[an error occurred while processing this directive]

LATEST LETTERS

Room enough for both

Saturday, April 28 at 12:01 AM

Sally Cumine of Denver writes:
The newspapers are all about people — their stories, events, disasters, wars etc. Once in a while there is something about animals in the paper. It may be just a blurb or a big story such as the pet-food recall.
But, there is <i>alwaysi> someone who writes in — or a columnist like Jason Salzman (On the Media, April 14) — who complains, “But, what about people? Why aren’t we talking about people’s plights?” Geez! Can’t we do both?

READER COMMENTS

Sally,

The animal kingdom can get as much ink as they want. They just need to get their own paper.

Posted by Charles B on April 28, 2007 12:42 AM

Well of course, you could teach Fido, or Fluffy, how to boot up a computer, type, proofread, and email a letter, or column. Bet they would be just about as good as some we see here.

Arf! Arf! Arf!

Posted by Old Grouch on April 28, 2007 07:03 AM

There's plenty of column space devoted to animals in the paper--quite often the Spotlight section has some really tasty recipes in it!

Posted by shaupeen on April 28, 2007 08:13 AM

Aren't humans animals?

Posted by Charles B on April 28, 2007 10:54 AM

Goldurnit, Charles B.

You done went an let that thar cat outen the bag.

Now them there PETA folks an tha like ain't agonna be able ta feel like humans are so all fired "inferior" anymore. An what are they gonna do now?.

Posted by Old Grouch on April 28, 2007 01:51 PM

Old Grouch,

You have a Twain-like prowess with po-dunk inflection.

Posted by Charles B on April 28, 2007 09:53 PM

Thank you, Charles.

It's work; but it's fun too. I try for Brett Harte style too; but . . . . What happened to the days when the real American classics were part of the basic education?

Or, as we say out hyar in Injun Fightin Country: "Tain't jest thet thar spellin' an grammar what makes fer somethin' ta be a good idee, an worth athinkin' over."

Posted by Old Grouch on April 29, 2007 08:38 AM