Login | Contact Us | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic edition | Subscribe to the paper
Subscribe to RSS   Add to My Yahoo!

May 2, 2005 11:58 AM

Young Republicans brouhaha

The Denver Metro Young Republicans put out a press release making false allegations against a Rocky Mountain News reporter. Read the truth.

Here's the press release the Young Republicans put out last Wednesday, April 27.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Kopelman [mailto:dkopelman@technologist.com]On Behalf Of press@dmyr.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 4:18 PM
To: dkopelman@technologist.com
Subject: FOR IMMEDIATE Release - Denver Metro Young Republicans


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
"Denver Three" Member Harasses Young Republican Chair

Karen Bauer, one of three people removed from President Bush's Social Security meeting posed as a Rocky Mountain News journalist while grilling Jay Bob Klinkerman at a regular meeting of the Denver Metro Young Republicans. Klinkerman is chair of the Colorado Young Republicans, a group unaffiliated with the Denver Metro Young Republicans.

Ann Imse, staff writer for the Rocky Mountain News and photographer Evan Semon, escorted Bauer into the meeting.

"They were waiting in the restaurant area until our meeting began. They then joined our meeting in progress in a private room. They declined signing our guest form or to introduce themselves which is standard at our meetings," said Jude Sandvall, President of the Denver Metro Young Republicans.

It was only discovered after the harsh questioning of Klinkerman that Bauer was not a reporter and that she had shown up with Imse to intentionally confront the Young Republican chair.

"The sad thing is that we have enjoyed a great relationship with the press media in the past. Ann Imse's behavior is beyond our worst expectations in her attempt at deception. I'm truly disappointed with the Rocky Mountain News," concluded Sandvall.

The Denver Metro Young Republicans have been meeting at On the Border Cantina for more than 7 years on the 4th Tuesday every month at 6:30pm. They are independent from any State or National Young Republican organization and have been in continuous existence for more than 40 years in the Denver Metropolitan region.

Please direct all inquiries to press@dmyr.org

Now here's what really happened.

There was no harassment and there was no harsh questioning. Unless you consider "Can I ask you some questions?" and "What's the name of your lawyer?" a grilling. Imse and Bauer went to the meeting to talk to Klinkerman. They both introduced themselves to him immediately. Imse was not deceptive. To Imse's knowledge, Bauer was not deceptive. The entire encounter with Klinkerman was polite.

The Denver Metro Young Republicans are attacking the messenger instead of answering important questions. This is regrettable. The public deserves to know who was acting deceptively as a Secret Service agent to throw people out of a public meeting with the president of the United States. It would be one thing if the meeting had been a private, campaign event paid for by the GOP. But this meeting was paid for by the public, which flew the president to Denver for the meeting. The White House has said that if it thinks a person is going to be disruptive, it will kick that person out of a meeting with the president. A worthy question is how that policy is being administered. That's why the Rocky is asking questions. Can you imagine if it were the other way around, and a young Republican had been thrown out of a Clinton speech without having done anything?

Here's what happened in great detail:
Ever since the Secret Service said it was not one of their agents who removed Alex Young, Karen Bauer and Leslie Weise from the president's speech in Denver, the Rocky Mountain News has been trying to find out the identity of the man who did. As part of that effort, our reporter Ann Imse tried to figure out the identity of the other people involved, who might know the name of the man who appeared to be Secret Service but was not.

Bauer and Weise described being stopped at the gate by a man who checked their names against a piece of paper. He told them to stand to the side with a man wearing a smiley-face tie. They say that man told them that they were waiting for the Secret Service. Then the apparent agent appeared and threatened them with arrest. He allowed them in, then forced them out about 20-30 minutes later, though they had done nothing.

Imse first heard that Jay Bob Klinkerman might be the person in the smiley-face tie some weeks ago, thanks to a tip from another News reporter. She called him several times, knocked on his door, and called again. He called back and was very polite but refused to talk at all. He referred Imse to the Colorado Republican Party spokeswoman, Rachael Sunbarger, who also refused to talk about the incident.

We didn't publish anything because we didn't have any proof that Klinkerman was involved.

Later, Imse discovered that Klinkerman, rather than being the "flunky who volunteers for every Republican event" as he'd been described to her, was actually the chairman of the Colorado Young Republicans.

We decided we had only one way to prove whether Klinkerman was involved: One of the three had to identify him. So Imse called the three to see if they could go to this event, because there was a possibility the man who'd worn the smiley-face tie might attend.

Karen Bauer met News photographer Evan Semon and Imse at the On the Border Restaurant at 5:20 p.m. for the Young Republicans meeting. It was scheduled to start with a social hour at 5:30 p.m. and proceed to a meeting at 6:30 p.m. They sat outside so Bauer could try to pick out the man from the people entering.

Bauer didn't see anyone she recognized. However Klinkerman's pick-up was in the parking lot, so Imse decided to go interview him. Bauer decided she would go in separately and see if she could spot the man. Imse had not told Bauer Klinkerman's name.

Just as Imse walked into the room, Jude Sandvall, head of the local Young Republicans group, opened the meeting. Imse could not ask Klinkerman to go outside because she didn't know what he looked like. So she politely waited through the hour-long meeting.

The meeting had been publicly announced on the Internet, and visitors invited. Sandvall opened the meeting by welcoming guests. It was obviously a public meeting. Imse did not identify herself at the meeting, just as she wouldn't at any other public event. If they had asked everyone to stand up and introduce themselves, she would have done so.

Meanwhile, Bauer came in, sat down next to Imse and picked out the man from the group, which was about 25-30 people. She left before Imse.

After the meeting, several people came up and introduced themselves and asked Imse her name. She gave them her name only and said she was waiting to speak with Jay Bob Klinkerman. Klinkerman came up, she introduced herself by name and he appeared to know immediately who she was. They had previously talked on the phone. They went outside of the meeting room and did a brief interview, which the Rocky reported in the newspaper the next day. He admitted to being the man in the smiley-face tie.

Imse left and met Bauer and the Rocky photographer outside. Bauer more fully described the man she'd identified and Imse knew then that she had identified Klinkerman.

Our photographer still needed a photograph, so he waited for Klinkerman to leave. Bauer decided she wanted to confront him when he left. Imse waited to cover that encounter.

At about 8:30 p.m., a number of Young Republicans left the restaurant and noticed our photographer with his camera in the parking lot. Then Sandvall came out, asked if they were press and Imse introduced herself and the photographer. Sandvall invited them in and offered to let them interview and photograph anyone. He asked if they'd like to interview the speaker, and Bauer said no. (Imse now thinks he didn't hear her.)

Imse, Semon and Bauer went in. Bauer walked straight to Klinkerman and identified herself as one of the people he'd stopped at the president's speech. She said she'd like to ask him a few questions. He said he would not answer without his lawyer. She asked for the lawyer's name and he declined. Our photographer took pictures. Bauer and Klinkerman were very polite to each other.

Then, several of the Young Republicans, who clearly had no idea what was going on, became upset that Imse and Bauer had attended their meeting without identifying themselves to the group. Imse explained that she was not covering the meeting, had not taken notes, and had come only to meet with Klinkerman. She also explained that she had entered just as the meeting began and didn't have a chance to pull him out, so had waited politely through the meeting.

Meanwhile, Bauer had her own conversation with other upset Young Republicans. She told Imse later that one man said he was Klinkerman's PR person and asked for her card. She said she didn't have one. He assumed she was media, and she told him she was one of the people involved in the incident at the president's speech, and he said he would not talk to her.

Bauer never identified herself as media. She and Imse both went there to talk to Klinkerman only, not the rest of the group. Each identified herself to Klinkerman before speaking to him. Imse was not deceptive. Klinkerman understood who they were and was equally polite.

Discussion

  • May 2, 2005

    5:17 PM

    Clay Calhoun writes:

    Welcome to the blogosphere!

  • May 2, 2005

    10:07 PM

    Jude T. Sandvall writes:

    Dear Mr. Temple:

    Having enjoyed a great relationship in the past with the Rocky Mountain News I am sadly responding to your blog response to the Denver Metro Young Republican’s press release of April 27, 2005.

    I understand you were not in attendance at our meeting and the details of the event are second hand as conveyed by Ms. Imse. Being an employer myself I also understand your defense and support of Ms. Imse.

    However, there are critical details that pose ethical questions.

    The Denver Metro Young Republicans is a club that requires membership. We rent the facility in which we conduct our meetings. Both make it a private event. Because our event is posted on our website does not make it a public event. Naturally, guests and visitors are invited to attend and each is asked to stand and be recognized. Both Ms. Imse and Ms. Bauer neglected to introduce themselves.

    Ms. Imse and Ms. Bauer arrived at the restaurant together and sat together outside our private meeting area. Restaurant staff has confirmed this. They refrained from entering the social part of our event for more than 1 hour and only entered as our meeting was underway. They entered together and sat together taking notes. At the end of the meeting Ms. Bauer left quickly and joined Mr. Semon in the parking lot as Ms. Imse stayed in the event room. Soon, Ms. Imse exited and joined Ms. Bauer and Mr. Semon in the parking lot.

    When all three were approached and asked by me if they were with the press, Ms. Imse collectively spoke for the group. When asked if they would like to interview our speakers Ms. Imse responded “yes.” Ms. Bauer did not respond and was escorted by Ms. Imse and Mr. Semon into the building. As I attempted to gather our speakers to a quiet area for an interview Ms. Imse, Ms. Bauer and Mr. Semon entered the meeting facility and confronted Mr. Klinkerman.

    The questioning of Mr. Klinkerman by Ms. Bauer was more aggressive than “Can I ask you a few questions?” and more along the line of “I know you were at the (Bush) event, tell me who kicked us out.” While Ms. Bauer questioned, Ms. Imse took notes, and Mr. Semon snapped photos paparazzi style. The three left together.

    My questions to you is: Why was it not stated in Ms. Imse’s article that she had contacted Ms. Bauer and arranged the identification of Mr. Klinkerman? This directly violates the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists in “avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering information except when traditional open methods will not yield information vital to the public. Use of such methods should be explained as part of the story. And avoid misleading re-enactments or staged news events.”

    Surely, if this were within the realm of ethical reporting you and Ms. Imse would have no problem writing an article explaining exactly the circumstances by which you “reported” the “news” in your April 27th article.

    The Denver Metro Young Republicans’ have had until this event the utmost respect for the Rocky Mountain News and its reporters. I would ask that you do the right thing and notify your readers about the circumstances by which Ms. Imse “reported” the news on April 26th.

    Sincerely,

    Jude T. Sandvall
    President
    Denver Metro Young Republicans

  • May 3, 2005

    11:42 AM

    Nathan Hale writes:

    Mr. Temple,

    Your BLOG opener states the version of events you offer are the truth. Does that mean other viewpoints are lies?

    In 400 fewer words, see my response to your remarks.

    http://coloradopoliticalnews.blogs.com/colorado_political_news/2005/05/this_will_appar.html#c5373797

  • May 3, 2005

    12:50 PM

    Chad D writes:

    I agree the public deserves to know who was acting deceptively as a Secret Service agent to throw people out of a public meeting with the president of the United States. I can not agree with your tactics though. I commend Imse for going after the story. She should be at that meeting. I do question her bring Bauer to the meeting though. Your story illustrates that your reporter was able to get her interview and you photographer his photo without the "help" of Bauer. You could have shown that photo to "the three" as a means of identifying Klinkerman. I don't think Imse intended to set up a confrontation with Imse and Klinkerman just so she would have something to cover, but that is exactly what happened. While hindsight might be 20/20 foresight shouldn't be completely blind.

  • May 3, 2005

    4:26 PM

    Dan writes:

    Obviously, John, you must think we Republicans hang out in back rooms with cigars while we contemplate how to locate and toss rabble rousers out of meetings.

    Okay, so we like to hang out in back rooms, and have a cigar or two, but we would not waste one second on planning how to generate banned word lists, or how to say something in a politically correct way, nor how to best infiltrate the "opposition" camp to get a story or to make trouble.

    Sorry, we leave that kind of under-handed approach to the paranoid left wingers, such as yourself, and MoveOn.org. It is simply amazing that you should choose to abuse the Constitutional authority of the press to further your personal agenda rather than to give equal time to both sides.

    The DMYR story still has yet to be printed, and you are still on the defensive. In the end we will have more members and you will have fewer readers.

    Good luck :-)

  • May 4, 2005

    10:43 AM

    Jennifer Youree writes:

    Mr. Sandvall,

    I can't help but notice that, by your own admission, you had no problem with Ms. Imse's presence at the meeting UNTIL it became clear that she was pursuing a story unflattering to your organization. You invited her and those accompanying her into the "private meeting." You were perfectly comfortable to arrange an interview when you believed it would benefit you and your organization.

    Here's a little lesson about the Fourth Estate. They're messy. Invite them in and they might see things you didn't necessarily want them to see. They might ask questions you didn't really want them to ask. They might even talk to people with whom you didn't want them to speak. They'll usually say something that no one is 100-percent happy about. The truth is this: Mr. Klinkerman may well have been the man who helped trample the Frist Amendment rights of three of your fellow Americans. You should be as outraged as Ms. Bauer. Here's why. Civil rights violations, even alleged ones, are a lot like the press. They're messy. They snowball. Let one violation in the room and they'll silence views you never meant for them to. They'll shush voices you wanted to hear. Then, they'll come for you.

    The First Amendment in all its incarnations, Press, Religion and Speech, are messy and you can never silence one voice without inevitably silencing them all.

    Sincerely,
    Jennifer Youree
    www.lilredwagons.com

  • May 4, 2005

    3:09 PM

    Playdo writes:

    Mr. Temple - Your politics may be too far right for me, but I commend your reporting and your paper's reporting. This IS a story, and the Young Republican's response to your inquiries prove it. Keep digging!

  • May 4, 2005

    10:52 PM

    Nathan Hale writes:

    Jenn - I think Jude was trying to help our speakers and the press so they could have a professional dialog.

    Needless to say we were surprised at the REAL agenda. I doubt we will be as helpful in the future.

    See Jim Spencer column in the Denver Post today for more digging in the murkey world of GOP "No Comment".

Join the discussion

Required
Required (Will not be published or sold)

About this blog

Search this blog

John Temple's columns

Recent posts