanks, planes, guns, rockets and plenty of money. And I don’t believe that the exacerbation specialist Bush is the right man for this job.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Fair elections need to be implemented

Daryl Shute of Littleton writes:

America’s politicians and elections are for sale to the highest bidders. Intentional or not, the system is undercutting our democracy. Americans have long understood that special interests buy preferential treatment. Now, however, the majoritys will is blatantly thwarted in favor of corrupt crony capitalism with impunity.
It is time to entice citizens with the countrys common good at heart back to the election process. This will only happen when big money interests are unable to buy the elections. Fair Elections levels the playing field by giving well qualified people a chance to run for office regardless of wealth or political connections. Grassroots candidates have a viable chance against seasoned incumbents and prolific fundraisers.
Where Fair Elections has been implemented, it has been successful. More people from diverse backgrounds are runningand winning. In the 2006 elections, more than 200 Fair Elections candidates in three states, Arizona, Maine, and North Carolina, were elected to serve in legislative, judicial, and statewide offices.
Once in office, Fair Elections candidates are free to legislate without regard to who helped pay for their campaign. They work for their constituents, not big money campaign contributors.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

November 15, 2007
Cattle responsible for global warming

Jeff Kocsis of Littleton writes:

Now we know that cattle are largely responsible for global warming because of all that methane being emitted by their flatulence (“Don’t have a cow, man,” On Point, Oct. 17). This brings up several interesting questions: I once read that there were an estimated 60 million bison roaming around North America before the arrival of the Europeans. This doesn’t include all the Asian and African buffaloes, wildebeests, etc., who were doubtless flatulating up a storm for millions of years. Does this mean, perhaps, that the global warming that has been ongoing since the end of the last Ice Age may, in fact, have been primarily caused by these large animals?
How could nature, in its mindless but infinite wisdom, have allowed such a creature to evolve and so upset the ecological balance? Might the dinosaurs have similarly gassed themselves into extinction? Did the global cooling that occurred during the 19th century occur because we killed off so many American bison? Should we begin exterminating these un-green creatures (cattle, bison, buffalo, wildebeest, etc.) before they once again gas themselves and all humanity into ex-stink-tion?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Abortion should never be acceptable

Robert E. Forman of Lakewood writes:

In a recent letter, Mark McCabe writes “When will people realize that the issue of abortion is a personal issue?” (“Where will they stop?” Nov. 2.)
I hope the answer is “never.”
I hope that men and women of good character and morals who are saddened, heartbroken and outraged at the slaughter of innocent human lives will always far outnumber those who think that the murder of innocent human lives is nothing more than a “personal choice” that should be “understood” and “condoned.”
Certainly there are times when the murder, the killing and/or the death of another person can be “understood” and “condoned.” Self-defense. Defense of another. Times of war. Capital punishment of the guilty.
But abortion — the murder of an innocent unborn human life fits none of those “acceptable” criteria.
The abortion of an innocent human life — a little unborn baby — is mankind at its lowest. And any defense of abortion is mankind at its civilized worst.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Bronco “fans” go too far

Anson Rohr of Westminster writes:

Please don’t glorify Larry and Jeri Priest or feel sorry for them. They sound like a couple of jerks. If they love the sound of their “noise machine” so much, why don’t they turn the thing around so it faces THEIR house? What is the point in turning it towards their neighbor’s house, except to annoy and harrass them? And what kind of fans would willingly try to hurt an unborn child by bothering a pregnant wife?
I bet the Broncos organization would be embarrassed to have these two goons on their side. I also think Larry Priest’s actions are an embarrassment to the Marine Corps. What do these two “fans” plan to do once the neighbor’s baby is born? Continue to stress both mother and child with this unnecessary noise? What jerks.
I usually don’t feel sorry for attorneys, but I hope this one sues the pants off Mr. and Mrs. Priest.
By the way, is there no Law Enforcement in their section of Adams County? How about a ticket to Larry and Jeri Priest for causing a public nuisance, Sheriff Darr?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Electoral college comments

Cody Cummins of Parker writes:

I agree with Mike Rosen that hypocrisy plays a major part in recent ballot initiatives in several states. Although I haven’t voted yet (I am a sophomore at Ponderosa High School), I want my vote to count as a Colorado citizen. If my vote is with the majority, the majority should rule, and all of the electoral votes should go to the winning party. If my vote is with the minority, then I have to support those who are in the majority. Mike Rosen clears up the misconception about our constitutional republic, and the role of the Electoral College in maintaining the voices of each of the United States. Politicians who want to make changes to benefit their party do not have the interest of the nation at heart.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Ft. Collins A.K.A. Grinchville

Robyn Faber of Westminster writes:

THE STATE OF COLORADO: Sometime in near future.
BREAKING NEWS: Fort Collins (a.k.a. Grinchville) declares “CHRISTMAS TOO CONTROVERSIAL". Elected officials state, “We must protect our citizens from Constitutional freedoms: ie. “...life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness". Personal interpretation, celebration, and enjoyment of this holiday is strictly prohibited! Never fear! The Coloradoan will publish an officially approved list of “shopping sites and public displays". Citizens are encouraged to call city hall and report any “banned activity”
relating to this state censored event.
ADDENDUM: It is reported that all Fort Collins’ Christians are protesting the loss of Constitutional freedoms by boycotting all sanctioned shops, restaurants, and public events in Fort Collins, Colorado. Stay tuned for more breaking news...

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Paul Campos & the Constitution

Will Ropke of Franktown writes:

There is great irony in Paul Campos’s observation (today) that the US Constitution is outdated. The reason it seems outdated today is that it has been subverted and ignored in the past. The original purpose of the Constitution was to limit the power and scope of the federal government * vis-à-vis* the states and the individual citizens. When the federal government was very small, it didn’t matter that it wasn’t very democratic (and there were good reasons for it not to be).
But like professors Campos and Levinson, I too have fallen out of love with the Constitution. A document can never limit the power of a government, because it is “interpreted” by that same government itself. It is inevitable that, over time, the Supreme Court will, by and large, “discover”
that the Constitution authorizes ever greater power to its host. What we really need are highly decentralized governments, even down to individual communities. Democracy can work only on a very small scale. Mass democracy invariably becomes an engine to allow favored interests (large corporations, government bureaucracies, defense contractors, big banks, etc.) to loot the mass of productive citizens who are just trying to live their lives in peace.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

U.S. now tortures

Chris Shonka, no hometown provided, writes:

I am a veteran; 4 years in the US Navy. I recall boot camp training and how we, if captured, were to deal with torture. We were to give name, rank and serial number. That was it. As for our forces torturing, forget it. It didn’t happen. We were the good guys. Only Evil Empires tortured. Nazis tortured. Imperial Japan tortured. Communist China and the Soviet Union tortured.
Now, apparently, so do we.
God bless America.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Chandler Grafner’s parents want to sue

Leroy M Martinez of Denver writes:

So the parents of Chandler Grafner want to sue because of the death of their son that was under the supervision of young Chandler’s step dad. Is it not strange that the state took Chandler away in the first place because their parents were not parents? They are suing for $150K for each biological parent. I SAY, IT IS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Denver Election Commission

John Warren of Denver writes:

Well, here we go again with the Denver Election Commission. What is wrong with these people? After all of the mis-steps in previous elections, after all the promises made to make an election run smoothly from the Mayor on down, they still can’t get it right. THIS time, it is the fault of the citizens who have exercised their constitutional rights and VOTED. For the Commission to say the slow count is the fault of the citizens is one of the craziest things I have ever heard, and believe me, after living in Denver for thirty years, I have heard some pretty dumb things coming from the City, excuse wise that is.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Makes me want to vote Republican

Sam Taylor of Wheat Ridge writes:

I find it amusing that a three times married, cross dressing, anti-gun, ex-mayor of New York City who placed the headquarters of “terrorism” in the twin towers after the first bombing in 1993, whose children detest him, and who recommended a thug for the post of Home Land Security Director has received the endorsement for president by a homophobic, pro-gun religious zealot who claims to champion “family values” and who blamed the American people for the 9-11 attack because of their evil ways.
This sure makes me want to vote republican.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Uneven justice

What has happened to our country when a woman gets 50 hours of community service for the murder of her newborn child (“Woman must get mental health help,” Oct. 27) while several people are facing the possibility of six years in prison for jumping on a police car? (“Five people charged for damage to cruiser,” Oct. 25.)

Pete Hankey, Erie

Posted by denver-admin at 01:13 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

November 14, 2007
Smoking ban on CU campus

M. Andersen of Brighton writes:

I read where there will be disussions about banning smoking on Boulder’s CU campus for..and i quote, “health reasons". What an ambitious concept! But here is a thought. A more innovating issue for the same and many other reasons would be banning alchohol on the campus! Any takers on the chance of that ever happening?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (18) | TrackBack

Response to Mike Rosen

Lucas Quintero, high school student at Ponderosa HS writes:

Below is my response to Mike Rosen’s “Electoral Hypocrisy” (11-02-07).
Dear Mr. Rosen, I am currently a sophomore at Ponderosa High School registered in a United States Government class. After reading you November 2nd editorial, I completely agreed to your main points. As you said, “This [POPULAR VOTES] would marginalize less-populous states.” If you compare Colorado to California you would see that California has 6.111 times the electoral votes that Colorado has. If you compare the populations then you would see that California has 7.67 times the population of Colorado. This means with a popular vote Colorado would receive less of a say in deciding our nation’s leader. Not only Colorado, but most of the other states will also have little importance in the decision in the election. You said, “The single standard at work here, obviously, is whatever’s good for Democrats.” So shouldn’t Republican’s be attempting the same in Democratic states? If Democrats are taking votes from Republican states, shouldn’t Republicans take votes from Democratic states? By the way shouldn’t we, as republicans, want Colorado to be popular vote state? Especially since Colorado is becoming a Democratic state? In 1988, Bush (R) won the popular vote in Colorado 53.1% to Dukakis’ (D) 45.3%. In 2004, Bush (R) won 52% to Kerry’s (D) 47%. Overall I feel that the idea of a national popular vote is okay, only if the whole nation abolishes electoral votes.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (15) | TrackBack

Funding bill for Iraq

Robert Ketterhagen of Boulder writes:

As we approach yet another funding bill for the Iraq war, president Bush has asked Congress to pay attention to the Generals “in the field” rather than the Move On.org bloggers or code pink.
First of all, Mr. Bush needs to understand that an efficient Democracy is based upon a well informed public with OPEN debate. In such a system, no one, not even God himself, dictates what is of more importance.
It’s all important, it’s all free speech! Let us do our job; let us (WE THE PEOPLE) decide! Which, by the way, I think we have, just not loudly and persistently enough.
I do agree that we need to listen to the military; but not his hand picked Generals sitting in air conditioning in the fortified green zone. We need to hear from the boots on the ground, the soldiers who are doing the dirty work, many of whom, pay the ultimate price. At ivaw.org is account after account of soldiers who feel betrayed. Not only mislead initially (i.e. WMD, Saddam ties to Al Qaida, etc.) but also little or no care upon their return. Over 100 Iraq vets killed themselves last year, one out of every four homeless people are vets.
Support the troops? Are you listening Mr. Udall!!
We need to support these brave souls at ivaw in whatever way possible! Call Congress and Demand no more funding for the Iraq war!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (30) | TrackBack

Counting Denver ballots

Leroy M Martinez of Denver writes:

There are five steps in counting the Denver Ballots. Each step has several smaller steps. During a certain step, judges copy the marks of the voters and then re do the step in the machine. PLEASE, go back to the voting machines. Too many human errors can happen.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Mayor stole A thru I

John Wren of Denver writes:

Your article glorifies the Mayor’s massive manipulation as he stole the A thru I election. He spent an incredible $1 million on an advertising and promotional campaign to sell Denver the big lie that a citizens committee of 115 wanted A thru I.
This massive campaign, an “investment” of those who would split up the take, used telemarketing to contact every one of the 470,000 voters in Denver, and this telephone sales campaign identified the gullible and feeble minded, and then stayed in touch with those 50,000 or so suckers until they returned their mail-in ballots, going to their door to pick up the ballot when necessary!
420,000 voted no or were so discouraged they didn’t vote at all. 420,000 out of 470,000! The Mayor has perfected this technique, and now it is glorified in your very biased coverage of the campaign.
In the past one of our daily newspapers would have spoken out about this obvious manipulation. But now that there is no real competition between the papers, the people have lost their watchdog. I think that is the reason for the declining circulation of both papers.
Denver citizens need to organize now to prevent the next assault. We need an early warning system, a citizens grassroots network that can spot these efforts as they begin and mount an organized campaign to see that the election truly reflect the will of the majority of Denver citizens.
Those who are concerned are invited to join various grassroots rallies. Our first project is to encourage concerned citizens to register by the December 5 deadline to be able to participate in the February 5 Colorado Caucus. For more information see —http://cocacop.meetup.com/2— (http://cocacop.meetup.com/2)

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Beltway proposal

Dick Sugg of Golden writes:

I tied to respond to the Nov 4th Speakout article by Dan Green, but was unable to do so on-line. Here is my response.
Writer Dan Green says “the facts are,” but he is obviously unaware of many facts.
1) The need for the beltway has never been supported by traffic analysis. The 2000 NW Quadrant Feasibility Study, conducted by CH2MHill, showed that the best way to improve mobility and reduce future congestion in Northern Jeffco would be to improve the N-S arterials, rather than complete the beltway. After the on-going NW Corridor EIS was under way, CDOT concocted a need for a beltway connection by changing the original Purpose and Need Statement from including improvements to local roads (such as SH-93, Wadsworth, McIntyre and Ward) to serving regional and inter-regional traffic (mostly commuters, not local residents) via the western beltway.
2) Only a small fraction of the southbound I-25 traffic is headed for the mountains via I-70, and that traffic is mostly on weekends, when commuter traffic is low. The “congested central core of Denver” is easily avoided by drivers using I-76 from I-25; drivers coming from Boulder and Longmont face little congestion on week ends by using SH-93 and US-6 to get to I-70 West.
3) The facts from the EIS are that building the western toll highway would reduce future traffic on Wadsworth from 65,000 vehicles per day only to 60,000.
The reason that Wadsworth traffic is heavy, and three times as much as projected for the toll highway, is that commercial development is so dense, especially just north of I-70. Why would Broomfield or north Arvada drivers opt to pay a toll going west to Golden and then back-track to the east on SH-58 and I-70 to get to their Wadsworth destinations?
4) The idea of completing the beltway down the Indiana-McIntyre corridor was addressed in the NW Quadrant Feasibility Study. Although the beltway route east of North Table Mountain would give greater relief to Wadsworth traffic than the route through Golden, neither beltway alignment would reduce future congestion in north Jeffco as well as improving the arterials. Even though they want the beltway, Arvada ruled out the eastern alignment absolutely.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Gov. Ritter’s executive order

Joe Felice of Aurora writes:

Why are you Republicans making such a fuss about Governor Ritter’s executive order extending collective-bargaining rights to state employees? Why are you so opposed to anything that benefits the working class? Relax, Chicken Little. The sky is not falling. (It did that when you took away no-fault insurance.) Governors issue executive orders all the time. I don’t recall the Democrats’ ever having such a tantrum over any of Bill Owens’ orders. The last time anybody made such a ruckus was in 1975, when Gov. Dick Lamm issued an executive order banning discrimination against gay people in the state personnel system. You thought the sky was falling then, too. To paraphrase a popular television commercial, “Y’all need to get eyeball to eyeball over the things that bring people together.” In other words, sit down, discuss your differences, and try to reach an amicable solution, just like ordinary people have to do all the time. And quit being so divisive.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

New energy bill

Robert Lipton of Lakewood writes:

A new energy bill, hooray for congress , the bill will do nothing to ease the energy shortage which is crippling the American economy. The pie in the sky promises of bio -fuels etc. hustled to the charlatans in congress will not lower the prices or ease the shortage . If we had drilled in Anwar as proposed ten years ago or at least opened some of the off shore prospects we would now not be totally dependent on foreign oil. The promise of alleviating this crisis sometime in the next 40 years is ridiculous. The economy needs help now . The dollar is no longer a stable currency. Promises of a rosy, environmentally neat future are grand but without a sustainable economy we never going to attain it.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

FutureGen Project mischaracterized

Michael J. Mudd Chief Executive Officer FutureGen Alliance of Washington DC writes:

To the Editor: Kevin R. Collins recent column, “The path to affordable energy security,” (11/7/2007), correctly recognizes the importance of coal, and that carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) is the leading technological option for addressing climate change concerns associated with coal. However, he mischaracterizes the FutureGen project, which is developing the very technology he argues is so important.
FutureGen is not just a government program; it is a public-private partnership with 12 companies contributing nearly $400 million to build this first-of-its-kind coal-fueled power plant with near-zero emissions that will produce hydrogen and capture and permanently store carbon dioxide deep underground. The cancellation of Xcel’s IGCC plant, along with other IGCC plants recently, demonstrates that private/public partnerships such as FutureGen are critical to proving IGCC with CCS can work.The project is being designed so that it will have global transferability to help accelerate its adoption.
The FutureGen Alliance agrees that coal is a critical component of our energy future and FutureGen will ensure that coal can be used while addressing climate change concerns. Four sites in Texas and Illinois are being considered for siting FutureGen, and the Alliance is on track to announce the finalist site by the end of this year. Whether the plant winds up in Texas or Illinois, the real beneficiaries of the project will be future generations who will have cleaner and affordable electricity from coal.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Torture should not be allowed

Leroy Quet of Denver writes:

There are several reasons why torture should not be allowed to be carried out by America as part of the so-called War On Terror.
First, torture is ineffective as a tool for getting accurate information.
Torture victims (and they ARE VICTIMS) tell their interrogators whatever they think those interrogators want to hear.
Second, many of those the US has tortured or has sent to other countries to be tortured are COMPLETELY INNOCENT. Many — if not most, if not almost all — of those tortured by the United States have indeed turned out to not be terrorists or to have any knowlege of terrorist operations.
And, oh yeah, those that are innocent are likely to be tortured MORE, since they do not have the right answers to satisfy their interrogators.
Third, America’s use of torture gives a huge propaganda victory to America’s enemies.
Fourth, allowing the use of torture sets a precedent which will likely lead to US soldiers being tortured by the enemy.
And fifth, most importantly, torture is WRONG and torture is EVIL, even when it is carried out against people who are truly guilty, let alone when it is used against possibly innocent people, many of which have never had a proper trial and often have not even had charges filed against them.
It is safe to say that those who torture are monsters, plain and simple.
And those that even support torture politically are guilty of inhumanity at best.
America USED to be dedicated, as it should have been, to outlawing torture around the world. I cannot believe we have sunk so low as to allow one of the most vile of human acts that can be carried out against another person to be done in our names.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (45) | TrackBack

November 13, 2007
Gov. Ritter’s executive order

Tom Cassidy, no hometown provided, writes:

I am extremely disappointed in the state employee partnership executive order and the negative effects it will have on our great state for years to come.
Governor Ritter’s campaign promises quite obviously changed dependant on his audience, I recall Ritter speaking fiscally moderate and pro business to voters while apparently negotiating behind closed doors with union leaders while he accepted their campaign donations. His decision and the manner with which it was executed were clearly designed to fulfill his union promises and circumvent the legislature from debating it. In doing so, he has completely ignored the voters who depend on the legislature to be their voice.
In a time of precarious economic standing, mortgage woes, rising gas prices and shaky consumer confidence, his act has guaranteed taxes will go up and the business climate and the citizens of Colorado will suffer. Short sighted and self serving politics at its worst!
The Governor’s executive order will certainly be at the forefront of my decision making when voting on all matters that are remotely aligned with his office and his party’s agenda in the future. I encourage all voters to do the same.
In nearly every political campaign I can recall, a common card foes play is their opponent bowing to special interest groups, should Governor Ritter choose to run for re-election, in his case it will clearly be true.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (15) | TrackBack

Climate change

Robert Lipton of Lakewood writes:

Governor Ritter is going to save us from climate change by reducing Colorado co2 emissions while coal use in Europe is increasing by 72% due to the high price of oil, and China and India will build over 1000 new coal burning electricity plants in the next five years. Good Luck, holding back the tide Governor.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Paul Campos

Bruce Vanderbrook of Lakewood writes:

Paul Campos’ article “An Outdated Constitution” reads like the normal liberal line we’ve come to expect. He takes Sandy Levinson’s book “Our Undemocratic Constitution” and appears to agree with large parts of it. He complains about the senator from Wyoming haveing the same power as the senator from California has while the California senator represents 70 times as many people. But he neglects to mention that California has the representatives in the House to even out this disparity. This was done on purpose for the very reason that otherwise, the populous states would wield all the power and states like Wyoming wouldn’t count.
The fact that both houses of Congress have to agree in order for a bill to become law again removes the possibility that three or four very large population states could rule the country - a wisely chosen safeguard.
He complains that Constitution gives one person, the president, the power to veto legislation for any reason he likes, but neglects to mention that congress can overide that veto with a 66% vote, another safeguard our founding fathers were wise enough to include.
He says we have no way to get rid of an incompetent president - did he forget the procedure to impeach a president? Its not that long ago that it was tried.
I believe most thinking people will treat this type of political garbage for what it is and let it end up in the proper container.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Global warming

Gerald McGonigle of Colorado Springs writes:

Most discussions about global warming tend to ignore the elephant in the room – our planet’s rampant population growth. Earth’s population is over 6.6 billion. When I graduated from high school in 1955, the number was less than 3 billion. Currently there are about 2.3 births for every death in the world, resulting in population growth of about 80 million per year. This imbalance continues to worsen as mankind works feverishly to prolong life and overcome starvation and disease.
Man’s impact on our planet goes well beyond the problem of global warming.
Forests and open space are disappearing at an alarming rate. The abundance of fish that our oceans once contained has been dangerously diminished.
Natural resources are being consumed wantonly. Clean water supplies around the world are inadequate. Species of flora and fauna are disappearing every year.
No matter how noble the intent, worrying about each person’s carbon footprint without also focusing on the increasing numbers of people leaving those footprints is insane. Opening discussions on how to “manage” population is extremely unpopular in this age of sensitivity and political correctness. However, sticking our heads in the sand and hoping that the problem goes away is absurd. Nature and the laws of human behavior will eventually resolve the problem of over-population as need outstrips available resources. But, waiting for this natural solution will doom the world to a future of increasing human suffering, conflict, and war.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (36) | TrackBack

Glad marijuana question passed

Brian Quade of Denver writes:

I am glad that Denver voters have made marijuana enforcement the lowest priority for Denver police. The issue was never about winning the right to use marijuana; it was always about removing the burden on our police to arrest people for it. Democracy has prevailed in Denver. This country is slowly taking baby steps toward rational centrist policies, after decades of hate-based initiatives and a culture of intolerance and extremism. Denver residents are safer as a result of this election.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (37) | TrackBack

Another botched election

Leroy M Martinez of Denver writes:

Well, well, well. Another botch election in Denver. I wonder how much the taxpayer pay for SWAT teams to come in and count election mail in ballots. Why did they not leave the electronic machines that were in the first place along with the poll places that were only two blocks away from my home. I say get rid of everyone that is involved in the Denver elections and start all over. P.S. this am on 11/07/2007 I still do not have all of the results of the elections.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Global climate change & red meat

Alan Thomas of Denver writes:

In respect to global climate change, letter writer Sam Holden goes right along with the liberal environmentalist crowd in that they all make one great big assumption before they begin to spout their agenda. That assumption is that there is actually a problem out there that the human race has any influence over. The supposed ‘science’ they cite is, from what I’ve seen, mostly based on computer models. As another letter writer (Scientist misuses science in argument, Richard Postma) points out, computer models are not science and don’t ‘prove’ anything. While I’m sure that models are a useful tool they can be made to show anything the designer wishes and are only as good as the data input into them to create a guess at the future. As far as I’m aware, the only true ‘scientific’ data available that has a chance of accounting for the millions of years of climate history for which we have no written record comes from polar ice cores, fossil records, etc. All the evidence thus obtained points to many climate changes having occurred naturally in the past. So where has the baseline data which causes the models to conclude that current climate change is unusual and man-made come from?
Mr. Holden also makes reference to red meat and the idea that if “science demands that Americans reduce their hefty consumption of red meat a little, so be it” Well, Mr Holden, it is NOT just “so be it". If I want to eat red meat for every meal of every day of MY life and can afford to buy it, that should be MY choice! I don’t need some nannyist government agency, or special interest group telling me what I can and cannot eat. I think the various bans on transfat have already gone too far.
What about foreign countries? Is red meat to be rationed there, too? Don’t force your agenda on the rest of us.
Now, if Mr. Holden’s concern over red meat is the supposed greenhouse gas emissions of cows, this is the height of hypocrisy. What about all the human greenhouse gas emissions? While cows are bigger, there are a lot more people.
If climate change, despite lack of any real evidence, is actually man-made then it seems to me the real solution is to reduce the earth’s human population, not force inconvenience, restrictions, and expense on the people of the one nation in the world which is supposed to stand for liberty and freedom of choice. But I haven’t heard any of the global warming alarmists suggesting a plan to control population growth, or volunteering to not have kids themselves. Don’t expect to either.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Gov. Ritter’s climate action plan

Gary Hart of Kittredge writes:

To the Editor: In “Clearing the Air,” Mr. Vincent Carroll criticizes Gov. Ritter’s climate action plan as requiring “massive subsidies” and “forced transformation.”
As Americans, we have considerable experience with both. For example, the space program and our continuing defense needs. Both involve massive subsidies and a host of “incentives” to do what the nation has decided needs to be done. Arguably, we didn’t have to go to the moon, or anywhere else in space for that matter. But, as a nation, we chose to. Many of us, most importantly a large majority of climate scientists, are convinced that we have no choice but to address climate degradation. Recently, a dozen or so senior military flag officers reported that climate change was now a national security threat. For my money, that takes it out of the category of “let’s continue to sweep it under the rug” as the Carrolls of the world seem to propose.
Pursuing Mr. Carroll’s dubious logic, why not turn over national security to the market place. Thus, our defense would “unfold without prodding,” etc. No, there are certain things, things vital to the Commonwealth of America, that markets do not naturally produce.
National security is one. A clean and healthy environment is another.
And energy security, independence from unstable Persian Gulf oil supplies, is yet another.
Mr. Carroll fails to admit that our current energy, and therefore climate, policy is heavily subsidized, and I thought by now all thoughtful Americans had accepted that. Oil is subsidized. Coal is subsidized. Our air and our water are not free goods. Yet we are treating them as if they were. So much for “markets.” Nuclear is heavily subsidized. The greatest subsidy for oil is our military presence in the Persian Gulf. Include that cost into the cost of imported oil and we would all be paying about $7 a gallon for gasoline.
And that, of course, does not include the incalculable cost of human lives. Our casualties in Gulf War II now well exceed 30,000.
Markets are wonderful for regulating all human activities that generate a profit. But the profit generated by climate change will emerge when Florida is under water. The preamble to our Constituti