• Front page
• Receive letters on your RSS reader

Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

The White House is fully justified in the eviction of the three critics from the 2005 public forum in Denver. If anyone owes an apology, it is certainly not the White House. It is right and proper for the Bush administration to take whatever action is necessary to protect the President from possible troublemakers. The facts indicate that this was indeed the case. The abusive language of the critics does not even suggest free speech, as you would have it. It is, in essence, an example of the abject hatred of the left for this administration. Your editorial misses the mark.

This letter has not been edited.

READER COMMENTS

YAWN.

Your leader is a gutless maggot, Stuckey. That makes him several orders a higher form of life than you. Defend his crimes to the bitter end, they will be dragged into the light.

I thought the White House aka the Bush administration said they didn`t know about this? I apologized for thinking they did, now Brian says I was right. Now my brain is frozen.

Is there a continuous loop running around Stuckey's head where he keeps repeating the same junk over & over. Is this early onset wingnut Alzheimer's?

Two letters in one day?

Whose d*ck is Brian Stuckey sucking at the RMN? Or is he the one in charge of choosing which letters to publish?

Seriously, RMN. You've deleted my comment 3 times now. Here's an idea....take letters from someone other than this blowhard!

Two letters in one day?

Whose d*ck is Brian Stuckey sucking at the RMN? Or is he the one in charge of choosing which letters to publish?

Seriously, RMN. You've deleted my comment 3 times now. Here's an idea....take letters from someone other than this blowhard!

Two letters in one day?

Whose d*ck is Brian Stuckey sucking at the RMN? Or is he the one in charge of choosing which letters to publish?

Seriously, RMN. You've deleted my comment 3 times now. Here's an idea....take letters from someone other than this blowhard!

Two letters in one day?

Whose d*ck is Brian Stuckey sucking at the RMN? Or is he the one in charge of choosing which letters to publish?

Seriously, RMN. You've deleted my comment 3 times now. Here's an idea....take letters from someone other than this blowhard!

Brian Stuckey is an Energizer Bunny with Talking-Points Tourette Syndrome.

He's an Authoritarian Bush Cultist Cuckoo Clock.

"He's a well respected man about town doing the best things so conservatively"

Tbone,

Just taking a wild guess, I'd say that the webmaster - or monitor, or whatever - here is having a lot of fun with us all. And, since we're having fun too, I guess he/she is entitled to a share.

But, again just as a wild guess, I would kind of bet - were I a betting man - that "Brian Stuckey" is a name used to post the same old same old, week after week, after week, after . . . so that the pair sometimes known as "Batman and Robin" have a place to keep on posting their endless same old same old, week after week, after week, after . . . as well.

And I wouldn't be all that surprised if one - or both - in that duo wasn't really "Brian Stuckey" to begin with - maybe taking turns to put up each his own favorite "topic".

Or is that too far fetched a "conspiracy theory"?

Anyway, thanks to the Rocky for the forum itself. And thanks for the fun, too.

OG,

Just as an aside, I did get an email from a Rocky emloyee once explaining that a post of mine was removed.

Apparently they removed a post that I was responding to because it was a little overboard xenophobic and they had to remove my response because without the context of the original it would've looked like a really mean-spirited non-sequitor.

I asked her in response if there is someone monitoring the forum and she said only informally. Nobody has the job of moderator.

POST A COMMENT

• 'Kid Nation' reality show a new low
• Rivers a shameful hire
• Too little news
• ‘Diesel’ fumes
• Unlocalized story a disservice to readers
• Riled up by Christian music
• Darling of the left
• Solutions too costly