[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Main | February 2007

January 31, 2007
Oil prices

I just read that there is good reason to believe record high oil prices may be due to our own strategic oil reserve, which the Bush administration may have been manipulating to drive up prices for the benefit of its clients. This is something Congress must investigate since there is plenty of preliminary evidence far too lengthy to go into in this letter. This manipulation goes far beyond corruption and is close to economic treason, because when oil prices increase America must pay more for its imported oil. That, in turn, increases the trade deficit and our foreign debt. Alternatively, one can think of price manipulation as the equivalent of a tax increase on American families that is paid to foreign governments, including Iran. While some small energy scandals are under investigation by Congress, the biggest is the strategic oil reserve, which may have been strategically manipulated to drive up oil prices. The key to understanding this manipulation is demand and supply and oil storage capacity. The market has been manipulated, involving Wall Street commodity speculation and the strategic reserve’s oil storage. The reason oil prices have been falling lately is that the market has finally run out of storage capacity, meaning oil produced must now be immediately sold. This indicates there has never been a supply shortage and if the administration hadn’t manipulated it like they did, oil prices might not have risen as they did. Now the administration is saying it’s going to double the size of strategic oil reserve from 700 million barrels to 1.5 billion barrels and will purchase 100,000 barrels of oil per day. Of course, the price of oil will jump again. Not only will there be an increase in oil, but they will also provide new storage capacity to re-corner the market. Congress must investigate this strategic oil reserve, how it has been managed and what its purpose is. The recently announced expansion serves no real national security function and will only drive up oil prices and add to the budget deficit and national debt. A recent IMF study reported that oil prices in the U.S. seem to be politically manipulated, falling prior to 2002, 2004 and 2006 elections.

Sharlene White
Colorado Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:36 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

The middle class

I often enjoy reading Vincent Carroll’s ON POINT columns because they give me something to refute. His latest, “The politics of envy,” (1/26) is no exception. Carroll claims that most middle class families are significantly better off now than they were in the 1970’s. He says that more families own homes, more kids go to college, and that median household incomes are much higher than they were in the 1970’s. Those statements seem to be true, however, they leave out a lot of pertinent data that indicate that middle class families of today aren’t really doing all that well. In his latest book,” The New Golden Age,” author Ravi Batra points out that data compiled by George Bush’s own economic advisers shows that nonmanagerial workers’ weekly real wage, which is the purchasing power of one’s salary, was $310 in 1978, but fell to $277 by 2005. I would also mention that many middle families now carry a monthly credit card debt of $6-8,000, if not higher. The concentration of wealth is also at an all time high, as Batra notes, with just one per cent of families owning more than 40% of the collective net worth.
Besides the fact that college tuitions have shot up greatly, many middle class students no longer go to their first or second choice colleges, they go to public institutions instead, because they cannot afford to do otherwise. Some public institutions are pretty good, but many lack updated facilities. Many families that used to have well paying manufacturing jobs lost them in the last twenty years. If they were able to get new jobs, these jobs often paid 30% less than what they were making. Add on higher gasoline prices, and rising health care costs, and I would say that the middle class is “taking it in the shorts.”

Robert H. Moulton III
Commerce City

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:35 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

ID program

Re: “Senators: Worker ID program needs fixing” published on January 23, 2007.
I am adamantly opposed to theBasic Pilot Employment Verification System, a systerm that would essentially create a governmentpermission slip to work for everyone, regardlessof their citizenship status. The basic pilot programhas the ability to dramatically infringe on the privacy of ordinary people. Ithas proven to be ineffective andinaccurate, containing errors on a full two percent of U.S. citizens and about 50% of the non-citizens who should be eligible to work. As a U.S. worker, I am appalled that I could be denied the right to work based on a faulty government database.
The thought of being required by the government to carry a high-tech ID card with both my Social Security card and Visa cards with biometric features reeks of Big Brother. I feel no safer and no more secure knowing the government has created a one stop shopping source for identity thieves. I would like to see some real comprehensive immigration reform, not quick fixes.

Crystal Middlestadt
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:31 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Iraq

You quoted an editorial (26Jan) gloating that ‘Wider insurgency is being..defeated. All that’s left is AlQuaeda.” This writer was happy that Baathists are fleeing the country.
Another way to put this fact “SECULAR Saddamit insurgents (who, we hoped, would sign a separate peace with US, have fled, leaving in control of Anbar, only the implacable AQ fanatics.” Reason to celebrate?
Such implacable optimism reminds me of MarkTwain’s cheerfully reconstructed memory of a fight he was in: “I thrust my nose firmly between his teeth and threw him to the ground on top of me !”

Dan Lyons
Fort Collins

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:30 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Prosecutors

Prosecutors gone wild Is it a disease? If so let us quarantine it now. A North Carolina D A hides evidence of innocence. A federal prosecutor gives immunity to a drug smuggler to testify against two border patrol agents. A federal special prosecutor indicts a guy for lying to federal agents about a crime that never existed and to which the prosecutor already knew the answer. These guys, Nifong, Sutton and Fitzgerald , do not deserve to be in positions of power. if I have ever seen prosecutorial abuse and hypocrisy as it is personifed by these three.

Robert Lipton
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:29 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Tinted windows

I remember writing a letter to the editor a few months back (If only car windows, noise laws enforced! August 16 2006, page 32A), wondering why police don’t ticket the drivers of vehicles with tinted or blackened windows. I remember citing the “drive-by” shooting of a local sports figure as a good reason to begin enforcing this law.
Here we are, five short months later, and another “drive by” on another sports figure. By another car with tinted windows.
Tonight the police are looking for a vehicle invloved in another “drive by". It is described as having tinted windows.
I’m not saying that all people who choose to break the law by tinting their windows are breaking other laws, but since most of our violent crimes are committed by people driving vehicles with tinted windows, would it not seem prudent to begin our war on gangs by enforcing the law against tinted windows? In Colorado, folks might be surprised to learn that an “opaque or nontransparent or a metallic or mirrored appearance” to the front-seat windows is AGAINST THE LAW.* Please excuse me if I sound patronizing, but could we please enforce this law? I don’t know who decides which laws we enforce these days (it sure isn’t the citizens of Colorado), but maybe they could give folks a 30 or 60-day grace period, and then start ticketing people breaking this law. It would be inconvenient for some (you should have read the rules first, duh - http://www.municode.com/resources/gateway.asp?pid=10257&sid=6), but it would make us all feel safer. More importantly, it would be inconvenient for the parasites of society if they could no longer cower behind tinted windows.
Most importantly, it would be a start.

* - Sec. 54-76. Windshield and window obstructions.
(Code 1950, § 507.8; Ord. No. 697-82, § 1, 12-13-82) State law references: Windows unobstructed, C.R.S. 1973, 42-4-224.

Greg Fuller
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:16 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Cell phones

This letter is to the parents of the children featured in the “Readin’, Writin’ and Textin’” article in the Monday, January 22, 2007, Rocky Mountain News. Am I the only one who was struck by the fact that 6 out of 10 of these children openly admit that they ignore the school rule not to use a cell phone in class? Only two flatly said they did not; the other two waffled.
To the parents of the six children who admitted using their cell phone in class, congratulations! You have managed to raise children who have an utter disregard and disrespect for authority. I know, I know; your child’s safety is far more important than any silly school rule. After all, when someone else’s precious darling brings a gun to school, you want to be the first to know about it. But take heart, your child’s disrespect for you is probably exceeded by their disrespect for their teachers.

Linda Feher
Castle Rock

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:15 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Stress disorder

After reading the letter by Lee Vander Jagt ("Stress Disorder Used To Be Called Cowardice") concerning a young soldier suffering from his Iraq War experiences, I was struck by Mr. Vander Jagts’ equating combat stress with cowardice. As a former National Guard member who served in the safe 1980s, the closest exposure to ‘combat’ I ever had was listening to older Guardsmen, who were Vietnam veterans, reminisce about their war experiences, often in tears.
Mr. Vander Jagt made reference to General Sherman in his letter, which called to mind for me another famous general, General Patton, who had slapped a soldier who was suffering from PTSD-or “Battle Fatigue", as it was called-during WWII. Patton, too, was incensed at the soldier’s seeming “cowardice". Perhaps Mr. Vander Jagt is himself a combat veteran, who was able to endure the horrors of war. Unfortunately, not all soldiers who experience combat are able to withstand the trauma it entails. Does that make them “cowards"?
The soldier referred to in the letter was, in my opinion, courageous even to have joined the Army in a time of war, knowing that he would very likely experience Sherman’s “Hell” of battle-a choice he freely made, and a choice not given to the soldiers who were drafted to serve in WWII and Vietnam. I can’t say that I would have joined the military now, with a war going on, so perhaps I am guilty of cowardice as well.
We should pray for the young soldier, and for all his comrades who are now in harm’s way- and we should not be too quick to judge those who have gone through what many of us have not.

Frank W. Berger
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:14 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Dems ready to hit us in the pocketbook again

The free-spending Democrats are at it again. Not being satisfied to tax us to death, they are now attacking our pocketbooks through the private sector (“Dems plug line of bills on alternative energy,” Jan. 18).
They have “announced a raft of bills to diversify the state’s power portfolio and drive new economic development and educational opportunities.” It sounds wonderful, doesn’t it?
The key question in all this is how is it going to be paid for and who will pay it?
The proposal calls for mandating the utilities to generate 20 percent of their energy from renewable sources, planting wind generators at schools, and biofuel grants. Since all of these ideas have not reached a level of cost as low as the fuels we are now using, this is going to cost consumers more. Way to go, Dems! Are there any practical thinkers on the Democratic side of the aisle?

Roger Wilson, Golden

Posted by denver-admin at 12:02 AM | Comments (57) | TrackBack

Point out GOP excesses

Why don’t the tax-and-spend Democrats, who so quietly accept that title, point out the relationship between the borrow-and-spend Republicans’ highly touted current prosperity and the some $3 trillion increase in the national debt in the last six years. Total national debt is about $9 trillion now, I hear.
Give any high school lad an unlimited credit card and he can appear very prosperous, like the richest kid in town, in just a couple of weeks. But down the road — somewhere, sometime, somehow — someone is going to have one heck of a credit card bill to pay off! Speak up, D’s!
Guess who will pay for all this apparent prosperity — of which I get to see none!

Ray Lashley, Grand Junction

Posted by denver-admin at 12:02 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Abolish Electoral College

How can the Rocky, in all honesty, write in its Jan. 22 editorial (“Don’t neuter Electoral College”) that “SB 46 has the potential of disenfranchising Coloradans to serve a cause that purports to promote democracy.” Purports? That is exactly what SB 46 is all about! Our presidents should be elected by a direct vote of the people. Neuter the Electoral College? No. Abolish it! Then, we can talk of democracy.
Don’t render meaningless all the votes cast for a losing candidate in any state. To do so is true disenfranchisement.


Rick Kearney, Colorado Springs

Posted by denver-admin at 12:02 AM | Comments (42) | TrackBack

Delaying the inevitable

The Rocky Mountain News says that President Bush’s “conviction regarding the war on terror is genuine, so much so that he’s bucking public opinion and Congress itself in his determination to succeed” (“Mostly dead on arrival,” Jan. 24). The Rocky doesn’t give him enough credit for his ability to see reality.
Not even Bush can still believe he can succeed in Iraq. He must be well aware that the “surge” (escalation) is merely delaying the inevitable, kicking the can down the road until he’s out of office, so his administration doesn’t go down in the history books as the one that lost the war.

Ben Anderson, Castle Rock

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

January 30, 2007
Rail transit

The Jan. 5 editorial, “Ranger Xpress a very low priority,marks a low point in the Rocky’s stature as a thoughtful and responsible long- range voice in Colorado. I am committed to the opposing conclusion that the Ranger Xpress initiative is vital if Colorado is to have any chance of breaking free of the dual affliction of blacktop and airport TSA lines.
The journalistic and factual quality of this editorial is minimal. The cost threat appears to be a fear tactic to irrationally scare off supporters. In reality, only those who truly enjoy riding solo in the rush-hour grind and standing in TSA security lines for hours on end should join the Rocky’s position.
Careful decision-makers will recognize the great long-term benefit of the Ranger Xpress. With reasonable and measured support at the federal, state, county, city and private levels, the fearful cost presented by the Rocky is entirely achievable.
Restoring the backlog of costly blacktop repairs should have no bearing on pursuing the benefits of the Ranger Xpress. The Rocky Mountain News is flat wrong to imply otherwise.

Ralph Trenary
Loveland

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:01 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

The new Rocky

You continue to sail along on your newsprint cloud, in denial of the facts. The print news media is liberally biased. While you blissfully assume that this bias is only perceived, your attitude offends the people most willing, and able to read, anything. You must, therefore, save money when and where you can, trying to hang on until your paper shrinks to nothing. People are not required to buy what they do not like.

Harold Perkins
Littleton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

The new Rocky

You asked for comments on your new size.
First of all, there is nothing new about constant change in order to mislead the readers, advertisers and employees. Lets face it, this is about a reduction in the consumption of newsprint. Why not tell us, the victims of your corporate greed, how much more money you are putting in the bank? Knowing a little bit about your operation, and that of your government sanctioned monopoly Denver Newspaper Agency, you certainly won’t be disseminating it to the few employees you have left.
Secondly, the new smaller size begins to mirror the minds of your editorial page and opinions. Although, I have my doubts that you can ever reduce the size enough to compete with the miniaturized intellect reflected in the writings of Mike Rosen, Vincent Carroll and John Temple.
Lastly, is it only coincidence that the progressive thinking of Mike Littwin, my favorite columnist, has been relegated as far back in the paper as possible without leaving altogether ?

Paul Greene
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:59 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Cost of water

Hello.
Just a quick note about the misinformation that the media doesn’t check and the public some how accepts as fact.
We all see the reports in this paper and others that water costs more per gallon than gas.(check Friday or Saturdays paper) That simply is not true. The only water that costs more is bottled water and that is a choice like Calvin Kline Jeans. It is not needed like gasoline. Non Bottled water is pennies per gallon! Period! Check your water bill...do the math...water per gallon is no where near the price per gallon of gas.
Buying bottled water is a choice like buying a coke or a candy bar....Am I supposed to be happy because a pound of snickers is like over $17 per gallon and gas is $3.00 per gallon! Come on! The oil companies are raping America and all we do is look to the side and whimper like a wounded deer that has had an arrow shot through its temple.
Thank You.

Steven J. Schell
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:58 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Know-it-alls

I have found, in the last several decades of my life, that the persons who really, really have the solutions to local problems do not work here, do not live here and have 20/20 hindsight.
Bob Nielsen
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:57 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

God & man

Letter writer Brian Walsh complains about the lack of critical thinking in church schools (“True critical thinking not in church schools,” Jan. 2). Walsh states, “Of course, any critical thinker would realize that evolving biological components have no correlation whatsoever to the inert matter making up a computer.” He forgets to mention, however, that if human beings didn’t exist there would be no computers, let alone critical thinking.
I am quite confident that Mr. Walsh, along with all of his critical thinking skills, cannot explain how life came to be. At the same time he appears unable to thank his creator for the gift of critical thinking. It is this God-given gift that enables human beings to create, study and enjoy all of our technological marvels.
Mr. Walsh claims that the world has endured well enough despite the fact that most people are not Christian. In our world we have much suffering from violence, poverty and lack of love. Right now our gods seem to be computers, cell phones, big-screen TVs, etc. I have nothing against technology and science, but I wonder how much better our world would be if all human beings truly made Christ the Lord of their lives.

Dina McNulty
Westminster

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:56 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Saddam Hussein

I was floored by the lack of perspective when I read Franki Rader’s letter in which she wrote that she felt sad at Saddam’s death (Alone in sadness? Jan. 5.) What? Witnessing the devastation Saddam left and hearing the firsthand accounts of his brutal rape and murder of thousands, I find her words to be incredibly offensive and an overt sign of her ignorance.
Does she weep for the thousands of Kurds who were maimed, tortured and gassed? How about the Arabs in Dujail who were raped and tortured in response to perceived opposition, or the Iranians, who were tortured in indescribable ways during the eight-year war, a war in which chemical weapons were used? How about the systematic rape and removal of even his very own people throughout his bloody reign of terror?
The hanging brought the end to one of the vilest creatures this world has known. Though his death doesn’t make up for the rapes, murder of babies, kids, men and women, the torture, the gassings, etc., it was the only justice possible.
The letter demonstrates the twisted thoughts of the hysterical anti-war movement which has poisoned the debate.

M. Mascari
Iraq war veteran
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:56 PM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Health care

I have lupus, an autoimmune disease that requires many expensive drugs to keep healthy. In 2005, I paid $13,000 out of pocket for prescriptions that I have to take on a regular basis. I did not have drug insurance until Medicare Part D was put in place. Without this benefit I would have paid $18,000 in 2006 for my drugs. Instead I only paid $4,500 a huge savings.
When I learned that Medicare Part D would become available in 2006, I researched the drug plans and chose one whose formulary included the drugs that I need. I signed up for this plan and have been extremely satisfied with how it has benefited me.
The problem with the Medicare prescription plan is not the plan itself, but the difficulty in determining how to access the best plan to meet the individual needs of the consumer. It is complicated and Webbased two factors which that limit many seniors from knowing which plan to choose.
The law is working, which is why I am urging our congressional representatives to vote against the drastic and very risky legislation to put the government in charge of negotiating drug prices. Currently, Medicare beneficiaries can choose among competing private plans. In contrast, HR 4 would dismantle the prohibition on the government interfering in negotiations over drug prices, and, as a result, dismantle the robust market that has driven prices down.
I fear that with government interference, many of the drugs I need to take will no longer be available to me through my prescription drug plan as there are no generic equivalents for them.
At a time when seniors are on fixed incomes, putting roadblocks in their path to getting the drugs they need to stay healthy is a very bad idea.
I urge Rocky readers to contact their representatives and urge them to vote no on HR 4.
Thank you.

Anita A. Fricklas
Centennial

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:55 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Government

If you like how government removes snow from the streets, you’ll love how they manage your health care system. Vote for Hillary Clinton and big government in 2008!

Brian Core
Brighton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:54 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Religion in schools

Loretta Abbott makes a number of erroneous statements in her letter of Jan. 2, “Ed commissioner has an excellent point.”
First is the fallacy, oft repeated by the theocratic right, that “secular humanism” is, itself, a religion. Humanism is a logic-based philosophy that celebrates and encourages human achievement. Humanism does not require faith, and is therefore not a religion.
Abbott writes, “By refusing to allow anything that refers to God or Christianity in the classrooms, we are declaring that there is no God.” Public schools certainly do allow the teaching of the history and traditions of many religions, including Christianity, but to teach any religion as fact is inappropriate and unconstitutional. Abbott evidently confuses this necessary absence of doctrine with the active promotion of atheism.
The article in question revealed the shortcomings of several online learning programs in which some parents had enrolled their children as an alternative to traditional classroom instruction. If any of these parents’ choices were for the reasons Abbott cites, this illustrates a failure of understanding on their part, not any failure by the public schools.
The place for teaching faith is in church and in private religious institutions, not, as Abbott would suggest, in any taxpayer-funded public school.

Bradley R. Cook
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:52 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

State of the Union

President Bush gave his State of the Union address Jan. 23rd. Much of it had to do with Iraq and to protect the American people. It seems to me fear was used to continue to gather support for Iraq and his War on Terror.
Fear, a tactic often used, well what about our country’s energy crisis- seems pretty scary to me. Our current energy situation is serious. Mr.
President said we “need to solve problems not leave them for future generations.” I couldn’t agree with him more!
We need to take action now. We must invest time and money into research and technology of renewable and alternative energies. Ideally it would be great if this was all we had to but our nation is addicted to oil and natural gas.
We can’t just expect to quit cold turkey. To reduce our dependence on foreign oil we need to, safely, open up our countries land and resources for domestic exploration.
Step by step, we will start to bring our nation closer toward energy independence. The president had one thing right, we do need to take action now, and not leave problems of today for future generations.

Greg Archuletta
Golden

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:52 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

No one’s owed an apology for a blizzard

So, Rocky columnist Bill Johnson seems to think the Regional Transportation District should apologize for the blizzard (“Sorry seems to be the hardest word at RTD,” Jan. 19). I wonder if Johnson expects an apology from the pizza places who were clearly derelict in their duties for not getting through with the pizzas. My kids’ school also should be ashamed that they could not operate just because of a few snowflakes and I feel an apology from them is in order, too. Also I did not receive my newspaper for a few days, so put the Rocky in line to say sorry, too.
An act of nature shut our city down for three or four days; for someone to be looking for an apology is very petty. If every business that could not operate properly due to the storm had to apologize, imagine how long the line would be. It would look like a voting station on Nov. 7. I can see the line now: RTD, Ronald McDonald, the Burger King guy, Yellow Cab, Metro Taxi, DIA, Dominos, Pizza Hut, and so on and so on — all saying sorry to Johnson for not running flawlessly during a blizzard.
In short, Mr. Johnson, neither you nor anyone else for that matter are owed an apology for an act of nature. I say get over it and move on.

Keith Maranville, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Will Denver ’08 see a repeat of Chicago ’68?

Amid the hullabaloo regarding the Democratic National Convention coming here is forgotten a large possible downside.
We are engaged in an unpopular war and the fever swamp (i.e., Michael Moore, Daily Kos, etc.) is already pressuring the new Democratic majority to immediately abandon Iraq to the savages.
The Dems have a huge quandary. They must hide their hard-core liberalism long enough to get a president elected in a “New Democrat” fashion, as with Bill Clinton. Folks won’t vote for someone with the views of a “San Fran Nan” Pelosi — she’s far too dangerous. Hiding their leftism will be difficult since this means at least giving lip service to the war against the Islamonazis and keeping us engaged in same.
If the summer of 2008 finds us still in Iraq and Afghanistan, we might find some protesters here in Denver for the convention. Remember Chicago in 1968? I do, and this could be worse. Much nastier bunch today, these angry hatemongers on the left. Be careful what you wish for — you might get it.

Pat Desrosiers, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Dems eager for ’08

Republicans I know say they find the Democrats’ love-in at the state Capitol, in Washington, and in capitals across the country disgusting. I just tell them, “It’s a sight better than the Republican hate-in we’ve been forced to witness of late!”
Also, it does my heart good to see John McCain throw his support 100 percent behind the lame and wounded duck, W. By all accounts, McCain had been the sole Republican with any chance of winning the presidency in 2008. He just single-handedly sank the Republican ship (or what was left of it).
There is one thing that Republicans do well, and that’s not listen to the people. We common folk are just champing at the bit. We wish the election were today. Then there’d be real celebrating!
Joe Felice, Aurora
Bible among most precise of ancient texts
Letter writer Travis Schriner (“Jesus spoke about tolerance, not hatred,” Jan. 12) is mistaken about the accuracy of the Bible.
First of all, the canon was not created or changed by the church. The church recognized that the Bible was inspired by God when it was written.
Second, the Bible is recognized as the most accurate book of its time.
When archaeologists found the Dead Sea scrolls, they compared the scroll of Isaiah with Isaiah 53 of the Bible. The only change they found was the addition of one three-letter word out of about 400 words in all, and that word does not change the meaning of the whole passage. After 1,000 years of being copied, the Bible has little difference (if any) from the original written documents.

Melissa D. Barnett, Broomfield

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (23) | TrackBack

Schultheis goes too far

As a Republican, I believe that Democrats must give thanks every night for state Sen. David Schultheis. He is “Exhibit A” for those who associate conservatism with bigotry and meanness of spirit.
It was bad enough that he sent an open letter to a family that had just lost children, questioning whether they were in this country illegally. But now he’s outdone himself.
His criticism of Gov. Bill Ritter’s goal of reducing the dropout rate for minority children — because of a supposed impact on illegal immigration — defies rationality.
Colorado needs to address illegal immigration, but also needs to find ways to give minority children a better chance in life.
If Schultheis is typical of Colorado Republicans, then the Republican Party will deservedly remain the minority party.

Tom Giordano, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

SOS! Scrape our streets

I am very disappointed by the lack of response by the Littleton and Englewood city governments regarding snow removal on residential streets.
Although snow-removal crews have done an excellent job of clearing the main streets of snow and ice, most residential streets have been left untouched for more than three weeks now.
Not only does this irresponsible inaction affect the taxpaying residents of both cities, but it also creates hazardous driving conditions for everyone and results in unnecessary costs in suspension, alignment and other vehicle repairs for the individuals who must drive on these streets.
Please come scrape the ice and snow off of our residential streets.

Kevin Rohrman, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Rain, not glacier melt

The Associated Press article carried by the Rocky Mountain News on Jan. 23, “Alps glaciers will slip away by year 2050, scientists say,” was interesting. In it, the AP flatly stated, “Runoff from melting glaciers caused severe flooding that devastated parts of Switzerland in the summer of 2005.”
In fact, much of southeastern Europe — particularly Romania, but also including Switzerland — was hit hard by flooding in the summer of 2005.
Romania has no glaciers. The cause of the flooding was unrelenting rains in August, not melting glaciers.

William Knudson, Boulder

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Secondhand fumes

Recently I was playing slot machines in a Black Hawk casino. I came home reeking of other people’s secondhand scents from perfumes, colognes and various other artificially scented products, which are far more ubiquitous than any secondhand smoke I noticed.
People can avoid smoke if they choose to, but what about those of us who experience adverse health effects from secondhand man-made fragrances that also contain numerous harmful chemicals? Is the air really cleaner? Perfumes are also indoor air pollutants, and cause many people migraines and asthma.

Connie Pitts, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (26) | TrackBack

A link to 9/11 at last

In his letter of Jan. 23, “A plan for Iraq,” Leonard Muniz suggests that Congress put a deadline of Sept. 11, 2007, on any troop surge.
President Bush should welcome this suggestion. At last, the Iraq war will have something to do with 9/11.

Jim McCauley, Fort Collins

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

January 29, 2007
Flag flap

Larimer County’s resident radical Republican Kevin Lundberg (R-Berthoud) stepped into the national spotlight Friday. Through coverage by the Associated Press, fringe-issue Lundberg can now claim the title of Colorado’s first (only?) anti-military anti-veteran Republican.
By standing against HB-1050, Display of Flags, Rep. Lundberg perpetuates a ban on flying the POW/MIA Flag and continues the fear and confusion of the flawed current state statute. Lundberg appears in the AP story to imply that HB-1050 would allow any flag to be permanently displayed. This is false picture of the bill on three points: first - that only the US, Colorado and POW/MIA flags are allowed on the flag-poles of state facilities, second - that the educational needs basis of other displays are correctly returned to the discretion of local school boards, and third - that foreign flags are only displayed for “...special, occasional, ceremonial purposed...” according to Federal Law.
Perhaps this is just another of Lundberg’s acts to oppose and criticize anything initiated by a Democrat. Reading the entire bill before speaking on the House Floor would be a good technique. Regardless, he’s wrong and Colorado’s veterans and members of the Armed Services deserve an apology.
HB-1050 is a necessary reform measure that removes awkward and harmful language in the current state law, allows appropriate honors and recognition to veterans and the armed services, and restores control of methods of instruction to local school boards.
With those truths revealed, how can Representative Lundberg explain his opposition?
His Capitol telephone number is 303-866-2907, and his email is Kevin@KevinLundberg.com. Please join me in explaining to Representative Lundberg that he’s out of line on this issue.

Ralph Trenary
Loveland

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:26 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Israel

Six months have passed since the unprovoked abduction of the three Israeli soldiers. Yet, their families have heard nothing from them. The mainstream media is calling for the defense of the Islamic terror suspects at Guantanamo Bay. Yet, we hear no demands for the release of the Israeli prisoners in Lebanon and Gaza. It would seem that it ought to be the other way around. Where is the outcry? We hope that the Congress will do whatever is necessary to hold their captors accountable for this reprehensible violation of human rights.

Brian Stuckey
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:25 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Unborn children

It is reported on Breakpoint that livestock is given more protection from pain than the unborn child. According to the report, the child becomes fully aware of pain by 20 weeks, which is even more intense than the pain felt by a newborn child. If this report is true, then it is imperative for the Congress to approve the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act for the sake of our unborn children. By doing so, women will be informed of the consequences of their actions and many lives will be saved.

Brian Stuckey
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:25 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Bill Ritter

I found the symbolism behind Bill Ritter’s inaugural cannonade interesting. A lot of smoke, a lot of noise, but nothing actually happened. Is this what we can expect from our new governor?

Mark Stahlke
Centennial

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:24 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Rocky’s coverage

I am writing this letter as proxy for Morris Smith, Coordinator for the All Veterans Honor Guard:

It is with great pride I offer my thanks to your paper and to Jim Sheeler for the superb story on the All Veterans Honor Guard and the internment of one of it’s founders, Waymon Griffin. Though “Griff” was not known by all members of the AVHG, he will certainly be remebered as one of it’s finest members for his dedication and perserverance in the establishment of our volunteer organization.
We would also like to thank most graciously, those who have sent contributions to the All Veterans Honor Guard that we may continue our service to our fallen comrades. We are proud to offer military honors and consider it an honor to do so. Again, your contributions are greatly appreciated.

Joseph P. Pettrow
Centennial
for Morris W. Smith
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:23 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Mike Rosen

What planet does Mike Rosen live on, and how do I get there? It sounds like such a wonderful place, where even the poor have “cars, TVs, appliances, computers, $200 basketball shoes and own their own homes”
(Populists equalize poverty, Jan. 19, 2007). Close down all the food banks and homeless shelters - we don’t need them!
When trying to justify the unjust, Mr. Rosen tries to marginalize those who do not think like he does. He likes to label people to equate them with something bad ("progressives” equals “socialists"). He presents weak excuses, such as income inequality being a “result of the concentration of abilities in a minority of men". Last time I checked, there were a lot more people with abilities than just the top 1-2% of the population.
Mr. Rosen also likes to present the “straw man” argument to justify his position. In this case, the “only” alternative to policies of progressive taxation is “absolute income and wealth equality". Really?
There are NO other alternatives? Why do we send politicians to Washington? We could have Mr. Rosen solve all our problems!
Then, Mr. Rosen tells us to be wary of misleading economic statistics “glibly tossed around by populist politicians", and then he “glibly”
throws out a misleading statistic of his own - one that he really loves, since he uses it ALL the time. “[T]he top 2 percent of Americans pay two-thirds of all income taxes". That is using a small number versus a large number to mislead the reader. How about this statistic: the richest 2% of adults in the world own more than half of global household wealth. Or, in the years 1983 through 1998, the average household wealth of the top 1% in the U.S. increased by 42.2%, while the bottom 40% DECREASED by 76.3%.
My hard work just results in the guys at the top getting insanely wealthy, while I get a token raise, or lose my job to outsourcing. With those odds, where is the incentive to work harder?

Mark A. Seberger
Larkspur

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:22 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Gangs etc.

I am evolving strategies to reduce violence, related to gang or drug activities, in memory of Darrent Williams of the Denver Broncos. As part of the discussion I forwarded a letter, written to News editorial cartoonist Ed Stein, to the Evergreen Newspapers chain.
The response from Evergreen Editorial proves to me that prevention of violence must include information related to “risky behaviors of victims". Status-quo has been to let victims rest in peace. Investigations, for public records, don’t often list circumstances in the lives of the victims which led them into harm’s way.
The context of my letter to Ed Stein included reference to drugs and presumed gang retaliation as the primary motive in the unsolved Littleton Subway murders of Nick and Steph’, Columbine High student sweethearts, on Valentine’s Day 2000.
Evergreen Newspaper said allegations of drug distribution by a victim had not been alleged or reported by anyone in law enforcement. Maybe not for the record. I do have a photo of Sheriff Stone holding a cardboard billboard, with names of juveniles and faces of adults, listed due to (mostly) drug-related investigations in the aftermath of the Subway murders.
If one reason gangs thrive in the Denver metropolitan area is because victims families are intentionally spared the additional grief of truths about the risky behaviors of their loved ones, then perhaps we had better learn to better handle these truths before American cities end up like Baghdad Iraq.
By the way, excellent update by Marilyn Robinson on the Cold Case of the Littleton Bowling Alley murders from 2002. If you report similarly on the Columbine Subway Cold Case, remember it is in Jefferson County. Ever since the massacre at Columbine High School, most of the media labels our part of Unincorporated Jefferson County as Littleton by mistake.
The United States Postal Service identifies some of Jefferson County as “Littleton” for ZIP-code purposes only. Mislabeling the jurisdiction of unsolved crimes doesn’t make us any safer, and perhaps sends tips to the wrong investigators.

Steve Schweitzberger
Littleton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:21 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Lafayette vote

In February the citizens of Lafayette, who voted in last November’s election, will receive a ballot in the mail. This ballot will ask them to vote to annex land, approve zoning and allow the construction of a Lowe’s Home Improvement store. This Boulder County land currently serves as part of a community buffer between Lafayette and Broomfield.
This issue is more than just a question of revenue for the city of Lafayette. This issue asks the citizens of Lafayette to question the ‘bigger is better’ and ‘more is not enough’ philosophy so pervasive in our culture and one we are helping to spread around the globe. This philosophy threatens the well-being of many so that a select few can earn huge profits at the expense of our planet’s limited resources.
There are more than the individuals who own the land in question involved in this issue. At a minimum, also involved are those individuals who own and work in local hardware and lumber stores will be affected due to the lower prices Lowe’s is often able to offer as a large corporation - a corporation in which most employees will never meet the ultimate owner who is likely earning a salary that is at least 10 times more than most Lowe’s employees can even dream of making.
Enough is enough. Now is the time for the citizens of Lafayette to vote their consciences. Residents of Boulder County can also impact this issue by helping the citizens group, Preserve Lafayette (www.preservelafayette.org), raise enough money to purchase the land and preserve it as a rural buffer and wildlife habitat on Boulder’s County’s eastern edge.

Cherri Jacobs Pruitt
Lafayette

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:21 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Winter driving

I have noticed some articles on the increased sales of SUVs since the storms. Mentioned are various models without apparent differentiations between AWD (All Wheel Drive) and 4WD (4-Wheel drive). Maybe a primer on the differences would be apropos in a future article. I have a GMC Envoy SUV that has selectable 2WD, AWD, 4WD Hi and 4WD Lo with an automatic locking rear axle. After the first storm, I had parked in the street (so I wouldn’t have to get out of the alley) and my SUV was plowed in. I did a little shoveling, enough that I thought I should be able to drive out. I couldn’t move, just spun the tires. Then I realized I was in AWD, I switched it to 4WD and it walked right out of the snow bank. AWD seems to work best in general driving on icy and snow packed roads, but once one is stuck; there is nothing like 4WD to extricate oneself. I also helped a neighbor trying to move an Audi sedan with AWD that was stuck in the intersection where there was a dip for runoff, same thing; she couldn’t move, just spun. My neighbor asked if he could try driving it, she said yes and after spinning it he noticed that the Audi had some kind of a “traction control” system that was on, he turned it off and the Audi moved out like it was on clear pavement. Not sure why, but maybe an article on these nuances would help the public decide on what type of drive train they should be looking for in an SUV, since they are definitely not all created equal. Also, maybe a primer on how to best utilize what we already own would be helpful. Happy trails!!!

Carl Paschke
Highlands Ranch

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:18 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Electoral vote

Regarding the legislature’s action to short-circuit the proper way to amend the U.S. Constitution and have Colorado’s presidential electoral vote be given to whoever wins the national popular vote.
Recall the 2004 vote in which the cliff-hanging question was to whom Ohio’s electoral vote would go. By a slim margin, Ohio’s 20 electoral votes and the election went to Bush. What if Ohio had voted for Kerry instead of Bush and also had decided to give their electoral vote to the winner of the national popular vote? Then their 20 electoral votes — and the election — would still have gone to Bush since he won the popular vote by about 3 million votes. Check it out. Just Google “electoral college” on the Internet.
The same math works for the combined 19 electoral votes of Colorado and Arizona. If the voters of both states had gone for Kerry instead of Bush (tipping the election to Kerry) but they gave their votes away to the winner of the national popular vote, Bush would still have won.
Our electoral vote is important. It is Colorado’s bargaining chip that forces national decision-makers to pay attention to us. Changing a system that has served this country well is a two-edged sword.
The people of Colorado rejected this idea two-to-one in a referendum in 2004. Why are Colorado’s legislators so eager to thumb their noses at this decision of the voters? Giving our electoral votes away no matter how We The People vote is a sure way to trivialize Colorado. Changing a system that has served this country well is a two-edged sword.

Thomas E. Mullins
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:18 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Union members

The legislation proposed by Democrats which would require non union members to pay dues in unionized work places, would be payback for financial support in the last election. To be fair to members and non union workers dues should be apportioned between administrative and political activities with each member designating to which political party his contribution should go. This will never happen with Democrats in control of the legislature, and therefore the legislation is a means to increase Democratic party funding.
I speak from experience, having paid dues in the United Auto Workers and permit fees in the Steel Workers.
Tom Melrose, Highland Ranch

This letter has not been edited

Posted by denver-admin at 03:15 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Corporate crime

Even in death, Ken Lay from Enron and his friends get away with crime. In today’s RMN, Federal Judge lets investors and shareholders to drop charges against sever people. Influence does have a bed partner.

Leroy M. Martinez
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:15 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Immigration

I felt that the January 23rd article entitled, Senators: Worker ID program needs fixing, should be titled, Senators: Worker ID Program needs nixing! The article recognizes many of the flaws of the Worker ID program, but ignores the fact that to remedy such a system would include the issuance of redesigned high-tech ID cards — likely including both Social Security cards and visa cards with biometric features — at a cost of at least $4 billion.
And, to what avail? This system would still be fraught with problems.
For instance, this system would require the creation of massive government data bases of our most private information posing a substantial risk to U.S. residents’ personal privacy and civil liberties, which are already dwindling under our current administration.
This system would also put the responsibility of proving citizenship on the shoulders of the worker. It isn’t hard to imagine that under this system many eligible workers could be victims of defensive hiring, which are employment practices that weed out people perceived as immigrants, or whose ethnicity suggests that they might be in the category of workers for whom verification is time-consuming and costly.
There is already rampant discrimination against Arab-looking individuals in our airports. I’d rather not add a system that will promote even more discrimination against people who look like immigrants. I suggest we get rid of the current Worker ID program, and start looking for a solution that actually solves the problem and doesn’t forfeit our civil rights and promote even more societal discrimination.

Naomi W. Marshall
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:14 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Outsourcing

Vincent Carroll’s latest ‘nya-nya!’ column (25 Jan) says that even if our middle-class IS being seriously harmed by outsourcing, there’s nothing we can do about it.
However, there are several measures we could adopt:
—first, stop laying a FICA tax on every dollar that firms pay to US workers,without taxing their money for foreign workers.
—second, wipe out pointless tax-breaks for the wealthy;
—third, use the extra money to GIVE tax-breaks to firms INSOFAR AS they hire Americans!
What Carroll is gloating about is the undoubted fact that our one-party Republicrat system WON’T do anything to mitigate outsourcing harm to our middle-class workers.

Dan Lyons
Fort Collins

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:13 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Snow

Thanks to all of the snow this season, I have contracted two diseases - shovelitis and shovelosis! My doctor has prescribed a shovelectomy, and my insurance doesn’t cover it! I hope it’s not fatal.

George Lilly
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:12 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Iraq

When a person of limited knowledge or experience - but unlimited arrogance - takes his own advice, thats stupidity - as defined by George W. Bushs conduct of the war in Iraq. Were the president to have applied his new Surge strategy four years ago, with a couple of hundred thousand additional troops - when it had a chance of succeeding - we might be long out of Iraq.
At this stage, in order to be victorious over the insurgents - if thats even possible - it might be necessary to bomb Iraq back to the Stone Age.
Our Commander-in-Chief missed his window of opportunity of providing security to the Iraqis when it might have been relatively easy, so there is no use killing more innocent civilians and sacrificing more of our own troops. Time to fold up the tents, Mr. President. Your partys over ( we hope! )

R. Kiefer
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:11 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Environment

I am a high school student concerned about the environment. The President’s State of the Union addressed important issues, but I was disappointed in his obvious attempt the use the issues to support the War in Iraq. I had been expecting a plan on how to help global warming, not a way to stop using foriegn (Middle Eastern) oil.

C. Kee
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:10 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Climate change

I am not a scientist, and do not pretend to know what is causing ‘global warming’, but I do read enough to recognize that the subject is highly debatable. The mainstream media would like you to think there is no debate, however, and uses the topic to further demonize ‘evil’ corporations and Republicans. A mere 20 years ago, Time Magazine warned us all that an ice-age was coming; yet somehow, coinciding with a Republican in the White House, humans have destroyed our climate in just eight years (I never saw a national newscast discuss global warming when Clinton was in office). One has to be at least be somewhat skeptical. I have seen stories on global warming on all three network news programs, yet have NEVER seen one that shows the mountains of evidence suggesting it is a natural occurrence. There is a clear and obvious political agenda in the global warming debate, supported by the national media. It is a shame, because I don’t think Americans are getting both sides of the story. I predict that the second a Democrat sits in the White House, the issue will be reported more fairly and people will be allowed to draw their own conclusions. Until then, I suggest you take the topic for what it is: a polarizing, politically charged tool to further a specific agenda.

Chris R. Hotz
Greenwood Village

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:08 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Pro-union bill

I have been following, with interest, the paranoia and hysteria of the business community and neo cons regarding the improvements in the Colorado Labor Peace Act as put forth in the Legislature. As was done with the “new and improved” Rocky Mountain News format, this is an attempt by the legislature to streamline our archaic labor laws and bring them into the 21st century.
Although there have been many reasons for, and explanations of, the win ratios required under the current Act, I feel that none of them have told the real truth about the unconscionable requirements put on the employees and their representative (union) to prevail. For example, a bargaining unit of 10 employees seeks to negotiate a contract with a union membership clause. The employees vote 6 to 4 in favor and they lose. Or, even worse, when the election is held lets say only 4 people choose to vote in it and all vote yes. The employee representative (union) still loses because, even though the vote is unanimous, less than 50% of the bargaining voted in the majority. Nowhere in our country. except Colorado, is any election held that requires one side to “win” with a 75% majority. I think it is safe to say that very few, if any, candidates carried 75% of the vote on November 7, 2006.
It is ironic in all this discussion that no one informs the public that regardless of the outcome of this special election, the union, by law, must spend its money representing dues payers and freeloaders alike, without discrimination. That is like requiring the Rocky Mountain News to distribute its product to all residents of the State and allowing only those who want to, to pay for it. This is fairness?

Paul F. Greene
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:07 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Greeley & gangs

Recently this newspaper carried a story about gangs. Greeley and its gang issues were featured prominently in that story. Inasmuch as every city in Colorado beyond the tiniest has at least some gang presence, I wanted to provide some additional facts about Greeley’s experience.
Some years back Greeley residents decided they did not like the rising number of crimes committed by gangsters occurring in their city. In response, the police department bolstered the size of its gang unit. (The team is considered to be one of the most knowledgeable and effective in the state.) The city’s recreation leaders developed additional alternatives for kids headed towards a gang life. The local newspaper highlighted the gang issue. City Council added police officers to the streets.
Beginning in 2006, the police department focused on gang intervention as the cops’ primary goal for the year. That goal has continued into 2007. All officers, not just the gang unit, were tasked with locking up violent gang offenders. The Weld County District Attorney’s Office obtained lengthy sentences for a number of dangerous gangsters, and continues to do so.
As a consequence, gang violence in Greeley has steadily declined for the last three years. In 2004, 44 incidents of gang violence were counted in Greeley. The figure dropped to 33 in 2005 and 17 in 2006. We still have some gangsters, but what we are doing is working, and we are going to keep up the effort.
Greeley is a great city with a lot of really nice people. It is also a city that, like every other, has crooks who, given the chance, are willing to victimize others. Some of these criminals happen to call themselves gang members. But to portray the city as gang-infested or unsafe would be erroneous. Greeley is a great place to be, and we intend to keep it that way. We are working to make the city even safer in the future.
We are doing very well, thank you. But work remains to be done, and we are pledged to accomplish it.

Jerry Garner
Chief of police
Greeley Police Department

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:07 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Child support

After reading that the State of Colorado makes men still pay child support for children that are not biologically theirs my first thought was, “ What an extreme injustice! .
I hope Colorado rights this wrong.No man should have to pay for his wife’s infindelity.That’s insane!
I would like to see the bill go farther.I would like to see the bill address refunds to the men who have been “duped” as the article put it.
This man should be paid back every penny he has paid in child support.As well as other men that have paid child support for children that are not their’s.
I would even go further with this bill.I would make it mandatory for DNA tests to be done before child support gets determined.
I would also make the women pay all court cost and attorney fees if found that the husband or boyfriend is not the child’s father.
I think we need a little deterence to stop woman from claiming children are someone’s to get child support.
This power that women have over men to pay child support for children that are not the mans child is an insane policy that harms everyone ,except the woman.You have children who think that one person is their father and then they find out that they don’t know who their father is.
What message is the mother sending to her children?
I urge all lawmaker to correct this wrong and make it mandatory that the men that are duped get reimbursed the money they have paid.

Tracey L. Fanning
Thornton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:05 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Firefighters & cancer

The Rocky’s stance in “The Politics of Cancer” (January 28th) is indefensible and an insult to all firefighters in Colorado.
The Rocky contends that the proposed law is an attempt by unions to “make up for lost time", however as the Rocky later notes, the proposed law would equally apply to volunteer firefighters, who aren’t unionized, and career firefighters, many of whom are also not unionized. So much for that (weak) argument.
The Rocky also failed to do even the most cursory research into firefighters and cancer. A study conducted by the University of Cincinnati found that firefighters are at a far higher risk of contracting certain types of cancer than people in many other professions. The study found that the rate of testicular cancer is 100% higher for firefighters than the general public, that the rate of prostate cancer is 28% higher and that non-Hodgkins lymphoma is 50% higher than the general public.
A study by the insurance industry found that the mere act of serving the public as a firefighter brings about an approximate 5 year reduction in life expectancy versus the general public.
With all this in mind, even the Rocky should see past it’s typical anti-labor stand and support this legislation that will make sure that those that take care of the public are themselves taken care of.

Bob Falcone
Driver/Engineer, City of Pueblo Fire Department
Colorado Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:05 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Child support

Concerning the article on “Duped dads", Arnie Goldstein, associate director of the Excelsior Youth Center in Aurora says “Whoever raises the kid is the father.” I say, let Arnie pay if he is so gung ho. This is another example of the extreme left ruining the good name of the Progressives. This is the kind of thinking that lets the IRS go after employees who paid their taxes in good faith through their employers, but the employers never forwarded the payments to the IRS.
According to ABC News*, “Supporters of paternity identification bills point to a 1999 study by the American Association of Blood Banks that found that in 30 percent of 280,000 blood tests performed to determine paternity, the man tested was not the biological father.” “Most state laws are based on Medieval English common law, which assumed that a married woman’s husband fathered all of her children. The U.S.
Supreme Court upheld this presumption in 1989 when it gave a custodial father rights over a noncustodial biological father.” The Supremes also upheld slavery and put Jehovah Witnesses in jail for failing to salute the flag, against their religious beliefs.
While your at it Arnie, in between telling others how to pay for the rest of their lives for the lies their spouses perpetrated on them, maybe you can adopt a few dozen of these kids and pick up the tab. Then you can walk a mile in their shoes.

Julio Edwards
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:03 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Wolves

Surely you can do better than a headline like that. It is true, the wolf population must be cut down, they are destroying livestock and other wildlife. Go to Yellowstone and see what is left of the elk herds.
DOW pays for “confirmed” livestock kills now, but that process means about 1 out of 10 actual kills are “confirmed". Families are paying the rest of the cost.
Once they are delisted, each of the 3 states must have a plan in place to compensate ranchers who are now carrying the burden. DOW and the rest of the cheapskate wolf lovers will have no responsibility whatsoever. The wolf numbers must be brought down to a reasonable level to protect ungulates and private property.

Marion Dickinson
Greybull, Wyo.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:02 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

English language

My God, what has happened to the Empire?
I admit that I was somewhat seduced by the English from the beginning, especially in terms of their basic cultural and postwar ‘Commonwealth’ geopolitical perspective. But it is the incredibly beautiful language with all of its complex nuances and subtleties and what it is possible to do with it that most intrigues me. Consequently I’m either exactly the right guy or exactly the wrong one to ask what in the world has happened to the English language in America? It has become so distorted as to be almost unrecognizable and actually painful to the ears in the way that it is treated/practiced here. Most other English dominated/founded/colonized countries speak the language almost musically and there is no language more eloquent and beautiful to listen to when done well.
I find it ironic then that so many Americans vehemently demand that ‘fereigners’ speak English which in truth they don’t themselves. I’d be much more comfortable if in the future the true believers insisted rather that the ‘fereigners’ speak some facsimile of English as do they, that’s all.

Grant D. Cyrus
Boulder

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:01 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Iraq

For some time I have been solidly behind the troops and their deployment in that hostile and murderous country in order to protect us here at home. However, since we have had no attacks here and the constant drumbeat of the press and Democrats to bring the troops out I have had a change of heart. I now agree. Bring the troops out and re-deploy them where they will be safe. My tax dollars are funding protection for a land that I do not live in and I want them out with no more funds wasted on that dangerous place or it’s people. It is time for them to take care of themselves! Did I say Iraq?? Oh no! I am talking about Washington D.C.! The “troops” are, of course, the capital police and the city police. It is a known fact that the murder rate there is far worse than Iraq , my tax dollars are funding the police yet I do not live there and thus am not threatened, nor has Washington D.C. crime affected me. It is arguably a terrorist stronghold that few Americans wish to protect! So I finally agree, lets pull the troops out, starting with the capital police. The Congressmen and Senators, staffers and bureaucrats can and should take the responsibility of protecting themselves first. It is long past time they did. Then we will do a phased withdrawal of all of the police in town, starting with areas most populated by Democrats and the press. Also, in agreement with Congressman Murtha and the Dems, I think a redeployment to somewhere the police will be safe is in order. How about Norfolk Va.. The military there can keep them safe and we can always send them back in to Washington if the need is great enough, although I cannot think of any situation which would warrant it. Let the people in that dangerous hellhole take care of themselves.
I am tired of the cost in blood and treasure and agree we should pull them out NOW!!!!!!

David L. Cook
Loveland

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Iran

With Israel and the Zionist-dominated U.S., all under the umbrella of the demonic oil cabal and world money power, gearing up to destroy Iran via the use of nuclear weapons, it should be made known to the world of yet another fabrication as an excuse for war.
“Across the world, a dangerous rumor has spread that could have catastrophic implications. According to legend, Iran’s President has threatened to destroy Israel, or, to quote the misquote, ‘Israel must be wiped off the map.’ Contrary to popular belief, this statement was never made, as this article [by Arash Norouzi] will prove.”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=NOR20070120&articleId=4527 The words “map,” “wipe out” or “Israel” were never spoken.
On October 25th, 2005, President Ahmadinejad, delivered a speech at a program titled “The World Without Zionism.”
“In his speech, Ahmadinejad declares that Zionism is the West’s apparatus of political oppression against Muslims. He says the ‘Zionist regime’ was imposed on the Islamic world as a strategic bridgehead to ensure domination of the region and its assets.
Palestine, he insists, is the frontline of the Islamic world’s struggle with American hegemony, and its fate will have repercussions for the entire Middle East.”
“He concludes by referring to [the late Ayatollah] Khomeini’s unfulfilled wish: ‘The Imam said this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time. This statement is very wise.’ This is the passage that has been isolated, twisted and distorted so famously. By measure of comparison, Ahmadinejad would seem to be calling for regime change, not war.”
You would do well to spread this message far and wide to possibly avert more psychpathic insanity from those consciousless, cold-blooded killers who are working overtime to enslave humanity in their “New World Order.”

Steve Campbell
Glenwood Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:59 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

Once again, politics are out to hurt the common individual. Amendment 41 was enacted to level the playing field in the political arena, to keep politicians somewhat “honest", to prevent the “haves” from always beating out the “have nots” because of money, Now, there are two young high school students who have worked to volunteer many, many hours of their free time, WITHOUT any underlying motives, to be awarded scholarship money, only to be told they cannot take it because their parent or guardian is working to make a living, and their employer is the State Of Colorado.
Then you have the ever helpful politician, Democratic Sen. Peter Groff, who won’t lift a finger to support these kids. These are your future voters, Senator. These kids not only deserve these scholarships, but, have earned them by working harder than you do, I assure you.
I cannot help but wonder, if these kids had been your own, would you be so quick to shoot them down, or would you be on the front page, for a “photo-op", flexing your democratic muscle, and doing everything in your power to exclude scholarships from this amendment? Or perhaps this was a child of a relative, neighbor, or monitary supporter- would you be so quick to say “Our hands are tied??” I seriously doubt it.
It is time the politicians start doing what is RIGHT for the people. These kids EARNED these scholarships, GIVE them the money! I for one am tired of the bureaucratic smokescreen that politicians hide behind. The Democratic Party is supposed to be for the people. If that is the case, fix this now, so, in the future, deserving students don’t get slapped in the face when they get rewarded for putting forth an effort with no expectations. Great message your sending here.
So, yes, you may have a “mess to clean up” but, do your job and put forth an effort to do it.

Roberta Callow

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:58 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Iraq

I wish I’d known then what I know now.
Four years ago, I supported the invasion of Iraq. I thought that a man who had invaded his neighbors, who had used weapons of mass destruction, who had ignored seventeen United Nations resolutions, who had failed to establish his compliance with his treaty obligations, who had murdered hundreds of thousands of his own people, and who had attempted to assassinate a former President was a person who deserved to be removed. However, I would have rethought that support if I’d known than what I know now.
I wish I’d known then that the United Nations would dishonor the memory and honorable service of Sergio Vieira de Mello by removing all United Nations presence from Iraq after de Mello was murdered, all the while obstructing the U.S. to hide the Oil for Food Scandal.
I wish I’d known then that the entrenched bureaucracies within our own government would undermine the policies of the President at every opportunity and fail miserably at their role in reconstructing Iraq.
I wish I’d known then that the American media would refuse to tell the stories of Medal of Honor winners or other heroes like the Deuce-Four (even though “unprofessional” journalists like Michael Yon managed to get their story), refuse to show pictures of enemy atrocities while magnifying embarrassments like Abu Ghraib, happily transmit uncorroborated stories of carnage by the enemy, and publish details of top secret national security programs.
I wish I’d know then that the political class would grow a mile-wide streak of cowardice, including taking such “principled” stands as unanimously confirming the general who has advocated and would implement the President’s new strategy, while simultaneously contemplating several measures that would express disapproval of said strategy.
I wish I’d known then that just five short years after getting a “wake up call” which we would “never forget,” the country would roll back over and hit the snooze button, blithely returning to the post-Vietnam glory days of American impotence and Iranian ascendancy.
Yamamoto was wrong, apparently, when he warned his Emperor that they had “awakened a sleeping giant;” he just chose the wrong strategy to slay that giant. One body, one drop of blood, one kamikaze at a time would have been a better way to fight America . . .
As we seem poised to prove—yet again.

Michael Alcorn
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:57 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Space program

This week, we paid a somber and reflective look on past missions for space.
First was Apollo I and then the shuttle Challenger. We have lost brave men and women in the quest for knowledge that is space. We have lost scientists, military and even a teacher for the greater good of all mankind. We have not stopped seeking answers, and I am sure that those we have lost would ask us to strive forward in the quest. We can not abandon space exploration any more than we can abandon our individual lives. Space holds more answers to any question we can ever ask, past, present or future. For no matter what we are able to answer, there will always be more to be found. As we remember those who have died, let us respect and honor them. Let us expand our quest into space, let us land on foreign planets in the name of Grissom, White and Chaffee. Let us name interstellar transports in the names of Scobee, Smith, Resnik, McNair, Onizuka, Jarvis and finally let us name a research station in the name of McAuliffe. These men and women gave their all for all of mankind. As did the crew of Colombia. Mankind’s greatest achievement is the ability to overcome strife and adversity in the pure pursuit of knowledge.
When we land on Mars, Neptune and GOD who knows what else, let us remember those who have gone before us. Let us remember that we stand on the shoulder of giants and that these brave “Star Travelers” did, on a fateful day, did indeed “Reach Out and Touched the Face of GOD". GOD speed Challenger, Apollo 1 and Colombia. May the stars welcome you always to their fold and embrace you. May we, the people of earth, one day honor your memories and reach out and find the answers to questions you asked.

Nick A. Adlon
Sheridan

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:56 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Photo selection

I have particular interest in Dr. Jordan’s remarks regarding higher education in Colorado. I am a Metropolitan State College of Denver parent and employee in the Office of Admissions. As MSCD is an integral part of Denver, and therefore Colorado’s economic growth and stability, I am assured that this piece has a much broader perspective than that of my own personal agenda.
Dr. Jordan and countless others have worked and continue to strive tirelessly to bring MSCD to a position of pre-eminence in our state. A crucial factor in this emergence is the attention received by the media. This goal and vision is a cooperative, team effort, and one that certainly should not be taken lightly.
I must question your judgment on placing a file photo of a CU Boulder student studying in Norlin library to highlight this piece. The photo was pulled from your 2003 archives. Surely your institution must have archived photos of students studying at Auraria library on the Auraria Higher Education Campus. If not, given the immediate geographical proximity of your office to Metropolitan State College, it should not have been too arduous to obtain a photo of a Metro student studying.
I do applaud the Rocky Mountain News for its general success in accurately informing the public. This time, however, I feel your desk may have slipped in its attention to detail.

Ann L. Himel

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:54 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Why Qwest, Rocky dislike Net neutrality

The Jan. 13 Rocky Mountain News editorial failed to provide readers with an adequate context for what the Net neutrality fight is all about. If giant corporations like Qwest are successful in their multimillion-dollar lobbying efforts to gut the Internet Freedom Protection Act, consumers and small businesses alike will suffer.
Currently, every Web site on the Internet is equally accessible. That means I can access a small one-person news blog as easily as the Rocky Web site. It also means that I can access AT&T-owned Web sites over Qwest infrastructure without Qwest interfering to make AT&T’s content slower and less desirable. The current system of Net neutrality offers a level playing field where a small independent bookseller can compete head to head with giants like Barnes & Noble online. Large corporations like Qwest want to be gatekeepers that control which Web sites load fast, which ones load slowly and which ones won’t load at all. That’s what the Net neutrality fight is all about.

Lawrence Jones, Conifer

Posted by denver-admin at 12:02 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

2 other key reasons to oppose Net neutrality

The Rocky is right to oppose new federal regulations on the Internet, but the editorial missed two important reasons this is such a bad idea.
First, Net users are increasingly seeing online delays caused by video downloads and other data-rich applications. Meanwhile, spam and spyware remain out of control. A federal law that mandates “neutrality” would stop Internet providers’ ability to prioritize legitimate content that consumers genuinely want.
Second, neutrality regulations would be a serious roadblock to bringing the benefits of high-speed Internet (including distance education and medical specialties) to rural Coloradans.

Christopher Wolf and Mike McCurry
Co-chairs,
Hands Off the Internet coalition
Washington, D.C.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:02 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Officials must admit scourge of gangs

Colorado law enforcement officials have obviously known for some time of the increasing gang problem in Colorado (“‘Colorado has been targeted,’” Jan. 20). I can recall little significant mention of this issue from elected officials, however, and I’m wondering why. Could it be that Gov. Bill Ritter and Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper are ignoring the problem in view of its significance regarding the attraction of future business or conventions?
Elected officials should be at the forefront with regard to protecting Colorado’s citizens from criminal activity. With the exception of U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo and the Rocky Mountain News article noted above, I’ve never heard of the Mexican drug cartel’s direct connection to Colorado.
It is imperative that those we have elected at least start some dialogue pertaining to these deadly organized gangs. If we don’t admit publicly that Colorado has indeed become a hub or “sanctuary” for these activities, how will we deter those who view us as soft targets of the future in their quest to more intensely dominate our state, our cities and our neighborhoods?

Doug Duncan, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Amendment 41 needs quick correction

I am writing to add my support to the call for immediate corrective action on Amendment 41. As the Rocky’s editorial of Jan. 1 points out (“‘Sorry, your majesty, I can’t accept the Nobel’”), we should not have to wait for a University of Colorado professor to decline a Nobel Prize before fixing this broken amendment.
However, it’s not only Nobels that could be affected. Apparently, awards such as the MacArthur Foundation “genius grants” would fall into this category, as would many other lesser-known awards.
Colorado is already having trouble attracting and retaining top-notch researchers into state higher education. We don’t need any more disincentives.
I don’t doubt the sincerity of the authors of Amendment 41, but what they believe about the effects of this amendment is not important. It is the interpretation of the amendment by the courts that matters. Until such time as a case goes before the courts, I’ll trust the opinion of the state attorney general over that of Common Cause, Jared Polis, or any of the other backers.
One question: Since he paid for the original campaign, can we send Polis the bill for the election to fix the problems?

Greg Wimpey, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Resistant bacteria no evidence of evolution

Believers in the faith of evolution can be counted on to claim bacteria developing resistance to antibiotics as proof of their religion (“True critical thinking not in church schools,” Letters to the Editor, Jan. 2).
This is an example of natural selection — no new genetic information is created in this process, merely selection from an existing pool.
Evolution depends on mutation, something that almost always causes a deleterious degradation of the genetic makeup of an organism. Sometimes mutation may cause the elimination or duplication of some genes which might give the organism a survival advantage. So it is that we see induced mutation of fruit flies giving rise to extra wings. The wings were already there; chance creates nothing!
I’ve searched in vain for an example of a mutation that gave rise to novel genetic information which resulted in beneficial new traits in an organism.
Such examples should be numerous if evolution were the creator of all life.

Brad Wood, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (28) | TrackBack

Forget a ‘win’ in Iraq, let’s get out — now!

I think it’s way past time to cease the endless prattle about how to “win” this fiasco in Iraq. Let’s remove our troops, not send more in!
Question: What is there to win in Iraq? If we “win,” do we get to keep Iraq, or do we have to share it with the imaginary “Coalition of the Willing”?
I would like to have our co-commander-in-chief, Dick Cheney, answer my questions since the C.I.C. himself is vitally busy promulgating a strategy — after four years without one — to competently prosecute a senseless war in which the United States alone has lost more than 3,000 soldiers, with more than 12,000 maimed, and possibly as many as 100,000 innocent Iraqis killed.
It’s time to bring the troops home, give Iraq back to the Iraqis (albeit without a leader) and fire Halliburton — now! We certainly hanged Saddam Hussein posthaste, and I suggest we use that same alacrity in leaving Iraq!

Lillian Norgren, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (43) | TrackBack

Back to Carter

So Mike Littwin doesn’t like U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo’s platform which, at its most basic level, is protecting America (“Tancredo covets platform, not presidency,” Jan. 18). Well, at least he has a platform and is not afraid to speak his mind.
We know nothing about Sen. Barack Obama, because he has no platform and offers no new ideas or direction for the country. Sen. Hillary Clinton, that’s another story: We know much about her — need I say more?
It appears Littwin would like to go back to the good ol’ days of Jimmy Carter and his bumbling cronies.

Richard A. Dombrowski,
Centennial

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Tancredo trips up

I trust I wasn’t the only reader to enjoy the irony of U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo’s quote regarding the dangers of the United States becoming a bilingual country: “ ... I don’t think that’s a good idea. I think it’s something that brings us apart, not together.”
“Brings us apart”? Before he insists that everyone learn to speak English, perhaps he should master it himself.

John Goldstein, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Doing God’s work?

Democrats and liberals constantly talk about the “separation of church and state” yet their politicians sound like my priest at Sunday Mass! Gov. Bill Ritter, in his recent inaugural, said government “exists ... to ensure we take care of seniors, that we take care of the disabled. It exists so we take care of those who struggle mightily for whatever the reason.”
I am new to Colorado, but does our Constitution really say that? My church and the Bible tell me to help those in need, but an amount is suggested and not withheld from my paycheck.
I am tired of paying my taxes so politicians can attempt to do God’s work — after they take their cuts off the top. I can only pray to God for some relief since voting sure doesn’t seem to help.

Jeff Tokarsky, Parker

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (25) | TrackBack

Extend smoking ban

Kudos to Rep. Anne McGihon and Sen. Ken Gordon for introducing a bill to add casinos to the list of workplaces where smoking is prohibited (“Smoke-free casino bill on tap,” Jan. 13).
I have been to Black Hawk once in the past year and don’t care to go back into the casinos because of the smoke smell. I sympathize with the employees who are forced to work in those conditions. I don’t believe that restaurants have suffered from the ban and hope that casinos will be added to the list.

Jan Frederickson, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (379) | TrackBack

Zoning board ordeal

Have you ever been to a Denver Zoning Board meeting to voice an opposing position? Spare yourself the humiliation. It was somewhat of a surprise to realize their votes are cast well before the meeting, but we never expected to be treated by city officials, particularly the chairman, with such rudeness and disrespect. Their message is clear: your presence and opinions are wasting our time.

Cathy Fielder, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 28, 2007
2 other key reasons to oppose Net neutrality

The Rocky is right to oppose new federal regulations on the Internet, but the editorial missed two important reasons this is such a bad idea.

First, Net users are increasingly seeing online delays caused by video downloads and other data-rich applications. Meanwhile, spam and spyware remain out of control. A federal law that mandates "neutrality" would stop Internet providers' ability to prioritize legitimate content that consumers genuinely want.

Second, neutrality regulations would be a serious roadblock to bringing the benefits of high-speed Internet (including distance education and medical specialties) to rural Coloradans.

Christopher Wolf and Mike McCurry
Co-chairs, Hands Off the Internet coalition
Washington, D.C.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:45 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Why Qwest, Rocky dislike Net neutrality

The Jan. 13 Rocky Mountain News editorial failed to provide readers with an adequate context for what the Net neutrality fight is all about. If giant corporations like Qwest are successful in their multimillion-dollar lobbying efforts to gut the Internet Freedom Protection Act, consumers and small businesses alike will suffer.

Currently, every Web site on the Internet is equally accessible. That means I can access a small one-person news blog as easily as the Rocky Web site. It also means that I can access AT&T-owned Web sites over Qwest infrastructure without Qwest interfering to make AT&T's content slower and less desirable. The current system of Net neutrality offers a level playing field where a small independent bookseller can compete head to head with giants like Barnes & Noble online. Large corporations like Qwest want to be gatekeepers that control which Web sites load fast, which ones load slowly and which ones won't load at all. That's what the Net neutrality fight is all about.

Lawrence Jones
Conifer

Posted by denver-admin at 10:09 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 27, 2007
Love the new format and Littwin’s locale

Thank you for the new format of the Rocky. I love it, and only wish the Saturday Rocky was the same. I spend more time on weekends folding the paper to a manageable size than it takes to read it. And I also appreciate the new placement of news stories and columns.
Poor Mike Littwin, though. He has had to come face to face with the fact that he, Tina Griego and others are not news reporters, but rather writers of opinion columns. This means that placing these columns in an Op-Ed section is the right thing to do. I have, in fact, written to the Rocky before about placing columns in the news section when they are not news.
Littwin also doesn’t like to share space with someone who isn’t paid to write opinions, such as writers of letters to the editor. He believes we are all “clueless.”
Well, as someone who isn’t paid, but has had 30 letters printed, indicating a degree of Rocky editorial appreciation, I can assure him that I, and others, are not clueless, and we are as capable as he is of having a valid opinion that can be expressed with a degree of literacy.
If Littwin isn’t happy with the placement of his column and his pay, I’ll volunteer to replace him. I am also capable of writing on a wider variety of subjects than he apparently is.
Get over it, Mr. Littwin, your column is where it belongs.

Florence Michael, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

No current events?

While the Rocky had announced, warned and otherwise prepared us for the new physical dimensions of its daily product, it did not warn that the type size would also be reduced to almost unreadable and that it was giving up current events. Front-page coverage of a train-bus wreck from 45 years ago just doesn’t grab much interest.
This is indeed a sad day for those of us in the Rocky Mountain region who enjoyed our first cup of coffee with the Rocky Mountain News.

Liz Wolfson, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

All-time favorite

The Rocky Mountain News is my all-time favorite newspaper. The new size is most convenient, and the quality of the color work is outstanding.
A request: Please don’t bury the Spotlight section in the Sports section. It’s a bit awkward to have to wade through Sports to find it.
Keep up the outstanding work.

Ken Urban, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Online letters worse

The Rocky’s new online version of the letters to the editor page reeks of infantile stupidity.
To have to click on each one, read it, then go back to grab the next one is a complete waste of time and will preclude me being able to enjoy that part of the Rocky.
Too bad — you had a good thing going.

Ted Sell, Las Vegas

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Thank you, Rocky

Thank you very much, Rocky Mountain News, for bringing back the Bridge column and Today in History.
I’m also grateful that the Rocky has not totally eliminated various stock prices, selected commodity prices, and large mutual fund prices as did The Denver Post.
That is the reason why I now subscribe to the Rocky Mountain News, after receiving the Post for the past 37 years.

Don Monroe, Centennial

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

January 26, 2007
Energy plan lauded

I’m writing to strongly applaud Gov. Bill Ritter’s proposals for a new energy future for the state of Colorado. Given the abundant natural resources available to us here in Colorado, our failure to use them previously is nothing short of offensive.
The potential for renewable energy sources here is mind-boggling, and I couldn’t be more pleased that we’re finally laying out strong targets for using wind and solar power. These initiatives will help our economy, our security and our environment.
Much thanks also needs to go out to all the organizations that have been working to develop a new energy future for so long — thanks for fighting for Colorado’s future.

Dan Stafford, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Way to go, Jeannie!

I don’t usually bother reading descriptions of what celebrities wear, because I don’t care, but the Rocky sucked me in with a headline about the Ritter inaugration (“A night to kick up his boot heels,” Jan. 13).
I was charmed to learn that first lady Jeannie Ritter has the confidence and good sense to wear what she likes without feeling she has to bow to style gurus and the notion that something has to cost a fortune to be just right. Way to go! Here’s a celebrity role model I could recommend.

Linda Berry, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

‘Stress disorder’ used to be called cowardice

The sad picture in the Jan. 13 Rocky of the forlorn young soldier who wants out of the Army because of the dreadful things he saw in Iraq (“Terrors of war linger for some”) will impress a lot of mommies, perhaps, but not many men.
This fellow joined up intending to spend a lifetime in a proud career in the military. One problem: Apparently he did not think it might involve battle, or, if it did, Army Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman could not have been right in describing it as “hell.”
Other soldiers are horrified and sickened by the consequences of firefights but they hang in and prevail.
This fellow claims “post-traumatic stress disorder” from things he saw and wants a kindly nation to turn him loose. It will sound a whole lot more like cowardice to many. Cowardice in the face of the enemy used to get you a firing squad; now it is called PTSD and you are sent home to your family while fellow soldiers fight to the end.

Lee Vander Jagt, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (37) | TrackBack

January 25, 2007
Casino exemption is OK

The exemption from the smoking ban for casinos does make good sense despite what the Rocky Mountain News ("Extend smoking ban to the casinos," Jan. 17) and Sen. Ken Gordon state.

A casino is not a restaurant, a movie theater or a bar. Some casinos have a policy of no smoking in their restaurants (great) and at least one has a large no-smoking area for customers (also great). To a smoker, a casino is a place where you can lose your money, have a drink and a cigarette - all ill-advised vices (in some people's opinion). These "pleasures" are a part of the Old West atmosphere. Colorado casinos will indeed lose money should the smoking ban be extended to them. Unfortunately, they could very well lose the money to other states.

Roy M. Cantrell
Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 08:26 PM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Pro-union legislation a naked power grab

House Bill 1072 is a naked power grab by that most un-American of all American institutions, the AFL-CIO. The “labor movement,” which has nothing to do with the actual performance of labor and everything to do with how much can be gouged from employers by the legalized extortion process known euphemistically as “collective bargaining,” is a wholly owned subsidiary of a Democratic Party that continues staggering and lurching to the far left.
Clearly, the unions are only too happy to help in efforts to bring collectivism and socialism to our republic. The deck has been unfairly stacked for the unions since the passage of the National Labor Relations Act in 1935; it’s characteristic of them to want another unfair advantage by negating the Labor Peace Act in Colorado.
With only 11 percent of the nongovernment work force unionized (down from almost 50 percent at the end of World War II), it’s obvious that the average American worker has gotten wise to what unions are really all about. And the unions must do something to boost membership.
As Whittaker Chambers noted presciently, “The left can triumph in America only through duplicity and subterfuge.” And both are the stock-in-trade of America’s labor unions and the commissars and gauleiters who run them.

Frank Howe, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (14) | TrackBack

A delicate balance

It’s only now, with House Bill 1072, that the Colorado Association of Commerce and Industry is worried about upending the delicate balance between labor and business (“House OKs bill friendly to unions,” Business, Jan. 23).
For years, when the Statehouse was stacked with labor haters and its friends, CACI lobbied heavily for a right-to-work (for less) law, which would not add just one finger to their side of the scale, but most of the fingers from most of the CEOs in Colorado and the nation.
There was never a mention about labor balance then. Now that CACI and organizations like it see a slight against them, they all start preaching about equilibrium in the business community.
What hypocrites.

Douglas Champiny, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

As realistic as Bush’s plan for Iraq

Upon announcing his administration’s new strategy for winning in Iraq, President Bush also asked for any fresh ideas. Here is my plan, which I believe is as realistic at this point as his:
First, I would send in a spec ops unit led by Chuck Norris; there would be a lot of hand-to-hand combat, with the terrorists being thrown across tables and chairs that break easily.
Next I would order a pinpoint air attack by an ace air squadron with Tom Cruise leading the way. While the targets are being shown getting blown up, CNN and Fox News could add a stirring contemporary musical soundtrack, to lift the war-weary American morale.
Finally, Steven Segal would single-handedly move in to secure the troubled areas of Baghdad. He would do this by twisting the evil terrorists’ arms and bending thumbs until they cry “Uncle!” The other bad guys seeing this, would immediately throw down their weapons and run. Segal would then defuse a bomb attached to a major oil pipeline with two seconds left on the countdown.
My plan is under review.

S. Bath, Northglenn

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (15) | TrackBack

Naming of Berman to ed board disappoints

I was displeased to see that Elaine Berman was appointed to serve on the State Board of Education after an eight-year stint on the Denver Public Schools Board of Education.
The district’s performance declined while Berman was a member of the DPS board, so how are her years of DPS service a credential for an analogous state position?
While she was president of the board, the DPS retirement plan was “double-dipped” by retirees who returned to the workplace, and “triple-dipped” by administrators who purchased years of service instead of having to work for the district for the same period of time as other workers. Doesn’t this describe her values as a public representative?
Heck, for an entire year her board didn’t even approve any meeting minutes! I don’t have a crystal ball, but I can predict how much Colorado’s schools will change for the better with Elaine G. Berman as a member of the State Board of Education: Not a whit more than DPS improved under her command.

Kathy G. Hansen, Bailey

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

CU’s Brown a shill

What’s with all the shock and lamentation about the impending departure of University of Colorado President Hank Brown? He accomplished the mission for which he was appointed. As a shill for Referendum C’s horrendous tax hikes, Brown betrayed his avowed conservative ideals for a nice, fat $360,000-per-year job.
Now that CU is swimming in extra cash that should have been returned to the Colorado taxpayers, and the assurance of more funding hikes soon, the liberal higher education establishment no longer needs to put a phony conservative face on this disgraced institution.

Anthony J. Fabian, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

‘Swear not at all’

Note to those in North Carolina and elsewhere who insist that oaths must be taken on the Bible only (“Court to hear question of oaths using Quran,” National Briefing, Jan. 17): “But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God’s throne: Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King. Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black. But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.” (Matthew 5:34-37)
Jesus himself expressly forbids the swearing of oaths, yet you would have us swear with our hands on his very words.

Mary Morris, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Unlikely Dems will govern ‘responsibly’

Bill Ritter believes that we need to live up to our part of the social compact, “ ... the covenant that says government exists ... to ensure we take care of seniors, and the disabled, and for those who struggle mightily — whatever the reason.”
Whatever the reason? If I am struggling because I am lazy or stupid or lack ambition or drink too much or have just had an unfortunate life, is Ritter going to take care of me?
“Government has a responsibility ... to improve the quality of their lives.” No, it doesn’t. Government has a responsibility to protect our borders, maintain our infrastructure, enforce our laws and little else.
Ritter also wants to build a “more efficient, innovative government that is careful with your money ... ” How is he going to be more careful with our money when he is taking care of us all, whatever the reason? “We will govern well. We will govern to solve problems. We will govern responsibly.” I sincerely doubt it.

Mike Starr, Thornton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Saw it coming

Let me see if I have this right: We elect Ken Salazar to represent Coloradans, send him to Washington, and he delivers a speech inside the U.S. Capitol in Spanish? Quick, someone tell him he is an American, not a Mexican. He has to make up his mind which he is serving.
I knew this would happen if we elected him. I didn’t serve in the military most of my adult life so we could speak Spanish inside Congress. Bad enough he will not enforce our laws against his illegal immigrant friends. We will never vote Democratic again if they continue like this!

Patrick Cipolla, Estes Park

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (18) | TrackBack

Teacher didn’t care (I)

I am a former student of Speakout author W.L. Herrick (“North High teachers take fall for inert students, bureaucratic bog,” Jan. 13). In his column, Herrick said that we students “don’t care” about our education. Herrick is the one who didn’t care enough to stay. He didn’t teach us anything. All we did was watch movies, and he didn’t even explain why we were watching the movies.

Carlos Sanchez
Freshman, North High School

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Teacher didn't care (II)

I am a former student of Speakout author W.L. Herrick.
Herrick didn’t stop “more than a dozen fights in the first three weeks,” as he claims. He only stopped three fights, and one fight he watched without trying to break it up. Herrick uses a lot of big words in his column, just like he did in his freshman English class. All we learned last semester was that Herrick has a big vocabulary.
Mr. Herrick, I did try in your class. When it became clear that you didn’t care, that’s when I stopped trying. I learned one thing, actually. I learned that it’s OK to criticize students and insult them in the newspaper.

Juan Salazar
Freshman, North High School

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

January 24, 2007
Iran

It seems that one has to check global news sources in order to receive complete coverage these days. A Jan. 11, 2007 BBC headline, “U.S. Iraq raid draws Iranian anger,” states that U.S. forces have stormed a building in the northern Iraqi town of Irbil and seized six people said to be Iranians, prompting a diplomatic incident.
Officials said the building was an Iranian consulate and the detainees its employees, and that the troops raiding the building took away computers and papers. A local TV station said that Kurdish security forces had taken over the building after the Americans left.
The Pentagon denies that it was a government consulate. However, reports say the Iranian consulate was set up last year under an agreement with the Kurdish regional government to facilitate cross-border visits.
There have been previous incidents of this nature against Iranians in Iraq, but Thursday’s raid came as President Bush unveiled his new strategy in Iraq, which included increasing troop numbers to stop Iranian support for “our enemies in Iraq.”
It seems as though there’s an effort to provoke Iran who is involved with funding the Shiites. If President Bush incites Iran to attack us, then Congress will have a difficult time denying the authority for him to attack Iran directly. I hate to sound paranoid, but it’s hard not be when our government continues to manipulate us with fear while violating all international conventions.
Sharlene White
Colorado Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:16 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Snow

Ya know what??? We’ve been “dumped” on!!! We’ve had more snow in the last 2-3 weeks than we had all winter last year! And yes, everyone is sick of dealing with it, and is much more likely to lose their tempers at just about anything. So maybe, when you get in your car in the morning, take a minute and remind yourself that everyone is not going to be at their “best", and that you don’t have to respond in kind. How about more like, take a deep breath and keep your mouth shut. We don’t all have to perpetuate the anger and frustration.

D.A. Welch
Westminster

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:15 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Rocky redesign

The next time you consider downsizing, presumably to the Readers Digest size, don’t forget to publish the Rocky Large Type Edition. Size matters!

Murry Unell
Highlands Ranch

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:15 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Iraq war

It is appalling that, on the eve of the President’s State of the Union address, the Senate is calling for a resolution against the President’s plan in Iraq. It would seem that a resolution is needed to win the war in Iraq, but that is not the case. It is merely a slapdash effort to sabotage the war, and nothing less. The enemy is having no such debate. The Islamic fascists have one objective, and that is to win. We hope that the Congress will dash this defeatist resolution and get on with the President’s winning strategy. In essence, there is no alternative.

Brian Stuckey
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:14 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Climate change

I read the article previewing the report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change with interest. (Humans, warming tied, Latest research confirming dire predictions, Jan. 20) I am not one of those who believes that global warming is a hoax, but I do remain somewhat skeptical. NBC news ran a piece a couple of nights ago about scientists in the Antarctic, taking cores of the deep ice there. So far, the cores have shown at least eight separate major ice ages, (with intervening major periods of warming) all within recent geological time. Now there is a REAL “inconvenient truth.” The earth has undergone a great many periods of warming and cooling in its long history. These cycles are as natural as day and night. This is indisputable scientific fact.
What caused these previous periods of massive global warming and cooling? Perhaps prehistoric Republicans trashing the planet? Remarkably, your reporter failed to put the question to the scientists he interviewed. Until the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, with its 2,500 scientists, faces up to this genuine inconvenient truth and addresses it head on, I will remain a skeptic.

Richard A. Stacy
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:13 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

National Western

Today I sent the following email to the National Western:

Perhaps you can do something to get the place cleaned up. After all you are one of the major sponsors.
I recently traveled from my home in Utah to attend the draft horse events at the National Western. This is arguably one of the pre-eminent events for the draft horse. The display of horses and horsemanship was the most spectacular I have ever seen. You are to be congratulated on being able to attract such a wonderful event and to have such excellent participation, by such a high caliber of exhibitors. You would be right to proclaim that if you haven’t seen the draft horses at the National Western “you ain’t been nowhere and you ain’t seen nothin’.”
HOWEVER, why in the world can’t you clean the hall. The floors in the stands are filthy and that’s giving you the benefit of knowing that the facility had been used a lot in the last two weeks. It did not appear that any cleaning beyond basic emptying of the trash receptacles was done from day to day.
As a matter of fact it didn’t appear that the stands and the concourse had EVER been cleaned. A pressure washer at Costco is only about $150, and you could probably purchase it for much less. GET one or two or ten and use them.
Your show can’t stand another year without your cleaning the place up.
And oh the restrooms, that was another indignity that we visitors had to endure. Why no hot water during the show? And clean them hourly, if not at least daily. Install more dryers, install paper towels, fix them up and keep them clean.
Just because the show deals with farm animals, the hall doesn’t have to resemble a barn. Come to think of it, I’ve been in barns that are lots cleaner.

F. Scott Smith
Fruit Heights, Utah

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:13 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Democrats

Ah Yes!! The Democrats are in charge in Colorado! Lets see:
1. Because they are such poor loosers, my vote will be taken away from my candidate and be given to who ever gets the “popular” vote across the nation! Bet if the shoe was on the other foot this amendment would never see the light of day.
2. Despite the vote of the people of Colorado my tax dollars are to be given to “selected” abortion clinics to be used to kill 1 to 9 month old pre-birth babies.
3. UNIONS—the money behind/in front and on the sides of the Democrats will be allowed to have you fired if you do not give them your money! (armed robbery?) Unions are the largest and wealthiest “corporations” in America.
4. We will have State/Nation run Health Care! Heart attack anyone? Just wait your turn, someone with an ingrown toenail was here first! Been in a car accident with near death injuries? Oh well, someone ahead of you has a bloody nose. Don’t take my word for this, Check out England or closer, Canada.
Canadians come across to the U.S. for urgent Medical care daily.
5. Morels! Are being lowered to the bottom denominator under the cover of “Free Speech". Hate is the order of the day. You must hate anyone who does not follow their “superior” ideas.
6. Religion? No Christian or Jew will be allowed to voice their faith and Atheism is being made the National Religion.
DEMOCRATS —you’ve got to love ‘em!

Rita Shank
Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 03:12 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Illegal immigration

This is in response to a letter about how the Mexican Immigrants are keeping our economy alfoat. I am continually amazed that people fail to understand the definition of illegal. I have no problem with immigration, but come here legally, like many people have for generations. If you have to work to get legal status, then maybe you will appreciate what you have and want to be Americans. Wake up people, illegal is breaking our law.

Rick Piggott
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:10 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Many American citizens are wondering if Congressional legislators will assert their constitutional authority to declare war. Well, I think it’s about time for them to do so! Not only must Bush’s Iraqi escalation be challenged and emphatically rejected in Congress, U.S.
troops need to be removed from harm’s way by the end of 2007 (favored by 56% of Americans). Reps. Woolsey, Lee, and Waters have introduced a bill that would require U.S. withdrawal from Iraq within six months.
Legislators should not use a Bush veto threat as an excuse to hold back from pursuing an exit strategy.
We, as citizens, should express our outrage about this illegal war.
Contact Rep. Mark Udall (303-650-7820) and Sen. Ken Salazar (303-455-7600) to tell them to oppose further funding of the war in Iraq.
On Saturday, Jan. 27, at 12:00 noon in front of the Boulder County Courthouse between 13th and 14th on the Pearl St. Mall, there will be a rally and march sponsored by the Rocky Mt. Peace & Justice Center.
Dress warmly and bring your friends, family, and work colleagues to join hundreds of others to peacefully and energetically state, “Stop the war! Stop the funding! Bring our troops home!”

Kenneth Nova
Boulder

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:09 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Rocky redesign

Congratulations my dear Rocky Mountain News. I like the new design and format. Only one suggestion that I have wanted to make for years. As I got older (now 80) my eyesight became weaker and I thought it would serve the older generations if the size of type were increased from 9 pt. (I think) to lets say 12 or perhaps 14 pt. Now you would ask, how could we do that and get all the news in that is necessary and certainly we wouldn’t want to take away advertising space.
Well, I have a suggested solution to both of those problems. I find so much redundancy in every article that writers get carried away with their own self worth. Consider cutting 15% of each article and see how much space you have to enlarge the print size. You know, the Boomers are coming and getting older too and their vision will also diminish.
Now that I have said all of that, I suspect you wish I had just stayed with the congrats stuff and left the rest alone. Alas, I have to rely on getting my Rocky via the internet which is just great too.

Don Naeve
Murphy, Texas

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:09 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Paris Hilton

So Paris Hilton get caught DUI. Why bother stopping anyone famous when they do something wrong or illegal. They never do anything similar to that of an ordinary person. They just waste time and money going through the court system.

Leroy M. Martinez
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:03 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Voting by mail

In today’s RMN 3,500 ballots were sent to the wrong address. Anyone who wants to vote via the mail is a fool. Can’t trust the voting people to do via mail can’t trust voting people via machines. I always wanted to vote via internet. Use a pin number just like we do when we do our taxes. But I can’t trust the voting people either. How can we vote and know that our vote is counted.
Leroy M. Martinez
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:02 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Tom Tancredo

Mr Tancredo has no problem with sleeper cells operating in the US. He also has no problem with them raising money in the US to fund terrorist organizations overeas. His problem is those illegals who come here to work the jobs that nobody else will work. It sounds to me that just maybe Mr Tancredo had his lunch money taken away from him when he was in the 7th grade and has now declared war against all Hispanics because of this $.35 incident.

Leroy Martinez
Littleton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:02 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Iraq war

I’m rooting for the Iraqi resistance, as they fight for the righteous cause of expelling foreign military occupiers.
In doing so, I am hewing to long-held American values that were first developed during our historic armed insurgency against British rule.
People everywhere have a perfect right to resist foreign domination. That’s why this principle is properly embedded in our own Declaration of Independence and reiterated in International Law.
For this reason alone, the U.S. occupation of Iraq deserves to be vanquished.

Cord MacGuire
Boulder

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:01 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Gen. Casey says the added GIs ‘could’ be sent home this summer, if the Baghdad people ‘feel safe’ by then.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1107AP—Gates.html?source=mypi SAFE? NOT FOR LONG ! The insurgents and Sadrites, with this handy timetable, will just lie low for a few months, then rise to kill again.
I can’t believe that even the Bushies are that dumb. This is surely Bush’s way of backing down covertly on the ‘extra troops’ caper.
But this temporary surge is quite ruthless. Nothing will be accomplished, and the caper will be costly in dollars and casualties.
But so what ? It’s not Cheney’s millions; it’s not the Bushies’ children.
Dan Lyons
Fort Collins

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Election reform

Have our colorado congress people gone bonkers or is it that the majority is still vengeful over an election loss that occured seven years ago? I cannot believe the shortsighted vote to abolish the electoral college which effectively gives control of presidential elections to the major metropolitan areas (New York, Los Angeles , Chicago ,etc) and renders states like Colorado impotent on the national scene. The people of Colorado were bright enough to reject this idea at an earlier election. Stupid partisan legislative animosity does not serve Colorado. Revenge is a dish best eaten cold.

Robert Lipton
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:59 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Climate change

Dateline: Rome, A.D. 1633
Pope Urban VIII today blocked publication of Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems by Galileo Galilei, which discusses the theory that the Earth and other planets actually orbit the Sun. This heresy flies in the face of the known truth that all heavenly bodies orbit the Earth. Earth is the center of the universe since it is the home to all Mankind - the highest creation of the Divine Creator. For his failure to recant this heresy, Galileo Galilei has been imprisoned.
Dateline: Atlanta, 2007 C.E.
The Weather Channel’s Climate Expert, Dr. Heidi Cullen, PhD has recommended stripping television meteorologists of their American Meteorological Society (AMS) credentials if they do not subscribe to the inconvenient truth that global warming is not a normal, naturally occurring cyclical phenomenon, but that its predominant cause is mankind’s activity on the planet, and that global warming poses the greatest known threat to life on earth.
The best scientists test their own theories, rigorously trying to disprove them. It’s better to disprove yourself before publication than face the ridicule of your peers. Refusal to consider data which does not agree with one’s theories and beliefs, however popular, promotes bad science. This happened in 17th century astronomy and is happening today in climatology. Power and politics were at work then as now, as is anthropocentrism: The belief that natural phenomena must be caused by man since man is so important. Pope Urban’s and Dr. Cullen’s positions and pronouncements against discussion and dissent seem remarkably similar.

Glen Leinbach
Fort Collins

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:57 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Environmental legislation

As a member of Congressman Perlmutter’s 7th District, I offer him kudos for voting in favor of reducing some of the government’s oil and gas subsidies, being a bill co-sponsor, and speaking on the house floor in its support. As Jerry Taylor wrote in The National Review recently, “the case for the existing oil subsidies is ‘laughably thin.” Even more good news, the money saved will be shifted toward renewable energy. Thanks also to Mark Udall, John Salazar, & Diana DeGette for voting for this important legislation. Our delegation (for the most part) are on the right track!

Caroline N. Kamiyama
Edgewater

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:56 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

SUVs

Reporter Felix Doligosa Jr., in his piece on the two Berthoud teenage boys injured by another female driver in another car and not too sublety insinuates the incident occurred due to two SUV’s. The two SUV’s were made to be the evildoers of not only causing the boys to lose their legs but also making the female driver of the other car “another victim here.” Also we learn “female driver not injured.” Further demonizing our choice of autos the reporter states, “a Toyota Land Cruiser slammed into them, pinning them between the two SUV’s.” The reporter avoids the obvious that the female driver drove her auto into the two defensless and innocent young boys causing this terrible accident. Evil suv’s....please give me a break.

Richard Johnson
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:55 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Election reform

In its editorial of January 23, the Rocky states An elected clerk and recorder can choose a professional election director with relevant experience.
Should serious problems arise, the public knows who is responsible. But, that’s what we have now. The three officials who make up the Denver Election Commission (two elected, one appointed) are already being held responsible. The appointed clerk and recorder resigned and was replaced, and at least one of the two elected commissioners has chosen not to run again. Thus, Denver voters will have a chance to completely replace the current election commission without amending the city charter.
November’s election fiasco was a result of sloppy software and balky personnel, not the election commission structure itself. The same result could easily have happened under an elected clerk and recorder and his/her appointed election director.
Denver’s clerk and recorder has enough duties already. Duties that occupy his/her time to the fullest. S/he doesn’t need more added to his/her plate.
Denver’s current structure has worked fine for decades. Vote No on amendment 1A.

Peter Gross
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:55 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Environmental legislation

I am writing to express my appreciation for Congressman Perlmutter’s endorsement of the recent House bill on oil subsidies. The bill, part of the first 100 hours of the new Congress, will remove billions of dollars in tax breaks for the oil industry and collect royalties on federal land use for off-shore drilling previously lost through loopholes in land leases. Essentially, the purpose is to reduce government subsidies of record-breaking oil profits and re-allocate the money to research and development for alternative energy sources. Alternative energy is the best avenue for the U.S. Government to help reverse climate change through reduced carbon emissions and to decrease U.S. dependence on foreign oil. I applaud Congressman Perlmutter for recognizing the crucial importance of these two issues, which affect our environment, economy, and international relations. Not only did he vote for the bill, he also co-sponsored it and spoke in favor of it on the floor of the House. Thanks also to Mark Udall, John Salazar, and Diana DeGette for supporting the bill. I am pleased to see Representatives from Colorado speaking out and acting on the critical matter of how our country will responsibly meet energy needs, now and in the future.

Tristan Gorman
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:54 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Animal cruelty

I WOULD LIKE TO THANK ALL OF THE ANIMAL CONTROL DIVISIONS IN THE STATE OF COLORADO.
THANK YOU FOR BEING THE VOICES TO THE NEGLECTED, ABUSED, AND FORGOTTEN ANIMALS WHO ARE UNABLE TO SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.
THANK YOU TO THE CONSUMERS WHO CARE ENOUGH TO CALL AND MAKE REPORTS OF NEGLECT, ABUSE, AND ABANDOMENT.
THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR HARD WORK, DEDICATION AND LOYALTY TO FOLLOW UP ON THESE COMPLAINTS. AND A BIG THANK YOU FOR CHARGING THESE OWNERS WHO ARE ARROGANT AND IGNORANT AND WHO SHOULD NOT OWN PET WITH ISSUING THEM CITATIONS.
THANK YOU TO THE MANY ANIMAL ADVOCATES AND THE ANIMAL CONTROL DIVISIONS FOR BEING THEIR VOICE AND “GUARDIAN ANGELS.”
MY DEEPEST THANKS TO ALL OF YOU.

Irene Galicia
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:53 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Strange times

Strange times: Civil rights icons honored by a country who once vilified them-MLK actually being quoted by our current president and a person refusing to give up her seat on a bus honored in a state funeral. Two thirds of the American people now concerned about a foolish, deadly war that we never should have gotten into in the first place. Now CEOs calling for action on climate change. Even the President seems concerned. Very strange times.
I suggest we save ourselves a lot of aggravation and perhaps some money down the road. When someone from the loony left brings up a concern next time (war, environment, human rights, etc.) perhaps we should consider listening. Look at the environmental concerns we’re facing. I remember watching a group of crazy high school teachers walking to school on the first Earth Day back in 1970. Now 37-years later, some are suddenly discovering that “Houston, we have a problem". The problem is those who have laughed it off probably won’t be around long enough to experience what may happen with the environment or its potential impact on our health and economy. By the time this happens, these folks will probably have passed away. However, their children and grandchildren will unfortunately feel the pain of 37-years of ridiculing this a growing threat.
Perhaps if we try listening and thinking about an issue rather than blowing it off because the messenger appears to be part of a political faction we disagree with, our children might not be facing some of the issues we have today. Now I see why so many are opposed to cloning; we’re afraid future generations will clone us for the purpose of kicking our butts for leaving them with this mess.

Guy Gainsforth
Larkspur

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:52 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

John Temple

Here’s a nicely done grammatical gaffe in John Temple’s explanatory note to Rocky readers regarding the paper’s new format change: “I know this might sound strange, but after going through all the work to get us to this day, I hope the Rocky this morning feels familiar, comfortable. But fresh and exciting at the same time, the way a new cell phone or iPod might feel.” Work on your sentence frags, John!

R M G Fransson
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:51 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Voting

Normally I am found harping on people for not voting, believing it to be one of the most important rights the founders ever identified. We vote for/against specific things and our elected representatives act in line with these votes. I’m not referring to media interpreted votes.
However, after reading today that “The Colorado Senate approved a bill that would give Colorado’s electoral votes - and those of several other states - to the Presidential candidate who carries the national popular vote, regardless of who Colorado voters preferred,” I’ve finally come to the conclusion why vote at all?
It’s a basic question? Why vote at all when in 2004 we voted against the California money and voted down Amendment 36 only to have the democrat controlled Senate end run us? Why vote for enforcing illegal alien laws when sanctuary cities end run us and offer illegal protections or won’t enforce the law? Result on this one? DA’s who won’t do their jobs get elected governor. Why vote for TABOR laws when money grubbing politicians and special interest groups end run us in the State House and in city councils? There are plenty of other examples, but these will do.
It’s a basic question. Why vote at all?

Steve Clayton
Colorado Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:51 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Middle East

With Israel and the Zionist-dominated U.S., under the umbrella of the world money powers, gearing up to destroy Iran via the use of nuclear weapons, it should be made known to the world of yet another fabrication as an excuse for war.
“Across the world, a dangerous rumor has spread that could have catastrophic implications. According to legend, Iran’s President has threatened to destroy Israel, or, to quote the misquote, ‘Israel must be wiped off the map.’ Contrary to popular belief, this statement was never made, as this article will prove.”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=NOR20070120&articleId=4527 by Arash Norouzi. The words “map,” “wipe out” or “Israel” were never uttered.
On October 25th, 2005, President Ahmadinejad, delivered a speech at a program titled “The World Without Zionism.”
“In his speech, Ahmadinejad declares that Zionism is the West’s apparatus of political oppression against Muslims. He says the ‘Zionist regime’ was imposed on the Islamic world as a strategic bridgehead to ensure domination of the region and its assets.
Palestine, he insists, is the frontline of the Islamic world’s struggle with American hegemony, and its fate will have repercussions for the entire Middle East.”
“He concludes by referring to [the late Ayatollah] Khomeini’s unfulfilled wish: ‘The Imam said this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time. This statement is very wise.’ This is the passage that has been isolated, twisted and distorted so famously. By measure of comparison, Ahmadinejad would seem to be calling for regime change, not war.”
You would do well to spread this message far and wide to possibly avert more psychpathic insanity from those evil murderers who are working overtime to enslave humanity in their “New World Order.”

Steve Campbell
Glenwood Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:50 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Forests

OK, I finally have it in writing. “The idea behind creating a system of national forests was to put these lands under public ownership, protected from private exploitation and managed in the public interest". After a hundred years exploitation still rules!
Yearly cities and ski areas push their way ever further onto land that should be forest. They say it’s to raise money to pay to run the rest on the forest. With this short sighted mentality we will eventually rent all forests to pay for the bureaucracies that run them and have no forest left. Surely “It can’t happen here". Big money ski areas and their lawyers are now “In charge” of our forests with their only goal being growth. Arapahoe Basin and Wolf Creek being our latest debacles.
The USFS must immediatly stop the loss of forests and get back to the intent of the law that created it. No amount of money can replace a forest. We must stop the (To borrow from an old and dear song that is too easily quoted in Colorado these days) “Taking of paradise, putting up a parking lot” or city or more and bigger ski areas or private rivers etc. etc.

Randy Brown
Greeley

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:45 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Animal cruelty

Boulder’s The Kitchen should be applauded for its emphasis on the importance of sustainable agriculture (Green never tasted so good,” January 20).
More and more restaurant-goers are seeking out dining establishments that make socially responsible purchasing decisions. They have ample reason to oppose the confinement of pigs and calves raised for veal in crates so restrictive, the animals cannot even turn around for their entire lives. Consumers are also rightfully concerned about factory farms cramming egg-laying hens in tiny cages that prevent them from spreading their wings or walking.
Other restaurants should follow The Kitchen’s lead by leaving animal factory farm products off their menus. For more information, readers can visit HumaneEating.com.

Alyson Bodai
The Humane Society of the United States
Washington, D.C.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:44 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Plea bargains

Read in the paper today about another “plea-bargain” guy, Derrick Johnson “suspect in blaze has violent past” This guys 23 years old and this is his “record” 4/6/2001 First degree sexual assault 1/30/2002 Assault, robbery, child cruelty, harrassment 12/12/2002 Unlawful distribution of controlled substance 1/28/2004 Failure to register as a sex offender 2/26/2004 Failure to appear, violation of bond 6/20/2004 Failure to appear, failure toregister as a sex offender (didn’t we do this before?) 10/21/2004 Trespassing,assault, domestic abuse, violence, child abuse, harrassment, criminal mischief 4/24/2005 Possession of a dangerous weapon, criminal trespass, driving without insurance 6/16/2005 Aggravated robbery (weapon used, probably gun) felony menacing 7/24/2005 Assault, domestic violence 12/3/2005 Burglary, assault 3/6/2006 Burglary, theft 1/16/2007 Assault, felony menacing And finally on January 18, 2007 FIRST DEGREE MURDER This guy was still walking around after being arrested many many times for felony charges and the list goes on and on and yet HE IS NOT IN JAIL!!
Are you plea-bargaining, probation-giving, coddlers beginning to get the message????
You stink at your jobs,

Terry Bellomo, Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:43 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Hold students, parents accountable

I want to commend the Rocky Mountain News for finally printing the truth about (public) education. As a teacher, reading W.L. Herrick’s Speakout column of Jan. 13, “North High teachers take fall for inert students, bureaucratic bog,” almost brought tears to my eyes for describing the uphill battle educators face.
Yes, teachers have their responsibilities. However, they cannot be held accountable for students not fulfilling theirs and for parents who do not ensure that their children do so (from homework and assignment completion to following school rules and procedures).
What is remarkable to me is that it used to be if you failed in obtaining your education, it was your own fault. Now, if you fail, you can blame it on the schools. Yes, some schools are bad. Yes, there are poor teachers. However, the great majority of schools and the staff members working in them are dedicated, hard- working people. Education of any type only works when that effort and dedication are matched by the students and communities they serve.
Until the government figures out ways to hold students and parents accountable, the battle we face will only get harder.

Earl “Chip” MacEnulty II
Colorado Springs

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Falling oil prices? We must have a probe!

The price of crude oil is plunging. How can that be? Predictions are it will drop to $40 per barrel before it levels off.
I demand those economic geniuses in the Senate investigate this conspiracy by the oil companies to lower the price of crude oil! How can consumers pay less for gas and heating oil? Won’t that deprive the oil companies of their windfall profits? How will we explain this to our children? Again the oil companies have outmaneuvered our vigilant legislators. Despicable!
I also demand the Senate investigate the price of coffee at Starbucks and the cost of bottled water. These companies are reaping outrageous profits. Surely crusaders like Sens. Patrick Leahy and Charles Schumer will see the need to put these CEOs on the hot seat. No self-respecting crusading senator can pass up an opportunity to capture that kind of public attention.

Ron Perkins, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

MLK marade takes a disappointing turn

On Jan. 15, as I have done in past years, I marched in Denver’s Martin Luther King Jr. marade (march/parade).
As usual, the marade started with prayers from local religious leaders. After the prayers, the crowd stood anticipating a motivational speech by some local leader or inspirational speaker, but instead they got Kaiser Permanente and State Farm Insurance talking about how great they are for sponsoring the event.
This new element to this yearly tradition is certainly disappointing. I’m hoping enough people will speak out about the apparent hypocrisy and we can get back to the true meaning of this day. It seems that corporations are taking over, and until the people of this country unite in moving away from this domination by not feeding it with our wallets, we are doomed. And we, our dreams, our inspirations, and our deepest desires for peace and love are for sale.

Andee Miller, Louisville

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Enough with MLK

The Rocky Mountain News article of Jan. 16, “Most firms stay open on holiday” (Business), pretty much tells how many people feel about the massive coverage the paper gives to Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday.
How many more years are we going to have to see the canonization of King? This country has honored the greatness of this man for the past 40-plus years, but do we have to pay tribute to him with such outlandish fanfare for rest of our lives? Granted, King accomplished much in his lifetime toward racial tolerance; more than this country did in the hundred years before him. But, really, enough is enough.

Robert Johnson, Highlands Ranch

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

A viable renewable: do it with mirrors

In their Dec. 30 Commentary article, “Power gridlock, Ray Gifford and Adam Peters asserted that “no renewable resources will provide for the large ‘base load’ resources that Colorado needs the most. They go on to conclude that we must make a Faustian bargain with either coal or nuclear energy to satisfy our appetite for electricity. Unfortunately, both authors appear to be unaware of concentrating solar power as a renewable means of generating base-load power.
CSP operates by focusing the sun’s energy with mirrors to create steam from which electricity is generated. Because CSP can easily store energy, the power keeps coming even when the sun sets or there is cloud cover.
The National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden determined that the solar resources in the San Luis Valley alone would allow more than 600,000 gigawatt-hours of electricity to be generated using CSP — or about 13 times the amount we use in the entire state. Furthermore, CSP can produce power at costs competitive with polluting sources.

J. Thomas McKinnon, Boulder

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Energy alternatives must be marketable

Alternative sources of energy, such as wind and solar, will benefit Colorado only if they develop as a free-market alternative to conventional fuels. If development is forced by legislation or by plebiscite, it will be a disaster.
Wind and solar are now the most politically popular alternatives as they are viewed as nonpolluting and nondepleting. What is not considered are issues of peak-period energy production, energy storage, energy transmission to the consumer and visual pollution.
Homeowners who want to get “off the grid” will spend tens of thousands of dollars to equip their homes with systems that will require constant maintenance and will probably never pay out. Tax credits are the false reason that these systems appear now to be desirable.
We should realize that in order to meet our growing demand for energy, all sources should be encouraged on an equal economic footing, including the development of safe nuclear plants.

Bill Richardson, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

What's happened?

Time to put Colorado to the front of the class as far as disgusting, putrid behavior goes: child abuse, violent crime, unbelievable practices by the public school systems, including colleges and universities.
What has happened to my ol’ home state of 42 years? All in the name of being “progressive. Yuck! Glad to be gone.
The punk thugs who killed Denver Broncos cornerback Darrent Williams should fry for their cowardly drive-by attack. Do any of these guys know how to pick a fair fistfight anymore? Catch them, prove it, sentence them, do them.
Colorado, you don’t realize the amount of disgusting national news coming out of your state until you are away a few years.

Gregory Haas, Billings, Mont.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Defund the war

Whatever it takes to end this nonsense, I’m for it. If it takes defunding, so be it.
Please note that by defunding I mean defunding the war, not defunding the troops and not defunding reparations to the Iraqi people for damage done. The solution is political, not military.

Eric Hartman, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

January 23, 2007
President Bush

Democracy is a government of, by and for the people; formerly, in America; composed of three (3) seperate but equal factions representing the masses.

Bush Democracy: (concerning Iraq War) "...I don't care what they (Congress, American People) think, I've made up my mind..."
(concerning human rights) "...I'll be the one who defines torture..."

(concerning the Constitution) "...no rights for anyone I define as a terrorist..."

(fiscal irresponsibility) "...You give all the money and tax breaks to the ones at the top, and they'll tinkle down on those at the bottom..."

(ibid) Due to an unfunded preemtive war and tax cuts, Social Security for the masses is now calculated to run out sooner than when we took office.

Bush: Despot, Tyranny, Dictatorship. Resultant: Impeach for high crimes.

Michael C. Zink
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:12 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

North High teacher

I am writing in response to Mr. Herrick's Jan. 13 letter to the editor about the "nightmarish," "harrowing" experience he had at North High School. I am one of his former students. I don't understand how he could call us lazy when he had us watching movies instead of doing work the whole semester. Also, he says he broke up over a dozen fights. To be honest, he broke up no more than three. He also witnessed another fight and did nothing to break it up. It makes me made that he said we don't care when he didn't take the time to find out how much we did care. If this school is so bad, why did he stay here for the whole semester? Why didn't he bail on us sooner? We never once talked about dropping out, like Mr. Herrick said. If we wanted to drop out, why were we coming to his class in the first place?

Alyssa Wiggins
Student, North High School

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:12 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Cancer drug

I recently read an article about cancer research in Canada led by Evangelos Michelakis of the University of Alberta. He has shown that a simple drug called dichloroacetate (DCA) that has been used for years to treat people with mitochondrial disease could cure most types of cancer. When Michelakis tested the drug on cancer cells in culture, they died. When he gave it to rats with human tumors, the tumors shrank. It does not appear to affect normal cells, has no side effects, and should work on all cancers. However, since it is an old drug and extremely inexpensive to produce, it cannot be patented. That's because pharmaceutical companies are not likely to fund costly clinical trials with DCA because they won't be able to make a big profit. Many drugs for diseases haven't been produced for this reason, especially those that affect poor people in developing countries. It's a shame that pharmaceutical companies have so much power and are able to profit at the expense of our health and our lives. Michelakis is trying to get private funding for clinical trials, but the drug companies will probably scurry to find patentable compounds with a similar action to DCA and if any of these reach the market, they will be grossly overpriced. I think it would be an outrageous scandal to have such a cheap alternative with such amazing potential not given a chance simply because it won't turn a big enough profit for the drug companies.

Sharlene White
Colorado Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:11 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Fraud

Okay, the FBI, CIA and Pentagon can call your bank and get the bank's records about you if the bank wants to cooperate. Of course, so can a local used car lot. Come to think of it, so can all the employees of the bank, the Federal Reserve, the IRS, and probably the Colorado Department of Revenue Collections department. I wonder what Drug Enforcement Administration agents can get without a warrant?

And anyone who is smart enough to lie over the phone can probably get a fair amount of information.

Checks and credit card transactions are public information. That is why the government makes it illegal to use cash for any transaction over $10,000 without filling out a form and sending it to the Treasury Department. These are old laws.

Yaakov Watkins
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:10 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Illegal immigration

I have withheld peoples names from the following account to give the hurting families some privacy.

Around December 30, I met a very brave and interesting man. His family has lived in what is now Colorado for around 250 years. He had been a very enterprising small business owner with several employees. He and his family are proud, hard working citizens who have lived the American dream. Then one day, a bar near Ft. Lupton served a 16 year old boy enough liquor to raise his blood alcohol level above 0.3. That 16 year old boy, later drove his uninsured vehicle into the side of a two ton truck, rolling it and injuring several people in both vehicles, and devastating many families. That DUI 16 year old, an illegal alien. is now 19 and still free as a bird.

The driver of the two ton truck, the small business owner, was blinded. While undergoing two cornea transplant operations, and recovering, he gradually lost his business to pay his medical bills.

a. As he lost his business, his employees lost their jobs, impacting several more families.

b. His mortgage company could have re-financed his home loan, but instead foreclosed on his home, destroying his excellent credit rating.

c. His insurance company at first refused to pay for his new prescription lenses, obviously needed for his "new" eyes. They finally relented, but then refused to pay for the frames - expensive for him, but pocket change compared to the cost of two eye surgeries. If this tragedy had not happened just a couple weeks before "no-fault" insurance ended in Colorado, he would have been further victimized by the insurance industry.

This former small business owner is apparently the same national origin and ethnic heritage as the DUI teen that ruined his life. He is no fan of illegal immigrants wherever they're from. Without justice, our country is broken.

James Wade
Loveland

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:10 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Mike Rosen

Regarding Rosen’s article, Populists Equalize Poverty, Jan. 20, does it ever occur to Rosen how pat and cowardly his defense of the rich and the capitalists is? If the poor and the masses, as he derisively terms them, take power, so what, they take power. By his own writing, it’s "relative." What Rosen and his kind really insist on is that power stays in realm of the rich. Period. Power is okay as long as it is held by a minority that somehow, it goes against ——— for the majority to have power. And yet, that is exactly what we are supposed to have, and do have, under our Constitution.

Rosen tries desperately to write that he is only referring to economics, yet he first quotes de Tocqueville, that "there exists in the human heart a depraved taste for equality," which Rosen uses to justify the world, and then Durant, who claims power influences economics. Under the rush of these two "giants," Rosen can’t help himself and so brings government into his argument by stating, incredibly, that "the U.S. government [HAS]long been in the business of redistributing income through progressive taxation; on the one hand, and transfer payments to the poor and middle class." Does the public understand through this chaotic nonsense what Rosen really sees? Anything collective is evil, e.g. government, and for him we are made up simply of "winners and losers." Then it’s always labor unions to blame; as when "they don’t like the results they meddle in people’s lives and business." Of course, business never meddles; but what about corporate welfare, corporate lobbyists, and the hundreds of millions for business politicians in campaign contributions?

I think what really fuels Rosen’s nonsense is a fear that the people, under the U.S. Constitution, will realize their legitimate potential, and he might not like the consequences.

Kenneth Valero
Littleton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:09 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Frightening

Some years ago an intelligent man said that the only people who could conquer our country are our own citizens.
With the present situations in our county I find myself quite insecure and frightened. During WWII I would have felt quite uncomfortable if a person with a German or Japaneese name were in a position of power here. Now we have a man, Barack Obama, with the name of the Arabic people we are at war with, and two vicious, sociopathic women, Pelosi and Clinton in positions of power.
I shudder.
Richard Taylor
Littleton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:08 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Iraq

Rev. David Williams, pastor of the local Abyssinian Christian Church, spoke at Lincoln Center on 1/14/07, at a memorial service for Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The bulk of his remarks, which was much appreciated with sustained applause by the audience, was to very movingly point out the opposition by Dr. King to the Vietnam War — which opposition should be repeated today by all Americans concerning President Bush’s ill-conceived policies in the current Iraq War. And that the failure to oppose the wars, then and now, was and is based on the title, “Silence Is Betrayal.” Why did the report in The Coloradoan, the next day, unfortunately, completely ignore these remarks? Aren’t the deaths of 3,000 American troops and 650,000 Iraqi civilians, and the wounding of many, many thousands more, enough by now? Why do so many victims come from largely minority and lower income classes? If there are any doubts as to the likely responses to these questions, why not ask the relatives of the dead and wounded for their opinions?
Joe Stern
Fort Collins

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:07 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Spanish “pre-buttal”

In defending the Democrats’ decision to ask Senator Ken Salazar to deliver a “pre-buttal” to President Bush’s State of the Union speech in Spanish, Senator Salazar says the speech is a way of respecting the country’s diversity.
It’s more than that. It is one phase in a staged bifurcation of the nation: “In the late twentieth century, developments occurred that, if continued, could change America into a culturally bifurcated Anglo-Hispanic society with two national languages . . . The driving force behind the trend toward cultural bifurcation . . . has been immigration from Latin America and especially from Mexico.” “Mexican immigration is leading toward the demographic ‘ reconquista’ of areas Americans took from Mexico by force in the 1830s and 1840s . . . Along with immigration from other Latin American countries, it is advancing Hispanization throughout America and social, linguistic, and economic practices appropriate for an Anglo-Hispanic society. ("Who Are We? The Challenge to America’s Identity” by Samuel P. Huntington, 2004) Whether one considers these developments desirable or not, the undemocratic character of this transformation should challenge every one. Narrow —- mainly commercial and elite —- interests are driving this change against the popular will.
Soon enough, it will be a fait accompli.
We will then be urged to be “realistic,” accept the loss of the historic American nation and embrace diversity, open borders and a North American Union.
It’s utopian folly but it may be unstoppable.
Tom Shuford
Lenoir, N.C.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:07 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Disabled & snow

Thank you so much for printing Ms Beck-Massey’s letter regarding the city’s disregard for the disabled. As a bus rider I have had to stand on 3 foot tall blocks of ice to wait for a bus-like a lone penguin. Impossible for someone with special mobility needs. I have not seen an elderly person nor a wheelchair on my bus for a month. Shame on the city of Denver for forcing such a large number of the population to be housebound.
I was able to assist a blind man this week who had made a wrong turn and was trying to walk through 12 inch deep ruts of slush and ice. No one stopped to ask if we needed help. No one slowed down as they continued to race through the empty lot. No one apoligized for throwing slush on us. I had to watch his feet-my feet- and his dog’s feet as we made our way to Evans. One man found our situation most amusing as he cruised by in his SUV. Ms Beck-Massey is right-In a dire situation-Denver would most certainly fail, at least for the disabled-the poor and the elderly.
M.J. Shelton
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:06 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Illegal immigrants

I can only hope and pray that Colorado can do a better job at this invasion fron Mexico than Texas has. For the past 25 years my family and I make the trip to Estes Park and Colorado Springs for our vacation. And while in Estes Park We noticed a disturbing observation: illeagals (not to be racist i am hispanic myself) just sitting around the dairy queen making jeering looks and bulling attitudes (I know and understand that this is an isolated indivudals attitude and doesn’t represent EVERYONE of brown skin color or ALL who legally or illeagally cross our borders but the point is made). I almost felt like I was back in Dallas Tx. To be honest with you the main reason we go up there is to try to escape all that here in Dallas. Now the gangs from Mexico has targeted our once sacred sanctionary. I guess I’ll let all my friends and family from Dallas know the Colorado is no longer an option for us.
Thank You nad God Bless You in your efforts.
Leroy Sanchez
Dallas

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:05 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

HPV vaccine

For those of you who have bemoaned the patriot act, take a look at what your state is trying to do. It seems we now have the smoke police, the helmet police, the proposed cell phone police, the seat belt police, in NYC they now have the food police. and now Colorado wants the anti cancer police. The state wants to pass a law requiring teen age girls to have and HPV shot unless their parents decide against it. A teenage girl can obtain an abortion without the parents consent why can’t she turn down medication?
We have a group of legislators who insist on passing this feel good legislation that infringes on our rights. Ken Gordon the clown prince of the Colorado state senate has co sponsored a bill to eliminate smoking in casino venues. Gordon who ran a dismal campaign for secretary of state apparently wants to leave a legacy. His campaign incidentally was not taken seriously by many.
Having spent eighteen years working in an Atlantic City casino I can tell you, you will lose a lot of casino business if Gordon’s bill passes. I quit smoking cigarettes forty years ago, I do enjoy an occasional cigar. Should this legislation pass I will not enter a Colorado casino. If the smoke bothers some employees then I suggest they seek other employment.
I ask you what is next, the thought police and double speak as in Orwell’s 1984? Wake up folks the Patriot Act protects us from terrorists. All of this feel good legislation is designed to protect us from ourselves, how funny is that?
Ed Saltzman
Grand Lake

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:05 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Gangs

It appears to me that the RMN has done a disservice to its’ readers by using alarmist journalism to sell newspapers ("SPECIAL REPORT: GANGS IN COLORADO,” RMN, Jan.20, 2007). By just listing the number of gang members without qualifying that number your headline could read, “Gang members outnumber police 8 to 1 in Denver!” I’m sure RMN reporter Sara Burnett must have asked how many of these gang members are active and someone higher up decided it was not relevant to the story and didn’t want to confuse the reading public with the facts.
As you know, because we discussed this problem in the late 1980’s when these violent gangs first appeared in Denver, only a small percentage of this number are active, hard-core gang members. The remainder are peripheral or that part of gang number statistics that does not reflect the inconsistencies of collecting the data; purging delays. duplicity, degree of involvement, transient population, erroneous data collection, incarcerated, for instance.
I do not intend to minimize the danger and costs gangs impose on society, but to combat their aggressiveness communities and the police must have accurate numbers. They must understand degrees of involvement so that they may direct the appropriate levels of resources to the appropriate levels of involvement (isolate and incarcerate hard core, treat peripherals).
I think the police and communities know this, now let your readers have all the facts.
David O’Shea-Dawkins
Denver (Retired Denver P.D. Sgt.)

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:04 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Renewable energy

ADVANCING RENEWABLES?
Unreported in the RMN is a major stumbling block in advancing renewable resource energy. From The Fort Collins Coloradoan’s 1/17/07 article, Ritter, Democrats outline renewable-energy economy plan, was a hint regarding the Personal Property Tax’s (PPT) impact on renewable developments, 17 Jan 2007. PPT is serious issue for turbine operators. The newer machines’ cost of installation and infrastructure is about $3.5M each. Approximately $2M is the nacelle (cabin on top) and its rotor, directional system, shaft, bearings, gear box, generator(s), transformer and various required parts plus the meter, switches, wiring, elevator, hoist, etc; all usually called personal property. Tax at the usual rate is a heavy burden, offsetting some of the renewable, generated production. What better incentive would there be for immediate development of the community and state economy than to strongly or completely reduce this burden on a industry trying to get significantly started in Colorado?
Jim Newcomb
Fort Collins

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:03 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Electoral votes

Guaranteed trivialization of our great state of Colorado. The Rocky reported, on January 18th, buried on page 14A: “Lawmakers tentatively approved a measure that would set up a deal with other states in presidential election years to give all the state’s electoral votes to the winner of the nationwide popular vote.”
Although our nine electoral votes are not many, they are a vital bargaining chip forcing national decision-makers to pay attention to our state’s needs. If we give those votes away to the voters of other states, those national authorities have absolutely no reason to pay any attention to the citizens of Colorado. Do we want the voters of Texas, California, Florida and New York to decide how our electoral votes are cast?
The Electoral College was established to protect the less populous states. This idea to give our votes away probably results from the disappointment of some in the last election, but that emotional overreaction is not sufficient reason to surrender practices that protect Colorado’s citizens.
As a terrible idea, giving Colorado’s electoral votes away to more populous states would rank with President Bush’s naming Donald Rumsfeld as his Secretary of Defense. To those who advocate this radical surgery: The Law of Unintended Consequences may prove this despicable action to be a sword that cuts both ways.
If this proposal passes the Legislature, let’s hope that Governor Ritter has the courage and common sense to veto it.
Finally, a note to Denver’s newspapers: One sentence low on page 14 is absolutely inadequate coverage of a story of this importance. This vital topic needs more sunlight.
Thomas E. Mullins
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Snow removal

Having landed the Democratic Convention may protect Mayor Hickenlooper from the consequences Mayor McNichols paid for mismanaging snow removal. After all, we should be glad it will not be the Republican convention, as we will be spared demonstrations, riots, vandalism, “vomit-ins” etc. on the part of the morally superior. But it is somehow amazing that areas such as the streets around the south end of the DU campus still resemable Antarcticaj, complete with deep water and crevasses,while quiet streets of single family homes are being laboriously cleared. I requested that the section of Ogden that is the primary parking access for the 350-400 residents of Country Club Towers and Gardens be made passable for normal sized vehicles three different times and three different ways. I was informed that the situation had been handled—in a paraliel uniiverse, perhaps. The ice is still there. Perhaps the good mayor could be inveighed upon to give the local population of able-bodied homeless males shovels rather than real estate.
Joseph Meyer
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:58 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

City employee

Denver has always had the best government that money can buy but but this is beyond even what seems normal for boulder and C.U. The you’ve got to be kidding meter is smoking. “former city clerk near job” 1/18/07 he should be near tar and feathers.
Call me crazy but isn’t there a thing like job performance and qualifications and past results in the process? Doesn’t resigning after all youknowwhat broke loose at election time before anybody could find a decent rail to run him outa town on raise a red flag or two, should raise flares. Me being just joe shmoe working guy,first thought I have is This guys got some really good dirt on somebody way up in the foodchain or the people about to hire him are friggin idiots. I suspect mayor Hickenlooper had Sue Cobb say he would be “a good fit” because the employment law department isn’t screwed-up to his expectations and six months of paying Wayne Vaden $150.00 an hour to consult is cheaper than hiring somebody who may actually get results. the taxpayers will get the “good fit” . If Mr. Vador “works” six months-1040 hours, that’s $156,000.00 they should feel “consulted’” allready. So,children of Denver, lesson learned-to double your income, first completely fail, resign to avoid what you have coming to you and never forget the Colorado Motto “No Lawyer Left Behind !
Tim McKee
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:57 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Unions

House Bill 1072 to repeal the Colorado Labor Peace Act is long overdue. This grossly unfair law was enacted in the 1940s for one purpose: to subvert the right of workers to organize unions. I know of no other state where 75% of those casting a ballot is the requirement to vote a union shop in, but only 50% plus one to vote it out. That is the net effect of the Labor Peace Act.
I wonder how the proponents of the Labor Peace Act (and right-to-work laws) would like to have the tenets of “open shop” unionism applied to all professions. Here is how it would work: 1) An attorney is retained to represent a group of consumers in a product liability case. He is required to represent ALL of them, but they can each decide for themselves whether or not to pay him, and he must provide equal representation for the payers and non-payers alike. 2) A homeowners association is responsible for maintenance of the pool and community center in a neighborhood. Each individual homeowner decides whether or not to pay their dues to the association, and they cannot be denied use of the pool and community center for nonpayment.
This is America, home of democracy and majority rule. Majority means 50% plus one. HB 1072 seeks to bring about exactly that in the workplace.
Tom McIntosh
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:57 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Rocky coverage

Jim Sheeler and Chris Schneider deserve commendation for the series of articles they wrote and photographed about the military bringing Navy medic Christopher Anderson’s body home from Philadelphia and his final burial at Arlington Cemetery. They both thoughtfully and sensitively shared with us the grief of his family as well as the pain they felt in deciding what to do with his belongings sent home from Iraq.
I read about our soldiers’ deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan every day, but reading one family’s story of dealing with their grief was overwhelming and heartbreaking. Thank you so much for printing this story.
Marilyn Mattson
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:56 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Space pollution

Now that we pollute the planet, China has destroyed a satellite and many pieces of debris. So has the USA with their own satellites. We are going to pollute space. What happens when all that debris fall to Earth..Today we must start taking care of our planet and space. This is the only place we have.
Leroy M. Martinez
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:55 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Snow removal

The City and County of Denver has issued 1 thousand tickets for people that do not or cannot clean their sidewalks. I say that we issue these same tickets back to the City of Denver for not cleaning their streets. Several people have already paid fines. They should be refunded that money. Don’t even talk about the damadge to their cars.
Leroy M. Martinez
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:55 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Charles Krauthammer

Chas.Krauthammer (22Jan) suggests we should pull our troops back into friendly Kurdland,and let civil war prevail in Baghdad.
He doesn’t note that this ‘Plan B’ would hand our half-billion dollar ‘GreenZone’embassy over to the Shia who will end up ruling Baghdad.
He doesn’t even note the most likely change, plan ‘C’, which would short-circuit the civil war: facilitate the split into Kurdland, Shialand, and SunniArabLand. US should protect convoys of refugees to make the ethnic cleansing (already ongoing) involve as little bloodshed as possible.
Why do these neocon hawks ignore the ‘split’ possibility advocated by Sen.Biden? Because they can’t stand the thought of an independent, oil-rich Shia ministate possibly allied with the Shia Iran they hate.
But this ministate will inevitably be instituted, when Shia give up the dream of controlling all of Arab Iraq.
Dan Lyons
Fort Collins

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:54 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Climate change

As California and its fruits and nuts go through the deep freeze, hopefully the global warming mind set will be nominally mollified. A man on the Alaska pipeline told me about a 1200 foot core sample taken through the ice on the north shore of Alaska.
When they got through the ice, they brought up of all things - ferns! Global climate change has been going on for a long time before man ever came on the scene. It certainly is the epitome and height of arrogance to think that man can have any effect on the weather. Yes, concrete and asphalt, when in high concentrations, can absorb more solar heat that tundra and dirt. The percentage of surface area covered with man made materials is infinitesimal.
Meanwhile in today’s paper, Boulder, Colorado has just had a gathering of global warming scientists who have confirmed global warming. So what? You have ferns in Alaska. They can’t prove that man had anything to do with it. But, those who wish to plan our lives from the womb to the tomb and lower our standard of living so that we all ride bicycles instead of driving cars will push for more government regulation and intrusiveness. Oh dear Mother Earth what shall we do - boo hoo hoo.
George Lilly
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:53 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Spanish “pre-buttal”

Below is the letter I sent to Senator Ken Salazar: Dear Senator Salazar: I read with some dismay about your Spanish language version of the Democrat annual State of the Union preview speech.
I am a first generation American. My father was born in a German colony in Russia in 1891. My parents spoke German in our home but embraced this beloved country and learned to speak the common language, English. I value my limited knowledge of the German language.
It is my belief that families should celebrate their heritage and this countrys diversity but should embrace with all the fervor of patriots the togetherness that has made the USA the most desired place to live. My family is ethnically diverse in the first, second and third generation (some part black, some part Hispanic, and two adopted Russian children), but we are all Americans.
I have no quarrel with a translator bringing the message of the preview speech to those who have not yet become fluent in the common language of the USA. However, I do believe it sends the wrong message for a US senator to fulfill the role of translator. Surely you understand that had you not been fluent in English you would not have achieved what you have. America must maintain its historical common language lest we dissolve into a biblical tower of Babel. Following my freshman year at Colorado School of Mines (1958), I worked in a mine in Eagle Co. Lunch the first day was an interesting experience in that my coworkers spoke only Spanish. They switched to English when I told them that I would like to talk to them too.
The purpose of language is communication and a common language is necessary.
Clarence M. Lederhos
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:53 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Iraq

This administration swears that leaving Iraq precipitously will result in total chaos in the Mid East - what better reason is there to believe that that probably wont happen? Bush & Co. hasnt been right, or truthful, on anything about Iraq yet - so why should they be believed now? Why should we further impoverish our economy, decimate our military, and needlessly sacrifice more lives just to save the bacon of a bungling, deceitful administration? It was, after all, the Bushies who swore never to nation build - even as a last resort, which this is - since all of the other purported reasons for this occupation were bogus. So lets leave already, for no other valid reason exists to stay.
So let the Shiites take over, which ( the administration had to know ) would happen when Saddam Hussein was overthrown. Maybe the Saudis will come in to support the Sunnis, and then the Iranis and Syrians, to support the Shia. Should they get involved in Iraqs civil war? Better them than us!
The Saudis, in a form of political justice, may find themselves having to deal with their progeny, Al Qaeda. All this might be very interesting for Americans, for a change, to view from ( hopefully ) the outside.
R. Kiefer
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:52 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Israel & Palestine

Those who have chosen to attack former president Carter for his eye-opening and factual account of Israel’s brutal and illegal occupation, annexation, and colonization of Palestinian land - which violates international law, 70 UN resolutions, and the 4th Geneva Convention, show their blatant and complete ignorance of the Israel-Palestine conflict, and of Carter’s many accomplishments - which include brokering the 1978 Camp David peace accords between Israel and Egypt. Once Israel returned the ill-begotten Sinai to Egypt, and removed their unlawful Jewish settlements - peace followed and persists till today. A similar peace would be possible with the Palestinians, if Israel would simply remove their 150+ illegal Jewish settlements along with their 400,000 fanatical Jewish extremists (innocuously called “settlers") from land they have no legal or moral right to occupy.Carter supports Israel 100% - but as a true friend, has the courage to criticize Israel for their abominable, illicit seizure of Palestinian land, their unconscionable colonization of this land, and their enforcement of these gross illegalities with brute military force - the major impetus for the Mideast conflict. As Carter accurately states in his book, the apartheid taking place in Israeli-occupied lands is not based on race, but on a minority of Israeli’s insatiable greed and lust for Arab land.
Greg Horak
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:50 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

George Bush

The inept, dishonest, clueless “leader” of America is unfit to serve as president of the United States. Bush ignored pre-911 intelligence that may have prevented the attacks, in order to focus his tunnel vision on his neo-con handlers plot to attack Iraq. Even after 911, the lion’s share of our forces are needlessly bogged down in Iraq refereeing a 1,000 year old civil war between Sunnis and Shias, while only about one-tenth as many forces are in Afghanistan fighting the Taliban and searching for Osama Bin Laden. This as Bush treasonously refuses to seal our borders - endangering the lives of 300 million Americans, in order to provide cheap, exploitable, illegal labor to his corporate masters. Meanwhile, our unsustainable trade and budget deficits put the solvency of the United States at the mercy of countries such as China - our real future adversary, who have just unveiled a weapon that could shoot down our military satellites Bush must be coerced to cancel his foolhardy plan to escalate the pointless war in Iraq, and redeploy most of our troops out of the country by the end of the year - or face articles of impeachment which must be drawn up against this deluded, malfeasant, detached from reality president - whose rank incompetence and just plain stupidity are threatening America’s security, our prominence in the world, and our future.
Greg Horak
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:49 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Clifford May

Dear Clifford May, (re: Guantanamo not the pit... yada yada yada...) I understand you are extremely knowledgeable about the way things worked in the former Soviet Republic, Northern Ireland and West Africa; welcome to America! Here, we have something called “due process".
Let me make a comment or two about this snippet you wrote as one of the grabbing paragraphs, “The combatants sent to Guantanamo are those believed...". You do carry on, but there is no need for me to. That statement followed your plea to America suggesting that we should not care about these folks; these people are there for a some valid reason. Thanks for letting America take your word for that fact!
I don’t know which day/month/year of U.S. History you missed in middle school, but holy cow, you missed a headfull. I will refrain from reciting the Bill of Rights at this point, instead, consider the fact that nothing unites the left and the right more than denying one of basic rights, including “due process". Your attempt at defending Guantanamo, does nothing except align hippies with the NRA, and that is very hard to do.
Conservatives, Liberals and Libertarians see this the same - something is very, very, very wrong. The revolution is nigh and the revered Clifford May is defending the indefensible.
(Apologies to certain Libertarians who have held this exact view for quite some time. Consider me with you.)
Kenneth Hodson
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:48 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Mike Rosen

Mike Rosen, in his column of January 19th continues to beat the dead horse of why the rich are rich and the poor are poor—that being, because the rich are more worthy and deserving of wealth. He maintains that those basking in great wealth are rich because they somehow “earn their riches” and are somehow so much smarter than the peasants and plebes who only whine about “equality of outcome” - As usual, Mr. Rosen of course fails to mention the corporate welfare dolled out in the form of secret Dick Cheney energy policies (we still don’t know what this dubious document contains), the propping up of oil companies, mass media, and big Pharma through government subsidies, de-regulation, and tax breaks. The welfare continues with no-bid war contracts “awarded” to Crony Companies such as Raytheon and Haliburton (equal playing field anyone? A no-bid contract is welfare at its finest!). We could go on and on, Mr.
Rosen - How about the “redistribution of wealth” in the form of the looting of the U.S. treasury so that those poor unwashed taxpaying Americans can watch as it is “redistributed” to the war machine, and more crony contractors, feeding at the public trough. These thieves and liars can’t even win a war or rebuild infrastructure, and this “redistribution” has created a humanitarian crisis that the rest of us “unwashed” will have to clean up. STEALING the nation’s wealth is not exactly what could be called earned income.
I don’t see much of the outlandish wealth granted to the corporate world “trickling down” to the rest of the population, which is the is the fallacious idea put forth by the Reagonites - I see most of it going out to CEO “rewards and incentives” to people who hardly have great intellects or great character, and to foreign accounts where the U.S. government can’t touch it— Come on Mr. Rosen! When you give examples of redistribution of wealth, let’s have ALL the examples!
Lynn Highland
Morrison

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:47 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Democratic convention

After reading the short, but ridiculous rant from Robert A. Ritthaler, I felt I had to respond. His type of ignorance must be exposed for the farce that it is. He claims that Denver will be safe from Al Qaeda during the two weeks that the Democratic National Convention is happening in Denver. Like ost of the frothing, hate-filled Right wingnuts, Ritthaler neglects to mention that Al Qaeda had no real presence in Iraq until George W. Bush decided to invade under false pretenses and that the United States is LESS safe because of this.
Another fact that Ritthaler conveniently leaves out of his little rant is that there are more terrorists recruits for Al Qaeda now whose objective is to destroy America than any time before the invasion of Iraq. If Ritthaler bothered to read a newspaper besides the News or watch a news channel besides Fox News, he would also see that several Democratic congress people are proposing to redeploy some of the Iraq troops to Afghanistan, where Taliban attacks have dramatically incresed and the original terrorist threat to our country, that fellow named Bin Laden, is still running free. So, in closing, Mr. Ritthaler should be honest and blame the current administration for increasing the terrorist threat to this country, instead of hurling childish little freshman diatribes at the Democrats, who never were responsible for the threat to our country.
Ethan Hatchett
Lafayette

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:47 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Mike Rosen

Would it be possible for Mike Rosen to directly name people and provide evidence for the views he attributes to them? For example, in his latest column on poverty (1/19/07) Rosen suggests that Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats are going to “exploit the uninformed...masses” by directing their “anger and resentment” at the “usual villains": bankers, insurance companies, “big pharma", the military, free-trade, free markets, and finally the “rich". In exactly which Democrats’ hands does the fate of modern capitalism hang? Let’s see the actual quotes. Where are the transcripts of their speeches?
Or take Rosen’s column on health insurance (1/12/07). We are warned of a “ploy” to throw around “sensational figures” about the number of uninsured. The unnamed plotters are “pretending” that a snapshot of the uninsured is the same as a permanent population. So who are these schemers? Well, if we take Rosen’s argument at face value the conspiracy would have to include the entire social science establishment. Anything from polls to economic data are presented by people of all political stripes without explanations that they are snapshots. If someone presents a poll without breaking it down by how long people have held a particular belief are they “pretending” that that snapshot is a permanent belief?
Rosen speaks of populist “conspiracy theories and simplistic fantasies” about how the world works. It is in Rosen’s fantastical world, however, that we are confronted on every side by a vast conspiracy of “inbred liberals", “progressives” (read “socialists"), Democrats and anyone else he doesn’t like. It seems to me that it is Rosen who is guilty of trying to create the hysteria he attributes to his anonymous foes.
Ben Harnke
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:46 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Unions

Your Jan. 20 editorial argues, “A minority of workers should not be able to dictate that everyone pay union dues as a condition of employment.” Why not?
A minority of citizens elect our government representatives, pass laws, and modify our constitution. A minority of citizens dictates that everyone pay dues (taxes) to Caesar as a condition of liberty, let alone employment. A minority dictates who even has a right to be in this country, let alone a right to work. Why does your editorial board oppose The American Way in this instance?
David Hakala
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:45 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Islam

In one of his pronouncements Osama bin Laden said, “For more than 80 years we (Muslims) have been suffering humiliation.” His words sent political experts scurrying to find out what on earth he was talking about. However, those familiar with the Islamic world knew immediately that he was referring to the abolition of the caliphate by the Turkish Republic in 1924.
In the minds of Muslim idealists, the world of Islam was formerly led by a glorious succession of caliphs – religious rulers esteemed as highly as the most powerful potentates of Rome. Various dynasties reigned from Medina, Damascus, Baghdad, Cairo, and last of all from Constantinople, the capital of the Ottoman Turks now known as Istanbul.
The Ottoman dynasty ended catastrophically after World War I, when the last of the caliphs was deposed. The last great Muslim empire was partitioned, with all but its Turkish heartland divided between the victorious Western allies. Islamists have never forgiven the West for this humiliation, and their internal rivalries are only surpassed by their shared hatred of the West and Israel.
Dreams of global rule by Islam fuel the ambitions of al-Qaida, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Taliban and other subversive Muslim groups. Like the fascists of the 1930’s, their leaders are autocrats who allow no dissent, and anti-Semitism is one of their major tenets. They carefully study Hitler’s book Mein Kampf under its Muslim title Jihadi. So fascism is back — but now driven by the radical creed of Mohammed!
Even the shallowest review of the Kor’an and Muslim history reveals that terrorism and violence are endemic to most forms of Islam, but advocates of liberal multi-culturalism are still unwilling to concede this point.
We must pray that their misguided concessions to Islam will be disavowed by governments throughout the Western world, and that our leaders will effectively address the perils we face.
Steve Hagerman
Grand Junction

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:44 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Aurora police

Police Chief Oates never ceases to amaze me. Out of one side of his mouth he supports eliminating the two Officers per thousand Citizens requirement, and out of the other side of his mouth he states we have a gang problem that will require him to add additional manpower to the gang unit. Where does Chief Oates expect to cut two to four more Officers from if he reduces his staffing further by the elimination of the two per thousand requirement. I have read his statement in the Rocky Mountain News and noticed there are more than two gang members for every Officer on the Aurora Police Department. The gangs have more than met the two for one requirement with regards to the Police Department, so when will the Chief and City Council meet the two per thousand requirement?
Mark A. Golden
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:43 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Recycling

Recycling in Denver is so ridiculously easy now: those big purple cans on wheels take plastic #1 & 2, cans, papers: office & news. We fill our recycle can much quicker than the trash can now, which leads me to question: why pick up recycling every-other week & trash weekly when the reverse is needed? Why not mandate that all households recycle, not just those who’ve requested it? Hickenlooper has announced he plans to Green Denver: this would be a start. Further, apartment complexes should not be exempt and businesses should not be charged for first can/week. I fail to see any reason to object!
Kathy Glatz
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:43 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Unions

My husband has been in The Carpenters Union for over 25 years. He has always made a good living and supports his family easily.Was he forced to pay union dues for over 25 years? No.Why? He chose to become a union member. He chose to pay union dues.He chose to be a carpenter.The one choice he doesn’t have is where his hard earned dues goes to support political parties and politicians. This is the part I don’t like about unions.
After reading that the legislature is going to pass a bill forcing people to pay union dues even if the don’t want to be in a union, the first thing that popped in my head was,This Is Un- American.
Is this where all the union dues went for during the political campaigns?House Bill 1072 is the wrong way to make unions stronger.It’s not what union members stand for and it’s borderline communism if anything.
Does the Democratic Legislature and the Democratic Governor really think this is fair to all involved?This bill is a bully bill.It bullies worker’s and companies into not having a choice on where there hard earned money goes.Choice!
It is a disgrace to all the hard working long term union members who believe in freedom to choose what is right for them and their families.It makes unions look bad and that is not the case.
I urge the Legislature and Governor to not pass this bill.It’s bad for worker’s,it’s bad for employer’s,it’s bad for unions,and it is not what freedom stands for.
Tracey L. Fanning
Thornton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:42 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Depression

David M. Perkins letter in the speakout column Jan.22,2007 touched me deeply.He is correct that depression can strike anyone at anytime.He is right that it is misunderstood and people who never have gone through it don’t understand,It is not one of those things you just, “ snap out of. “ Anyone at anytime can suffer depression.Often it is a traumatic event that triggers it.For me it was the death of my mother.I watched for 6 weeks as she died a horrlble death.I too went in and out of treatments and drugs.I don’t think the Dr.s even understand it.They either over medicate or under medicate.
Employers will never accept depression. It is often a long term illness and needs many different Dr’s,many different medication’s,time off for appointment’s and insurance.Employer’s are not happy when insurance is used as often as it is needed by a person with depression.It is a long term illness and the medications are very costly and are changed regularly until the right one is found for that person.
Depression isn’t a once a year check-up. It could be once a week,once a month,but it is a long term process.It’s been 4 years since the death of my mother and I am finally on one medication and doing much better.It was pure hell getting to this point.Employers will see you as an insurance liability,days missed,mentally not able to handle everyday work,work long hours etc.. In other words if you suffer from depression you are a liability for a company.
I am fortunate that I don’t have to work.As for the millions out there that do you will get the complimentary one week of understanding from your employer after your traumatic event that will trigger your depression.After that you are a liability and subject to termination.You have one week to snap out of it or hide it very well.You have my sympathy.
Tracey L. Fanning
Thornton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:41 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Lafayette annexation

I have been a resident of Lafayette for 25 years and have seen a lot of change. Despite that, Lafayette still has a great sense of community and a small town feel. I am very concerned about Issue A, which will be voted on in February. It involves the potential annexation of property on the southeast corner of Baseline Rd. and 119th St., for the purpose of constructing a Lowe’s.
If Lafayette really needs another “big box” store, I question the location. As a new “Super Wal-Mart” goes up across town, there will be yet another abandoned store needing redevelopment. The eastern edge of town is the only entrance to Lafayette that as yet remains undeveloped. In addition, there are precious wetlands just west of the proposed site, which serves a beautiful array of birds and other wildlife that will undoubtedly be adversely affected by a project such as Lowe’s. If you have not been over to see the area, please do, it is beautiful. You can access it from Burlington, just east of the tracks.
Lafayette has both a lumber yard and hardware store that will obviously feel the financial pinch and possibly be put out of business by building a Lowe’s here. That is sad from my perspective, because if we continue in this vein, Lafayette will begin to look just like every other town in this area, which offers an abundance of corporate, oversized, chain shopping and little else.
We already have 5 other cities within reasonable traveling distance that offer Lowe’s, Home Depot or both. Since the city has a history of offering tax incentives to some new businesses coming in, do we know how this particular business would benefit our town? With no proposed road improvements, an already horribly congested area will become much more burdened with traffic.
Finally, I understand the Waneka family wishing to sell their property for fair market value. I believe they have a right to do so. It seems, however, that all options have not been explored. Lowe’s is huge, with big corporate dollars. As a community, it seems that we should be able to come together to support the family’s desire to sell without sacrificing another piece of Lafayette’s soul. The people of this town are indebted to the Waneka family for all their contributions. I know another avenue can be found.
R. Dunne
Lafayette

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:40 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Wayne Allard

When Senator Wayne Allard announced that he wont run for reelection, both the Rocky Mountain News and The Denver Post headlined his assertion that he is honoring his term limit pledge (I believe a promise made is a promise kept). Maybe its true, but did anyone at either paper stop to ask, Is that really why Allards retiring? Statewide and nationwide, we are trending toward the Democrats. Between that and his designation by Time Magazine as one of the worst senators in Washington, maybe Allard simply figured, If I run again, Ill lose. Anyway, if the man feels so firm about keeping his word, why did he take so long to decide its the only honest thing to do?
Greg Dobbs
Evergreen

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:39 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Family upset

In response to Cam Swanson of Commerce City feeling the Rocky Mtn News didn’t owe an apology to Adam Bernal’s family. Go back and read the letter again. I didn’t say what he did was right, as a matter of fact I point blank said what he did was wrong. The reason the Rocky Mtn News owed the apology to the family was because they just had to let the world know about the only thing left of him was the BLOOD in the snow!!!
You don’t think his family was upset enough to know what he had done???
You will be happy to know that his family did not reap one dime from his ill gotten gains, as a matter of fact most of his family are in the construction business and have been for over 40 years in this town!!!
Read it again!!!!!!
Judy Bernal
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:37 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Darrent Williams

PLEASE KEEP THE DARRENT WILLIAMS CASE IN THE NEWS!!
I moved from Denver to St. Louis last year. I was very disturbed by the Williams murder and I have been following via your website. I would hate for this to become “OUT OF SIGHT, OUT OF MIND” for the public, reducing the possible opportunity for more leads.
Mary Beal
Arnold, Mo.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:35 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

TV tower

Those residents and elected officials in Jefferson County are correct that the high definition television tower to be built on Lookout Mountain is associated with health issues. Indeed these individuals are suffering from mental health problems and undoubtedly also believe that high transmission power lines cause higher incidents of cancer, bottled water is safer than tap water, and frogs cause warts.
I’m pleased that our two Colorado senators do not suffer from this mental health affliction and together settled the issue.
Martin J. Allen
Centennial

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:34 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Allard simply didn't want to lose in '08

After hearing Sen. Wayne Allard praised for deciding not to run for re-election in 2008, I feel it necessary to pose the question: Has anyone considered that his decision might have less to do with keeping his promise to voters and a lot more to do with his desire to not lose the ’08 election?
It’s no mystery that Colorado is trending bluer with every passing election. Since 2004, Colorado has elected two new Democratic congressman, a new Democratic senator and a new Democratic governor. It’s quite obvious to political observers that Colorado is no longer the reliable red state it once was.
Judging by the electoral failures of other Bush-enablers who were up for re-election in November (like George Allen and Rick Santorum), voters aren’t likely to stick with the senators who vote with the administration 95 percent of the time.
Ironically, Allard is withdrawing from a race he isn’t likely to win, but he won’t support withdrawing troops from a war we cannot win militarily. Sure, he kept his promise, but I have little doubt that if the political winds were blowing in the other direction, his decision would be different.

Bo Tuerk, Golden

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Rocky's stance on rail system shortsighted

The Rocky Mountain News’ abrupt dismissal of a statewide passenger rail system is extremely shortsighted (“Ranger Xpress a very low priority,” Jan. 5).
The editors believe the Ranger Xpress, proposed by former state representative and RTD Board member Bob Briggs, is too expensive and would attract too few riders to make the venture worthwhile.
It is exactly for this reason that Briggs and his organization, the Rocky Mountain Rail Authority, are doing a study of the proposed travel corridors. A grant from the Colorado Department of Transportation and matching funds from local governments will help answer the questions about cost and travel demand for such a system.
Though the scope of the study might include travel from Casper to Albuquerque and Denver to Grand Junction, it is entirely possible the study might find costs and ridership for only one or two segments may be justified.
For example service between Fort Collins and Denver or Denver to Colorado Springs and Pueblo may have the strongest potential in the near future compared with the other corridors studied.
Intercity passenger rail service provides a comfortable, safe and reliable alternative mode of transportation for those who cannot or may not wish to drive. Given the snowstorm experiences of recent weeks, I would imagine many travelers would gladly trade a trip on Interstate 25 over Monument Hill for a pleasant, relaxing train ride.

Jon Esty
President,
Colorado Rail Passenger
Association
Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Giuliani type needed

Hit-and-run on Denver streets (including entire families run down and killed by drunken drivers), stabbings, drive-by shootings, crime witnesses shot to death before they can testify — it seems Denver has become a Third World country much more dangerous than Iraq.
Is it time for a Rudolph Giuliani type to step up? Giuliani proved the “broken windows” theory works. He was a leader who cared about his city.
A Denver mayor, concerned with the city instead of political goals, could start by cracking down on gang member thugs and the illegal immigration populace that brings its lawless culture with it. Something needs to be done soon, or no one will want to go into the city for any reason.

Fern Rossi, Lakewood

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Change of heart on smoking ban

Awhile back, I submitted a letter regarding the smoking ban. I was commenting on Rocky restaurant critic John Lehn-
dorff’s column, saying that maybe he should stay home and leave us smokers alone instead of going to restaurants and having to breathe our smoke. Well, since then I have had a change of heart.
Why should nonsmokers be subject to our smoke? If they choose not to smoke, they have the right not to ... and the right to not breathe our smoke. Personally, I smoke four to five cigarettes a day, so it is easy for me not to smoke in any public place. I strongly believe that we should have respect for our fellow man ... however unfair it is to us.
As for my husband and me, we just don’t go out to eat anymore. It is the principle of the thing. We feel like people are treating us like lepers or something. We feel sorry for the small mom-and-pop establishments whose business is affected negatively by the ban.

Leilani A. Mueller, Northglenn

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Smokers pleased to bridle their business

So, Sen. Ken Gordon wants to finish what former Sen. Dan Grossman started (“Smoke-free casino bill on tap,” Jan. 13).
Well, that’s OK, Grossman is no longer in office, I guess the voters can decide Gordon’s fate as well!
I am in my 70s, very healthy and I smoke. I like to smoke and have no intention of quitting! My husband smokes as well. We are sympathetic and courteous to those around us who don’t smoke.
We used to spend time and a lot of money on vacations in California, but when they banned smoking most places, we quit going.
We don’t frequent bars and we do not patronize restaurants anymore, either.
Before there was limited gambling in the mountain towns, we went to Las Vegas at least twice a year. They welcome smokers. (Has anyone ever noticed that several casinos in our mountains towns have no-smoking areas? They are all virtually empty!)
I’m sure that the loss of our business won’t make a whole lot of difference, but it sure is satisfying to us!

M.J. Fogarty, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

A plan for Iraq

Congress should allow only enough funds for the new troops and the Iraq war until Sept. 11, giving President Bush and the Iraqi president notice that if the mess isn’t cleaned up by then, we will only have funds left to bring the troops home.
If Bush keeps them there longer, it would be his sole responsibility.
Bush and Iraqi President Nouri al-Maliki will know what they must do. The American public would support this by 85 percent.
Al-Qaida, Hamas and Hezbollah should know this. They want us out. They might even curtail bombings. They would do what they would do no matter if we left in one month or five years. At least, this is a plan.

Leonard Muniz, Broomfield

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

My, these pit bulls certainly are vicious

Coincidentally, the Rocky had two dog stories in today’s paperits Jan. 17 editions, and both involved pit bulls. What’s really strange is they didn’t bite or kill anyone! How did this get by yourRocky censors?
On Page 5A, youthe Rocky showed Zeus, who somehow managed to survive the fire at Castle West Apartments in Colorado Springs. He not only survived the fire, he survived the aftermath in cold weather.
On Page 14A, you showwe learned about Lucy, who was left outside in subzero weather by her Boulder owner (“It’s cold outside, even for animals/Frost- bitten pit bull testament to neglect”). Another dog, Bobby, cared for by the same ignorant owner, had to be euthanized due to his cold-weather injuries.
Just look at those vicious dogs! You can just tell from the pictures that they’re about to jump up and take someone’s hand off! I can’t understand why the Rocky Mountain News didn’t ask that they be immediately destroyed for managing to survive. The Denver, Aurora and Commerce City mayors and city councils would!

Bob Johnson, Thornton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

What chutzpah!

What supreme chutzpah! How the city of Denver even dares to fine people struggling to clear walks while the streets in my area of the city look like a World War I battlefield with deep ice craters and deep ruts is unbelievable and unfair.
It is a typical approach of a coward and a hypocrite. It is, Do what I say, not as I do. And why is this mayor held so blameless when past good mayors were tossed for far less?

Frank Galmish, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

McInnis a nonstarter

Scott McInnis couldn’t get elected dogcatcher in a Republican primary (“Allard seat open in ’08,” Jan. 16).
Too many longtime Republicans remember the antics of he and Ben Nighthorse Campbell during their final year in office. These two gave away safe seats to the Salazar brothers and helped precipitate the decline of the party in Colorado.

Mike Eller, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 22, 2007
Iraq war

We must no longer engage in this illegal war on any level. We must bring our military families and children home and stop putting them in harm’s way.
This is not a winnable “war” because of its ideological basis - tribal holy wars, if you will. Our presence there is merely supporting one of the terrorist factions. How is this bringing democracy to Iraq? In fact, contrary to what our President says, the U.S. presence in Iraq is not making us safer, but inciting more terrorism against us. Our government needs to put an end to our involvement in this senseless bloodshed. Two million Iraqis have fled their increasingly and deadly violent country, and we’re still sending our kids there.
How can one make any sense of that? Democracy is supposed to be a government by and for the people. Currently, most Americans are aware of the situation in Iraq and want it to end. We can help do that by asking our representatives to support Bills H.R. 508 and H.CON.RES.197.
Sharlene White
Colorado Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:21 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Iraq war

In the letter from Hank Curtis (Dems don’t have the guts to stop Iraq fiasco,” 1/18) he fails to grasp two important realities:
1) Congress does not have the authority to override Bush’s decision to increase troops. The Democrats will posture themselves but their efforts to stop the current surge are nothing more than symbolic.
2) Troop withdrawal from Iraq was not a referendum on the ballot last November. The citizens of the US do not make the decisions regarding military strategy in any way, shape or form.
The authority over these issues is described in our constitution and the laws of the United States. For the sake of our soldiers and the sovereignty of our country, these decisions can never be left to a congressional whim or public vote.
Kipp Welch
Phoenix

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:18 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Illegals & health care

Illegals & health care

I have a question for Dr. Gary D. VanderArk (“Rosen aside, health-care crises is real,” Speakout, 1/19) who says that there are 47 million uninsured in the US, 770,000 of these in Colorado.
There are probably 20 million illegal aliens in the US and, according to another recent article in the News, 250,000 families of illegal aliens (which means (750,000 actual people) live in Colorado. My question, Dr. VanderArk is this: how many of the 47 million across the US and 770,000 in Colorado who you say are uninsured, are illegal aliens? I don’t see any breakout of that in your article.
Dr. VanderArk may be able to shrug off (or more likely, dodge) his share of the taxpayer cost of insuring all these illegal aliens, but my family cannot. And nobody—least of all well-to-do do-gooders like Dr. VanderArk—is offering to pay our health insurance.
J.M. Schell
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:16 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Fixing mess that is 41

It is amazing that the well-financed organization that wrote Amendment 41 could not foresee the problems it is likely to cause, and find it perfectly acceptable to leave it up to the legislature (who evidently this legislation was intended to punish) to spend its time and state resources to “amend” the amendment to “unravel” all of the unintended consequences.
To me, it appears to be another reason to be so very careful about putting narrow-scope, special-interest legislation into the state constitution where it does not belong.
I know the people who voted for it felt — because of all the hype — that they would be solving a problem, but didn’t and now many hours and tax dollars will be used to correct the situation.
Linda Schafer
Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 02:11 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Recycling's importance has been clearer of late

In response to the Jan. 11 Rocky article, “Piles of garbage have many down in dumps, my family, too, has been waiting for four weeks now for our garbage service to pick up our trash. Our neighbors (who are wonderful people, incidentally) haven’t had theirs picked up in that time, either. I have been observing the difference in quantities of garbage perched hopefully in front of our respective homes these last weeks.
The number of people in our families is the same. We have one garbage can plus one medium bag and one small bag of trash. Our neighbors have three garbage cans, seven bags and three large boxes of trash.
The difference is that we have recycled all of our glass, plastic, cans, paper (including wrapping paper!), boxes, junk mail, etc. I can see that our neighbors don’t recycle.
Recycling is so easy to do, and these last weeks of interrupted trash service and overflowing dumpsters illustrate how much of a difference recycling can make. Three-quarters or more of the trash people throw away can be recycled and given new life, and it is very easy to do either curbside or putting it in a bin for streamlined recycling that is probably within a few blocks of your home.
Check out www.wmcolorado.com for bin locations, or search for other Denver Recycling options on your computer.
Once you start recycling, you will wonder how you could have thrown away all that good trash.
Annette Sapp
Lakewood

Posted by denver-admin at 02:07 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Mexican immigrants are keeping ship afloat

In her letter of Dec. 19, “Making ICE raids a race issue is offensive,” Lori Woods likened the United States to a sinking ship. What she should remember is that the people who were detained by ICE agents at various Swift meatpacking plants in December are the very same people down on the bowels of the ship running the bilge pumps, trying to keep the ship afloat.
Out of the hundreds who were arrested in Greeley, ICE had warrants for 25 people specifically and not even that many were stealing the identities of hard-working Americans.
Granted, those detained were apparently breaking the law. However, who would not do the same to feed their family if it means sneaking across the border and working in the shadows for lower wages?
Mexican immigrants are not the terrorists. They are not holding guns or making bombs. The majority are just hard-working people trying to feed their families.
Luis Ramirez
Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 02:05 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Senate race

Having cleaned up Satan’s playground, the Good Sheriff Brown is moving on. It is regretable that he felt not more loyalty to the University and continued his able role as fundraiser. Hopefully though, Governor Ritter will find a replacement more concerned with academics that politics. One has to wonder though that, perhaps, February, 2008 gives the former Senator enough time to ride to the rescue of the Republican Senate Primary, which promises to be a nasty dogfight. Should he want it, the candidacy would likely be handed to him on a platter, which would give Mark Udall a heavyweight opponent indeed. As for the Congressman, I would recommend that he begin immediately to let us, the voters, know more of who he is, what he stands for, and what he has done during his tenure. There is no room for complacency in this upcoming race and, in my mind, Mike Miles, in his race against Ken Salazar, presented a clearer voice on the issues of today than I have heard from Congressman Udall.
Robert Porath
Boulder

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:04 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Sex offenders

Colorado lawmakers want paroled sex offenders to register the e-mail addresses. I guess it is to track their whereabouts. I know that it would be hard to do but why not prevent the sex offenders from obtaining a e-mail address in the first place. I am tired of the state lawmakers shutting the barn door after the horse is loose. Do not let sex offenders obtain certain goals and the internet is only one of these thing. Living around schools is another and working around, etc.
Leroy M. Martinez
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:02 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Oil prices

It is really curious that when oil prices rise: congress, the public, and the media blame greedy oil companies but when prices go down the decline is attributed to free market fluctuation.
Robert Lipton
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:57 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

African-American flag?


I was rather taken aback by the photo on the Jan. 16 home page of the Rocky Mountain News Web site. It showed a horseback rider at the stock show carrying an “African-American flag.
Excuse my ignorance and lack of political correctness, but just what the heck is an “African-American flag”?
Funny, I thought we were all Americans, with just one flag.
Mark Lieberman
Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 01:57 PM | Comments (22) | TrackBack

On Point

In 2000, the Rocky Mountain News urged voters to elect neophyte George W. Bush over the vastly experienced Al Gore. Now Vincent Carroll, editor of the editorial pages, laments the lack of experience of Senator Barack Obama.
Carroll reminds us that he wrote a column nearly a year and a half before the 2000 election questioning George W. Bush’s lack of experience. But he stops short of revealing a very relevant piece of information: who did he vote for in 2000? Al Gore with his 24 years of experience as an elected official (eight as Vice President, eight in the U.S. Senate, and eight in the U.S. House of Representatives) or did he vote for George W. Bush and his scant four years of service in state government?
Anyone who voted for Bush in 2000 cannot be taken seriously as they lament the lack of experience of Barack Obama. It’s fine that Carroll wrote that column back in 1999, but when it came time to put his vote where his mouth is, who do you think he voted for?
Lawrence Jones
Conifer

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:55 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Eavesdropping

President Bush’s decision now to get warrants from a “secret court,” for eavesdropping on Americans allegedly linked to terrorists still smacks of a “secret police,” framework that would have made Adolph Hitler proud. I don’t see much improvement in new policy here, so far as accountability goes, from the warrantless eavesdropping the Bush administration has been practicing unabated and in apparent violation of our constitutional rights. “Who will protect us from our protectors?”
Sterling Greenwood
Aspen

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:52 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Ladies’ night crusader out to line his pockets

Steve Horner’s letter of Jan. 12 about banning bars that give discounts to women, “Ladies night crusade all about civil rights,” was laughable. I suspect it’s about using the civil court system to line his pockets with extra income. Honest people get a second job to earn more money.
Horners claim that this is a gain for civil rights and a strike against feminism is akin to tilting at windmills with a slingshot.
Ladies night isn’t even on the feminist agenda. You don’t often see proteges of Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan in the local pub downing half-price drinks and doing body shots. No, ladies night was pretty much invented, and wholly endorsed, by men in order to attract more women (i.e., nonfeminists) into bars.
Horner is like that kid you remember in grade school who spent most of his time ratting his fellow students out to the principal for any number of frivolous misdeeds.
The real outrage here is a gullible and naive civil court system that’s all too willing to entertain misanthropes who revel in putting up needless and numerous roadblocks that further burden the small-business owner.
Ron Corey
Highlands Ranch

Posted by denver-admin at 01:45 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Darrent Williams

Cyndi Casados took to task Bob Fiesser for writing that perhaps our values are out of whack by suggesting the troops being killed in Iraq should be given more consideration than Darrent Williams, who was being paid so much for playing football. She referred to him as someone who was a role model for all kids who have a dream. While it is tragic that he died the way he did, has anyone given any thought to the fact that this role model had fathered two children out of wedlock before he was 24 years old?
David Acheson
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 09:22 AM | Comments (0)

January 20, 2007
Teen likes bridge, too

I am 16 years old and I look forward to the Rocky's bridge column each day. Where is it? How am I ever to beat my grandmother?

My aunt and her friends think I play a fair hand and, until now, the Rocky has been part of the reason. Please put it back!

Ian P. Warner
Fort Collins

Editor's note: Beginning Tuesday, the Today in History and Bridge features will be returning to the pages of the Rocky Mountain News.

Posted by denver-admin at 06:18 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Daily history lesson

It appears that the Rocky Mountain News has elected to stop printing the Today in History feature. This is unfortunate as the feature was both informative and entertaining.

While I understand that a paper is a business, it is also an instrument that should convey information to its readers, not simply be a vehicle for retailers to peddle their wares.

It appears the the Rocky may be forgetting its responsibilities in this regard.

Today in History was a pleasant and interesting feature and the Rocky should consider restoring it to its pages. A lot of readers would probably appreciate it.

I know I would.

Thomas B. Johnson
Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 06:17 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Disgusted by Post

I am disgusted at the The Sunday Denver Post's prominent, front- page, violent, prurient and obscene photographs of Saddam Hussein's recent hanging (Dec. 31).

Here we see sad proof that enlightenment is a long way off for our nation and our civilization. It is bad enough that America has a hand in this Iraq mess, but the Post's photos seem to glory in the barbarism. The newspaper business has made many technological advances, but nearly no moral progress in the past 200 years.

M. Baker
Lakewood

Posted by denver-admin at 06:16 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Amen to that

I'd like to add my concurrence for the letter from Jane Imber (" 'Diesel' fumes," Talk Back to the Media, Jan. 13) who was wondering why on earth anyone would select this exceedingly lame comic strip, Diesel Sweeties, for publication in the Rocky.

I too have been amazed that such a poor quality strip would be chosen, particularly when there must be dozens of other more deserving strips available.

Al Foster
Lakewood

Posted by denver-admin at 06:16 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Puzzling placement

Thousands of Rocky readers enjoy working the crossword puzzle each day. Many times this is done on buses, planes, light rail trains and in car pools. Before it was redesigned, the page carried the crossword puzzle on its righthand side. In that configuration a reader could fold the Spotlight section in half which gave firm pen support for filling in the puzzle, as well as making it more convenient for the reader and those sitting nearby. With the puzzle now in the middle of the page, it makes that impossible. When the Rocky makes changes, its focus should be to make the paper more user friendly!

John Schoenfeld
Lakewood

Posted by denver-admin at 06:15 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Shame on Channel 4

Brian Maass of Channel 4 has tried to create a news story because two Colorado citizens have lawfully applied for concealed weapons permits ("2 Nugs seek permits," Jan. 13). These citizens are Denver athletes who feel the need to legally carry a firearm for protection.

As we all know, celebrities are quite often targets of violence and mayhem. Law-abiding citizens have the right to apply for a firearms permit without harassment from the media. It's nobody's business but theirs.

Shame on Channel 4 and Brian Maass. While I'm at it, shame on Channel 4 for canning Stephanie Riggs and replacing their wonderful 4 p.m. news with Oprah. Ugh! I now watch Channel 7 news.

Jon Opdahl
Fort Collins

Posted by denver-admin at 06:14 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Rocky's snide jibe

Imagine my surprise on Jan. 3 when I read what seemed to be thoughtful suggestions in "Senators,' representatives' to-do list" only to find this under the list of recommendations for U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo: "Find new cities, celebrities or world religions to use as sparring partners."

I had to reread the other suggestions to see if the Rocky had snide elements for other members of the delegation. Then I had to check to see if I was in the Commentary section. Neither was true.

I don't usually support criticism that the Rocky is biased, but the bias came through clearly in this instance. That is not up to what I would hope are our journalistic standards.

Richard H. Bush
Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 06:13 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Coverage a mistake

t was a mistake for the Rocky to print the predictions of Pat Robertson ("Evangelist predicts 2007 'mass killing,' " Jan. 3). To give him coverage serves only to terrify the vulnerable and amuse the cynical.

His rants are no more newsworthy than those of any lunatic. Civic Center Park features several of these sad folks every day. Why give coverage to Robertson's gaseous output? Someone wisely said, "When you talk to God, that is prayer. When God talks to you, that is psychosis." And, may I add, when you presume to tell others what God said to you, that is the pinnacle of arrogance.

Robertson's record of prophesy is poor, his fearmongering tiresome and the Rocky's coverage of his nonsense is preposterous and unproductive.

Carter McClintock
Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 06:12 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 19, 2007
MLK marade

I participated in the recent annual MLK Day Marade (part march part parade) event in Denver – and, while inspiring,it also left a sour taste in my mouth.
I’ve taken part in these marches in the past, but this was my first after having lived out of state for awhile. When I arrived at City Park at the start of the parade, I noticed that a rabbi was being introduced to pray and as he started his prayer, loud noises from some other p.a. system started blaringsuch that I could barely hear the prayer that was being lifted up to God. Confused, I walked over to where the other voice was coming from and I discovered another rally being held simultaneously to the primary one. I asked one of the people attending that event what was going on and she answered that this alternative rally is a new event “more in the spirit of MLK” than the other one – which she derided as “watered-down, corporate sponsored, de-radicalized". A bit indignant, I shot back that MLK was a Christian pastor and he’d not likely be thrilled about having a speech drowning out someone at prayer.
A friend of the young woman overheard us and interjected that this new rally is grass-roots movement “of the people” and I’d likely be welcome to say a prayer if I wanted to on their speaker system. And then he handed me a slip of paper describing theorganizers of that rally.
After a few more words were exchanged, I walked back over to the main rally in time to hear the end of someone else’s prayer and then, with no transitional words or pause at all, someone took the microphone and started sharing about how great Kaiser Permanete is for helping sponsor today’s events. I’m sure it wasn’t their intent, but it actually felt like “These prayers brought to you by…” And then, as the parade started, I couldn’t believe the number of people walking around with State Farm hats and scarves and signs saying “State Farm, we share the dream.” It felt like the event was being cheapened by having corporations exploit it with their promotional freebies.
I understand that these sponsoring corporations give money to the MLK Foundation, but is their sponsorship of the Marade actually needed? Various religious groups and social justice organizations could easily hand out hats and scarves as well has hot coco or coffee - and, in honor of MLK’s concern for economic justice, you can sure it’d be Fair Trade chocolate and coffee! The other thing that rubbed me wrong was that the smaller, newer, “more radical,” alternative rally had theirfolks chanting “The people, united, can never be defeated!” – while they had people walking about with smaller bull horns heckling and goading the larger crowd of people whowere at the other rally. Talk about ironic.
Moreover, some of the language coming from the main speakers of the alternative rally was less than to be desired. This is supposed to be a family event and there were many children present. Feel free to be radical politically, but if you can’t say it without vulgarity, it may not be worth hearing.
The whole thing was quite sad and I’m not sure that the man whose birthday we were supposedly honoring would’ve appreciated much of it. Clearly, there’s room for moderates, liberals, and radicals, etc. under MLK’s big tent, but darn it, why’d it have to feel so tense and yucky? I urge the leadership of both of rallies to meet together in advance of next year’s Marade. A repeat of what took place this year would not be something I’d care to experience again.
That said, long live MLK’s dream of a “beloved community” living together without war, without racism, without economic exploitation and in peace, harmony, and justice for all!
Roger Wolsey
Boulder

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 06:18 PM | Comments (0)

Iraq

I hope President Bush will address the plight of the nearly two million Iraqi refugees who have been forced to flee the violence in their country. Some of these people have been targeted in Iraq because of their association with U.S.
and other western forces. Refugees International has called this the world’s fastest growing refugee crisis in the world. Given our central role in Iraq, I believe we have a responsibility to help these people. We need to lead an international initiative to support Middle Eastern countries hosting Iraqi civilians. We need to recognize and support the constructive role Syria is playing in hosting Iraqi refugees and help it keep its borders open. We need to significantly increase our support to the UN Refugee Agency so that it can meet the needs of Iraqi refugees. We need to agree to resettle vulnerable individuals, particularly refugees who had to flee because they worked for Americans, including U.S. government, military, contractor and nonprofit organizations.
Iraqis are fleeing because they have a genuine and credible fear for their lives and the lives of their loved ones. Whether Sunni, Shi’a, Christian or Palestinian, they have been directly victimized by armed forces. The refugees, faced with no legal work options in their current host countries, are now hoping to resettle in Europe and North America because they know that if they return to Iraq, they will die.
The rapidly increasing and deadly violence in Iraq has made civilian life untenable, and is creating a refugee crisis that is essentially exporting the nation’s instability to neighboring countries. It is essential that the U.S.
government take the necessary steps to meet the needs of Iraqi refugees. We need to exhibit what democracy is really all about.
Sharlene White
Colorado Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 06:17 PM | Comments (0)

Trash service

Bad trash service, First let me say that I understand that service was bad during the big storm’s of December 2006, that was a given. I am talking about before and well after the big dump of 06. My complaint is with Allied Waste Services; the Wednesday before Christmas they missed my pick up. I called customer service (303-287-8043) and actually talked to a live person. I was told they would be out on Thursday. No trash pick up, so I called again, talked to a live person, apologies all around and that they would be out on Friday. No trash pick up. Called Friday, talked to a live person and got the same response that they would get my now two cans of trash on Saturday. No pick up and customer service is closed on Saturdays. Long story short and three weeks later they came and picked up every can I own plus several bags piled on the side. Since their takeover of BFI the only thing they have been consistent with is sending my bill and raising my rates. Granted BFI missed me on occasion but were very diligent in coming back out the next day. Yesterday 1/17/07 I had the pleasure of seeing their truck making the neighborhood rounds only to watch them slow, look at my one can and drive off. Thinking they might have two trucks out to catch up, I went about my business, only to find when leaving for work at 4pm all my neighbors cans empty. Now when I called customer service, I got a recording asking me to leave a message and my call will be returned by the end of the next business day. If this is what they call customer service, I foresee a bleak future for AW. I will be contacting the competition and I respectfully suggest others that have been treated badly by Allied Waste to do the same!
Brad Warren
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 06:16 PM | Comments (1)

Gangs

The 1/19/07 article by Chris Barge and Dan Chacon on gang members seems related to the hot air emanating from Peter Boyles latest radio campaign to get ratings by beating whipping boys, in this case the old demon of gangs.
If some millionaire Bronco did not get killed at some club where folk were too busy flashing money and “bling” and indulging in drugs, drinking, and conspicuous consumption, while carrying guns, your headline about gangs would not have wasted the ink it has now wasted.
One tip-off to the shallow content of the article was that it trotted out the old “summer of violence” rhetoric, which was a term created by the media anyway.
I see the local “authorities” have again trotted numbers of “confirmed” gang members, and the article even repeated the lame criteria used to “confirm” the status of the members. If you have the time for even simple research, you’d see these “criteria”
originated with California authorities over 3 decades ago. When your reporters recite them it seems authoritative, but the criteria have more holes in them than Swiss cheese.
Your naive and inexperienced reporters recount that the last gang figures were released in 2003, and totalled 220 gangs with 14,000 members, but here is where your reporters again did not do any homework.
When the DPD gang unit floated those figures back in 2003, I and several others found that the figures the coppers cited stated that over 90% of the alleged gang members were Black or Brown.
Then we got the number for alleged Asian gang members.
Then we researched the US Census for Black, Brown and Asian youth in the prime gang ages [I think we used 14 to 26].
By comparing the cops silly assertions to the hard data of the Census for Denver, we found that the only way the figures could be true was if 2 of 3 of all Black males, 50+ percent of all Latino males, and 1 in 4 Asian males in the cited age brackets were gang members. That IS NOT TRUE and is probably statisically impossible. And to state the data in those terms demonstrates the RACISM implicit in the claim...
When we went to Judy Cisneros, Michael Hancock, Doug Linkhart, and Councilman Garcia with our findings and concern, NONE of them contested our findings, but neither would they look into the issue. Garcia essentially said he did NOT want to be perceived as being “soft” on gangs.
The only ones who paid less attention to us were the cops [FOR A WHILE]and the print media. Then, weeks later the cops lopped off several thousand names from the so-called gang list after our little research campaign. Neither daily, of course, found this worthy of any ink.
Reporters need to open their eyes [and their brains] before trotting out this hysteria-ridden “data.”
The person who crunched the figures for us in 2003 is a former gang member with tatoos. He also obtained a Ph. D. at UC Boulder. If you want a real “gang authority", contact him. He is Robert Duran who is now teaching at New Mexico State University at Las Cruces. [RobertDuran@mail.weber.edu]
Ernesto B. Vigil
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 06:15 PM | Comments (0)

Benefits system

Where are Pelosi and Reid when you need’em? State Sen. Hagedorn, in the Jan. 18 Rocky Mountain News article, “Hearing eyes benefits woes. The system is ineffective, and it’s not working. It’s as simple as that", should use the CBMS (Colorado Benefits Management System), as just a mere single example of local federal funds fraud, waste, abuse, and RICO violations. Pelosi and Reid are convening congressional investigations into wrongful appropriations of federal funds. Sen. Hagedorn is mis-guided in creating a state “whistleblower’s protection law” for this federal funded computer project. The USDOL, CFR-29/41, and FAR, already has these federal protections for whistleblowers. Strange, Hagedorn isn’t complaining that Mike Leavitt, Secy. U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, hasn’t knocked down his door, armed with his Bush administration sanctioned fiscal oversight and taxpayer stewardship hammer.
Can’t find former State of Colorado Human Services executive director Marva Hammons? Are we giving her a state retirement check? If so, this check should be stopped, until she answers a host of federal funds questions. Hagedorn should join forces in a bi-partisan effort, with state auditing sleuth’s and rep’s Gardner and Cadman, state attorney general, and Denver Deputy USAG, so they can drill-down and find out how $223 million in taxpayers’ funds were actually used. Hammons and Owens are solely responsible and accountable for the CBMS project’s compliance to federal procurement, hiring, and contracting laws.
A great place to start their audit would be Hammon’s perennial USDOL-OFCCP VETS-100 reports, which discloses the data and facts, surrounding the CBMS project’s contracting and hiring of combat disabled military veterans. A special treat would be Hammon’s hired a CFO during her tenure and I would be tickled pink to know if that successful candidate was a vet or just another illegal political appointment. The real culprits in the CBMS fiasco, is the entire bipartisan state legislative body, who succumbed to Owens “mushroom” policies.
James J. Tenant
Lt. Commander, U.S. Navy, Ret.
Cenennial

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 06:13 PM | Comments (0)

Emergency management

Coloradoans aren’t safe with either the GOP or Democrats. There was no hint of our legislatures individual responsibility, accountability, due-diligence, oversight, or stewardship, in the Jan. 19 Rocky Mountain News article, “DIA shutdown becomes political football". Shirking immediately comes to my mind. We should all cut and run for our lives. DIA’s blizzard-gate affects the whole state with regards to commerce and our nation’s national security overall. I hope NORAD has a plan for DIA in the event of a national emergency. Denver Mayor JLoop and former Gov. Owens, should be held to account for their lack of a state/city disaster preparedness plan and wrongful appropriation of federal funds, earmarked for DIA operations and the state’s FEMA readiness. JLoop should also be held to account for his other gates: Garcia-Gomez and felony hiring of criminal illegal Mexicans, asbestos-vermiculite, and ballot.
The governor is our state’s commander-in-chief. Gov. Ritter is solely responsible for all facets of emergency management throughout Colorado, which includes DIA, oil refineries, interstate highway system, etc. All praises to him/her “on-high", Rocky Flats is closed. Owens continually showed his incompetence during multiple rock and mudslides on I-70 and Hwy. 6. He was ignorant of the fact, President Ike created our nation’s interstate highway system for the following reasons: (1) national security - to move troops and their equipment, (2) commerce, and (3) going to grandma’s house and the ski slopes. Owens allowed prolonged weeks of gridlock on these vital transportation arteries, simply because he was incompetent and he had successfully put the bipartisan legislative body in a mushroom state of mind. Astonishingly, the generals and admirals at Ft. Carson, NORAD, National Guard, and Space Command, never complained about this issue. In their defense though, they know Owens and Bush, both have a history of firing senior military officers that don’t agree with them and their reckless decisions.
The state gov’t should “trot-out” its emergency management plans, so they can be scrutinized by the citizenry and to train the public in general. Coloradoans are starting to reap what it has sown with regards to incompetent emergency managers. The ball started rolling when Butch Montoya (video-journalist) was appointed Denver Public Safety Manager. He was replaced with LaCabe (prosecutor/cop). Owens (draft-dodger) advertised the state emergency director’s position for public competition, lo and be hold, his GOP crony, inept George Epp (cop-draft dodger), was illegally politically appointed (violation of U.S.Senate appropriations/state constitution) to the position. Did I mention I applied for this job with my federal 10 point FEMA hiring preference?
James J. Tenant
Lt. Commander, U.S. Navy, Retired
Centennial

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 06:11 PM | Comments (0)

Diversity spending

Silly me. I thought former state auditor Joanne Hill was long gone ("Thank God and Greyhound, you’re gone"). The Jan. 18 Rocky Mountain News article, “Two seek audit of diversity spending” shows her ghost is still kicking. State Rep’s. Gardner and Cadman are also pre-occupied where pennies ($21.8 million in CU’s diversity program) are being spent, just like it was with Hill and her showboating audit of CU’s football, “wine, women, and song” funds. These two point-men, like Hill, give the Keystone Kops a bad name. Diversity is code for aiding disenfranchised citizens, who are seeking educational assistance, so they can better themselves. Most of these applicant-citizens are of an ebony-hue, and their fore-fathers have historically paid taxes to support CU, however, they nor their children were permitted to use the institution.
The GOP is famous for finding irrelevant wedge-issues, to deflect their guilt or pilfers in other areas. If the GOP posse of Cadman and Gardner really want to do all taxpayers a favor, then they should audit the disbursements made in the $14 billion in federal funds spent in the T-REX, Fas Tracks, and Stapleton/Fitzsimons redevelopment projects. Until I read their audit findings, these projects will always be remembered by me as GOP cash-cows, graft, and pork. Gardner and Cadman should tread lightly here, because they just find the undisclosed location of more “roomies” for Cunningham and Nye.
Colorado has more than 400K military veterans. Those of an ebony-hue, would appreciate knowing from an audit conducted by Gardner/Cadman, how and why, Owens (draft-evader) nullified their federal disability, contracting, and employment benefits, in the aforementioned federal projects. Maybe Gardner and Cadman can lend a hand. Across all racial lines, our vets have seen their benefits package vaporized by Owens and the GOP. Gardner and Cadman should repeal Owens’ illegal standing order which prohibits State of Colorado Veterans Affairs (VA) and Department of Labor (Veterans Employment & Training ) employees, from aiding vets in getting state jobs and contracts. Invader-in-chief, President Bush, has the same “standing order” as Owens, with his U.S. Dept. VA veterans employment counselor’s.
On both sides of the political aisle, our congressional reps and entire state legislative body, have failed our veterans in their lack of fiscal oversight, stewardship, “due -diligence", accountability, responsibility, and overall shirked their sworn duties. Cadman and Gardner should purge all of Owens’ lingering illegal appointees to state career civil service jobs and give those earmarks to their rightful owners, vets who served when America faithfully and honorably, when she called them to serve.
As a personal request. My family, bank account, and I, would appreciate it if this dynamic duo would audit why I applied for more than 250 jobs in the past 17 years with numerous state agencies, and never got an offer of employment. Thanks to the likes of Cadman, Gardner, and their draft-dodger led GOP-posse, I proudly join U.S. Rep. John Murtha (USMC Vietnam War hero), “I wouldn’t serve in today’s armed forces".
James J. Tenant
Lt. Commander, U.S. Navy, Retired
Centennial

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 06:09 PM | Comments (0)

Race relations

Dave Krieger...keeping Darrent alive. Thanks Rocky for letting Dave be Dave.
After a playoff game Saturday night, an out of town nephew and I went to visit a Denver relative (through marriage) from Uganda. There may be a difference in attitude between an “African” who becomes “American", in modern times, as contrasted with African-Americans who hold slave-trade grudges. The difference might help resolve issues where racial culture and stereotyping is a factor.
The talk after the playoff game went racial in a heartbeat. Perhaps there is some truth to the assertion that, “White people don’t understand black athletes or their culture". Folks who know Uganda know how violent things can get if you show up at the wrong location. One thing our conversation identified was the willingness of young athletes to venture into risky territory. Especially young black men.
My relative from Uganda knows a lot of Denver athletes. Because he is a Black professional he can hang around with Black athletes at a social level where conversations about gangs, drugs, and partying, sometimes stereotypes whites. There is no denying some gang deaths have merited more ink than others.
That was not said well. I can’t say it any better. Someone should.
I would bet that my relative from Uganda would sit down with an honest reporter and say it better. Putting one’s family name In a newspaper column is asking for trouble if gangs and ethnic culture are to be openly discussed. Not everyone is as big and brave as Claudie Minor. But I see brave men stepping up to the plate.
I noticed in the “sports column” of Dave Krieger that Minor, and ‘good old Denver District Attorney Norm Early (who ran for mayor of Denver in 1991 and I got to know him as a friend since I ran then also) are having discussions in memory of Darrent Williams. It has been 17 days since the Denver street-murder of #27.
I wonder how Denver media will respond when gang-prevention specialist Rev. Leon Kelly adds a new name to Denver’s gang death list, and bumps Williams off the top of the scroll. I haven’t yet seen the full list of Kelly’s “gang deaths", but I do know the list is long, and it can not include everyone who has died because of drugs and gangs in the Denver metropolitan area.
Kreiger mentioned violence in Baghdad in context to violence in Denver. It seems to me the organizational charts of Iraqi militias is probably quite similar to the hierarchy of gangs in America. It’s time to draw a line in our own sand.
Steve Schweitzberger
Littleton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 06:06 PM | Comments (0)

Driving

DRIVING IS AS PRIVILEGE NOT A RIGHT! No matter how much carnage talking and driving creates, people still think it is within their capability to do so safely (the same mentality as that of a drunk driver). It is difficult to regulate a potentially dangerous behavior pattern that has becomes an entitlement to the masses. Even the legislature is hesitant in their efforts to control it as they too have become entitled.
One of the biggest safety issues in the flying profession is listening to communications while operating a high performance machine. Training in this area is ongoing. I do not know where these drivers get their training but I would not feel safe while driving in heavy traffic and trying to communicate on the phone.
Driving is a privilege, not a right so let us regulate the conditions. Here are a few starting steps.
1. Drive in the right lane (same requirement as slow driving) and hang up when changing lanes. This allows all distracted drivers to play bumper car among themselves.
2. Park & Talk 3. We are now compiling statistics on talking and accidents. Instead of bigger fines make the penalty for second offenses the same as DUI and highly publicize the rules.
4. There is a simple test to determine one’s ability to multi-task. If you have an accident you must take the test if you wish to continue to talk and drive.
If you took the test and found you were really suffering from delusions of adequacy and you could not safely drive and talk, would you hang up and save the children? Probably not!
Jim Reid
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 06:04 PM | Comments (0)

Illegal immigrants

This letter is in reference to an article that appeared in the Dec 20, 2006 Denver Catholic Register: “Archbishop Chaput’s statement on the arrests of unauthorized workers (page 3). As a cradle catholic and with all due respect, I have a couple of issues with Archbishop Chaput’s position on illegal immigration. He states up-front, “the church supports the law…and \[it’s\] right to secure our borders...”. My first issue comes with his next point, “…these raids have disrupted hundreds of families in the immigrant community and frightened many thousands more”. He doesn’t have a problem with respecting the law, he has a problem when it’s enforced. Is law enforcement to blame or the parents of the families? There’s not an illegal out there that doesn’t know they’re illegal (except the children).To take a shot at law enforcement or anybody except the illegal is displaced. The parents, knowingly illegal, are placing their children in harms way -that is a form of child abuse. The parents know there is a possibility of getting caught and they know the consequences, but they stay anyway. Where is the accountability of the adults that came here and put their family in that position? Instead, it’s law enforcement’s fault because they enforce the law? “It’s not my fault I broke the law – it’s the police’s fault because they caught me”. That’s ridiculous! Even more absurd is, we should continue to let people break the law because it’s Christmas.
In the article, I quote, “As we enter the last few days before Christmas, we urgently pray that God will grant our law enforcement authorities prudence, justice and restraint in carrying out their duties…” I hope that our law enforcement - and medical personnel continue to carry out their duty – whatever it may be. Who are we to ask our law enforcement to NOT do their job. In fact what does the bible say about tax collectors and guards alike? I think the hang up is that the Catholic church doesn’t see illegal immigration as a crime, because if they did, then it should be enforced –right? Just because you don’t agree with it, doesn’t mean it’s not illegal. Imagine a society were people followed only the rules they agreed with. I’m sure the Archbishop has heard the term “cafeteria catholic” – one who picks and chooses what they want to believe or adhere to. But isn’t that what the Archbishop is doing with our laws? He is picking not to adhere to our current immigration laws – (we know they’re illegal, but let them be). Aiding and abetting a criminal is against the law – and by encouraging it, the Archbishop is somewhat culpable for people that get caught doing it, however, I doubt the church is going to pay their legal cost. No one is saying that we shouldn’t help the poor. If an illegal immigrant comes to your church, by all means feed them, cloth them, and give them shelter – and then call the police; just as you would anyone else who is breaking the law. Would you aid a burglar or a thief (outside the sanctity of confession)? Make no mistake about it, the thief and the illegal are both victimizing society- just in different ways.
Certainly a man with the education and experience of the Archbishop, can see the economic burden illegal immigration is costing this country. To acknowledge that fact and say “yes but” – is not acknowledging it, but minimizing its impact. The Roman Catholic Church has an estimated asset value in the hundreds of billions of dollars worldwide. Perhaps they wouldn’t mind footing the bill for the unpaid medical, education, social services, legal costs, loss of taxes not being paid (by illegals), and other expenses that illegal immigration costs us (the taxpayers), and not the non-profit entities like religious organizations (not tax paying).
As a church leader the Archbishop is doing exactly the opposite of what I as a catholic expect of him. I expect him to empower and lead, not take on public policy and encourage people to break the law. He’s setting the wrong example of how to help people help themselves. There is an immigration process in place – whether he likes it or not, it is in place and should be followed until it gets changed. I would like to see our politicians fix the immigration policies (that’s their job) and our religious leaders worry more about saving souls, keeping us focused on God, teaching us external/internal morality, and taking on the larger atrocities being committed to innocent people around the world – like Africa. Would the Archbishop feel the same and go to the extent that he has if the “undocumented” workers were 10-12 million Muslim workers? Because if he would, there are hundreds of thousands of dead Africans that could’ve used his help and hundreds of thousands more in dire need still.
There are more pressing issues in our country besides immigration for the Archbishop to hang his hat on. There’s pornography, abortion, morality, sermons that actually make sense, drug/alcohol abuse, homosexuality, church attendance, catholic education of Catholics, the ten commandments, and many more. Stick to serious issues –like educating the billion plus Catholics about the billion plus Muslims; can you say Holy War - someday?!
Doug V. Mahoney
Littleton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 06:03 PM | Comments (2)

Electoral College

Once again, it appears Colorado’s lawmakers are progressing down a disastrous path in agreeing to join a compact that would award Colorado’s electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote.
The founding fathers of the United States created the Electoral College specifically to protect the rights of states with smaller populations, such as Colorado, from being subject to the whims of larger states without being able to express their opinions.
At present, even if a candidate for President wins the electoral votes of most larger states, he or she would need the electoral votes of other states to achieve the total required to be elected President.
Under the compact advised by Colorado’s lawmakers, Colorado will no longer have any voice. Winning the popular vote will require a candidate to only carry the votes of large municipal areas and large states. Candidates will no longer need to visit Colorado or court its voters, as they would be assured of Colorado’s electoral votes regardless of whether a SINGLE Colorado resident voted for them.
Why would Colorado citizens want to give away their voice in the political process in order to support the choice of the rest of the country? Would Coloradans be willing to allow any other decisions regarding the state to be made exclusively by voters of other states? Why would they be willing to throw away the votes of what may well be the majority of Colorado voters to support a choice made by voters elsewhere?
I urge everyone to IMMEDIATELY contact Governor Ritter and urge him to veto this dangerous bill and allow Colorado voters to keep their voice in selecting the President of the United States.
William Kucharski
Louisville

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 05:46 PM | Comments (0)

Bonnie Erbe

While Bonnie Erbe swims in a world far to the left of mine, and I nearly always find her assessment of life strange and hopeless, still I am amazed at how acerbic and unkind her article of yesterday was. In Vile idea of transplanting wombs is going too far, she paints anyone and everyone considering such a procedure as, well, vile. Her depiction brought Cruella deVil to mind.
Doctors involved in the pursuit of enabling a pregnancy are angling to cash in on the fertility/virility mania, and are preying upon seemingly senseless couples struggling with fertility issues, who will gleefully drop hundreds of thousands of dollars to explore various options. There couldnt possibly be anything noble in those people‹no way. After all, whats all the bother with a simple biological urge to reproduce anyway?
They should be ashamed.
And this from a staunch supporter of abortion on demand: It still seems beyond ridiculous that a doctor would spend precious research resources to cure a condition that is not life-threatening. Hmm. To Ms. Erbe, the death of a humanlike primate to assuage the ego of an infertile woman is intolerable, while the death of a baby in the womb is not. Wow.
Short of dropping the notion of transplanting wombs to facilitate pregnancy, Ms. Erbe suggests that, rather than conduct any testing on animals whatsoever (testing which has born fruit a thousand times over), Let the testing be performed on those women to whom it is of tantamount import to bear a child. I think Cruella deVil, the frightening woman who, while planning for a fur coat, feigned delight over the unborn puppies of a pregnant Dalmatian, has leapt from the pages of a book or from a movie screen and taken on flesh.
Ralph Harris
Longmont

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 05:44 PM | Comments (0)

Iraq

"Grim” stats only undermine our efforts in Iraq On January 1, 2007, we reached another “grim milestone” in Iraq, according to the associated press - 3,000 U.S. soldiers killed. Grimmer still, is the major media’s daily reporting of the death toll as if it were reading a score card. I’m certainly not taking this number lightly. I have the greatest sympathy and admiration for those who have given their lives in Iraq and their families, but I would hardly call 3,000 casualties in 4 years a grim milestone. Consider these numbers: We suffered 405,399 American deaths in the Second World War, 54,246 in the Korean War, and 56,244 soldiers were lost in Vietnam. In fact, there are more than a few battles in American history in which we took significant casualties, such as Gettysburg (7,058), D-Day (approximately 2,500), Iwo Jima (nearly 7,000), and more recently, the 3,000+ civilians lost on 9/11/01. If Americans are spoon-fed a steady diet of the “grim” details seven days a week, then eventually public opinion will turn against any war, not to mention encourage our enemies to step up their attacks.
There’s no denying the fact that some critical mistakes were made in dealing with Iraq since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, but to give up now and withdraw troops would only serve as a feather in the cap for Al-Qaeda and the other insurgents operating in that country. As for the 3,000, perhaps we should consider what the casualties might be in the future if we allow these radical Islamists to take control of Iraq and further threaten our security with Iran only miles away to support them. Historically, that would be a poor tribute to soldiers that have fought and died there so far.
Richard Colwell
Parker

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 05:43 PM | Comments (0)

Jimmy Carter

After I called (in your letters pages) Jimmy Carter the greatest living American, I was rebutted by a snooty letter in those same pages and by an anonymous postcard ("Jack - you’re an idiot") to my home. The shock of the latter was somewhat ameliorated by the fun photo of the leggy Puma model on the obverse.
Take your pick whether Carter is or ain’t the greatest living American, but I’ll say one thing without rebuttal: Carter was the closest thing to a Christian, that is, what Jesus might call a Christian, to be president in the twentieth century.
Jack Woehr
Golden

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 05:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Abortion

I applaud the Catholic Archbishop, Charles Chaput, for his column in the Denver Catholic Register. Chaput is within his rights to challenge the Governor for his plans to restore family-planning clinics. If Gov. Ritter is “pro-life,” as he purports to be, then it behooves him, as a Catholic, to adhere to the teachings of the Church. State funding should in no wise be given to Planned Parenthood and other such clinics, which are known to promote abortion. We hope that the Governor will listen and act accordingly.
Brian Stuckey
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:59 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Abortion

Ah, the beauty of doublethink, indeed. It very fitting that Mr. Tom Longua cited George Orwell’s work on the subject and process of doublethink in his letter to the editor on January 15th. I speak particularly of the totalitarian governments logic, and the latter of the three mottos that follow thereafter: “ignorance is strength.” It is fitting, because while Mr. Longua feels obligated to defend his position on abortion, he fails to apply logic to his argument. He stated that DeGette’s plan for the advancement of stem cell research will require the “killing of thousands-maybe millions-of human embryos.” While it is true that her plan requires human embryos, Mr. Longua cannot seem to grasp the concept that abortion is a legal right granted to women. If people are getting abortions anyway, why can’t we utilize this, and save the lives of people suffering from alzhemers, dimensia, or Parkinsons? It seems a fruitless exploit to continue rants on how harmful abortion is. Since no one has proven when exactly life begins, why cant we focus on helping those whose lives have already? This recurring theme of being only pro-life until birth has plagued the right-wing for years, and the fact that it, too, is subject to the principle of double-think is not sinking in too well. Perhaps I am a little too optimistic, but I will continue to hope that the far-right will stop complaining about other people, and start to complain about the issues we can change.
Travis Schriner
Strasburg

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:58 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Paul Krugman

Much as I like Paul Krugman, I have to say that his knee-jerk criticism in his Monday Jan. 15 column of California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s proposed universal health care program barely hours after it was announced leads me to conclude that he’s clueless when it comes to health care. Krugman, a Princeton economist, clearly favors a single-payer system “similar” to Medicare. More about that in a minute.
Krugman contends the Governator’s proposal was too “complex.” Maybe the east coast smog is getting the New York Times columnist. The California proposal, modeled after one enacted in Massachusetts, is fairly simple: everyone has to buy health insurance. If they can’t afford it, the state will subsidize the premium. Why not let the program be implemented, to see if it works? The fact is, the public is now too distrustful of government to support a federally run single-payer system. And liberal democrats are introducing a universal health care proposal in the U.S. Senate this week that similarly relies on private health care policies.
As for complexity, I buy a health policy and deal with a single company. Nice and simple. My mother, who is on Medicare, is another story altogether. She has four policies – Medicare Part A which covers hospitalization, Medicare Part B which covers physician services, a private Medigap insurance policy that covers everything Medicare does not pay (which is a lot!), and, now, Medicare Part D, her prescription drug plan. Now that’s complex!
Richard J. Schneider
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:56 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

The EPA

This comes as a shock to me - because it is already taking place! The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has begun closing its nationwide network of scientific libraries, effectively preventing EPA scientists and the public from accessing vast amounts of data and information on issues from toxicology to pollution.
Several libraries have already been dismantled, with their contents either destroyed or shipped to repositories where they are uncatalogued and inaccessible. Some members of Congress have asked the EPA to cease and desist because scientists and the public need unconstrained access to this critical information to protect our health and environment.
This administration is doing everything it can to render the EPA helpless in protecting the environment. While the Union of Concerned Scientists - which put me onto this scam - suggests complaining to Stephen Johnson, EPA administrator, I believe that if someone really wants to help save this agency¹s integrity, contacting their Congressional representatives , and publicizing the situation, would be much more effective.
R. Kiefer
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:54 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Barack Obama

At first quick glance I thought that media darling Barack Obama was shown walking on water in that big color picture in Wednesday’s Rocky (page 25A). But no, it was just blue carpet or concrete, not sure which.
However, your newsroom editors really outdid themselves with their big play of an incredibly fluffy and marginally newsworthy story by an Associated Press writer trying her darndest to make a shaky connection of the new Illinois senator with Abraham Lincoln (both from Illinois — wow!). I was also struck by your copy editor’s fawning headline above the story: “Senator following in footsteps of fellow Illinoisan Lincoln.”
If Obama were to don a stovepipe hat and begin growing a beard I suppose your journalists would try to convince us readers that reincarnation is surely at work here.
All Obama did was file paperwork for a presidential exploratory committee the day before, but what an opportunity this made for newsroom liberals to once again puff up their favorite candidate. And another opportunity for newspaper readers who want some fairness and objectivity on the news pages to once again sigh and consider canceling their subscriptions.
Alan Hobden
Florissant

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:29 PM | Comments (0)

January 18, 2007
Amnesty International selective in its outrage

After re-reading Ashley Ruiz's letter of Jan. 11, "After 5 years, abuses of detainees must end," I wonder what fantasy world she has been living in.

Perhaps she and the rest of Clueless International were either sleeping or "out of town" when we were besieged with pictures online and in the media, showing people being beheaded. Of course I don't recall reading anything about Amnesty International's outrage over those "little happenings." But those folks were Americans, not "poor" foreigners who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

As for due process and so-called "nightmare of justice," let's clear the air: These detainees are not U.S. citizens. They do not wear uniforms (hence no Geneva Convention rules). They do not believe anyone but Islamists should have a place on this planet.

Ruiz wants them to have due process? She should move to Iran, China or North Korea and see how well her outrages are accepted. Of course, I doubt we would ever hear from her again, as the track record of "justice" in those lands seems to be lagging as well.

Jim Capano
Windsor

Posted by Darlene Trujillo at 09:35 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Horses pay price for irresponsible owners

In response to Constance Preble's letter stating that horses are not pets and that the American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act is unnecessary, I would like to add my two cents' worth ("Horses not in same category as cats, dogs," Jan. 2).

Millions of Americans do feel their horses are pets. I am one of them. Preble states that horses cost between $200-$250 a month to feed and care for and yet the cost for carcass removal is too high; therefore we should just slaughter horses so we don't have to see old horses on the side of the road. What total nonsense.

If you can afford to feed a horse and care for it, you can afford to have it buried in a pet cemetery or taken to a rendering plant. And if you can't, you have no business owning a horse. I get so tired of people not being responsible pet (or "livestock," according to Preble) owners. We do not need to continue slaughtering part of our heritage to help out irresponsible owners. I urge everyone to ask their senators to support the Horse Slaughter Prevention Act.

Barbara Hanson
Denver

Posted by Darlene Trujillo at 09:34 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Allied Waste's strategy: ignore its customers

I read with great interest "Piles of garbage have many down in dumps," the Jan. 11 Rocky Mountain News article concerning garbage collection (or rather, lack thereof) during the recent blizzards. I was especially interested in the following part about Allied Waste:

"Kelly Cook, a spokeswoman for Allied Waste Services, which has more than 100,000 customers in the Denver area, said the company is trying to get everyone back on schedule by Monday. 'We have not heard (from) a lot of people who have been missed for three weeks,' she said. 'It's not widespread.' "

Her first sentence should really have read, "We have not heard (from) a lot of people who have been missed for three weeks - or more - because we have not answered our phones since Dec. 22. When our customers have called in to see when they can expect a pickup, they have either received no answer, a constant busy signal or they were placed on hold for 30 minutes or longer only to be cut off before they could speak to a person."

In my neighborhood, the last pickup was Dec. 15, which makes today, Jan. 12, four weeks since we have had a pickup.

At the very least Allied should have provided a recording informing callers just what was going on.

Instead they chose to ignore their good, paying customers.

As soon as I can get ahold of one, a different trash service will get my business from now on.

Linda Longworth
Arvada

Posted by Darlene Trujillo at 09:33 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

A circular argument for continuing the war

Letter writer George I. Geikas ("Don't criminalize political missteps," Jan. 9) uses some highly questionable logic to justify continuation of the Iraq war. He says, "(Rocky columnist Paul Campos) is in no position to predict what the outcome (of the war) will be . . . Such conclusions (that the war was a mistake) are a long way down the road."

In his circular reasoning, Geikas uses the continuation of the war to justify the continuation of the war.

Suppose his friend had a gambling addiction, and he suggested to his friend that he stop gambling. His friend refuses, saying, "Since I am going to continue gambling, you don't know what the outcome will be, so your position has no merit." Would Geikas be persuaded by this argument? There may be reasons to continue the war, but an unknown outcome - because the war is being continued - isn't one of them.

He ends with this comment: "I am incensed that there are so many people . . . who pretend they were innocent bystanders when this decision was proposed. If one disagreed, the time to protest is long gone." Did George Bush merely propose going to war? Isn't he, in his own words, "the decider"? I was one of the many who did disagree; Bush ignored us all.

Bill Jevons
Boulder

Posted by Darlene Trujillo at 09:32 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Too late wise

The administration's new moves against Iranian terrorist groups, if they are being carried out as described to us, make very good sense, are useful in quelling terrorism and could reduce violence in the world over time. If only the administration had been so prudent and right- thinking four years ago prior to invading Iraq. Just think how far ahead we could be in our anti-terror efforts today!

John Ruckman
Lakewood

Posted by Darlene Trujillo at 09:32 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Dems don't have the guts to stop Iraq fiasco

There are two things that are becoming so obvious that, to paraphrase H.L. Mencken, even editorial writers may take notice. The first is that President Bush will continue his increasingly dangerous and rotten empire building in Iraq no matter what the costs to our soldiers or the Iraqi people, even as the country goes up in flames of the civil war he created.

The second is that the Democrats won't have the courage to stop this fiasco. They know the old accusations of "not supporting our troops" are becoming meaningless, yet they still freeze. It's as if they're Superman having kryptonite thrown in his face.

They're forgetting to consider the real point of whether or not our foreign policy is justified.

The Democrats continue to twist and turn, making distinctions between funding the "surge" and funding the war. Many are still reluctant to even call for a timetable for withdrawal.

Trying to micromanage the war and cutting selected funds won't stop this president. The administration will just rummage through the hefty Defense Department budget. No, if Pelosi and her friends have any real guts, they will pull the plug on this surge and the whole war by cutting funds in toto. In doing so, they would show what supporting our troops really means - bringing them home safely.

American voters spoke out in November that they are no longer willing to spend blood and treasure to establish and defend any more puppet regimes in faraway lands.

The question is, are the Democrats really listening?

Hank Curtis
Fort Collins

Posted by Darlene Trujillo at 09:31 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Animal cruelty

How sad that the very “ranchers” and “cattlemen” who value the precious lives of their “products” (i.e., sentient beings called “cattle) when they are sold to the slaughterhouses cannot even care enough to protect these “products” from hypothermia when a severe snowstorm renders these poor animals virtually helpless. Is it too much to ask for ranchers to build sporadically-placed warming huts for their cattle to at least get out of the cold, rain, and snow, and possibly have a small amount of protection from natural predators?? I can’t imagine that these huts would take too much away from the ranchers’ profits, and, DUH, indeed, their profits would be increased, NOT decreased with deceased animals!! What a concept!
It is a true moral irony that there are HUMANE laws to protect ANY OTHER innocent animals left out in the cold and snow; however, there are none for “ranchers” and “cattlemen,” who obviously do not care enough to protect their “investments” with even a bit of shelter. To me, it is legalized cruelty and even more reason to shun the cattle “industry” and promote vegetarianism.
Kathy Hixson
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:47 AM | Comments (1)

Paul Campos

With the New Year’s execution of Saddam, the routing of Al Qaida in Somalia and now the hanging of Hussein’s top henchmen, 2007 is starting off to a pretty good start. Despite these positive developments, we can always count on Rocky Mountain News columnist, Paul Campos to find something to whine about (Commentary 1/16/07). Today, Campos takes on Bill Kristol, Editor of the Conservative national magazine, the Weekly Standard, all-star panelist on the leading cable news round table on television and now, a weekly columnist with Time Magazine. As to the specifics, of Campos’s charges against Kristol, I’ll leave those to Kristol himself to refute, but as to the timing of Campos’s rant I suggest the following: When Bill Kristol speaks to Conservatives on FOX News or in his own publication, the Standard, Campos could care less, but now that he’s earned access to a National liberal readership, Campos is afraid that he (and other liberals) will have to actually debate a well-reasoned Conservative viewpoint.
Rather than simply tearing down everything Republican or Conservative, lightweights like Campos, will now have to actually advance alternatives ideas and solutions. Forced to put up or shut up - my money is on Kristol.
Except for offering pointers on dieting, Paul Campos’s missives have yet to get anything right. He’s a college law professor that never writes about the law and alongside an intellectual giant, such as William Kristol, America will see that Campos isn’t qualified to bag Kristol’s groceries.
Dennis Goldman
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:24 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

January 15, 2007
Tax credit helping to save priceless heritage

"Powerful tool protects state heritage" would have been a better title and theme for the News editorial of Dec. 26 ("A lucrative scheme to not develop land").

Colorado's innovative conservation easement tax credit is an effective tool that protects our state's priceless heritage. Here in Mesa County, the tax credit has helped conserve orchards around Palisade, wildlife habitat along the Colorado River, and scenic, productive ranchland.

The tax credit has made Colorado a national leader in private land conservation. The growth in the use of the tax credit means that more property owners are choosing to conserve the natural lands that make Colorado what it is.

As with any innovative public program, the credit can use some fine-tuning. The land conservation community stands ready and eager to work with the state to ensure that future generations of Coloradans get the maximum benefit from our conservation activities today.

Rob Bleiberg
Executive director, Mesa Land Trust
Grand Junction

Posted by denver-admin at 06:48 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]