[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Neo-cons
Thursday, May 10 at 10:37 AM

Pete Klammer of Wheat Ridge writes:

Q: How many neocons does it take to replace a burnt-out lightbulb?
A: That is defeatist, unpatriotic question that supports terrorism and undermines our troops, and anyone who says we need a new lightbulb now, just as the surge is beginning to make progress, without completing the mission, is unacceptable.

This letter has not been edited.


READER COMMENTS

An electrical surge will blow out a lightbulb. Will that embolden ouir enemies?

Posted by Sharon B. on May 10, 2007 02:43 PM

A:
None, they prefer being kept in the dark.

Posted by CL on May 10, 2007 02:52 PM

What the heack is a neo-con? Turn off the TV and radio...life is so much more pleasant.

But, to answer the question...I think Pete needs to change his own lightbulb.

Posted by my name 2 on May 10, 2007 02:53 PM

"What the heack is a neo-con"

Didn't you see The Matrix? Neo is a trendy new prefix for use with any and all words, regardless of whether it makes sense or not.

Posted by No use on May 10, 2007 02:59 PM

Neolib!

Posted by on May 10, 2007 03:47 PM

Neoneos!!!!

Posted by No use on May 10, 2007 04:24 PM

A:

It takes one incompetant crony, one no-bid contract to Halliburton, a dozen low-level political operatives appointed to positions for which they have no discernable experience besides loyalty to the president, and 100,000 paid mercinaries doing the same jobs as our troops for 5 times the money at taxpayers expense.

Add a CEO with a billion dollar severance package payable upon completion despite the later discovery that the lightbulb was fine and nobody had tried flipping the switch.

A public relations think tank would then need to be formed to come up with clever Orwellian semantic techniques for blaming it all on Bill Clinton.
.

Posted by Charles B on May 10, 2007 04:45 PM

Neo-Clinton-Apologist.

Sorry Charles B, I had to say it.

Posted by KW on May 10, 2007 04:49 PM

Neo-con ....A first time prisoner.

Posted by A on May 10, 2007 05:04 PM

Neo-con ....A first time prisoner.

Posted by A on May 10, 2007 05:06 PM

"A: That is defeatist, unpatriotic question that supports terrorism and undermines our troops, and anyone who says we need a new lightbulb now, just as the surge is beginning to make progress, without completing the mission, is unacceptable."

Is that neo-English?

Posted by Mike on May 10, 2007 05:14 PM

"Is that neo-English?"

neo-grammer..

Posted by Charles B on May 10, 2007 07:05 PM

Thank you, Charles.

But, that would be 'grammar'.

Posted by Mike on May 10, 2007 07:13 PM

I stand corrected. (bows deeply)

Posted by Charles B on May 10, 2007 09:56 PM
Posted by Keith on May 10, 2007 10:16 PM

POST A COMMENT










Remember your personal info?






LATEST LETTERS
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]