[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

January 2007 | Main | March 2007

February 28, 2007
Amendment 41

Bob Zwiezen of Centennial writes:

Wow! Is it true that words actually mean things?
During the past political season, there were voices crying in the wilderness warning us to consider carefully what we were asking for in Amendment 41. We now have what we asked for. Oh, woe! Does Amendment 41 really mean what it says?
Everyone is dithering about because the chickens are coming home to roost. Legions of lawyers are assembling to corkscrew the amendment’s words into definitions that Webster’s Dictionary never knew existed. Judge-shopping has begun to find one (or more) that will contort the amendment’s wording into newly discovered meanings and intentions.
If, as Jared Polis says “the unintended consequences are what neither I nor the proponents of Amendment 41 ... wanted or expected,” why did they choose the wording that they did?
Were they unable to read and comprehend their own words?
I offer this thought to Polis, the proponents of Amendment 41 and the voters who were duped into supporting it: You paid your money and made your choice — now, live with it!

Posted by denver-admin at 01:38 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Classified ads


Lou Lamberson (no hometown provided) writes:

I’m very upset at the increased cost in classified advertising in just the past few months. as a landlord with a few properties I used to spend $60.00 to rent a property prior to combining the papers. Then within the last 6 months I was paying just over $ 300.00 to rent a property/ now that cost is up to $450.00. and I get nothing more for my money. You force us to pay for 4 lines when we don’t need that many. I’ve have yet to receive a call from the internet which you now include and we used to decline.
my problem is my income from rentals has not gone up these past few years and I have to list it for longer periods of time in some cases up to 3 months of advertising per property.
Plse reconsider your consumer needs.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:37 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Airline passengers


Gary Justus of Evergreen writes:

An airline passenger’s bill of rights most certainly should be imposed on airlines! ("Fixing a flight-wait fiasco” on Feb. 23). Congress already heavily regulates this industry and has made it safer in the process. Now it’s time that passengers aren’t held prisoner to inept airline operations managers who won’t push back an empty jet to open up a gate for a full one.
I once sat all night on a jet that had to land in Colorado Springs due to fog in Denver. After three very low passes over Stapleton’s runway 27 left, diverting to the low fuel alternate was fine. But we were then held hostage by the start up airline because they didn’t have credit to pay for use of a gate. Pride Air stopped flying a week later. Had they let us into the terminal we could have arranged our own ground transportation home or waited for the bus that finally arrived at 6 a.m.
A three hour time limit on the tarmac is quite reasonable. If the airline can’t observe that they can send a bus to the stranded plane and compensate every passenger with a refund of the full ticket price and a free pass, taken from the managers’ annual bonuses. That rule will keep those managers on their toes! Why should “all airlines have to have the same policies” the News asks? They don’t. Three hours is just an outside limit that airlines could then improve upon.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:37 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Two governments


Richard Hiatt of Guffey writes:

The fact of having a “runaway presidency” is now obvious. As is the fact that we have “two” governments – one provisional (a two-party system, the illusion of democracy) and one permanent (oligarchy).
Despite this “Democratic” Congress, despite massive protests, there’s a hidden government still going full-steam with its own private agenda - corporate empire, military dominion, flouting the Constitution, fleecing America, a boom in next year’s Pentagon arms trades ($560 billion), stock gains of 30-40% for Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and General Dynamics, record sales of “discounted” weapons to small unstable countries, the suppression of information, etc. If one simply looks past the (corporate-owned) networks he sees the frightening truth.
Bush has also just signed the “Insurrection Act” allowing him to order the National Guard or military into any state in case of government revolt (“opposed” by all 50 governors) proving just how much he fears the first amendment.
The NSA is also conducting massive data-mining programs - fitting everyone into files called “biometric identifiers” and “identity cards” (fingerprints, retina scans) to watch us. Citizens now have “risk scores” that label us forever. It also has massive new databases to internet spy.
Phone companies, airlines, universities, and employers are now selling (or handing over) information to the NSA on everyone.
Informed critics say we have “two years left” to save this country. It’s time for the impeachment movement to rally. It’s time to get mad and sign on. It’s time to fire, indict, convict, and save America. That’s being patriotic!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:36 PM | Comments (33) | TrackBack

The Rocky


Fred Hammer of Parker writes:

In today’s Rocky (Feb 20) there is a “chapter 25” of the sad tale about the bus/train accident from 1961 which affected many Coloradans. As tragic as the event was, I fail to understand the reason for the incessant coverage in the Rocky. Maybe one or two chapters-but 25?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:35 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Littleton Wal-Mart

Carla Hagood of Littleton writes:

I urge the Littleton community to take action to prevent the Wal-Mart being built by the South Platte park. In wiser years the Littleton City Council sought and guided development to enhance the community, as evidenced by the successful Aspen Grove development. Now they have sold an important support for the quality of the Littleton community for additional tax revenue. One can always use more revenue, but that does not mean that it is needed or that additional revenue cannot be obtained in other ways.
The mantra of the Littleton community has not been development at any cost and should not be. The development for the 24/7 Wal-Mart is wedged between two residential communities and adjacent to the South Platte park.
The park is a jewel of Littleton known for its variety of birds and other wildlife. A Wal-Mart spokeman referred to the wildlife as “nuisance critters.” This attitude does not bode well for this development. Some residents will have their backyards closer to the Wal-Mart than many of the parking spaces. Is this the type of representation we expected from the Littleton government?
We deserve so much better than this.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:34 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Dixie Chicks

Kathy Grant of Golden writes:

I was offended by the Spotlight headline on Monday,f Feb. 12, which read, “Dixie Chicks get last laugh,” referring to their Grammy wins on Sunday the night before.
I would like to pose this question to the Chicks and their fans: Do they think that the Chicks’ newfound Hollywood friends would fight and die to protect their freedom to spout their seditious vitriol around the world?
Right. With “friends” like that, they would be laughing all the way to the firing squad!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:33 PM | Comments (28) | TrackBack

Anna Nicole Smith


David Gouge of Lyons writes:

After watching the ongoing fiasco in the Broward County, Florida court room, three things seem now crystal clear;
1) This hearing would not be the legal circus currently unfolding if the cadaver involved was, in fact, this judge’s wife, mother or daughter — lawyering has clearly gone downhill since Johnny Cochran.
2) Watching this judge with the bright studio lighting bouncing off of his bald head conduct this hearing explains why the U.S. Supreme Court had to step in and stop the Florida recount in 2000.
3) If they don’t hurry up and bury the decomposing body of poor Anna Nicole, there will be little left for the funeral service except for some bones and a couple of sacks of silicone.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:33 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Electoral College


Dennis Goldman of Aurora writes:

Bill Blomberg writes in SPEAKOUT (2/23/07), that Support for the Electoral College system would vanish, if the Federal Income Tax rate for each state was adjusted to equal a state’s relative electoral strength. Under such a plan, residents of states with big populations would pay lesser Income Tax rates while people in the smaller states would (proportionately) pay a much greater share of the national tax load.
Blomberg forgets that we live under a ‘Representative Democracy’ not an actual democracy. Congress is made up of 535 elected representatives not 300,000,000 voting individuals. In fact, those Congressional seats (and consequently the number of Electoral votes) are now and have always been, awarded based on relative population. The key word there being ‘relative’ as would be related to ‘representative’.
Under Blomberg’s ‘pay to play’ tax system, people would be financially motivated to move to the tax-subsidized states of: New York, Florida, Illinois and California, thereby further exacerbating the population disparity between the big and small states, which would in turn, further increase the tax incentives for folks to abandon the small states.
On the other hand, if states with the greatest populations were proportionately assessed for tax expenditures such as: national defense, low income assistance programs, education and administration, much of Blomberg’s tax disparity would be equalized. Perhaps those living in the big population states should be charged proportionately higher fees for: energy, food and telecommunications & programming services, since they produce so little yet consume so much.
Maybe the founders, who created the Electoral College, understood the value of ‘representative government’ as opposed to ‘a government of individuals’ and perhaps we should have the wisdom to avoid the temptation to tinker with it.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:32 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

DeBoer neighborhood

Cynthia Geraud of Lakewood, S.R. DeBoer’s eldest great-granddaughter, writes:

Dear Honorable Mayor Hickenlooper and Members of City Council, In regards to the hostile attempt to designate my family’s property by the neighbors in the area: We, S.R. De Boer’s Family are NOT in agreement with this hostile attempt to take our land.
We, S.R. De Boer’s Family, feel that for the last year, we have been basically ignored by members of the community and the city.
We, S.R. De Boer’s Family were never asked about this designation by ANYONE.
We, S.R. De Boer’s Family have been treated with disrespect and disdain.
We, S.R. De Boer’s Family, know that this property DOES NOT MEET THE CRITERIA for designation, as determined by the LPC and the PLANNING BOARD.
We, S.R. De Boer’s Family, would like you to visit our property and see for yourselves what all the fuss is about.
Please do this, and then make your decision based on the facts.
We hope you will see this for what it is, and reject the entire district.
Thank you, and please register this e-mail as an AGAINST vote for this HOSTILE DESIGNATION.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:30 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Wells Fargo


John Crowley of Denver writes:

I went to my local branch of Wells Fargo bank to make a deposit last week, and saw a sign in the lobby stating that the bank would be open on Presidents’ Day. I remarked to the teller that this seemed rather unusual, and she replied that the bank would also be open on Veterans Day. I asked if the Christmas, Thanksgiving and July 4 holidays were also over, and was assured the bank would observe these holidays, and also Martin Luther King Day. I certainly don’t mean to disrespect Dr. King, but it would seem to me that Veterans’ Day, if not Presidents’ Day, would be higher on the priority scale. I believe our veterans and our former presidents deserve better. I will definitely move my accounts to another bank as soon as possible.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:30 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

9/11

Richard Cope of Denver writes:

I have to wonder when the media will take a serious look at the 9/11 event. Most real scientists now agree that the demolition style collapse of the world trade center could only have been caused by applied thermite and directional explosive charges, detonated in a highly controlled pattern, not by the highly visual airplane impact. Anyone who has doubts about this should look at the collapses again carefully and observe the characteristics related to this. There is an informative video relative to this: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871.
Given the FACT that this is true (this is real science, not ‘conspiracy nut theory’ as has been said by the very people who perpetrated this event), this carries a broad range of implications regarding the Bush-Cheney administration and the policies that they have enacted.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:29 PM | Comments (48) | TrackBack

School vouchers


David Cook of Loveland writes:

Many times in the past you have printed stories or results of polls from other papers or news outlets. Here is one on the question of using tax dollars to by students to attend the schools of their choice, including private schools. You know very well that this is a hot button of our communities here in Colorado. If you are truly interested in parent and community response to this subject, you can go to this web site and see the results of the poll and quote some of the citizen comments: http://www.azcapitoltimes.com/poll/index.cfm?fuseaction=results&pollID=94

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:18 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Free market?

John Chamberlain of Longmont writes:

Nothing does more to hinder the acceptance of free markets as a faux defender defending a faux free market. Mike Rosen and the U.S. economy, respectively, are excellent examples. His column “Is the boss overpaid?” (Feb. 2) says we shouldn’t worry about CEO compensation because it’s just the free market at work.
Rosen is correct to say, “[T]he remedy certainly isn’t more government meddling,” but does he really think we live in a free-market economy? In a thousand ways, government intervention at the behest of dominant business interests crushes competition and protects incumbent firms and managers.
He says, “The market remedy for business stupidity is failure and hostile takeovers.” Is he not aware of the complex of federal and state laws, such as the Williams Act, that diminish the threat of corporate takeovers? And what about the firms that are “too big” to fail, such as Chrysler or any of the major defense contractors?
Many more people will come to understand the justice and fairness of the free market if only we admit that we currently don’t have one.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:17 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Smog

Kathy Beach of Parker writes:

Smog pollution continues to plague the Denver metro area and now clean air scientists with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are saying that health standards for smog, also known as ozone, need to be strengthened. All signs are pointing to the fact that we need do be doing more to safeguard our air, our health, and our children.
For those of us dealing with respiratory problems, Denver’s smog problem is all-too-familiar. Every day, we look for the daily ozone alert to tell if it’s safe to be active, or even to go outside. For many, smog is literally a matter of life and death.
For our children with asthma, it may be a matter of going to a soccer game or going to the emergency room. My son and both of my grandsons have asthma. In all cases, smog is something no Denver citizen should be forced to endure.
If scientifically recommended smog standards were adopted, federal regulations would classify the Denver area as severely polluted. Instead, Denver’s air is classified as clean. The standards have not changed, but that doesn’t mean we should ignore our pollution problem, and the effects of smog on our health. The science is in and the time to act for clean air in Denver is now.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:16 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

DeBoer neighborhood


Robert C. Bayers of Centennial writes:

I am a native of Denver and of Colorado. I attended Park Hill, Smiley, and East, and graduated from the University of Colorado. I remember when Larimer Street had old saloons on it with 60 foot long mirrors behind the bar counters. I remember the Tabor Theatre and Opera House. I remember the old downtown, which development destroyed, foolishly destroyed, taking away—forever!—the character of old Denver. Only Larimer Square remains. It was all foolish. Now, when visiting cities that have preserved their old characters, I envy them their foresight. Travelling in Europe and in other cities that have kept their history and their charm is small compensation for the destruction of the history and charm of the city I live in. Please preserve the DeBoer district! Don’t allow the same old, same old development to take place. Don’t let the generic-looking development destroy the trees, the old houses, the distinctive Tudor-style house on Iliff, the integrated character of the place with its hundreds of trees and bushes... People can live here. Single families enjoy living here with yards and trees and the small-town feel of the place. Instead, the developers come in with their ideas to aggolmerate, agglutinate, conglomerate, and concentrate families into a little stack with the “quintessence of condo.” If there must be development, at least force the developers to preserve the natural beauty of the place. It takes a hundred years to grow those cottonwoods, but really there is no way to keep the total atmosphere of the place if developers come in and tear apart sections of the neighborhood. Thank you for listening.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:15 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Lafayette vote

Shelly Barnard of Lafayette writes:

After following arguments on both sides of Issue A, I’m increasingly wary of how a multinational, multimillion-dollar corporation is attempting to bamboozle Lafayette residents. I’ve now received numerous glossy mailings asking us to support this issue for the good of our community. They have a return address in North Carolina while also stating that they’re from “Friends & Neighbors for Lafayette.”
I’m not surprised that North Carolina-based Lowe’s funds these efforts ($25,000 to date), but what an insult to our intelligence to include a prepaid postcard that we send back to Greensboro if we want to get involved! Pro-Lowe’s yard signs misleadingly use the image of a tree, perhaps coaxing us to link the paving over of rural land with the appreciation of nature.
There are already six Lowe’s stores within a 14-mile radius of Lafayette, and all of them are next to highways or within major commercial centers. Placing this behemoth in a greenbelt between two residential areas as well as in a buffer zone for wetlands — feels irresponsible and unnecessary. Lafayette, I urge you to act with wisdom and foresight. Vote no on A.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:14 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Constitution Act of 2007


Leroy Quet of Denver writes:

Subject: Restoring The Constitution Act Of 2007
I have submitted this letter to Colorado’s Senator Salazar. (Senator Allard is a lost cause.)
Dear Senator Salazar, I was very displeased with your recent vote in favor of such very unAmerican legislation, the “Military Commissions Act". But there is now an opportunity for you to still support the cause you wrote to me to say you were supporting by your vote — the “jump-starting” of trials for at least some US-held “War On Terror” detainees — while opposing the obscenely unconstitutional aspects of the Military Commissions Act — the removal of the once-charished habeas corpus rights of the accused, the almost omnipotent and unilateral powers of President Bush to declare anyone (including US citizens) to be “enemy combatants", and the also unilateral and omnipotent powers of the president himself to decide exactly what is and what is not torture.
PLEASE support the much-needed (and truthfully named) legislation put forth by Senator Dodd, the “Restoring The Constitution Act Of 2007".
And at the very least, please help publicize this very important legislation. Hopefully then the opponents of Dodd’s bill will be embarrassed when Americans realize just how unAmerican and, yes, UNpatriotic they truly are!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:05 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Bush administration


John Kelly of Lafayette writes:

Today the Bush administration simultaneously argues for a troop surge, it heralds a draw-down of British troops as “Good News". On the same day, the Pentagon has shown that helicopters in Iraq are described as “having a hard landing” in addition to the “crashes”
of late, rather than using the more conventional term “shot down.”
So what will the venerable fourth estate do about a Republican administration that lies through its teeth daily?
Look for embarassing articles about Democrats and print them without verification, of course.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:04 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

The Rocky


George Hills of Lakewood writes:

Despite your efforts to cut costs by downsizing the RM News [and soon to be downsizing the Post], I would hope there will be a move to restore some parts of the old paper: I dislike the size of the weather page as it has evolved in the new RM News. Please go back to the larger, more inclusive weather page that you used to print.
I liked having the Movie Review in the Friday “Spotlight.” Please start up the Movie Review Section in the Friday Spotlite.
How much longer will the “Crossing” history lesson go on? Enough already. Ten “Chapters” was plenty.
To “trade some space” so to speak, and eliminate something so as to be in line with the effort to be more “Cost Effective,” you could cut out all the columnists - they are all pretty much irrelevant in their writing on the topics with which they have chosen to bore us all. Along the same line, you could cut the Colorado Rockies coverage by two thirds, given that they are currently are, at best, a AA Ballclub for which the locals have been conned into paying Major League Ticket Prices.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:04 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

The universe


Wells F. Harvey of Denver writes:

A technical point was correctly stated in Planets defy what ought to be there by Seth Borenstein (NEWS 29, February 22, 2007), but was incorrectly noted in the caption that explained the NASA released artist’s conception of exoplanet HD209458b. The caption should have read “900 trillion miles from Earth” not “900 trillion light years from Earth”. Through measurements made by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) the age of our universe is estimated to be (13.7 ± 0.2) billion years. In other words, It takes about 13.7 billion years for light to traverse the distance of our currently perceived Universe. An object at a distance of 900 trillion light-years would correspondingly take 900 trillion years for its light to reach Earth. As this time far exceeds the estimated age of the Universe, any light emitted from such an object would not yet have reached our planet. The conversion is one light-year equals 5.88 trillion (5,880,000,000,000) miles. Applying this conversion to the estimated age of our universe gives a crude estimate of its size (13.7 billion years times 5.88 trillion miles per year): 80,600,000,000,000,000,000,000 miles.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:02 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

The Rocky


Howard Doerr of Greenwood Village writes:

When might we get back to seeing the Rocky Mountain News folded in the center of each page instead of into the printed area of the page and also when will we again be able to read an entire page without sections of it being blotted out by a heavy coating of ink? In Thursday’s paper the George Will’s editorial could only be half read due to mostly ink at the bottom three inches of the page.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:02 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Rocky plays into cynical Dems’ hands

On its Web site and in its pages recently, the Rocky Mountain News was slanted and biased in referring to the U.S. Senate’s refusal to break a filibuster on the Iraq war resolution as a “refusal to debate the war.” Nothing could be further from the truth.
In fact, it is Majority Leader Harry Reid and his troops who are refusing to debate. They will not allow the alternative resolution by New Hampshire Republican Sen. Judd Gregg to be voted on, which calls for a cutoff in funding for the war.
This resolution eliminates the hypocrisy. Instead of a meaningless and nonbinding resolution opposing the troop buildup, it would bring the troops home and surrender the fight.
The Democrats don’t want to have to go on record as being in favor of cutting off funding. They just want to harvest the political capital from a compliant press, without having to take an actual, meaningful stand.

Dan Green, Wheat Ridge

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

The idiot wing

In his Feb. 5 commentary, “Blame America first and last,” Charles Krauthammer makes the frequent complaint so often heard on Rush Limbaugh’s radio talk show: The left always blames America for anything and everything that goes wrong in Iraq.
Not so. We all live in America, whether we are politically right or left. You can lay the blame for the civil war, if you will, on Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who has been dead for more than eight months. But al-Qaida never would have gotten into Iraq if Bush hadn’t gone to war.
Lay the blame not on America, but the idiot wing of the Republican Party which nominated our two-headed President, George Walker Cheney.

Joy Privette, Elizabeth

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (26) | TrackBack

English is our tongue

I may be a Republican, but I totally agree with Democratic Sen. Chris Romer calling for students to be proficient in the English language before they graduate from high school (“English-proficiency bill ripped by Dems,” Feb. 1).
The Democrats say it would cost too much and the money would have to be shifted from scarce resources. I disagree.
What is wrong here? Are we not in America? English is our language.

Robert J. Burger, Fort Collins

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

February 27, 2007
Miniature golf course


John Wren of Denver writes:

Re: Denver plans $1.7 million miniature golf course.
What an outrageous way to spend city funds! What is the justification for this? Government should do for us what we cannot do for ourselves, public safety, health, education, transportation needs. What’s next, a circus?
The Mayor needs to be replaced in the May elections, and we need fresh faces to serve on the City Council.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:37 AM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Illegal immigration


Don Wrege of Boulder writes:

Opinion columnist and illegal immigration proponent Roger E. Hernandez depends upon ignorance of American history to get his point across. His recent piece, “Four-pronged immigration approach might be a winner” (2/23/07) references the 1986 amnesty bill. Hernandez quips, “Ronald Reagan got it right.”
For Mr. Hernandez’s information, Reagan was quoted as saying that he regretted signing the bill, and that it was the worst mistake of his political career. Illegal immigration actually increased as a result, but that’s exactly what Hernandez promotes, so I can see how he thinks The Great Communicator “got it right” by getting it wrong. Another amnesty (or “comprehensive solution,” as they refer to it) would have the same disastrous effects - only multiplied exponentially.
I, on the other hand, have a one-pronged approach to solving the illegal immigration problem: enforce the laws currently on the books.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:37 AM | Comments (38) | TrackBack

The Rocky

Ron Vander Kooi of Arvada writes:

Regardless of the words of a contrarian whose letter (RMN, Feb. 17)
simplistically told readers to get new glasses, the smaller print will
continue to be a problem as will the smudged pictures, etc. If the
Rocky’s goal is to lose its faithful readers with a smaller paper, also
with less content, I predict it will win and will, eventually, go out of
business.

The other clear problem is the “dumbing down” of content, for example,
with sometimes ignorant, irresponsible AND unsigned (except for
nicknames) blogs being printed. To print them seems an ill informed
attempt to gain opinionated readers.

I have long been and remain a defender of newspapers because they are
easily accountable -since they must commit their stories to print. This
makes them inherently more responsible than bloggers and radio talk jocks
as well as radio and TV newscasters. But, as a sociologist, I see most
of the media, including tabloid newspapers, trying to please an
increasingly politically divided population. They reach for a lowest
common denominator. This is a sad reflection both on the media and on
American society.


This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:36 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Handicap parking


Joseph G. Martinez of Brighton writes:

So a police sergeant was asking a woman about parking in a handicap spot. Now the Officer, a Guard and King Soopers is being sued by the woman, and for what, I’m sure if the woman was truely handicapped she would have had a label hanging in the window or a handicap license,otherwise the Officer would not have asked about it. Perhaps she was not handicapped and should have been fined. I see this all the time where people, who ar not handicapped, park in handicap spots. These poeple need to fined since they have no compassion for those who truely need the spots.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:35 AM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Snow removal


Leroy M. Martinez of Denver writes:

The EPA has stated that dumping the snow into the rivers is unsafe. All the trash, feces and other byproducts will contaminate the rivers if we dump the snow into them. Last time I check, the river is made of mud, feces and trash. I know that trash does not belong in rivers. But all rivers have all of the other stuff.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:34 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Molly Bloom


Leroy M. Martinez of Denver writes:

Molly Bloom is a courageous you woman. To OK a plea bargain and not hold a grudge is remarkable. I for one could not forgive a person for a long time that has caused part of my hip and leg to be gone.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:34 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Paul Campos


Keith Maranville of Aurora writes:

In response to Paul Compos’ editorial “The rights Ward Churchill". He states that Iraq had nonexistent weapons of mass destruction.It is sickening to see a man with an editorial column so ignorant about world events. I say we ask the Kurds and Iranians who were both gassed by WMD’s by Saddam. That is a proven fact Mr. Campos. And I would pose this question to Mr. Campos.. Saddam Hussein put live people in plastic shredders (again proven fact),do you really think he gassed the Kurds and thought to himself “wow, I didn’t mean to kill that many, I think we will throw away the rest of the gas.”
It is this very head in the sand mentality that will someday will have Hitler the 2nd sitting in some third world country with the capability to destroy us all. So please check your history before spewing the Democratic line of no WMD’s Mr. Campos.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:32 AM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Campos, Reynolds & Churchill


Robert Lipton of Lakewood writes:

Professor Campos makes a false analogy when he compares professor Reynolds to Ward Churchill for while they both said hateful things the latter was a suspect Indian and a very suspect scholar, perhaps a talented poseur. While the former is at least a scholar of some merit whose background is not questioned .
Certainly both are entitled to say what they wish however hateful. Is Campos questioning their right to speak out. It was not Churchills speech that was sanctioned but his scholastic pretentions , when one draws enemies he must expect to have his vita and work examined.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:30 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Dog attack


Bob Johnson of Denver/Thornton writes:

The article about the 9 year old Erie boy being attacked by the family’s Labrador retriever was a sad story indeed. I have to wonder, however, how much coverage this would have gotten by the media if the dog had been a pit bull or a rottweiler rather than a Lab? My guess is, it would have been a much longer article, much closer to the front of the paper, and covered on all the TV and radio stations! In all honesty, I’m a bit surprised this made the paper at all!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:30 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Iraq war


Tommy Holeman of Boulder writes:

Prince Harry is to be commended for volunteering for service in Iraq. There is no better way to show support for the troops, if you truly believe in the mission, than to put your own or your loved ones lives on the line.
If the Bush twins and Mary Cheney follow his example, we’ll see our troops home sooner than later.
If they follow their respective Daddys’ examples, they’ll chicken out and invest in Haliburton.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:25 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Musgrave & DeGette


Ed Dean of Windsor writes:

Coloradoans follow party line, but vote is politically revealing-(Rocky Mountain News-page 24) (2/17/07)
Some Democrats gotta’ be sittin’ on their brains. They complain that Marilyn Musgrave is a “rubber stamp.” What in heavens name do they think DeGette is and has been since time immemorial?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:24 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Campaign ’08


Jim Bernath of Englewood writes:

I can’t believe that our public servants are out on the campaign trail, and I’m already feeling the burnout that usually occurs about 16 months from now. If anyone of them wants to mount a serious candidacy, he or she will come out right now and say “There are so many crises facing our nation right now that if I can substantially solve any of them as a member of Congress/statehouse/private citizen, I choose to devote my energies to that, so that I can face you a year from now with the positive results of my efforts: a more stable, peaceful, free world. Only then will I consider myself a true candidate.” Or something to that effect. Come on, Mr and Ms Soundbite, there is serious work to be done! Fiddling & fundraising while Rome burns is, as they say, counterproductive...

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:24 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Iraq war


Wayne Wathen of Highlands Ranch writes:

Musgrave’s message that the resolution against sending even more brave troops to die is a little backwards in my opinion. Morale in many cases is already bad for our troops fighting this civil war. Now Bush with the backing of Musgrave, Lamborn, and Tancredo are saying that you are going to stay longer in Iraq and that you are likely to be extended making more hardships for you and your family. That is if you are not one of the future casualities with loss of live or if “lucky” only losing “only” a limb or two. These in Congress have done their best to keep themselves and families out of harms way. The latest loss of lives from Bush’s war ranged in ages from 19 to 46. Surely, there are some families members in that age group that Musgrave, Lamborn, and Tancredo could convince to sign up to go to Iraq. But, I’m sure it is much easier to send others to die. Some, such as Tancredo, even claimed to have mental illness or some mental problem so he would not have to serve in Viet Nam. I wonder if he is cured. They all should be ashamed of themselves and those who voted for them should be ashamed. They certainly do not support the troops.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:40 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Livestock losses


Susan Ueblacker of Lakewood writes:

I recently overheard a conversation where some people were discussing weather forecasts from the Farmers Almanac. They noted that the almanac predicted more snow for our area and another bitter storm in March.
I was wondering if farmers and ranchers read the Farmers Almanac?
If they did, then they would be better prepared for the next winter storm and lessen the loss of their livestock. I would like to think that they would anticipate such disasters happening.
It was so sad to hear just how many livestock were lost in the last blizzard.
Hopefully, they will be in a better position to take care of them when the next storm hits in March.
Maybe we should have all farmers and ranchers subscribe to the Farmers Almanac, so they will be more knowledgeable about our weather changes.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:39 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Iraq war


Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

The British reduction in forces is not intended as an example for President Bush to follow, as the Democrats would have it. Neither was the November election intended to be a mandate for defeat, as some suggest. The American people, not the Democrats, are resolved to win in Iraq. However, the mainstream media will stop at nothing to bring down our nation, even it if means supporting no-win resolutions and habeas corpus for enemy prisoners. The British have been a strong ally in the war on terror and we hope they will remain our ally. Notwithstanding, the President is resolved to win, even if the U.S. is left to fight the war alone. In essence, losing is not an alternative.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:38 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Troops vs. terrorists


Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

The mainstream media says it “supports the troops,” but it defends habeas corpus for the terrorist suspects. If the press were supporting the troops, it would hardly be defending habeas corpus for enemy prisoners and calling for our defeat in Iraq. If the liberals had their way, terror suspects would be tried in the same courts as American citizens and given all the rights of such citizens. In essence, it is a terrorist bill of rights. On the other hand, we hear no demands for the defense of our troops. It would seem that the press has it backwards, but then that is hardly surprising, is it?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:37 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

The Rocky


Robert Ryan of Estes Park writes:

A suggestion for Rocky: How about returning to the format of reporting current news and events. Your present book-type stories (i.e., chapter 39, etc.) is a big yawn.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:37 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Paul Campos


Joanne Ross of Sacramento, Calif., writes:

Congratulations on publishing a rational, intelligent columnist like Paul Campos. And kudos for editorial bravery in doing so.
The RMN editors deserve the praise to balance the many uncivil, even vicious comments and letters from right-wing ideologues objecting to Mr. Campos’ column of 02/20/07, “The right’s Ward Churchill.”
Odd that so many of these uncivil commentors have reading comprehension problems, and a feeble grasp of English grammar and spelling. They don’t appear capable of reading a well written newspaper like the RMN.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:36 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Columbus Day


Elizabeth Morgan of Arvada writes:

Glenn Morris has a lot of nerve when he speaks of setting an example for our children. The example he and Sen. Suzanne Williams wish to set is that if you break the law and threaten violence you can get your way. For every historian and theologian he finds to condemn Columbus, I can find one that attested to his honor and courage. I can also find historians who reported that the so-called atrocities that Columbus is blamed for,pale in comparison to the atrocities that the native people-inflicted upon each other. They should join in honoring Columbus if for no other reason than he helped end the slaughter that native peoples routinely imposed upon each other.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:35 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Global warming


Bill Horton of Fort Collins writes:

Could Al Gore send over a couple of his global warming “scientists” to shovel the snow in my yard? It’s an Inconvenient Truth that it’s been there, unmelted, for two months now.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:34 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

New dollar coin


Larry Hoffenberg of Evergreen writes:

"The Washington coin is gold . . .” It may be gold colored, but it sure isn’t “gold.”

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:33 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Democratic convention coverage


Pam Gency of Denver writes:

I caught Todd Hartman’s article in the Friday, January 12, 2007 issue on page 26A, listing five questions regarding the convention (who asked them it doesn’t say) and what peoples’ concerns are when Denver hosts the democratic convention.
An obvious concern is the traffic, and another reasonable concern is airport accessibility. I can even understand why someone would question what impact the event would have, if any, on taxpayers and TV schedules.
What threw me was the question about a “favorite strip club being overrun.” You mean to tell me that there were no additional questions — more appropriate ones that would answer the wider population’s concerns about the impact the event would have on residents’ every day lives?! As if, first of all, there is an “entitlement” by the question-poser in particular and to men in general to all thing “sex related.” Second, everyone knows what escort services are for. I thought prostitution was illegal in Colorado! The response is so matter-of-fact in its reply involving the exploitation of the female gender. What about the wives and girlfriends back home who’s significant others will be in Denver for the convention, frequenting strip clubs and arranging for sex through an escort service? Is there no shame? No fidelity?
So it sounds like Denver’s sex business will see a boon thanks to the married, engaged or involved men who will most likely lie or lie about cheating and participating in this seedy, illegal activity while here in August 2008.
And guys wonder why women don’t trust them and think they’re pigs.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:32 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Iraq war


Tom Cooley of Parker writes:

The Rocky summarizes the nonbinding resolution passed by the House ("House rejects Bush’s surge,” page 24-NEWS, Saturday): “The House measure disapproves of Bush’s decision to increase troop strength, and pledges that Congress will ‘support and protect’ the troops.” Yes, we must always “support the troops.” It’s become a mantra.
To those who say they “support the troops” but oppose the war: If you believe the troops are carrying out an immoral purpose, why would you support them? You would want the troops to stop what they are doing and leave the place where they are doing it. You’d hardly want to keep their morale high. If the pro-war crowd must demand illogic on the part of their opponents, something is wrong with their case. The debate should be over the nature and purpose of the war. Leave the troops out of it. The only support they are due is a trip home.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:31 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Iraq


Marvin Collier of Denver writes:

Help me get this straight, the U.S. Government has lost twelve billion dollars in cash currency, shipped by air from the U.S. to Iraq. Filmed and documented by T.V. news cameras. Sounds like Clint Eastwood's movie "Kelly's Hero's." Twelve billion dollars, Whooosh!
After Saddam’s overturn, truck van trailers were displayed lined up for over a block, stacked from floor to ceiling, forward and aft with pallets tightly wrapped $100.00 bills. Palace base - stacked with gold bars, gold water fixtures, gilden gold everywhere. Whooosh!
Now Bush wants a trillion dollars to bail out Iraq, excuse me, am I missing something here? To aptly coin a phrase from a rock albumn, "we gotta get out of this place." No more money, no more soldiers. Whooosh!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:31 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Ban an outrageous violation of liberty

Now that the people of Colorado have had a chance to observe the consequences of the smoking ban passed last year, the issue needs to be seriously reviewed.
Proponents of the smoking ban use the premise that they are acting on behalf of nonsmoking patrons and employees of mom-and-pop bars and private clubs such as the VFW, Elks, Moose and others. The logic behind this government nannyism doesn’t wash.
Even though I’m a potential patron, I choose to not frequent many establishments for personal reasons, safety and health concerns among them. As a potential employee, I choose not to seek certain employment for the same reasons.
Likewise, owners and proprietors of legally operating establishments should not have a basic part of their businesses abolished due to rules made up by some mother hens in the government.
I am a fully grown adult and I should be allowed to choose what legal activities I allow in my establishment, who I want to patronize and who I choose to work for, without government interference.
The smoking ban is an outrageous violation of our personal freedom of choice!

Stan Broyles, Idaho Springs

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (229) | TrackBack

Questions for foe of Columbus Day

On Feb. 2, I read Glenn Morris’ Speakout column, “Time has come to repeal Columbus Day.”
This is the same Glenn Morris who in 1993 stated “We will never allow another Columbus Day parade in Denver.” I and many others were appalled with the use of the word “allow.” This is America.
This is the same Glenn Morris who sat in a meeting hall with Italian-Americans and a very well respected Indian named Richard Tallbull, and never responded when Tallbull pointed his finger at him and stated, “You do not represent my people.”
This is the same Glenn Morris who, when asked to meet with the Italian-American community and give us indisputable proof supporting his allegations about Columbus, never responded to our request.
It is well known this dispute is an undeclared war against the European white man for coming to these shores.
My questions for Morris — who professes he is a spokesperson for the Native Americans: Are those people on the reservations better off today because you are protesting our parade? Why don’t you spend quality time with the children on the reservations? Then you will be doing something constructive and not spewing hate in these troubled times.

Mickie Lava Clayton, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Lauding emergency contraception bill

I was glad to hear that Sen. Betty Boyd’s bill requiring that hospitals tell sexual assault survivors about emergency contraception (EC) is likely to become law. I find the opposition quoted in your article to be puzzling.
Since EC is 90 percent effective at preventing pregnancy and more than half of pregnancies resulting from rape end in abortion, I would hope that an ardent abortion opponents would support telling women about this medication. Religiously affiliated hospitals would neither have to prescribe nor dispense EC since Plan B is now available from pharmacies without a prescription. The Catholic Church did not voice any opposition at the Senate hearing.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ bulletin “Acute Care of Sexual Assault Victims” states “Emergency contraception should be offered to all victims of sexual assault.” All Coloradans should support this compassionate measure.

Dr. Andrew Ross, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Court-martial crucial

I ask the Rocky Mountain News to please increase its coverage of the court-martial of 1st Lt. Ehren Watada (“Officer refuses orders to Iraq,” Feb. 6). Every U.S. soldier is instructed that they must refuse to obey an illegal order. Watada refused to obey what he considered an illegal order, yet is being prevented from using that defense in his court-martial.
By preventing the true reason for Watada’s conduct from being the heard, Army officials are being sophisticated and clever but they are betraying our country, our soldiers and themselves.
We will find out if our military has been transformed from defenders of the United States into mindless, order-following mercenaries that from time to time get out of control.

Bruce Baker, Thornton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (20) | TrackBack

We’re all better off from ‘old warming’

Global warming has finally been confirmed for us by Al “The Gullible” Gore and his friend Jacques Chirac who blame it all on George Bush.
I somehow had the impression that it began about 10,000 years B.B. (Before Bush) when the great glaciers covered most of North America north of the 40th parallel. (For those of you in The Peoples Republic of Boulder, that is Baseline Road.)
This “old warming” has been a great boon to the 150 million Americans and 25 million Canadians who live on land exposed by the melting ice. Left behind are five wonderful Great Lakes and millions of acres of beautifully sculptured land dotted with freshwater lakes, lovely forests and fields full of grain.
We are not sure what the rise in “mean sea-level” was that resulted from all this melting, but we are certain that people somehow learned to thrive in a world forever changed for the better.

Jim Parker, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Err on side of safety

Seems kind of ridiculous to be arguing over whether global warming is happening or not. I’m persuaded, but, like going into Iraq, I sincerely hope I’m wrong. In any case, isn’t it better to err on the side of safety instead of waiting until it is too late? Besides, you can’t tell me that all of this pollution can be good for you anyway.

Jerry Minerich, Westminster

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (24) | TrackBack

Dustup over Pelosi’s plane is history

I don’t know about the rest of the country, but I am over the fake controversy ginned up by certain right-wing media elements over Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s alleged aircraft request. The fact of the matter is that the House sergeant at arms (who is responsible for the speaker’s security) — and not the speaker herself — requested a plane that could fly nonstop from Washington, D.C., to California for security purposes, which necessitates a larger plane.
While it is true that former Speaker Dennis Hastert used a smaller jet for his travel, it is also true that the plane used was capable of reaching his district in Illinois without refueling. Isn’t Pelosi entitled to the same level of security?
Why is this controversial? It’s not unless you are looking for a convenient way to smear a Democratic speaker of the House. Even Tony Snow, White House press secretary, has gone on record as saying that this brouhaha is “unfair to the speaker.”
Now can we get back to talking about important things like, oh, I don’t know — Iraq?

Mitch Woolhiser, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Bush kids avoid duty

It was recently reported that Prince Harry, third in line to the British crown, is being deployed to Iraq. According to the Daily Mirror: “Prince Harry is being sent to Iraq after making it clear he was not willing to sit out the war in safety while his comrades risked their lives.”
The article goes further — the prince is not doing desk duty, but will be deployed in the combat zone as leader of a troop of 12 soldiers spending days or weeks on desert missions along the Iran-Iraq border.
Among nieces, nephews and daughters, there are 10 Bush kids — where are they?
They are not only not in Iraq, they aren’t even in the military — what does this say about the Bush commitment to this war?

Peter Liggett, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

February 26, 2007
School vouchers


Ian VanBuskirk of Denver writes:

In relation to: Hot Topic on 2/19/06 regarding Utah’s school vouchers Letter: In a statement from a PFAW representative, Tanya Clay House, regarding the voucher program in Utah, she states: “Children will not benefit from this program. Vouchers have always been about ideology and not education. We’ve never seen a shred of credible evidence that shows school vouchers actually help students learn. While all public schools must demonstrate success under No Child Left Behind, private schools are not held to the same level of accountability for their performance. The House of Representatives has chosen to blindly dole out taxpayer money, and it’s the students who will pay the price.
“Every child deserves an excellent education, not just those who can get admitted to a private school. A vote in favor of this legislation is a vote against public education.”
House flatly contradicts herself. First, she states that “private schools are not held to the same level of accountability for their performance.” (She leads us to believe that because they are not held accountable, they are worse and “the students will suffer.") But then in the next sentence, she states, “Every child deserves an excellent education, not just those who can get admitted to a private school.” (Thus, conceeding with this statement that private schools tend to provide excellent education).
The one true sentence in her statement is that, “Vouchers have always been about ideology and not education.” How true! In her own words, she is fighting to prevent all students from having the option of attending a private school, which tend to provide “an excellent education.” It is a sad day when “people for the american way,” beholden to a powerful lobby, are working against an “excellent education” for ALL American children.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:56 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

DeBoer neighborhood

Michael Ome Untiedt of Denver writes:

I am writing in regards to a statement made by Ms. Kathleen MacKenzie at the February 14th Denver Blueprint Meeting of Denver City Council. When taking her turn to cast a vote in favor of moving the DeBoer Property on east Iliff Avenue forward to City Council as a designated Historical District her reasoning was such: by making it a district designation, by necessity combing three property owners, the two owners originating the designation, and the DeBoer/Wright Family opposing the designation, this “group of three” would now represent a non hostile designation of the property because two thirds of the property owners were in favor of said designation, versus a hostile designation when only one family opposing designation, the DeBoer/Wright Family Trust was facing designation because an historic site designation would only affect their property. Disregarding the fact that the DeBoer/Wright Family Trust, when compared with the two other families owning property in the suggested Historic District, OWNS 73% OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, Ms MacKenzie has made a fallacious statement that has rendered her argument invalid.
One cannot utilize the falsehood of composition when supporting an induced argument. By this I mean that Ms MacKenzie cannot take two things of different nature, in this case two families that favor historical designation and views the process as non-hostile, and one family that opposes historical designation and views the process as hostile, combine them together and state that the combined group now reflects the values of the majority, and that it is valid and truthful to do so FOR ALL PARTIES CONCERNED. This is a fundamental flaw in reasoning, using the fallacy of composition.
The simple act of combining entities of dissimilar nature does not guarantee that those entities will alter and change their nature based on the combining of them What Ms. Mackenzie has accomplished in making this statement is to create a falsehood of the most fundamental nature, I must assume to make the HOSTILE nature of the Historical Designation of Wright Family Trust property more palpable when cloaked in the false implication that the application process now can be viewed in a non-hostile role.
It is a shameful act when an elected official uses fallacies and falsehoods coupled with double talk to forward a position and/or idea. My fear is that this faulty logic will be used in support of his application process, so that supporters may brand the historical designation of the Wright Family Trust property a non- hostile designation. There is value in doing so, in that the Denver City Council has NEVER voted to support a hostile historical landmark designation when the property owners in question did not support the designation. Ms MacKenzie evidently sees value in manipulating a non-hostile appearance to the attempts of stripping the Wright Family Trust of their rights to due process and private property rights, in their opposition to the hostile historical designation of their property. She does so though it violates the most basic rules of reasoning and truth.
I ask that all city council members vote down the application for historical district for the DeBoer property on East Iliff Avenue, and end this travesty.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:55 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Campos, Reynolds & Churchill


Michael Trimble of Littleton writes:

Paul Campos says that Glenn Reynolds, a “well know University of Tennessee law professor” is the right-wing equivalent of Ward Churchill (The right’s Ward Churchill, 02/20/07). Let’s have a quick look at that, shall we?
Ward Churchill essentially supported the fire-bombing a business building (after the fact), using passenger jets as fire-bombs. The people who perpetrated this event had no control over who would be on the jets or in the building the targeted. Indeed, because the very purpose of this sort of terrorism is best served when the casualties are more sympathetic figures, it is reasonable to presume the 9/11 attackers would have preferred to kill as many more women and children as possible, in addition to the adult, male businessmen that died in that conflagration. The more victims, the better, and the more sympathetic, better yet. Glen Reynolds suggested killing specific targets, individuals who, he and many other people believe, are political or technological threats to this country. Specifically, political leaders (because in militant Islamic societies, religion IS politics) and scientists working on the development of nuclear bombs.
Churchill celebrated what was, for all intents and purposes, a “surprise attack,” though carried out by a group of people who identified themselves by their religion rather than by their national citizenship. Reynolds suggested that this country should be responding to the hostile acts against our military personal which he believes Iran is perpetrating.
Churchill said those who were killed on 9/11 deserved it, simply because they were participating in businesses which support the military by paying taxes. Reynolds makes no effort to say the targets of his recommendation “deserve” to die; only that it would serve American interests if they were killed.
Religious leaders because it would soon be clear that speaking out in favor of jihad and terrorism against America is decidedly less healthy than, for example, smoking. Nuclear scientists because that would obviously delay the development of nuclear weapons.
Churchill supported the attack by 9/11 terrorists on his own country.
Reynolds supports defending his own country (note that he has not said that the US military should be assassinating Muslim leaders in, for example, India. While Campos appears to believe that Iran is not attacking America or Americans either directly or by proxy, our military in Iraq seems quite sure they are).
Glen Reynolds is a right-wing Ward Churchill? Hardly. Reynolds appears to me to be a man who decries the wholesale slaughter of civilians whose primary offense is being born into and then remaining a citizen and resident of the wrong country. That’s why he spoke to the idea of targeting specifically people who move Iran towards direct conflict with America, rather than saying something like “Hey, we’ve GOT the nukes. Incinerate Tehran and see how much trouble Iran gives us after that!”
And by the way, Ward Churchill called the people killed in the Twin Towers “little Eichmans,” equating them with Nazis. In regard to Reynolds’ comments, Paul Campos is the one comparing someone to Nazis.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:54 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Funerals coverage

Robyn Hill of Centennial writes:

Are we so soon to stop covering the funerals of our fallen military? I was with hundreds of others in Longmont in December for the funeral of Navy Hospital Corpsman Christopher Anderson. Since then, there have been funerals for three others. One other was a private service.
At Anderson’s funeral, there were dignitaries and lots of news coverage. Not all families want that much attention circling around them in such a difficult time. But I, along with dozens of others, went to Tech. Sgt. Timothy Weiner’s funeral yesterday. The protesters from Westboro Baptist Church were there along with a counterprotest group calling themselves Metalheads for America and the Patriot Guard Riders.
I am proud to be a part of the PGR! But this isn’t about us or the protesters. It is about our fallen heroes! What makes one funeral more or less newsworthy than another? I hope that, in the future, when a member of the military has a funeral anywhere in Colorado, the Rocky will cover it. That is the least journalists can do to show respect for the men and women protecting their right to freedom of the press.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:53 PM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Love & compassion


Patricia Shagena of Highlands Ranch writes:

Hip-hop is poetry that heals those that live it, and those who don’t (writers for newspapers, etc.), feel the spirit of healing that is Art.
Ludikrus makes this 64 year old babygranny laugh at what we are doing - ho, ho - to our young women. The kulture is what it is, and we are here to fix it together, and we are. Dancing and singing to our collective misery and gratitude is as ancient as fire. When we are pursuing happiness, we are dong our job and filtering misery that results in the better society that we have today. What JW did for the Old West, musical genius’ (yes, they are!) are doing for those of us who are dealing with our own myths/mess’.
Same with violent TVl... could it be that Everyman is VERY involved in the nature of conflict, that we have a built in beacon that seeks peace and contentment for the entire worldwide herd. We process archetypes through the art of acting, and we change them when they illuminate us. Kids cartoons are full of situations that need solving (PBS), and extreme conflict (Toon Disney!). That is what we are mired within now in Iraq, and it is all ment to get the the Heart of our Matter.
The Iraqi War, and any wars, anywhere, exist so we can eventually learn to access our powers of Love and Compassion for each other, inclluding the President and the people we disagree with, because it is just a fact of Life, not only Theology, that we will eventually use those aspects to get where we are going, and Now is a great time to start. Send help and hope to everyone in conflict now, and don’t denigrate GW anymore; watch what happens.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:51 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

RTD oath


Jeffrey S. Ryan of Breckenridge writes:

Letter writer Lance Gillis ("God is partof our American heritage,” Letters, 22 February 2007) may know his Bible, but he clearly doesn’t understand the U.S. Constitution, or the intent of the founders.
Mr. Gillis complains about an RTD employee who was disturbed that the oath of office for the RTD makes a reference to God. Mr. Gillis asserts that the American Revolution was fought by “believers in God,” whom he obviously equates solely with Christians.
The constitution, the governing documentof our nation, was purposely written to establish a secular government. God is nowhere mentioned in the constitution, nor is Christianity. The framers were clear that government was to neither favor nor disapprove of any partticular religion. John Adams, in fact, signed a treaty that stated the the U.S. was “not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.” Nor is it true that the founders of the nation were all Christians. Franklin, Jefferson and Washington were Deists, not Christians. Ethan Allen was an atheist. The “Christian prayer” Mr. Gillis attributes to George Washington was long ago exposed as a fraud. In fact, Washington never mentioned Christ in any of his writings.
The constitution forbids the use of religious oaths for public office. The RTD employee not only had every right to complain about the use of God in the oath of office. He was right. God does not belong in any governmental oath.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:50 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Concealed weapons permits


Gary Richardson of Northglenn writes:

The senators pushing bill 34 need to do some genuine research, and cease acting on emotion alone. The state of Florida does not purvey concealed handgun licenses over the internet. They do allow you to request a concealed handgun permit application package via the web, which includes the application, a blank fingerprint card that must be completed by a law inforcement agency, an affidavit that you must sign certifying that you are a legal citizen, are not a convicted felon, have never been judged mentally unfit and understand the firearms laws. this must all be notarized. They also require that proof of firearms training be furnished. Florida then puts the applicant through a background check that is even more extensive than the one Colorado requires.
I posess a Colorado permit and a Florida permit. The reason for this is that I formerly resided in Florida, go there a few times a year to visit friends and family, and want to be legal in all the states between here and there. More states recognize Florida’s permit than recognize Colorado’s.
I am skeptical that people are getting out of state permits to circumvent Colorado law. They are getting them because they are cheaper to get and to renew, and because of the firearms training requirement. Especially veterans. In Colorado, a veteran’s military firearms training counts only if they have been out less that 3 years. Do you really think veterans (especially those of us with combat experience) have forgotten our training? In Florida, they accept an Honorable Discharge or a DD-214 as proof of firearms knowledge. Florida respects military veterans Colorado appears not to. And in Colorado, you have to recertify every time you renew, and that class costs a minimum of $100.00 when you initially apply for a permit and each time you renew, in addition to the permitting costs. The need to retake that hundred-dollar class over and over again is a hassle, and It is expensive.
What about all the people who already have an out of state permit that they paid hard-earned money for? Are you, with the stroke of a pen, going to invalidate all of those licenses, and in effect, throw their money down the drain? That is not going to set well with a lot of voters the next time elections come around. People tend to remember political actions that cost them money The solution is so simple that with all of the emotional posturing going on, it has been missed by all. Colorado and Florida have a reciprocity agreement whereby each recognizes the other’s permits. ( look on the Colorado Bureau of Investigation website. It is there for all to view.) Colorado need only to amend the agreements with other states, requiring that all information pertaining to an applicant be forwarded by the state in which the application is being made, to the appropriate Colorado law enforcement agencies. Additional information requirements could also be added to insure that every tidbit of information that an applicant provides to get a Colorado permit would have to be provided to Colorado by the state issuing the out-of-state permit.
The state of Colorado needs to make the existing reciprocity agreements with other states function in a manner that satisfies the needs of law enforcement without punishing law-abiding citizens. After all, if we were really trying to circumvent Colorado law, would we even bother to get a permit to begin with? It doesn’t make much sense that someone would skirt the law to comply with it. Please. Drop this unfair and unneeded bill.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:49 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Mean people

Nancy Ramsey of Erie writes:

Today was another one of those days, where I find myself wondering why? Why would God leave Nolan, my son, here if his little heart is to be broken so much, if it is not enough that he has to endure so much physical pain, but that he must endure something I think can be even more painful, the ignorance of people. Last week it was seven year olds, I can almost excuse them, because of their age and maybe they have not been taught not to deliberately be mean to someone, but for an adult with children to be so ignorant and hateful to a four year old child and to have no remorse is unacceptable. I do not understand, I know life is not fair, life is hard, but I have not been able to let this go. My son was hurt, although he doesn’t really know all the commotion was about him or that what really happened was bad. I on the other hand hurt for him, my heart was wounded today and I have grieved. I have grieved for the other hateful, mean spirited people out there that my son will com e into contact with over the years. I have grieved for his life that will never be normal (or what we call normal) , for the hardships he will endure because he is different, I have grieved for myself today for all the days I will have to wipe Nolan’s tears, because one more person has been thoughtless and hurtful. Why does it have to be so hard? Nolan was diagnosed with MPS I or Hurler Syndrome when he was nine months old. The only known treatments are enzyme replacement or Bone Marrow Transplantation/Cord blood Transplant, our options were few and we chose Cord Blood because it gave the best long term outcome if you could live through the process. Nolan and I lived at Duke Medical Center for six months while he got his transplant, he coded twice while we were there, coming close to death two times. Nolan is a very lovable and sweet child, he his about a year to a year and a half delayed. Nolan wears glasses and looks a little different from other children. All Hurler kids have puffy cheeks, flatter noses, thick eyebrows, big eyes, their tongues stick out, most have a little hump on their backs, slightly clawed fingers, and they all look very similar. To me he really doesn’t look any different than my other two children; he is my cute little Nolie.
The ignorance of people astounds me. We were at a local restaurant on Sunday February 18th; we go to lunch here almost every Sunday after church with 20 or so of our friends from Church. My Son Nolan was just being Nolan, talking to everyone, walking around the table. He was just returning from the bathroom with a friend from church, there was a lady and a little girl walking in front of him and he was talking to the little girl and he grab the edge of the ladies coat the lady turned and shoved Nolan off her to the floor, several people witnessed this, Nolan was sitting with the Pastor and his wife at the opposite end of the table from my husband and I, the lady than proceeded to tell our Pastor that he should watch the Miracle Worker and gave he and his wife a nasty look. Our Pastor got up f rom the table and followed her back to her table and asked her what she meant by that comment. She told him that handicapped children need to know how to behave. Some other comments were m ade. He told her Nolan was only four and he was only trying to play. She said everyone with us saw him attacking her. He said he thought that she was rude and she stood up and shoved our Pastor. I did not know what was going on until he came back to the table. The only thing I knew was a grown woman had shoved my child to the floor. It was probably a God thing that I did not go over, because after I found out what had happened I was fit to be tied, than as the day wore on my anger became hurt and disbelief. I still can not believe a woman with children would say such hateful things about an obviously special child. What kind of person could live with themselves and what is she teaching her children Earlier that morning while in Sunday school a young man at our church spilled his coffee all over me. This young man is a grown up Nolan, he is a nine year old in a 25 year old body, but he is the sweetest man you would ever meet and he would do anything for you. He was so apologetic for spilling his coffee, not once but twice, after the second spill he said of himself that he was “so stupid”; I turned and said no, no everyone spills. I had on brown pants and the coffee just blended in so I laughed and told him I was fine that you couldn’t even tell, I just smelled nice, like a good cup of coffee. My point being after the incident at lunch I reviewed my actions toward this young man and I hope that I was genuine while accepting his apology and hope that I made myself clear that everyone has accidents an d that he was not stupid. My heart went out to him, because for him to think himself stupid indicates to me that he has heard someone say that to him. I hope Nolan never thinks himself stupid for any reason and woe to the person that tells him he is. I hope to always be an example to my children of how Christ would react in these situations. Weather you are a Christian person or not, human compassion and decency are vital for our society. No one chooses to be different. What if life had dealt the woman at lunch the same hand? How would she react then? Always try to remember it could be you with a child with special needs o r a terminal illness. God sees us all the same, no one is better because he can talk plain or walk straight or see without glasses. We are all in this world together why can we not try to get along? With each incident of someone making fun, or saying mean things or even the stares from strangers my skin becomes a little tougher, and maybe someday the comments won’t even phase me.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:48 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

DeBoer neighborhood


Catherine Potts of Denver writes:

Honorable Mayor Hickenlooper and Members of City Council, I appreciate you reading my letters and I understand it’s a quasi-judicial situation. I am compelled to send a letter when I see something that I feel should be addressed.
I am S.R. DeBoer’s youngest Great Granddaughter and AGAINST the blatantly hostile act of designating my respected family’s entire property. In reading the letters submitted to the City Council from members of the community that support the hostile designation, I find several things curious about what is stated in their letters.
A lot of people are saying that they moved to the area because of my Great Grandfather. I find it very hard to believe that they really even knew who my Great Grandfather was before the Lafons began their selfish crusade to essentially steal our family’s property rights.
These people cannot all say that they moved here or to Denver SOLEY because of what my Great Grandfather did. Sure, I’m positive it played a role (without them knowing), but rarely is the case that a regular citizen knows who it was that designed things over a half-century before.
I also find it offensive that it’s OK for the rest of the community to send letters in to support of such a hostile district (without knowing the whole story) just because they “like walking by and seeing the trees.” How is that OK? I guess I’ll go ahead and chime in on what I think other people should do with their property just because I like walking by. I’m not trying sound sarcastic, but you’ve got to see through the ridiculous reasoning and that all the letters are following a similar “company line” in order to provide continuity and belonging so you’ll designate our property. I also find questionable their claim that their property values and quality of life will suffer. So I guess it’s their quality of life over ours? So we have to be financially destroyed because they like walking by?
All the letters you receive that are for designating our property really are painting our property to be something spectacular. It’s really just a smidge over an acre and not the Garden of Eden it’s being made out to be. Sure, “The Office” at 515 East Iliff is unique. But is it a significant example (as required by the Landmark ordinance)? I invite you, again, to please visit our property. Take a walk around. See that it is in dire need of attention. We’ve done a lot over the years to keep it up, but it’s simply too much. If this property is to be designated, what value will it be if we can’t take care of it? Who will carry that financial burden? We are running out of money and nobody seems to care. Remember the Field House? It was designated historical and just sat there for YEARS in Harvard Gulch Park before burning down finally. I remember growing up, wondering what was going to become of it. Nothing ever did because the City didn’t put the money in it. So you can see that a small family that can’t even afford the upkeep now, won’t be able to if it’s designated. It seems that the members of the community don’t really care about that part of it, but for us it’s very real. It’s a burden the community is willing to place on us I guess. It’s unfortunate the that affect on us isn’t really a consideration.
Aside from the one building at 515 East Iliff, nothing else is really appopriate for designation. The neighborhood wants our entire piece of land because they don’t want anything built. Plain and simple. It’s been stated by them as I’ve mentioned in previous letters. It’s better for them that the entire application can be entertained in City Council because then they have more of a chance that the entire district will be approved. Nevermind that it was totally rejected by Planning because it’s thoroughly hostile and that the Landmark Commission only sent the modified application of “The Office” at 515 East Iliff.
I hope you notice, as we have, that when the results aren’t what the applicants want they just write it off and somehow the entire application gets forwarded on by their connections in the Landmark office. They minimize the role of the Landmark Commission on their website, deboeroasis.com, and say they are a citizen board, while the staff is professional. Such is the case when they are giving the Landmark STAFF more credit for a decision as opposed to the PROFESSIONAL volunteers on the commission. How is it that the Landmark staff can pass on the entire application time after time, ignoring any suggestions made by BOTH the PROFESSIONAL Landmark Commission and the PROFESSIONAL Planning Board? Aren’t members of both groups brought on because they are highly respected in their fields of expertise? I’m not really clear as to why the Landmark Commission and Planning Board even exist if the staff can just do what it wants. I need some clarity...
They’ve really gotten a lot of people on their side due to a lot of lying and lying by omission. It’s a lynch mob mentality at this point.
People have been led to believe we are not only tree killers, but fox killers and historical building haters as well. This community is really being torn apart by the hostility. To me, the entire meaning of what it is to save something historical as been damaged. This never had to be hostile. We aren’t bad people and things are being said that are simply not true. I certainly hope that it’s not the sheer numbers of letters you get that help you make your decision. I hope it’s based in what is right and what is wrong that helps you make your decision. It is not right that any member of the Denver community (let alone an entire family) should be put through what our family has been put through over the past year.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:47 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

CU minorities


Scott R. Nelson of Aurora writes:

Re: CU Minorities feel isolated, some say.
I read this article in disbelief. I cannot believe that in today’s society that minorities continue to complain about what whites are or are not doing. It seems as if whites can do no good, no matter what they do.
What minorities don’t seem to realize is that whites don’t get involved because they’re scared to say anything. Any time a white speaks regarding someone or some group with darker skin, there are problems. There is constant backlash against any white for saying anything that could possibly be construed as offensive. Not only do whites risk being expelled from school for offending a minority, the school itself can, and often is held liable for such actions – since they are obviously unable to promote and ensure a comfortable and fair environment.
Mario Flores observed white students reading an article about racism and was perturbed by the fact that whites “seemed uninterested.” How did Mr. Flores know what they were reading? Furthermore, what did he expect as a reaction? Did Mr. Flores observe any other minority groups reading this article? What was their reaction? Did a “walkout” of all minorities from class ensue? And what did he expect the white students to do when he got in their faces with it? Would that not seem uncomfortable to have anyone do to him? Who’s going to open up in a situation like that?
Why is it that Graciela Najera thinks that a group of minorities sitting together is any different than a group of white people sitting together? How often do the minorities wave over the whites to come join them? She said it herself, that they’re all in there doing the same thing. She also asked, “why do people get upset over a group of black people eating and talking?” My question is, why are you upset over a group of white people eating and talking. Aren’t they “doing the same thing?
Minorities don’t make whites feel any more welcome in these situations than the other way around. What is it exactly that minorities expect of whites? They want them to attend the events sponsored by minority student organizations; yet, they would be the first people to blow a gasket at even the mention of a white student organization.
Minorities have brought this isolation upon themselves with the belief that whites owe them all something. Although whites may be the majority, they are not allowed to have groups, meetings, funds, organizations, parties, fraternities, or colleges dedicated to whites. Somehow, minorities have turned that into a perception of racism and discrimination. Yet, it’s OK for them to practice it and move up in life with the help of Affirmative Action. Minorities discriminate against whites in a fashion far more extreme than they realize, and then wonder why they feel isolated by them. It’s pretty clear to me.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:46 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Iraq war


Jerry McHugh Jr. of Denver writes:

Shame on those members of Congress who voted to “support the troops” but not the plans to send 21,500 additional troops to support existing troops and implement the security plan proposed by the President and our commanders in the field. Not only is it treasonous that the Congress has taken this step, but I find it disgusting that political leaders would sabotage American efforts to affect law and order in that part of the world. Every time I hear these “supporters” of American troops, against this war it’s dawned on me that they want America to loose and to be humiliated because of their disdain for President Bush and the reasons we got in this war. While America has made many mistakes and had numerous setbacks, it is imperative that our resolve not waiver when the going gets tough. Every time I hear Hillary, Harry, Nancy, John Murhta and others speak on this issue it reminds me of a gaggle of cheerleaders for the insurgents, cheerleaders for fanatic Islamists to prevail over our America’s plan and commitment. I see them in cheerleader outfits with pom poms, dancing, jumping and shouting for the failure of America in Iraq; elated by the success of our irrational enemies. Our enemies do not want the rule of law; they do not want peace and freedom. Our enemies want to terrorize, to kill non-Muslim “infidels", not matter who or where they are. One of their insane tactics are to utilize the disenfranchised to murder “infidels” AND themselves. While the Democratic cheerleaders plead on the air-waves enlisting support for this confrontation to end to our enemies satisfaction, most Americans idly sit by watching this interesting game as our troops serve our country doing the dirty work. America has committed to do the heavy lifting and this is not the time to quit.
Murtha’s plan to “slow-bleed” the funding of war effort is yet another treasonous example of his cheerleader support of America’s enemies.
Shame on the Congress for using our troops as pawns in their political machinations. As the most powerful nation in the world it is America’s responsibility to stand up to the enemies who are out to destroy freedom. If it is not America to lead against these enemies, then who will?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:45 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Medical insurance


Jim Lowry of Arvada writes:

Senator Keller: It has been my longstanding dream to strike out on my own and become self-employed. As I write this, I am on the verge of actually doing so.
For this reason, I was disheartened to learn that the state was considering new legislation that would have the effect of raising my “taxes,” again.
In anticipation of my resignation — and the termination of employee-related benefits — I have investigated and am planning to purchase an independent medical insurance plan. Depending on specific coverage for disability, elected deductibles and other variables, a very good term policy will cost me something in the range of $165.00 per month.
If the above billSenate Bill 193 passes into law, I will be required to purchase THE SAME THING as part of my automobile insurance policy!!! Now why would I want to do that?
If there is a problem with trauma centers or emergency response agencies collecting timely payment from providers, then that’s the problem that should be addressed. Whether this delay is due to ineffective invoice coding by providers, the negligence or inefficiency of insurers or some other bureaucratic problem, the answer may lie in standardizing billing procedures, legislating bill processing times or even tort reform.
Layering additional insurance responsibilities and costs onto auto owners simply creates redundancy, it does not address the problem.
Should this pass, the insurance providers will actually benefit from their failure to make timely payments — while my cost of living increases.
My understanding is that this bill has been referred to committee. If and when it comes to vote, I would urge you to vote against it.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:44 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

School closure


Santiago Lopez, administrator of the Life Skills Center of Denver, writes:

Regarding the DPS decision to close Life Skills after this school year
To all concerned: It is with great disappointment that the Denver Public School Board voted 6-1 to close the doors of Life Skills Center of Denver. As the administrator for the past year, I have been able to see a major change in leadership, management, and overall accountability for the education of the metro area’s most fragile students. Knowing that the students I work with daily have been let down in their previous educational experiences and now the vote of confidence is again letting them down, really is tough to handle. We, as a school staff, are dedicated to the growth of our students both educationally and in life in general. Our focus will continue to be on students and their growth for their future. Please know that as a person that comes from poverty, a graduate of Denver Public Schools, a college graduate twice, a former DPS teacher and a concerned citizen; when it comes to our students that a traditional public school has not worked for, I am committed to choice. I am committed t o making sure we offer an opportunity to students whom have been left behind. This commitment is genuine and is a passion. I want all young people to realize their potential. I am unconventional in my methods and personality. I also know that I connect well with this population because I am unconventional. This is what public education needs, a different way of thinking.
I truly hope that the community really pushes for true reform with their state legislators, state school board members and local school board members. We are all responsible for the education of our young people. Let’s not allow students to be left behind. Respect the child, understand their needs, and work with them to make learning a comfortable and safe experience. Too many of our students have had too many doors closed on them. When will this stop? When will the true problem be looked at? When will a plan be put in place before rendering a decision to put so many students on the streets?&nbs p; After all, aren’t we all educators that are concerned about the same problem? I do wish the decision were different; however I know that our focus will be the same at Life Skills, OUR STUDENTS!!!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:43 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Renewable energy mandate


Gary Jorgensen of Pine writes:

Re: “Co-op wants to opt out of energy bill,” 2/20/07.
I am a member of the IREA coop and I voted for Amendment 37. A lot of my friends and neighbors voted for Amendment 37, too.
In fact, when you look at the final A37 vote tally, the IREA service territory was split about 50/50 on this issue. While this was not a ringing endorsement, it certainly did not presage the slam-dunk opt-out vote that Stan Lewandowski now touts as proof positive that IREA members don’t want renewables. The 50% endorsement of A37 by our coop members also was amazingly positive, given the non-stop barrage of anti-37 propaganda the IREA general manager and Board sent our members through the communication channels they control.
Why did we “vote” to opt out of A37? Because we were bombarded with misinformation using the classic scare tactics: Renewable energy is too expensive! You’ll be sorry! And one memorable statement: “Wind energy will drive you and your neighbors crazy!”
My plea to the Colorado Legislature and Governor Ritter: Please do not abandon the many members of the IREA coop who support clean energy! Please do not abandon the many more in our coop who would support renewables if they were given objective and accurate information so they could make informed decisions!
Governor Ritter and legislators: You are our only voices. Under the current unregulated coop system in Colorado, we have no voice or recourse in our own coop!
Please do not allow the IREA leadership to spend even MORE of our members’ money on another political campaign to defeat a common-sense standard for clean energy!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:42 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Renewable energy mandate


Jerri L. Hill of Parker writes:

Regarding IREA’s position on HB 1281, and as a member of the cooperative, I dispute that its vast membership would not approve of holding this huge utility, the largest in Colorado, and 13th largest in the country, to the same standard on renewable energy as other state utilities. Note that this Republican area voted for Amendment 37. I have confidence that, upon receiving full information, members would agree that the total cost of energy includes health consequences and long-term environmental damage, not to mention penalties, lawsuits, and tax consequences which should be factored in to the price we pay or will pay for dirty energy. The great majority of IREA membership did not vote to opt out of renewable energy requirements of Amendment 37, even after being subjected to a IREA’s propaganda campaign against it. Most of this majority simply did not vote!
Interestingly enough, after being threatened with higher bills if they did not opt out of the Amendment, members noted increased charges and fees on their monthly statements, apparently to fund a new coal fired plant. Many members also were outraged when their money was used to fund a one-sided study against renewables, and/or when IREA offered to allow them to buy renewable energy credits for IREA to claim, after pocketing one half of this credit for themselves. What a deal! I believe most members support HB 1281 and want IREA to enter the realistic 21st Century approach to safe, clean, renewable energy.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:41 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Impeachment

Jonathan Pietarila Graham of Arvada writes:


Open Letter to The Honorable Mark Udall Dear Representative Udall, I want to begin by saying that I read your speech in Congress when you voted to oppose the President’s escalation in Iraq and that it made me proud that you are my Representative.
I am writing now regarding your response to my request that you consider impeaching the President and Vice President. In that letter you stated that it is not clear what constitutes “high crimes and misdemeanors” and that you are not a lawyer nor an expert on impeachment. I am not either but there are lawyers who have considered the case against Bush. For example, Elizabeth de la Vega, a former federal prosecutor, wrote a book, “United States v. George W. Bush et al.” Using only public speeches and official documents she was able to provide ample evidence for probable cause that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice and Powell violated Title 18, United States Code, Section 371. That is, that they conspired to defraud the United States. This is not about being opposed to or supporting the war in Iraq. This is about defrauding the Congress into a war instead of providing it with honest information with which to make its decision.
I cannot think of a higher crime than to defraud a nation into war besides levying war against that nation. Another example is a suit this last August by the ACLU against the NSA over the President’s domestic spying program, Federal Judge Anna Diggs Taylor of the US District Court in Detroit found that the President “undisputedly violated” the First and Fourth Amendments of the Constitution.
Violating the Constitution of the United States of America is another extremely serious crime.
I am at a loss to understand how it can be inappropriate for the House to consider impeaching, or even investigating, the President in light of this information.
This last November, the voters put a Democratic majority in power in Congress. I must say, the first month of that power has been disappointing. When the Republicans have control of the Congress they do not hesitate to use that power, but when the Democrats take control we immediately talk about “healing.” Frankly, I do not think that healing is possible without justice. Many Americans over the last six years have had bumper stickers declaring that “freedom is not free.”
This is certainly the case; someone must protect those freedoms. The Bill of Rights, more than anything else, defines what American freedom is and the very person we entrusted to protect those freedoms, our President, has attacked them. Someone else, in Congress, must do the work to protect our freedoms. They must step up to protect them or they are lost. I do not see how we as Americans can be secure in our freedom if there are no consequences when they are violated. Each and every member of Congress has sworn to “defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” And, yet, it will not consider investigating a President who “undisputedly violated” the First and Fourth Amendments of that Constitution.
Please explain to me how to reconcile those two facts.
Richard Nixon obstructed justice and conducted illegal wiretaps. Bill Clinton was acquitted of perjury. George W. Bush has violated the Constitution and there is probable cause to believe that he defrauded the nation into war. Anything short of the appointment of a special prosecutor and a Congressional investigation is a breach of the trust given to Congress and, ultimately, a failure of our democracy.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:40 PM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Organ donation

Sue Dunn, president and chief executive officer of the Donor Alliance, writes:

Organ donation saves lives. Each year, more than 300,000 Americans are saved through the gift of organ and tissue donation.
Yet despite these statistics, one of the nation¹s most pressing public health issues is the widening gap between the supply and demand for organ and tissue transplants. Each hour another person dies waiting for an organ transplant in the Unites States. In Colorado, there are currently more than 1,700 people waiting for a lifesaving organ transplant. Nationally, 94,692 people are waiting.
The Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA) will bring Colorado law up to date for the first time in almost 40 years, harmonizing the UAGA with federal law, current technology and practice, and advance medical directives. The new legislation will provide for cooperation between procurement organizations, coroners and district attorneys by requiring, for the first time, written agreements and protocols for donors under the jurisdiction of the coroner. It will also reinforce first person consent, where Colorado has been a national leader since 2001.
House Bill 1266, the Revised UAGA, will save lives by improving and adding efficiencies to the current donation system, increasing the number of transplants occurring in Colorado.
Just one donor can save the lives of eight people and enhance the lives of more than 100. HB 1266, which is under consideration in 14 states and anticipated in more than 30 states, will ensure that the wishes of deceased organ donors are fulfilled and that the 1,700 Coloradans waiting for a transplant stand a greater chance of receiving the gift of life.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:39 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

President Bush


Dan Demuth of Pueblo writes:

Regards your article headline on page 30 News in the 2/17/07 edition: “Doctors remove two moles from Bush’s head in biopsy".........did anyone check to see if they were alive? That could explain a lot.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:38 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Abortion


David Cook of Loveland writes:

Open letter to Chief Justice of the Supreme court Honorable Justice Roberts Honorable Justice Roberts, Abortion is not only immoral, it is illegal in the United States of America. No, it is not mentioned in the Constitution because it is more fundamental than that. It is stated outright in the most basic statement of purpose of the Declaration of Independence. “We hold these truths self evident ( that means even I can reason it out) that all me are created (not born) with certain inalienable (God given, not court given) rights, among these are LIFE!
That overrides the constitution because, as you very well know, it is the basis for the Constitution! Simple reason tells any sentient being that if LIFE is not a right, then no other rights matter. This is obviously the primary goal of the Abortion Rights advocates. Any Judge-any Judge, that will not uphold this bedrock statement of American Liberty, should not be in robes, period. By the way, the Founders, you will find, declared that this portion of the Declaration be included as law in this Nation. Since it is so basic, and law, it would be reasonable to postulate that any judge ruling for abortion is, in fact, committing high treason or subversion and should be held accountable accordingly. Failing that, citizens in his sphere should “vigorously pursue” running him or her off the bench any legal way they can. That judge is a mortal threat to the very essence of Liberty and Freedom in this great Nation.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:37 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Gun control

Jim Coleman of Aurora writes:

well, I wondered how long it would take for the democrats to introduce a gun ban bill, and it seems that REP. Joel Judd has come to the rescue! He says he wants to stop the “blood in the streets". Well, REP. Judd, I haven’t seen ANY blood in the streets! I thought that would make the news! Or, mabye you’re just a liar! Perhaps you could provide pictures?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:36 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

RTD oath

Charles Buchanan of Denver writes:

Lance Gillis’ rambling condemnation of RTD Director Dave Ruchman’s efforts to remove the reference to God in the RTD oath of service (2/22/07) reveals his faith to be as shallow as a teaspoon. Only those unsure of their own beliefs attempt to foist them on others in this manner.
The central assertion in his argument- that we are a Christian Nation and the Founding Fathers were all Christians- runs contrary to reality. James Madison, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, and Thomas Paine all wrote things that would evidence Deism over Christianity. The American Revolution he references was fought largely to gain freedom from the tyranny of state-sponsored religion- the likes of which authoritarians like Mr. Gillis would foist upon us.
The writer’s angry tone makes me wonder how closely he has read the Bible he wants us all to swear upon. I doubt Jesus would’ve gained much sympathy if his teaching had included calling skeptics “pantywaist, spineless apologist(s)” as Mr. Gillis calls Dave Ruchman and others who fight to defend religious freedom. Mr. Ruchman’s actions actually epitomize bravery. He fights for the right of others not to swear an oath to a God in which they do not believe, and he does this surely knowing he will be attacked by people like Lance Gillis.
It’s worth noting that state-sponsored religion not only infringes upon our Constitutionally guaranteed liberties, but that it’s the stated goal of Islamist Fundamentalists like Osama Bin Laden, who similarly seek to eliminate anyone not prostrate to their particular religious beliefs. This similarity should give you an indication as to the diabolical nature of Mr. Gillis’ ideas.
Swear oaths to whatever God you want, but I for one will fight to the death to stay free from religious tyranny, just as our Founding Fathers and the brave men at Valley Forge would have wanted.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:35 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Why take chances on global warming?

The Rocky’s Editorial & Opinion section of Feb. 10 illustrated the division that exists in today’s society about global warming: scientists try to raise the alarm, naysayers insist that their opinions are being ignored. What should we do?
Let’s consider the consequences of the two courses of action possible.
Suppose we take measures the scientists advocate, including reducing greenhouse emissions by developing more efficient cars and using renewable energy. Then, say, some years later, the facts show that, by golly, all those “alarmists” warning of global warming were wrong, i.e., temperatures return to normal, ice caps reappear, etc. Has anything been lost? No, in fact, we would have developed new industries and had healthier air.
But if we do nothing and global warming turns out to be real, the consequences will be devastating and possibly irreversible — drinking-water supplies depleted, coastal cities drowned by rising sea levels, deaths from heat waves in summer and cold spells in winter, species eradicated, just to name a few.
No thinking civilization can afford to take that chance.

Janet Brazill, Colorado Springs

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (14) | TrackBack

Volcano pollution cleaned up nicely

Over the last several months, the Rocky Mountain News has “pushed” global warming. In addition, it has implied, if not outright said, that it is caused by man’s pollution. Only a deep degree of historical and scientific ignorance could allow this to happen.
For instance, the eruption of the Krakatoa volcano on Aug. 26, 1883, put far more pollutants in the atmosphere than all of humanity in history. The Earth cleaned that up nicely all by itself, thank you. More recently, Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines in July 1991 and August 1992 did the same, and again the planet took it in stride with no lasting effects. These facts alone make the man-caused global warming myth ridiculous.
Not including these events in their reporting reduces the media’s coverage of climate changes to pure propaganda. The big story is the hiding of these facts by educators and the press, thus keeping the populace ignorant and panic-stricken. Why? Why keep people ignorant of these simple and irrefutable facts? Look a little below the surface and it isn’t to hard to figure, is it?

David Cook, Loveland

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Edwards’ health-care stance is ironic

I’ve been waiting, apparently in vain, for someone to point out the irony of presidential aspirant John Edwards appearing to be the point man on health care.
Edwards made his fortune as a personal-injury trial lawyer by winning huge awards in cases regarding cerebral palsy, supposedly caused by Caesarean-section delivery. The scientific evidence comes down squarely against any direct link, but Edwards has never acknowledged this.
Aren’t unwarranted awards a substantial cause for high medical malpractice insurance rates and consequently high health costs?
I’d feel a lot more open to Edwards’ proposals if he had the guts to own up to, and apologize for, his part in escalating medical costs.
However, he evidently feels that the general public needs to continue to subsidize the trial lawyers in addition to paying for medical care for those who can’t afford it.

Rich Jarboe, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Veteran not spit upon

Ernest M. Duckworth Jr.’s letter of Feb. 15, “They got a funny way of pushing peace,” makes an unsupported claim that an Iraq war veteran was spit on at a recent peace rally in Washington, D.C. I’d like to see some evidence for this hateful claim. When defending the war gets tough, only partisan hacks raise the spit-upon-veteran myth, which was started by hawks defending the Vietnam War.
The Rocky’s job is to promote public discourse by printing letters with valid, legitimate perspectives, not to sow discord with hateful, divisive misinformation. Perhaps the Rocky can make amends by getting “on point” about the cuts in VA benefits and the longstanding lack of armor for our troops.

Kenneth C. Rose II, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (19) | TrackBack

Stand tall, Senator

Senate President Joan Fitz-Gerald leads the charge with the bold battle cry: “We fought for it. We have it. And we will not compromise it. We will fight for it with every fiber of our being” (“Senator urges ban on most abortions, citing civil rights,” Feb. 13).
To Fitz-Gerald and all those who stand with her, I implore you to stand proud and tall! Show what you’re made of! Please finish the sentence. Remove the nebulous “it” and say what you really mean: We fought for the right to kill our babies. We have the right to kill our babies. We will not compromise the right to kill our babies. We will fight for the right to kill our babies with every fiber of our being.

Susan Sutherland, Thornton
Director, Colorado Right to Life

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (26) | TrackBack

Abortion bill a waste

Why were some lawmakers wasting time, money and resources again? (“Senator urges ban on most abortions, citing civil rights,” Feb. 13.) Senate Bill 143 — co-sponsored by Sen. Scott Renfroe, R-Greeley, and Rep. Kent Lambert, R-Colorado Springs — was unconstitutional under Roe v. Wade, which says that state regulations of abortion must include exceptions to preserve the life or health of the mother.
We would all be better served if they spent more energy on ways to prevent unintended pregnancies in the first place.

Robbie Hobein, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (15) | TrackBack

Preserve DeBoer

I want to offer my support for the historical designation of the DeBoer neighborhood.
Retaining a snapshot of our past is critical to fostering respect for building our future.
Thoughtful development might have its place, but it’s not in the DeBoer Historic Neighborhood.

Kim Griffin, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Define ‘emergency,’ oh King Douglas

So, King Douglas Bruce doesn’t think the massive snowstorms Denver has recently endured constitutes a “dire emergency” and that the city’s TABOR reserve should be “virtually untouchable”? (“Icy Denver needs the money, but TABOR reserve is frozen,” Feb. 15.)
Listen, your highness, that is taxpayers’ money in these reserve funds! Mine, and every other taxpayer’s in Colorado, including the ones whose streets are still snow-and-ice-covered or full of potholes.
I believe in taxes. How else are our government programs and services to be financed? There is no logical reason why Denver’s reserve should not be used to clear and repair the damage to the city’s streets caused by these uncommonly powerful snowstorms. While we’re at it, the money in all these funds should also be used for aid to the ranchers and the animals in the southeastern plains.
What exactly does Bruce consider a “dire emergency”? A nuclear explosion? An alien invasion from outer space? Our representatives in our representative government should be able to declare emergencies, and to decide if the reserve funds should be used for said emergencies. Oh, but wait, I forgot — TABOR forbids that course of action. What idiocy.

Marguerite King, Paonia

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

‘Buy your own lunch’

The Rocky article of Feb. 8, “Bill tackles ethics law woes,” concerned the introduction of a legislative bill to fix the obvious problems of Amendment 41 — namely, the unintended consequences of limiting prizes and scholarships and other awards given to public employees.
I don’t think that the voters would disapprove of this kind of clarification, but once again the politicians miss the mark. In the same bill we are told that politicians will be able to accept lunch from a lobbyist just so long as the lobbyist is not intending to influence the politician.
This is nuts. The only reason lobbyists exist is to influence politicians. For those who hold elective office, I think I speak for a large number of people when I say, “Buy your own lunch.”

Bob Payne, Parker

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Unfair, unjust war

If there was discernible progress to be made in Iraq, it would have been made by now. All we see is chaos and civil war. Initially, I believed that we broke it and had to buy it, but, really, the president broke it and servicemen are being asked to buy it ... with their lives. Not fair and not just.

Michael Neil, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

February 24, 2007
Whatever new Rocky is, there’s less of it

I can’t decide whether the new Rocky is trying to be a supermarket tabloid, a Sunday news magazine or a comic book. Bits of all three probably. Whatever it is, it is a lot less.
The color photos are really good and you can whip through the paper really fast. Save lots of time this way. But it has lost quite a bit of its former self.
I wanted to find out what the weather was in Little Rock, Ark., recently. It’s not there anymore. Listings of the stocks and mutual funds I hold were deleted long ago.
I found out Frankie Laine died. The story was in the Rocky. The local Loveland paper has the same Associated Press story, only it is more than twice as long. He was a marathon dancer early in life. The Rocky left that out. The local paper also referred the reader to Frankielaine.com for more info. The Rocky did not.
I guess young people today don’t even know who Frankie Laine was. They know who A.I. and Melo are, however. Is there anything about these two that we don’t know?

J. Bagan, Loveland

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Rocky impresses Brit

I have just returned to London, having spent an enjoyable week with my brother, sister-in-law and young nephew in Colorado Springs.
During my time in America I struggled to find a newspaper that provided a thorough insight into local issues whilst offering informed comment on wider national issues. It was only at Denver’s airport, on my way back to London, that I discovered a copy of the Rocky, and I must say that I was so impressed that I read it cover to cover on the long return flight.
Needless to say, I have told my relations in Colorado that, in my opinion, the Rocky is required reading.

Mark F. Dillon, London

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Young girl’s compassion inspiring

In the Jan. 20 Rocky Mountain News, we saw the usual negative news on the front page. Yes, gangs are a serious problem, and one that must be addressed. However, buried in the paper is some truly good news: 13-year-old Emma Vickland gave the winnings from the sale of her champion hog to the two boys in Berthoud who lost their legs!
That young lady should be an example for all of us. Her demonstration of concern and compassion for others is inspiring. How about putting a good-news story like this on the front page every day instead of more of the same negative ones? The gangs have had their moments of fame, and continuing to promote them on the front page only adds fuel to their fire.
However, I wonder what would happen to our world if we promoted honesty, decency and love of fellow man with stories like Emma’s on the front page of every paper every day?

Gary Landrum, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Thanks for story

Our thanks go out to the Rocky Mountain News and writer Myung Oak Kim for the sensitive and true article the Rocky published on Jan. 23 about the Holocaust survivors living in Denver (“Holocaust survivors hope their stories outlive them”).
It allowed us the opportunity to tell our struggle of survival during the Holocaust and our life in Denver since our immigration here after the end of World War II.
It is a privilege and a responsibility to remember the 6 million Jews who perished in the Holocaust. By telling their story, they will not be forgotten.

Miriam and Fred Hoffman, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Spellbinding

Rocky Mountain News writer Kevin Vaughan was a skilled writer and storyteller when he was a journalist several years ago in Fort Collins, and it’s clear he’s only gotten better. What a spellbinding, descriptive, remarkable work is “The Crossing.” Thanks to everyone involved, including those directly affected by the accident, for sharing it with us.

Mike Vogl, Fort Collins

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Enough already!

Good grief! Enough already about “The Crossing.” The Rocky is supposed to be a newspaper — and the operative word is “news.” To go on endlessly, day after day, about something that happened decades ago is absurd.

Jerome Oakley, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Anna ad nauseam

It would be interesting to know how many hundreds of cumulative hours of televised Anna Nicole Smith coverage has occurred since her death.
Religion may be the opiate of the masses, but television is its crack cocaine.

Steve Flaniken, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

February 23, 2007
Glad to hear another view on climate change

At last we get to hear a dissenting view in the global warming debate! (“A political climate,” Ross McKitrick’s piece of Feb. 10.)
Most of us will never have a chance or the interest to read the entire report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change sponsored by the United Nations. Instead we will be offered alarmist views from panicky journalists. Like us, they haven’t read the report either, but are reacting to the biased summary. As McKitrick pointed out, most of the scientists had no input on it, nor do they all agree with it.
He also points out that it omits mention of the contrary evidence that suggests that the present warming cycle is well within the parameters of earlier natural cycles of warming and cooling stretching back 10,000 years.
Thank you, Rocky Mountain News, for showing us another viewpoint from an insider.

Jim Mulholland, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (52) | TrackBack

Right-wing pedigree omitted

Ross McKitrick, in the lead commentary in the Feb. 10 Rocky Mountain News, suggested that “many” experts disagree with the summary of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report that global warming is very likely due to a human- caused increase in greenhouse gases.
I found it strange that the article didn’t mention McKitrick’s status as a senior fellow at the Fraser Institute, an organization described on the Internet as a “right-wing think tank.”
However, when Rocky media critic Dave Kopel’s article in the same issue recommended reading the Fraser Institute’s dissent of the IPCC work, I thought maybe McKitrick’s relationship with the institute was omitted on purpose, lest the reader be left with the view that disagreement with the IPCC’s summary isn’t as widespread as the Rocky would want us to believe.

Stephen Midson, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Pay attention, Denver

After all these weeks of Denver’s bickering and finger-pointing about snow removal, I’m now watching with interest the aftermath of the dramatic snowfall in upstate New York. I wonder if any of Denver’s administrative staff are paying attention to gain some experience with massive snowfall and the resulting removal.

M.E. Smith, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

February 22, 2007
Smoking ban

Allen Campbell of Colorado Springs writes:

This is to inform you that the people of Colorado are mad as hell and are not going to take it anymore. The legislature has ignored our legitimate arguments: the travesty of hospitality businesses being driven out of business, unemployment and the loss of livelihood by employees and the resulting damage done to their children and grandchildren, the millions of dollars lost in tax revenue, the more millions of dollars that the VFW and other United States Military service clubs have lost and are therefore unavailable to the many charities they’ve historically donated to, and just the plain fact that hundreds of we owners of pubs, Bars and taverns, service clubs and support service companies are being driven out of business by the unproven, false, and fraudulent claims that second hand smoke is a health risk and the absurd spawn of that lie that is the smoking ban.
A grass roots movement, not started by any organization or special interest group and not accepting any financial aid from anyone or group, has decided that public protest of, and conscientious objection to, this invalid, unconstitutional law which is based on false justification will take place in Bars, Pubs and taverns etal, by allowing patrons over the age of 21 to smoke a legal product in their private businesses. All ticketed people will demand a jury trial and those ticketed will file a class action suite against the proper agencies, governmental entities and people, in which we will prove our contention that the claims of tobacco control advocates that second hand smoke in working conditions is a health hazard are based on false and fraudulent statements and invalid studies that have been vacated by U.S. District Courts and debunked by over 40 scientific studies. We will demand a public funded independent testing of air quality in Bars, pubs and taverns in Colorado to prove that there is justification for the Colorado Clean Air Act. And we will call for hearings to determine if any legislator who voted for this act had pre-knowledge that it was based on false and fraudulent evidence before voting.
It is time all responsible be held accountable for foisting one of the greatest shams in American history on the people of the United States of America. Have no doubt we have the evidence and the will to stop the tyranny of personal preferences and governmental acquiescence over private property and freedom of choice rights.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:05 PM | Comments (157) | TrackBack

God is part of our American heritage

I don’t know if Regional Transportation District Director Dave Ruchman made up a story about someone who was made “uncomfortable” by a reference to God in the RTD oath or not (“RTD director asks that ‘God’ be cut from oath of office,” Feb. 14). It doesn’t matter if someone was “uncomfortable” with a reference to God. The fact is, God is part of our heritage as Americans.
It was believers in “God” who fought the American Revolution and shed blood for this country to be born and they called upon God countless times during that war. The history of that conflict does not contain a list of “Muslim Heroes of the American Revolution,” “Buddhist Heroes of the American Revolution,” “Hindu Heroes of the American Revolution,” “Atheist Heroes of the American Revolution” or any other religion’s heroes.
In my personal Marine Corps Bible (yes, I served) there is a copy of George Washington’s prayer for the United States — a Christian prayer. The men that fought and died to give birth to this country were overwhelmingly Christian and that’s not only socially acceptable, it’s a fact.
The United States under God does not need to be reinvented by every pantywaist, spineless apologist who bows to the pressure of someone being “uncomfortable.” How “uncomfortable” do you think the soldiers at Valley Forge were in the freezing winter without shoes, food or shelter?

Lance Gillis, Westminster

Posted by denver-admin at 11:53 AM | Comments (38) | TrackBack

Serious drawbacks to health insurance idea

John Conlin missed some key points in his Feb. 12 Speakout advocating an end to employer-based health insurance (“Get employers out of health-care picture”).
First, he said that employers would pay employees the same amount that the employers are currently spending for health insurance. While he is correct that this would cost employers the same, it would be taxable income to the employees. Additionally, the employee portion of the premiums would also become taxable income instead of being a pre-tax deduction as it is now.
Depending on their tax bracket, the employees would lose 25 percent to 40 percent of this money.
Second, health insurance premiums are much more expensive when purchased on an individual basis than on a group basis because there is no shared risk. So it will cost employees more money to purchase the same level of coverage.
Employer-based health insurance might not be the best solution for paying for health care, but the solution Conlin proposes would be much more expensive for most people.

Dennis Bronstein, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 11:53 AM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Black community tired of Phillips’ antics

Regarding your article of Feb. 12 about Acen Phillips — Phillips pretends to be concerned with helping the underdog and the only person he really helps is Acen.
In its story of his shady history (“A man with friends”), the Rocky omitted that he harassed and threatened to sue a Perkins Restaurant over alleged discrimination because he and his party were not served quickly enough.
I remember back in the ’80s when he ran Mount Gilead church — he had a Rolls-Royce parked in the lot, but there was no money for grass seed and the muddy lawn was a disgrace.
As the Rocky mentioned in the article, there were about 20 parishioners in attendance at a recent Sunday service at his church, the New Birth Temple of Praise Community Baptist Church.
This is not what’s called a following. As the saying goes, “You can fool some of the people all of the time.”
We in the black community are tired of self-proclaimed leaders given affirmation by the media.

Vivian Taylor, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 11:52 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Doing a heck of a job

We’ve trusted his leadership and promises for six years and are reaping the benefits today: an Iraq on its way to stability, outsourcing of labor giving us more leisure time, insourcing guest workers for jobs Americans won’t do, a border policy that showcases the North American Union, and, at long last, la oportunidad de ser verdaderamente un pais bilingue y multicultural (the opportunity for a truly bilingual and multicultural country). That mandate we gave him is almost accomplished! Let’s not give up! Georgie, you’re doing a heck of a job!

Rich McLean, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 11:51 AM | Comments (15) | TrackBack

Of pols and potholes

So the city of Denver might have to raid the general fund reserve for street repairs, shortly after City Council voted to hold an unnecessary special election last month to “fix” the Election Commission, at a cost of nearly $700,000.
That sum could have repaired 87,500 potholes (at the $8 reported average cost), but would not have covered the posteriors of council and the mayor for their re-election in May. I guess the voters will decide which expense was more important.

Aimee Rathburn, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 11:51 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Arrant nonsense in diversity training

For many years I was proud of 12 years served on the school board of Cherry Creek . Now that racists — or at least those who sound like racists — have been put in charge of a diversity program I wonder how the district can expect to be the example of tolerance it was (“Diversity drivel,” On Point, Feb. 7).
To state that white people have “a master and control nature” is to imply that nonwhite people have “a servile and complacent nature.” To say that whites in communicating “don’t show emotion and avoid conflict and intimacy” while implying that nonwhites do show these characteristics is not only demeaning but demonstrably false.
This arrant nonsense has no place being sanctioned among teachers unless the likes of the KKK are going to be sanctioned. Racism is racism whether pronounced by the Grand Wizard or a “diversity trainer.”

Robert Lipton, Lakewood

Posted by denver-admin at 11:50 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Congrove trustworthy

In the Feb. 14 Rocky Mountain News, there was a long story on the supposed excesses of Jefferson County Commissioner Jim Congrove (“Jeffco commissioner takes colleague’s actions to task”).
It featured an extensive rant by Jeffco Commissioner Kathy Hartman on how all complaints should go strictly through channels. Yet the month started with the ex-Jeffco treasurer story, in which the complaint was taken first to Congrove who immediately took it to the district attorney. Where then was the wrath of Hartman or the Rocky?
People go to Jim Congrove because they know that they can trust him. I do.

Russell W. Haas, Golden

Posted by denver-admin at 11:49 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

In good company

I see where Al Gore may be up for a Nobel Peace Prize. He would be joining such erstwhile stalwarts as Yasser Arafat, Kofi Annan and Jimmy Carter. Wow! Way to go, Al!

Ed Dean, Windsor

Posted by denver-admin at 11:48 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Legislative per diems

With apartment or Condo rents in the Denver metro area listed as averaging $850.00 per month (kick it to $1,000 furnished); and our out of town legislators receiving $1,000 a month more than local political electorates, why should they be given another $6,000 a year tax free? To pretend that such bright persons are residing in $100 a night hotels is an insult to those who elected you.

Given that a family of four could eat well on the other thousand a month all State legislators receive ($49 to $99 per diem a day while legislature is in session), and that the $30,000 a year they receive for their six (6) months of legislative service is probably average full year wages for their rural constituents (and should support their house at home without working the other six months of the year) a further grab for public funding is just laziness to fund a six month party without working.

Government wage, benefit and retirement packages need to more rationally reflect those of the constituents they proport to serve. $42,000 for six months of meetings, much of it tax free, is almost triple the median wage of the State. If you wish to remain on the public dole, and you’d rather be out performing public works for less money; such as shoveling snow, picking up trash, policing the population, putting out fires, teaching our young or filling pot holes; let us know.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:49 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Congress

Tim Vronay of Clifton writes:

Save the U.S.A., impeach all members of Congress. Do you need a reason or two; how about murder, treason, prostitution, etc.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:49 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Smoking

Art Vertun of Lafayette writes:

In July 2006 the Colorado Clean Indoor Air Act (CCIAA) went into effect. As we now celebrate the six-month anniversary of the CCIAA, we can reflect on the positive impacts that the smoke-free law has had on Boulder County and Colorado residents.
The smoke-free law has played a significant role in improving public health in Boulder County. As the U.S. Surgeon General highlighted in his June 2006 report, there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. The only way to fully protect nonsmokers from the dangerous effects of secondhand smoke is to eliminate smoking in indoor spaces. The CCIAA has reduced our community’s risk by limiting people’s exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke at work and in other public places. In fact, the CCIAA also protects the public by prohibiting smoking within 15 feet of the main entryway of all public buildings.
Today, residents in communities that previously did not have a clean indoor air ordinance – like Lafayette, Lyons, Nederland, and Erie – can now also enjoy the benefits of smoke-free indoor public places. I now feel comfortable taking my wife and children out to public restaurants that we may not have been to before without fear of inadvertently exposing them to second hand smoke.
Furthermore, while the law was not designed to help smokers quit, calls to the Colorado Quitline increased after the CCIAA was passed. This free telephone coaching service supports smokers through the quitting process and offers up to eight free weeks of the nicotine patch. The Colorado Quitline can be reached by calling 1-800-QUIT-NOW.
If anyone in the community has questions about the smoke-free law or the Colorado Quitline, they should call Boulder County Public Health’s Tobacco Education and Prevention Partnership (TEPP) at 303-413-7540 or visit TEPP’s website at www.BoulderCountyTobacco.org.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:48 AM | Comments (78) | TrackBack

Newspapers

Hank Riehl of Lone Tree writes:

Jason Salzman has his taxpayer-based newspaper bailout plan completely backwards.
He describes newspapers as a “civic asset” and then sites “sliding circulation” and “declining ad revenues” and blames their plunging stock prices on “Wall Street greed.” His solution, in the form of five proposals, is taxpayer support and public funding in order to help create “economically viable ways for local journalism to prosper.”
The reason why newspapers are experiencing sliding circulation and declining revenues is because the taxpaying public is migrating away from the “old media” and toward “new media” information formats such as web sites, radio and TV. They are exercising their freedom of choice in a competitive marketplace. Its also totally ironic that Salzman proposes taxing those very same folks who are abandoning newspapers, and selling their stocks, in order to “help create economically viable ways for local journalism to prosper.” That’s neither economic nor is it viable.
Salzman doesn’t get it; competitive markets work. Salzman’s issue is with competition, not with economics or viability. His “civic asset” looks more like a “civic liability” that fewer and fewer among us find of any value in light of many competitive alternatives. If we are going to protect newspapers with a taxpayer bailout, then what about all those poor folks who long-ago made buggy whips and delivered coal, kerosene and ice to our homes?
Shouldn’t taxpayers be asked to bail them out too?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:47 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Police shooting

Leroy M. Martinez of Denver writes:

In todays RMN . Good work to the Greely Police in shooting a man that wanted to commit suicide.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:46 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Pelosi’s plane

George Martin of Arvada writes:

Pelosi’s perquisites request (for “security” purposes?) exactly expose the real reason for standing for public office. It’s not the money, it’s ego massage.
We may understand a vague necessity for Mrs. Pelosi’s quick transport to “home” and back for an official with a possible emergency, but not routine trips with staff (of whatever nature). Several reasons to deny such exploitation of the public trust that would never survive a Libertarian audit come to mind.
Civil jet travel is speed barrier limited, routinely cruising around 450 knots no matter what size. So, almost any available machine can cross the country in about the same time, even with a fuel stop.
Who needs body guards in an airplane? Why are politicians provided body guards in the first place? Are they better than the rest of us, more important, more likely to random assault? Is ferrying civil authorities a good use of military hardware? Your expense.
What if it were you? Would you get all you can for yourself feeding at the public trough?
Diverting military aircraft from their primary purpose—war—is another misuse of civil funding and government power. Why doesn’t Pelosi stay in D.C.—where she wanted to be—and do her job?
Isn’t it time for the public to pay more attention to what their employees are about?
Awareness of government begins in your neighborhood, before criminal intent reaches a national level.
Think about it.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:45 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

New Orleans

Linda Lunbeck of Longmont writes:

It’s Mardi Gras, time to consider New Orleans. A recent visit there revealed a deeply complex situation. Some say, “Why rebuild"? As one of the world’s largest port areas, Southern Louisiana is vitally important economically, and a significant portion of the US’ oil and natural gas supply comes through New Orleans. And of course, it’s a unique national treasure culturally.
When one family loses their home and possessions - or when one business is destroyed - it is tragic. In the case of greater New Orleans, the devastation goes on for mile after mile, affecting all population groups. At the same time, the “touristy” parts of town are doing fine, offering something for everyone, whether culture and history enthusiasts, families, food lovers, shopaholics or devoted partyers.
How to help? 1)Go there: you will be warmly welcomed by people who deeply appreciate your presence and support, and who are determined to revive the area. Take time to see and understand the damage - and the progress. Talk with local folks, and spend freely, since tourists are essential to NOLA’s economy and morale. Enjoy the balmy weather, beignets and bayous.
2) Take people with you: if you’re looking for a worthy project for your group (professional, educational, faith, social, fraternal, civic, family, etc.), this one can’t be beat, and no passport needed.
3) Contribute what you can. Various organizations are doing important work there, Habitat for Humanity among them. Find one you click with and support their efforts; encourage others to do so as well. Make a Mardi Gras donation, then consider giving again in late August (anniversary of the disaster).
4) Spread the word, and stay informed. Read the small, compelling book 1 Dead in Attic by Times-Picayune columnist Chris Rose, if you can find a copy.
Every little bit really does help. Please join me.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:44 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Death penalty

George Lilly of Denver writes:

David Lane is opposed to the death penalty, because it is “barbaric". How about murder and rape; are they barbaric? How do the victim’s and/or the victim’s families feel about the murderers and rapists getting to live at taxpayer’s expense ($40K per year for who knows how long?). What if the criminals spared the barbaric death penalty go on to escape from prison and/or murder and rape again while in prison?
One of the specious arguments against the death penalty is the expense of a conviction. Who can we thank but less than ethical attorneys (David Lane is an attorney who has his bias - ethical or not?) who corrupt the system of justice with untold delays of motions etc. Another specious argument is that it won’t deter future murders and rapes. That is absolutely untrue. Once dead, the perpetrator can not repeat his crime.
Additionally, sticking someone in a 9 X 12 cell for life is just as barbaric to that individual and to the society that must finance that barbarism. Let’s face the truth, and that is that David Lane is not a Biblically based Christian, and therefore God’s law is irrelevant to him. Ah, but the Roman Catholic church is opposed to the death penalty also you say. True, but the Roman Catholic church has little use for the Bible, and that’s why there was a Protestant Reformation. That’s why we have the law system that we do today - torn and frayed as it is by the ideologues of humanism and socialism.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:44 AM | Comments (16) | TrackBack

President Bush

Pete Klammer of Wheat Ridge writes:

George Bush is like an addict or adolescent (or both) who can’t learn a lesson. “Ooh, look at this big club I can swing! Hey, America! The world is filled with dangerous wasps and hornets, and you need me to protect you! (Whack! Whack!) See?”
Our president must have misheard Teddy Roosevelt’s adage, “Speak softly and carry a big stick,” as, “Mumble ungrammatically and bash other countries!”
It just feels like he’s wrecked the car again and is asking for the keys to another.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:43 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Environment

Chris Kennedy of Lakewood writes:

It has been an exciting period for domestic policy, as the new Congress has made some very positive steps in what I hope to be merely the beginning of a very prosperous two years. Many issues will be reaching a boiling point in the near future, and nowhere is this more apparent than the environment.
I’d like to express my thanks to the congressional representatives who supported the CLEAN Energy Act of 2007 to repeal unnecessary oil subsides, tax breaks, and royalty relief after years of record oil-industry profits and continued dependence on foreign oil. So, thank you, U.S. Reps. Ed Perlmutter, Mark Udall, John Salazar and Diana DeGette.
I’d like to especially thank Perlmutter for co-sponsoring the legislation and speaking in support on the House floor. He has so far made good on at least one of his campaign promises and may very well be one of the foremost upcoming leaders of the progressive environmental agenda. I anxiously await his next move, and I hope the Senate is able to pass the oil subsidies legistlation as well.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:42 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Newspapers

Donald E.L. Johnson of Greenwood Village writes:

Metro papers not critical Jason Salzman ("Value of local newspapers must be protected,” Feb. 17, 2007) wants to make the huge mistake of trying use tax incentives to protect failing metropolitan newspapers against major changes in readers’ and advertisers’ buying patterns and new technology.
Salzman’s falsely assumes that metropolitan papers are critical parts of society. As a newspaper junkie and journalist, I’ve long agreed.
Sadly, I no longer do.
Metropolitan newspapers are failing because their primary readers have moved to the suburbs, which are poorly covered by the papers. The papers are losing readers because young people don’t seem to care about metro Denver, and they get their news from the Internet, broadcasters, local community papers and specialty publications.
The growth of metropolises like the Front Range is making big city newspapers obsolete. It is impossible for a metro paper to cover local news as well as small community papers do. And metropolitan papers do an equally poor job of covering national and world news. The national media put their content on the Internet, mostly for free. So who needs a metro paper?
As a result, metro papers are inefficient for most advertisers, many of whom are abandoning newspapers, making the papers unattractive to smart investors.
With tax subsidies, the papers would have to accept even more government regulations of everything, including content. Who trusts politicians to run and regulate newspapers’content? No one.
If Denver winds up with one metro paper or none, it will do so because that is all the market wants and needs, and the media markets must rule.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:41 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Geese

Robert Johnson of Thornton writes:

These geese we have hanging everywhere all around the state and others; why can’t we get rid of them?
I have HUNTED them, I’ve FED them, I really enjoy watching them fly, I’ve enjoyed WATCHING them poke around but they are filthy, very messy and carry disease. If you ever have walked where they have been hanging out you might slip on the mess they leave behind, ugh; or the children playing on that stuff how repulsive! (Thus the disease) I would suggest that we get rid of a lot of them by using those nets that they shoot over them so they can’t escape.
Back in the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s there was a shortage but no more.
It would do a lot to feeding the hungry with volunteers as well as others cooking them and the rest of the meal along with them.
Although the Animal rights group would probably moan about that but what else can we do?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:40 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Bush energy plan

Greg Horak of Aurora writes:

Bush’s insincere rhetoric in his recent State of the Union speech expressed little and will accomplish even less.
He claims he wants to reduce American gasoline usage by 20 percent in 10 years, yet fought automobile mileage standards, capped tax deductions for hybrid cars at $50,000, Cheney stated that “conservation has no place in an energy policy", and alternative energy programs have been grossly underfunded, and Vice President Cheney stated that “conservation has no place in an energy policy.” This while greedy oil companies gouged American consumers out of $100 billion profit while receiving a $14 billion tax break, and not paying the U.S. government nearly $10 billion in royalties owed for drilling rights in the Gulf of Mexico.
Of course, a major reason Bush launched the elective war on Iraq and wishes to escalate the conflict is in order to provide a steady supply of profitable Iraqi oil to his energy cronies, thus planning a U.S. presence in Iraq in perpetuity and endangering the safety and security of America for oil companies profits.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:39 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

David Hakala of Denver writes:

To: Colorado State Representatives Marshall, Madden, Romanoff, and Weissman; Colorado State Senator Ward; all of their colleagues in the Colorado Legislature; and to Governor Ritter
As a Colorado voter, I don’t recall any of you inquiring what my intent was when I enacted Amendment 41. I will explain it now, and my intent for you should you interfere with my will and that of other Colorado voters.
I do not trust you foxes to guard the chicken coop; nor do I trust you foxes with the care and feeding of the watchdog that I set: the independent ethics commission.
That is why the ethics commission’s composition and method of appointment are carefully crafted to make it difficult for you foxes to stack it with your den mates.
That is why the ethics commission’s powers are defined in permissive rather than restrictive terms. I fully intended that any member, not a supermajority that foxes might own, be empowered to issue sub poenas. I fully intended the commission to apply any and all penalties available at law, not just those which foxes choose to accept.
That is why the ethics commission is empowered to make its own rules “for the purpose of administering and enforcing the provisions of this article and any other standards of conduct and reporting requirements as provided by law.” I intended for the commission to decide what is frivolous and what isn’t; what is “legal consideration” and what isn’t; and to let this watchdog decide how best to guard the chicken coop. I do not trust foxes to make such decisions.
HB 1304 validates my distrust of you. It attempts to leash, muzzle, de-fang and hobble the watchdog that I set, for no one’s benefit except that of you foxes.
And now, be perfectly clear about this voter’s intent for all of you, should you interfere with my will: If you value your political careers, you will “kill bill” HB 1304, and never again try to tell the dog how to guard the chicken coop.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:38 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Atmospheric scientists

Greg Frost of Boulder writes:

Because of the budget impasse in Congress and projected funding cuts for U.S. atmospheric research, 20 percent of the scientific and engineering staff employed through a cooperative agreement between the University of Colorado and the Chemical Sciences Division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Earth System Research Laboratory in Boulder will likely lose their jobs on Sept. 30.
Researchers at the NOAA ESRL/CSD and its predecessor laboratories have made substantial contributions to the understanding of stratospheric ozone depletion, air quality and climate change. They proudly serve our nation and the world by seeking fundamental knowledge about the Earth’s atmosphere and advising environmental policy-makers.
Those losing their jobs at NOAA might not find work elsewhere in atmospheric research, because many U.S. scientific institutions face declining budgets. NOAA will lose capabilities that cannot easily be replaced even if future funding were to increase. Among the remaining ESRL/CSD employees, morale is low and uncertainty about their future is high.
Please ask your members of Congress to restore funding to NOAA this year and to boost resources for atmospheric research in the future.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:37 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Mike Littwin

Robert E. Forman of Lakewood writes:

I glad someone at the Rocky Mountain News has a sense of humor. Whoever came up with the headline to Mike Littwin’s 2/17/07 column, “Intolerant of intolerance,” did a masterful job at making fun of Littwin’s hypocritical nonsense.
Apparently what set Littwin off this time was Tim Hardaway’s “I hate gay people” statement “that makes him the leader in the intolerance clubhouse” because he “tossed the H-word around.”
Littwin, have you looked in the mirror lately? Because Tim Hardaway has competition, and his competition is you.
I’ll assume that by “the H-word” Littwin means “homosexual.” But the “H-word” could mean something that Littwin and all the other “politically correct” and “intolerant of intolerance” hypocrites despise: “Honesty” and the right of people like Tim Hardaway to express their opinions “Honestly.”
In response Littwin writes a one-sided opinion piece, blasts away at Hardaway’s “intolerance,” and alludes to “whatever rehab Tim Hardaway has checked himself into.” (Is that ‘rehab’ comment honest and truthful or something Littwin simply made up? “Made up” being a kinder way of saying something that may be more honest.) And unlike two other characters in Littwin’s column, Littwin may not share their excuse. Michael Richards verbally lashed out at a couple of people who were verbally taunting him. Mel Gibson was drunk. Did Littwin write his column under the real duress of having people looking over his shoulder and taunting him as he wrote? Did Littwin write his column under the influence of alcohol or drugs? Or did Littwin write his column in the quiet of his office space and while completely sober?
Given the latter, it is no wonder that whoever was given the responsibility to read Littwin’s column and then come up with a “grab” headline that would “grab” my attention came up with the hypocritical beauty of “Intolerance of intolerance.”
I hardly ever read Molly Ivins’ columns and I hardly ever read Littwin’s columns. After a while the usually always-negative shrill becomes too annoying. Unless there is that real good “grab” headline. And “Intolerant of intolerance” was a beauty.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:37 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Mike Littwin

Pat Desrosiers of Denver writes:

Dear Mr. Littwin: I agree with you on Mr. Hardaway. Send him off to re education camp (think “A Clockwork Orange") where he can be shown the error of his bad attitude. However, I disagree with Robert Ford. I, for one, am ready for a black president, but not one such as Obama.
Men such as Ken Blackwell of Ohio and J.C. Watts of Oklahoma have what it takes, as does Dr. Condolezza Rice. Guys like Obama don’t want us to win the war. They would pull us out of Iraq, causing the biggest bloodbath since we left Southeast Asia. He doesn’t realize that our military is the cork in the bottle over there. Remove the cork, and anyone who said boo to Americans would be summarily executed. Terrorists would have safe haven (as before we removed Saddam) and oil money to build weapons caches. They would have free rein to plan attacks on worldwide targets, including the U.S. mainland. They are ready to circle the date when we leave Iraq.
A year or so after we leave, a truck crosses our non existent border to the south, and parks on a downtown Denver street. The container nuke on board is detonated. A hundred thousand Coloradans die instantly. A million more die soon from radiation burns, illness and cancer. The fallout is carried east on the prevailing winds and brings death in its wake.
Many in midwestern cities don’t worry about this, since simultaneous explosions have taken place there as well. President HRC calls the mullahs to sue for peace and later that afternoon is fitted for a burqa.
This is the scenario we are buying with this idiocy the Treason Party is pushing. Jack Murtha has laid out the Dhimmicrat’s plan to control the Pentagon’s allocation and cut off funding for the troops (their dictionary has a different definition for “support"). They have been driven mad with Bush hatred and I am sick of it and their toadies in the media. America is the last best hope, and these folks want it to end. It turns my stomach, and I’m not the only one.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:35 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Electoral votes

Kay Cox of Northglenn writes:

Sen. Ken Gordon says Sen. Shawn Mitchell “is wrong on every single count” regarding Senate Bill 46, Gordon’s legislation regarding Electoral College votes (“Electoral College bill ignites partisan fight,” Jan. 23). I believe it is Gordon who is wrong.
What is Gordon talking about? Why is the Electoral College antiquated? Did anyone ever think that maybe just maybe the Founding Fathers knew what they were doing? Didn’t Colorado voters vote against a similar issue? Now the senators are claiming this change will represent the will of the people. What people? What is the history of the Electoral College that Sen. Bob Hagedorn corrected the Republicans about in the same story cited above? Maybe we all need to be corrected.
This bill is not a Democratic or a Republican issue and everyone should be concerned about what is being proposed. I would like to thank the Rocky for the stand it has taken and also I would like to thank Mitchell and anyone else who opposes this bill.
In the future, candidates for president will only need to worry about the states with large populations and Colorado will not be one of them. Way to go!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:34 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Evolution vs. creationism

David Cook of Loveland writes:

The recent Kansas Board of Education decision to only teach one side of “Origins", the question of why is the elephant in the room everyone seems to ignore. Why? 1. There are only 2 possibilities to Origins - Creation or Evolution. why teach only one?
2. Recent polls show that over 45% of scientist now admit that modern science advancements makes evolution more and more an impossibility, more than enough reason for those truly interested in truth to teach both sides. So why don’t they? 3. Schools in America have taught creation for 400 years. It is an established ciriculum. Why mis-state this obvious fact and say it isn’t? 4. Why would courts be called in on this debate? Why would they totally ignore #3?
5. With volumes of scientific proof supporting the creation model easily available for viewing and downloading on the modern internet, which would have to be known by press, scientist, teachers, lawyers, and judges, why is this debate even existent??
To me, the answer is in the actions of the above. It only makes sense if it is not about Origins at all, but about forcing an alien World View on a God based nation and it’s children. The only rational reason for evolution under the above facts that fits is that evolution justifies Secular Atheism. It cannot be about truth. Truth would look honestly at both sides. That is not what we are seeing. It, therefore, leaves only one other reasonable conclusion, to undermine a God based culture from within using the education system, with atheistic government and courts running interference. 3 percent are atheist by polls. This gives them total control of the other 97% who are not, with all the money, rights, and privileges that go with that control. It is the only reasoning that makes sense!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:33 AM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Richard Colwell of Parker writes:

“Grim” Stats Only Undermine Our Efforts in Iraq
On January 1, 2007, we reached another “grim milestone” in Iraq, according to the associated press - 3,000 U.S. soldiers killed. Unfortunately, that number has grown slightly since then, but grimmer still, is the major media’s daily reporting of the death toll as if it were reading a score card. I’m certainly not taking this number lightly. I have the greatest sympathy and admiration for those who have given their lives in Iraq and their families, but I would hardly call 3,000+ casualties in 4 years a grim milestone. Consider these: We suffered 405,399 casualties in WWII, 54,246 in the Korean War, and 56,244 soldiers were lost in Vietnam. In fact, there are more than a few battles in American history in which we took significant casualties, such as Gettysburg (7,058), D-Day (approximately 2,500), Iwo Jima (6,800), and recently, the 3,000+ civilians killed on 9/11/01. If Americans are spoon-fed a steady diet of the “grim” details seven days a week, then eventually public opinion will turn against any war, not to mention encourage our enemies to step up their attacks.
There’s no denying the fact that mistakes were made in dealing with Iraq since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. But perhaps we should consider what future casualties might be if we pull troops out now and allow radical Islamists, like Al-Qaeda, to take over with Iran only miles away to support them. Historically, that could be a poor tribute to the soldiers who have fought and died there so far.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:33 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Steve Clayton (retired USMC captain) of Colorado Springs writes:

To the day I die I will believe in the deepest depths of my heart that every U.S. Congressman and woman and every U.S. Senator who voted for their respective resolutions this past week/weekend to undermine the war effort, to stab our military in the back, and to embolden our enemies to hang on just as long as they can, including our own Senator Salazar, committed treason.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:32 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Carolyn Bninski of Boulder writes:

An Open letter to Senator Ken Salazar and Congressman Mark Udall: Over the next several weeks people will be coming and sitting in your offices to ask you to vote against the $93 billion Supplemental Budget which would pay for the brutal and illegal occupation of Iraq for another year. You have indicated that you intend to vote for the supplemental budget.
The purpose of these visits is to seek a redress of grievances (guaranteed in the First Amendment of the Constitution) for the violation of a clear mandate from the public in the November election to end the war against Iraq. As long as the funding continues, the war will continue. If you support the funding, you support the war.
People will also ask you to work hard for the passage of binding legislation that would prohibit President Bush from attacking Iran. Congress will be responsible for the disastrous consequences if they fail to prevent Bush from attacking Iran.
Everyone who will be coming to your offices is pledged to nonviolence. We hope you will respond to the people’s desire to seek a redress of grievances and to express their sorrow at the ongoing carnage in Iraq and the possible attack on Iran.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:31 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Naturopathic medicine

Rena Bloom, N.D., president of the Colorado Association of Naturopathic Physicians, writes:

Ah, Someone must not have been paying attention at the 5 hour hearing.
7 amendments were introduced and 6 passed.
HB 1192 does not license naturopaths. It licenses Naturopathic Doctors, who attended 4 years of Dept of Education accredited Naturopathic Medical Schools, and who successfully passed a national board exam.
The title naturopath, has been released to those who were awarded naturopathic doctorate degrees, and PhD’s, by unaccredited correspondence home study courses.
If the editors of the Rocky Mountain News cannot tell the difference between naturopath, and Naturopathic Doctor, why should we think the public will.
HB 1192 still has its issues. What was clear to this committee of 11 representatives, is a problem exists in Colorado that needs to be addressed. The biomedical model of health care is no longer the only model. Health care is a dynamic system that changes with time, cultural demands, and technological advances. The HHS committee, recognizes this, and without knowing the perfect answer to the legislative solution, is still willing to move this issue forward.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:30 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Marriage amendment

Bill Blomberg of Parker writes:

With all the uproar over the unintended consequences of the wording of Amendment 41, it occurred to me to look at the marriage amendment we also passed. It reads: Only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state.
Does that mean only one man and one woman “ever” or, as some people seem to think, “at a time?” The former case, “ever” would be the anti-divorce (or rather, no state-sanctioned remarriage after divorce), family-friendly interpretation that I’m sure we conservative Coloradans intended. The “at a time” mode would allow for freewheeling serial divorce and remarriage - not a lifestyle most Coloradans would condone. I am not a lawyer, but that wording strikes me as a little loosey-goosey.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:29 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Banking bill

Rich Bird of Fort Collins writes:

The Democratic-controlled state Senate passed a bill that will deny the lowest interest rates on loans and the highest interest rates on savings to the most needy.
The Democrats, in Senate Bill 40, on a 24-8 vote, passed a measure that would block Wal-Mart and Home Depot from owning and operating banks in their Colorado stores.
The bill was heavily lobbied by banking interests. These interests knew that in-store banking by these businesses would break the bankers’ current monopoly on high-interest loan rates and low-interest savings rates.
Again the Democrats show us just who they are and what they will do when we return them to power. What did the Democrats get from the bankers in order to pass this cruel legislation? How many families will go under because of the current bankers’ monopoly?
And who cares anyway?
It seems clear to me that the new robber barons are the Democrats!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:28 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Mike Archer of Golden writes:

It is time to admit the failure in Iraq and address the issues allowing the country to move forward.
The most important issue: bringing our troops home as quickly as possible in the safest and most secure manner. Beyond that we must 1) Assess the damage from this neocon nightmare and engage all parties including Iran and Syria in hopes of stabilizing the Middle East; 2) Focus on the core Middle East issue - the creation of a Palestinian state; 3) Begin a national debate asking why the American people and their congressional representatives were so totally fooled by a handful of dangerous and delusional people; 4) Investigate those responsible - including George Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz - filing criminal charges where appropriate.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:27 AM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Illegal immigration

Recently, the KKK has been found to be gaining strength in number and in power. Do not blame the people, do not blame the citizens from which they gain this power and strength. I would in fact, ask you to blame those truly responsible for this. Blame the government, both Republican and Democrat for this. The people of the United States has asked, pleaded and in fact, DEMANDED immigration reform. Instead of listening to the people as whole, they have listened to foreign governments and those violating federal laws.
When you have border guards stopping illegals transporting drugs INTO the U.S. and the guards landing in jail to appease a “paid off” U.S. District Attorney John Stuttun and the like, when you have cop killers being spared true justice to appease the Mexican government, it is no wonder that the KKK grow stronger. The president has failed us, the congress and senate has failed us all, and even the justice of the United States of America have failed us. I will not support or assist the KKK, but I can not blame them and in fact, I understand their anger towards our government.
Mr. President, Congress, Senate, and honored Justices, I ask you this. You want to take away power from the KKK? You want to stop them and make them weak? Then protect the country, strengthen the borders and ENFORCE THE LAWS OF THE COUNTRY. If you do not do so, then you alone are to blame for all violence, hatred and anger and the resulting acts committed. When there are lawsuits filed for discrimination, file them AGAINST the government, for they alone are responsible for the acts. Not the companies, not I.C.E. and not the people. The government of the people are to blame and are therefore liable for all that occurs in response.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:26 AM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

February 21, 2007
Labor bill veto

Dear Governor Ritter, So you had to break a big campaign promise pretty early on in your governorship. It’s too bad, but there it is. I imagine you will have to do many more unpleasant things in the coming years to keep those life’s-blood campaign contributions coming and those top-shelf post-gubernatorial job opportunities on the table.
But one thing: this long explanation/apology you had published in the Rocky Mountain News, please don’t do that again. It’s embarrasing and humiliating. It’s undignified. It looks weak. Nixon never apologized.
Tom DeLay isn’t going to apologize. You can bet George W. will never apologize. You should think big, like them, and hold your head high.
You’re a politician now. Nobody expects you to explain or apologize for anything. Just take the money and run.

Carl Will
Englewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:22 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Labor bill veto

Dear Governor Ritter, So you had to break a big campaign promise pretty early on in your governorship. It’s too bad, but there it is. I imagine you will have to do many more unpleasant things in the coming years to keep those life’s-blood campaign contributions coming and those top-shelf post-gubernatorial job opportunities on the table.
But one thing: this long explanation/apology you had published in the Rocky Mountain News, please don’t do that again. It’s embarrasing and humiliating. It’s undignified. It looks weak. Nixon never apologized.
Tom DeLay isn’t going to apologize. You can bet George W. will never apologize. You should think big, like them, and hold your head high.
You’re a politician now. Nobody expects you to explain or apologize for anything. Just take the money and run.

Carl Will
Englewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:22 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Abortion

I can think of few things more cruel than forcing a 14 year old girl to carry her rapist’s embryo to term.

Frederick C. Sage
Boulder

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:21 PM | Comments (33) | TrackBack

Labor bill veto

The people of Colorado voted for a change but we got the same old big business governor. By breaking his campaign promise everyone on both sides of the labor bill can see Governor Ritter has no integrity.
I am kind of a Lou Dobbs Democrat, Bill Ritter is kind of a George W Bush Democrat.

Dennis Parker
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:20 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Mike Rosen

The following is in reply to Mike Rosen’s column, “Electoral College dropout.”
If Mike Rosen dislikes democracy so much “(W)e are not a democracy, never have been and most definitely never should be” — why is he such an unswerving supporter of President Bush and his crusade to spread democracy by force of arms to the Middle East and beyond?

John Mosby
Limon

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:19 PM | Comments (14) | TrackBack

Renewable energy

I am so thrilled to see that Colorado is continuing to be a renewable energy leader in the nation with legislation that is genuinely tackling the problem of global warming. As an avid snowboarder, it blows my mind that snowpack in Colorado has dipped 9% below the levels seen last January in spite of the huge storms that swept through the region during the holidays. Fortunately, Pommer’s bill looks poised to pass with the support it’s garnered from so many parties.
Until I read this article, I was convinced that it was going to be a real challenge to increase the renewable energy standard in Colorado because it would cost consumers a ton of money. Discovering that Xcel Energy’s investment in wind energy saved their customers roughly $14 million in 2004 and 2005 was quite a shocker. Turns out that I couldn’t have been more mistaken!
While it’s fantastic to see all of these recent developments within Colorado, I think it’s about time that our Senators Allard and Salazar step up and become part of the national solution to global warming. If we’re going to avoid the worst consequences of global warming, passing a federal renewable energy standard is absolutely essential.

Adam Johnson
Boulder

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:18 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Labor bill veto

Gov. Ritter’s recent decision to veto House Bill 1072 single-handedly harmed the future of Colorado’s working men and women. Ritter campaigned in support the bill and assured Colorado’s labor leaders that he did support the change and would sign the bill. The bill would have eliminated the super-majority second-election requirement to establish Unions in Colorado.
This was not your run of the mill campaign promise. Labor organizations were not asking for a symbolic pledge to support clean air or clean drinking water. There was nothing ambiguous about what organized labor was asking.
This bill made it easier for workers to secure organized representation in the Colorado workplace. Ritter understood the ramifications and repeatedly voiced unequivocal support for the bill that he knew was coming, until the day it mattered. When big business applied pressure, Ritter folded like a house of cards, shame on you Mr. Ritter.

Michael J. Hora
[No hometown provided]
President, Colorado Mail Handlers Union Local 321

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:17 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Iraq war

The question is now being posed as to who really supports our troops in Iraq - those who advocate more war and more involvement or those wanting to terminate the U.S. involvement.
War supporters often lambast the Iraq war critics as undermining the mission of our military.
War supporters assert that it is the duty of our military to fullfill its mission, and disagreeing with the commander-in-chief is unpatriotic. The words of Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island, West Point graduate, refute this attitude: “You have to ask, who is really undermining this mission? Didn’t the Bush Administration undermine it it from the start by going to war without sufficient cause, without sufficient planning, without sufficient equipment for our troops? Even now, I would argue that the Bush Administration is undermining this surge by focusing merely on the military part of the mission, ignoring the need to reform the Iraqi government, to find a regional diplomatic solution and of course, ignoring the real facts on the ground”
The dismal moral of the Iraq war is, to never hand our military a mission that is impossible to complete. It is a terrible abuse of the men and women in uniform.

L. Highland
Morrison

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:16 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Illegal immigration

Frustrated (not Whiny) American !
As with many who speak out against those who don’t like our immigration problem, Mr Trujillo ( Whiny Americans - 2/13/07 ) also left out the very important 7 letter word. ILLEGAL.
It’s more like: Illegals are taking our jobs, which costs us.
Illegals are clogging our hospitals, which costs us.
Illegals are driving our streets without licenses and insurance, which costs us.
Illegals are filling our school, and using our other services that they shouldn’t be entitled to, but expect, which costs us.
Illegals shouldn’t be getting food stamps. That costs us too.
Every labor pool needs workers, and illegals don’t occupy just one. I guess Mr. Trujillo didn’t hear about all the AMERICANS who lined up to fill the spots opened up by the Swift raid in Greeley. How would he feel if the tables were turned and this was happening to him in his home? Mexico. Never thought about that either.
I’m and American. I got my education. I’m working on my 28th year at my job. I don’t drink and I don’t do drugs.
And I’ll whine about our “ILLEGAL” immigration problem as much as I want to !!!

Mark Hermanson
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:16 PM | Comments (35) | TrackBack

Climate change

Well, here we go again. The “scientists” are telling us that the world is going to end in 100 years or so, due to “greenhouse gases” from our usage of fossil fuels (“Humans, warming tied,” Jan. 20). What they do not tell us is that just one large volcanic eruption can do more damage to the atmosphere than we mere humans could do in 100 million years!
Please, do the American thing and think for yourselves. There are two sides to every story.
First, go to sites like http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/ to find out what is really going on. Second, just use common sense. For example, professional meterologists are giving us our weather on the evening news. They can predict what will happen within about 48 hours. However, when they give us a forecast that is one week out or longer, their predictability rate drops dramaticallyto about 40 percent. Now these “scientists” are telling us what is going to happen in 100 years? Yeah, right. If they cannot predict what the weather will give us in one week how can they predict what will happen in 100 years?
Think for yourselves before they destroy the economy with their unreliable data.

J. Harris
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:15 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Labor bill veto

In regards to Gov. Ritters veto of House Bill 07-1072 perhaps we Union people should take a vote and see if 75% of us want to keep him in office.

Walter Glass
Steamboat Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:14 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Snow removal

I have one question to ask the people that want their residential streets plowed to the pavement and all snow removed. How much of tax increase are you willing to pay for equipment and manpower that will only be used every few years?

William Geist
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:13 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Saint Valentine’s Day

Is February 14th, Saint Valentines Day or just Valentines Day? It seems like our Holidays are getting shorter and shorter like Presidents’ Day, Xmas and Columbus Day, someday it will become King Day? I think that we should spell it all out.

Reed Embrey
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:12 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Columbus Day

I find the continued celebration of Christopher Columbus completely disturbing. For 100 years now this state has celebrated this person who is known to have traded slaves, stolen land, and was responsible for the deaths of millions of Taino people. How bad does a person have to be to not be considered for a holiday?
I also am appalled that every year the events of 1492 are taught to our children as some sort of positive step for hunamity. I hope Gov. Bill Ritter is able to keep his “Colorado Promise” to make education a priority. If that is true, then we should stop lying to our children every October. No more celebrations for this thief and murderer.

Gayle Doughty
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:05 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Australia’s John Howard

Having gone to school with them when a lot younger Aussies seem to come in at least a couple distinctly different categories. One kind are athletic, vigorous, hip, open-minded, internationally oriented/adventurous and a sheer pleasure to be around. Others like Fox News head Rupert Murdock, my h.s. Spanish teacher, and now apparently Australian Prime Minister John Howard are just as contemptibly ignorant, simple, small-minded, redneck and provincial as any Mississippi Klansman (just a different accent.) These are not the kind of people we want to be listening to in domestic OR International American policy and procedure.
Someone please tell me where this clown (Howard) gets off criticizing ANY American policy or politician anyway?
I suggest Senator Obama take keen note of this kind of potential obstacle recognizing that he’s only the tip of an iceberg he’ll be dealing with in the future.

Grant D. Cyrus
Boulder

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:04 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Columbus Day

The state of Colorado officially recognizes two holidays honoring individuals: Martin Luther King Day and Columbus Day.
King was the respected leader of a great, nonviolent struggle for civil rights and equality, a Nobel Peace Prize winner recognized around the world for his courage and moral example. Coloradans can be proud that their state honors such an individual.
Christopher Columbus was a slave trader, a man driven by greed and arrogance who, in his quest for gold, was responsible for the torture and death of literally millions of indigenous people, condemned by his contemporaries and history for his atrocities. The people of Colorado should be embarrassed and outraged that the state honors such a man.
State Sen. Suzanne Williams is sponsoring legislation to repeal the Columbus Day holiday, and remove this stain from our state. She deserves the support of all Coloradans.

Mark Cohen
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:03 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Evolution & faith

As a believer in Jesus Christ, Savior of the world, I was shocked to read the article in Jean Torkelson’s column on Monday Feb. 12 about the celebration of “evolution Sunday” in some Colorado churches, on the occasion of Darwin’s birthday. The members of the apostate church who signed the Clergy Letter Project espouse the heresy that evolution and Christianity can comfortably coexist . The authority of scripture has been seriously undermined. Any philosophy that attempts to extricate Creation from true history destroys Christianity at its heart: “In the Beginning there was the Word (Christ), . . and the Word was God, and all things were made by Him.” (John 1:1)
The genealogies of Christ in the New Testament clearly show that Adam was created a few thousand years ago. In Linda Seebach’s article on Feb 10, it was noted that hundreds of scientists have gone public expressing doubt about Darwin’s theory, because it is not science, and is devoid of any empirical basis. True Christians accept the claims of Christ, and He taught a literal Genesis. In Mark 10:6, He tells us that Adam and Eve existed in the beginning, not after billions of years of cosmic accidents gradually producing mankind.

Bill Browning
[No hometown provided]
Rocky Mountain Creation Fellowship

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:02 PM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

A Differing View: Ritter would do well to help RTD drivers

The Feb. 8 Rocky editorial, “Taking aim at RTD,” represents a one-sided view of labor policy. Gov. Bill Ritter will probably sign a bill limiting the percentage of bus routes under private contract. This will cancel the Republican mandate that 50 percent of those routes be under contract. Ritter’s signing will show fairness to working people.
Many of us who voted for Ritter are not members of unions. We just favor laws that give a little more power to the working class. In my view, organized labor is the best anti-poverty program ever. Mandates empowering workers are as American as any pro-management mandates that former Gov. Bill Owens supported. I’ll pay the extra 25 cents to ride the bus so the driver might live a decent life.

David E. Wilson, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 10:27 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Ritter’s veto of labor bill no surprise

The banner headline, articles and editorials in the Feb. 10 Rocky Mountain News make it appear to be a big surprise that Gov. Bill Ritter would do the right thing concerning the veto of HB 1072.
Front-page references to “shock and awe” at his decision demonstrate that the media, both political parties, labor and business have yet to learn that in Bill Ritter they are dealing with one of the most principled, thoughtful, dedicated-to-the-common-good individuals they will ever know.
Those who have known Ritter for many years, and I am thankful to be one of them, know that he always attempts to do the right thing for the right reason. His reasoning concerning additional collaboration in this labor bill matter is just another example of what we can expect from a leader like him.
Don’t be shocked, don’t be surprised. Just be grateful.

Mark C. Pautler, Lakewood

Posted by denver-admin at 09:16 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Racism widespread

I read with interest Tina Griego’s recent Border Street piece about those here illegally who are dodging deportation from the United States (“Dreams percolate while they dodge deportation,” Feb. 15). I thought the column was quite informative until I read the part where Maria questions her husband about what “gringos” do after they come home and do not come back outside. His answer was “watch TV.” The racial dig toward those of Anglo descent is hard to miss. I did not find the printing of these comments appropriate nor were they appreciated.
I dare say Griego would never print such remarks against anyone of Latino descent. I guess she still operates on the politically correct premise that only gringos can be racists. As her column sadly reflects, there is plenty of racism to go around.

Janet Jenkins, Greeley

Posted by denver-admin at 09:15 AM | Comments (17) | TrackBack

Let’s drop asphalt

Has anybody else noticed that the potholes in wintertime are mostly on asphalt roads? When you take into account the total long-term costs (including automobile damage, repair of potholes, etc.) involved with this material, I think it would be a better to use concrete for the majority of our public highways. Even if it costs a little more, I would pay higher taxes to cover the difference to save me the aggravation of potholes.

Gerry Grodecki, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 09:14 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

February 20, 2007
Snow removal

When I saw the snowplow and the grader circle my block in December, I knew it was inevitable that the snow would be piled up in front of my driveway.
To my surprise and amazement, the operator of the plow returned to clear snow from the front of my driveway. The snow removal company was truly conscientious about minimizing the impact on residents while plowing the streets.
I learned that the city of Aurora had contracted Dacoa to help with snow removal.
As I drive around metro Denver, I realize Aurora’s residential streets have so much less snow and ruts than the other cities residential streets. I attribute the drivable streets in Aurora to early plowing and the foresight of the city in realizing that assistance was needed to combat the forces of nature.
Thank you to the city of Aurora for contracting Dacoa to help clear the streets.

Cindy Allen
Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:50 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Driving in snow

People who do not know how to drive in the snow at some point end up in a ditch, or, as Speakout author Denny Dressman put it, he was prepared to “brake quickly” (“Upside down in a ditch? Here’s how it happens,” Jan. 28). In other words, he was prepared to put his car in a spin and cause a large pileup behind him. Why didn’t Dressman leave extra distance between his car and the one ahead, anticipating that the pickup he was worried about might well pull in front of him? Then he might not even need to use his brakes.
I was recently driving south on C-470 approaching Morrison at about 1 a.m. Conditions were horrible, so I had slowed to 55 mph. Traffic was very light and moving about 30-40 mph. About a mile down the hill I saw a car spin out. Like dominoes, the next four cars all went in to spins, with three of them hitting the center wall. I downshifted (yes, manual transmissions are the way to go). Never using my brakes, I slowed to about 25 mph this way and continued on my way. None of those cars were driving very fast, they simply either were not paying attention or did not know how to drive in the snow.
Somehow, this “idiot” managed to avoid the same fate as those other patient, smart drivers.

John Hax
Indian Hills

Posted by denver-admin at 12:43 PM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Denver

Recent articles in the Rocky described the inadequate snow removal at Denver International Airport when compared to other cities such as Chicago. And then there were the weeks of articles in both Denver papers documenting the chronic problems with Denver’s inability to conduct elections. And then there is the growing problem with gangs and illegal immigrants flocking to Denver and Colorado.
Where Chicago is known as “The City that Works,” Denver is becoming to be known as “The City that Doesn’t Quite Work Yet or Ever.”

Martin J. Allen
Centennial

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:37 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Perfume

I was pleased to see the letter to the editor about “Secondhand fumes (Jan. 30), although I believe it will fall on deaf ears.
Most people thatwho choose to wear colognes and perfumes don’t realize that after they’ve had it on for about 30 seconds, they can’t smell it. But everyone else can!!! It’s frustrating for those of us with allergies or asthsma to, basically, be given no choice but to get prescriptions from our doctors for the problems that mayight occur.
And I also agree with the statement that they contain a number of harmful chemicals. If you’ve ever done any Internet research on exactly what goes into perfumes, you’d wonder why folks aren’t walking around “drunk” every day, as every kind of alcohol known to man is listed as an ingredient.
If you want to wear perfume, that’s your choice, but please be aware of the best way of putting it on so that it doesn’t overwhelm the people around you (spray it in the air and walk through it). And if it’s not sprayed on, just daub lightly on your wrists and rub your wrists on your neck. And gentlemen, subtle is much sexier!

Deb Welch
Northglenn

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:36 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Climate change

Al Gore will win the Nobel Prize for a lie. He does not “know” global warming is anthropogenic. He has taken the “consensus” or the “belief” of a portion of the scientific community, made a film and called it fact. Beliefs don’t become facts without evidence. How many of us still believe the earth is flat? Based on evidence, we know it’s not. Based on scientific evidence the earth has been warming and cooling for millions of years without man’s influence. Why is his “evidence", that global warming is man-caused, more reliable just because it’s “consensus"? Perhaps, I’ll make a film showing that global warming is not man-caused. Can you imagine the relief of fear and suffering? Wouldn’t I deserve the Nobel Prize, as well?

Will Volskis
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:35 PM | Comments (31) | TrackBack

DeBoer neighborhood

I write to support the proposed S. R. DeBoer Historic Preservation District as described in the original application encompassing all the structures, including but not solely limited to the Tudor home.
As you know, I have been a frequent guest at your home since 1994. I have met many people at your home who today I count among my close friends and extended family. I love the neighborhood where you live. I love the large, mature trees and the character of the older homes with distinctive architecture. Neighborhoods like this are what make Denver unique.
We all love this forested enclave in Denver. I would hate to see it change.
I love the beautiful old trees and thick foliage which add immeasurably to the beauty and charm of this established neighborhood.
Many times I have enjoyed an evening with you, your family and friends, at your home in the backyard surrounded by all the lovely trees and plants. I know I have commented so many times on how lovely it is. While it is great to plant new trees, and I truly applaud Mayor Hickenlooper’s initiative to do just that, it is at least equally important to preserve these lovely stands of mature trees and foliage which garnish our older neighborhoods.
These trees contribute tremendously to the character and charm of the neighborhood and should be preserved.
I know that DeBoer strongly believed that single family homes with private front yards and mature trees were what most attracted people to this particular part of Denver. That was the case in his time and is no less so today.
I respectfully urge the Denver Planning Board and Blueprint Denver to approve the original Application for Landmark Designation with the proposed District Boundaries as per that original application.

Richard Taylor
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:34 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Iran

Most of us are tired of hearing the mainstream media defending Iran in the war on terror. The U.S. has been engaged in a war of proxy with Iran for months. Yet, the Democrats will stop at nothing to discredit the President, even to the point of defending Iran in the war on terror. This point of contention is borne out on the front page of the Denver Post, “Bush: Iran providing bombs.” Whether the weapons in Iraq were ordered by the Iranian Government or not, it is known that such weapons were manufactured in Iran. In short, Iran is known to be complicitly involved in Iraq, and that in itself is sufficient reason for the President to take whatever action is necessary to defend our troops. Yet, the liberals will ignore the facts simply to attain their own ends.

Brian Stuckey
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:34 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Homeland security

The report that the Bank of America is issuing credit cards to would be terrorists is disturbing, to say the least. The fact that the bank is issuing credit cards to persons who do not have Social Security numbers is, in effect, a carte blanche for all illegal immigrants. It is also an open door to terrorists who are plotting to attack the U.S. We hope that the Attorney General and Department of Homeland Security will investigate this matter without delay. The Bank of America must be held fully responsible for this flagrant violation of our national security.

Brian Stuckey
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:33 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Religion & schools

Perhaps letter writer Ken Kloppenborg (Letters, February 12, 2007) would be surprised to learn that Colorado teachers are required already to teach religions in grades K-12 by the Colorado Department of Education.
“Because religion plays a significant role in history and society, study about religion is essential to understanding both the nation and the world. Omission of facts about religion can give students the false impression that the religious life of humankind is insignificant or unimportant.” (Colorado Model Content Standard for History #6) Sadly, in my High School curriculum writing experience, School District Superintendents run away from this standard and, by their example, lead most teachers with them. Those left to teach to this standard are often “on their own” without the umbrella “topcover” of district staff should an activist parent ever challenge why their child is learning about religion.
State Senator Schultheis’ bill would actually serve to protect teachers who are just trying to do their jobs whether they’re part of the “religious right” or the most liberal wing of the Colorado Education Association. Because activist judges are out there waiting to jump all over teachers and their school districts, this bill is desperately needed, regardless of your political or philosophical orientation.

Bill Spencer
Colorado Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:32 PM | Comments (25) | TrackBack

Seat-belt bill

Re: “Pretext for Police Stops” 2/5/07 Has the Rocky Mountain News fallen prey to simple thinking by confusing primary enforcement of seat belts with “essential civil liberties”? In Colorado, driving is not a right, but a privilege granted in exchange for observance of traffic laws designed to make our roads safer and to protect one another. These laws are many and varied – including stopping for lights or signs , observing speed limits, having vehicles with lights and other safety features, installing up-to-date license plates, having intact windshields, requiring current vehicle registration, and having insurance — to name only a few. The list goes on and on. Are the editorial staff and those legislators opposing Senate Bill 151 suggesting that having an up- to- date license plate is as life saving as wearing a safety belt? I surely would hope not— given the reduction in death, the elimination of thousands of injuries, and the enormous cost savings to the general public of Colorado.
The News correctly points out that as many as 70 lives a year – including children — will be saved by a primary enforcement law. Since this apparently isn’t enough to meet the “libertarian” threshold for concern, maybe some additional facts can help: in Colorado, the total cost of traffic accidents to employers is estimated to be $359 million annually in lost productivity, costs associated with replacing injured workers, medical costs, disability costs and sick leave pay. Medicaid impacts of head injury crashes alone exceed $7 million per year in Colorado. These unnecessary costs are borne by each and everyone of us — even if it is your choice to wear safety belts.
In keeping with the “libertarian” theme, I have a right to have my government find ways to reduce and eliminate these unnecessary costs. Similarly, when someone loses control of his or her vehicle because they are not properly belted, I have a right to be free of the carnage they inflict on fellow motorists and the unsafe conditions they create on public roads.
Regarding fears of “police harassment”, opponents including Representative Morgan Carroll, added language to the bill last year to raise the standard by which police enforce this law. Opponents’ language prohibits law enforcement agents from stopping someone for suspicion, and requires that they visually observe and be able to articulate that they saw that seat belts were NOT in use.
Making Colorado roads safer is the goal. Given our climate and terrain, Colorado roads are some of the most challenging in the nation. A law which substantially reduces road deaths and serious injuries, eliminate or reduces significant costs to our government and society, and protects those who are least able to protect themselves deserves everyone’s thoughtful support. I applaud the expressed concern for minimizing civil liberties and reducing police harassment should that occur. But, both arguments are stale and misguided in this context, and their proponents, including the News, would do well to focus on real threats to our freedoms.
Lastly, we give the law enforcement community the authority to police our roads and highways per the laws of the state. We can trust that in enforcing the rules of the road they use their judgment as to when and how to enforce the laws that the legislature passed and the Governor has signed into law. Just having a statue in law will notify the driving public just how such a law is considered important by the governing powers, and will signal to those who choose to break the law that there is a chance that they could be caught and ticketed. The threat alone of ticketing, and the associated fine, will in itself cause an increased use of safety belts without the law even having to be enforced. That will be accomplished because Coloradans are for the most part law abiding. No piece of legislation being considered during the present legislative session can come close to reducing highway deaths, minimizing serious injuries, suppressing the unneeded pain and suffering, and eliminating millions of dollars of unnecessary societal costs for emergency service, health care (both short and long term), and Medicaid. Let’s get over arguing about “rights” and get on with legislating quality of life for Colorado citizens which will be gained by passing Senate Bill 151.

Norm Sherbert
Evergreen

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:31 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Junk mail bill

Stuart Steers article on page 14 of today’s RMN, “Bill to create a no-junk-mail list faces surprising foe: post office,” contained an amazing statement by “Al DeSarro, a spokesman for the U.S. Postal Service, ... “ where he said that the bill “ ... might cost thousands of postal workers their jobs ...
Let me get that correct, the U.S. Postal Service wants mailboxs stuffed with de facto trash paper that is mostly discarded so as to provide jobs for “thousands of postal workers.” I have many job descriptions in this life, but one of them is not, “to provide jobs for ‘thousands of postal workers.’” Further, there is no provision in our Colorado Constitution to maximize federal governmental employment.
Pardon my ignorance, but for many years I have been of the evidently stupidly naive thought that the mission of the post office was to deliver mail, not to redistribute my income to a postal workers dole program. But Mr. DeSarro let the cat out of the bag; unfortunately the postal service admits being a unionized, bureaucratized, governmental monopoly operated for the benefit of the employees, not the customers. This is another example of the term “government worker” being an oxymoron. “Sure you can trust the government, ask an Indian” - a bumper sticker.

Louis J. Schroeder
Greenwood Village

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:30 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Air safety

OK, folks! Enough! You’re completely missing the primary issue here (“Fussy tot removed from flight,” Briefing, Jan. 24). This was a safety issueand covered by federal law. End of subject!
The airline was in no way obligated, but very generous, to offer this couple and their child free tickets for later travel. This was completely unnecessary. These people were unable to comply with federal air regulations prior to takeoff and were removed from the aircraft under federal law. The flight attendants’ action protected the child, her parents and the passengers on the aircraft. Safety first!
It is unfortunate that this happened. Perhaps all parents can learn something from this situation and take the time to prepare themselves andtheir children well before the planned travel. Games of “pretend flights” ahead of time can be fun for the entire family as well as a way to let the kids know what to expect when the travel day arrives.

Jacque Rutledge
Northglenn

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:28 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

President Bush

There is absolutely no question about George W. Bush being clueless about the war in Iraq, the war in Afghanistan, the security of our ports of entry, the security of our borders, world diplomacy, the economy, in fact George W. Bush is just plain clueless.
George W. Bush is being handled like a puppet by Dick Cheney who without a doubt is a delusional psychopath with an agenda of lies, deception, hate and dictatorship.
America is in great danger with this duo of doom and misery. The only hope for the future of America is to impeach George W. Bush (the mentally challenged) and Dick Cheney (the psychopath).

Leon Rodriguez
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:28 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Junk mail bill

ANOTHER BILL THAT OUR STATE LEGISLATURE IS WASTING TIME ON This “No Mail List” or “No Junk Mail” bill announced by CO State Rep. Lora Gagliardi is a complete waste of time for both our state government and the tax payers. The only action the bill can do is force small businesses to quit advertising altogether.
For example if a small business owner wanted to run a ad in the Sunday news paper it would cost approx. $165.00 and would only cover the households that get a newspaper and happen to browse through every section and happen to notice the ad. Whereas, if the same small business owner did a saturation mailing with the same $165.00 he could reach 1300 households and each and every household would view that ad letter to determine its value to the customer. If this bill passes we are taking choices away from small businesses to try and grow there business.
Secondly, there is a website that can take a person off all national mailing registers; www.dmaconsumers.org/cgi/offmailinglist Sponsored by the national Direct Marketing Association (DMA). A person can sign up on this list and be taken off every national mailing list, allowing local businesses to still advertise and reach local customers. Why should our tax paying dollars go to enforcing this kind of wasted bill when there is a mechanism to get off 60% of all mailing lists already?
Thirdly, the mailing industry constitutes a 9.2 billion dollar a year industry involving 150,000 jobs including printers and envelope firms, retailers, large and small businesses, direct mailers, marketers etc. besides the 11,000 Postal Workers for the state of Colorado. I ask you, where we are going to fill 161,000 jobs and create 9.2 billion dollars in revenue if this bill passes? Lastly, what kind of mail will this prevent a consumer to lose? What is enforceable on this bill? I believe you will start to see more “resident” or “occupant” mail, because this law allows you to take your name off this list. If it is changed to allow you to take an address of the list, then the next address owner will be without, unless the state of Colorado adds a “Yes, Mail List” bill.
Bottom line is this bill will only hurt business, waste our legislator’s time, waste tax payer’s money to enforce the bill and put people out of jobs and on the street. Is this piece of legislation worth not having to look at 2 or 3 extra pieces of mail a day?

Keith J. Reid
Greeley

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:27 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Medicare, Medicaid cuts

Bush has decided to cut Medicare and Medicaid to help pay for his war. Seniors have paid into this all their working lives. After they retire, they have to take Medicare as their Primary Insurance, their Company Insurance is Secondary.
Medicare cuts the bill down then pays 80%; the Company Insurance pays 80% of the 20% . After you are drawing Social Security, they deduct payments for Medicare part B.
There are a lot of things Medicare won’t approve. If Medicare won’;t approve then your Secondary won’t pay anything.
Your Social Security is taxed as earned income. It should be free of taxes and treated as Insurance.
The Feds are taking money out of Social Security and Fica for their pet projects.
Seniors paid into it with the idea that it was Insurance. Some say S.S. is going broke because more people are retiring than are paying into it.
Some refer to it as Welfare, some as the Government giving it to you...Neither is true, we are entitled to it.
Bush is bankrupting the Government with his war. I guess, so that “They” can install the New World Order or One World Government that Bush Senior talked about when he was Pres.
Young working people should wake up and make their voices heard., otherwise they will be paying into it for nothing.

Franki Rader
Thornton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:26 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Now let’s get this straight. After 9/11 Bush decides to send troops to Iraq, claiming they had WMD’s and that removing Saddam Hussein was our priority, when no Sunni was involved in the attack on our soil. But we at the same time invaded Afghanistan where Al Qaida, and Osama are really hiding. But we concentrate more on Iraq? We removed Saddam, who is a Sunni, and help get the Shiites in power, who are now making ties with Iran, who from what I have read are about to join the Nuclear club ? So we are fighting who? Sunnis or Shiites? So to turn our attention from this mess he blames open borders for what happened, so now we are cracking down on illegal immigration. I have not heard of a hispanic, or Latino involved in 9/11. Yet the GOP and their voters say that’s how things should be? Now Bush is doing the same thing with Iran, saying they are helping insurgents. Who are the insurgents Sunni’s or Shiites? Al Qaida’s presence in Iraq is minimal, just enough to keep all of our might out of Afganistan, where we should be, hunting Osama. I support our troops, I support getting them out of the mistake the GOP created, to make money, and to finish the job, Bush senior failed to do in 1991. It is scary, how our president assumes more power than the constituion alows. It’s time to impeach before we really lose respect of other nations for not standing up to a wanna be dictator, who is as lost as a first grader, on the first full day of school.

Bryant Morales
Greeley

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:26 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Columbus Day

Let’s not have a double standard. Columbus did engage in acts, as did his peers, that by today’s standards are atrocious. No sane modern person has ever honored him for that. We honor him because, above lesser men, then or now, he exemplified courage, indomitable spirit, leadership, bravery, fortitude, and accomplishment to prove the impossible possible.
We honor with no less sincerity Native American leaders like Crazy Horse, Cochise, Quanah Parker, Red Cloud, Tecumseh and many others for similar exceptional qualities as they fought to defend their way of life.
These heroes, however, also committed atrocious acts. That’s the double standard. When Native Americans give up honoring Crazy Horse, because he as a warrior as other Lakota warriors, raided, kidnapped, enslaved, and murdered people of other tribes, as well as pioneers caught on the trail to Colorado, Oregon and California... when honoring Crazy Horse is given up, then Columbus can be given up. Not likely huh? Let’s not tolerate a double standard, then. Instead we should recognize what was outstanding in all men and women who rose significantly above the mundane to achieve greatness while conducting themselves within the mores of their culture and historical era. That would leave out Hitler and Stalin and Pol Pot and other psychotic aberrations, but include great men like Columbus and Crazy Horse.

Rich McLean
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:25 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Molly Ivins died on Jan 31. This is the last paragraph of her last column, published 3 weeks before her death.
“We are the people who run this country. We are the deciders. And every single day, every single one of us needs to step outside and take some action to help stop this war. Raise hell. Think of something to make the ridiculous look ridiculous. Make our troops know we’re for them and trying to get them out of there. Hit the streets to protest Bush’s proposed surge. If you can, go to the peace march in Washington on Jan. 27. We need people in the streets, banging pots and pans and demanding, “Stop it, now!”
So this is my small effort. Mr. Bush; stop sending U.S. troops to Baghdad to try to referee Iraq’s civil war. Your “surge” will only lead to more American deaths. Although the current situation in Iraq is largely a result of your arrogance and incompetence, the civil war now going on is an Iraqi problem and Iraqis must solve it. More American troops will not lead to a solution, only to more American targets. You already have the deaths of nearly 3100 American soldiers and untold thousands of Iraqi civilians on your head.
So stop it now!!!

David Organ
Loveland

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:24 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

President Bush

SO WHY DOES THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION ONLY TELL US PARTIAL TRUTHS?
Recently Bush announced that the Iranians are supplying the insurgents with weapons. So What? Russia has been supplying AK47’s to them and to drug dealers across America for years. In addition to a few grenade launchers and mortars. Its OK for the US to provide Israel with planes, tanks, guns bombs, rockets to fight the Palestinians?
Iran is a much larger threat than Iraq ever was, and it has grown to be a much larger threat since we attacked Iraq and since Bush called them “the axis of evil.” Our soldiers should know the truth about what they are fighting for. After all they are making the ultimate sacrifice, shouldn’t they be entitled to the truth? They are told that because they are fighting in Iraq they are fighting to protect America. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, had no WMD’s or nuclear, nor a connection to Al Qeada. Iraq was never a threat to America. The threats have escalated since we have been there.
Our troops deserve the best, they do believe they are serving America, they do believe their sacrifice is important. They are not responsible for the lies propagated to them by this White House. They are sincere in their effort and should be applauded for it. And they deserve better care than their getting when they get home. But we must lie to them in order to get the recovered ones to go back. Way to go White House.
The real responsibility and condemnation goes to the Bush administration.
Their intimidation of the CIA and FBI to provide false information to the Congress and America then attacking Iraq should be thoroughly investigated and punished. There are over 3,120 American soldiers killed, over 35,000 wounded/maimed and over 150,000 Iraqis killed mainly because of the irresponsible, incompetent man in the White House. Not to mention that each person in the US now has a tax liability of over $28,000.00. Impeachment should be the first option.

Leonard Muniz
Broomfield

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:23 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Conservative? Liberal?

Until about a generation ago, I considered myself to be a conservative, but now most people think of me as a liberal. I HAVE NOT CHANGED!
Back then we conservatives did not advocate torture, for any reason. We publically disavowed discrimination. We were adamant about maintaining a strong military to prevent wars, not start them. We were ardent capitalists who favored a solid middle class and a robust small business community as the backbones of a strong nation.
We did not believe we had to cater to big business. We wanted smaller government and less of it involved in our lives. We stood strong by the Constitution - some of us even fought and died for it. We held individual freedoms above all else. We fought for fair and honest elections.
We believed in truth. We wanted abortions to be reduced, not outlawed. We did not try to protect corrupt politicians. We believed that a duty of the government was to help those suffering from natural disasters. We strived to preserve the greatest health care system in the world so that Americans would never lack for medical care. We believed that we should ensure proper care for the elderly, even if the government had to step in to assist. Ditto for our veterans. We believed that decorated war heroes should be honored and chicken hawks should not. We did not condone incompetence in our leadership. We felt that no person should be imprisoned without proper representation and the right to due process. We were respected and admired by the rest of the world. We were the bastion of freedom. We believed that a free, unencumbered press was essential to ensure our freedom and the American way of life. (There was no such thing as a liberal or a conservative press. The press was just the press.) We believed in the separation of church and state. We didn’t infuse “family values” into politics and try to force our values on everyone else. We believed in science. We believed in honoring all religions equally.
We believed that we the people were the “deciders". We never started a single war. We didn’t believe anyone was above the law. We believed that the homeless were Americans, too. We did not believe in destroying the lives of good people just because they disagreed with us. We did not believe that war profiteering was OK. We did not hate liberals, and the liberals did not hate us. We believed that it was more important to base decisions on facts than on ideologies. And we despised fascists. Today’s conservatives hold none of these ideals.
I have not changed, but if you want to call me a liberal, that’s fine with me because true conservatives no longer exist. Conservatives of a generation ago believed in strengthening our nation, not destroying it.

Mike McDaniel
Boulder

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:20 PM | Comments (21) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

In response to recent comments, that uninformed people are deciding the future of our state, I felt I needed to respond. I consider myself an informed voter. I read Amendment 41, as I do all issues we vote on, and didn’t think even remotely, that the wording in this amendment, applied to everyone, at all levels of government. Even after closely reading it today, it’s hard to fathom that thinking individuals, could consider all of the possible implications. Even with teams of lawyers, there is a lot of wondering what the true interpretation is, of Amendment 41. How are average people, without the benefit of legal counsel, supposed to make “informed” decisions? The real problem, isn’t with voters, informed or otherwise, but with the ease that our State’s Constitution can be changed. Anyone with the will and the money, can pass laws, that leave the rest of us scratching our heads, and the legislature and judicial branches to sort out the mess. The Constitution should be the foundation upon which all of our laws should be based, and as such, should not be changed on a whim. There should be little question about the intent, or meaning of the words that are written. With the recent debacles of Amendments 27 and 41, maybe we need one more amendment, making it very difficult to change what our forefathers, evidently put more thought into, than the current generation.

Robert Marvin
Fort Lupton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:19 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Anna Nicole Smith

Now that Anna Nicole Smith has three people claiming to be the father. I want to play the game and win lots of money. So I say I’m the father.

Leroy M. Martinez
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:19 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Democratic convention

We spent tax dollars to build the Convention Center and what do we do when the Democratic Convention comes to town? We use the Pepsi Center.

Leroy M. Martinez
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:18 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Executed inmate

Concerning the inmate who took thirty-five min. to die. They say that he felt pain and was not properly sedated. I say that there is a God. What about the pain his victim felt when he killed a bar manager 27 years ago. He got to live 27 years more.

Leroy M. Martinez
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:18 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

Concerning Amendment 41, why does the ex-governor of Colorado (Owens) get to give his buddies bonuses for staying with him in office as a reward when high school kids are unable to receive a scholarship.

Leroy M. Martinez
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:17 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

RTD oath

So the higher ups at RTD want the word God out of their oath. I supposed they want to separate Religion and State like everyone else. I am sure they do not mind spending our tax dollars even when the dollar says on the back “In God We Trust”

Leroy M. Martinez
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:16 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Climate change

If Speaker Pelosi and the Democrats really believe in Global Warming, why is she insisting on having a Bigger Jet than the President?
Why have her own jet at all?
She should be reducing her ‘ carbon footprint ‘ not enlarging it if she believed what she says about Global Warming.
The Truth is, for most people who talk about ‘ Global Warming ‘it is simply an issue of convenience they use to pursue their own agendas.
I don’t believe there is any Anthropogenic Global Warming, and more to the point, most of the people who promote that notion don’t actually believe it either.
If they did, they wouldn’t be wasting everyones time talking about ‘ solutions ‘ like solar energy and wind power — which are fine when the sun is shining and the wind is blowing, but simply cannot meet the power on demand needs of a modern, technologically based society.
If they truly believed in Global Warming, they would promote Hydroelectric and Nuclear Power and make a sincere, honest effort to reduce their own CO2 Emissions.
Their Actions belie their statements about their beliefs.
So, when their carbon reduction mandates and carbon taxes come through and everyone is paying higher prices for EVERYTHING ( the price of electricity affects the price of everything ) I hope someone will remember these people and their actions, not their words.

John Lepant
Brighton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:15 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Mike Rosen & English

Mike Rosen (“Educrats initiate a ‘newbie’”, Feb 16) thinks that English immersion is better than “the crutch of bilingual education.” Mr. Rosen might be interested in knowing that scientific studies consistently show that bilingual education is more effective than immersion in helping children acquire the English they need for school.
In fact, in the last two years, four major reviews* have been published confirming this, including one from a U.S. government report.*
Bilingual education works because it uses the child’s first language in ways that accelerate English language development.

Stephen Krashen
Los Angeles
Professor emeritus, University of Southern California

* 1. Slavin, R. and Cheung, A. 2005. A synthesis of research of reading instruction for English language learners, Review of Educational Research 75(2): 247-284.
2. Rolstad, K., Mahoney, K., & Glass, G. 2005. The big picture: A meta-analysis of program effectiveness research on English language learners. Educational Policy 19(4): 572-594.
3. Genesse, F., Lindolm-Leary, K., Saunders, W., and Christian, D. 2005. English Language Learners in U.S.
Schools: An Overview of Research. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(4), 363–385.
4. Francis, D., Lesaux, N., & August, D. 2006.
Language of instruction, In D. August & T. Shanahan, (Eds.) Developing literacy in second-language learners, pp. 365-413. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:14 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Elk overpopulation

My purpose in writing this letter is to express my opinion on what the state of Colorado should do with the ever so increasing elk population in the rocky mountain national park. I’m a junior at Eaglecrest highschool in centennial colorado, and we read the article about the elk written by Jeremy P. Meyer. It has come to my senses that the elk population has boomed since 1969 where there was only 500, now there is more than 3,000. This is not a safe number to be in one place, they’ll start to destroy habitat which kills off many species in that area that- need -that specific habitat to live for instance, the beaver. To try and solve this situation i believe that we should have the reintroduction of wolves. wolves used to roam this state all in and out until they were over hunted. with that said wolves should be no problem then since they used to live here anyways. In the article that i read, it said that more than 70% of Colorado’s residents would support the idea of the wolves coming back. The thought of going in and having hunters hunt them for sport, would not only break a federal law written in 1929, but it would also most likely bring the population back to where it was in 1969, then we would have to fight to bring the population back up. Having the wolves come back would be a positive thing by not only would they cut down the elk population naturally it would also make there own population grow therefore always having a comfortable amount of wolves back in colorado.
Overall i believe that this is the most natural way to go about reducing the elk population. “Having elk and wolves in the same state...that’ll live up to Colorado’s historic wilderness once again.”
Devin Klundt
No hometown provided

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:14 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

Amendment 41, officially called “Standards of Conduct in Government,” would have been better titled “Banning Politicians and Government Employees From Having Friends. Under 41, if I have a friend who serves in government I can’t take him to a Broncos game if I happen to get a couple of tickets (unless I ask him to pay me for the ticket). I couldn’t give a $51 bottle of wine to a fireman who saved my cat…or my house. For a job in government, only the friendless should apply.
The fact that Amendment 41 passed by a fairly wide margin shows two things: First, voters do not think through the ramifications of the words they read unless millions of dollars are spent educating them that the language is misleading. (Or maybe they just don’t read the words.) And second, Common Cause has mastered the art of creating misleading language.
Let’s not forget that Common Cause, the force behind Amendment 41, was also the brain trust behind Amendment 27, conceivably the worst campaign finance law in the nation because it effectively limits political contributions from individuals and corporations but not from unions.
Common Cause is a decidedly left-wing organization, but my guess is that the unintended consequences of Amendment 41 were a function of muddle-headed liberal thinking, whereas the terrible consequences for free speech and electoral fairness created by Amendment 27 were almost certainly not unintended. What we really need is a ballot measure to repeal any constitutional amendment supported by Common Cause.

Ross Kaminsky
Nederland

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:13 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

RTD oath

I thought it strange that the RTD director would ask that the reference to God be cut from the oath of office. (RMN 2/14/07) Can we be candid here Mr. Ruckman? If you don’t believe in God, which your request indicates, what harm is done to you or any other atheist when you say “so help me God"? I can’t imagine that it would be anymore meaningless to you than to make no reference to God al all. What’s the difference? your trying to remove references to God from our lives or we Christians trying to put a reference to God in yours? Let’s be real. Making a request to remove a few words from the oath that you take to become our employee seems ludicrous. But it’s not. It’s a serious effort on the part of the liberal establishment to control yet another facet of our lives.
History tells us that the founding fathers referenced the creator many time in the creation of this great country. Are we now willing to reject those beliefs, and what’s the cost if we do? There are enough evils at work to destroy us and what we stand for.. We should all be willing to accept the status quo rather than remove the one ally we still have to remain a force on this planet.

Robert Johnson
Highlands Ranch

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:12 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

DeBoer neighborhood

I grew up in the neighborhood that harbors the DeBoer woods and forested areas. We played among the trees and bushes that are on the property owned by Anna Novas. It was our refuge, our imagination could run wild under the towering trees. The man who had the foresight to create such great places in our neighborhood and our city should be honored. Please seriously consider granting the DeBoer Historic Designation.

Becky Jansen
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:11 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Jeffco commissioner

We the undersigned believe Jefferson County Commissioner Jim Congrove to be unfairly singled out for public humiliation (Jeffco official accused of snooping,2/8/07). For the first time in a long time, Jefferson County finally has a leader that takes bold, needed and honorable action to uncover and correct things wrong or neglected. The attacks bring to mind the saying, Let no good deed go unpunished. Jeffco citizens know or strongly suspect there have been years of negligence, malfeasance and abuse of power. To clean it up takes time, personal integrity, courage and grit. Jim came into what others had perceived as a kind of viper’s den of ill-gotten, ill-used political power, and resolved to take appropriate action, and has been doing so.
Kick over a beehive and you’ll get a raging swarm of bees. The question is, why are they raging? Those bees have been doing nefarious deeds for a long time and it will take time and effort to correct the situation. Thanks to Congrove the job is being done.
Fortunately we have at the helm a man with the integrity, talent and will to get the job done. Go forth and investigate thou good and faithful servant, Commissioner Congrove. Thanks for doing the job you are doing.

Dr. Jay McGrew
Ted Raines
Homer Wall
Fred Holden
Paul Martin
All Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:11 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

I thought it was not possible for the legislature to change laws approved by the majority of the voters, and now a part of the constitution!
However, as they seem to be able to do so, I can think of two amendments that deserve nullification much more than Amendment 41. These are Amendment 23, and Referendum C (The de-Bruce law). Is it now open season on these?

Bill Harrison
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:10 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

“Amendment tinkering, once again"(2/14/07) Senate President Joan Fitzgerald is quoted as saying, “...and quite frankly, the citizens need to do a better job of educating themselves on what these ballot measures really do.”
I am offended that Fitzgerald thinks I’m an uninformed voter. I certainly knew what I was doing when I checked the Yes box next to Amendment 41 on Election Day. I was supporting meaningful ethics reform for Colorado. I was taking a stand against the freebies, trips, and gifts given to legislators to influence their decisions. I was also aware that the “unintended consequences” were primarily the handiwork of lobbyists. Amendment 41 was never about stopping scholarships, and now the courts agree.
I apologize that, much like rest of us “uneducated” voters, you now must pay for your own lunch, but it is time for the Legislature to step up and do their job by passing implementing legislation that upholds what the voters wanted in the first place: ethics reform. It is truly sad that Fitzgerald won’t support the will of the voters, and truly offensive for her to assume her constituents are uneducated because they support ethics.
Perhaps voters need to further educate themselves before voting Ms.
Fitzgerald into office. Shame on you, Joan and any other legislators who think they are above their constituents.

Michael Guarnieri
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:09 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Potholes

I read the February 14th articles about snow removal and pothole repair costs with both concern and amusement. The Tabor amendment was passed to make the municipalities more accountable for spending, budgeting, and management. Better management in the City of Denver is the critical issue, not the record snow falls. I know this because I worked in Public Works Finance for 19 years. Part of my job was to recommend cost savings and additional revenue from more efficient performance by both the City and contractors. By raising these issues I was “encouraged” to take early retirement.
Public Works has the responsibility to maintain streets and the general quality of life in residential and business districts of the City. Anyone who has driven west on 8th Avenue past Denver General in recent months has to question the quality of the street resurfacing. The same situation is found on south Broadway near Gates Rubber. The way these streets were repaired and resurfaced has more to do with wear and tear than harsh weather. Parking meters on Broadway between 3rd and Alameda have been unreachable (and mostly uncollectible) for more than six weeks.
The City can’t fire taxpayers for demanding they do better jobs, with no additional taxes, higher fines, or dipping into emergency reserves!

Rick Greene
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:09 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Senate Bill 34

Seems to this Alabama truck driver that if I ever come to Colorado again, I would expect the State to honor my concealed carry permit.
Also, if I maintain my place of residence in Alabama, my carry permit would remain good in the State of Colorado no matter how long I stay.
In my opinion, Rep. Al White is trying to chase away good honest people whose only desire is to be able to defend themselves against the wretched refuse of our society. If you remove that right of self defense, then what is left? Do we let these felons have their way with anyone they prey upon? Mr White - I seriously believe your RAM chips are installed backwards.

Fred Fuhrer
Tallahassee, Ala.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:08 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Smoking bill

Senator Joan Fitzgerald After sitting in on SB 103 hearing yesterday, I am ashamed and appalled at how government is taking away American’s rights bit by bit. The Senators who sat on the committee showed nothing but disrespect to the many businessmen and women who testified. Their demeanor spoke for itself, the following Senators acted bored as if their minds where already made up before the hearing ever started. Senator Groff left the room in the middle of testimony at least five times, Senator Romer left at least 3 times. Senator Windels spent 80% of the hearing playing on her computer and giggling.
These Senators where put into office to represent the people, now I understand why the people distrust government so. While the results where disappointing, so were the actions of our elected officials, to say the least.
There were over 30 people who testified on the economic loss of their businesses. A survey I conducted showed these businesses had a decrease of income in the 30 to 50 % range. 44 bars have closed their doors, over 600 people have lost their jobs, 128 women whom are single mothers. Both businessmen &women testified to their loss of income, businesses being empty for extended periods of time, their licenses and insurance rates put into jeopardy of being lost or revoked as a direct result of the many problems cause by the Smoking Ban. Bars robbed, women being harassed or worse because of going outside to smoke, customers smoking Pot outside, drug dealers approaching smokers to sell drugs. This amounts to a drug dealers friendly law.
The smoking ban law is not only poorly written, It is also confusing and without common sense or logic. For government to enact a law that puts businesses out of business is fascist government at its finest. The 14th Amendment of the Constitution, Section 1 The Equal Protection clause ie: No state shall make or enforce any laws which shall abridge the privileges of its citizens or deprive any person of life, liberty, or property rights: nor to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Senator Romer stated, they did not want to go backwards(remember prohibition). Well Government is going backwards with the smoking ban.
While we the people will be going forward for LIBERTY AND FREEDOM OF CHOICE.

Bonnie Ferguson
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:07 PM | Comments (28) | TrackBack

Make My Day bill

It was great to read the News’ endorsement of Rep. Cory Gardner’s HB1011, which would provide the same legal protections of self-defense against violent intruders in the workplace as in the home. I commend you and the majority of the Colorado House for recognizing this bill for the simple, common-sense legislation that it is.

Anthony J. Fabian
Aurora
President, Colorado State Shooting Association

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:07 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Iran

Bush and his team of masterminds that brought us the Iraq debacle are at it again with Iran. But this time they are promising a bigger and better war. They’re like bad Hollywood producers that keep bringing summer sequels to the same terrible movies.
Bush’s charges against Iran are sounding painfully familiar. Supposedly Iran is providing advanced weaponry to Shiite militias to attack Americans, yet very little concrete evidence has been produced, certainly none tied to the central government of Iran. It’s disturbing that Bush ignores the fact that Iran is closely tied to America ‘s Shiite allies in Iraq and has a vested interest to encourage stability. Remember how Bush/Cheney tied the secular Saddam Hussein to the religious radical Al Qaeda group, ignoring the advice of our intelligence community that the two were actually bitter enemies?
With concerns over Iran’s nuclear ambitions, its support for Hezbollah and Hamas and its alliance with Syria, it may be in our interest to encourage change in Iran. But it shouldn’t come from bullets and bombs, but by open diplomacy and the free flow of ideas and culture. However Bush’s pigheaded strategy actually works against our interests and would rally the Iranian people against America, strengthen the nation’s hard-liners and turn the people of the Middle Eastern region towards Iran – and further against the U.S.
Bush’s lack of imagination for solving problems is astounding. He has a hammer and everything he looks at is a nail. It’s too bad that Bush didn’t go into Hollywood instead of Politics. At least we’d only be out the price of bad movie tickets.

Henry Curtis
Fort Collins

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:06 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Climate change

I truly hope that Bill Gernannt’s was being sarcastic in his February 6 piece Global warming can only be a good thing. If not, it speaks volumes to his woeful ignorance of the issues surrounding global warming. After reading his piece, H.L. Mencken’s timeless quote, “for every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong” came to mind.
Gernannt asked what was the downside to his list of “benefits” due to global warming. The following is a small sampling of downsides due to global warming. These are: rising sea levels (with consequent land loss), insect infestations, widespread species die offs, increased energy consumption during summer months to keep cool, and mass human migrations as people search for arable land. The list goes on and on.
Even recalcitrant CEO’s are finally recognizing that global warming is not only an environmental disaster, but an economic disaster as well. To wit, just a few weeks ago, chief executives from some of America’s largest corporations have joined with environmental organizations urging U.S. lawmakers to pass sweeping legislation that would ultimately cut greenhouse gas emissions significantly.
By the way, Greenland was not called Greenland because it was “green.” It was called Greenland to help promote colonization of a landmass that, at that time, was considered a barren glacier.

Michael Command
Loveland

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:05 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Smoking

I am appalled at the demeanor of the committee’s actions at the hearing of SB 103. Particularly Senator Windell who sat most of the time ignoring the testimony and giggling at funny emails on her computer, Senator Groff who acted bored most of the time and left the hall in the middle of testimony at least five times and ate ice cream as if sitting at home watching television and Senator Romer being patronizingly glib about it all. These three all showed little if any respect for the many bar, pub and tavern owners and others offering overwhelming evidence of business loss, the many layoffs of employees, the trickle down effects on support businesses, the problems resulting from people having to go outside to smoke, the disabled peoples support of our bill, and, most importantly showing that they already had their minds made up despite a hall crowded with taxpaying constituents who came in support of SB 103.
If this is the way our Senators act toward the public, I understand why the peoples distrust of government is growing. There were 1600 bars, pubs, taverns and clubs in the state of Colorado, now there are less than 1500 as a direct result of the ban. Did you know the oldest VFW club in the state had to close it’s doors along with many others. Did you know that if this law is allowed to exist, the closure rate will grow exponentially to the point that within two years over half of these now existing businesses will be gone and thousands of people will have lost their jobs. Not to mention the millions and millions of dollars lost in state tax revenue, license fees, property tax, income tax, unemployment insurance for single moms, who make up over 65% of bartenders and wait staff, ancillary companies and, the loss of retirement investment, livelihood, children’s and grandchildren’s educational savings and pride in being independently self sufficient tax payers.
I would like to believe you don’t think the junk science propaganda of zealots, which we can prove has been debunked, is worth all these disastrous effects. The simple truth is we are going under. Can you find in your heart some semblance of the despair we feel and grant us a way in which we can remain the honest, hardworking, tax paying, proud and patriotic family men and women that we are.

Allen Campbell
Colorado Springs
Senior vice president, Coalition for Equal Rights

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:05 PM | Comments (34) | TrackBack

War protesters

Ernest M. Duckworth Jr’s letter condemning “violent” protesters during last weeks anti-war demonstration drags out the old conservative wives tale about war veterans being spit upon. There is a book called “Spitting Image” by Jerry Lembcke that thoroughly examined these allegations and found not a single shred of evidence to back them up. Instead the author discovered that most of the stories date to the 80’s when conservatives were busy revising history in an attempt to pin the Vietnam war debacle on “liberals". No doubt Mr. Duckworth spends too much time listening to right-wing radio, where assertions need not be backed up with facts.
Conservatives call those who don’t blindly follow our deranged President into his wars of choice the “blame America first crowd". Considering the 70% of Americans believe the Iraq war was “not worth it", isn’t it ironic? Before tossing around allegations as incendiary as veterans being spit upon, perhaps some evidence would be in order. How about a witness? How about video tape? How about checking your facts before tossing out bogus allegations to justify your warmongering predilections?

Charles Buchanan
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:04 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Smoking

It was really sad to see small business people desperately trying to hold on to their neighborhood bars while the most Orwellen legislature in the history of Colorado looked on with disdain (Rocky Mountain News 2/13/07( “Vote Burns Bar Owners")! If second hand smoke is so hazardous in the work place then why not handle the problem through the Occupational Safety And Health Administration (OSHA) and Workers’ Compensation (WC) as in all other aspects of business and industry? Second hand smoke is, after all, just as much of a byproduct of a neighborhood bar as other airborne substances in industry, for example, metal fumes are a byproduct of a metal foundry. If the amount of airborne material in any other work place situation exceeds established standards, ventilation will be required to bring it into compliance. Is the Legislature trying to tell us that second hand smoke cannot be ventilated? Oh, by the way, just what is the air quality standard for second hand smoke, anyway? And while we look that up, how about also finding out just how many workers’ compensation claims for this alleged hazard have been successfully adjudicated? For that matter were OSHA and WC even factored into this boondoggle? I hope that the resistance to this ban doesn’t go away. Given the current legislative climate it portends a further path down the road to the ultimate “Big Brother” society that we were warned about in the middle of the last century!

John M. Berger
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:03 PM | Comments (39) | TrackBack

Junk mail bill

Reading your piece “Is Junk Mail So Bad” on the internet, in the UK, I’d like if I may to add a word of warning.
In the UK it has been possible for many years for consumers to register on our equivalent of the Do Not Mail list. In one way it can be said to have worked quite well, in that people who don’t want to receive adverts through the post, register and by and large stop getting them.
But the problem is that the campaign against this type of advertising has not stopped there. For the last three years the UK has had a vigorous campaign against all direct mail advertising - a campaign mostly sponsored by national newspapers that are fearful of the way advertising through the post is eating into their revenues.
What such campaigns ignore is that (at least in Europe, and I believe in the USA too) postal advertising subsidises the loss-making postal services used by consumers every day of the week. To give an example, in the UK it costs around 40 cents to post a letter from one part of the country to another. If there were no junk mail to subsidise this service the postal service would have to charge about $2.50 per letter.
I mention this because it does seem that introducing “do not mail” policies is only the start of such campaigning. I applaud your approach, and do hope you do not end up with the whole postal industry under threat.

Tony Attwood
Corby, Northants, United Kingdom

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:02 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Absurd water policies

Agriculture can withstand many challenges — weather (cold, freezes, hail, wind, drought), insects, diseases, low prices — but not the challenges of government: The change of water policies and new regulations requiring agriculture to replace water used up to 30 years ago and proof of a six-year future water reserve is an insurmountable requirement for farmers to begin pumping their wells again.
Agriculture and locally grown produce is in jeopardy.
Water policies and regulations affect all of the people.

John Martindale, Platteville

Posted by denver-admin at 09:28 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Is more government really the answer?

It appears that the sun will finally do what most metro area public works departments could not for the past seven weeks. Remove the snow and ice from the streets. Many words have been exchanged between frustrated citizens whose family sedans have been scraping bottom on rutted-ice streets and public servants charged with said removal.
A more intriguing question that comes to mind is why nearly half of the electorate of our fair state can look out their living room windows and see the absolute incompetence of local government juxtaposed against the cleared private parking lots at shopping malls, neighborhoods hiring contractors to get the job done, etc., and yet still believe that what this country needs more than anything is government-delivered health care.
Please imagine, the year is 2015 and after six years of the smartest woman on earth being in the White House the U.S. finally has “free” health care provided by that model of efficiency, the federal government. Further, consider the effects of a widespread bird flu outbreak or a virus released by terrorists or some other unforeseen epidemic that sweeps the country.
At this point, true-believing liberals are thinking, “Well, that would be different.” How, exactly?
Sounds like blind faith to me.

Mark S. Griffith, Parker

Posted by denver-admin at 09:28 AM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Give kids, families a break on 41

As a parent of twin high school seniors applying for scholarships, I was dismayed by Vincent Carroll’s On Point column item on Amendment 41 (“No wiggle room,” Feb. 15).
I agree with Carroll that there are many unintended problems caused by Amendment 41 that the legislature is powerless to fix. One area where the legislature can and should act, however, is with regard to children of state employees who are applying for college scholarships.
The Rocky has noted that performance-based scholarships are not banned under the full language of Amendment 41, and we now have two District Court judges who agree. With that background, it is time for the legislature to step forward and minimize the very real harm being done to hard-working students and their families.
I would ask Rocky readers to contact their legislators and urge them to support Rep. Rosemary Marshall and Sen. Steve Ward’s proposed enabling legislation to give Amendment 41 a reasonable interpretation.

Bill Hurd, Grand Junction

Posted by denver-admin at 09:27 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Database needed to confirm permits

Letter writer David Gill couldn’t be more wrong. Gill, vice president of the Colorado State Shooting Association, publicly accused State Rep. Al White of “asking for a totally unrestricted, unprotected statewide database of law-abiding citizens for no practical purpose other than to compile a list of gun-owners” (“Law-abiding gun owners targeted,” Feb. 13).
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Gill’s letter was based upon half-truths, exaggerations and distortions. The database is not a registry for gun owners. The County Sheriffs of Colorado are staunch supporters of the Second Amendment and would never support such a bill.
All HB 1174 will do is continue the database previously approved under Colorado law; nothing new, nothing extra. Colorado sheriffs presume that concealed handgun permit holders are law-abiding citizens, but that is not always the case. Unfortunately, some of them participate in criminal episodes and are arrested for violent crimes or demonstrate serious mental health problems.
The independent database (not with criminals as alleged) provides sheriffs an opportunity to identify permitholders who have been arrested for violent crime and no longer qualify for a permit under Colorado law. There is no other purpose.
White has the foresight to understand legitimate public safety issues and the courage to do something about it. He and others sponsored the original concealed handgun permit legislation which even Gill called an “unqualified success.” Continuing success is dependent upon law enforcement’s ability to confirm the authenticity of permits and to ensure that they are verifiable in the field.

Sheriff Joe Pelle,
President

Sheriff Doug Darr
Secretary/treasurer

Sheriff Grayson Robinson
Legislative chairman

County Sheriffs of Colorado

Posted by denver-admin at 09:27 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Immigrant-coddling Dems are too much

After reading the Feb. 1 Rocky article “English-proficiency bill ripped by Dems,” I must say I am about to become a registered independent. These Dems are driving me crazy coddling Hispanic immigrants. Now they don’t want them to be required to be proficient in English in order to graduate. Why do my grandchildren have to be proficient in order to get the very same diploma?
So now they don’t have to speak our language, and to make matters worse, we have to pay for bilingual this and bilingual that, translate state and local documents, have translators for tax-paid services and yet all other immigrants (Russian, Korean, etc.) somehow have to manage.
I am tired of this, especially after spending 28 minutes on the phone one recent morning with an Arapahoe County office that constantly spewed Spanish in my ears while I held. Go, U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo, go!

Tudy Taylor, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 09:26 AM | Comments (21) | TrackBack

Repeal Columbus Day

The study of the Columbus Day holiday suggested by Sen. Suzanne Williams is long overdue (“Columbus Day name may change,” Jan. 23). Many people of color feel disenfranchised because the state of Colorado pays its employees (with our tax dollars) for a day off that honors an individual whose actions resulted in great havoc and massive loss to their peoples.
A reasonable alternative would be to replace Columbus Day with Election Day, which used to be a holiday.
That is a day steeped in civic responsibility and, no matter what your political leanings, a unity of purpose. Columbus Day simply emphasizes, inflames and deepens the divisions among us. I would like the state to take the necessary steps to repeal Columbus Day as a holiday in Colorado.

Lori Windle, Lafayette

Posted by denver-admin at 09:26 AM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Lawbreakers favored

The dilemma: A group of law-abiding people want to participate in a parade to honor Christopher Columbus, considered to be a national hero, but are confronted by a group of lawbreaking, violent, vulgar thugs who have vowed to stop the parade by whatever means.
Now we have a state legislator who plans to resolve the problem. Shall we honor the rights of the law abiders or give in to the lawbreakers? According to Sen. Suzanne Williams, it should be decided whether to eliminate the holiday or change its name (“Columbus Day name may change,” Jan. 23). I don’t think I have to point out to her that either “solution” favors the lawbreakers.
Do we want people like this running our government?

Elizabeth Morgan, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 09:25 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

The shame of it all

Imagine a Democratic convention in a city of graffiti.

Leroy M. Martinez, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 09:24 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

February 19, 2007
Worker ID program

The “experimental” employment-verification system that Sen. Wayne Allard and Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff propose to “fix doesn’t work and likely will never work (“Senators: Worker ID program needs fixing,” Jan. 23). Worse, efforts to tweak this system and share information between agencies that is, between large government databases filled with private information smacks of Big Brother.
This could hurt working people in several ways: employers could deny otherwise legal workers jobs because they can’t affirmatively show adequate documents or because they have to deal with incorrect data in the government’s database. The U.S. government in effect is attempting to create a permission slip to work.
This will also likely create a situation where employers won’t hire someone because of their appearance afraid that a prospective employee’s ethnicity would cause them trouble in verifying their status. The right to work should not be impeded by a costly and ineffective verification system.

Michael Worrall
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 05:02 PM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Iran

Regarding Pres. Bush’s accusation that the Iranian government is supplying explosive devices to Iraqi insurgents: 1. Not a big surprise to us, who isn’t? We’ve seen Egyptians, Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrians, Saudis, etc., on the premises—-Iraq draws ‘em like a magnet. Are we going to attack those countries, too?
2. We don’t believe him. How can his “intelligence” tell the difference between an Iranian (soldier, weapon, or explosive) and the Iranian government itself when none of us can tell the difference between an Iranian and an Iraqi or a Sunni and a Shia or, on George Bush’s part, a real threat by WMD and a bogus war.
3. We don’t care, we told him to get out of there, didn’t we? We won’t be blaming Iran for the disaster that is Iraq, we’ll be blaming Pres. Bush and his political allies.

S.P. Wiliams
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 05:01 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Electoral College bill

More Unintended Consequences.
Senate bill 46 could be a major disaster because election error in another state could be contested in Colorado. Since Colorado Electors would be affected by voting errors in other states, fiascos in other states could be adjudicated in Colorado courts. A finding in a Colorado court that another state’s certification was illegal under Colorado law could change the way our Electors vote.
In the 2000 election, Florida’s dispute between it’s Supreme Court and Attorney General could have been contested in Colorado. Since the question was whether the Florida Attorney General had legally certified the election, and that decision would affect which candidate was the national popular vote winner, the Florida Attorney General’s certification of Florida’s results could be contested as invalid under Colorado law. SB 46 identifies the Attorney General’s ruling as final. The Florida Supreme Court ruled that it wasn’t final.
The US Supreme Court, in it’s most controversial ruling in history, held that the Attorney General’s certification was final for Florida. That holding would not be binding on Colorado because the issue would be how Colorado law applied to the Florida situation, not how Florida law applied.
There were contested issues in Washington State and Ohio. Those results could have been contested in Colorado also.
Each state’s top election official, as second guessed by the state Supreme Court, and the US Supreme Court would end up determining what the Florida, Washington State, and Ohio certifications should have been.

Yaakov “Jim” Watkins
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 05:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Flag-display bill

Now that the General Assembly is in session it is important to keep tabs on our local legislators. The recent case of Rep. Kevin Lundberg (R-Berthoud) and his distortions of HB-1050, Concerning the Display of Flags, proves this point.
A local North Colorado daily seems content to spread Rep. Lundberg’s misrepresentation of this bill to the detriment of our schools and veterans. Print appearances authored by Lundberg and his campaign finance contributors accuse that HB-1050 weakens protections for the US and Colorado flags.
This is blatantly untrue, but that doesn’t keep that message off of that editorial page. The truth is clear; HB-1050 allows the display of the POW/MIA flag from State flagpoles - Lundberg’s opposition makes it a crime to fly that flag. Also, HB-1050 retains the criminal offense for flying unauthorized flags.
Most importantly, HB-1050 returns control of policies for the classroom display of flags to local school boards. Rep. Lundberg’s issue with “...displaying other flags on public buildings...” seems directed at civics classes and schools that recognize and honor their current and past international exchange students. The public harm in that practice is dubious.
The reality of Rep. Lundberg’s opposition seems to be the combination of Democratic (as in the bill’s sponsors) and US Flag. This is a good bill that Rep. Lundberg and his campaign financiers cannot tolerate being carried by Democrats. That steals a campaign stereotype that they won’t be able to use in two years. Their only hope is to lie about the bill.

Ralph Trenary
Loveland

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:59 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Ed Stein

Ed Stein’s cartoon in the Rocky Mountain News on Friday, 2.16.07 was pathetic at best. His depiction of the two elderly persons sitting on the porch may seem accurate, one slumped in her wheel chair and the other head back and mouth open but I don’t think that this should be points of ridicule in the media.
One day many of us may be in this situation and we can only hope that there will be someone to care. Altho Ed’s reference to social security and medicare is clear, his depiction, in a cartoon, of the aged is very sad and in poor taste, especially for those looking at the cartoon in a retirement, assisted care or nursing home.
Lets all hope that the plight, and it is a plight, of the elderly in care centers will be considered in a caring way without malice, sadness or ridicule in the media.

Jon Takata
Thornton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:58 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Iraq war

The House resolution to oppose the President’s reinforcements in Iraq is, like the Senate version, bent on defeat. It is, in effect, another slapdash effort to politicize our troops and undermine the war on terror. It will fail. The White House will not be intimidated by such “non-binding” resolutions, which only embolden the enemy and prolong the war. We hear the Democrats say they support our troops, but not their mission. Well, it does not work that way. Our gallant troops are risking their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan. If the Democrats were supporting our troops, they would hardly be calling for their defeat. On the contrary, they would be demanding a resolution for victory! The enemy is not having this debate.

Brian Stuckey
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:57 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Abortion bill

It is hardly surprising that Senate Bill 43 went down to defeat. The Democrats have once again shown their true colors by voting against the measure that would have protected the life of the unborn. In this case, Democrats voted unanimously against the bill while Republicans voted unanimously in favor of it. It would appear that politics, not the value of human life, was the key factor for the opponents. In short, the Democrats have shown just who they really are. The facts speak for themselves.

Brian Stuckey
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:57 PM | Comments (34) | TrackBack

Labor bill veto

As a registered Republican, I applaud Gov. Ritter’s statesmanlike veto of the Labor bill. While I am aware that all employees of a company sometimes benefit from the actions of the union i’m basically against one being forced to pay dues to an organization to which he/she chooses not to join. An extended dialogue is appropriate since too many laws are passed without due consideration of the conseqences and, in some cases, the cost of enforcement.

Gene Sorte
Westminster

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:56 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

Jared Polis’ spin of minimizing his responsibility for Jared’s Law’s problems into his victimization is chutzpah on steroids.
If Polis is sincere, rather than play the victim (next we will hear he’s admitting himself into an Amendment 41 Rehab program), he should fund an indemnification pool for those losing scholarships etc due to the millions he spent for his poorly worded amendment creating these ‘unintended consequences.’ Yes, this funding may displace monies that otherwise would go to forward his political ambitions, but would fix some of these problems rather than playing the wah-wah-wah (victimizer playing the victim) card.
Poor,poor Jared - has he considered Subway Commercials making faux baloney sandwichs?

Jim Schwartz
Centennial

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:55 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Climate change

I was impressed and appreciative that the RMN ran the Opinion piece by Ross McKitrick in the February 10th edition of the paper on the issue of global warming, which is becoming truly “A Political Climate.” Dr. McKitrick is right on the mark about how this major issue has evolved into a very political issue and some of the “real” science is being missed or ignored.
The facts surrounding Global Warming are very technical and complicated to understand. Some of the aspects of how this important issue is being treated are reminiscent of how I remember my experiences when I was a member of the Technical Science Committee for the Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission. In the 1990s, this commission was formed to examine and make recommendations on the causes of deteriorating visibility in the Grand Canyon and other National Parks. After months of compiling and examining the real science of meteorological, atmospheric, and a variety of other anthropogenic and non-anthropogenic sources/causes for deteriorating visibility, the conclusions reached by the politically established commission absolutely ignored the real issues and science. Those factions – they called themselves environmentalists - wanting to establish that power plants and other smoke stack industries were the culprits for deteriorating visibility did their very best to skew the science and created a political atmosphere within the Commission and Western Governor’s Association. The result was recommendations that were very politically correct but way off the mark if a real solution to visibility was the objective. Society lost and will pay a very big bill for no or little effect in our National Parks. So too may be our dilemma with this issue of Global Warming if the real science is set aside and ignored for a more politically correct environment, as noted so well by Dr. McKitrick.

Paul Scheidig
Littleton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:54 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Columbus Day

It seems highly ironic that the governor and the legislature speak regularly about the importance of quality education in Colorado but are silent about continuing the historical fallacy of Columbus Day.
(Speakout, February 1). Not only are Colorado’s children deprived of accurate history with the continuing veneration of an Indian-killing, slave trader, but the moral messages that we project to them are also dubious. Is the lesson to our children: steal a car and you go to prison, steal a continent and you get a state and national holiday?
I’m afraid that is the lesson. We can change that by supporting Senator Suzanne Williams’ proposal.

K.A. Roulette
Sedalia

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:53 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Cable bill

In response to Vince Carroll’s 02.02.07 On-Point: Speakout: Cable Bill a loser, except for Qwest
Waiving the word “competition” madly about hardly negates the brazen attempt by Qwest to dismember a generations old commitment of equal access for consumers and equal opportunity for providers in the cable industry.
HB 1222, under current consideration in the General Assembly, disrespects local control of rights of way, taxpayer control of their community’s infrastructure, and the basic notion that fair is fair.
The only expansion of choice HB 1222 addresses is Qwest’s choice to pick and choose where and whom it serves at the detriment of those not chosen.
Will they have a duty to provide upgraded service opportunities to all citizens and all neighborhoods?
No.
Will they be required to work with communities to meet civic goals?
No.
Do they seek to include all cable providers under the new rules?
No.
Is there currently anything in the way of Qwest following the same rules as everyone else to enter the market?
No.
Would the new rules provide any penalty for failing to include existing areas in an upgrade?
No.
This debate was held 25 years ago.
And the policy result was “opportunity for all and local determination of local infrastructure."
Hardly catchy, but it is as sound now as it was then.
The Qwest push to go around community values and pick off the newest and most lucrative business for themselves and leave the rest of us in the dust is transparent and destructive.

Cathy Reynolds
Denver
served for 28 years on the Denver City Council; also served as president of both the National League of Cities and the Colorado Municipal League

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:51 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Climate change

In response to Mr. Harmening’s letter, 08FEB07, voicing his opinion about global warming, might I contribute a comment or two? Normally, I would just ignore a letter such as this, but his insights took the phrase, “from whole cloth,” to a new level of fabrication, and thus he presented the common reader with a view based on facts that might best be described as having come from an alternate reality.
An opinion needs to be backed by facts. Mr. Harmening tells the reader that his opinion is just as valid as those of the scientists in Boulder.
Might we take this form of logic to its extreme to demonstrate its fallacy? For example, imagine that NASA is of the opinion that our moon is composed of rock; my opinion is that the moon is made of green cheese. Do we dismiss NASA, and all their research, because they offer no proof contrary to mine? Thus, for Mr. Harmening, his opinion on climate change is like stating that the moon is green cheese: Cute idea for a child’s story, but with no factual footing to support the conclusion. Believing that an un-informed opinion is as valid as an informed one is very dangerous thinking, because it is detrimental for the education and well-being of everyone.
One very cold or warm winter, one very wet or dry summer, one mild or fierce hurricane season, are not good indicators of the long term effects of climate change. Even the short term weather trends need to be looked at in the context of millennia to fully appreciate current and future changes.
One other area that Mr. Harmening might want to explore is called “global dimming” and its relationship to climate change. Never heard of it? Well, you might then want to educate yourself about its reality and impact on everyone.
We continental Americans have such a small view of the larger world that we oft fail to see the suffering of others especially when due to a factor such as climate change because we do not see its impact immediately on our person. We do not want to see, or hear, or read about our own citizens who have already involuntarily moved, lost homes, or lost livelihoods, because of rising sea levels. If we did, we would realize and face the tragic human and economic consequences of rising water, and would be ashamed that not only did we not help but we perpetuated the fantasy that there is no such thing as global warming.
It is not a matter of whether or not to spend resources and money on this issue, because these are already being spent to stave off the devastating effects rising sea levels are having on the globe. Our meager resources should not be spent debating the reality of rising water, but should be carefully spent to help alleviate the current impact and to help allay future problems.
I don’t think it is up to the RMN to publish all the investigative work already available on the subject of rising sea levels. Let the media inform and the reader pursue further his or her own education on the subject. If a person does not have Internet access at home, try a public library computer and do a Google search on “rising sea levels", or find EPA publications (which are also on the web), and look through the research on global warming. Some of the readily available research goes back to the decade when the first George W. Bush was president - long before Al Gore came on the scene. Global warming is not a political idea or even a theory, but, rather, it is a scientific fact.
Sometimes the media, even the RMN, tends to use the future tense to describe the changes due to climate change/global warming. Rising seas are a reality and have been so for centuries. But, apparently, the only proof that would satisfy Mr. Harmening would be water rising up to his neck while standing on the Pacific shore. We could only hope, but, alas, geologic changes occur so slowly compared to our short lives that few us ever realize the full impact of global changes.
There is open debate about the causes of global warming, and any reasonable climatologist would admit to not having all the answers on its causation which is why research continues. But, I have never heard a Chicken Little comment from a scientist on this matter. Might Mr.
Harmening provide the sources for his comment and a definition of Chicken Little? I do not claim to know the number of scientist working in Boulder, but I can well imagine that they make up a fraction of all scientists, world wide, who study the climate and come to the same conclusions. Correct me if I am wrong.
Before dismissing the Chicken Little, eggheaded scientists, those who foist their opinions on the public might first become informed about a subject, and then offer arguments that are fact based and accurate. We are so inclined to criticize and dismiss others whose viewpoints are not our own rather than participate in constructive solutions. To Mr.
Harmening, and those of like ilk, a challenge: Show us your research that contradicts the interpretation of evidence gathered over decades and that would also refute the observable changes in the world’s climate.
None of us is ever 100% correct, but could we not strive to become informed before letting our ignorance become oh so public?

Bill Reagan
[No hometown provided]

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:50 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Snow removal

After the spectacle I witnessed this morning, I am outraged by an article in today’s Rocky about a possible property tax increase. Driving my child to South High School this morning, I came upon six huge snow trucks parked bumper to bumper and taking up 95% of this northbound lane of Franklin Street, waiting to dump snow (at least I THINK that’s what they were waiting for - there was no snow visible in the backs of any of the trucks!) at a dumpsite just south of South High School. As a Denver taxpayer, there were several things that instantly came to mind, mainly how much were these individuals being paid to park their trucks in a traffic lane with no parking allowed, drinking coffee, smoking cigarettes and eating their breakfasts, while obviously not caring in the least about the havoc and danger were creating in the area for parents trying to drop students off, or even worse, students trying to navigate their way across the street through this gigantic mess! I called Denver’s 311 number to alert someone and was told they would forward my complaint to Public Works. I figured yeah, a lot of good that’s gonna do! Then I go home and open my morning paper and read about a proposed tax increase. My response as a Denver taxpayer is NO NO NO NO and NO! No more of my money is going to go to waste supporting such ridiculous expenses as I witnessed this morning. Believe me, with three children to support, I have much better things to do with my money!

Margo Oswald
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:49 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Gangs

The Molkerie (milk barn) in Denver’s Montclair Park was designed c. 1898 as a health facility for citizens suffering from lung disease. It was there in 1899 and 1903 when my great-grandfathers, Will O’Shea and James McCarthy, died from consumption (lung disease). It was there in 1921 when my grandfather built his house in the 1500 block Ulster. It was there when I was a child who played in the park surrounding the edifice. And, it was there in 1987 when I was a Denver police sergeant who, at the request of the Montclair neighborhood organization, came to speak about the gang problem in Denver.
I remember this meeting for the aforementioned, and for the fact that as I walked toward the meeting room, Mayor Pena, who had just spoken, passed me in the hallway and said, “Don’t scare them, Dave.” I don’t recall my verbal response, but my immediate nonverbal thought was, “How do you talk about gangs in their community and not scare them?”
I knew that the city policy of ignoring gangs and they will go away was not a viable option, nor was the media distortion method a responsible approach to the situation. So, I did the Joe Friday method and gave them, “Just the facts.” The facts were that we had L.A. style gangs in Denver and they were associated with crack cocaine. Everything else associated with L.A. gangs would be integrated into Denver’s more passive, smaller neighborhood gangs of dysfunctional youth who were in the right place at the right time. They were youth looking for an identity and were perfect targets for the L.A. fast-talking, fast money, red and blue bandana waving gangsters who offered them notoriety as they fell through the cracks of society and addicted by the intoxication of gang membership.
I attempted to temper this “scare” with the more sobering facts that only a small percentage of those involved were active and hardcore, while others remained on the periphery. This is important to the police so that they can identify, isolated and incarcerate the hardcore and vital to the community so that they can deflect, direct and divert at-risk youth into viable programs. I explained that it was important to understand this degree of involvement so that the appropriate levels of resources can be directed to the appropriated levels of involvement. I am not sure if I alleviated their concerns, but I am convinced that they were scared later as the level of violence increased, as did the level of Media reports concerning the violence increased. Ultimately, Denver got a permanent L.A. style gang subculture foundation and the original gangsters (OG’s), almost all, got more than they bargained for-jail and death.
I reflected upon this community meeting when the Media recently began reporting on the ‘gang problem” in Denver after Denver Bronco Darrent Williams was shot and killed from someone inside a vehicle belonging to a “gang member.” This was followed by numerous media reports of past and present gang related incidents occurring in the Metro area and I wondered aloud if we were going to have gang hysteria in the Media or can this be toned down and reflect the true nature of the problem.
I do not intend to minimize the danger and costs gangs impose on society, nor deny that gang activity has increased. There is a generational swing in gang activity as the efforts of the police and community combine to remove gang members from the streets and reduce recruitment. However, the foundation for gangs is always there so that new generations of dysfunctional youth can fill the void left by those OG’s who died or were jailed. OG’s recently released from jail often go back to their neighborhoods and continue their gang activity, which helps to recruit young members. The new group of recruits is not a reflection on the lack of effort by the police and community, but a reflection of how enormous the problem of disconnected youth can be and how few resources there are available. In fact, there may be more resources trying to recruit youth, some unintentionally (movies and music reinforces the lifestyle), into the gang subculture So, how many gang members are there? It is important to challenge gang statistics that may inflate the numbers of actively involved gang members. Statistics can be unintentionally misleading because they can reflect data that may not differentiate between the levels of involvement of gang members, there can be inconsistencies in the collection of data, there may be data that has not been purged, there is duplicity in data, transient and incarcerated population can be reflected in the data, and erroneous data can be entered. This information needs to be accurate so that the appropriate resources can be directed to the appropriate problems.
Media reports of gang activity by their very nature are sensational, often unintentionally misleading and scare citizens. An accurate and timely message from the Mayor and the police department to groups like the Montclair citizen organization is critical to alleviate their fears and motivate them into action. The message should contain actual numbers of gang members, their degree of involvement, the impact their criminality has on the city and the steps taken by law enforcement to identify, isolate and incarcerate those committing crimes. It should also reflect the efforts of community groups, the DA’s office and the City to deflect gang recruitment, direct youth into alternative programs and divert first time offenders into treatment programs.
So, Mayor Hickenlooper, before the snow melts, just give them the facts, don’t scare them.

David O’Shea-Dawkins
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:48 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Evolution & faith

Darwinists Now Need Faith to defend Evolution! (Reaching out to Christians on evolution, Linda Seebach (Feb 10 2007)http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/opinion_columnists/article/0,2777,DRMN_23972_5341618,00.html
It seems inconceivable to me that a group (Christians) that Ms Seebach has ridiculed on numerous occasions in the RMN is now a brother in arms in her fight to preserve an evolution-based belief system that is under serious threat from the Intelligent Design, Fined Tuned Universe and other theories. As Ms. Seebach surely knows, it is not new news that some theologians support the evolution theory; even back in Darwin’s day it had it’s supporters among the clergy. It is just more evidence Darwinists are panicking over the increasing number of main stream scientists who have found evolution theory lacking, especially since the discovery of DNA and the irreducible complexity that it seems to exhibit. But, I had no idea that the panic had reached such a threshold as to cross-over and actually embrace those religious people whose beliefs rest on faith (read ignorance) instead of science (read intelligence).The clergy should remain in the tradition of guiding their flocks in finding God and the scientists should let the latest scientific evidence take them wherever it ends up, even if that is an intelligent designer. It would seem that Darwinian evolution theory is taking more and more faith these days to believe?

Lee Long
Westminster

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:25 PM | Comments (33) | TrackBack

‘Final Salute’

I lived in Denver for 45 years; now I live in Coeur D’Alene, Idaho.
Your Final Salute” is the most beautiful thing I have ever seen by a newspaper. The Pulitzer is well deserved.
I have forwarded this to my entire address book. My friends will appreciate the tribute.

P.F. Kuenzinger
Coeur D’Alene, Idaho

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:25 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Littleton Wal-Mart

During the City Council hearings to rezone property on the Platte River to build a 24/7 Super Wal-Mart store, the City of Littleton demonstrated that it was willing to bend their own laws to bring in a Wal-Mart. They also used confusion and coercive measures to repress the voice of its own citizens.
Employing unconsititutional quasi-judicialterminology, the City told us that they could not listen to its citizens. They said they couldn’t accept e-mails, letters or other forms of communication including talking with our own city council representatives. In an e-mail from Amy Conklin she said I can’t be influenced by conversations or other information not presented during the public hearing. City Council members told us that our only opportunity to present our views was in testimony to City Council during the hearings. So what did the citizens do? They showed up at the public hearing only to be ignored by City Council members. Newspapers reported there were over four hundred people in attendance. Of those attending, less than 10 citizens supported the Wal-Mart. Since when is it against the law to discuss issues with your own publically elected representatives? The City tried to limit our ability to speak. At the City Council meeting just prior to the Wal-Mart hearing, residents were allowed four minutes to speak. At the Wal-Mart hearing it went down to three minutes. That doesn’t sound like much, but consider that citizens in other hearings, citizens were allowed to cede their time to others to increase their speaking time. Not only that, the City tried to stop people from wearing T-Shirts to the hearing. Only after a threat of a lawsuit and national publicity did the city back down.
During the hearing, city officials said they will disregard its own laws. Littleton has a law that limits unloading of trucks within 800 feet of a residential area between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. The proposed location is only a few feet from two residential neighborhoods. The City Attorney and Staff told us that this rule didn’t apply in this situation and can only be enforceable if someone complains. Furthermore, the City Staff then insinuated that they probably wouldn’t enforce the law since there would not be enough resources to address the complaints. So the City Council has told its residents that they have no recourse from the noise at the proposed Wal-Mart property. This is a blatant disregard for the law.
The City and City Council disregarded three other areas of the law. First, the City Council ignored its own signage laws that would have forbidden Wal-Mart to put up huge and gaudy signs along Santa Fe. Second, the State of Colorado has a law that requires a supermajority vote, or a 5 to 2 City Council vote when people around the perimeter of the property obtain signatures stating they are against a development. The residents submitted the signatures to the City. The City promptly ignored this request by claiming Littleton was exempt from this law since it is a home rule city. Third, the City did not put up large enough signs that could have been read from the proposed property to announce the Planning Commission Meetings. This was against the City’s own laws.
City Staff should not construe the law to find any means possible to bring in Wal-Mart. The City is trying to hoodwink us by using legalese and deceptive arguments to muddle the issues so we, the citizens, won’t understand them. What ever happened to transparency? City Council and city staff are saying that we, the citizens, don’t matter. The City of Littleton works for us, not Wal-Mart.

Linda Knufinke
Littleton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:24 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Maria Elena Salinas

In her column of Feb. 9, Maria Elena Salinas attacks U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo for his calling Congress hypocritical. Why hypocritical? For its sanctioning its caucuses based exclusively on race from one side of its mouth, then from the other side extolling the virtues of a color-blind society.
This charge, Salinas says, shows that Tancredo has “a problem ... with people of color.” Salinas has a problem—with the truth.
Fact: Congressional caucuses based on race are indeed “divisive and contrary to a colorblind society.”
Congressman Tancredo is to be applauded, not denigrated, for standing up for equal opportunity for ALL of us Americans on a level playing field.

Charles L. King
Boulder

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:23 PM | Comments (17) | TrackBack

Helmet bill

It is a shame that more thorough research was not done before this proposed legislation (HB 1117) was written. The efficacy of a law requiring helmets to protect children from death or injury must be questioned when the proposed bill states the required helmet is to “Meet or exceed the standards established in US Department Of Transportation Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 218, 49 CFR 571.218, for motorcycle helmets.” Did anyone involved in the drafting of this bill actually read these standards? Do our representatives realize that FMVSS218 does not include the testing of helmets on any actual persons? This standard does not even include any testing done on crash-test dummies. The tests that were done to establish this standard were done on a headform only, without the neck or body being considered — and seem to consist of protecting this headform without regard to the actual application of the helmet on a human head.
The average helmet meeting FMVSS218 weighs 3 pounds. This much additional weight applied to the head causes an increased stress to be applied to the neck by increasing the effective mass on the end of the spinal column. This stress is multiplied by sudden movements such as those involved in an accident may cause the spine to be hyperextended, greatly increasing the chance of paralysis or permanent spinal cord injury. Any force to the front of the helmet will force the head back, applying a massive sheering force to the person’s neck from the rear lower edge of the helmet itself, bruising or severing the spinal cord. Impacts to the side of the head will effectively apply a twisting force to the spinal column. These injuries are even more likely when considering their effect on a child’s less-developed muscles and weaker spinal structure.
Even the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has questioned the effectiveness of FMVSS218 when they stated “Data which have recently come to our attention raise a question whether motorcyclists who wear the present standard safety helmets which reduce severe or serious injuries to the head and face, may suffer some degree of counter balancing increase in fatal neck injuries ... Whereas the finding is not conclusive, the implication is sufficiently strong that the Board believes the subject should be further investigated without delay.” The study referred to stated: “ ... wearing a helmet is associated with greatly reduced fatal head injury, but greatly increased fatal neck injury.”
A study completed by Dr. Jonathan P. Goldstein looked at “The Effect of Motorcycle Helmet Use on the Probability of Fatality and the Severity of Head And Neck Injuries” and the results stated in part: “a tradeoff between head and neck injuries confronts a potential helmet user. Past a critical impact speed to the helmet (13 mph), which is likely to occur in real life accident situations, helmet use reduces the severity of head injuries at the expense of increasing the severity of neck injuries.”
FMVSS218 does NOT even provide a list of approved helmets. Furthermore, when asked for a list of approved helmets, the NHTSA itself has stated “While NHTSA can identify helmets that have passed the agency’s compliance tests, that is not the same as “approving” those helmets.” If a government agency issues a list of “approved” helmets and someone is injured as a result of a defective helmet appearing on that list, the government might be liable for damages.
The best possible means to reduce injuries and death due to motorcycle accidents is to prevent those accidents in the first place. Prevention is best accomplished through education, for motorcycles riders and the general motoring public. When motorcycles are operated soberly and responsibly and other vehicle operators are aware of motorcycles on the road, there are fewer accidents involving motorcycles. Fewer accidents mean fewer deaths and injuries, it’s that simple.

Robert L. Johnson
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:22 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Labor bill veto

Last week, Democractic Governor Ritter issued his first veto. The veto came against a Democrat-initiated labor bill. It came as a complete surprise to the Democrat-controlled legislature. There was no warning from the governor’s office at any stage as the bill made a tortuous way through the legislature, even requiring Democrats to endure an 8-hour filibuster by Republicans. Many legislators put their reputations on the line. Since candidate-Ritter had endorsed the measure, legislators assumed Governor Ritter would sign it. Not so.
Bill Ritter not only endorsed the measure, he campaigned on it. With his campaign support of this particular labor measure, he raised money, got endorsements and generated votes. His betrayal of this position has taken his supporters by surprise and left them wondering just who they elected. Yet, labor-backers have been told Governor Ritter is still their friend and will support their causes and so it appears they will hold their tongue and refrain from pointing out the obvious.
It is always troublesome when someone lies to you. It is particularly troublesome when you thought the liar was a friend. And it makes you mad enough to spit when that friend took money or support from you and abandons you for new friends when he got what he came for. Unions play an important part not only in making our work places safe and fair, but they also represent long-time allies in the Democratic party. They deserve better than this action on the part of Governor Ritter. He could have told labor, “not now", or “don’t send it up yet” or, if he were an honest man, “don’t send it up because I won’t sign it even though I promised I would.” Instead, he lead them on and humiliated labor, its supporters and several Democratic legislators.
What benefit did he hope to gain? For what price did he abandon long- time supporters and break his campaign promise? We are told by unofficial sources he vetoed the measure to gain business support for other measures such as universal health coverage. Even darker machiavellian machinations hint that the Governor knew the measure was veto proof and hoped to trick dim-witted Republicans into thinking he was on their side. Officially though, Ritter inexplicably claims “there wasn’t enough dialogue". I say its either a foolish waste or the act of a dishonest man for while he may see a moral distinction between a lie to a Republican and a lie to a Democrat, I say there is none.
Lest we forget, candidate-Ritter stood in the living rooms of gay and lesbian Democrats and pledged to our community his undying support of GLBT civil rights, stating he believed those rights to be fundamental - magic words in our legal profession. It means these are rights we are born with, rights that are so important they can only rarely be LIMITED by law, and never CREATED by law. So passionate was he about this belief that we stepped up and supported him with our time, talent and treasure. But mere hours after being elected, Ritter stood on the front steps of the captial and declared Referendum I dead, stating “the people have spoken.” What happened to fundamental rights? Yet we were told, he’s still our friend, don’t make waves, and my personal favorite, “he didn’t really mean it.”
Candidate-Ritter was a friend to Democratic voters. Governor Ritter is not. He has twice now sold out our causes for some hypothetical future gain. But I say a man willing to lie to get what he wants should never be trusted. Such a man is morally deficient - “a dog who bites". An honest man, on the other hand, sticks with his friends and defends them even at his own expense. Governor Ritter is not an honest man. I will not support him. I will not defend him. And I will hope for his replacement by an honest man - even if he’s a Republican.

M. David Johnson
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:21 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Seat-belt bill

I am totally disgusted with the state Democratic Party at this moment. I usually agree with Democrats on issues, but the supporters of Senate Bill 151 (Seat Belt enforcement) have me steamed! With attempting to make seat belt use a primary offense, Democrats are selling out our freedom of choice and personal liberty for a one-time fee of $14 million. That is what our freedom apparently is worth to state Democrats. Shameful.
Democratic Representative Morgan Carroll and most Republicans have it right (I never thought I would say Republicans have got anything right), this bill will lead to abuses. Get ready Colorado! You will now be subject to more traffic checkpoints that will be used as a revenue stream, more cops taken off the streets that would normally be looking for REAL criminals and a lot more racial profiling. How do I know this? Because I lived in New Mexico. New Mexico has become a police state and these abuses and silly priorities go on all the time down there. Ask anyone from there. It is one of the main reasons I moved.
So while Democrats are so worried about whether a taxpaying, law abiding citizen like myself is not wearing a safety device, I find it ironic that not one Democrat has brought up a bill for tougher laws and penalties for graffiti “artists.” Our beautiful town is beginning to look like a world class ghetto because of all these “taggers,” but a law abiding adult CHOOSING not to wear a safety device is what they focus on?
Democrats, we voted you in to tackles real problems in our state, and you in turn bring back needless “nanny state” issues like this? It is distorted priorities like this that put you in the minority to begin with. Ask the Republicans where their whole idiotic “Guns, God and Greed” agenda has gotten them! I am begging the state Dems to reconsider this bill. It is not needed and will turn off alot of voters. Myself and others who I have spoken with will be watching who does in fact sell out my personal liberty. You can count on me never voting for anyone who supports this. If you can’t defend freedom, you are not needed. The real criminals in Colorado whom you are doing nothing about will love you though ...

James M. Holmes
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:20 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Mideast peace

The Democrat leaders, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, say we must talk about peace with Syria and Iran, both of which are aiding insurgents in Iraq.
Before we could begin talks, we must decide what we would offer, or give up, to these countries. Do we offer to let them destroy Israel? To make nuclear bombs? To invade Lebanon? To sponsor terrorism freely? That is what they want. We want only for themto leave Iraq and Lebanon alone, and stop trying to make bombs. What is the common ground?
To end this disagreement over whether or not to talk to these coutries, let us invite them to a meeting and see if they show up. The meeting should be convened in Tel Aviv, Israel.

Bill Harrison
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:19 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Gambling

I would like to offer some contrary arguments to the letter of the 15th, concerning Mike Rosen’s comments, by Jay Lillien of Denver.
Forget about the slot machines available in Blackhawk,etc. they are the casino’s biggest moneymakers, if the casino takes in y number of dollars in a given time period they will win x number of dollars,everyday, everytime, it’s that simple. Playing machines is mindboggling dumb, unless you think you are lucky enough to overcome the huge advantage the house has over you. But it is the only way to make a big score[like the lottery, another bad bet].
However when it comes to blackjack Mr. Lillien, like a lot of other people are under the mistaken assumption that card counting actually works,it doesn’t , I don’t care what you have read or heard.
If it did, no casino in Las vegas would offer it,as they would lose and they are not there to lose. And yes I am an expert, I’ve spent more time at a black table than i can count.
The problem in Blackhawk,etc. as far as players are concerned is the $5.00 limit. It is virtually impossible to play the house every hand for the same amount as any statistician will tell you on average you are going to lose more hands than the house by virtue of the fact you have to hit a bad hand before the house does anything.
However, if the limits are raised, every 2nd,3rd hand etc. you can raise your bet and recover from several losing hands. Yes they do need to raise the limits on blackjack and until they do I’ wouldn’t think of playing the house. And I wpuldn’t recommend anybody else did either.

Steven Harmening
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:19 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Libby trial

C’mon guys, word on the street now is that Libby’s leverage for a presidential pardon, if convicted, was his option to call Cheney as a witness. Cheney’s not going to have to testify now, thus avoiding a withering cross by Fitzerald; so I guess a pardon trade-off is in the bag should a guilty verdict be returned.

Sterling Greenwood
Aspen

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:18 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Teachers

As I read “Attack on students off base,” the Jan. 27 Speakout column by North High School teacher John Dumbleton regarding the Jan. 13 Speakout by a former North High teacher (“North High teachers take fall for inert students, bureaucratic bog”), my first thought was, Hats off to you, Mr. Dumbleton — our schools need more teachers like you!”
I am in my 50s but, to this day, I remember two teachers from high school who made a lasting impression upon me. They had an innovative way of teaching that kept the whole class involved and interested in what they were teaching. They had a passion and it was felt by all of us. If a teacher does not show this passion, the students pick up on this and will learn absolutely nothing from the class.
Too often there are teachers who couldn’t care less about their students and hide behind the union whenever anyone proposes a postive change for our children’s education.
All of us as a community need to be a positive force in the changes that are necessary to provide the education that all children deserve.
Mr. Dumbleton, you are not inexperienced or idealistic, you are the standard of what all teachers should strive for: You beleive in your students.

Rose Goldberg
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:16 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Veterans

To the young men & women who are thinking about joining the military. Think hard before making your decision.
Sure, they will talk about Patriotism, killing the enemy, axis of evil, etc.
This is all fine & dandy unless you get hurt.
Mr. Bush, you should be ashamed. You go around pinning purple hearts on wounded warriors, telling them how proud they’ve made you. You may even shed a tear for them.
Right. That is why you want to slash/or cutback on the funding for care of V A. patients. Who is going to suffer Mr. Bush? Are these young people going to have a co-pay on their prosthetics? Are the people that have severe adjustment problems, because they were forced to serve 3 or 4 tours going to be tossed on the street because of lack of funding? Are people in the V.A. nursing homes with severe head wounds going to have to sit in their own Feces for long periods of time, because the V.A. does not have the funds to hire nurses? I have a better idea, why don’t you take the money you use on useless Mars expeditions to balance the budget. Humans can not get it right on Earth, yet want to go to Mars? Give me a break.

Michael Franzen
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:15 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Junk mail bill

In response to your editorial dated February 16, 2007 entitled, “Is junk mail so bad?” (http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/editorials/article/0,2777,DRMN_23964_5355495,00.html#), please be even-handed and print my opinion also: Opt-Out Law would be fair to everyone.
The proposed Colorado “Do not mail” is an Opt-Out law. Only those not desiring advertising mail need opt-out. Anyone desiring advertising mail can do nothing - and continue to receive it. Why deny those wishing to avoid advertising mail the power to do so?
I do not consider handling unwanted advertising placed against my will on my personal property to be a civic obligation!
The US Supreme Court said in the Rowan case in 1970, ““In today’s [1970]complex society we are inescapably captive audiences for many purposes, but a sufficient measure of individual autonomy must survive to permit every householder to exercise control over unwanted mail. To make the householder the exclusive and final judge of what will cross his threshold undoubtedly has the effect of impeding the flow of ideas, information, and arguments that, ideally, he should receive and consider. Today’s merchandising methods, the plethora of mass mailings subsidized by low postal rates, and the growth of the sale of large mailing lists as an industry in itself have changed the mailman from a carrier of primarily private communications, as he was in a more leisurely day, and have made him an adjunct of the mass mailer who sends unsolicited and often unwanted mail into every home.
It places no strain on the doctrine of judicial notice to observe that whether measured by pieces or pounds, Everyman’s mail today is made up overwhelmingly of material he did not seek from persons he does not know. And all too often it is matter he finds offensive.”
Furthermore, the Supreme Court said, “the mailer’s right to communicate is circumscribed only by an affirmative act of the addressee giving notice that he wishes no further mailings from that mailer.
To hold less would tend to license a form of trespass and would make hardly more sense than to say that a radio or television viewer may not twist the dial to cut off an offensive or boring communication and thus bar its entering his home. Nothing in the Constitution compels us to listen to or view any unwanted communication, whatever its merit; we see no basis for according the printed word or pictures a different or more preferred status because they are sent by mail.”
We need a Colorado “Do Not Mail” law to create a one-stop, convenient place for homeowners to give senders the aforementioned affirmative notice that we do not want certain kinds of mail sent to our homes.

Ramsey A. Fahel
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:14 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Labor bill veto

In what constitutes a new low in political double speak, Governor Ritter vetoed a labor bill, HB 1072, that would have eliminated state interference in the right of workers to organize. He vetoed the bill he had long supported because it was rushed through the legislature, he said, without considering the feelings of the opposition. Then, in one of those head-scratching, Yogi Bera moments, he added that the opposition had practiced ugly tactics. Feel edified? The bill was simple and should have received wide endorsement, for it saved taxpayers money by getting the state out of running union elections. We do not insist on establishing binding rules for running corporate board meetings. Neither do we insist that corporate boards achieve a super majority before it can adopt policy. But that is exactly what labor faces. To organize, a work place must have three votes, one to invite a union into the workplace for discussions, a second simple majority vote to become a union shop, and a third “gotcha” vote requiring a 75 percent super majority before it can really happen. Then the union still has to bargain with management over wages and benefits. The bill would have eliminated the super majority, triple-jeopardy vote which is paid for with state taxes.
I voted for Ritter, for he impressed me in one limited conversation on resource issues as sincere and decent. But this veto troubles me.
He sure needs to remind himself that since the Bush crowd has been in office, 5.4 million middle-class Americans have slipped into poverty. Indeed, working families have not seen an increase in real buying power since 1999. All the while, bonuses on Wall Street have reached the $60 million threshold, while CEO’s are receiving golden parachutes up to $400 million (Exxon), thanks in great measure to Bush’s tax cuts for the rich, the one percent who control more wealth than bottom 90 percent.
Governor, you need to respect the bottom 90 percent by helping level the playing field. And HB 1072 is the best of all possible worlds; it is budget friendly. I look forward to a favorable vote when a new labor-rights bill hits your desk this session.
The top one percent can afford to bargain in good faith with those who have helped create their wealth.
Oh, and Governor, if you really want to help the folk out, veto the bill working its way through the legislature that sets aside $19 million annually in a gift to the tourism industry. It will be an off-budget, recurring gift out of the Severance tax.
We voted this giveaway down by a huge majority a couple of years when it was a ballot initiative. It is the darling of the top one percent, the same bunch who cried wolf over worker rights.

Phil Doe
Littleton
Chair, Citizens Progressive Alliance

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:13 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Propaganda or science?

A recent L.A. Times article easily demonstrates how the liberal press and leftist academia use the truth to foist a lie on us. “Take the spin out of science” by Chris Mooney and Alan Sokal states, and rightly so, that there is bad or nonexistent “science” being taught in our schools and promoted throughout our culture. He chastises “Postmodern Science” as nothing but opinions masquerading as the real thing. He is right. While we are agreeing, however, he does a switch, trotting out the Postmodern pseudoscience as the real thing and the real thing as postmodern psudoscience. A neat trick that is as old as the hills. He states it is the “Republicans and fundamentalist Christians who are forcing their views on us. When was the last time we had major schools run by them?? His examples are refusal to accept global warming and evolution . Without going into massive detail this paper will not allow, the high level of modern science disproving both of these as fallacies many times over, and the massive amount of easy to find material confirming this, it is reasonable to assume that papers that print these articles know they are engaged in pure propaganda. Modern microbiology has destroyed the evolution myth years ago and honest scientists readily admit it. Everyone knows the Sun cycles causes global climate change and it is easily proven. So why support these positions in the face of massive evidence to the contrary? Simple, one destroys belief in God, the other is a lead in for the blame-America crowd. Both leftist positions promoted by a left leaning press and a far left academia. You will also note the evidence for the other side is NEVER printed or discussed. That is the classic example of propaganda vs. education, one side only discussions. By the way, you can get massive amounts of real science confirming both on the internet. Just look it up, if your politics will let you, that is.

David Cook
Loveland

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:12 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Obama & Lincoln

Obama and Lincoln analogy? Please!
I’ve been reading about how Senator Barack Obama is comparing himself to Abraham Lincoln in that both had only served a short time in Congress before running for President. He really drove the point home by announcing his candidacy at the Old State Capital in Springfield, Illinois, where Lincoln made his famous “House Divided” speech in 1858.
“We’re just hoping to borrow a little of that Lincoln aura,” said Obama spokesman, Robert Gibbs.
Oh this is rich! Remember what happened to Senator Dan Quayle when questioned about his experience to be VP? He said JFK was also relatively inexperienced when he ran for President, and both Democrats and the media tore Quayle apart for that remark. I doubt Sen. Obama will ever draw the same criticism, even if he were to show up to his next speech wearing a stovepipe hat!

Richard Colwell
Parker

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:11 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Xcel & pollution

So after six great, smog filled days, where if you were outside for more than 15 minutes you started coughing, what else needs to happen before our government (State and Federal) do something?
All the weather did was move the bad air to someone else’s area!
We have cars on the roads that do not and could never pass any emission tests. If you can afford to drive a car you can afford to have it meet current epa emissions standards; this is not the case. Have you driven on the roads behind “new” diesel pick up trucks in the morning or trucks? You can hardly breath. Cars with out of state plates don’t need emissions testing, Pueblo does not even do it and I don’t know about Colorado Springs.
Xcel Energy is pushing mercury and nitrites into the are to the point where they are restricting access to Estes Park by car. Are you kidding me? So what does Xcel do, they say “we are going to review the test data” and of course we will build more coal fired plants that cause this problem!
Now we have the gas patch in the Rockies spewing all sorts of fumes from unregulated engines and the like and burning the soil with salt water from the drilling. And why is our State government giving them time to get this under control? Most of us live and love Colorado for the open spaces and “clean” air.
What needs to happen before something is done!?!

Joseph Calarco
[No hometown provided]

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:10 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Snow removal

Now that the 7 weeks of 7 snowstorms is over, for a time, and countless citizens of this city are still griping about the snow and ice on the neighborhood streets, all I have to say to you gripers is: “Go back to California or Texas!”
In years past when I lived in Potter Highlands and we had major snowstorms and cold spells, the neighbors of my block would pool our resources and buy bags of rock salt and use it on the street in front of our house. It worked great to keep our street clear of ice and none of us spent more than $50 per winter.
While you gripers sit watching moronic sitcoms and wait for the city to come to your aid, you will, come summer, gripe about the heat and water restrictions.
Grow up you gripers, or move back to your “land of luxury” where you came from. This native of Colorado is sick of you.

Dave Brown
Englewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:09 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Iran

Because it is obvious President Bush and his administration manipulated and manufactured evidence to back their ill conceived invasion and occupation of Iraq, people are understandably wary of claims the President makes. When Bush declared Iran as part of the axis of evil, and actively supported Iranian moderates, he helped turn back years of Iran’s drift to moderation, giving candidate Mahmoud Ahmadinejad needed political ammunition for his campaign.
Indeed Ahmadinejad is extreme in his pronouncements but so is Bush.
Before Americans jump on the Bush wagon to vilify and invade Iran, they should consider how the Iranians view the circumstances in their neighborhood. The U.S. installed, trained and supported the abusive Shah’s of Iran. (1953-1979) The U.S. once supported Saddam Hussein in his war against Iran, including the use of chemical weapons. Now we have invaded Iraq under false pretenses and without U.N. sanction, and as an occupying force have failed to live up to international law regarding occupying forces providing security there. Bush has also reintroduced indefinite detentions, torture, abuse and chemical weapons in the region. Bush has sold nuclear weapons technology to Pakistan and India and has no qualms with Israel’s secret (Shhhhh!) nuclear program, or its use of U.S. cluster bombs on civilian populations in Lebanon last summer.
It is no longer secret that Bush has had his sites set on Iran.
Unlike the U.S. Iran actually shares a border with Iraq, and has as much interests there as we do. Bush has actively refused to engage in diplomatic relations or talks with Iran, and very likely has been sending U.S. Special Forces units into Iran. The U.S. has the most foreign fighters in Iraq, and Bush administration goals there should be met with extreme suspicion by Iranians, Americans, and the world.

Mark Benner
Anton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:08 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Amendment 41 & smoking

I’m finding it hilarious that our state legislators are moaning over the consequence of Amendment 41. As they scramble to find ways to “fix” it, they also fear going against the will of the voters. To cover their attempts to circumvent the amendment they float the story that “the voters didn’t realize what they voted for - gee, they didn’t realize the consequences, right?’ Why I am amused by this is that our governance is getting a dose of what they dished out in 2006. They too have been mandated by a group bent on controlling the them with no compromise - and they don’t like it a bit. Perhaps, although I doubt this will penetrate their stiff resolve , our representatives can now understand what they did to 20% plus or minus of our populace and many business owners now ruined by the passing of draconian anti-smoking legislation. Different issues, but the same principle.
A truly fair and representative government of ALL the people would have allowed business owners to accommodate either smokers only, or non-smokers only, at the choice of the owner. Only the most rabid would fail to see the fairness of this approach. The current rhetoric citing the “health” of the wait-staff completely ignores the fact that wait-staff certainly have an abundance of non-smoking places to work and workers at businesses that allow smoking are themselves mostly, if not all, smokers. It’s called “freedom of choice.”
The anti-smoker brigade has been for many years incrementally pursuing legislation with one goal in mind - to FORCE people against their will to quit smoking using every means possible including outright falsehoods. Sadly, our legislators opted to troll for votes in an election year convinced that “democracy” was guiding this legislation when in reality it was intense well-financed advertising and lobbying.
Now that our representatives have themselves been stung by the consequences of bad law, perhaps they will correct their failure to be fair and stop heaping “nanny-state” laws on their constituents. I can only hope.

Susie Adamson
Montrose

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:07 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Ritter’s true colors

Congratulations to Gov. Bill Ritter on his veto of HB 1072. He has displayed his true colors — yellow, surrounded by red, and I thank him for helping to decide who I won’t be voting for in the next governor’s election.

Doug Barker, Fort Morgan

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

White officers can forget advancement

In the recent article, “Police chief’s pick stuns black leaders” (Feb. 8), I see that black police officers are shocked and Latino police officers are happy yet want more. But I have not heard from the White Police Officers Association on what they think. Oh, that’s right, this type of group would be considered racist.
In reviewing the numbers by the Rocky Mountain News, white males make up 31 percent of upper-level administration compared to 23 percent white females, 23 percent Hispanic males, 15 percent black females, and 8 percent black males. It appears that females and minorities make up 69 percent of police management, which seems to be more than equal to the diversity of the population in Denver.
So, what is equality? Are we as a nation really striving for the “best qualified” or is there always going to be an asterisk next to that theory (* the best qualified as long as you are a minority).
I can only imagine there are extremely well-qualified individuals in the ranks of white male officers, yet, as a group, I guess the thought of moving up is far-fetched. Maybe I am mistaken, but I did not see anyone from this racial group even considered for the division chief position and I am wondering if anyone will be considered for the commander position.
Equality and fairness — only in certain eyes.

Stephanie Park, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Krauthammer tries a diversion

Charles Krauthammer’s Feb. 5 column, “Blame America first and last,” is an attempt to distract us from the catastrophe that Bush and the neo-cons have created. They took us into an illegal war against a country that was not a threat to the U.S.
Before the attack, people who knew Iraq warned against the outbreak of a civil war there, but our chicken-hawk leaders ignored them. Guess what, Bush and the neo-cons were wrong about a civil war, just as they were wrong on almost everything else about Iraq.
What is truly amazing is that Krauthammer and other pundits such as Bill O’Reilly, Rush Limbaugh and William Kristol still have jobs. In the real world, anyone with such a lousy track record would have been fired a long time ago. But here they are again aiding Bush by peddling the same story they used in fomenting a war against Iraq to build support for an attack on Iran. I hope the American public doesn’t fall for the bogus claims from these neo-conmen a second time.
We need to demand that Congress stops these folks from attacking Iran and committing additional war crimes in our names.

Ron Forthofer, Longmont

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (32) | TrackBack

Religious views don’t enter into it

The Rocky’s Linda Seebach (“Reaching out to Christians on evolution,” Feb. 10) thinks that the Discovery Institute’s announcement of 700 scientists who now dispute Darwin’s theory of evolution on scientific grounds is trumped by 10,555 signatures on a letter by clergy who think evolution is just fine.
How does that comparison make any sense?
Since when, in the eyes of the media, are scientists’ arguments on a science question refuted by clergy? We could come up with a list of far more clergy who believe that God, not chance mutations acting on by natural selection, created life on Earth, but so what?
The point is that — while Darwinists claim virtually all scientists agree that life arose by chance mutations and natural selection — we are showing that increasing numbers of scientists do not agree with that theory.
The question of religious views is a different matter altogether.

Bruce Chapman, Seattle
President, Discovery Institute

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (18) | TrackBack

Disposable liberties

Like the Rocky Mountain News (“Green light for cabbies,” Jan. 29), I’m glad Rep. Jerry Frangas has introduced House Bill 1114, which would partially free up the taxi industry. But why did it take a legislator’s personal hardship (he and his wife not being able to find a cab on New Year’s Eve) to make this happen? It often seems as if our liberties are utterly disposable unless our ruling-class mandarins are directly affected. That’s just not right.
What if Frangas was lucky enough to have quickly hailed a cab that night? Then the rest of us would continue to suffer under these terrible monopoly-promoting regulations, apparently.
The default condition should be freedom to start businesses and voluntarily trade with others, not the other way around.

Will Devanter, Wheat Ridge

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Same here, Senator?

In a recent broadcast interview (Feb. 5 on CBS 4), Sen. Ken Salazar discussed his proposal to redeploy U.S. forces to Iraq’s borders. Their mission would be to prevent foreign infiltration and ensure the sovereignty of Iraq. Perhaps the senator would consider the same option for this country. If it’s good enough for Iraq, isn’t it good enough for the United States?

Alan Hale, Brighton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (24) | TrackBack

Littleton turns its back on the people

In the election of 2000, the city of Littleton asked its voters to forgo their TABOR refunds in order to purchase the Central Construction property as “open space ... that will serve to protect South Platte Park (Littleton Report, August, 2003).”
On Jan. 30, the Littleton City Council (with no independent environmental, economic, traffic or crime studies) voided voter intent and misused the public trust by approving a proposal to subsidize a retention pond for Wal-Mart on this property. The taxpayers will fund maintenance of the retention pond for as long as Wal-Mart owns the adjoining property.
The irony is that even if Wal-Mart’s promises of increased sales-tax revenue are realized, the city will be required to refund the excess to the taxpayers under TABOR.
Because the council has the discretion to redefine ballot issues after the fact, I will never again approve a TABOR request, no matter how reasonable it sounds.
I paid for open space, but I bought Wal-Mart’s toxic waste.

Cassandra Medrano, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Understand the issue

Let Amendment 41 be a lesson to Colorado voters. Do not vote for the sound bite!
Read and understand what you are voting for before casting your ballot.
The next time you vote for a Jared Polis-supported issue, make sure that it’s the one that fixes the mess he helped make with Amendment 41.
Until then you get to live with your vote on 41.
I voted no.

Chad Otto, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

February 17, 2007
A dimmer Spotlight

In general, I feel rather neutral about the changes I see in the Rocky Mountain News; most are fine. There is one change, however, that I find extremely negative: the overall look and readability of the Spotlight section.
Visually or aesthetically, it is messy; it feels cluttered. Not being trained in print design, I’m not able to really analyze the specific effect of all the changes, but somehow the combination of the font used for articles (please go back to the Times New Roman, or similar, that used to be used and is found throughout all the other sections of the paper), the black lines used around columns, and perhaps the sizing and spacing of articles vs. ads — all of this (and more?) now makes trying to the read the Spotlight section an annoying experience. It used to be a pleasant way to finish my daily newspaper reading. No more.

Pam Faro, Broomfield

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

A pleasure to read

In regard to your new paper layout: I think it is grand. I can sit in my chair and hold it without it coming apart. I like the new type. If people cannot read it, they need new glasses. The new paper is such a pleasure to read. I like the way it is so informative. Disregard all the fogies who cannot like any item that is new.

Charles Smith, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Boyles goes too far

I am reaching out to those whose powerful and positive influence can make a difference and hope that they can put an end to the prejudice, badgering and racial injustice KHOW radio talk-show host Peter Boyles encourages toward the Latin community.
This letter is in response to Boyles’ attacks on the Abraham Lincoln High School’s boys basketball program on Jan. 29.
In his derisive comments about a player who could speak only Spanish, Boyles has once again proven himself to be ignorant, malicious and sarcastic. He has managed to perpetuate hatred among his community of listeners and has encouraged an onslaught of threats toward students and staff at Lincoln High; specifically death threats made to the head basketball coach.
Boyles’ show and his agenda should be removed, as it is unproductive, promotes racial intolerance and has the potential of encouraging hate crimes toward minors. His comments regarding the basketball player set a poor example and demonstrate his lack of judgment and ethics. Any respectable individual can see that Boyles has crossed the line; and people of decency and humanity are distancing themselves from his narrow-minded agenda.

Norah Fisher, Grand Junction

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (112) | TrackBack

Massaro is stellar

A few months ago, Rocky writer Gary Massaro wrote an article about the life of my late mother, Mary Rita Marcinko.
His journalistic ability transcends mere talent.
I made copies of the article and sent them to relatives and friends across the country. I have been receiving much positive feedback from the recipients regarding Massaro’s engaging style.
In particular, everyone has been extremely impressed with the manner in which Massaro wove all the information together to create a true masterpiece.
Accolades! How fortunate the Rocky Mountain News is to have such a stellar professional on its staff!

Mary Michele Kane, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

You go, Chicks!

I almost married a chick from Texas twice (in different decades) and swore I’d never fall in love with one again.
Then, at Feb. 11’s Grammys, along came the Dixie Chicks themselves and, wouldn’t you know it, I’m right back where I started (“Dixie Chicks get last laugh for defiant disc”).
A warm, admiring and respectful congratulations to these “chicks” for winning album, record and song of the year. What a well-deserved slap in the face to all those radio stations across the country that so presumptuously removed them from their playlists. I bet some — no, a lot of them — are feeling pretty stupid and irrelevant now. Brava!

Grant D. Cyrus, Boulder

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (19) | TrackBack

Coverage lamented

I am completely disappointed in the manner which the Rocky Mountain News handled its coverage of the death of Patricia Wilkins-Wells (“Hypothermia was caused by acute alcohol intoxication,” Feb. 6). The article lacks consideration and respect and completely misinterprets the quotes from Katie Wilkins-Wells, her 16-year-old daughter.
Journalism is a field in which one is capable of reporting news, but it is necessary to report in a civil manner. The Rocky is found lacking in this area and should recognize the issue before it insults another grieving family.

Sarah McWhirt, Fort Collins

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

February 16, 2007
Golden Rule beats ‘diversity’ training every time

In regard to the diversity program and the language used at the Cherry Creek schools (“Diversity drivel,” On Point, Feb. 7): Why should we put up with the hateful nonsense set forth in this flawed attempt at diversity?
What is the goal of the diversity training in the Cherry Creek School District — to make the world even more divisive than we can currently tolerate? This type of teaching does not provide a kind understanding of our neighbors and classmates. I think Cherry Creek Schools would be ahead of the game if they focused on educational skills and ethics and less on defining what they think makes everyone so different from one another.
Personally, I am thankful for the parents who teach their kids the wisdom of the simple struggle to honor the Golden Rule: To love your neighbor as yourself. That covers a multitude of cultural misunderstandings and differences.

MaryGrace Barrick, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (29) | TrackBack

Polis a hypocrite

Jared Polis is a hypocrite. He’s against the notion of money being used to influence political decisions in Colorado — that is, unless it’s his (or maybe Pat Stryker’s) money (“GOP’s May says Polis ‘threatening’ in Amendment 41 talk,” Feb. 9). He’s all about improving the quality and accessibility of education in Colorado, but somehow missed the language in Amendment 41 that would prohibit some students from accepting merit scholarships.
Polis may have noble intentions. He may even be as clever as he thinks he is. And he’s indisputably rich. I hereby nominate him chairman of the Liberal Largess Party.

Vicky Green, Boulder

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Rosen’s implication

In his column of Feb. 2, “Is the boss overpaid?” Mike Rosen falsely implied that Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., wants CEO pay regulated by the government — a blatant distortion. In fact, it’s been Frank’s longstanding position that executive pay should be left to a corporation’s shareholders, not the government, to regulate.
Why wasn’t this fact — which, by the way, I found after a five-minute Google search — included in Rosen’s article? I forgot — Rosen is far too busy amusing himself with liberal-bashing to check his facts.

Mike Freed, Parker

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (63) | TrackBack

February 15, 2007
Democracy and freedom

President Bush needs to show America, Iraq and the world what democracy really means. It means freedom to admit your mistakes and change direction without being killed or banished.
Freedom for people not only to speak out, but to be listened to, to be heard and considered. Freedom to have a government that is open to the people’s voice, especially when it is a large majority; not led by a dictatorship. Freedom carries the responsibility for a prosperous and powerful country like ours to help people not through violence that has proven to create even more violence, not by driving millions of people from their country, and not at the cost of hundreds of thousands of lives, but through peaceful negotiations.
It is time to realize that might does not make right. It is time to take the high road, admit mistakes and set the course for success instead of failure. This would be a true example of what the values of democracy should mean to all of us.
Sharlene White, Colorado Springs

This letter has not been edited

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 PM | Comments (63) | TrackBack

Pro-union bill veto

The veto by Governor Ritter is probably the most intelligent decision he will make during his entire tenure as Governor of Colorado. The Pro-Union-Bill faction thought he was so new, and so easy to sway, that his approval was certain. That one veto will probably get him enough votes to be assured of a second term.
There is no doubt but that the union movement was a valid tool during the early nineteenth century, and forward, to fight child labor, and improve the lot of the average working public of that time. The actual need of organized labor has lessened as the years have rolled by as is evident in the fewer number of individuals involved now as compared with past years.
Businesses analyze costs versus revenue in planning for business success. A labor union involvement for a business is a serious cost factor that must be passed along to the ultimate consumer. Unions are profit making businesses themselves, and the ultimate consumer provides their income. Union efforts usually result in compensation increases for union worker members. Those increases,plus the amount of union dues, and all other related union administration costs, are passed along to the ultimate consumer. Obviously, as this equation shows, the Union Officials win, and the ultimate consumer loses. The union members themselves are middle ground because in the end they also pay more for the products they buy that tends to offset any compensation increases they might receive.
All ultimate consumers should be pleased that businesses, like Wal-Mart, have avoided union organization.
It has been said that unions protect the working population. That’s not all true. A well qualified worker,doing a good job, does not need the protection of a union.
A well qualified worker, doing a good job, is a valuable asset to a business, therefore those type workers provide their own protection. Unions protect the problem worker, one who usually provides questionable input,and possibly not dependable. This type worker, when justifiably fired, files a grievance with the union,against the business, and frequently wins the job back. An ideal working world would be one that all workers were happy, well qualified, and doing good jobs, and, in the process, being valuable assets for their given business. Union organizations would not be needed, and ultimate consumers would reap the rewards.
Possibly Governor Ritter was thinking along these lines when he vetoed the new Labor Organizational Bill.

Jack E. Watkins
Poncha Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

Are the elected officials that upset with voters for supporting Amendment 41 that they nitpick and try and take something simple by confusing the issue in hopes of getting it back on the ballot to get their perks?
State employees have some form of performance pay.
Students do not receive money in going to school 172 days a year but receive credits towards graduation as their reward. If their performance is outstanding, they may receive scholarships to continue their education as a reward for a job well done. This outstanding performance must be maintained or risk the loss of the scholarship. How can this be classified a gift? Maybe our State and Federal elected officials should be placed on performance pay as well, especially our Federal Representatives who spend more time fund raising to build up the re-election coffers than doing their job of solving problems in this country. Don’t be so petty in taking your frustration out on these deserving kids.

Dave Usechek
Northglenn

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:59 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Lafayette vote

Enough is enough. I had planned on quietly voting No on Issue A until I saw a few current and former Lafayette Open Space Advisory Committee members speaking out in favor of a potential Lowes annexation in Lafayette. As a trained wildlife biologist, a long-time environmental educator, and a 17-year resident of Lafayette, I have an opposing view.
Presently, there is only a very narrow piece of public land buffering Lafayette from Broomfield in this northeast section. Our open space inventory only increases when we religiously shop in Lafayette, and have the vision to realize what belongs where. The 32-acre parcel, in a larger context, lies amid four of the top five desired open space parcels, according to Lafayettes Open Space and Trails Master Plan. Wildlife can currently move from one of the desired open space areas through it to the others. It is my belief that a Lowes on this site would destroy the connectivity that it provides to wildlife, and its qualities as an urban buffer.
The Citys Comprehensive Plan is like a jigsaw puzzle: it is the placement of the pieces that is the trickiest part. This annexation land has been farmed for about a hundred years. The idea of a Lowes going in amid all of that is akin to someone working on a puzzle of a pastoral scene, and then opening up another puzzle from a busy shopping mall, taking out a very active looking piece, and smashing it into the center of the pastoral puzzle with a ball-peen hammer.
A Lowes store doesnt belong in an agricultural field off of a road that the Colorado Department Of Transportation would like to reroute. We have no business putting it there either. Vote No on Issue A.

Grant Swift
Lafayette

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:58 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Iraq war

It would appear that the Democrats are more concerned about ending the war in Iraq than winning it. Sen. Joe Lieberman characterized the proposed resolution against President Bush’s request for reinforcements as well as anyone, “it pledges support to the troops in the field but washes its hand of what they are doing.” Lieberman affirms what most of us already know, and that is that is the absurdity that the American people can support its troops, but not support its mission. Yet, the liberals will stop at nothing to attain their own ends, even if such actions are invested in our defeat. In so doing, they show us just who they really are.

Brian Stuckey
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:58 AM | Comments (52) | TrackBack

Climate change

Re: ‘A political climate/Not every expert agrees with global warming study’, Feb. 10, p. 26.
The contentions made by Ross McKitrick are mostly egregious and inflated.
For example, McKitrick’s reference to the “insolubility” of the Navier-Stokes’ equation over-inflates a the significance of a problem that has no over-arching bearing on the actual global warming we behold.
McKittrick also would know that Navier-Stokes also plays a key role in the fluid dynamics underpinning hurricanes, and yet hurricane forecasts are regularly made with 90% or better accuracy - and no one ignores them because the Navier -Stokes equation hasn’t been solved!
In terms of global warming we already have the data to support certain unimpeachable facts: - the last ten of 12 years have been the hottest since records have been kept - major sea ice melting, and ice shelf breakup is occurring in the Arctic and the Antarctic - Ice core samples taken globally disclose temperatures now warmer than even 400,000 yrs. ago As for McKittrick’s reference to solar influences and data, the best work ever done on this was by Sofia et al in their 1979 paper (Science, Vol. 204, page 1306). This showed a maximum variation of 0,1% in solar luminosity averaged over a typical solar cycle. This is insignificant in terms of the (listed) preceding warming effects.
More recent space-based observations appear to show a variation in solar irradiance of at least 0.15% over the standard 11-year solar cycle. (Nature, Vol. 399, p. 416). but even here the heating effect is nowhere near comparable to that induced from man-made global warming.
People also deserve to know that McKittrick is NO climate scientist, but an economist affiliated with the conservative Fraser Institute in Vancouver, B.C. His word should be the last we use to judge the merits of the IPCC report!

P.A. Stahl
Colorado Springs
Member, Solar Physics Division - American Astronomical Society

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:56 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Super Slab

SUPERSLAB CLOUDS PROPERTY TITLES
The cloud of eminent domain the Superslab casts over the Eastern Plains is no longer a figure of speech! It is a real encumbrance attached to the titles of the more than 6,500 parcels of land in the three-mile wide, 210-mile long tollroad corridor.
At the Colorado title insurance industries’ request, the Prairie Falcon Parkway Express Company, PTR, has recorded all Superslab corridor parcels with each of seven affected counties’ Clerk and Recorder Offices. This recording has created a complex financial and legal DISASTER of huge proportions!
A mortgage broker said he would not make a loan secured by property with this encumbrance. I hear of purchase closings collapsing when this notice is attached to titles. Realtors say that tollroad property is “unsaleable”.
Existing law lets a private tollroad company arbitrarily “nail” down a three-mile wide tollroad corridor onto defenseless landowners without “due process”. Actual construction can probably be avoided indefinitely. Thus, a tollroad company can “squat” on its claim in perpetuity.
This scenario is unfair to and disastrous for landowners within a private tollroad corridor.
Rep. Marsha Looper has drafted HB-07-1068 to remedy this property rights abuse.

Karen Shipper
Fondis

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:56 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

RF dangers

I have one question for the Mr. Golden mayor, You got up in front the JeffCo commissioners the other day and condemned the Lookout Mt Consolidation tower. You said you were extremely concerned about the effects of RF radiation and you used the analogy that it was similar to the dangers of a Nuclear bomb! But then, The you and City of Golden are about to install dozens or even hundreds of high-powered, RF emitting, medically controversial, Wi-Fi transmitters all over the city of Golden... and you want to do it, right in your own residents backyards!

Ernie Santella
Golden

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:55 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Bush administration

A letter to the American people and especially to the Democrats in Congress: History is filled with many examples of tyranny, and with many examples of tyrants’ downfalls at the hands of once-oppressed people wanting freedom and justice.
But what I can’t understand is why have not the American people and Congress in any meaningful way risen up against the Bush Adminstration’s use of torture and indefinite detention without proper trial, against the same Administration’s use of domestic spying, and, of course, against the waging of the illegal war in Iraq (and coming soon: in Iran)?
Because, in general, Americans may be as the German people during the Nazi era, they don’t want to see what is really going on.
Yes, there have been some moves by Congress to deal with the misuses of power by those in the Administration, but none of these moves have been significant.
To borrow a term: Americans now need a “surge” of moral leadership, of truth, of democratic values. We need more than just this “non-binding resolution” fluff, when it comes to opposing the Iraq war. Where are the questions, I wonder, that were promised would be asked?
Where are the crowds in the streets demanding America return to its once-charished values of democracy and human rights?
For it is time for each of us to take a stand, time for us each to demand America once again truly represent its own ideals.

Leroy Quet
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:55 AM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Snow, gangs, climate change

I think we’re missing an opportunity to use all this snow lying around to solve several problems.
First, round-up all the gang members and give them shovels. As we apparently know how many gang members there are around town, it should be easy to find them.
Have them shovel snow into piles for pick-up.
Then we take that snow and dump it on all the melting glaciers we’re being warned about.
This way we keep gang members busy doing constructive things and solve global warming at the same time.

Brian Olson
Highlands Ranch

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:54 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Ranchers

The Rocky story by Joe Garner with photos by Matt McClain about the plight of ranchers in southeast Colorado should be heeded. We should dig into the state coffers for them.
Who has it tougher, we city folks trying to work together, or ranchers who thrash around in snow up to their butts trying to save their cattle?
And, who are the lucky ones, us with our lights and sounds or them with their earth and sky?
No matter. The ranchers really need a hand this time. Really. They are tough. We’re all tough in this world. But, they have taken a serious, serious blow. A rare blow from a blizzard that remains frozen in place. With plenty of winter remaining.
The helicopters looked nice on television, giving us city dwellers a bit of solace that relief was on its way. But, new trouble brews always in this metropolis and hub to the world. It’s easy to think “thank goodness they got those ranchers help,” and go on. Unfortunately, the cattle need food the day after the helicopters are gone and the grazing is still buried in snow.
Meanwhile, the sound of animals breathing their last—livestock, coyotes, rabbits, all . . . is swept away by the ceaseless wind across the miles of prairie between us and them.
They are a proud lot. Fortunately, they live such tough lives that no one else will do it for them, as do we all. But, they don’t have time to march on Washington. They’ve got baby calves to feed. They don’t ask often. Let’s hear them, now, before they’re swept away, as well.

Dan Mundell
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:53 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Climate change

It’s now accepted as gospel by most atmospheric scientists, politicians, and media swells that human activities are the cause of global climate change. What’s sorely missing here is a sense of geologic perspective.
There’s not much doubt that earth’s climate is temporarily warming - there is geologic evidence that earth has warmed and cooled repeatedly, back and forth, for hundreds of millions of years. The multiple advances and retreats of glacial ice in the northern hemisphere are well known and accepted by nearly all. A relatively recent example of climate change was the Medieval Warm Period extending from about 900 A.D. to about 1350 A.D., when Greenland was warm enough to allow farming by Viking settlers. That warm period was followed by the so-called Little Ice Age extending until the late 1800s, a colder period from which earth’s climate even now is rebounding. There are many possible natural reasons for earth’s climate to change, among them variations in solar activity and orbital cycles, fluctuations in the release of thermal energy from inside the earth, and natural phenomena not yet understood.
Atmospheric scientists, along with the disciples of Al Gore who insist that human activities are the cause of global climate change, have an obligation to explain, ethically and honestly, why they now are so certain that humans are causing the global climate to change, when it is well established that earth has cooled and warmed many times before without any influence by humans.

Jim Muhm
Englewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:53 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

President Bush

How can “Shrub” (an honor to Molly Ivins) with a straight face suggest a budget with no cost for Iraq after 2009 when today Gates, his new Secretary of Defense, says today it will be several years before our military presence in Iraq will be over. I know tomorrow he will retract his statement. In addition, our “compassionate conservative” is recommending a 56% reduction in heating assistance to the poor. I guess that was in his former life maybe while he was under the influence of drugs.

Angelo Minuti
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:52 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Labor bill veto

Governor Ritter’s veto of HB 1072 sponsored by labor which would have made the process of organizing union shops easier not only was the politically correct thing to do but sent a strong message to a legislature controlled by his own party that they can’t take this Governor for granted and that the Governor is committed to an inclusive process and not a special interest agenda. Both sides foolishly threw themselves on the sword for HB 1072 that in reality affects few workers. The Governor understood that in order to fulfill the Colorado Promise of bringing adequate and affordable health care to workers that labor and business need to be at the table. His veto of HB 1072 should not be viewed as a victory or defeat for any side but as a message that the Governor believes that an inclusive process is the best policy in formulating legislation.

Carmi McLean
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:51 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Race & politics

I am totally confused about the “diversity” of some of the candidates you featured in the Feb 10 issue (Weekend Special: New Era in Politics). What confuses me is how Barack Obama is automatically considered black and how Bill Richardson is automatically considered Hispanic. While there is no doubt that Hillary is a woman and Mitt Romney is a Mormon, the “labeling” of the other two candidates underlines one of the great problems in this country...racism. Mr.
Obabma is, according to your article, half white and half black, so what makes him automatically black...his skin color? Isn’t that racism? And Mr. Richardson is the son of a Boston banker and a Mexican mother...doesn’t that make him half white, or half non-mexican? Why aren’t both of these men simply referred to as Americans? In fact, your quote from Mr. Richardson indicates that he thinks of himself as an American first.
My Great Grandmother was Cherokee, but I don’t consider myself an Indian-American, although I have deep respect for the heritage of my Cherokee ancestors. I consider myself an American. Period. The next Presidential election should not be one of choices between labels, but between qualifications. This country was founded on the idea that many would become one. We seem to be stuck in an attitude today that the best thing for this nation is to focus on all the differences among us instead of the things that unite us. It is time for racism to die in this country, and that starts with removing labels and hyphens.

Ken Maynard
Colorado Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:50 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Food safety

Now the government says that there will be no warnings labels on their meat that comes from cloned animals. In several years, people will be different from eating the cloned meat. We don’t know the results because there are not enough years that has passed in testing. The government always says that thing are OK then retract that statement later because of not enough time to test. I hope that I never get the cloned meat and find out later that it is bad for you.

Leroy M. Martinez
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:50 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Dixie Chicks

You CAN criticize the President and still sweep five Grammy awards without compromising your principles!
Maybe a few of our representatives could take a clue from the Dixie Chicks, regrow their cojones, and take Thomas Jefferson’s admonition to heart: “Dissent is the highest form of Patriotism.”
As for the rest of you who hounded Dixie Chicks off your know-nothing radio stations and whooped and hollared for CD-burning parties: In Your Face!

Pete Klammer
Wheat Ridge

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:49 AM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Racism

Congressman Tom Tancredo recently called Congress “hypocritical to extol the virtues of a color-blind society while sanctioning caucuses based on race.” That’s telling it like it is. For wanting, as Martin Luther King wanted, a “color free America,” for believing that “all men are created equal,” as our Declaration of Independence puts it, Tancredo can expect more criticism than praise from the media—not to mention from some petty politicians in Congress itself. Who’s playing racial politics (such as “sanctioning caucuses based on race"alone) to the detriment of American society? Congress is. And, sad to say, much of the media, not true Americans like Congressman Tancredo who renounce racial politics in the interest of all-repeat all—Americans. We desperately need to remember President Lincoln’s hope that “that government of the people, by the people, and for the people not perish from the earth” (Gettysburg Address).
In, recent decades, it seems to me, that our national government more closely resembles one “of the Congress, by the Congress, for the Congress,” not one of the people, you and me.
Charles L. King 2870 Duke Circle Boulder, CO 80305 303-499-7547

Posted by denver-admin at 11:48 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

The new Rocky

I just have one word for the new look of the paper: BORING! It looks like you fired your design team and asked a kindergarten class to come up with something new. Well, they did the best they could with basic colors and block letters. It is especially painful to look at MORE greys and blacks when that is all we have to look at outside, BAD TIMING! Enough is enough, I may not be able to look at your paper again until Spring and by then I hope you have chnaged your outlook. As always, I do like your content, but the packaging is so boring and basic now, I’m not sure I can hang in there.

Alyssa Honeycutt
Centennial
A reader for 22 years

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:48 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

The new Rocky

I now know why there is a purple line from the top to bottom on the pages, it so we can refold the paper so it is possible to read each page.

Bob Costello
Grand Lake

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:46 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

The new Rocky

Yuck! That is my reaction to the new print version of the Rocky Mountain News.
As a loyal reader of the paper, the new look of the paper is a turn-off. The paper now looks like the New York Post, or an equally sleazy drugstore tabloid. If cheap and sleazy is the look you want, your team nailed it.
Bring back the aesthetically pleasing Rocky or I will be forced to read your joint-venture partner, that fishwrap, liberal toilet paper, The Denver Post!

Rex Halbeisen
Westminster

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:41 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Iraq war

How can we possibly declare ‘victory’ in Iraq when no measurable goals or objectives have been set? How can ‘victory’ be defined?
Bring our troops home NOW! The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it. Through violence you may murder the liar, but you cannot murder the lie, nor establish the truth. Through violence you may murder the hater,but you do not murder hate.In fact, violence merely increases hate. So it goes. Returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness:only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that. —Martin Luther King

Kathy Glatz
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:41 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

I have a suggestion how to fix Amendment 41. Call a special election, repeal the darn thing, and start over. Since Mr. Polis is so intent on cleaning up government I think it would be nice if he paid for the election to correct his error and not soak the taxpayers.

Hurlburt Anderson
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:38 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

We’re paying now for loss of driver’s ed

As a former high school industrial education teacher trained as a driver’s education instructor, I could not agree more with Denny Dressman’s Speakout commentary of Jan. 28, “Upside down in a ditch? Here’s how it happens.”
Part of the problem is “schooling” that has passed for education in the decades since the mid- to late-’60s. This has created a dumbed-down populace lacking the ability to think and reason, along with lack of an academic foundation on which to base a modicum of thinking and reasoning.
Too many people, even with college degrees, believe that a four-wheel-drive vehicle is safe to drive on ice and compacted snow at normal, good-weather highway speeds. As a result, every snowfall results in the highways littered with upended 4WD vehicles.
A 4WD vehicle is fine for plowing through deep snow if necessary to get out before the plows clear the roads. But on rutty and packed snow, 4WD vehicles have all the grace and agility of a cow walking on ice.
I think that a good share of the problem was the dismantling by the legislature of the formal driver’s education programs in the schools. It assumed that parents understood proper driving procedures, but that is a fallacy. And now they will pass on poor driving habits through successive generations.

Richard Becker, Broomfield

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Livestock take back seat to money

With almost 15,000 head of cattle dead and dying from the horrible snowstorms in southern Colorado, the government (with hearty approval of Democratic Gov. Bill Ritter) is rolling out money for farmers. The morality of it all is appalling. Farmers are offered money from the taxpayers because the government gets interest on their loans and holds farmers under its financial wing for years thereafter, taking their farms if they can’t pay.
While cattle ranchers are in business for profit, I can’t imagine our well-meaning ranchers not caring for their cattle to the very bone.
While Ritter and the feds think about money, what about the poor animals freezing and starving? Oh, there may be a few token bales of hay dropped for the media to photograph, but the main focus is on money.
Are Colorado’s cattle just products for slaughter and a means for the government to profit at the expense of humane treatment of animals? If the government cares at all, it should care for the safety of the animals first, then reimbursement to farmers if the livestock dies. But it’s the other way around. Is this just a look ahead to what the Democrats have as their main emphasis when it comes to Coloradans?

Linda Nelson, Boulder

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

They’ve got a funny way of pushing peace

Recently, in Washington, D.C., the anti-war protesters were yelling that the Iraq war was another Vietnam War. In a least one way they were right.
A disabled veteran, who lost a leg in Iraq, was also there. He was part of a counterdemonstration supporting the troops in Iraq and advocating victory in Iraq over the terrorists. When the two groups converged, they exchanged their “chants.” One of the disabled soldier’s buddies yelled to the anti-war protesters that they had the right to protest because people like the Iraq war vet had fought to preserve that right. The anti-war protesters response? They spat on the vet!
Sadly, things haven’t changed much.
The anti-war protesters also vandalized the Fox News satellite relay truck, smashing the windshield and doing other damage.
The anti-war protesters claim they want peace. So violence (assaulting a disabled vet) and destroying property is how they express that?

Ernest M. Duckworth Jr., Sedalia

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (24) | TrackBack

None of our business

President Bush continues to state that for our military to leave Iraq “would be devastating to the United States.” This is just another untruthful and misleading statement.
Since 9/11, spending on homeland security and surveillance of terrorist countries have very significantly increased. If there were terrorists in Iraq that were a threat to our country and the other countries that have been attacked by terrorists, why wouldn’t those other countries be there fighting with us?
This extremely expensive conflict in blood and treasure is just none of our business.

Robert W. Steller, Larkspur

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Allard’s disgrace

Sen. Wayne Allard’s vote with the GOP recently to bar a vote on the Iraq war resolution was disgraceful. The American people are demanding an end to the war, but Allard and the rest won’t even allow the Senate to vote on the matter.
The Iraq war will go down in history as one of our great nation’s most tragic debacles, and George W. Bush will go down as our worst president. By siding with Bush to prevent this vote, Allard has demonstrated he deserves to be considered complicit in Bush’s Folly.

William Hambric, Broomfield

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (26) | TrackBack

Upping wager limit has drawbacks

Mike Rosen thinks that due to inflation, Colorado casinos should increase the $5 betting limit (“Time to up the ante,” Jan. 25).
He claims that, “In a few more years, you might as well be playing for matchsticks.” Really, Mike? At $5 a spin on the $1 slot machines, you can lose $1,000 very easily in an hour. With the slot machines generating more than 90 percent of the casinos’ revenue, why would they want to raise the limit? Very few people can afford to play $5 slot machines at $25 a spin.
If the betting limit is increased, then the blackjack card-counting syndicates would come out of the woodwork and wreak havoc on the casinos. The only way raising the maximum wager would make sense would be if more games (like craps and roulette) were allowed.
However, this would require such a substantial increase that it will never happen.

Jay Lillien, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Qwest-ionable assertion

In its editorial of Feb. 1, “End cable monopolies,” the Rocky says that the fact that Qwest gets hundreds of millions of dollars in government subsidies “has nothing to do with” the issue of whether Qwest should be allowed preferential treatment if it offers cable TV.
Why doesn’t it?
Qwest used these massive government handouts to build up its network — the same network it says it will upgrade to offer video service. And then Qwest has the nerve to say that, despite this government-subsidized network across the state, it can’t offer video service to all residents.

Dara Collins, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Wisdom of Solomon

San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom should have listened to Solomon, who wrote years ago, “Can a man scoop fire into his lap without his clothes being burned? Can a man walk on hot coals without his feet being scorched? So is he who sleeps with another man’s wife; no one who touches her will go unpunished” (Proverbs 6:27-29).
Solomon did not follow his own advice and his kingdom was split and eventually the people were sent into exile.

Jay Moyers, Centennial

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

No grounds for suit

So now we have a mother, whose son died after being Tasered by the police, intending to sue the city of Lafayette for $22 million (“Mother plans to sue,” Briefing, Feb. 5). The son was breaking the law, so what grounds are there for the lawsuit?
While I was growing up, my understanding — from my parents — was if a cop says to stop, you stop! Time for the judge to throw this out of court and threaten the mother with a lawsuit for her son breaking the law.

Joseph G. Martinez, Brighton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Snow is natural

I just had to respond to all the letters from people trying to blame someone, anyone, for the back-to-back blizzards that brought our state to a standstill. You can’t blame anyone — it’s an act of nature! Get over it!
There’s an old saying: If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.
I have a new one: If you can’t handle the snow, get out of Colorado!

Sue Mercer, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

A Differing View: No teen legislators

In its recent editorial “Let the young serve” (Jan. 31), the Rocky said, “Yes, some 18-year-olds are uninformed and immature, but others have taken on adult responsibilities and carry them out faithfully and well. The antics of the first group aren’t grounds for limiting the opportunities of those in the second group.”
I agree. However, that is exactly the reason that was given to prevent 18-year-olds from drinking.
If they can’t make reasonable decisions about drinking, they should not be voting either. If they are not capable of making decisions about drinking, they should not be in the legislature.

W.T. Cathey is a resident of Boulder.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

February 14, 2007
English language

First amendment or Stupidity: There’s a story coming out of Philadelphia about Geno’s Steak House ( Philly Steak Cheeses ) putting two signs in there window one saying, This is America - when ordering, speak English. the other, Management reserves the right to refuse service. Why not a third sign saying I’ve got enough money, I don’t need yours? The owners name is Joey Vento, sounds like there’s an Ellis Island tie there. Joey is also quoted as saying he doesn’t see how a sign in English can offend if you don’t speak it. Nice logic, maybe he should talk to his grandparents or someone else old enough from Italy and find out what they went through when they first came over to this country not knowing the language. His theory is it’s his First Amendment right to put up signs in his window stating his point of view. And newspapers attacking him only put out issues in English so they should back off and quit being hypocrites. I guess he’s got arguably points, but at this point in time in any restaurant I would think you would or should have two menus, one English one Spanish. Even though no one comes out saying what the language is he’s refusing how much you want to bet it’s Spanish since that’s the hot topic nation wide. You could say a lot about allot about the immigration issue but I would think that if you ran a restaurant especially if you sold Philly Steak Cheeses in these health consciences times you would put up as many signs in as many languages as you could to sell your sandwich. Unless of course you have enough money and you don’t need any from people that don’t speak English. Just a thought.

Rob Weber
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:04 PM | Comments (22) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

I cannot believe that just because a student who has worked hard and applied theirself to earn a scholarship or grant for which many of them have had to apply, will be denied their goals due to Amendment 41. Their parents did not earn the scholarship or grant, the student worked to achieve them.
There is concern in this state about keeping unemployment and welfare rolls at a minimum. What do you think would happen if the parents decided in order to let their child be eligible for an award or scholarship, the parent(s) just quit working or resigned their state office. What about the dropout numbers in our schools? No incentive for a student if one or both parents work a local, city or state job.
This situation needs to be resolved now, before it is too late!
Does this affect me? Not directly, but I saw a Channel 4 News story regarding Kelly Granado on 2/5/07 possibly losing her scholarship. I read about the Richard Marvin’s daughter the previous day. It is not right these girls or any student lose their rights to something they have earned because of Amendment 41!!!

Marie Worley
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:03 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Climate change

Where’s the balance in the global warming debate? All that’s reported is the litany of disasters that might happen, never any of the benefits. If you’re thinking ‘What benefits?’, then my point is made. Just a few that would be felt locally are reduced snow removal costs, less pothole and road repair costs, and fewer shutdowns and disruptions due to blizzards.
Plants and animals flourish in hot regions as opposed to cold, just think of the diversity of life in the Amazon compared to that in Antarctica. How do we know that change would be bad, and that mankind and the earth wouldn’t be vastly better off if the temperature was 1-2 degrees warmer, or even 20 degrees warmer for that matter?

Keith Wagner
Commerce City

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:03 PM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Climate change

The Science is in on Global Warming
On Friday the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released an updated assessment of the science behind climate change. More than 2,500 scientists from 130 countries participate in the drafting and review of these reports. Their report concludes that the world’s climate is growing warmer at a rapid and alarming rate and that there is a greater than 90% chance that human activity, particularly the burning of fossil fuels, is responsible.
While some look at the present winter in Colorado and ask: “what global warming?”, we must look at the entire planet. Yes, it has been bitterly cold in Colorado, but much of the Northeastern U.S and Europe have been exceptionally warm until the past several weeks. More significantly, as the IPCC reported, all but one of 12 hottest years ever recorded have occurred in the past eleven years. Additionally, more intense storms (snow, rain, tornados, hurricanes, etc) as well as more intense drought are hallmarks of global warming.
We can avoid the worst impacts of the global warming if we immediately reduce consumption of fossil fuels, both by conservation and by moving toward renewable energy sources, If one considers the legacy we leave to our children and grandchildren, it is morally and ethically required that all of us immediately work toward solving this problem.
Additionally, this could be a win, win for Colorado. With our 300 sunny days/year, we are ideally situated to become a market and manufacturing leader in the photovoltaic industry. This would certainly be preferable to the destruction of fossil fuel extraction, which further exacerbates the climate crisis.

Jerry D. Unruh, Ph.D. in chemistry
Manitou Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:02 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Electoral College

I would agree that the Electoral College is an essential part of the election process and should certainly be retained. It appears that Sen. Ken Gordon is more concerned about the Democrats winning in 2008 than preserving the Electoral College. We hope that the Governor will see this deceitful ploy for what it is. In essence, SB 46 is merely a selfish scheme designed to give the liberal Democrats an edge over the Republicans, and nothing more. Our forefathers had the sagacity to predict such an outcome and the Electoral College is the result.

Brian Stuckey
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:01 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

War

war is not the answer. war is not the answer. war is not the answer. it never has been. never will be. maybe we need to change our question to, “how do we resolve our differences with integrity; acknowledging that no one country, no one individual has the answer, rather we discover the answer together?”

David L. Stevenson
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:00 PM | Comments (26) | TrackBack

Climate change

Recently on Turner Classic Movies I watched an old 1970’s Dick Cavett interview of Katherine Hepburn. Now Katherine Hepburn is one of my all-time favorite actresses, but she had the same disease many of today’s superstar entertainers have; an inability to keep from talking about things they know nothing about. At the end of this delightful interview Ms. Hepburn decided to inform everyone of the imminent disaster to be caused by population growth. She confidently asserted there was a population bomb ticking in the world, and warned that everyone should immediately begin practicing something called ‘zero population growth’ or the consequences would be very dire indeed.
Why is this relevant, now? Because people with the very same mindset and the very same lack of hard evidence to back up their assertions have whipped up a similar frenzy in today’s world that I refer to as the ‘Global Warming Hysteria.’ Anyone truly interested in learning the facts of global climate patterns will quickly discover that global temperatures do not remain static (imagine that), and that humans have a negligible, at best, effect on them.
Instead of being a dire threat to humanity, ‘global warming’ is only the latest in a long, long line of leftist scares (think DDT, Alar, SUV’s, pollution, corporations, Republicans and Capitalism to name but a very few) that ultimately have one basic purpose; to tear down the incredible improvement in the quality of living caused by the introduction of freedom into the lives of ordinary men with the founding of America. The real question is not whether ‘global warming’ is a threat, but why a substantial portion of the population continually dreams up ways to prevent other people from being free and enjoying their lives.
For the same reason a population bomb didn’t destroy our lives in the last thirty years, global warming won’t harm us in the next thirty. Indeed, the only harm that will ever come from ‘global warming’ is the harm that would come from the prescribed ‘remedy.’ Oh and one more thing you ought to know about leftist scares of the ‘70’s; the climate problem they were awful worried about back then was ‘global cooling.’

Russell W. Shurts
Centennial

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:59 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Online gaming

Who do our politicians think they are? They can pass laws without ever letting the people of this nation know. Congress passed a law against online gaming and it went into effect on Jan. 16. I am a handicapped 56-year-old woman who has nothing to do except play online most of my days (not necessarily for money, but just play). Now I can’t even do that! And if I wanted to play for real money I can’t get funded anywhere online.
I thought this was America and it was supposed to be the land of the free. Ha! When someone else can get into my bank accounts, take money out of my husband’s check (just to finance another immigrant) and close me down completely online, how free am I really?
I thought this nation was built on justice and freedom for all. Why can’t some do something about this?

Elizabeth K. Sewald
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:58 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Israel & Palestinians

People sometimes wonder why there is no peace in the Israel/Palestinian conflict. The Jews have recently decided to dig at a spot in Jerusalem adjacent to a site that Palestinians hold as a holy site—as do Jews.The reason for this digging, which some say could harm the foundations of the Dome of the Rock, is to dig up artifacts. This hasto be as stupid as themove of the previous Israeli prime minister a few years ago to enter a Palestinian holy site, when he knew full well it would do nothing but create more conflict. It is true that the Palestinianscarry ona lot of terrorist actsin thearea, but it is also true that the Israelis, with theirceaseless building of illegal settlements and such acts as the one above, along with theircontinuous andoverbearingcheck points and other impediments to Palestinians going to and from work are just asbad as the terrorist acts. So, when will the area stop fighting, allow the Palestinians to have a homeland—as the Jews were already long since given? It won’t happen until both sides stop their childish acts and begin to act like adults who are willing to work together for a lasting peace for all. America should have been vigorously pursuing this goal for the past six years, instead of venturing off on a poorly conceived and planned invasion of Iraq. Had they done that, the area would now be much further along toward middle east peace. Just one more among the many failures and wrong moves by the Bush people.

John Ruckman
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:57 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

War on terror

I am the only one?
It was a little ironic that page 37 of the news on Feb.1st, had quite the contrast in capabilities of fighting terror. Britain corrupts and intercepts a plot that saved lives, The police in Boston stop an ad campaign from the Cartoon Network. Glad to see our tax dollars are going to good use in the fight against terrorists.

Dan Pula
Brighton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:56 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Homosexuality

Given the attention that homosexuality issues have recently been receiving in the region (gay marriage, the Colorado Springs pastor), it is time to critically explore the often used excuse that homosexuals cannot help but carry out their desired sexual behavior. That is an argument that society does not apply readily to socially undesirable behaviors, and should not be accepted for homosexuality.
There are numerous socially undesirable traits and tendencies possessed by people which they cannot simply shut off. And yet civilized society, rightly so, expects these affected persons to quell those desires and not act out according to their urges. A good example is methamphetamine use, or use of any of numerous addictive drugs. It is believed by many in the neuroscience and drug treatment disciplines that some people are born with inherited traits that predispose them to addictions. There is also scientific evidence that abuse of certain drugs leads to actual physiologic changes in the brain which perpetuate the addictive behavior. And yet we as a society expect those persons to overcome those tendencies and either not become drug addicts in the first place, or break free of the addictions once present. And to the best of my interpretation society by and large does not excuse meth or heroin abuse if it occurs in the privacy of one’s home.
What about pedophiles? I have heard it said by experts who study this behavior that pedophiles cannot necessarily extinguish their desires. The fear of repeated offenses is the main reason for sex offender registries. However society demands that these people not act on their desires, and rightly so.
In less dramatic fashion, the same could be said for heterosexual men who struggle with lust over numerous women. It is socially unacceptable for such men to act on their desires and force themselves on women. The driving force behind this socially unacceptable behavior is the same sexual physiologic and emotional response (e.g. the effect hormones and thoughts have on the body) that is argued to be the reason homosexuals cannot control their sexual attractions.
So the argument that homosexuality should be accepted because gays and lesbians are born that way is extremely weak and should not be accepted as reasonable, any more than it would be accepted for drug addicts, sex offenders, or overly aggressive heterosexual males. I am not necessarily equating homosexuality with drug abuse and pedophilia. However the issue is whether or not society deems homosexual behavior socially and morally acceptable, regardless of the presence of innate desires.
And the debate of what is socially acceptable should be able to occur without those promoting the gay lifestyle trying to intimidate and suppress those who find it unacceptable. It seems the favored debate style of gay proponents is to simply label those who find the gay lifestyle socially and morally unacceptable as haters, bigots, and uncaring. However, are people who believe drug abuse, pedophilia, and even polygamy are socially unacceptable labeled as haters and bigots? No, and I am quite certain many gay proponents share those beliefs.

D.T. Murphy
Cheyenne, Wyo.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:55 PM | Comments (17) | TrackBack

Labor bill veto

The veto of HB 1072 that would eliminate a super majority vote requirement for union members to decide to have all that benefit from a union contract help pay to enforce it, AND the excuse Governor Bill Ritter used are pathetic. He supports the intent of the bill but vetoed it because it was not properly debated? No debate is needed to see that this bill is fair and just.· This issue at the workplace is the only government vote that requires 75% approval. What if Bill Ritter needed 75% to be governor?· The Chamber of Commerce had hundreds of lobbyist out in force claiming workers deserve a secret ballot vote on the subject. This is the same group that always claims government should not interfere with business.· The reality is that the current law gives business two bites at the apple to prevent a workers’ union from having a little more power. We should not forget that workers cannot obligate all to pay unless the employer agrees.· I am a union member and I have never seen a contract negotiated without a secret ballot ratification vote. There is already a second election. This bill just eliminates an unfair third election. While this bill would help workers gain just a little bit in the struggle for a fair deal, it is mostly symbolic. The only way to fix the incredible imbalance of wealth in this country is to overhaul federal labor laws by passing the Employee Free Choice Act. In the longest period of growth in our country where most companies are making record profits and the DOW is finding a new high regularly, workers are not sharing in the wealth. More and more workers are losing their Healthcare benefits & pensions, and wages are not keeping up. When is the media going to recognize the imbalance of wealth is directly related to the percentage of workers with a union? Working people game out in record numbers to donate a few dollars, make phone calls and knock on doors to get this governor elected and he had a chance to begin to move our country towards a better distribution of wealth and power but did not because there was not enough debate in a forum where the working people have almost no voice * the legislature. I doubt the pompous, elitist, arrogant excuse our governor used to turn his back of the working class of Colorado is not real. More likely, Ritter is addicted to the corporate dollars flowing his way. Hats of to our legislature for having the backbone to do the right thing, but, I hope we, the working class who got this governor elected sees now that we cannot depend on anyone else. We must unite, stand up and demand justice.

Kevin Mulligan
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:54 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

The new Rocky

At my age, I have enough problems; I don’t need serious eye strain added to the list. As my wife noted, the size of your new fonts jump all over the place, making the reading of many of your articles a much more difficult and jarring experience. Many of your new fonts were too small, not what a primarily older readership needs or deserves.
My wife also thinks that the new Spotlight, which used to be her favorite part of the newspaper, now looks like something out of People magazine, which isn’t a compliment.
Finally, tell columnist Mike Littwin that, because of him (“Where’s Littwin? Way back here on News 38,” Jan. 23), I will be humming that Paul Simon song for the next three weeks.

Robert H. Moulton III
Commerce City

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:54 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

The new Rocky

I wanted to let you know that the size of the new paper is fine - anything to make it easier to read is great.
However, you have cut a lot out of the weather page which disappoints me greatly.
I appreciated and used the weather forcast. I looked at cities that you have removed the temperatures for. I also miss knowing what the temp was the previous day as we all know that the forecast is not always correct. Please put the weather page back the way it was - useful!

Pam Meskel
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:53 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Through much prayer and fasting…let me explain this in terms that even I can understand…The Honorable George W. Bush did find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and it’s all wrapped up in a fancy Christmas box that we have all come to love and appreciate and that is “radical Muslim terrorism.” Since 911 a steady stream or thread of Muslim terrorists are being fed into Iraq to fight the Christian conservative freedom fighting Americans. Yes we can bring the troops home, fold our hands, make some really good “anti-terrorist” movies and wait patiently for ournation to be attacked…and then all look at each other with our mouths dropped and gasp and say, “Willy, whah happened?” Democrats live in denial about the Muslim agenda and they live in denial about how many Muslins are lined up to fight. So having said all that…let’s bring the troops home and move the war to Hollywood. Jane Fonda and Tim Robbins can set up a booth with anti war protest fliers and negotiate with the Muslim terrorists. And that’s because in Sean Penn/Tim Robbins world and in Susan Serandan’s/Jane Fonda’s world-there are no Muslim terrorists…no worries mate. It’s just a happy go lucky zippety do dah let’s go shopping on Rodeo drive kinda day.
And on the way stop and pick up Nancy Pelosi for a new suit at Armani’s. We wanna look really cool when they get here. Because radical Muslim terrorists are open minded reasonable terrorists.

Sally McGirk
Thornton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:52 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Iran

Justifications for aggression against the Iranian state appear daily in the mass media, and the United States will soon have three aircraft carrier strike groups in the Persian Gulf. These and other pieces of circumstantial evidence suggest that the Bush administration, alone or in collaboration with Israel, is preparing to attack Iran. According to knowledgeable sources such an attack could involve bombing 1500 different sites, using tactical nuclear weapons to destroy Iran’s buried nuclear facilities, and killing over two million Iranian citizens.
Usually I consider the policies of George Bush to be despicable but not really crazy. However, an attack upon Iran, or even a threat to attack, would be sheer lunacy. Iran has about 70 million people. While it lacks the military capacity to retaliate against the United States directly, it can prodigiously accelerate the tempo of violence in Iraq and the casualty rate among American soldiers. An attack upon Iran would render the entire middle eastern region from the Himalayas to the Mediterranean severely unstable for a generation or more. Israeli participation in such an attack would convince the over 300 million Arab, Persian, Punjab, and Pashtun people that accommodation with the Zionist state is completely impossible.
An attack upon Iran could unhinge the global political and economic system in many different ways. It would probably have profound and lasting effects upon the supply and price of middle eastern oil. It could touch off a new nuclear arms race by persuading small countries that operational nuclear weapons are the only reliable safeguard against American aggression. And for great powers like China, India, Russia, Germany, and Japan an attack upon Iran would demonstrate that the United States is truly an out of control rogue state whose imperial arrogance threatens everyone.
I rarely agree with American military leaders, yet I fully endorse the statements made on January 18 by retired general Barry McCaffrey in testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. General McCaffrey called the Bush administrations public threats against Iran “sheer insanity” and said that military action against Iran would be “the most significant blunder in strategic thinking...since World War II.”

Tom Mayer
Boulder
Department of Sociology, University of Colorado at Boulder

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:51 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Junk mail

Now the State Capitol lawmakers will consider a bill aimed at putting and end to unwanted junk mail. I say to little to late. What wrong, did one of the people at the state capitol get too much junk mail and decided to do something about it. I still to little to late.

Leroy M. Martinez
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:50 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Police shooting

I need more information about Mr. Bonner who was shot by police in Aurora. According to news reports, Mr. Bonner, the son, was selling crack cocaine to an undercover officer, breaking the law. Apparently he was shot in a hotel room by the police during a sting operation and he was unarmed, again according to the news reports. Unfortunately he died from being shot, but he was breaking the law. Why did they pay the family $610,000 and get an apology from the Police. Mr. Bonner, the father, says that his son has sent a message, and what would that be, OK to sell crack cocaine. No money should paid nor apology issued.

Joseph G. Martinez
Brighton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:49 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Nursing

The subject is nursing crisis. As an OR.NO. I have left the profession since moving here from California due to the intolerable attitude of the hospitals and their management in this state. Nurses are not respected, overworked and underpaid. No labor law in this state only compounds this problem. The attitude is literally, if you don't like it, there is the door! I did not spend 10 years in school to be treated like this. How dare they! I offered sound and compassionate nursing care to my patients, but always fought the battle of who needed me less. There are only so many things one can do in a shift, and if the load is 125% this means someone is going to get left. Hospitals need to wake up! I'm afraid greed, power, and corruption of thought is at the core of the thinking. If I saw the law being broken over things that should not occur, or if it was a hostile work environment, who can I go to. It's discussing. Colorado ought to be ashamed! Sound labor law protecting the employees from capricious managers, and in the field of healthcare, nurse/patient ratios needs to occur. Truthfully, I'm sorry I moved here. Colorado needs to come into the 21st century.

Anonymous
Colorado Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:48 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Nursing

I was a bedside nurse at VA Hospital. I could tell you many stories about how staffing affects quality of patient care as well as how it drives nurses away from the bedside. Two weeks ago I couldn’t take it anymore and left the bedside, the shift work, the overtime hours and the thankless hospital administrators for a M-F desk job 8-4:30. Maybe you have already heard that there is no nursing shortage in Colorado. There is a shortage of nurses who won’t do bedside nursing.
The best way for you to find out what nurses are up against is to be a patient in a hospital for a week. Then try to tell me staffing doesn’t affect the quality of your care. Problem is you might not even notice when a wrong medication was given to you or that you never did get the ordered medication at the right time and the right dose. If you believe hospitals treat nurses well ask a few why they left the bedside. If you believe hospitals have troube making money, why is it that Colorado hospitals are the most profitable in the country. It sure isn’t because the nurses are well paid and the hospitals overstaffed. Good journalism requires you to hear both sides of the story.

Kay Kiser
No hometown listed

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:46 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Climate change

In regard to global warming (GW), we should consider these points too:
A. In the 1970’s the talk was global cooling, not global warming.
B. We just had in Denver the coldest January in 28 years.
C. Because of GW, we were told, the 2006 hurricane season was going to be very active; but no hurricane hit the US.
D. The sea level could raise 23 inches!!! That happens every day between high and low tide in most places. A two feet rise would not even flood Miami or New York City.
E. Climate has always changed and humans had nothing to do with it. During the dinosaurs it was much warmer; 20,000 years ago it was an ice age.
F. What are the benefits of GW? We never hear about them. According to some, the benefits are going to be much higher than the costs.
G. Are the people who talk about GW really impartial? Or do they have something to gain from it, such as more money for research?
H. If there is GW, is trying to prevent it (by lowering CO2 emissions), the best way to deal with it? Or wouldn’t it be much better, and cheaper, trying to adapt to it?

Boris Illade
Westminster

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:45 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

President Bush

What is it with the Republican party in Washington these days?? For a brief moment Americans hoped for a reasonable end to the war in Iraq, hope given to us by our Congress after Bush’s proposal to add 21,500 more troops to Iraq. The President presenting words about promoting alternative forms of energy in the State of the Union speech. Then what happens? The Republicans voted to BLOCK the debate on the war in Iraq, and the President in his budget proposal cuts funding for alternative energy, increases funding for fossil fuels and further digging up our environment. He says he acknowledges (finally) that global warming exists, yet perhaps he’s deciding that our children would be better able to deal with the problem.
Money talks- and this is what it said: Mr. Bush’s budget proposal proves what is really important to him. He was only trying to impress us at the State of the Union speech. Salvage some of the public opinion. These people need to learn to walk the talk. It seems less and less like our elected official in the White House wants to act like an elected official. I hope our “Mr.
Decider” decides that perhaps he should listen to the folks he’s supposed to represent.

Joanie Hendricks
Littleton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:44 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Legislative plea

I have written my own Senators and Rep - One of my Senators and my Rep (Speaker Pelosi - can you prod her or something???) are apparently brain frozen. - Please no more symbology - bind Bush and his administration for good - Get us out of Iraq and the rest of the world in (UN, NATO, etc.) - let Iraq purchase what it needs to end its own civil war. We need to clean up America... NOW!! Save PBS and NPR permanently please. Train our children and grand children to be able to defend themselves properly - give them the equipment they need - NO MORE TROOPS to Iraq - we want them home, alive and repairable. STOP sparking an arms race with Iran and Korea or anyone else. Protect SS and Medicare recipients. Stop the hassling and make the changes!!!! NO WAR IN IRAN!!!
This is what I just sent my Congress persons: As your constituent, I strongly urge you to become a co-sponsor of the “Effective Terrorists Prosecution Act,” a bill being introduced by Senator Dodd to fix the problems with the Military Commissions Act. Another option is totally repeal it as unConstitutional. Impeach/Indict- Convict - Imprison Bush and his entire Administration.

Collea-Devi Goetz
Fort Collins

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:43 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Ted Haggard

Hallelujah and praise the lord!!!!! Ted Haggard is once again 100% heterosexual! We knew it could be done! And all gay people are also 100% heterosexual, because, as Rev. Tim Ralph said, “It was the acting-out situation where things took place.”
We have seen the light and heard the word. This is all it took for these experts on human sexuality to set the world straight again.

Joe Felice
No hometown listed

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:42 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Ted Haggard

I was alarmed at the rate tickets vanished to Dave Chappelle’s ComedyWorks performance this week. My dejection was suddenly interrupted by Wednesday’s Rocky Mountain News, courtesy of Colorado Springs Reverend Tim Ralph, who reports Ted Haggard is now “completely heterosexual.” Who needs Dave (no offense, Dave) when I have Colorado’s finest evangelical leadership consistently serving as a reliable source of entertainment? Ted Haggard is no more heterosexual than I am Miss America. (At least Miss America can beat the bottle in rehab - there is no rehab to recover from one’s truth.) I can’t decide what’s more humorous: the notion one can be “rehabilitated” from their sexuality, or Haggard’s “acting out” being labeled “immoral,” or perhaps the panel of “counselors” who surround him believing the “gay” can be “prayed away.”
I guess “de Nile” is not only a river in Egypt, and it runs rampant and wildly through Colorado Springs.
Tickets to Dave Chappelle: priced at $45. Ted Haggard’s claim of “heterosexual": priceless.

Jeff Bangert
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:41 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Labor bill veto

As the grandaughter of an old-time union organizer, I always lean union.
Nevertheless I am thrilled to have a governor who looks at the big picture and is committed to representing all the people. To disappoint good friends and supporters, especially in a matter one personally supports, is terribly difficult for all of us. That Ritter could do this gives me hope that we may have a period of well-thought-out laws instead of constant scrambling to repair “unintended consequences.” It also seems possible that even when I hold an opinion that differs from that of the folks in power, my side will be seriously considered. What the heck is this, a democracy?

Willa Allen
Westminster

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:40 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Dislike Amendment 41? Too bad

Jared Polis and Common Cause just don’t get it. People voted for Amendment 41 because of loose interpretations of laws. It is terrible and unfortunate some of the results of the way this constitutional amendment was worded, but it is now law. This law is part of our constitution, and not subject to easy amendment. So when Common Cause’s Jenny Flanagan says the amendment is being too strictly interpreted, well, sorry.
It’s the constitution. And in retrospect, it’s a terrible one, badly devised. Bad results. But not subject to revision by the legislature. Get over it, and know you messed up.
Keep in mind that’s why so many people voted on it in the first place — because pols have twisted and turned and wiggled out of past laws. So thanks for our state politicians who are refusing to wiggle out of this problem forced on them.

Scott Strohmeier, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Irony at the Capitol

Ironic, isn’t it. On the one hand, you have state legislators refusing to fix Amendment 41, because they are afraid to “go against the will of the voters.” On the other hand, you have state legislators pushing through Senate Bill 46, designed to circumvent the Electoral College, after “the will of the voters” was clearly expressed by the rejection of a similar bill in 2004. The irony does not escape me, anyway.

John N. Hansen, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Bush’s tax proposal hurts small business

President Bush’s proposal to tax health insurance should be identified for what it is: a tax on small- and medium-size businesses and their employees. The health plans with the richest “gold” are usually large employers (such as the federal government) which can command steep discounts in the insurance market based on their total premium dollars.
Small businesses pay a fortune for insurance, if they can get it, and for modest or stripped-down coverage. So the bulk of people paying taxes will not be well-heeled executives — they will be employees for small businesses scrimping to pay high monthly premiums — and now also paying tax on a portion of that cost.

Dan Fishbein, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

February 13, 2007
Dog abuser

This is to the uncaring awful person/persons who dumped their Rottweiler out of a car on about 120th Avenue and Tower Road. You must not have a conscience about animals let alone people.
It just so happens that someone witnessed you doing this; not only could you have caused a horrible accident by someone avoiding hitting the dog; I might add people that actually have a conscience unlike you go out of their way to avoid hitting a dog. I happen to live closeby and saw the poor animal last week in the sub zero weather wandering around; it took me 2 hours to finally lure the dog into my house; a safe place and then I had the heartbreaking task of calling animal control. Not that you are interested but the dog is now at Adams County Animal Shelter. I am so glad that most people are not like you!!!!!
Carol Leech
Commerce City

Posted by denver-admin at 11:46 AM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

Amendment 41 is an excellent example of the possible dangers of good intentions gone bad. Keep Big Money from influencing elected officials? Wonderful idea, but the execution leaves much to be desired. Due to the vagaries of the amendment’s language, hundreds if not thousands of hard-working, deserving teens are now ineligible for scholarships and grants to continue their education. Most of the government-employed parents are not pulling in the big bucks, and few have any influence in policy matters.
If ever there were a need for drastic measures, this is it. Immediate action must be taken to undo the damage caused by this flawed amendment. “It takes less time to do a thing right than it does to explain why you did it wrong” (Longfellow). Jared Polis and Common Cause must suck it up, admit their good intentions went awry, and fund an immediate special election to repeal the cause of this debacle. We could have the one-question mail-in ballot distributed directly, to be returned by the beginning of April. With any luck, the scholarship and awards committees would be able to delay finalizing any decisions until after the election. I have a vested interest in all this. It is ludicrous to think my musically talented 16-year-old son might not be eligible for a scholarship to a prestigious music school when he graduates simply because, when it snows, his father pulls himself out of bed at 3:00am to clear off the county roads. Now there’s a terrific way to thank our public servants for their hard work.
What a mess. We should not have even considered cluttering up our Constitution with this frivolous amendment. It should be covered by a state statute. If there is any good to come out of all this, it may be that future voters will read ballot proposals in depth, and truly understand their implications and consequences. We will then avoid repeating this fiasco in a future election.

Marguerite King
Paonia

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:45 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Seat belts

Re: “Seat-Belt crackdown sought”, Feb. 02, 2007.
After reading and hearing about this article that appeared in the Rocky Mountain News we felt it necessary to respond to the accusations that were reiterated. Rep. Carroll was quoted as having said that making the seat-belt law a primary violation would open the door to “police harassment” and that the police now have to “fake racial profiling”.
It is our hope that Rep. Carroll’s position has changed and that she has been able to look at the issue from a position of common sense. If this is how she truly feels about the hard working men and women who put their own personal safety secondary to those they serve and protect then this is a slap in the face of every one who serves in law enforcement. It sounds as if Rep. Carroll wants the law enforcement community to just roll out the red carpet for criminals to the homes of the honest people who live in Colorado because she does not trust the police. Have police officers been accused of abusing their authority? Yes and those few have been dealt with and any abuses in the future will be dealt with. Do not paint the men and women in law enforcement with a broad brush of suspicion because of a few.
Rep. Carroll has apparently forgotten that behind this proposed legislation is the true desire to save lives. Over the last few years the “Click it or Ticket” campaign has shown that direct enforcement of seat-belt laws has reduced the number of injury or death related traffic collisions. One thing that many seem to forget when they look at this legislation is the cost of automobile insurance. When hard working families are trying to get more out of their hard earned dollar we need to remember that when injuries occur in these collisions this costs all of us more. The cost of emergency health care goes up; the ability for those injured to work goes down. Wear your seat-belt and safe yourself and your family in the long run.
If we were to go by Rep. Carroll’s theory then why do we allow the police officers to enforce any traffic violation on the possibility that their rights will be violated? We believe that the citizens and their elected representatives want us to enforce the laws that are not only important enough to put on the books, but also save lives.

David Hoover
Lakewood
President, Lakewood Police Union Local 303, International Union of Police Associations, AFL-CIO

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:45 AM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Vincent Carroll & Jared Polis

I wonder if Vincent Carroll realizes just how much he resembles Jared Polis. Both of them take great umbrage at anyone who disagrees with THEIR Pontifical Pronouncements concerning what “is, was, and should be". And both excoriate the critic, rather than even beginning to consider the validity and truth of the criticism.
The current matter of “Diversity Training” certainly has many faults, failings, and problems. But Carroll sounds off as if his were the only proper approach to attempting to structure a complex educational program - although his credentials as an educator are, at best, minimal, if at all existant that is. And in reality, the abomination called “Amendment 41” is beyond the ability of Executive, Legislative, or Judicial act to remedy. And Polis sounds off as if he were not to blame in any way for the current and future problems facing the families of those working for government in any capacity - blaming “Lobbyists” for “creating fear", when he himself is not only a Lobbyist as such, but also the originator of the whole sorry mess.
I guess the new Rocky Munchkin News - as one writer has so aptly described it - has decided to save both paper and space, by way of printing whatever be available where ever it might wind up on the layout boards. But after all, who really takes the Rocky for anything other than its comic pages in the first place?

Colin J. Guthrie, Ph.D.
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:44 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

The new Rocky

Great job on the new format of the Rocky. We really like it. Could still use some help in the comics section75 percent of them are really lame.
Speaking of comics, thanks for moving Bill (Whites Against Blacks) Johnson, Tina (Poor, Poor Mexicans) Griego and Mike (No Clue) Littwin to the back where they belong. I would have put them in with the obituary section.
If only we could have Saturday and Sunday back like it was, it would be a beautiful thing.

Darin Garrett
Highlands Ranch

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:43 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Columbus Day

I would like to thank Senator Suzanne Williams for showing the leadership in the State Senate that is necessary to make our state a better place. What does it say about us as a state and a country that we honor a person who is guilty of slave trading, both of Africans and Indian people, and who is guilty of a genocide of 7.5 million people in the first 8 years that he was in this part of the world? It is absolutely absurd that this bill is not unanimously passed. To continue to honor Christopher Columbus with a holiday is a travesty of justice and speaks to the way that violence and domination is tolerated, and sometimes promoted, by the majority culture. We should have eliminated this holiday a long time ago, and we have a responsibility to do it now. 100 years is far too long to celebrate genocide.

Mark Freeland
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:39 AM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

The new Rocky

About three months ago, I mailed in $152 to renew my yearly subscription to the Rocky Mountain News. Had I known then what I know now, I would not have sent in my check. I do have a question, however: Can you suggest a good magnifying-glass store in the metro area so I can read the new print size?

Bill Fountain
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:38 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Evolution & faith

Why do some people who obviously do not believe in God, the Bible, and the Word of God as being the literal truth given to us by a literal God infest our churches by becoming pastors? If they want to make up their own religion, let them do so. Why do they feel it is their “calling” to infest various Christian churches with their doubts as to the truth of God as found in his Word as recorded in the Bible?
Jean Torkelson’s column, “Church makes evolutionary change over time” (Rocky Mountain News, Monday, Feb. 12, 2006), makes it clear that there are certain pastors who spend their time not only questioning the truth as found in the Bible, but ridiculing those who actually do believe the Bible is the truth.
Why are they pastors? Why are they pastors in Christian denominations? Why do they waste their time and our time trying to undermine Christianity with their lies when it would be much more honest of them to simply start their own church wherein the Bible they don’t believe in the first place is no where to be found? They can write their own book, start their own religion and see how many people buy into their lies and deceits.
But that’s the point, isn’t it? Pastors who believe in evolution simply aren’t honest. They are not honest to God; they aren’t honest to their congregation. So they “sneak” their way into a leadership position in a supposedly Christian church where, over time, they undermine the truth of God and the Bible with their own lies and deceits — just as the truthful Bible says would happen.
Here’s a clue: What would we EXPECT to find IF there was a world-wide flood just as the Bible in Genesis claims there was? Maybe BILLIONS of buried dead things all over the world? And is that not EXACTLY what is found? Do we not find billions of buried dead things all over the world?
Atheistic evolutionists interpret the “evidence” of billions of buried dead things their way, while those of us who actually believe the Bible as being the truth can look at that same evidence and point to the most logical explanation — something that “evolutionary pastors” won’t do since they have already assumed that atheistic evolutionists are “right” and the Bible is “wrong.”
And that brings me back to my original question: Why are “evolutionary pastors” even in a leadership position in a Christian church when they hold Darwin’s “The Origin of Mankind” as being more truthful than the Holy Bible? Are they so incredibly dishonest that they can’t even start their own religion — they have to “sneak” their lies and deceits into a Christian church on Sunday mornings?

Robert E. Forman
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:37 AM | Comments (64) | TrackBack

Ethics in government

Jared Polis doesn’t get it. He believes that he invented “Clean government,” in Colorado. He and his colleagues decided, with no substantial evidence, that elected state house and senate politicians were corrupt because lobbyists bought them lunch and a single Compaq PDA. Now, Mr. Polis says,""If he’s trying to make my name synonymous with clean government, that’s certainly a cross that I can bear.” (Rocky Mountain News, January 7, 2007) Since these elected politicians can no longer get a free lunch - is Mr. Polis now going to pay for all of the food and expenses that these part-time state employees can’t afford? No.
Isn’t it great to see a multi-millionaire tell people of modest means what they don’t need? Like Douglas Bruce before him, he is the consummate outsider who moves to Colorado and then creates a government nightmare for his adopted home.
Does he now claim that our state’s Attorney General, John Suthers, is a lobbyist and that this is why he has said that public employees kids can’t accept scholarships - or that academics at CU-Boulder can’t accept a Nobel Prize (Rocky Mountain News, December 29, 2006)? Now, academics have another reason not to work at CU-Boulder.
The truth is that Mr. Polis and his colleagues made serious mistakes. Mr.
Polis, you owe the citizens of Colorado an apology. Get over yourself and roll-up your sleeves.

Ben Fiedler
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:37 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Pit bulls

Is the Rocky on the same Pit Bull reign of terror as DDA Cory Nelson? Seems like Rocky might be participating in some biased reporting!
In Denver alone since the ill imposed Pit ban, over 800 dogs have been confiscated and murdered. Commerce City, Denver and Aurora, in spite of State Law banning breed specific legislation, came in under home rule “we need to protect our cities from these vicious animals” and banned the dogs. Pets were taken from their homes and killed. Commerce City Sheriff bragged to CIty Council every time a Pit was confiscated and killed “one more down!” My question to you the citizens is “How long are we going to allow this to occur?”
Here is my vicious Pit, thank gosh we live somewhere where people have enough brains to have vicious dog ordinances. I imagine her living a long, happy life after having survived being gashed herself, surviving days without medical care only to be taken to the vet and still refused care. Her former owner then took her home and was going to have a neighbor put a bullet in her head. Animal control was able to take possession of her and spent 9 hours stitching her up. After extensive recovery and painful treatment for heartworm, she is the best lapdog in my house. Here is a picture of her in a bikini. She loves to be my Barbie! Isn’t she wonderful?

Billie Farrell
Broomfield

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:36 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Drunken drivers

I read with interest the new tougher DUI laws being proposed.Just a few months ago the RMN reported that Denver and other jurisdictions had a catch and release policy for people stopped for DUI.The policy was not to arrest them but give them a ticket and if the could call someone sober to drive them home they were let go.There were no finger prints or photos taken.Most didn’t show for court.Some claimed it wasn’t them driving.The police couldn’t prove it 100%.I never did read a response from the Police Dept. or the Mayor’s office on the RMN story.Was it just ignored or did I miss a response from the city?
Now the city want’s to crack down on drunk driver’s because of the horrible tragedy of the family that was run down by a drunk driver.Why does it take a horrible tragedy to enforce the laws against drunk driver’s in the first place?How many hit and runs in the past have been because of driver’s being drunk?There seems to be a hit and run every week.How many drunk driver’s did the police catch and release?The police by letting these drunk driver’s off with a ticket sent a message to them ,that DUI is not a big deal in Denver.So how many continued to drive drunk on other occasions.We will never know that answer.
Now Denver want’s to make drunk driving laws tougher.How are they going to enforce the tougher laws when they wouldn’t even enforce the laws already on the books?

Tracey L. Fanning
Thornton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:35 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Smoking

I have been a smoker for over 30 years, when I started it was the “cool” thing to do, but of course you could advertise cigarettes and booze in all the media. I have heard and still listen to all the “talk” concerning second hand smoke. I hear of all of these reports that exist but never seen by the general public concerning the effects of second hand smoke. I would be more willing to believe this if the Surgeon General of the United States would come out with a formal statement of fact concerning the subject of second hand smoke. On every package of cigarette’s there is some type of warning endorsed by the Surgeon General. My information and knowledge (limited as it may be) tells me this is this man’s or offices job, to officially warn the public of health risks to the american public based on fact not heresay and fiction. Most scientictic studies are based upon long studies as 20 to 30 years of study, but unfortuneatly there are no such studies out there. It is obvious to me that the US Government does not have proof that second hand smoke just from cigarettes cause cancer. I have seen nothing on car pollution, or diesel smoke or industrial smoke, or rain forest smoke, or any of the other many many types of smoke out there.
This just happens to be the convienant choice of some goody two shoes because they don’t like it or is a “far worse” complainer the dreaded “reformed smoker". Last but not least, if this is such a dreaded contributor to cancer, I suggest we make this LEGAL product illegal. SAVE US ALL!!! I could live with a total ban of cigarettes and the smoke associated with it, but to handpick the many ways to remove our legal rights is not why our grandparents and great grandparents came to this country. It was because of the many rights afforded us by the Constitution and its Amendments and the Bill of Rights, which have brought us all here. I want the non-smokers of the United States to know that I really appreciate there concern for my health and the health of all the people around me which they have never met. Just do it legally, go through the process and take this harmful product out of the access of the general public by making this “cigarette madness” illegal, then you won’t have to worry about taking our rights away one by one.

Galen Erickson
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:34 AM | Comments (53) | TrackBack

Health insurance

State insurance mandates are a popular bogeyman to those who look to the market to miraculously cure our ailing health care system, but their ire is misplaced. These mandates add only a few percent to the cost of a health care policy and provide us all with the assurance that when we buy a policy, we get what we think we are getting. Mandates require insurance to cover basic services like emergency care, hospice services, childbirth, well-child visits, vaccinations and mammograms. It is disingenous to imply that these regulations require insurers to cover things like accupuncture and other complementary services. Blaming mandates for the high cost of health care is simply recognizing that health insurance that doesn’t cover anything wouldn’t cost very much.
But who wants insurance that doesn’t cover anything?
The author (Sally Pipes) asserts that the problem with mandates is that they force us all to pay for things we don’t use - yet that is the fundamental function of insurance. No one buys health insurance hoping for cancer. When we buy a policy, we all hope we are paying for things we will not use, yet we all want reassurance that we will have coverage for the services we need if and when we need them.
Articles such as Sunday’s editorial are ridiculous distractions. What we need now is an honest and far-reaching conversation about how every American can have affordable, timely access to the essential health care we all would want under the same circumstances and the moral and political courage to make it happen.

Mark Earnest MD
Denver
Vice-President - The Colorado Coalition for the Medically Underserved

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:33 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Climate change

Response to “Global warming can only be a good thing” letter from Bill Gernannt, Denver, published Tuesday February 6th, 2007.
This kind of talk gives our species a bad name. The author of this opinion letter is of a very special and unique group that would look at an issue like human papillomavirus and the risk of cervical cancer it presents to all women and probably say, ‘there’s no evidence that human papillomavirus is causing cancer, it could actually be not enough pesticides in her diet; besides this phenomenon is a good thing, because the world is a better place without so many women.’ To that author I say this, “there is no looking on the bright side of global warming.” People like this author and of that same mindset make me seriously step back and wonder, “wait, if people are so stupid and blatantly ignorant, shouldn’t we be deathly afraid of human effects on the environment and the evidence strongly suggesting that we are destroying that environment?!?” And further, all these diehard Republicans, Conservatives, and old-school Bureaucrats need to take a hint from George W (Google search ‘Bush admits humans cause global warming’) who just recently asked we reduce gas use by twenty percent nationally. If the crown-prince of anti-environment, who nixed Kyoto, is starting to worry about this problem, then all his mindless cohorts should follow suit and simply admit that global warming is a bad thing. It’s much greener on our environment friendly side of the fence, and I will be happy to hand you all the tools to succeed, live life normally, and even make money (gasp, that’s right) in an environmentally-friendly world.

Sean Doherty
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:33 AM | Comments (41) | TrackBack

The Rocky

At one time the city of Denver had two excellent newspapers, the “Post” and the “News.” The Post rushed into liberalism and became totally unreliable by relying on the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times for its content, as well as bending left on practically every issue regardless of facts.
The descent of the News, now called “the Rocky,” was slower, occurring in bits and pieces. National and international news were hidden inside toward the back of the paper, replaced on the front page by sports and numerous freak shows. The obituaries were placed at the end of the business section. The listing of stocks was pared to only show the most widely held stocks. The weather page was split between the front and the back of the paper. Some of the comic strips that were “funny pages” were replaced with strips of political diatribe or inane “humor” that is often inappropriate and sometimes bizarre.
Letters to the Editor and Editorial Page Editor Vincent Carroll are a couple of saving graces of the Rocky. Holding out against the nitwit-onslaught of buffoons like Mike Littwin and Ed Stein, who are allowed and encouraged to run rampant over logic and journalistic professionalism, Carroll manages to provide clarity and editorial excellence. Of course, the Rocky will probably decide to split Carroll’s columns into paragraphs sprinkled throughout the paper to make them incomprehensible.
Although it is usually not good form to speak ill of the deceased, let it be said that the loss of columnist Molly Ivins was no great loss to the Rocky. We all go sooner or later, and, thankfully, Molly has gone.
Speaking of gone, although it is important to remember the past, the bus-train wreck that the Rocky has enshrined in endless pages was gone long ago. Aren’t there enough ambulance-chasing, fire-tragedy, auto-wreck, murder-mayhem stories happening everyday that the Rocky doesn’t have to dredge up past horrific events. News should be hot, not warmed-over sentiment that happened years before.
One major difference between the bus-train-wreck series and the death-of-a-Marine series was relevance of the Marine story to the present. Handled empathetically and poignantly, the Marine story soared beyond anything the Rocky has done in recent years. Maybe there is enough journalistic savvy left under the facade of the Rocky’s new building to restore the excellence the paper once had.

John Dellinger
Lakewood

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:31 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

The new Rocky

As an avid Rocky Mountain News reader for over 30 years, I can’t tell you how disappointed I was to see the paper arrive in the miniaturized size. The majority of the print is way too small, even for someone who only needs weak eyeglasses to read fine print. In fact, I’ve had to use a magnifying glass, along with my eyeglasses to just get through each day’s paper.
Whose idea was it to change to this format and print sizes? A 20-something “kid” out of college? Please, remember that most of your loyal readers are those baby boomers (like myself) and beyond. Please don’t ask us to “go online” for more info that your paper didn’t have room to print. That is a big hassle. Many of us are not fully “computer literate,” and it takes extra time to get on the computer (which many people don’t have to spare).
I pay the newspaper to provide most of my daily news, and not the Web site, TV, radio, etc. The worst part of reading the Rocky this week was the lack of information on the weather page. It left out a lot of information about cities around the world and in the United States. Then it was split it up into two different locations in the paper. After reading The Sunday Denver Post it was such a refreshing difference. I may change newspapers, not because I like the Post’s longer pages and features better, but due to their larger print and full coverage of the news.

Amy Croissant
Brighton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:30 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

The new Rocky

Thanks for shrinking the reporting of weather in U.S. cities, Rocky. One more feature has bitten the dust. Very soon the paper will consist of a headline and 50 pages of ads. If the paper is reduced in size again, perhaps it would be good to give a magnifying glass with each subscription. The only real reason to subscribe is to get the cents-off coupons. The obituary reporting is large, but then again, each entry requires a payment.

George Couchman
Littleton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:29 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Nursing

RE: “Nurses split on staffing measure", 2/2/07 article And “From bad to worse” 2/6/07 editorial.
Washington missed the shortage issue completely in her article but the editorial has some problems too. The “mountain of administrative paperwork” the RMN editorial writer is concerned about: the hospitals already record and keep. They might have to spiff them up a bit, but the info is readily available.
The News thinks that patient outcomes that are currently publicly reported are sufficient, while the staffing levels are too difficult for prospective patients to understand. I know the newspapers insist on dumbing down the news, but my 30 years in nursing has not given me the impression people can’t understand this kind of report.
Particularly if the newspapers would do some decent reporting on the problems and contributing factors. The combination of patient outcomes and staffing ratios can be more accurate than just one or the other.
Yes, educating faculty and nurses are the true solutions ( including better pay for faculty especially). In the meantime, the staffing ratios would curb the hospitals’ tendency to ignore low staffing situations and maintain surgery schedules and other admissions that strain patient care to unsafe levels. It is hard for them to forego payments for the surgical suites, cath labs, etc. just because they are short ‘a few nurses’.
Would you rather wait another week for that surgery or take the chance on increased risks of complications?

Virginia Cotts RN BSN
Wheat Ridge

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:29 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Unions

I would like to take a moment to thank Gov. Bill Ritter for having a the insight to veto the Pro-Union bill. It is not that I am anti union, but after reading through the bill I came away with a sense that a Union Hall could basically decide to “unionize” a company and there would be nothing that employees or employers could do about it, which is very wrong. There is no reason to eliminate the second vote to unionize, it gives everyone the chance to decide if a company should be union or not. It seems that the initial vote of only ten members of a company to open the doors for talks about a union should not be the binding agreement for everyone who is involved with that particular company. It also seems to me that this bill was fast tracked through the system right after the DNC said it would not sign the Stagehand unions agreement, so this bill pops up and allows the union to force itself on the workers at the Pepsi Center. If you will remember, the union had the labor for McNichols Arena, but when the new building was erected they were not hired, hmmmm I wonder why?
True Pepsi Center is a privately owned building, but they had the opportunity to hire on the Union, but choose not to, could it be that the Union rules about things like plugging in an extension cord or changing a light bulb, which according to them are specialist positions and required a trained technician to do those tasks, are totally ridiculous and drive costs even higher. If a company whishes to be union, more power to them and congratulations, but don’t assume that everyone is interested in being union and they should have the opportunity to decide for themselves. Unions should never have the right to force themselves on any company ever, period. This also works both ways, companies should not be able to keep unions out, if and only if the workers decide they want a union and have the opportunity to vote whether or not they want to become Union.

Massimo Cerasoli
Edgewater
House audio tech for Pepsi Center

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:28 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Evolution & faith

The article by Linda Seebach on Sat. Feb. 10, “Reaching out to Christians on evolution,” clearly shows that the author has confused the issues of whether evolution is regarded as science with the issue of whether Christians can hold evolutionary views consistent with Biblical doctrine.
She correctly notes that the number of scientists challenging Darwinian theory is steadily growing, but claims that they have “lost” the race to the overwhelming numbers of clergy who have signed an open letter claiming evolution is compatible with Christianity. All 10,000 of those signers would not offset a single challenger among the credentialed scientists who recognize that evolution is a failed theory, devoid of any empirical basis, because the supporters of “Evolution Sunday” are members of the apostate church who are not of scientific standing. Further, the idea that a godless process of random/chance mutations could produce the wonders of Creation we observe in the universe is at its core atheistic materialism, and contrary to the Biblical view of origins, which forms the basis for all Christian doctrine. Any philosophy that attempts to extricate Creation from true history destroys Christianity at its heart: “In the Beginning there was the Word [CHRIST], . . . and the Word was God, and all things were made by Him.” (John 1:1)

Bill Browning
Centennial
Rocky Mountain Creation Fellowship

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:27 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Hillary Clinton

Clinton’s Turnaround on Iraq is Preposterous
It is extremely disingenuous for Senator Hilary Clinton to say If she knew then what she knows now she would not have voted to authorize President Bush to invade Iraq. There were ample indications at the time that the evidence Bush presented was incomplete and not accurate. Senator Clinton, and her colleagues failed miserably to do their job, when they chose not to question or investigate Bush’s assertions. They are as responsible as the Bush administration for our current predicament in Iraq.
To now claim their actions were because they were fooled does not reflect the reality of the time, or show real leadership or integrity. There were a large number of people who did not trust the information being presented as a slam dunk. That is why the U.N. put weapons inspectors in Iraq to confirm Bush administration claims. Bush demanded the withdrawal of those inspectors before they could verify his claims, which we now know were false. That is why the U.N. would not sanction the U.S. invasion. Over 100 house members voted against the invasion, and Scott Ritter the foremost expert on the Iraqi weapons program openly challenged Bush claims.
Clinton also said “when she becomes President she will end the war in Iraq”. There is no reason to wait. Congress, not the president has the power of waging war. Congress can bring the troops home now if they choose. If Hilary Clinton were serious about ending our unsanctioned occupation of Iraq she would be working on a binding resolution to bring our troops home now, not later.

Mark Benner
Anton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:26 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Urban renewal

I am a native of Denver and of Colorado. I attended Park Hill, Smiley, and East, and graduated from the University of Colorado. I remember when Larimer Street had old saloons on it with 60 foot long mirrors behind the bar counters. I remember the Tabor Theatre and Opera House. I remember the old downtown, which development destroyed, foolishly destroyed, taking away—forever!—the character of old Denver. Only Larimer Square remains. It was all foolish. Now, when visiting cities that have preserved their old characters, I envy them their foresight. Travelling in Europe and in other cities that have kept their history and their charm is small compensation for the destruction of the history and charm of the city I live in.
Please preserve the DeBoer district! Don’t allow the same old, same old development to take place. Don’t let the generic-looking development destroy the trees, the old houses, the distinctive Tudor-style house on Iliff, the integrated character of the place with its hundreds of trees and bushes... People can live here. Single families enjoy living here with yards and trees and the small-town feel of the place. Instead, the developers come in with their ideas to aggolmerate, agglutinate, conglomerate, and concentrate families into a little stack with the “quintessence of condo.” If there must be development, at least force the developers to preserve the natural beauty of the place. It takes a hundred years to grow those cottonwoods, but really there is no way to keep the total atmosphere of the place if developers come in and tear apart sections of the neighborhood.
Thank you for listening.

Robert C. Bayers
Centennial

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:26 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Don’t blame market for health-care woes

That our current system of health care is less than perfect is beyond question. However, Rocky columnist Paul Campos’ assertion that it is “as clear an example of market failure as one could hope to find” is patently false (“Our sickly health care,” Jan. 30).
To put it simply, where the government is, the free market is not.
In his own article, Campos goes to lengths to dispel the common myth that “health care is provided by the market, rather than by the government.”
Stop picking on the market! Why not call it an institutional failure or a people failure? The mere fact that doctors have to be licensed to work in this country (not that there’s anything wrong with that) is proof that market forces are not the sole determinants of outcomes in American health-care markets.
Finally, please do allow Campos to explain away differences between international longevity and infant mortality rates as functions of a single variable — the quality of national health care. Unless he is controlling for other variables, that might affect these outcomes (e.g. institutional, lifestyle, dietary, etc.), Campos is misusing statistical information to construct inferences that are thoroughly misleading and false.

Katherine Konopka, Englewood

Posted by denver-admin at 10:36 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Half-right about wealth, disparity

In his Jan. 23 column, “Soul-crippling wealth,” Paul Campos quotes the Gospel of Mark: “How hard it is for the rich to enter the Kingdom of God!”
But how did the rich of that era acquire their wealth? Was it through entrepreneurial skill, using resources efficiently to deliver highly desired products and services to the masses? No; there wasn’t much of a free market. The rich were the politicos of their day — lords, kings, princes, holders of state monopolies. Their wealth was the result of expropriation, violence, coercion, conquest. There is nothing soul-crippling about earning wealth by improving the condition of society through voluntary exchange.
Campos is correct about the rising income disparity and its bad effect on the soul, but he does not note its source: our growing corporatist big-business state, in which favored established companies use the state to suppress competition and stick their hands into the pockets of the less well-connected through taxation. The military-industrial complex and the myriad “security” firms are only the most obvious examples.

Ben Tucker, Lone Tree

Posted by denver-admin at 10:36 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Law-abiding gun owners targeted

Shame on Rep. Al White for introducing a bill (House Bill 1174) that would treat honest, law-abiding holders of concealed handgun permits the same as criminals by placing their names and personal information in a statewide law enforcement database (“New bills,” Jan. 25).
Despite restrictions in the current law which granted sheriffs temporary, limited authority to share information with other law enforcement agencies to verify validity of permits only, numerous abuses of this information by law enforcement have occurred.
Now White is asking for a totally unrestricted, unprotected statewide database of law-abiding citizens for no practical purpose other than to compile a list of Colorado gun owners. How can White credibly claim to be acting to protect his original bill, which has been an unqualified success for nearly four years, when he seeks to discourage concealed-carry permit applicants with de facto gun registration?

David Gill,
Sedalia
Vice-president,
Colorado State
Shooting Association

Posted by denver-admin at 10:35 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Whiny Americans

I am so tired of hearing Americans whine!
Mexicans are taking our jobs. Boo-hoo-hoo.
Mexicans are lowering our wages. Boo-hoo-hoo.
We have to wait behind Mexicans to get our food stamps. Boo-hoo-hoo.
Why are you still in the same labor pool as immigrant Mexicans? Get off your duffs, whiners. Get off drugs and booze. Get your GED and get an education! This is America, remember? The land of opportunity! And ... stop your whining!

C. Trujillo, Lakewood

Posted by denver-admin at 10:34 AM | Comments (34) | TrackBack

Glad Bush embracing new energy future

I would like to comment on President Bush’s approach toward America’s “confrontation of the challenges of global climate change” during his recent State of the Union address.
As a high school student living in Denver, I am one of a growing number of people concerned with the haze of pollution draped over the Rocky Mountains and am grateful that our nation is at last resolving to progress toward a new energy future on behalf of coming generations. A 20 percent reduction in gasoline consumption in the next century and a diversification of energy supply, especially considering past positive market response, is not only reasonable, but something we as a society should pursue in earnest.
Our country has achieved ambitious goals in the past, so I am optimistic for the health of our environment, so long as the public remains aware and bent upon keeping our legislators on track.

Kristian Cowden, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 10:34 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Give peace a chance

In his State of the Union address, the “decider-in-chief” asked for American citizens to give his escalation of war a chance.
Why won’t the “decider-in- chief” consider giving peace a chance?
War is death, destruction, conflict, suffering, pain, chaos, anger, hate, fear, waste and hell. War is what a country will declare on an enemy when it has been attacked or terrorized.
Peace is friendliness, calm, order, security, cooperation, diplomacy, love, trust, honesty, concern for all children, and helping others so they can help themselves.
Iraq had nothing to do with the terrorist attack on 9/11. The war should be in Afghanistan where Osama bin Laden and his terrorists are hanging out and preparing for more terrorist activities.

Leon Rodriguez, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 10:33 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Pitch in, Mr. Carroll

Regarding Vincent Carroll’s On Point item of Jan. 31, “Suffer the children,” I’m confused: Exactly how many children fathered by other men is Carroll currently paying child support for? If the answer is none, I am sure we can find some who could use his help. Step up to the plate, Mr. Carroll, or stop advocating a financial death sentence for men who can prove their nonpaternity.

James Hoople, Westminster

Posted by denver-admin at 10:32 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Snow removal ideas for Denver’s mayor

I’m not a constituent of Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper, but I do have some suggestions for him regarding snow removal.
1. We haven’t had a December blizzard in about 25 years. They are not to be treated like the spring and fall storms that are much more prevalent, i.e., don’t count on solar power to melt it. Expect hard freezes — it’s wintertime!
2. When the storm has passed, get every available frontloader and dump truck, municipal and private, out on the streets 24 hours a day, loading the snow and dumping it into the river. Plowing huge drifts of snow onto sidewalks and driveways doesn’t cut it.
3. Since sidewalks are then not buried by snowplows, feel justified in fining everyone who doesn’t shovel their walk, which should help offset the major expense of snow removal on the streets. Pedestrians have rights, too!

Jim Bernath, Englewood

Posted by denver-admin at 10:31 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

February 12, 2007
Democrats

So, it turns out that the 2-year-old computer system for administering welfare benefits in Colorado doesn’t work, and Democratic state lawmakers can’t wait to assign the blame to the already-exited Owens administration (Hearing eyes benefits woes,” Jan. 18).
One would think this is the first automated system in Colorado that didn’t work as advertised. (Can we say “DIA baggage system?) While the legislature ultimately controls the budget, and surely had something to do with this fiasco, to be fair it should be acknowledged that if the Owens administration undertook this project and it doesn’t work, they should shoulder most of the blame, right up to January of 2007. Now it remains to be seen if Bill Ritter’s crew can do much better, and how much more it costs the state to do it.
Bear just one thing in mind while Democrats howl over the inefficiency and cost overruns associated with this bureaucratic nightmare: These are the same folks who want government to be in charge of running your health care.

Michael Trimble
Littleton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:14 PM | Comments (14) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

After reading Bill Harrison’s Jan. 16 letter, “Let voters change 41,” I had to respond.
I’m sure that Amendment 41 was formed with good intentionsobviously, to stop government employees from accepting bribes and gifts in exchange for political favors. The problem is that many people were most likely not aware of everything Amendment 41 entailed.
As it currently stands, this amendment prevents me from buying my father gifts worth more than $50 in an entire year, since he works for the Colorado Department of Transportation. I am a high school senior getting ready to go to college, and I have been offered scholarships to several universities based on my own merit, yet Amendment 41 prevents me from accepting these scholarships since they are “gifts” that would indirectly benefit my father. I know I am not the only person in this situation; Amendment 41 affects everyone from the governor of Colorado all the way to the people who plow our streets.
Tell me, is the new legislature changing the wording of Amendment 41 because they don’t like it, or because they are smart enough recognize its problems? It is my belief that if the voters of Colorado, including possibly Harrison, had taken the time to read about Amendment 41 and become informed voters, the glaring issues of this amendment would have become clear and it would never have passed.
Colorado cannot wait another two years for the voters to change Amendment 41. It needs to be changed now.

Kristen Brenner
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:13 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

As a registered voter, I am so tired of seeing negative articles about Amendment 41 in the newspaper. Every day this week so far there have been articles complaining about all the things wrong with the amendment. The amendment was put on the ballot and the people voted to pass it. Everybody should accept that it was passed. This amendment along with the smoking ban are receiving a lot of negative press. I feel that when the voters have spoken that should be the end of it.

Marge Billinger
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:12 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Organic foods

Organic food production has, once again, been defined incorrectly (Green never tasted so good,” Spotlight, Jan. 20). It is not “pesticide-, hormone-, antibiotic- and genetically modified-free,” nor has the Department of Agriculture, which regulates the organics program, ever claim these things to be true.
Background research is important for journalists. With a quick Google search on organic law (or a longer visit to the actual legislation), the Rocky would have learned that organic food can and does use pesticides, hormones and antibiotics, as well as fertilizers, herbicides, traps and live bacteria and other microorganisms. Under the Organic Act of 1990 and subsequent legislation, organic producers may use all these things, provided they either are derived from a “nonsynthetic” (plant, animal or mineral) source, or that they are on the official list of approved synthetic chemicals.
For the consumer, and for the environment, organically produced food still can be toxic. As a farmer who has to correct the public’s misperceptions about organics daily, I think it is time that reporters do their research, and stop leading the trusting readers to believe they are buying something much better than what they are actually getting! Sloppy background research will undermine the public’s trust in journalism.

Mary Choate
Arvada
Coastalfields Farm

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:11 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Climate change

Quit Pussy-foot’n around! Why does everything have to be sugar coated? Humans ‘very likely’ ignited global warming, panel says (Rocky Mountain News 2/2/07 page32) The world’s leading climate scientists supposedly using their most powerful language and they can’t up with anything better than “very likely"? How about the world is melting, move your children to higher ground before it’s too late. Instead they use terms such as “likely” “very likely” and “virtually certain". The term “very likely”
translates to 90% certainty that global warming is caused by humans. Why not just say 90% certain? Heck if I was 90% certain I would win the lottery I would actually play but “very likely” to win, I don’t know.

Steven Tubbs
Westminster

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:10 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Dave Schultheis

The Jan. 16 Rocky Mountain News article, Immigration critic blasts Ritter,” left me confused about Sen. David Schultheis’ stand on education.
The senator’s Web site quotes John Adams: “Children should be educated and instructed in the principles of freedom.” Now he criticizes Gov. Bill Ritter who wants to do just that by reducing the dropout rate of Hispanic, black and American Indian students. Yes, Hispanic, black and American Indian children are children, too, and they have a right to that freedom John Adams talked about!
I for one believe that educating all children is the best way to spend my tax money and I applaud Ritter. Let’s stop drawing lines based on color. Let’s work on immigration reform that allows all to contribute.
Educating children of hard-working immigrants so they may work legally and continue to contribute to our way of life is a good thing legal workers pay even more taxes.

Elena Sante
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:09 PM | Comments (19) | TrackBack

President Bush

Delusion of Grandeur
A man’s ego can be his worst enemy. Commonly misdirected ego, for men, can be described as individual desire for machismo and power. Any President of the United States thinking in terms of his opportunity to create, and leave behind, a great legacy, wouldn’t possibly let his ego get in the way – would he? Now try coupling ego with delusions of grandeur. Delusion being a daydream, a false impression, a misbelief, an oversight, capped off with self-deception. Grandeur being desire for celebrity, eminence, glory, greatness, stateliness, and transcendence. Wow! Writing these words, I’m getting a mental image of the current leadership of our country. Over 3,000 US troops killed and thousands more injured and, or maimed for life. Billions of dollars spent creating a quagmire that has worsened the political situation, and future, of our country and the Middle East. Now we cannot envision how to get out. Perhaps a reverse delusion of grandeur would work. In the history of man, politics, and warfare, more than one nation’s future has been ruined because of the delusions of grandeur of its leaders. The only question remaining is how long the populace will tolerate it? I hope the answer is “not much longer!”

Martin Perkins
Highlands Ranch

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:09 PM | Comments (17) | TrackBack

Budget

RMN FRAUD ! Your ‘budget’ headline (6Feb) accepts Administration claims that spending for Social Security will outweigh war spending..but the truth is that SS is now more than paying its way, from high FICA taxes paid in by the very people who will benefit.
In fact, SS is now showing a surplus of income over expenditures each year—so it should be shown as LESS-THAN-ZERO in budget reports.
Whereas the Pentagon is demanding $1700 MILLIONS each DAY.
We should refer to the Pentagon Deficit, not the Federal Deficit. All the other departments are now living within their means.
What a bunch of tame flacks are the RMN staff!

Dan Lyons
Fort Collins

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:08 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Renewable energy

Our state legislature is demonstrating positive and progressive leadership toward advancing alternative and renewable energy resources for Colorado. Presently, they are considering over a dozen alternative power bills.
In addition to legislation requiring utilities to generate 20 percent of their energy from renewable sources by the year 2020, other bills under consideration would provide funds to Colorado colleges/universities for biofuel projects, fund wind-powered generators for schools, and expand the transmission grids for making solar and wind power more accessible.
The benefits of expanding our alternative and renewable energy sources are enormous. Reducing our dependence on foreign oil strengthens our national security. Expanding alternative energy sources in conjunction with appropriate uses of oil and gas benefits consumers. The economic growth potential is demonstrated by the projected 400-plus jobs to be created by the proposed wind-power plant near Windsor.
I urge each of us to contact our legislators, encouraging and supporting their efforts in advancing alternative and renewable energy sources in Colorado.

Ken Bennett
Loveland

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:57 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Weather forecasters

I would like to take a moment to thank the Rocky Mountain News for compiling and publishing the snowfall predictions before the “storm” of Jan. 12-13 (“Snow forecasts run 1-12 inches,” Jan. 11).
In case anyone missed it, six separate meteorological entities (9News, CBS 4, Channel 7, the National Weather Service, Accuweather.com and Weather Central) had their predictions displayed on the pages of the Rocky before a single flake hit the ground. Per usual, almost all of them were substantially off the mark. The winner, at least from my observations, was the National Weather Service, which predicted 1-3 inches. CBS 4 won the “Most Wildly Inaccurate Forecast” award for their bold 6-12-inch guess.
It’s high time the meteorologists in these parts are held accountable for their meager forecasting abilities. As far as I can tell, each and every storm has just become a guessing game for the “experts” in our area.
I realize predicting weather in Colorado is tough, but I know a lot of these folks get paid a pretty decent penny and could be doing a lot better than they are (I’m talking specifically to you, Kathy Sabine). What other job out there lets you be right about 50 percent of the time with no repercussions? Get it together.
We deserve better.

Matt Allinson
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:56 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

The new Rocky

I like the new format for the Rocky Mountain News but I do have two complaints: some of the pages are not folded in the blank space in the middle of the sheet and some are folded such that part of the outside column is missing at the cut. Correct these deficiencies and the paper will be much better.

John McNeil
Castle Rock

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:24 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

The new Rocky

I am writing this to express my extreme disappointment in your new paper size and layout. Instead of a newspaper for representing a metro area like Denver, the new Rocky is better suited to be another tabloid on display at the supermarket checkout line. It is far less interesting in layout and content than previously. For example, the former weather page was one of the best I have seen in any paper. It now is half the size, smaller in print and, of course, stuffed with ads. I would gladly switch my subscription to The Denver Post if it wasn’t even worse than the Rocky.” Looks like we’re stuck with this mini-paper for now.
Perhaps the Rocky will get enough of these opinions to consider going back to its previous layout and size. In this particular instance, newer is not always better.

Mark Calcaterra
Littleton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:23 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

I have followed with interest the discussion of Amendment 41 in the Rocky Mountain News and elsewhere in the media. Jared Polis and Common Cause are far too politically sophisticated not to have understood the implications of Amendment 41. The question is, why did they want to screw the state of Colorado in this manner?

William C. Rense
Estes Park

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:23 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Barack Obama

As a historian who has always considered Abraham Lincoln our greatest president, Vincent Carroll’s comments on him and Barack Obama struck me as fascinating (“The Lincoln analogy,” On Point, Jan. 18).
I do think Obama has potential to be as much of a leader on an issue every bit as important as slavery was in Lincoln’s day — the issue of the international pandemic of HIV/AIDS. Last summer, Obama and his wife visited Kenya and took HIV tests. That is a much bigger deal than it might sound at first, as almost no African leaders will take that step.
I really believe that as HIV spreads rapidly through Africa, India, Russia and China, it will become the No. 1 issue (not only a health issue and moral issue, but an issue of economics and national security as well) in the world.
Just as Lincoln transcended most Americans’ local or state loyalties in 1858 with his “House Divided” speech and subsequent fight against slavery, Obama could transcend most Americans’ nationalism and lead by example as we really escalate the international fight against HIV.
My wife is Zambian and our family has been devastated by HIV, so I speak from personal experience. This issue needs to be an absolute top priority, and Obama could make it happen.
Keep up the good work.

Dr. Andrew J. DeRoche
Front Range Community College
Longmont

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:22 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Mike Littwin

Has Littwin finally taken leave of his senses-actually badmouthing DEMOCRATS!! I’m sure this will cause Molly Ivins to turn over in her grave if she knows that one of her poison mouthed followers has actually departed (temporarily) from Republican bashing.

Jim Cooley
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:21 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

The new Rocky

Sure like the new Rocky Mountain News. Wish it were like that seven days a week. I’m 84 years old and it is so easy to read.

Charles E. Bryant
Loveland

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:20 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

The obvious intent of Amendment 41 avoiding lobbyists gifting money to a child of a legislator in return for favorable consideration.
Not mentioned in the discussion regarding scholarships is that these “children” are now 18 and legally responsible for themselves, with the exception that many are still claimed on their parents’ taxes. What control the parents have over whether or not gifts, grants or scholarships are accepted by these children stops at 18.
Additionally, how do you account for children, or adults for that matter, who are not in contact with each other, who may not even be aware that one or the other works for the state. An example of a state worker who has had no contact with their child for several years, and now this child at 18 finds out they may be ineligible for a scholarship? Or the parent state worker who’s child is 36 and going back to school for a masters and gets a scholarship?
There is no control after 18. What can be done to fix it?

Tina Cook
Broomfield

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:19 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

'The Crossing’

The new format of the Rocky Mountain News is a major disappointment in all respects except the colors, which are exceptional. For a newspaper, that is.
In the Briefings section — how about again putting the location of the event in the heading of the item so we don’t have to hunt for it in the body of the paragraph?
Speaking of hunting, whose bright idea was it to hide the legal notices somewhere inside with the car ads and job opportunities? Return them to the back page or inside back page where they have been for as long as most people can remember.
Finally, “The Crossing,” this continuing saga of a train wreck from 45 years ago. Six weeks of this we’re going to endure, with recaps each weekend of the previous week’s columns? Give me a break! Who cares? The Rocky doesn’t have enough current news it could print? This series could have been dealt with in a week — if it had to run at all. It was Ambrose Bierce who, reviewing a book, observed that “The covers of this book are too far apart.” That is an apt description of the train-wreck tale. Endless repetition. Five days — five days! for the train to get to the crossing? Cut your losses now. Get back on track.

Lansin R. Carmean
Broomfield

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:18 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Mike Littwin

The Rocky finally takes columnist Mike Littwin out of its new section and, in return, gives him the inside of the back cover. And still he whines about it! Littwin should feel lucky that his socialist propaganda rants were not stuck in the editorials where they belong. Fortunately for him, we still live in a free society and he can seek employment elsewhere.

Joe Burke
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:17 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

The new Rocky

I waited for three days to comment on the new format of your paper. The new size makes it easy to handle over breakfast — thank you. The smaller print and darker paper make it much harder to read, I called and asked if there was a large-print edition available.
I would like to point out that you forgot something — the news! You forgot to include news in your new-sized paper. You have pages on a 46-year-old train-bus wreck, but only tiny clips here and there of actual current events; locally and worldwide. More space is devoted to extended commentary by Tina Griego, Mike Littwin and Bill Johnson than you devote to current events. To paraphrase an old TV commercial, “Where’s the news?”

Tory Brown
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:16 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

‘The Crossing’

Is letter writer Liz Wolfson completely insensitive to people’s tragedies (“No current events?” Talk Back to the Media, Jan. 27) or just ignorant? Because an event occurred 45 years ago (“The Crossing”) doesn’t mean some of us aren’t interested in reading about it. For Wolfson to say the story “just doesn’t grab much interest” is an insult to the families who lost their children that fateful day.
And the type size in the Rocky is fine — Wolfson should buy some stronger reading glasses.

Monica Blake
Glenwood Springs

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:16 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

February 11, 2007
Clouding the issue on climate change

An article in the Jan. 31 issue of the Rocky reports on the alleged muzzling by the administration of scientists wanting to speak their mind on the subject of climate change (“U.S. climate scientists can’t speak freely, Congress told”). A congressional oversight committee is investigating these allegations and, true to the script of how these committees appear to function, progress to date has produced mostly claims, counterclaims and statements of outright obfuscation for the public’s consumption.
Perfect example: Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia stated, “I am no climate-change denier.” Good start, but he didn’t quit while he was ahead. He finished with, “The mere convergence of politics and science does not itself denote interference.” I have read that sentence a couple of dozen times and I am still baffled at what he is trying to say or not say. For shame, Rep. Davis; with such a brazen example of “governmentspeak,” you only add to the growing skepticism and cynicism of the public toward both sides of the aisle in both houses of Congress. We deserve better!

Lou Bindner, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 11:59 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Put climate change in perspective

I need to respond to the Rocky article of Feb. 3, “Western droughts could become norm.” It takes sixth-grade science and an ounce of common sense to put it in perspective. We know that climate change over centuries is about the equivalent of weather change from day to day. To think that we can predict climate change when we can’t predict the weather for tomorrow is ridiculous. One sunspot that we will not even know about until the light reaches us will change our climate more than man has since he learned to build a fire.
We learned in grade school science that animal life and fire take in oxygen and emit carbon dioxide. Plant life takes in carbon dioxide and emits oxygen. It stands to reason that if there is too much carbon dioxide in the air, plant life will flourish and animal life and fire will suffer. If there is not enough carbon dioxide
in the air, plant life will suffer. If we were really concerned about the environment we would be more concerned about plant life than animal life.
As far as man’s contribution to greenhouse gases, just imagine if there were no roads or reservoirs or farms or greenbelts and man never put out a wildfire. There would be twice as much carbon dioxide in the air.
Maybe we should send Al Gore and Michael Moore to the sun with a can of gas and a fire extinguisher and they can control our temperature.

Keith Sharpe, Commerce City

Posted by denver-admin at 11:59 PM | Comments (53) | TrackBack

Don’t move caucuses

Some have recently suggested the very bad idea of moving the caucus date up to February in 2008.
If anything, it should be moved back to April or even to May. The warmer weather would increase participation, whereas the February date will very likely just kill it off.
People who care about the grass roots and neighborhoods should speak out about this now.
John Wren, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 11:21 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

A solution for surge

There is a very simple solution to the current controversy over George W. Bush’s desire to send 21,500 more troops to Iraq.
According to the College Republican National Committee Web site: “The CRNC currently has over a quarter of a million members on over 1,800 campuses nationwide.”
If only one out of 10 joins up and volunteers for Iraq, that’s 25,000 troops. More than enough to do the job.
And, as an added bonus, the other 225,000 members could hold “Support our Troops” fundraisers to buy Kevlar vests, silly string and Humvees, and I’m sure the proud parents would be happy to chip in, too.
Problem solved.

Tommy Holeman, Boulder

Posted by denver-admin at 11:20 PM | Comments (17) | TrackBack

'1001’ insulting

Unless you wish to feel viciously insulted as an American Jew, don’t go to see the Denver Center Theatre Company’s production of 1001. In this contrived effort, there is neither meaningful plot nor development of character. Instead of authentic drama we are presented with the stereotypes of Jews and Muslims, and the violent rendering of a religious Jew.
As an avid theatergoer and a Jewish American who seeks peace through understanding, I was offended by the use of theatrical devices which, in the chaos of 1001, were supposed to pass as theater.

Marilyn Kopelman, Greenwood Village

Posted by denver-admin at 11:16 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Let’s see how Dems tackle benefits system

So, it turns out that the 2-year-old computer system for administering welfare benefits in Colorado doesn’t work, and Democratic state lawmakers can’t wait to assign the blame to the already-exited Owens administration (“Hearing eyes benefits woes,” Jan. 18).
One would think this is the first automated system in Colorado that didn’t work as advertised. (Can we say “DIA baggage system”?)
While the legislature ultimately controls the budget, and surely had something to do with this fiasco, to be fair it should be acknowledged that if the Owens administration undertook this project and it doesn’t work, they should shoulder most of the blame, right up to January of 2007. Now it remains to be seen if Bill Ritter’s crew can do much better, and how much more it costs the state to do it.
Bear just one thing in mind while Democrats howl over the inefficiency and cost overruns associated with this bureaucratic nightmare: These are the same folks who want government to be in charge of running your health care.
Michael Trimble, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 11:15 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Story on Noel failed to note consequences

The Rocky Mountain News story of Feb. 6, “Rachel Noel: ‘If you're right, you don't give up,’” was very selective in its placement of praise on Noel as the person most responsible for the implementation of forced desegregation of Denver’s public schools.
The writer ignored completely the harm Denver incurred as a result of this social engineering, as parents who had worked hard to elevate their lifestyles watched in amazement as their children were placed on buses for an hour-plus ride to failing inner-city schools.
The response on the part of many was an exodus of sorts, as much of Denver’s middle class fled to Jefferson and Arapahoe counties. Many of those left behind were relegated to what are now isolated pockets of poverty and neighborhoods more segregated than they were before forced desegregation of the schools was implemented.
It is not my intention to cast Noel as a person with bad intentions. To the contrary, I am sure that she held a deep desire to improve life for all people. But history must judge the consequences of a person’s actions, not just the good intentions.
Forced busing was a miserable failure. Those who irreparably harmed the city of my youth should be held to account, not praised.

John Ebel, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 11:14 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Religious right’s sense of entitlement

There can be no better illustration of the religious right’s sense of entitlement than the bill recently introduced by state Sen. Dave Schultheis (“Religion rights bill proposed for schools,” Jan. 27).
He wants our government to legally protect publicly paid teachers who refuse to do the jobs they are paid for — so long as they refuse for “religious” reasons. And, in an educational climate where a teacher can be suspended for the display of the United Nations flag, he wants protect the right of these work-shirking teachers to subject their students to display and discussion of religious materials that represent the teachers’ own religious convictions.
The public should not pay for teachers who refuse to do the work they are assigned. Nor should the public be required to pay for evangelizing in the classroom where attendance is compulsory.

Ken Kloppenborg, Lakewood

Posted by denver-admin at 11:13 PM | Comments (28) | TrackBack

February 09, 2007
Ivins will be missed

It is great sadness that we note the passing of Molly Ivins.
One of the highlights of the week was reading her column most Sundays in the Rocky . She will be greatly missed.

Andrew and Deborah Ross, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 11:21 PM | Comments (25) | TrackBack

Unimportant details

Why does Rocky media critic Jason Salzman constantly try to find scandal where none exists?
If Steve Farber decides to spend $105 on a bottle of champagne to celebrate the Democrats bringing their convention to Denver, it should be a private matter (“Little touches add a lot in reporting,” On the Media, Jan. 20). Farber is paying for this out of his own pocket, after all. My pockets are nowhere near as deep as Farber’s but I myself would subsidize $105 for a reward for the efforts of those who brought this boon to Denver.
Salzman needs to focus on issues that matter.

Marilyn Swan, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 11:21 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Helmet references

In the Jan. 29 Rocky story, “Skier, 56, killed at Keystone,” the skier died from injuries not related to his head. To quote from the article: “He was conscious when he was found but was bleeding internally from blunt force injuries, Richardson said. The bleeding led to his death.”
Why does every accident on a bicycle or a snowboard or skis have to include “the person was (or was not) wearing a helmet” when the injuries related to the accident have nothing to do with wearing a helmet?
I never see “the skier/biker was not wearing gloves” if their hands were not injured.

Steve Smith, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 11:20 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

New Rocky is sharp

The new format of the Rocky Mountain News is really sharp. The print font is easier on the eyes, and the smaller-size paper is easier to hold, if you are reading while traveling or in a waiting room.
Great job!

A. Hudson, Lochbuie

Posted by denver-admin at 11:19 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Today’s news, please

I subscribe to the Rocky to get the news, not to be told to go online to get a complete listing (I refer to the full list of Screen Actors Guild award winners the Rocky decided not to publish on Jan. 29).
Are we to be faced with a continuance of this arbitrary attitude? The Rocky can spend days covering an event that happened 45 years ago, but I expect to read today’s news.
If I wanted to read the news online, I wouldn’t pay the Rocky for the paper.

Paull Kupler, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 11:19 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

A paper with panache

The morning of Jan. 23 was a joy! Everything that was promised about the new format of the Rocky was right on. It is the perfect size and the quality of print is stunning. (In the past there has always been print bleed-over from the facing page, often making concluding remarks on an article unreadable.)
The new edition has caused discomfort in our house because my wife — who reads the Post — is more jealous than before and insists that she will cancel the Post and order another copy of the Rocky.
In the 1930s and early ’40s, I earned a few bucks delivering the Rocky. It can’t be much easier now, but as a reader it is always at the front door and, now, joyfully presented in a style that starts the day with panache. Thanks!

Howard Ewy, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 11:18 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

New Rocky has problems

The new format of the Rocky Mountain News at first seemed neat — and it is easier to handle — but it has distinct problems.
For older readers and many others, some of the print is clearly smaller, limiting our reading, and much of it is printed lightly. The first issue, at least, had the old problem of some blurring, and it was poorly folded.
As to content, the editor, for evidently political motives, moved Mike Littwin and other columnists to the back of the paper, even beyond us letter writers. Littwin is to the Rocky what Mike Royko was to the Chicago Tribune. Their kind of columns attract readers, pro and con.
We would hope that the editors will carefully consider the comments of those of us who take the time to respond to your new format, making at least some changes for the better.

Ron and Betty Vander Kooi, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 11:15 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

A Differing View: Candidates could not ignore inland areas

The Rocky editorial of Jan. 22, “Don’t neuter Electoral College,” says that if presidential candidates were elected by the popular vote, a candidate might campaign in a handful of metropolitan areas on the coasts, and would treat inland areas like a nuisance.
First, that would never happen. In presidential elections, the Democratic candidate always carries the big cities, but that is never going to be enough votes by itself to win the election. No serious candidate would concentrate on only coastal metropolitan cities.
Second, if presidential elections were decided by popular vote, it is possible that candidates might visit more locations in the country. Currently, only swing states get much attention from presidential candidates. According to an analysis by The Washington Post, in the 2004 campaign, with the exception of Kerry visiting his home state, the candidates were intelligently concentrating their visits on those states that were “in play.” If the presidential election were decided by a popular vote, perhaps the presidential candidates would not make Ohio their second home, and could visit other parts of the country more frequently.
Finally, the U.S. Constitution is silent on how electors should be chosen. Two states, Maine and Nebraska, do not choose electors by the winner-take-all method. Instead, those two states give one elector for the winner in each congressional district and two electors for the overall winner of the state. If states want to choose electors based on the national popular vote, that is their prerogative.
While it would be nice if the voters decided to change how to select our state’s electors, I don’t find it necessary. If Senate Bill 46 is enacted, the end result is that the person who received the most votes nationally would be guaranteed to be elected president, which strikes me as a fair result.

Andrew Steinberg is a resident of Aurora.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:01 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

A Differing View: Legislators merit blame for ethics fiasco

“Living with 41,” the Rocky Mountain News editorial of Feb. 7, blames the voters for the Amendment 41 fiasco. And it is a fiasco. However, the Rocky blames the wrong people.
The blame goes to the legislature, not the voters. Any measure that is done by proposition is a blunt instrument. They are good for addressing large issues, but bad when it comes to nuance. For nuance, we have our elected representatives. In this case, the elected representatives failed. Much as they have failed in Washington. When abuses were abundant, the legislature did nothing to correct them. As a result, the people felt they had no alternative to voting for Amendment 41.
Had there been an alternative proposed for the legislature, perhaps Amendment 41 would never have come to be. For every action there is a reaction.
That applies to inaction as well.
Do not blame the people — they did all they could do. Yes, it is bad. But it is better than the legislative alternative, which was to do nothing.

Allan Berger is a resident of Lakewood.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:59 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

CU presidency

Regarding a replacement for Hank Brown as CU president.
We should get someone at CU with a new and different objective, reducing the cost of college to make it affordable again.
Costs of higher education have risen at more than double the inflation rate for the last 20 years. When my children attended more than 15 years ago, it was barely affordable. Now, it is out of reach of me and most middle class people.
The answer is not in gouging the taxpayers for more subsidy money, but in reducing costs. Give me a couple of years running the place, and I would have tuition and fees down by half. Grandiose buildings, nonsensical courses (Ethnic Studies, etc), outlandish and unnecessary instructors could all be cut out.
Hire a hard-headed business manager who can impose and enforce budgets and trim costs.

Bill Harrison
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:59 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Charles Krauthammer

Nonsense and piffle, Charles ( Krauthammer! ) The failure of this administration’s Iraq policy, contary to your Bushian logic ( “Blame America first and last,” February 5, ) is not the fault of the Iraqi people or its politicians for not taking advantage of the opportunity that our military provided for them. Rather, that failure can clearly be traced back to the failure of George W. Bush’s ( and Donald Rumsfeld’s ) failure to provide security for the Iraqi people, their homes, infrastructure, institutions and resources ( like arms caches ) during the initial invasion phase of the Saddam Hussein Assassination ( pardon me ... Iraqi War. ) Had our deciders not decided to run their caper on the cheap - in order to impress American taxpayers with their frugality - they would would have provided for a couple of hundred thousand more troops on the ground to provide control and security for the subjugated people and for our troops.
Now the Great Decider wants to go back and establish that security so that his “surge” can cleanse the country of resurgents. He expects the Iraqis to “stand up so that we can stand down” when we never provided the Iraqis with the security and protection to trust and cooperate with us in the first place. Sure, so our soldiers gave out some candy bars and built some playgrounds - but compared to the bloodshed and destruction we’ve allowed, that is as nothing.
Mr. K is right about one thing, this situation is not America’s fault or the military’s - it is Bush’s, for the Americans ( and yes, even Democrats ) who supported the invasion did not expect, and still cannot believe, the ineptitude and shortsightedness ( and yes, arrogance ) with which this campaign has been waged. The onus is squarely upon George W. Bush’s shoulders, and those who still support him; and speaking of these, why is it so difficult to get volunteers to supplement our troops? Why aren’t those who believe in this “surge,” and who are able-bodied, lining up to join the Army or Marines right now?

R. Kiefer
Arvada

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:59 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Amendment 41

Regarding Amendment 41 nullification by Romanoff (D).
Voters approved Amendment 41 as written, not on hidden intent, and this is now a part of the constitution. Thus, it is above the authority of the state legislature.
If Jared Polis, who bought this, doesn’t like it, then let him buy another amendment to nullify it.
However, if the legislature dares to nullify 41, let them also nullify Amendment 23, and the de-Bruce Amendment. Maybe a few others, too.

Bill Harrison
Aurora

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:59 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Sen. Ken Salazar

As Channel 4’s CBS “Reality Check” took place last night with Senator Ken Salazar, the Senator came up with his own third way of dealing with the Iraq war. He wants to put our troops out of harms way, “a secure area", along the Iraqi borders with Iran and Syria. The reason he says is to secure Iraq’s borders with them and prevent infiltration by their neighbors.
Isn’t that the same plan and reason which he opposes for America’s border with Mexico?

George Lilly
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:58 PM | Comments (34) | TrackBack

HPV vaccine

I would like to express my concern about SB 80, HPV Vaccine Mandate. I applaud our state legislators for taking a stand for the health and welfare of our citizens. As a Family Nurse Practitioner, I am dismayed that a country that treasures freedom would use the government to force unnecessary medical treatment on our children.
The medication insert from Merck states that this vaccine will prevent 4 out of 100 HPV strains that are in the population. HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States. This infection is transmitted skin to skin and is not protected by condoms.
When considering the HPV virus we must put it in perspective. We are not talking about preventing a disease like chicken pox or polio where transmission is airborne. One thing that must be considered is will this vaccine reduce cancer rates or raise them. The reality is that by providing a vaccine that only covers 4% of the known strains of this virus, it will create the perception of immunity, and because of that this very preventable activity of sex outside of marriage will actually increase because of this vaccine. This vaccine is being sold as a vaccine when at best it is a partial vaccine The increase in cancer that will come if this bill passes will far outweigh any benefits. And because this bill will likely lead to an increase in cancer, we will see an increase in health care costs and untold amount of suffering.
We should not pretend that everyone in the population is at risk for this disease. The best way to prevent HPV is to wait for marriage. We should be honest with our children about sexually transmitted diseases. It is wrong to force young girls to take a vaccine for a disease they have no chance of getting if she isn’t engaging in sexually activity. Why is it we expect kids to say no to drugs? But we won’t even attempt to tell them to say no to sex outside of marriage, even though this very issue provides the concrete evidence of why they should.

Lolita Hanks, RN, BSN, MS, FNP-C
Littleton

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:57 PM | Comments (23) | TrackBack

Charles Krauthammer

‘HOW DID WE CAUSE IRAQ CIVIL WAR ? BY NOT PREVENTING IT?’ sarcastically asks hawk Krauthammer (5Feb).
Very simple; if someone had ousted Tito, they’d be responsible for resulting Yugoslav anarchy.
By ousting Saddam, we’re responsible for this bloody anarchy !

Dan Lyons
Fort Collins

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:56 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Psychiatry exhibit

On Point: “Museum Oversteps,” Feb. 6, 2007
Editorial page editor Vincent Carroll objects to the Citizens Commission on Human Rights’ “demonization” of psychiatry at the Colorado History Museum and asks, “Would the (Colorado Historical) society throw open its doors to an exhibit on immigration by David Duke’s European-American Unity and Rights Organization? An exhibit by Ward Churchill on U.S. imperialism?”
I sincerely hope so, with only one caveat: factual accuracy is a legitimate concern of museum gatekeepers, but an exhibitor’s opinion of facts is not.
It is not enough to tolerate the First Amendment grudgingly, as polls indicate many freedom-forsaking Americans do these days. Free speech must be nurtured affirmatively regardless of its palatability to the people, government or editorial editors.
The more forthrightly radical and disturbing the speech is, the more valuable it is to a citizenry seduced by disingenuously “balanced” propaganda. The former provokes a quest for the whole truth, while the latter lulls one into unwarranted and dangerous complacency.
I commend the Colorado Historical Society for renting museum space to this Scientology-sponsored exhibit even though I, like Carroll, find the exhibit’s rhetoric offensive (and its sponsor too, for that matter). During this intellectual Dark Age of the Bush administration, it is rare and heartening to find any government agency taking such a principled stance, with the stalwart exception of public libraries. Public libraries do not bar learners based solely on what they wish to learn, and public museums should not bar exhibitors based solely on what they wish to exhibit.

David Hakala
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:56 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Bad laws

Concerning Amendment 41 and the smoking debate in public places. I say that the Colorado legislators go back to school and learn how to pass a decent law. I tired of them passing laws and then amending them because of all the loopholes. Next time you push a bill through their proper channels, learn the language of the law. That is why you are there. You spend more time and monies going back and fixing your mistakes.

Leroy M. Martinez
Denver

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:55 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Xcel power plant

Whether or not the PUC acted within its legal authority when allowing Xcel Energy to collect now from its customers to finance the construction of the Comanche III old technology coal fired plant, it is a mistake to let the construction and operation of this plant go forward.
Just this week we have had another definite statement that human activity is a “very likely” cause of climate change, and global warming in particular, from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in a consensus report that took into account 30000 comments from 600 reviewers around the world.
The exact consequences of global warming are still unknown but the possible ones are dire, the melting of polar ice caps with associated flooding of high population coastal areas, more extreme weather events, crop failures from increasing temperatures and decreases in precipitation, etc. The risks are high enough that policy makers ranging from the Prime Minister of Britain, to members of the United States Senate, to the Chief Executive Officers of multinational corporations believe that we should start now to take steps to reduce our impacts on global warming.
One of the most suggested policy changes is an end to the construction and operation of old technology coal fired power plants. In a recent article appearing in the Scientific American David Hawkins and coauthors explained that over their 60 year life spans the old technology coal fired power plants planned or now in construction will “collectively introduce … as much carbon dioxide as was released by all the coal burned since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution.” This is an unacceptable course to take if we wish to reduce our contribution to global warming. Why should we build Comanche III if we can see that this is coming?
Even if this plant is not shut down there is a very high likelihood that Xcel, and hence its customers, will have to pay a carbon tax premium to continue to operate it. Such a tax will be designed to provide incentive to switch to cleaner energy sources; so we may anticipate that it will (and should) be a stiff one – maybe to the point where operating clean alternatives is cheaper. Why should we build a plant that we will be taxed to operate?
The answer to both of these questions is simple. We should not allow Comanche III to be built and operated.

David Down
Boulder

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:54 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Sen. Wayne Allard

Over the last two years I have seen several negative articles, comments in the National & local press about Senator Wayne Allard. It seems a national article will be repeated in the local press, with added offhand negative comments by local writers such as Mike Litwin. They pass along negativity probably coming from their need to put out a certain number of words on a regular basis or based on personal bias.
Dr. Allard was my Veterinarian for several years. He was knowledgeable about every problem I brought to him with my dogs & cats. He solved them all including a complicated knee operation for my dog. His office was functional, spartan and comfortable. He was personable, friendly and I enjoyed going to his office. I knew I was getting good value for my animals and my time.
When he was elected as a State Senator, he put in bills his first year that were passed, and continued to represented his constituents well there for eight years.
Now as U.S. Senator, he works hard to meet National and Local needs for all of us, and has an aggressive agenda set for the 110th Congress. You can go to his website to see this agenda for 2007 and his past bills. He also runs his Senate office the way he ran his business, frugally, returning office money to the government for most years.
I want to thank you Senator Allard for you positive, Intelligent work for these 23 years you have served Colorado and the nation as Senator and Representative. I hope we find someone like to take your place in 2008. People like you are rare and hard to find.

Ernie Powell
Fort Collins

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:53 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Littwin & Stein

I hope The Rocky is printing plenty of extra copies of today’s (2/6/07) paper.
Today, on page 38, two of the paper’s lockstep liberals, Mike Littwin and Ed Stein, actually take mild shots at Jared (big money in politics is bad, except when it’s mine) Polis, and St. John-of-the-permanent-honeymoon-Hickenlooper.
On the same day! On the same page!
I’m saving this paper. I’m sure that someday, it’ll be as valuable as one of those postage stamps with a reversed image.

Steve Baur
Westminster

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at