November 1, 2007 6:27 PM
Flavor of the day
View imagePhotos by M.E. Sprengelmeyer
If your town got as many presidential candidate visits as little Decorah, Iowa, does, you might need your own electronic sign to keep tabs of all the comings and goings, too.
On Thursday, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney became just the latest presidential contender to stop by Decorah, a college town within spitting distance of the Minnesota border.
All the top Democrats have been here this year. Republican Sen. John McCain is expected next week. And on Thursday, Romney drew several hundred people, including a contingent of liberal-leaning students that was, by happenstance, conspicuously sequestered behind a bank of television cameras on Romney's left flank.
They gave him a hard time with a smattering of boos, hisses and stern stares when he started talking about gay marriage and his support for a federal constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.
Still, even the curious Democrats in that crowd said afterwards that they were glad Romney came all this way -- a four-hour drive from Des Moines -- to let them get a look at him.
There's more -- MUCH MORE -- including Romney's lengthy statement about why he thinks all kids need a father and mother (even if they're divorced or one of them is dead).
So keep reading...
View image Photo by M.E. Sprengelmeyer
Romney launched a four-stop swing across northeastern and central Iowa on Thursday so he could trot out a new trade policy. (See the Associated Press story HERE.)
But since the Luther College visit was also one of his trademarked "Ask Mitt Anything" sessions, he got the usual batch of questions about abortion, health care, the "North American Union" and gay marriage.
Watch Friday morning's Rocky Mountain News for an analysis of one or two words he left out of his discussion of the latter topic.
Here's a partial transcript of what he said when asked what he would say to a gay couple that wants to get married:
"For those who are not familiar with it, of the four nationally leading candidates for president -- and I count myself as one of those, but also Mayor (Rudy) Giuliani, and Sen. (John) McCain and (former Sen.) Fred Thompson -- there's only one of us who's in favor of a federal amendment to the constitution to limit marriage to the relationship between a man and a woman. And that's me."
"I feel very strongly about this because, as I said earlier, I believe that maintaining the strength of the marriage relationship, the family relationship, is critical to the strength of an entire society."
"And I believe that the development of children is enhanced by having a male and a female as part of their upbringing in their home. Even when there's a divorce, you still have a mom and a dad. And even where one member of the partnership may pass away, the memory and the characteristics of that gender, of that partner influence the development of a child."
"I'm in favor of promoting, as a society, the marriage of men and women and the development of children in that kind of setting."
Romney got applause from parts of the audience in the part of the room to his right -- where the early-arriving, older folks had taken most of the good seats.
But his words didn't seem to please some of the students who arrived at the last minute and were forced to sit behind a row of television cameras to Romney's left.
Some booed -- quietly. Some hissed -- quietly. Riots are so much more polite in the Midwest.
An older man in the audience raised his hand to address students in the crowd, asking that they keep open minds about "candidates of both parties."
But afterwards, we could only find Democrats as we went looking for student reviews of Romney's speech.
* * *
Said Rachel Bruns, 18, who is studying Spanish and political science, and supports Sen. Barack Obama for president:
"I disagree with the same-sex marriage thing. I don't think there should be an amendment."
Still, she added:
"I think some students just appreciate that he's here and spent the time to talk to them."
* * *
Said Keeley Houlahan, 21, who's majoring in international studies and also supports Obama:
"In no way is it a waste of his time (speaking to students). I think it's great and I appreciated the opportunity to hear. This is the first Republican I've heard speak. He had a really friendly presence and a lot of things he said were very positive to me. (But) the moral issues: that's what turns me off."
* * *
Said Stephen Nilsen, 20, a math and statistics major who supports Sen. John Edwards:
"I really like that he thinks America should be 'Number one...' (Still,) it almost seems xenophobic to say we need to be 'Number one.' The sex-ed thing wasn't that bad."
(In response to a question, Romney criticized Obama (as he has in the past) for saying that some form of "age appropriate" sex education needs to be taught to children at a very young age. Romney had said: "In my opinion, the 'age-appropriate' sex-ed in kindergarten is NONE.")
* * *
Claire Tebbenhoff, 21, a political science and history major who supports Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, said she worried that college students wouldn't turn out for the scheduled Jan. 3, 2008, Iowa caucuses as they should.
"I don't think college kids are going to show up as much as candidates hope we will. It's important to come to the caucuses because we are the future. We're the ones who are going to control the next 50 years."
So watch out, grown-ups. They might sound quiet and polite right now, but...
TO BE CONTINUED





November 3, 2007
12:37 PM
Roni Bell writes:
genuine,
"Calm" was used as a deliberate understatement.
And as far as "occupation of a country" we also need to stop the European Union from occupying America.
What's your position on LOST?
November 3, 2007
12:28 PM
genuine ricardo writes:
butterburgers are nasty.
roni, you've got to be kidding when you write "[let's] get the war calmed down." a calmed down war? huh? this war/invasion should be ended asap. let's drop the fiction that "the regoin will collapse into chaos." the region is in chaos, largely due to US/UK/Israeli economic/military/political policies.
November 3, 2007
7:27 AM
Roni Bell writes:
Butterburger: A heap O grease.
Don't order their shrimp. It's so shrimpy you won't even find it.
November 3, 2007
7:04 AM
Christie Findlay writes:
what's a butterburger?
November 2, 2007
5:27 PM
Roni Bell writes:
Let's first get LOST stopped, the war calmed down, sell several million acres of federal land, get America back into resource production, implement fair trade, harness illegal immigration, bring in consumption tax, kick out income tax, repair infrastuctures like roads and bridges, rein in welfare to entities like The Nature Conservancy and reintroduce accountability, civility and manners to everyone.
If, after achieving all this we have time left to quibble and waste money over "emotional moral stuff," then so be it. Right now we don't have the luxury of time or money to do so.
From a financial basis, one should note the terrific families Mormans introduce into our society. Utah has historically been the lowest welfare state in the U.S., and I like that.
Bloggers, ask your candidate of choice what their position is on the beforementioned. Hold them to a non-patronizing answer, and post it here. Thank you.
November 2, 2007
5:11 PM
Richard writes:
I'm sick to death of these people telling us that we're just shit. Who gives them the right to judge me for who I am? They come along with all their religious crap draped all over them and spout off hatred that isn't always so veiled. And these are the same people who'll tell you how they love Jesus and blah, blah , blah. They don't have a clue about Jesus. Not a clue.
November 2, 2007
4:08 PM
genuine ricardo writes:
from the left, i concur with DSS.
November 2, 2007
2:01 PM
DSS writes:
I have said it before and I will say it again now and probably in the future. Marriage is not a matter that is within the powers of the federal government. It is an issue that has been, from day one, an issue within the individual states' jurisdiction. Mitt's urging that this matter be made a federal matter is either indicative that he has a poor understanding of our country's distribution of powers or he knows better and is simply pandering . Either way it is troubling. Mitt's urging that the federal government address this matter is no different than the view of Hill that the federal government is the answer to every problem. It is not. Too many times it is part of the problem.