Login | Contact Us | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Electronic edition | Subscribe to the paper
Subscribe to RSS   Add to My Yahoo!

October 12, 2008 10:00 PM

Bob Schaffer supports corporate greed and sticking families with higher health costs

Rocky Truth Patrol says: Flat-out wrong

Claim: Bob Schaffer supports corporate greed and sticking families with higher health care costs
Rocky Truth Patrol says: Just wrong

This charge came in a mailer sent by the Service Employees International Union. It shows a caricature of a Monopoly-style CEO gleefully tossing cash in the air.

schafferhealth.jpg

The mailing contends that "Bob Schaffer's health care record puts corporate profits over the needs of Colorado families." It adds that Schaffer "supports a health care plan that lets big corporations cut corners on costs by sticking their employees with higher out-of-pocket health care costs and less coverage."

The source for these claims is a 2004 story in our own Rocky Mountain News that ran when Schaffer was vying for the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate against Pete Coors.

Here's the quote from the story: "Schaffer outlines a free-market solution to rising health care costs. The problem, he says, is Americans are disconnected from the price of care. If they know an insurance company will pay for treatment, he asks, then what encourages patients to make cost-effective choices?
His proposal: Accounts that would allow people to save money, tax-free, for health coverage, and spend at their discretion. Let insurance kick in much later. Give unemployed Americans a refundable tax credit that acts as a voucher for indigent health care."

Schaffer's campaign manager, Dick Wadhams, said the story accurately reflects Schaffer's current views on health care. He supports McCain's health care proposals and backs health savings accounts. Schaffer believes that individuals deserve the same tax incentives that businesses receive to spur them to spend health dollars wisely.

The mailer goes too far and doesn't present any evidence that Schaffer wants corporations to "cut corners" and "stick" employees with higher out of pocket costs.

The union and the Schaffer have an honest disagreement. The union supports a single-payer system to boost access to quality health care while Schaffer backs a system of tax rebates to provide better care.



Discussion

  • December 21, 2009

    9:40 PM

    High Interest Savings Account writes:

    Awesome article, I've subscribed to your feed and I'm looking forward to your future posts here.

  • March 6, 2010

    5:20 AM

    Cherry Crans writes:

    Hi, there. I would suggest you continue writing more posts, this would make your blog even more interesting, plus I guess you will get more visitors.

  • May 22, 2010

    8:53 AM

    Fletcher Ballagh writes:

    This is good writing.

  • June 16, 2010

    3:14 AM

    Energy Savings writes:

    Wonderful to read!

  • June 21, 2010

    9:25 AM

    Brett Bratten writes:

    Nice selection of words. Let's see what happens.

  • November 27, 2011

    12:46 PM

    Abby Tica writes:

    I may go after comments I disagree with, however I don't seek the absence of the criticism of those with whom I do not agree.

Join the discussion

Required
Required (Will not be published or sold)

About this blog

Search this blog

Recent posts