January 8, 2008 10:39 AM
Were Clinton's tears real and will they help or hurt her campaign?
Rocky columnist Mike Littwin says Hillary Clinton's choke-up moment at a New Hampshire cafe may be just what her campaign needs:
If you missed it - a little confession here: your ace correspondent didn't catch up with Clinton until her next event - the video shows her sitting with a group of undecided voters. When one asked how she does it day after day, Clinton began to answer and then choked up. She began this way: "It's not easy, and I couldn't do it if I didn't passionately believe it was the right thing to do. You know, I have so many opportunities from this country, I just don't want to see us fall backwards."And then, with her voice catching: "You know, this is very personal for me. It's not just political. It's not just public. I see what's happening, and we have to reverse it."
Since Clinton is a candidate who requires a special effort to show her soft side on the campaign trail, this was not exactly expected. On the other hand, it wasn't exactly expected that her campaign, on the eve of the New Hampshire primary, would be in danger of imploding. The latest polls show her trailing Barack Obama by an astounding 10 points. What former front-runner - See: Mitt "Don't Touch the Hair" Romney, who had his own teary moment recently - wouldn't be tempted to weep?
Doug Thompson has a different take on Capitol Hill Blue:
Hillary Rodham Clinton cried on cue Monday, choking up in a contrived show of so-called emotion so unbelievable that even long-time supporters looked on in surprise.One can only imagine that her note cards for the event contained detailed instructions on how to cry on camera. And here she was, attempting to show actual emotion but showing instead just how uncomfortable it can be to try and act human when doing so is just not in your nature.
Few bought the act. Anyone with an IQ over that of a two-minute egg knows Hillary Clinton is in trouble going into today’s New Hampshire primary, trailing the surging Barack Obama, struggling to stay afloat in a sea of change.
That situation might drive an ordinary person to tears but Clinton is no ordinary person or candidate and she has spent a career building the image of a stoic, always-in-control, hard-nosed politician who can take anything in stride and rise above it.
Sorry Hillary. We ain’t buying the crocodile tears. We know your handlers brought in a professional tear trainer to coach you on how to emote emotion on cue. You might want to fire the tear trainer. He didn’t get the job done.
M.E. Sprengelmeyer e-mailed a note about how far Clinton's "market value" has fallen.
Was Clinton's choke-up moment real or scripted? Will it help or hurt her campaign?
January 8, 2008
11:10 AM
Tree writes:
This is the $60K question.
We'll find out real quick. Maybe if she was getting all choked up with Oprah sitting beside her. Doooooh. "could of had a V8"
I really don't think it matters, I believe Hillary's 15 minutes of TMZ are up and her #'s prove it.
Her days are numbered at Faber College! She's on double secret probation.
However, don't take my advise, I picked the bald guy with the big voice to win American Idol last year and he went out in the wild card round.
January 8, 2008
11:17 AM
jay writes:
American Idol is about right, Tree...oh how our political discourse has devolved. At least it's entertaining to watch the far right wingnuts pile on this issue like so many Rushian footsoldiers.
January 8, 2008
11:18 AM
gr8fuldude writes:
Tree - I think they were real, because I think deep down she is a True Believer. That is NOT to say she is right, just that she believes she is.
That said, I also don't think there would be a perceived value in faking tears - It could be seen as all too big a sign of weakness. While it could also be seen as a sign of sincerity, I think the percception of weakness outweighs any benefit.
I think it will be Obama in November, as I think the voter wants new blood, and Hill represents more of the status quo. "She can't handle the truth"!
January 8, 2008
11:26 AM
Rich Jewels writes:
Was Clinton's choke-up moment real or scripted?
I think the choke up was real. But not because she believes in the future of our country. (Remember she went along with the Iraq invasion... didn't run when Dem leadership needed her in 2004 either)
she is choking up because she is LOSING. She can't figure out why things are going like they calculated things would turn out. The plan was not to run in 2004 but to run in 2008. Meanwhile she voted for the war and supported the republican view until she ran this year.
no one believes the Clintons.
January 8, 2008
11:28 AM
Tree writes:
8dude, I'm real careful about woman and tears. I just worked with a a professional liar. She would cry once a week like clockwork on the phone to get her way with someone somehow since she was ful of BS. Then she would walk out of her office laughing, "it worked again". This is the same bitch who drove 20 over on every road, every highway, everyday and kept an empty inhaler in her glove box. When pulled over she would be crying and inhaling (air) and state she can't breath and she's going to the hospital. I hate to type this.....and it worked.
Got to run to Vail, enjoy your day.
January 8, 2008
11:41 AM
Anonymous writes:
Plenty of voters believe the Clintons--and in the long run, Hillary will win. Trouble is, you never see any unflattering photos or hear much about male candidates appearing and acting in pretty unflattering ways. Why? It's the MEDIA, silly! We NEED the Clintons more than ever, with a near-certain DEPRESSION--not just recession coming on thanks to Dubya's overspending and Revenge on Iraq and Saddam Hussein for trying to kill da-da.
January 8, 2008
11:57 AM
Shaggy writes:
11:41 AM,
Are you one of those chicken littles who bought into Algores scam of the sky is falling?
Silly liberals, The white house is for the GOP...
January 8, 2008
12:18 PM
Anonymous writes:
Hillary's trying to use photo-ops and sad stories to achieve sympathy from the public.
She's trying to copy the same sad tactics that the GOP employed in the days and weeks following 9/11.
January 8, 2008
12:49 PM
JW writes:
"I think it will be Obama in November, as I think the voter wants new blood, and Hill represents more of the status quo. "She can't handle the truth"!"
Jeez. Do any of you ever turn a critical eye on what the media spews? I mean, Ive seen this crap stated again and again. Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton, we dont want this! We want CHANGE! WTF? You want ANY change? Just any kind of change whatsoever? Or would you like GOOD change?
As to the status quo...seems like if that is a big issue to you, maybe Clinton should be your choice.
We had Reagan run up tons of debt and create a credit crunch leading to a recession (he killed the USSR this way, so Im not dissing the man. In his case it was necessary). Bush 1 started trying to fix it, and then Clinton came along and fixed it (and some of the way he did that was to keep the fiscally responsible policies of Bush 1). Then Bush 2 comes along and pulls a Reagan, but worse, and without the USSR as a good reason.
Seems to me, the "Change" represented by Clinton is EXACTLY whats called for.
As I said on the other blog, Obama will probably be ok. Im just worried about the guy screwing up free trade. And while he wraps "Protect American manufacturing jobs" in the prettiest bow available (he says we do it by ramping up green tech manufacturing), its still POPULISM. And Populism is a proven failure. I'll still vote for the guy over anyone in the Republican party because they either mix religious fanaticism with populism, or they want to stay in Iraq for freaking ever...but that populist streak from Obama freaks me out. And when you look at actual policies, thats really the only difference between Obama and Hillary that matters. He may be younger and newer, but their policies are the exact same accept that Clinton has less populist ideas about trade and jobs.
As for whether her tears were real or not, they probably were. If you hate Clinton though, its another great chance to show your hypocrisy. "Shes a cast iron bitch" is now "Shes weak". Pathetic political sideshow.
January 8, 2008
12:57 PM
Bill writes:
Hillary has no experience at managing anything but the White House waite staff. She has no real agenda or good plan. We are tired of the Clinton's saga and this will become evident very soon. We all love our country - Ms. Clinton just hates Bush and that is the only reason she is running.
January 8, 2008
1:03 PM
Bill writes:
By the Way JW, The reason 911 happened is BECAUSE of Bill Clinton, and then the economy tanked. Get it straight please. He did nothing to twart terrorism. (but he did play a good sax and had a lot of women - good for him).
January 8, 2008
1:06 PM
JW writes:
"Ms. Clinton just hates Bush and that is the only reason she is running. "
"By the Way JW, The reason 911 happened is BECAUSE of Bill Clinton, and then the economy tanked. Get it straight please. He did nothing to twart terrorism. "
You just hate the Clinton's, and thats the only reason your spewing this ignorant crap. You wouldnt know an economic policy if I beat you with it.
January 8, 2008
1:29 PM
history buff writes:
It looks like the tears were real. She was caught at an unguarded moment. Showing vulnerability works for characters in the movies, and it has historical precedent. Richard Nixon of all people, perhaps the most cynical and impersonal American politician of the twentieth century, used vulnerability in his Checker's speech. Look what's going on with Romney. He is perceived as a cold businessman who can't connect with ordinary people. Maybe he should cry. (But I will also add that it hurt Ed Muskie in 1972. After Nixon's degenerates libled his wife and caused him to get upset, Tricky Dick and his band of a$$holes then used attack ads showing Muskie falling to the presssure.)
Even if Hill loses in NH and SC, she is not out of it. Her money and organization still can carry her through super Tuesday. But Romney may not recover if he loses because Rudy is going to do well on super Tuesday. McCain may be the alternative, and I'm not sure how Huck is going to do when money and organization matter.
January 8, 2008
2:04 PM
Scott writes:
Rich Jewels: Your observation is exactly what Dick Morris said last night (7 January). He said that after Clinton lost her push for socialist medicine she broke down wonder why congress did not immediately want to follow her lead. So according to Morris, the tears were real because she just can't understand why dem voters are ditching her.
Pretty pathetic ego problem. (my comment)
Scott
January 8, 2008
2:10 PM
Vinadetta writes:
I think that Kleenex should be Hillary's biggest Sponsor!!!!
I can see the ads now
January 8, 2008
2:28 PM
DR writes:
I guess I should have known this would be a hot potato of a topic.
For what it's worth, here is what I think; I think Hillary, in all honesty, meant exactly what she said - "You know, this is very personal for me. It's not just political. It's not just public. I see what's happening, and we have to reverse it."
There was a popular question asked in one of the past Presidential campaigns, and I don't recall who used it. But, it was "Ask yourself if you are better off now than you were 4 years ago."
If everyone here asked themselves "Am I better off now than I was seven years ago?", I would be pretty surprised if many would answer "Yes". And if we broaden the question to include our family, friends, neighbors, co-workers, and our nation, perhaps the answer would be even more revealing.
Something to think about when contemplating who should receive your vote, and just how sincere they really are in all that they say while wooing your vote, but wouldn't most of us say that the course we're on needs to be reversed, or at least a new heading taken?
January 8, 2008
3:26 PM
Hogar De Vuelta (العودة) writes:
I think they were genuine tears coming from a fake person. Hillary is sad that "her children" have rejected her. It was her turn and she knows she will never have another. She has spent her entire life whittling her communistic ideals to fit the times and now she knows she has missed the boat. It is ironic that what was to be her hour, she is now too conservative for her party.
January 8, 2008
3:46 PM
am 760 writes:
This is what creates terrorist and why certain Muslims hate us. Its not because our freedom and its not Bill Clintons fault.
We keep sticking our noses where they don't belong and keep trying to take over other countries resources and implement what we think is right. Pathetic!
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/01/08/6256
And this should put to rest that there is some liberal media bias. Hog, its your right wing media who is serving as the Pravada. Go figure, you were wrong again and still don't get it.
January 8, 2008
3:58 PM
Anonymous writes:
JW, don't freak out over this populism stuff. Everything will be okay whether its Obama or Edwards. Im sure you will still get your 6 figure job w/ your MBA and do well. They are just trying to connect w/ people in the middle and elsewhere who are sick of the muti-corporations and rich ruling our lifes and putting profits before the people. I seriously doubt, economically, much will change.
They may be fined more for polluting and breaking other laws but thats about it. They have too much power and money to let someone come in and take away their gravy train. But at least these 2 are talking about trying to rein them in a little.
January 8, 2008
3:59 PM
Anonymous writes:
Once again AM 760 opens his mouth and proves what a douchebag he is. Learn your history you moron. They hate us for discovereing oil in 1933 and importing western things and values into a country (Saudi) that wanted Whabbi islam, or to turn the clock back. Its been going ever since jackass.
Its funny, you claim all right wingers are brain washed, but you are the apitimy of a brainwashed, partisian stooge. You only read far left shit, conspiracy shit, and the link posted is a link that carrys no merit as it was written by some dipshit like yourself that fails to know history but posts his opinions as fact. Get a clue already dude, the world is full enough of complete douches that cant tie their own shoes.
January 8, 2008
4:16 PM
Anonymous writes:
3:59 your so nice. Did your repub/Christian family raise you that way. Well done.
Yes they hate us because we have been importing western things and values into a country/religion that dispises our superficial culture.
Their religion is more important than profit. Very different from our culture. Kind of like the Native Americans. Muslims saw what we did to their culture and don't what the same to happen to them. Those bastards, trying to save their culture and way of life, whats wrong with them.
Anyway, 3:59, hope your blood pressure has returned to normal. Man, your in need of some counseling for that anger.
BTW, whats wrong w/ that site, commondreams. Ray McGovern a long time republican has had many articles posted there along w/ many other respected and educated people from both sides of the isle and all walks of life. Just because you read something you don't like doesn't make it less true.
On 2nd thought, why Im I even bothering. It's like talking to a child who gets all emotional when he doesn't get his way.
Get some counseling dude before you snap.
And really, try to remember Jesus' words, Love thy neighbor.
Now go take your Ativan and settle down, everything will be okay.
January 8, 2008
4:31 PM
Steve writes:
It still slays me that most people are still caught up in the Dem v. Rep, Dem v. Dem ect stuff. Is there really a substantial differance? The question should not be are we better off now then four years ago? or seven years ago? the question should be; How much better off could we be if we elected someone who is not part of the "go to law school, have a politacl career, have big ego and deep pockets and run for pres routine. Even the most die hard party line stooges have to admit that even if we could elect a Pres who was an independent thinker and truly had this countries best interest at heart; this person would be a lame duck becuase the congress/senate and big money would not let the true and neccessary changes to be made. We will continue to have the same cycle of crap under the current system perhaps only packaged slightly different. Does anyone really believe the Dems or Reps are actually going to solve any big problems? We all need to start demanding better representation at all levels of gvmt and have the courage to not just vote for the lesser of two evils or vote for the person and not that one becuase the we think a third party or unpopular candidate can't win.
January 8, 2008
4:39 PM
Geof writes:
Hillary has 10 times the sincerity, intelligence and capacity that George W. Bush could muster on his best day (that being 9/11, apparently), and the conservative mutts here couldn't care less, even though he's in the Oval office and Hillary is NOT. Always the false outrage, even at things and people who have done nothing to them, for the Republican mind is full of fear and will stab at anything it feels is a threat. Your day is done, because rational people have had enough of you for a long, long time.
No Osama
Not out of Iraq
Afghanistan crumbling
Pakistan in crisis
Home loan crisis
Katrina death toll
National debt still a record
Oil crisis
Divided nation
Rich get richer
Middle class poorer
Record credit card debt
Record loan defaults
Detroit crumbling
Outsourcing
Health care crumbling
Aggressive Russia and China on the rise
Global warming ignored
Endless list of GOP hypocrisy and crime
Complete lack of leadership and credibility
Wow, that's quite a legacy, yet somehow nobody can run things better than George. My insincere thanks, GOP's, for running the country straight into the ground with your self-serving, bible-thumping, gun-toting agendas.
WMD anyone?
Go Hills, go Obama, go Edwards.
January 8, 2008
4:56 PM
jay writes:
Great points, Steve, but without meaningful campaign finance reform...your thoughts are just pipe dreams.
January 8, 2008
8:46 PM
Shaggy writes:
"We all need to start demanding better representation at all levels of gvmt "---Steve
We could start with term limits for those old farts on the hill that have been there longer than Bill has been a philanderer.
January 9, 2008
10:49 AM
Hogar De Vuelta (العودة) writes:
Our real problem is the level of fraud being committed with regard to the polls.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=VSYiUAaBd1U&feature=related
January 9, 2008
12:40 PM
Hogar De Vuelta (العودة) writes:
Shooby Doo Wop Wop Wop
Shooby Doo Wop Wop Wop
Shooby Doo Wop Wop Wop
My Heart Is cryin',cryin'
Lonely Teardrops
My pillows never dry off
Lonely Teardrops
Come Home, Come Home
Just Say You Will, Say You Will (Say You Will)
Say You Will (Say You WIll)
Hey, Hey (Say You Will)
My Heart Is Fine, Fine
Lonely Teardrops
My pillows never dry off
Lonely Teardrops
Come Home, Come Home
Just Say You Will, Say You Will (Say You Will)
Say You Will (Say You WIll)
Hey, Hey (Say You Will)
Just Give Me Another Chance
For our Romance
Come On And Tell Me
That One Day You'll Return
Cause Everyday That You've Been Gone Away
You'll Know Why My Heart Does Nothing But Burn
[Crying]
Lonely Teardrops
My pillows never dry off
Lonely Teardrops
Come Home, Come Home
Just Say You Will, Say You Will (Say You Will)
Say You Will (Say You Will)
Hey, Hey (Say You Will)
Say It Right Now Baby (Say You Will)
Come On, Come On (Say You Will)
Say It Darling Yeah! (Say You Will
January 9, 2008
2:12 PM
Matt writes:
No Osama - Isn't the fact that there's been "No Terrorism" more relevant? Glass is half empty right? Bill Clinton intentionally turned him down more than once.
Not out of Iraq - Exactly what the terrorists have been telling us. Despite being at war under Bush, we lost fewer military members during the peacetime of Bill Clinton's military. Congressional Report: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf Not that each isn't an important loss to somebody but I'd like to point out that losses of our most precious resource in the military, people, are likely to be the same or even worse if we weren't in Iraq.
Afghanistan crumbling - When wasn't it? But hey, it's a chance to pin something on somebody you don't like so why not, right? (Every little bit helps when you need to verify what you want to believe)
Pakistan in crisis - See "Afghanistan crumbling".
Home loan crisis - Because ill informed or stupid people took loans from other ill informed or stupid people then everybody should bail both sides out = the liberal mantra. Being screwed after being stupid is supposed to be the incentive to not be stupid.
Katrina death toll - As if there was no local responsibility. As if Bush steered Katrina into N.O. by remote control and blew up the levies, never mind that every single other local hit by Katrina came out in way better shape with the same George Bush as president.
National debt still a record - true.
Oil crisis - Chirped the Democrat as he simultaneously opposes drilling almost anywhere.
Divided nation - Politically speaking, always has been, its one of our strengths. Liberals always preach diversity favorably until it comes to the philosophical type.
Rich get richer - another liberal cliché which forgets that the lazy usually ignore opportunity.
Middle class poorer - illegal immigration, business friendly republicans and enabling liberals are both to blame.
Record credit card debt - see "Home loan crisis"
Record loan defaults - see "Home loan crisis"
Detroit crumbling - Results of years of liberal/socialist control. Who was the last conservative Mayor? This is what socialist/victimhood policies result in when your city doesn't have a beautiful coastline like San Francisco or a worthy Tourist attraction.
Outsourcing - true.
Health care crumbling - Not true. Most uninsured are the lazy, the young and the illegals. People come to America from all over the world to take advantage of our system. Affordable health insurance starts at around $130/month, a quarter of weed is about $100, I've seen a lot of stoned hippies in my day….hmmm.
Aggressive Russia and China on the rise - true.
Global warming ignored - Manbearpig the essence of the lemming minded Democrat.
Endless list of GOP hypocrisy and crime - Abundant on the Democratic side of the isle as well
Complete lack of leadership and credibility - A year of Democratic control of Congress has produced a 10-year low in the public approval rating for the national legislature but it didn't stop them from voting themselves a pay raise - http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gYSdLbi7TlGf-wTrMfI0LGQXUweAD8U2IDE00
January 9, 2008
2:23 PM
Hogar De Vuelta (العودة) writes:
Matt,
We thank you for your careful and thoughtful response.
Annoy a Liberal - Work Hard, Succeed, Be Happy.
http://www.cafepress.com/annoy_a_liberal
January 9, 2008
2:48 PM
Roy Orbison writes:
I was alright for a while,
I could smile for a while.
But when I saw you last night,
you held my hand so tight
as you stopped to say hello.
And though you wished me well,
you couldn't tell that I'd been
crying over you, crying over you -
yes you said so long, and left me standing all alone,
alone and crying.
I thought that I was over you,
but it's true, so true.
I love you even more
than I did before,
but darling, what can I do?
Oh, you don't love me,
and I'll always be
crying over you, crying over you,
yes, now you're gone, and from this moment on,
I'll be crying, crying, crying, crying
over you.
January 9, 2008
5:23 PM
CT writes:
Matt, please stop making sense, or you'll confuse the sh*t out of them, and some of them will fall and get hurt
January 9, 2008
6:49 PM
Shaggy writes:
Kudos to you Matt.
Couldn't have said it better myself:)
January 9, 2008
9:50 PM
Doodlebug writes:
The immediate response to Hills choke up was a vid of Romney recalling a tragic event in his past. Libs wanted to put this on par with hills breakdown trying to say that there should not be a double standard.
Problem was hill was boo-hooing losing a political contest. It is not the same thing.
World leaders will not buy the crocodile tears from such a manipulative wench.
January 10, 2008
8:35 AM
Anonymous writes:
Clinton (DEMOCRAT) went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent.
Bosnia never attacked us.
He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on
multiple occasions.
In the years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled
al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Libya, Iran, and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who
slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. And the Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking.
It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno (DEMOCRAT)
to take the Branch Davidian compound.
That was a 51-day operation..
We've been looking for evidence for chemical weapons in Iraq for less time than it took Hillary Clinton (DEMOCRAT) to find
the Rose Law Firm billing records.
It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard
than it took Ted Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick.
January 10, 2008
10:20 AM
Anonymous writes:
And where are those WMD's.
And where is Osama?
Where is the surplus we had before bush and co. distributed it to his war profittering cronies.
Matt keep closing your eyes to reality and all is great right.
January 10, 2008
1:07 PM
Holier Than Thou writes:
What a bunch of sensitive new-age boys we have here!
When their man gets verklempt, that's OK. He's being sensitive and vulnerable.
When a woman sheds a tear, they say she's faking it or being weak.
A man can yell at, bully, hurt and even kill people. That makes him a big hero.
If a woman is assertive and makes a logical argument that they don't like, they call her a beach.
Gentlemen, where ever you are. Please, join me in a campaign to punch the lights out of unmanly men who insult women for being women. Even if, sadly enough, we only get to do it in print.
Hillary, if you want shed a tear then be my guest. One look at what has happened to our country since your husband left office is enough to make the most steely-eyed strongman in America start bawling.
January 10, 2008
2:29 PM
Shaggy writes:
"since your husband left office is enough to make the most steely-eyed strongman in America start bawling."
That is amazing you think so highly of Bill and yet he treated women more disrespectful than anyone I know.
Should I mention what a lousy influence he was as a father?
Should I mention what a lousy husband he is/was?
Infidelity should not be idolized.
Ask Chelsea what a hero she thinks of her womanizing father, don't you think she was embarrassed to see him on National T.V. describing his BJ in the oral office and the stain on Monicas dress after denying it to the whole world??
Bill Clinton is nothing but scum and Hillarys greed is the ONLY reason she is with him.
The two are so phony yet it seems that the more vile and repugnant they become the more you on the left coddle them.
January 10, 2008
4:42 PM
Anonymous writes:
I don't think Chelsea got pulled over for drunk driving or running around half naked while on vacation in Mexico.
Yeah those bush girls are fine upstanding gals, you betcha.
Bbbbbbbut......Clinton, get over it.
January 10, 2008
10:44 PM
Yogi writes:
Matt, shouldn't that be "aisle"? It's not as if Democrats live on the other side of a small island.
January 11, 2008
9:23 AM
Mickey writes:
Nothing unusual what Hilly did. Most people recognize the tears of a woman who desperately wants something. In this respect she is like most other women in the US.
January 11, 2008
1:56 PM
Anonymous writes:
Mickey,
Do you think her crying will help her when she needs to confront the terrorists?
"ohhhhh, please Bin Laden, boo hoohoo, don't attack us anymore, snif snif"--Hillary
Hmm Doesn't make us sound like the greatest Country in the World.
January 11, 2008
4:12 PM
Mickey writes:
Actually I don't. My point is that Hill needs to taken at face value. Her "experience" does not amount to a hill of beans. As a carpetbagger into New York, her record for her constituents is meager, but then again those voters knew she was staging a run for the Big House.
She asks "Where's the Beef?" knowing full well that the beef is being stuffed into some intern or other low level employee while she takes a deep breath to pump out croc tears to rally the sheeple.
Sad.
January 11, 2008
4:40 PM
Matt writes:
Yea, I know Yogi. There are probably a few more grammatical mistakes in there than just that. BTW, thanks to Shaggy, Hogar and CT.
January 11, 2008
5:59 PM
Shaggy writes:
"Wheres the beef"
"its being stuff into an intern"--Mickey
OMFG, I just fell backwards, hit my head and broke my chair..lol lol
Can you just imagine how many spies Hillary would have tailing Bill at all times IF?
I'm off to office depot to get a new chair...and to find an ice pack:)
Have a good weekend all...