[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

May 2007 | Main | July 2007

June 30, 2007
Ed Stein

Don R. Sherwood of Boulder writes:

Mr. Stein, I’m looking for some of your clever cartoons criticizing secular progressive’s conducting AMBUSH INTERVIEWS. I don’t recall seeing any, but, being the fair minded individual that you are, surely it is that I’ve just not looked closely enough, since you find AMBUSH INTERVIEWS so distasteful, you must have called out such when you saw it.
60 Minutes, that long running secular progressive program, so adored by secular progressives like yourself, comes to mind as a prime candidate for your wicked funny pen.
As I recall, Joanne Ostrow called Bill O’Reilly, a racist - that debate ending secular progressive epithet of which secular progressive are so fond - then refused an interview to defend her position, until providing her pathetic comments in the “ambush interview. Helayne Jones hides under her desk when asked for an interview. At the last BVSD Board meeting on the subject, her conclusion was “mistakes were made.
Certainly, no one was responsible, just “mistakes were made. When it is discovered there are damaging emails between BVSD School Board members, a lawsuit is required to pry access to elected official’s communications, which are OPEN by Colorado law.
Ms. Ostrow and Ms. Jones dress up like a soccer balls, then they (and you) whine when they get kicked.
It is so much fun to hear the squeal of SP’s when they get a dose of their favorite tactics.
As usually, you are so far off base, it is hardly worth printing or commenting on, but I couldn’t resist.
The RMN might do well to emulate the Denver Post’s dismissal of Spencer and Carmen: a little subtraction to increase the RMN’s “balance. I can envision the headline now: “Stein Secular Progressive Platform GONE; He’s Unemployed. Sounds good to me.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

‘Redneck’

Grant D. Cyrus of Boulder writes:

Question. Is the word Redneck derogatory?
I have a genuinely honest and open question for the, what,’ European American’ community. Is it alright to use the word Redneck? My gutbrain as Stephen Colbert would say tells me no, that it is in fact an insult. A serious insult. However after querying exactly ten White males I know I was told absolutely not. ‘I’m proud to be Redneck (sometimes)’ was a common refrain. And yet I still find this difficult to get my head wrapped around. Could this be true though? Maybe I’ve just heard one too many ‘Brothers’ I know use the word vehemently and prefacing it with the vicious mother ‘hubbard’ word to ever be comfortable addressing anyone with it.
Jeff Foxworthy aside I would invite anyone to tell me if the majority of people feel it is appropriate to use this word. Gracias por este.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (22) | TrackBack

Concerts & the disabled

Frances Williams of Denver writes:

As a former ardent Denver and Colorado Symphony Orchestra supporter, I should be delighted about the proposal to correct the situation at Boettcher Concert Hall. I am not. Spending $.75, let alone $75 million, would be an absolute waste of taxpayer money.
A symphony concert is an auditory experience primarily. Thanks to the Americans with Disabilities Act, the CSO is required to seat ADA patrons with the general population. As a result, my most recent auditory experiences at the symphony have been punctuated by the relentless mechanical breathing of oxygen machines. In an effort to solve the problem for myself, I have changed seats at intermission and learned that one oxygen machine is enough to pollute the sound in half of the auditorium. I threw in the towel after several concerts that were ruined for me by the mechanized accompaniment: walked out on Van Cliburn, did not renew the seasons tickets that I had held for at least 25 years, and refuse any invitations to attend the CSO.
In general, the Americans with Disabilities Act has been an improvement for the segment of the population to which it applies and no detriment to the able-bodied majority. It has been peripheral in my life. Waiting for a wheelchair to be loaded onto a bus is certainly no big deal. Ramps entering buildings seem common sensical. A section of seats behind glass at Boettcher Concert Hall with unimpaired sightlines and sound for people in need of oxygen would seem to be a workable compromise, except, I am told, to ADA proponents.
I have not consulted a sound engineer, but assume that improving the acoustics in Boettcher will make not only the music, but the oxygen machines, more clearly heard. The federal government mandated the Americans with Disabilities Act. Is the Denver City Council going to mandate $75 million to enhance the irritation of the approximately 175,000 annual attendees at the CSO’s performances? As a taxpayer, I sincerely hope not!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Reporting on gangs

Julie Griffin of Aurora writes:

Would it be possible for you to explain to me why Katie Kerwin McCrimmon found it necessary to include in her article (Rise in gang clashes feared, 6/22/07) the description of the Rev. Leon Kelly’s audience as “older, white Republicans?” She had already identified the group as the “Lincoln Club, the state’s oldest Republican organization.” And as for her use of the comparative ‘older,’ older than whom? You? Me? Cheese? And “white?” Is that an adjective or appositive? Either way, don’t get me started.
And, hey, how about putting a little depth into the article? “There’s so much tension right now,” Katie quotes the Reverend. He is “always concerned because of the violence that is taking place on a daily basis.” Yeah, just like the violence in Iraq, Israel, Afghanistan, etc. Why not do a follow-up interview with the “older, black” Leon Kelly and find out why he claims this level of tension is worse now than at another time, or if he knows of some new element for its cause and if he has any ideas for diffusing it?
And the quote, “Kelly keeps a list of gang-related deaths in Colorado and has added 17 victims this year,” would be much improved with some context.
As written, it doesn’t tell me if that’s more or less than last year at this time or the year before that or the year before the birth of the “older, print reporter” Katie Kerwin McCrimmon.
Look, I’m still young enough to buy green bananas but too old to have my time wasted. I look forward to my morning coffee and paper. I expect substantive, filler-free writing that challenges my intellect. So get on it. You’re burning my daylight.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

The media

Larry O’Neill of Lochbuie writes:

Is Talk Radio running the country? YES but only because newspapers have turned to whatever sells papers. In my eyes newspapers have become slanted in there views of the news they report.
I myself have made numerous submissions that differ with the road the papers seem to be traveling down. Yet on talk radio my opinion for or against is aired shortly after calling. I can also here the opinion of the listening audience which is not owing to an editor. I personally have great respect for someone that provides a outlet for free speech and for some reason is actually dealing with current events that haven’t been dropped from view because some subscribers may not like reading the truth of the issue. One last point America was structured on free speech, and government by the people, if the people don’t like slanted, twisted up, big business leaning reporting of the news, they have the right to protect their freedom in any manor they choose. Politicians must not like finding out that the majority of the peoples view is different from the views of the wealthy and big business that bought them into office.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (24) | TrackBack

The Rocky

David N. Ross of Aurora writes:

My first “upset” (after 40 years, aside from removing some of the better comic strips) with RMN was when you quit printing the complete TV listings on a daily basis. Not a huge problem, but it does require carrying the TV Dial from room to room where, before, we could have a listing in the kitchen as well as in the family room. Now the TV Dial seems to be “somewhere else” whenever we want to refer to it. My second “upset” was recently, when you came out with the compacted format of the TV Dial, which apparently more folk than I find inconvenient. This morning I turned to the Kids’ Page in the center of Spotlight (yep, I’m a 74-year-old kid at heart) to work the Word Search. Not there!! Is it gone forever? I hope not, for it not only is an excellent learning tool for children, it brings me a few minutes of joy each Wednesday morning! Am I the ONLY one among your subscribers who enjoyed it? Aside from the fact that the RMN seems to be taking on more and more the appearance of a sensationalistic “rag,” it seems that we are getting reduced offerings in the paper while paying increasingly higher annual subscription rates. It had been my impression that the Denver News Agency approach was “sold” partially on the grounds of bettering our service and holding our subscription costs down. That doesn’t seem to be happening.
You might discern that I am a more-than-mildly-disillusioned subscriber.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Fuel standards, ethanol, etc.

Peter Zentrich of Aurora writes:

When are Politicians going to learn? The Majority of Voters do not favor any of the current proposals regarding Fuel Efficiency Standards (CAFÉ) and increased use of Bio Fuels. We haven’t forgotten about those bio-fueled vehicles which wouldn’t start when it got cold nor have we forgotten the increased cost to travel 100 miles using E 85. They are impractical and unworkable and no amount of debate is going to change that. There is also the unintended consequence of upsetting our economy. Because of the push for Ethanol as a motor fuel our food prices have been increased and supplies of exportable Yellow Corn and Soybeans have decreased. Also being on a fixed income, (retired), I am very sensitive to these two immediately felt consequences of the current Ethanol program. Additionally, as an investor, I am currently sitting on cash reserves which if left uninvested generate no income for me or taxes for the Government. Though there are more than adequate crude supplies for the near term, the long term is another matter. We have developed technologies and the resources to support them which could solve our long term fuel requirements. These technologies are ready to be implemented today. However due to Congressional talk about new taxes, my plans to invest in an oil company, which was going to build a new refinery, a pipeline company to transport it’s product to market and supply some small amount of venture capital for research and future product development, are currently, like those of industry on hold.
In closing, this is a reminder to our politicians that we do vote our pocket books and the consequences of poor legislation will most assuredly live to at least the next election, if not well beyond.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Motorcycle noise

David Lewis of Westminster writes:

Yes, this is another comment about the motorcycle noise ordinance. I am a responsible, tax-paying citizen (and a Rocky Mountain News subscriber!). I find the open-pipe motorcycles, of which the Harley-Davidsons are the majority, extremely rude. The “Loud Pipes Save Lives” mantra all of these people use is complete bunk. Ask anyone of them who rides in a group where they would rather be, and that is in the front of the pack, where it is quieter. Loud pipes can only be heard when the offending motorcycle passes you, or sits at a stoplight needlessly revving their air-cooled engines. They are not necessary for performance or even appearance. They are only to make the obnoxious statement “I am a rebel. Which is rather funny, since most of these loud bikes reside in residential neighborhoods, owned and ridden by professional people. All of this to bring me to my point. When the city council met, the ONLY motorcycle people the media decided to interview were two guys named “Lumpy” and “Diablo. Do they really sound or look like someone who represents the entire responsible community of motorcycle riders? I don’t think so. I ride a Harley-Davidson-engined sport bike, and it does have an aftermarket exhaust system on it, and it is powerful and sporty sounding, but I never make any attempt to attract attention to myself by needlessly revving my engine. I commute everyday to work on it, and have yet to have a police officer even glance my direction because of my exhaust system. If all of these motorcyclist complain, it is probably because of the expense they will incur by having to change to some other exhaust system. The motorcycle aftermarket will step up and develop different systems that are EPA approved to accommodate everyone, performance and noise-wise, but it will be expensive. You will notice no one with a German or Japanese motorcycle is complaining about the ordinance. Only the obnoxious few who give the rest of us a bad boy reputation.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

President Bush

Marcia Cude of Denver writes:

The arrogance of the president to say that he will have whomever he wants in his Cabinet and that it is his decision to decide who comes and who goes is unbelievable. The decision belongs to the people of the United States. No confidence!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Health care

Steve Schweitzberger of Littleton writes:

Egotistical filmmaker Michael Moore visited my Columbine Memorial building in early 2001. He was disrespectful of my Forty Flags report and my religion. Before the interview I was asked to sign a release form. Before I would sign I asked Michael if his upcoming movie (Bowling for Columbine) would provide, “healing for us and prevention for others". He said yes. He lied.
Media amazes me. I have repeatedly heard Moore use the analogy that fire protection, provided as a socialized necessity, is an example of how medicine should also be socialized. No report about that analogy has brought attention to the fact that most homeowners carry private fire insurance. Although a “fire department” will try to save life and property, and prevent a fire from spreading to the next house, they do not provide compensation for losses.
Most homeowners pay fire insurance as part of their PITI house payment every month. PITI is an abbreviation for Principal, Interest, Taxes, and Insurance. Fire insurance is priced according to the value of the property or the value of the mortgage on a property.
A fire department emergency response might be compared to how a government will respond to a “public health” crisis, but individual medical needs are more comparable to the choices we make for private fire and mortgage protection insurance. We have choices not a government edict.
If Michael Moore has a toothache, it is not my responsibility to pay for his dentistry. If it were, then I would have the right to tell him not to eat sweets. I don’t want that kind of government-paid medical policy. Do you?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Larry Manzanares

Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

The passing of Judge Lawrence Manzanares is a sad chapter in Denver history. Having become acquainted with the judge as a jurist, I found him to be a praiseworthy gentleman in many respects. He was hardly the “criminal” that the local press and prosecution made him out to be. Our thoughts are with the Manzanares family in their sorrow.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Cord MacGuire of Boulder writes:

Everyone has an opinion about how long U.S. forces should remain in Iraq.
After all, it’s a superpower’s prerogative to make these determinations.
A large majority of Americans want our troops out sooner rather than later.
Others, most notably the President, have floated the sobering idea that we might keep significant forces there for more than fifty years.
Divergent views on the issue exist among congressional Democrats. Hillary Clinton, for instance, has allowed that a ten year duration in Iraq feels just about right to her. Meanwhile, our own Mark Udall has endorsed the Baker/Hamilton report’s quiet allusion to an enduring U.S. presence of some 70,000 troops, if only to defend Iraq’s presumedly then privatized petroleum assets.
But, while we dither over these matters, events in Iraq may soon compel what many a Cassandra has long predicted. The insurgents are systematically blowing up every bridge in Baghdad, gradually encircling the increasingly isolated & vulnerable Green Zone. Whatever fatuous timelines may be set in Washington, the insurgency seems to be inexorably moving ahead with its plan to overrun the Green Zone before the enormously secretive new U.S. embassy there is scheduled to open for official business in August.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

June 29, 2007
President Bush & Iraq war

Arleen Feiccabrino of Colorado City writes:

To destroy human life in the hopes of saving human life is unethical.” “I will not use American tax dollars to destroy human life.” These are direct quotes from President Bush. Is he perhaps rethinking his position on the war? Is he planning to end the death and destruction of living breathing human beings with beating hearts who can feel love and suffering? Can it be? No, he is speaking of stem cells that exist in test tubes that will be tossed in the garbage before he allows a bill be passed that would permit use of these cells for research for cures to horrible diseases. Can no one see the faulty logic and hypocrisy in his statements? Does he think less of the real men, women and children who are being killed with his full support and using American tax dollars than he does of cells sitting on laboratory shelves? If he holds true to those words that he spoke in defense of his veto, he would use his position to pull all countries of the world together and work towards understanding and respect and end all wars. He would create armies of humanitarian forces that would be armed with food, knowledge, health care and love and send them to all corners of the world. Truly, to destroy real human life in the hopes of saving human life is not ethical, even less ethical to destroy human life for political gains, or for oil, or for revenge, or for false righteousness. If he holds true to his words, he would end this war and bring our troops home.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (34) | TrackBack

Climate change

George Lilly of Denver writes:

With the summer coming on strong and with it the threat of global warming, it should be interesting to hear what a famous environmental advocate said back in 1969. From Paul Ehrlich as quoted in Ramparts magazine; “Hundreds of millions of people will soon perish in smog disasters in New York and LosAngeles ... the oceans will die of DDT poisoning by 1979 ... the U.S. life expectancy will drop to 42 years by 1980, due to cancer epidemics.” Remember, at that time, the establishment consensus was that we were heading into a “new ice age. It’s certain, that we won’t have a reduction in global warming until we have global government. If we can’t trust the Republicans or the Democrats, what makes us think we can trust a global government? Give me global warming or give me death!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (61) | TrackBack

Mapleton School District

Cherise Callighan of Littleton writes:

For years, the public school systems have been challenged to raise the scores and lower the drop out rate. And for years, the school districts have failed.
Students become bored in class, are not challenged enough or are not given the time and attention they deserve, and need, in order to be successful.
When I was in school, I was merely a shadow on the wall. Sure, I got good grades, but did anyone notice I was bored? Many of my friends and family dropped out simply because the class was no fun and it seemed the teacher did not care. Although I am sure they did, the class sizes were simply too large for the teacher to really get to know the students.
If the teachers had been given the chance to teach in a way the students were interested in, instead of reading directly from a textbook, and in a smaller class size maybe my Freshman class of over 300 would not have only graduated 96? Now is the time for other school districts to take notice in what Mapleton is doing and realize there must be a change. Write your local School District Superintendent now and let them know you support the change Mapleton is making.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

‘Social responsibility’

Russell W. Shurts of Centennial writes:

In a recent letter to the editor concerning universal health care Will Pirkey said, “Our society does not need more personal responsibility, but rather social responsibility.” In fact, this theme is the essential idea behind the current all out effort being conducted by some to provide medical care for everyone through the government. Since this idea is so important to their message let’s look at it in the light of reality. How would a society that practices social responsibility over personal responsibility actually work?
In his letter Mr. Pirkey used a single mom with two kids working two minimum wage jobs as an example of someone who was being ill-treated by those who practice personal responsibility over social responsibility. He believes we all should chip in to pay for or provide the medical care such a single mom needs.
When those who believe in social over personal responsibility come to me for my contribution to this poor woman’s plight I will simply ask, “Why are you asking me to do anything for her? I thought you believed in social responsibility. Why don’t you have society take care of her? Go ask it.”
Indeed, anyone who agrees with Mr. Pirkey can’t honestly ask anyone to do anything, because asking depends on each person being asked to take personal responsibility for meeting the request.
Mr. Pirkey and his brethren don’t seem to grasp that there is no ‘society’ per se and therefore no such thing as ‘social’ responsibility. Certainly there are groups of people who work together, but any such group is ultimately dependent on the actions of each individual person in the group, i.e. each individual taking personal responsibility.
What Mr. Pirkey really wants is not for the single mom and me to work together for a common purpose, but for me to provide for the single mom. He wants those who have succeeded through personal effort to provide for those who have not, and he would not be bashful about pointing the government gun at us to force us to do it.
Please remember; this is the true meaning of ‘social responsibility’ the next time you hear it.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (46) | TrackBack

The Rocky & the Post

Lynn Highland of Morrison writes:

Now that that the Post and the News have crucified Larry Manzanares in the court of public opinion, it is hoped that you will turn your attention with equal zealousness to reporting the criminal activity going on right under our noses, in the current U.S. administration.
Outing a CIA agent, extreme rendition, torture, bungled wars, lying to Congress, illegal spying on American citizens, bogus firing of attorneys, and the murder and death of over 600,000 innocent Iraqis certainly warrants the front-page treatment that you gave the Larry Manzanares case! It is no wonder newspapers are failing — they’re turning into tabloids, fiddling while Rome burns — aiding and abetting the REAL criminals in this world, by failing to garner the courage to report the truth — a duty that is incumbent on the 4th estate. Maybe you should all rethink your mission statement.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Ethanol

Marvin O. Maul of Colorado Springs writes:

In your editorial entitled “Congress should get off ethanol bandwagon, your “ethanol boondoggle” characterization of the headlong pro-ethanol plunge by our President, Congress and environmental groups, as well as a legion of others who should know better, is right on the button.
Additionally, we may be facing the imminent prospect of an ecological and environmental disaster of epic proportions. For the first time in the history of the modern environmental movement, there has never been to my knowledge, a substantive study of the potential for a massive toxic environmental impact following the combustion of ethanol in the millions of tiny combustion chambers in the engines of our millions of automobiles. The possibility of the wide-spread manifestation of toxic side-effects in our human population is enormous, given the absence of environmental impact data showing otherwise.
It is most dismaying to me that scientific benefit-to-risk discourse in such an important matter seems to have been sidetracked by the popular but illusory win/win situation that development of bio-fuels are supposed to be providing us.
I hope that it is not too late for more rational, scientific and economics based inquiry into the real consequences of this misguided effort. The economic damage to our agricultural sector particularly the livestock industry is already being felt, with a lot more in the offing.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Illegal immigrants

Dianne Burchfield of Thornton writes:

I just don’t get it. We don’t want illigal immigrants here, yet we are catering to them. Everything is in two languages, Spanish and English. We are getting more Spanish stations on T.V. The banks are catering to them and on and on. I would like to know how they get approved to buy a house. Here in Thornton we are told that our homes are not single family homes any longer. It doesn’t matter how many people live in a home as long as they are related. How is that proven?
Pretty soon you will be at your local Wal Mart store or any other store for that matter and you will hear, “May we please have an English speaking associate come to Customer Service".

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (20) | TrackBack

Farm Bill

Crystal Espinoza of Fort Collins writes:

Earlier this month I went to Washington DC, with Bread for the World and joined 400 people of faith from 45 states to ask Congress for broad reform of U.S. food and farm policy in order to make progress in the fight against hunger and poverty.
What stands in the way is our current system of commodity payments, which benefit a few wealthy farmers at the expense of many people who really need the help.
In the worlds wealthiest nation, 35 million people including 12% of households in Coloradoare at risk of hunger. The Food Stamp Program, which is part of the farm bill, is our nations first line of defense against hunger. In Colorado, 245,926 people receive food stamp benefits each month — but that’s just 56% of the low-income people who qualify.
This farm bill needs to strengthen the Food Stamp Program so that our country ensures low-income people an adequate, nutritious diet.
In addition, this new farm bill should provide more help for struggling rural communities, which have much higher poverty rates than in cities; help U.S. farmers of modest means earn a sufficient livelihood; and allow small-scale farmers in poor countries to earn their way out of poverty.
The House Agriculture Committee will mark up the farm bill after Independence Day. We are not just running out of time, but also out of excuses. Colorado’s congressional delegation especially Representatives Salazar and Musgrave and Senator Salazar, who are on Agriculture Committees should heed the call for Farm Bill reform.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Stem cell research

Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

It is not true that President Bush is “on the losing side” of the stem-cell controversy, as the Rocky Mountain News would have it. On the contrary, the President is vigorously opposed—as are most Americans who cherish the sanctity of life—to the destruction of human embryos for the sake of “scientific research.” If it is true that human life begins at conception with a single cell, why is it that an embryo, “if only a few days old and no bigger than a pencil point,” is of no intrinsic value? The fact that other more promising research is now available is of no consequence to Democrats, who will stop at nothing to pander to the abortion lobby. The stem-cell bill is a case in point.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (28) | TrackBack

Farm Bill

Julianne Johnson of Arvada writes:

As one of the anti-hunger/anti-poverty activists referred to in the June 18 Rocky Mountain News editorial, Fat of the land, I am happy to see the Rocky highlighting some of the problems with the commodity subsidy title of the current Farm Bill.
The largest 10 percent of U.S. agriculture producers receive 75 percent of the commodity subsidies. Our tax money is not helping many Colorado family farms; in fact, it is helping drive our family farmers out of business.
In addition to neglecting America’s family farmers, the misguided commodity subsidies threaten the livelihoods of millions of poor farmers in developing countries. Twenty million African farmers depend on cotton farming for their income, compared to the 25,000 American cotton farmers who receive up to $4 billion a year in subsidies. This $4 billion is greater than the gross domestic product of Benin, Burkina Faso or Chad.
We have an amazing opportunity right now to urge our representatives and senators to support a Farm Bill that would redirect misguided commodity subsidies into other, underfunded programs. Conservation, nutrition and rural development programs are all funded through the Farm Bill, through direct competition with commodity subsidy money.
By shifting money from commodity subsidies to these other programs, the 2007 Farm Bill can create a system that rewards more of America’s family farmers and gives poor farmers in developing countries a fighting chance to pull themselves out of poverty.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Children’s healt insurance

Sharon R. Bridgeforth of Denver writes:

176,000 kids in our state do not have health insurance. Many of them could get the care they need if Congress reauthorizes and fully funds the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). As this critical issue moves to the Senate floor, we would like to thank Senator Salazar for his commitment to children through his work in the Senate Finance committee.
The faith community represented by Metro Organizations for People offers our encouragement to Senator Salazar to stand firm, accept no less than the $50 billion pledged to SCHIP in the recent budget resolution, ensuring that children will no longer have to use an emergency room as their primary care physician. Further, efforts should also be made to streamline the SCHIP enrollment process.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Smoking

Leroy M. Martinez of Denver writes:

Concerning the nine firefighter killed in a furniture store in Charleston S.C. Is it not sad that this all started because someone took a cigarette break?
Smoking kills. Ban smoking at all working places. I have an area where people smoke and it is littered with cigarette butts. When will people learn to properly extinguish your cigarettes.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

A knife to the heart

When I read Doyla Lundstrom’s letter to the editor in this morning’s Rocky Mountain News (“Still mourning a son lost to sniper’s bullet,” June 14) I felt like a knife went through me.
I, too, have a son deployed in Iraq and I, too, dread the day the news may come that my son has been killed. I agree with Lundstrom that we need to end this terrible occupation in Iraq and bring our sons and daughters home.
My heart goes out to you, Doyla, for your terrible loss. You should not have had to lose your son because of such a poorly conceived invasion and occupation.

Marilyn Mattson, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (17) | TrackBack

Mike Rosen the ostrich

I’m tempted to respond to Mike Rosen’s ridiculous column on the Democratic National Convention (“Let’s not re-create ’68,” June 15) with a Jewish curse he may know: Er zol vaksen vi a tzibeleh, mit dem kop in drerd (You should grow like an onion, with your head in the ground). But to judge by Rosen’s ignorance of historical fact (a government commission called what happened in Chicago in 1968 a “police riot,” unprovoked by the demonstrators) and of the most basic constitutional rights (exercising the First Amendment right to “petition the government for redress of grievances” is hardly “harassing” delegates), not to mention his apparent failure even to read the proposed proclamation, which did no more than commit the city to accord demonstrators the same respect as delegates, apparently his head is already, like an ostrich, stuck in the ground.

Mark Cohen, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (14) | TrackBack

Discarded therapies

In the June 23 Rocky Mountain News, there appeared a column by Sharon Begley about psychotherapy, “Words will never hurt?/Some psychotherapies make matters worse.”
Begley sites two examples of destructive psychotherapy: critical incident debriefing, and the process of “bringing out hidden identities, called alters, through hypnosis” for dissociative identity disorders.
The latter was common practice ... 20 years ago, and the former was popular about 10 years ago. I don’t know any therapists still using these strategies today.
Psychotherapy can be destructive, but it’s more likely destructive when the current standards of practice are not followed.

Michael E. Holtby, Denver
Licensed clinical social worker

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

A DIFFERING VIEW: Court’s defense of free speech selective

Regarding Tuesday’s editorial on the Supreme Court rulings on free speech (“Free speech sanity”): Chief Justice John Roberts, recently appointed by President Bush, was quoted as saying in reference to the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law, “Where the First Amendment is implicated, the tie goes to the speaker, not the censor.”

However, this sentiment clearly did not extend to another ruling issued the very same day. An Alaska high school student was punished by his school district — at an off-campus event, no less — for unfurling a banner that read “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” while the Olympic torch passed by. The high court (no pun intended) ruled that free speech does not extend to the student because the message on the banner conflicted with the school’s anti-drug messages. These clearly inconsistent rulings demonstrate the court’s true fealty, which is not to the freedom of speech but to big-monied interests and the authorities.

Todd Runestad is a resident of Boulder.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (25) | TrackBack

June 28, 2007
Larry Manzanares

Kathie Reinhardt of Englewood writes:

Nice job, Scott Storey and the Jeffco DA’s Office. It isn’t every day that we are allowed to see a character assination displayed before our very eyes. While it may be that Larry Manzanares did, in fact, have illegal possession of a laptop belonging to the City of Denver, the charges brought upon him by the Jeffco DA’s office are excessive to say the least. Furthermore, it is NONE of the public’s business what lays in the 80 page indictment, nor is it anyone’s business if Mr. Manzanares had downloaded ADULT porn.
And THREE felonies? What were the other people who had illegal possession of missing laptops charged with? With the onslaught of these charges, the public humiliation of the excessive information and the medIa’s neverending quest for an extra dime, a fine man now lies dead.
Is everyone surprised at the outcome? You shouldn’t be.
Larry Manzanares was a man who did a lot of good work in this community. He will be remembered by his last few months headlines by those who didn’t know of his excellent reputation…. Thanks, Jeffco DA Storey and the media.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:46 PM | Comments (14) | TrackBack

Congress

Richard Doran of Parachute writes:

We Americans are bombarded daily with “poll results” including everything from the president’s “disapproval rating,” with Bush setting new records, to the “celebrity ego poll,” which Paris Hilton easily won in a landslide.
Over its 70 year history, The Gallup Poll has become one of the most recognized and respected polling sources. However, the recent release of their “confidence in congress” results leaves me with grave concern. How can it be that that the percentage of Americans with a “great deal” or “quite a lot” of confidence in Congress is at 14%? Evaluating poll results involves two necessary considerations - objectivity on the part of the pollster and relevance as to the source of the data. In this case, I do feel that Gallup was fair and impartial because the poor performance on the part of our Congress continues to earn well deserved public disapproval. While the 14% a new all time low, I really question the validity of this outcome.
How could there possibly be a legitimate poll where this HIGH a percentage of Americans would express ANY confidence in our inept legislature.
Without benefit of the polling results, my guess would have been “less than 5%” which would have been a really significant new low.
Who are these “14 per-centers?” What is their source for news? Where do they live? When did they last vote? Are they really American citizens? How in the world can they feel positive toward this “do nothing constructive” Congress?
Since most polls have a “percentage of error” consideration, I’ll speculate that many of these “14 per centers” simply didn’t understand the question.
God Bless America!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:45 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Pollution

R. Kiefer of Arvada writes:

Why shouldnt China, Russia, India or any other nation (China breezes past US as top CO2 emitter, June 22 ) be justified in emitting as much or more CO2, and possibly other pollutants, as the US, since the leader of the free world gives only lip service to conserving and protecting any area of the Earths natural heritage? ( Take heart, Mr. Bush, your citizens still wear the per capita pollution crown. ) My rant is, I suppose, an unfair indictment, since George W. Bush so loves God and His Creation and would undoubtedly do everything he could to protect it if only that wouldnt interfere with the petroleum profits of American companies. His loyalty is commendable but as president of all of the American people misplaced.
Super-scientist Sir Isaac Newtons statement, If I have seen farther than other men, it is because I have stood on the shoulders of giants. explaining his accomplishments, could well be paraphrased by the polluters of the world, who learned their art from George W. Bush’s America.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:44 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

PrideFest

George Lilly of Denver writes:

Another year, another Pridefest! Nobody has ever said what that is of which they are proud? It can’t be what they do in the bedroom or parks, because that produces no children - only sexually transmitted diseases. Isn’t that what being “gay” is all about? Otherwise, they’re just like everyone else.
The emperor has no clothes, but the people still cheer him on.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:42 PM | Comments (75) | TrackBack

Andrews’ response

Angelo Minuti of Lakewood writes:

How comical to read John Andrews response to Jason Salzman’s op-ed piece. By Mr. Andrew’s logic, we are in a period of rising tax hikes.
Because of the economy, we have rising sales tax, rising State Income Tax, rising Federal Income Taxes, rising Personal Property Taxes. In times when the economy is rising and people are benefiting from rising home prices (which may be moderating and therefore real estate taxes will moderate), all taxes are rising.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:41 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Scooter Libby

Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

It is an enigma to many of us why President Bush has not pardoned Scooter Libby, especially in view of the facts that have been revealed in the case.
As columnists Richard Cohen and Christopher Hitchens would have it, there are serious questions which have yet to be addressed. What, for example, constitutes lying? If journalist, Tim Russert and Libby have different recollections about a long-ago conversation, does that mean that Libby was lying and Russert was not? Or, to put in another way, does one’s inability to recall a particular event constitute lying? If that is not the case, then Libby could hardly be charged of a crime. It is one thing to be jailed for a crime. It is quite another thing to be jailed when no crime has been committed.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:41 PM | Comments (28) | TrackBack

Larry Manzanares

Jim Underhill of Greenwood Village writes:

Jefferson County District Attorney Scott Storey, has shown that for a bit of press time and in order to appear on TV, he is willing to vilify and destroy a decent man. The pornography found on the computer Larry Manzanares was accused of stealing was not illegal. Even the trumped up and inflated charges that Storey brought against Mr. Manzanares did not charge any crime relating to pornography. Yet Storey, in his quest to have his 15 minutes in the spotlight, published an 80 page affidavit which contained virtually no information except a catalog of porn — solely to insure that the media would give Storey air time. After all, the alleged theft of a $600 computer where three other governmental decision makers declined to prosecute isn’t much of a case to catapult an ambitious and ruthless DA into the spotlight, is it?
BEWARE when the DA does not care about justice, its time to be looking over your shoulder Jefferson County — you, your child, spouse, parents, or neighbor will be the next victim of a staged media witch hunt, after all, Storey needs the publicity. Come re-election time voters should remember this disgraceful act and vote for someone else.
Remember, “The dead cannot cry out for justice; it is a duty of the living to do so for them.” (Lois McMaster Bujold 2002). Its too late for justice for Larry Manzanares, but its not too late to get rid of a bad district attorney and save his future victims.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:40 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Renewable energy tax credit

Dick Bulinski of Boulder writes:

In the session just ended, our legislature did a fine job of improving our lifestyle. Now, it’s time in the next session to address matters that will further Gov. Ritter’s goal to make Colorado the Renewable Energy Capital of the country.
The Windsor wind turbine plant and the Kremmling beetle-kill wood pellet plant prove that jobs are created for manufacturing and installation of renewable systems, reduce our need for imported oil, and reduce our increases in climate change.
Federal tax laws offer a tax credit of up to 30% of the investment in Solar, Wind, Biomass, etc. as a home improvement (capped at $2,000). At the present time, Colorado provides only a Sales Tax Waiver on an installation. Generally, that incentive is only a few hundred dollars. It’s now time to add a meaningful Tax Credit to encourage more of us to Go Renewable, as the U.S. and many other states already do.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:40 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Motorcycle noise

Steve Harmening of Denver writes:

You printed a letter from a woman in Broomfield complaining about the new standards for motorcycle noise. She mentioned the money bikers spend on accesories and how they might not spend theirs in Denver anymore. In reality it was a transparent, worthless threat that won’t change anything.
As someone who is sick and tired of these thoughtless people disturbing the peace everywhere they go, I say, well don’t shop in Denver and do us a favor and never set your noisy wheels here ever again. You won’t be missed.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:39 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Colorado Ballet

Gil Boggs, artistic director for Colorado Ballet, writes:

In a column concerning Colorado Ballet on Saturday, June 9, Marc Shulgold presented a perspective of the company’s dancer roster that is not quite accurate. I would like to clarify that principal dancer Maria Mosina is definitely not leaving Colorado Ballet, as the column and accompanying photo caption seem to imply. Maria is expecting a baby this fall and during her maternity leave from dancing, she will still be very much a part of Colorado Ballet, teaching classes and otherwise maintaining her presence here. Although she will be missed during the first part of the 2007-2008 season, we are all very happy for her and feel she has certainly earned this opportunity to devote time to her new family.
After a sixteen year career with Colorado Ballet, principal dancer Koichi Kubo made the difficult decision to leave the company when his wife, Mickey, was offered a position with the San Francisco Ballet School. While we will all miss Koichi, we respect and appreciate his sizable contribution to Colorado Ballet’s history and we hope he can return for a proper farewell performance in Dracula.
The reality of the ballet world is that it is very comparable to professional sports. This is a physical profession and a career in the field is relatively short. At the end of each season, every dancer is a free agent again and there will be times when circumstances dictate that a roster must be changed. Injury, family decisions and other opportunities are always possibilities in this field. The dancers may necessarily change, but the goal of the organization never wavers from giving our best and my role as artistic director obligates me to always be prepared to do that. I want to assure our audiences that we’ve acquired some very talented new dancers whose artistry will further the reputation of Colorado Ballet as a nationally recognized dance company.
Thanks to Marc and all the other critics for this past season’s great reviews! I’m confident that our continuing commitment to quality will be evident in our productions this coming season.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:38 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Scooter Libby

James Jones of Littleton writes:

Mike Clow wrote on this page (6/21/07) that Scooter Libby was “dutifully taking the rap for the team, or more precisely for the vice president, for an arrogant act of partisan hackery, the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame.”
Mr. Clow went on to tell us that it is Congressional interest in the good of the country that spares us being dragged through (yet another) impeachment process. Mr. Clow wonders “What happened to all the outrage about the rule of law?” among far right wingers in the face of this lawlessness.
It’s time for a reality check.
Secret Agent Plame was not “outed” by Dick Cheney. Plame was “outed” by former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage in interviews with Bob Woodward and Bob Novak. This fact has been widely reported. Mr. Armitage was not charged with any crime because, as it turns out, even before posing for photo spreads in “Vanity Fair", Plame was not all that secret after all.
The truth is that Mr. Libby faces a prison for obstructing an investigation into a crime that no one has ever been charged with. The facts of the case would make it a bit tricky for Congress to bring impeach charges against Vice-President Cheney.
Mr. Clow’s respect for the rule of law is instructed more by what he terms partisan hackery than interest in the plain truth.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:37 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Climate change

Brian Flynn of Littleton writes:

In their letters of June 25th, Dave Schallert (Proud to be a Denier) and Will Volskis (A Lot of Hysteria on Climate Change) display an outright and willful dismissal of the overwhelming evidence regarding the threat of Climate Change.
In Mr. Schallert’s letter, he says, “as a proud denier of global warming, I will continue to enjoy producing all my carbon emissions and be reminded of Chicken Little every time one of these stupid stories hits the paper.” Mr. Volskis states that, “There is no scientific evidence that we are causing global warming.” The deniers of Climate Change seem to have a disregard for the mountain of evidence documenting that Climate Change is a real threat and that the major crisis we now face is of our own making. The evidence is well-documented in peer-reviewed scientific journals. No legitimate scientist questions Climate Change anymore. They only resistance comes from paid pundits in newspapers and, sadly, our own government.
The problem goes beyond this issue. We live in a time where the gut is trusted more than logic. We live in a time where the media makes it seem like, in every issue, both sides are equally valid. This is not always the case. How can one, being in his or her right mind, deny evidence when it is presented, without legitimate counter-evidence? Sometimes, we must swallow our pride and bow to the evidence, and to the correct conclusion that our capability for rational thought must lead us to.
Why would one knowingly continue wasteful, hurtful behavior? Aristotle reminds us that when the mind knows one action to be good, it will always incline to that action. How could it ever make sense to deny overwhelming evidence in order to continue destructive behavior?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:36 PM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

DPS pension plan not dependent on closures

Letter writer Kathy Hansen is right — we do need to “Keep the heat on Denver Public Schools” (June 12). Yes, DPS needs to make real revelations and reform, but not at the expense of the pension plan.
Hansen has the facts wrong. Schools do not have to be closed to maintain the pension plan. The pension plan, which serves all employees, is separately managed by a professional, and it has professional investment counselors (read the annual report).
DPS makes contributions per employee just like other corporations. All employees can buy “years of service” if certain criteria are met and they pay into those years.
As for releasing personnel information, there are laws preventing this. For the rest, read the DPS annual report. Keep the heat on, but get the facts straight.

Pat Lemster, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Ethanol industry’s ploys Kafkaesque

I applaud the Rocky Mountain News’ position against corporate welfare for corn farmers (“Congress should get off ethanol bandwagon,” June 19). The ethanol industry has provided an almost Kafkaesque assortment of moving targets to justify its extortion of subsidies from the American taxpayer and its solicitation of high tariffs from the American government.
Be it energy independence, unfair competition, national security or whatever excuse happens to suit the industry at the time, the common denominator always lies in finding innovative ways to distort free market forces for the gain of a few (the industry) at the expense of many (American consumers and other businesses).

Dmitry Vilner, Centennial

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Bush two-faced on life

So George W. Bush vetoes the stem cell bill because he believes that it is wrong to destroy potential human life in an attempt to save human lives.
If his belief is genuine, why is he on record as one of the governors who executed the most people on death row?
If he values human life so much, why did we invade Iraq and cause thousands of American and Iraqi deaths for “freedom” and “democracy”? Why is he so intent on losing more American lives for a false premise? Why hasn’t he found Osama Bin Laden? I’m confused.

Camille Accountius, Longmont

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Waiting on the word

I believe that Sen. Wayne Allard hasn’t made a decision on Piñon Canyon because President Bush hasn’t told him what to say yet (“Allard undecided on Piñon Canyon plan,” June 22).

Brad Dale, Wheat Ridge

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Health care wanting

I have never before been a supporter of “socialized medicine,” but we certainly need a major improvement in our health-care system. First of all, get the pharmaceutical companies and health-care providers out of the profit market — that’s totally insane to put profits above the health of American citizens. Additionally, stop providing free care to illegals.
Health care is one of the greatest concerns of most Americans today. I heard a story recently on Good Morning America about Blue Cross of California denying benefits for a young college student going blind.
Our whole country seems to be motivated only by profits at the expense of the average hard-working American. I would like to see the day when the opinions of voting Americans are actually listened to and acted upon.

Barbara Green, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (29) | TrackBack

The sting of Democratic betrayal

The Rocky Mountain News editorial on the Democrats’ utter failure to truly reform earmarks (“Waffling on an ‘earmark’ pledge,” June 15) reminds me of the story of the frog and the scorpion:
The scorpion asks for a ride across the river and the frog hesitatingly obliges. Halfway across, the scorpion stings the frog and, as they are both sinking to their watery deaths, the frog asks the scorpion, “Why did you sting me, knowing that it would kill us both?” The scorpion replies simply, “It’s my nature.”
Raising taxes, wasting money and buying votes is simply in the Democrats’ nature. They know no other way, and it is the height of folly to expect anything from them other than failing on pledges aimed at fiscal responsibility or simple good government.
Democrats are proving once again that the best argument on behalf of Republicans is Democrats.
Until the GOP gives an even better reason to vote for Republicans, however, we may be stuck swimming with political scorpions. Just don’t be surprised when you feel the sting.

Ross Kaminsky, Nederland

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (18) | TrackBack

Time to take back our cities from the gangs

Regarding the June 14 Rocky Mountain News article, “Gangs at City Park Jazz spur officials to action,” how many of us have had our heads buried in the sand, and for how long? This culture of savages has infiltrated the Front Range for a while now (try walking through LoDo some weekend night and see how safe you feel). The gang tags and graffiti scrawls that are appearing everywhere and scarring the appearance of one of the most beautiful cities in the country are appalling.
It’s time to quit coddling these vermin, step up and take it back.
I have to laugh when I hear these pieces of filth talk about their “territory” or read about the stunt they pulled at City Park. I don’t know about the rest of you, but I work to pay my mortgage (or rent), that’s how we stake our territory (home). Not simply by claiming it with a can of spray paint or some cowardly display of numbers to some innocent concertgoers and families. I wish I would have known they would be all together that night at the park doing their little intimidation parade, I would have brought a big net.
Find out what you can do locally in your neighborhood, report gang activity and graffiti ASAP. As for the city governments of the area, please do not overlook this problem any longer, round ’em up, lock ’em up, throw away the keys.

K.J. Munro, Lakewood

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Health care is not a ‘right’; it’s a need

Many Americans claim we need government intervention to reform the unaffordable and inaccessible health care system because “health care is a right.”
The system certainly is a mess, but health care is not a “right” — it is a need, like food and shelter. A “right” is not simply possessing what we need for survival regardless of who provides it; it means the freedom to obtain what we need without force. For example, I should be free to buy soup from whoever offers the best quality for the price. But it would be a violation of my neighbor’s rights to get a law passed making him pay for my soup.
In the same way, a person should be free to purchase health care based on his or her health concerns, but it is not that person’s right to give the bill to taxpayers.
The 208 Commission on Health Care Reform will present a final plan to the Colorado legislature later this year. So far, the four runner-up proposals recommend greatly increased government control of health care access and funding. This means that Coloradans may get some kind of health care, they just won’t have the right to obtain it as they individually see fit. Only a free market can provide that right.

Gina M. Liggett, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (55) | TrackBack

A DIFFERING VIEW: Doctors need to operate in the open, too

Thank you for making my Sunday morning amusing when I read the Rocky editorial “Secrecy and judges.” The opinion that judges should be held to a higher standard is correct. What I found tragically omitted, however, is that other professions are shielded from disclosure as well.

Have you ever tried to look up a physician in Colorado for past grievances? Have you ever tried to actually complain about a misguided (or unethical) physician? Let me tell you, it’s a farce.
Everything is super secret — including the physician’s reply or lack of reply to a complaint. You literally have to have a doctor stand up and say “Yep, I killed him all right” before the board of medical examiners will sanction a physician in this state (and maybe not even then).

Doctors can do whatever they want, whenever they want and there is absolutely no accountability. You think complaints against judges should be disclosed? I submit that a judge may take away your license, your freedom or even your money. But a doctor can kill you without any consequences to his license whatsoever — and live to kill another day.

How about some accountability (and less shielding from liability) for doctors?

Jeanne Moore is a resident of Denver.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

June 27, 2007
Sex ed & family planning

Joe Cooper of Boulder, Population Connection representative, writes:

Salazar should support Comprehensive Sex Ed. On April 23, 2007, a representative from Senator Salazar’s office met with members of Population Connection from his district to discuss the importance of comprehensive sex education and voluntary family planning programs worldwide. I attended this meeting and would like to again urge Senator Salazar to show his support by co-sponsoring the Responsible Education About Life (REAL) Act and by supporting the Global Democracy Promotion (GDP) Act.
Under the REAL Act, the US Congress could set up the first-ever federal funding stream for the purpose of conducting comprehensive sex education programs. The education would be: evidence-based, medically accurate, age appropriate, and broad, providing full information about multiple topics, including both abstinence and contraception.
The GDP Act would prohibit the denial of US funds to overseas groups based on the medical services they provide. It would remove restrictions on funding for voluntary family planning programs, and would help to moderate population growth, reduce poverty, and ease environmental pressures.
Senator Salazar’s constituents that support comprehensive sex education and worldwide access to voluntary family planning services should urge him to co-sponsor the REAL Act and to support the Global Democracy Promotion Act.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:28 PM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Health insurance

Jordan Honig of Arvada writes:

We are planning to vist Costa Rica this year. It is a small South American country that has health insurance for all its people.
Why can a small nation in Central America afford health care for all its citizens and not one of the wealthiest countries in the world?

Posted by denver-admin at 02:27 PM | Comments (32) | TrackBack

Larry Manzanares

H.T. Austin of Denver writes:

Judge Manzanares: An outrageous price, even for an exponent of the veracity of Hick’s gang of Bannock Street Bullies.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:27 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Renewable energy

Kristian Cowden of Aurora writes:

It has been brought to my attention that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has currently put an important energy bill on hold: it is up to Senator Salazar to push for a vote on a renewable energy standard and support 20 % renewable energy by the year 2020. A high school student who knows our stakes in the future of this planet, I believe we have an obligation to ourselves to protect the environment, and I think we should hold our representatives in government to just such an idea.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:25 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Jeffco dog licenses

Jeffco dog licenses
Gail Kirkegaard of Lakewood writes:

My little registered therapy dog would like to protest the new mandatory Jefferson County dog licenses. She’s just a 10-pound miniature dachshund, and already wears a rabies tag, a therapy dog tag and a microchip tag. She’s not likely to get lost with one more tag, because she won’t be able to move!
This should have been addressed by the taxpayers. As a responsible dog owner, I resent being commanded to pay indulgences meant to build the basilica called Table Mountain Animal Center. “When a coin in the coffer rings, a dog from Table Mountain springs!” Last time I looked, a large number of dogs over there are pit bulls and pit bull mix. I think Table Mountain harbors all those refused by Denver shelters. Thank goodness for the shelter’s spay and neuter rule. I wouldn’t want to be any part of the continuation of ill-bred fighting dogs. Also, last time I looked, there are cats at TMAC.
I can’t remember how much I paid to get my dog micro-chipped a few years ago. Will I get to waive the dog license? If any dog of mine were to inconvenience the staff and cost them a dime to help them relocate their owner, I will be obliged to pay that expense in the form of a fee. This does need to be reconsidered. A fee increase makes much more sense than a mandatory license.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:25 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Climate change

Mike Durcan of Denver writes:

A suggestion for those who get upset when anyone challenges the anthropogenic issues of global warming. Contact your preferred matriarch and tell her that those bullies are at it again. I’m sure she will make you some milk and cookies and help you into your jammies for a nice nap with your teddy.
Or you could become concerned about how the millions of true environmentalists will react when they inevitably learn of the fraud behind global warming. Now that could become a true disaster.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:24 PM | Comments (21) | TrackBack

Israel & Palestinians

Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

Ida Audeh’s online commentary, “Israel, a failed state,” is hardly an accurate assessment of the State of Israel. It is, in essence, a lucid illustration of the author’s abject hatred for Israel and the Jewish people. Yet, the Jews are a proud people with a long history and a rich heritage in Palestine. The Israelis also have a right to exist, contrary to what the Palestinians would believe. Audeh’s claim that Israel “denies them any kind of future at all” is not true. On the contrary, the Palestinians have denied themselves a future. The incessant use of violence against the Jewish state is a case in point. Yet, in spite of it all, the Israelis have offered concession after concession, only to fall on deaf ears. The Palestinians are not content to have their own state and live peaceably with Israel. Its aim is nothing less than the destruction of Israel. The facts speak for themselves.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:23 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Police procedures

Leroy M. Martinez of Denver writes:

The Colorado State Patrol has adopted a new policy that states that anyone with any kind of relationship with the victim will not be allowed near the crime area. All this because of a Thornton Commander involved with her nephews accident in which two young men lost their legs. Correct me if I am wrong but even the Thornton Police had this policy in effect way before the commander interfered. They are just not going to enforce their policy that they had already have. So the commander will not be punished. She new she was doing wrong before she helped in the investagation.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:22 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Media’s religious favoritism

Media’s religious favoritism
George Lilly of Denver writes:

Let’s see if we can get itthis understood correctly:
When a “professing” Christian like Leah Daughtry, filled with theological and doctrinal errors, pursues an influential approach to politics, it’s OK with the media (“Pastor’s mission to bring ‘values voters’ into Dems’ flock.” June 1). But when a true, Biblically based Christian pursues an influential approach to politics, it’s met with derision and scorn by the media right? Certainly the latter is likely to be ignored completely, and would never get front-page coverage.
What a bunch of hypocrites the media are!

Posted by denver-admin at 02:21 PM | Comments (31) | TrackBack

President Bush

Andrew R. Lewis of Englewood writes:

There are two kinds of people. Those who revere the Constitution, and those who don’t.
There are those who would join hands on national television to say, “Neither Mr. Gore or I will claim a victory in this election until America is united in its belief that the results are accurate, legitimate, and beyond reproach,” and those who sue to halt the counting of votes. Those who have regard for the will of the voters, and those more interested in other things.
There are those who would willingly relinquish power in January, 2009, and those who might look for a loophole.
There are those who, with regret, will accept that the fun is over, the dream is dead, and it CAN happen here, if Cheney and Bush doesn’t hand over the keys. They will flee their beloved country of birth as refugees from what our government has become, with its hidden torture camps, its lust for conquest, theocracy, raw power over the lives of its subjects, and the souls, governments, and natural resources of the rest of the world.
There will be those who will stay, feeling protected from “terrorists.” And those of us who wish you luck. You’ll need it.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:21 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Grant D. Cyrus of Boulder writes:

Republicans (or should I say these fake Republicans because real ones don’t act in this irresponsible way, and I happen to admire, even respect a few of the real ones and some of their principles) cannot be trusted to do our Geopolitical thinking for us.
One doesn’t just discard diplomacy with disdain and then go about the business of kicking peoples’ doors down in the hopes of winning friends and influencing people as we have in Iraq. When in history has that ever worked? Afghanistan was truly a different story. It was justified and even honorable to go after the insane Taliban. But then someone we know who, just had to get dirty greedy and put us on this hellish road in Iraq. Faulty intelligence indeed! It’s tragic.
I see more and more letters to the editors across the country with people calling for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney and then throwing in Rumsfeld for prosecution for crimes against the country. I think I’d go along with that. If this is to actually happen though it will take a new Independent/Democratic administration in 577 days, 6 hours and 17 minutes from now. Democrats, Independents, the Politically/Intellectually Integrated and others who just want the madness stopped MUST find more patient faith and strength in the Congress as they are doing everything within their power I believe. But then that’s another story.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:15 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Fearless leader

I was amazed that the president fearlessly waded into a throng of Albanians. Why does he never appear before a group of U.S. citizens? The only time I see him in a public forum he is always backed up by a group of military personnel. It must be painful to be a prisoner in the White House.

George Couchman, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (42) | TrackBack

Simple solution

In view of local and congressional opposition to the expansion of the Fort Carson training area in Piñon Canyon, there is a simple solution.
The Army should announce that it will immediately begin phasing down operations at Fort Carson with the objective of closing the installation in five years.

Helmuth Froeschle, Lakewood

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Blame shouldn’t be shared equally

H.D.S. Greenway’s column June 6, “The Palestinian cage,” is so shallow.
Both sides are contributors, continuing violence, blah, blah, blah. It is total ignorance of the facts.
Compare the content of Palestinian newspapers, children’s TV shows, school textbooks, and news shows to the content of Israeli papers, books and shows. Palestinian children watch a Mickey Mouse character teach jihad.
Their school books show maps of Israel and call it Palestine. Mosques are at the center of extremism, preaching martyrdom and hatred.
Children are sent to summer camps to learn to be suicide bombers. The elected government of the people wants Israel destroyed. A culture of hatred against Israel has developed in Palestinian society for the last 60 years (long before the “occupation” started).
These two sides are not equal in who is responsible for the level of violence. There is no equivalence on the Israeli side of this kind of incitement. Did Greenway forget this or just think it did not matter?

Debra Zinik, Englewood

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (15) | TrackBack

Why blame Bush for Clinton’s failure?

The Rocky Mountain News included the following assertion in its story of June 11, “Denver targets global warming”: “Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels, frustrated with the Bush administration’s opposition to ratifying the international Kyoto treaty on emissions, began the effort two years ago.”
Assuming that a competent reporter is capable of doing research, it is public record that President Clinton was the one who refused to submit the Kyoto Treaty to the Congress for ratification; the reason being that the Congress overwhelmingly passed a resolution to the effect that they weren’t willing to give up U.S. jobs for an unfairly applied set of restrictions that penalized the United States.
I’d be curious to learn why the Rocky blamed President Bush for the problem. But I am aware that it seems to be a common form of dishonesty that seems to be justified on the left as “the right thing to do.”
Frankly, I moved from the Front Range because it was becoming absurd. A little more silliness about Denver-area restrictions on everything but population shouldn’t hurt its image much more. But are these lip-service “fixes” going to do much other than give newspapers something to print? It’s doubtful.

Mike Sigman, Durango

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (24) | TrackBack

Ute Creek teachers expect full payment

I appreciate that the Rocky Mountain News was able to alert the public to the situation faced by the students of the former Ute Creek Secondary Academy (“Charter school’s demise leaves students in lurch,” June 15).
I was a teacher at Ute Creek. I wish my former students all the best as they consider options for next year.
I would like to point out that neither the charter school’s former board nor the St. Vrain Valley School District had any contingency plan for paying the teachers.
I met with all of the teachers and the St. Vrain human resources department on the 13th of this month. They offered us 60 percent to 100 percent of one month’s pay of the two remaining as per our contracts.
I appreciate some breathing room, but I also expect to be paid in full for a job well done. We all do!

Tug Levy, Rollinsville

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Stop the bickering

If you want partisan bickering — both at the citizen level and congressional level — look no further than the immigration legislation.
It is easier to call the legislation and its supporters racist or supporting amnesty or that “they just don’t get it,” than trying to negotiate a solution to a problem as complicated as immigration.
The legislation has the support of President Bush and some members of Congress, who should be respected for trying to negotiate a workable solution to the complicated problem of immigration as opposed to name-calling.

Louis Lieb, Golden

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (33) | TrackBack

Make designers fix it

So Boettcher Hall is an acoustical albatross (“Decision on bond projects delayed/Doubts over fixes for Boettcher hall prompt move,” June 16). That’s no news. Who designed it? Who approved and paid for the design? And who paid for its construction?
Once again the taxpayer will be asked to pour more money into it? I think not.
I suggest that we back up and go after those who are responsible for creating the albatross rather than sock it to each and every local property taxpayer.

Jim Bahrenburg, Wheat Ridge

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

June 26, 2007
Larry Manzanares

Leroy M. Martinez of Denver writes:

Conerening ex judge Larry Manzanares. I wonder if he killed himself because he felt bad about the recent trouble with the laptop or because he has sent many people to jail and now he might be going to jail and face them?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:34 PM | Comments (16) | TrackBack

Larry Manzanares

Larry De Cicco of Evergreen writes:

Public Trust; it’s a double-edged sword, isn’t it? When Nixon got caught planning and abetting breaking and entering, dirty tricks, and other violations of the Public Trust, he seemed to believe that his position would exempt him from scrutiny. Quite indignant about it, as I recall.
Today, Nixon, Jr., is doing the same thing by pushing to endanger the middle class through amnesty and not going after the employers who hire illegals, but who give campaign contributions. It seems a clear violation of the Public Trust; that is, if you consider the public to be those who can legally vote.
Now we have a Denver judge who stole public property, got caught, and committed suicide rather than to live with the consequences of his flawed decisions. The RACISTS (LARAZA) and other defenders are saying that his problem was over-prosecution of his crime or too much publicity, or that because Hispanics are breaking the laws, people are now racist for holding them accountable . People who seek the Public Trust need to be held to a higher standard. If they cannot stand up to it, it is their choice not to serve. But once in office, you cannot blame the light of public opinion if the person has become a cockroach, uncomfortable with their actions being exposed.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:33 PM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Larry Manzanares

Bill Geist of Denver writes:

People are claiming that Larry Manzanares was driven to suicide because of the media coverage. Question, was Larry Manzanares a member of the media or was he just a member of society? If he was a member of the media, he would have been accorded some respect and only the pertinent facts would have be reported, whereas being just a member of society, the media is doing what they do best which is to sell the story. They do this by laying out his complete life story, whether or not the facts are germane to the story. The problem with this is that society gobbles up this kind of sensationalistic and bombastic story like a drug. The subject of the story is then crucified and vilified by the public because of these sensational and bombastic stories.
The media has an “Us and Them” mentality; fellow members of the media will be accorded respect and only the pertinent facts will be reported, everyone else will have their life story published regardless of the facts and whether or not the information is relevant to the story. Case in point, in September 1990, Wendy Bergen, a reporter for Channel 4 News, did a story about the local underground of pit bull/dog fights. Jefferson County did their investigation and found that she help stage/coordinate the dog fight. She was indicted for perjury for lying to the grand jury on three different occasions regarding her involvement with the dog fight. The two dog handlers were also charged and convicted for their involvement but the interesting thing is the way this story was covered. The public was given all kinds of information regarding the dog handlers but only the pertinent facts regarding the investigative reporter were given to the public. Her privacy was respected but the privacy of the handlers not respected. A very clear case of the double standard the media uses.
At the end of the day, the media will do whatever is necessary to sell the story. They will manipulate the facts so that they can sell the story in the most sensationalistic and bombastic manner possible. Larry Manzanares was just another victim of this hypocrisy.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:32 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Immigration

Cydny B. Norris of Lakewood writes:

Like many Americans, I am heartily sick of the immigration debate. New laws and expensive walls are not what we need. If an individual or a family is here illegally, they should be deported immediately. The total cost of their deportations should be charged to their country of origin. Since Mexico and other countries are not likely to reimburse us for the amount, we should withhold the cost of the deportations from the financial aid we send to them. I believe those governments would begin policing their own borders if they had a financial incentive to do so.
There are many immigrants who work hard to become Americans, who appreciate what this great nation can do for them and their families and they contribute to our society as a whole. Their dedication and industry are welcome and respected. English is indeed a difficult language to learn, and I have immense respect for those non-native English speakers who put forth the effort. We don’t ask that you speak perfect English, but that you make an attempt.
Finally, the most successful immigrant groups had a profound respect for education. They encouraged their children to take advantage of the educational opportunities this country has to offer. Schooling was rightly seen as the foundation on which to build success. I am saddened to see this tradition fall by the wayside while immigrant groups insulate themselves in their own cultures and reject what America has to offer.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:31 PM | Comments (44) | TrackBack

Health insurance

Mary Schumacher of Denver writes:

There really is no excuse in a country like America for people to be dying for lack of insurance. Almost anyone can be helped by modern medicine but only if you can afford it and that just isn’t right.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:30 PM | Comments (28) | TrackBack

Stem-cell veto

Steve Tanberg of Denver writes:

Sen. Clinton’s criticism of President Bush’s veto of the stem cell research bill was interesting. She stated this is just another example of the President putting ideology ahead of science. Thank God we have leaders who put ideology over science. Adolf Hitler and Josef Mengele didn’t when they did human experiments on Jewish and other children.
Perhaps Hillary mis-spoke, but I’ll bet she doesn’t apologize, and I’ll bet the main-stream media doesn’t hold her to account for this bizarre statement.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:29 PM | Comments (32) | TrackBack

Sex education

The Rev. Bill Carmody of Colorado Springs, director of Respect Life for the Diocese of Colorado Springs, write:

There is a big uproar at Boulder High School. Many parents were outraged about the so-called experts to encourage students to experiment with illegal drugs, sex etc.. They claimed that students will do it anyway so you might as well experiment and enjoy it. People like O’Reilly and Calpis and Silverman have dedicated a huge amount of air time to this issue and their outrage about encouraging such behavior. I find what the experts said was very refreshing. Finally, someone honestly shows what they believe about our young people. Namely, our young people have no self-control, and we need to teach them to be ok with no self-control.
Where was O’Rielly , Calpis and Silverman and Parents when the State of Colorado promoted “Comprehensive Sex education over abstinence based education? Comprehensive sex education is code for young people have no self-control and they are going to do it anyway. No different than what the experts in Boulder stated. I for one applaud the experts in Boulder. They at least are honest in their assessment of our young people. House bill 1292 makes school district like Boulder Teach young people that they have no control over their bodies and need to use contraception to prevent pregnancy and use condoms to prevent disease. HB 1292 dismisses local control and the great strides that abstinence education has made in the past 15 years. HB 1292 was supported by Planned Parenthood and give a monopoly of ideas to Planned Parenthood. The only difference between the bill sponsored by Todd and Windels and the experts in Boulder is that Todd and Windels are smart enough and have the political savvy not to be honest about what 1292 will do to our Children and how little they think of our young people.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:29 PM | Comments (40) | TrackBack

Health care

Ashley Kingsley of Denver writes:

Why are we so far behind in our health care services? Why does big business run everything, including war? Why do poor people get turned away and rich people get care? Why does our Country totally fail at the really important things - such as HEALTH, WELLNESS, WELL BEING, QUALITY OF LIFE? We are so very far behind - and we just don’t need to be. There is enough for everyone. If we can take the greed out of some of the things that shouldn’t have $$$ dollar bills attached to them we would be way better off.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:28 PM | Comments (36) | TrackBack

Israel & Gaza

James Bowen of Boyero writes:

Israel controls the water, electricity, roads in and out, the air space and the coast in Gaza.” The murderous regimes in Tel Aviv and Washington D.C. also control the money the Palestinian government needs to function. The criminal Israeli government also controls members of the Palestinian Parliament that the Israeli Defense Forces kidnapped. You have to believe the chaos in Gaza is exactly what Olmert and Bush wanted. Remember it was the IDF that destroyed the Palestinian Security Forces and then the government complained when they could not control the “terrorists. What hypocrites! The real enemies of democracy are George W. Bush and Prime Minister Olmert and others of their ilk.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:27 PM | Comments (21) | TrackBack

Piñon Canyon expansion

Christy Grasmick of Las Animas writes:

An unprecedented victory for land owners came this past week as Democrat Congressman John Salazar and Congresswoman Musgrave fought the US Army to save Pinon Canyon. The Musgrave/Salazar amendment to a Military spending bill literally may have saved the livelihood of farmers and ranchers in S.E. Colorado. Thank you to both Congresswoman Musgrave and Congressman Salazar for standing up for the people of Colorado.
Now those very lives are in our Senators hands. Will they do the right thing as the Congresswoman and Congressman have done and support their state and their constituents? Or will they shame their brothers (literally) and sisters and the people that elected them to office? They can stand up for what’s right or they can turn away – if the Musgrave/Salazar amendment isn’t carried through the Senate then we will all know their true loyalties.
But we know they can do it. When Republicans and Democrats work together things can get done. Take this past weekend when Marilyn Musgrave (Republican) and John Salazar (Democrat) joined forces to stop the land grab by the Army. It is good to see our representatives working together for the good of Colorado. I encourage our other representatives to follow the lead of Salazar and Musgrave.
I also wanted to say a quick Thank You to Congresswoman Marilyn Musgrave.
The Congresswoman has worked very hard to be in touch with her constituents and it has shown. Marilyn is easily one of the most accessible representatives we have in Colorado. Regardless if you are a Republican, a Democrat, or a Green Party, Marilyn and her staff are always willing to listen and do what they can to help you out. I for one appreciate her effort to do so.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:26 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Connect the dots

It’s not very difficult to connect the dots after two oil tycoons took office and gas prices have gone up about 200 percent! Not to mention the largest corporate profit in the world’s history was taken by none other than ExxonMobil, while citizens continue to get gouged at the pumps!

Jeff Darden, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (39) | TrackBack

Do-nothing GOP reps are hypocrites

So, the Republicans in Congress think that the no-confidence resolution for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales was just a big waste of time. “This is a nonbinding, irrelevant resolution proving what? Nothing,” said Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss. “Maybe we should be considering a vote of no confidence on the Senate or on the Congress for malfunction and an inability to produce anything.”
This is funny considering the six years of a Republican-controlled Congress under President Bush that ignored its responsibility to provide “checks and balances” on the administrative branch. Congressional Republicans keep promoting the ideal of a democratic society in Iraq, but turn a blind eye to this administration’s attack on democracy in our own country.
Along with the well-known controversies, Congress should also be debating the vote caging (removing valid voters from voting rolls due to mass-mailing tricks, which was mentioned in the hearings on the U.S. attorney firings) by the Republican Party, or Bush’s plan to control all three branches of government in the event of another attack on U.S. soil (National Continuity Policy, signed May 9).
Which is more important, Mr. Lott? Impeaching President Clinton over lying about an affair, or debating the issue of an independent judiciary?

Mark A. Seberger, Larkspur

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (55) | TrackBack

Rocky eminently fair in Manzanares stories

Here we go again. Larry Manzanares was a good, decent man. He messed up. He happened to be a judge who knew exactly what he was doing when he allegedly stole property, downloaded porn and lied. He also knew better than the average citizen the penalties he would face if caught. Now, because he was Latino, the prosecutors and the Rocky Mountain News are not only accused of racial bias, but are responsible for his death. No one has mentioned the turmoil, disappointment and embarrassment he may have faced at home.
This comes down to the fact that everyone is responsible for his own actions.
If one cannot face up to the consequences of breaking the law and the publicity that follows, then that’s his choice, regardless of race, religion or social position. The Rocky was more than fair in presenting all the commendable aspects and achievements of Manzanares and his positive influence over the years.
Though we grieve for this man whom we believe could have recovered in time with the support of family and friends, we will continue to support the Rocky Mountain News. Larry Manzanares chose his own fate.

Holly Bjornsen, Parker

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Proud of coverage?

John Temple’s From the Publisher column on Saturday spoke of his pride in the extensive coverage the Rocky Mountain News has done in many articles recently.
It made me think of the Rocky’s extensive reporting on the Larry Manzanares case, where there were pages of stories and his picture filling much of the front cover of the Rocky, for an alleged theft totaling less than $2,000.
In light of his suicide, I wonder if Temple is proud of this coverage, too?

Francie Miran, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Sanctuary Denver

Mayor John Hickenlooper insists that Denver isn’t a sanctuary city, yet I would argue that many of the gang members in the city are illegal aliens.
The police are perfectly capable of reporting them to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, if they had the political will to do so.
The House appropriations bill passed recently for the Department of Homeland Security includes a provision that prohibits Homeland Security funds from being distributed to states and localities with sanctuary policies in place. Denver needs to review its approach to criminal illegal aliens, including known gang members, residing in the city.

Rhonda Roseto, Westminster

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (16) | TrackBack

Nursing mothers? Man the breastworks!

I couldn’t help but react to an item on the nine o’clock news recently (June 14). It mentioned a woman with a 5-month-old baby who had the audacity to nurse her hungry child in public, at the Elitch Gardens Water Park. Outrage! The offended public immediately brought this seditious act to the attention of management. No one must be subjected to the image of a mother nursing her baby!
What a bunch of hypocrites!
How many of those offended people were spilling out of their skimpy tops? I am offended daily by the latest rage — show your cleavage if you work at the bank, if you are shopping, if you are at church. I have written letters to my bank where the tellers dress as if they are clubbing.
Nobody pays any attention to those of us who are offended by the assault of overexposed mammary glands, unless of course someone is using them for the purpose they were intended.

Marie Bowman, Lakewood

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Good riddance to cop-killer McVean

Jason McVean’s body (along with bombs) has been found and it appears he committed suicide (“9 years later, search over in killing of Cortez officer/Remains believed to be 3rd gunman in 1998 slaying,” June 7).
I hope he suffered. He and his fellow terrorists, Alan Pilon and Robert Mason, murdered Cortez police office Dale Claxton in 1998. Claxton was not some “dirty” cop; he was a good, honest man who had a family. Claxton was not harassing the three men, he merely pulled over a stolen water truck. For doing his duty, McVean, Pilon, and Mason shot him 19 times before Claxton could leave his patrol car.
These three terrorists have their own rooms in hell. I hope they are tormented for eternity. The rooms next to them are reserved for the right-wing “law and order” wackos like G. Gordon Liddy who called these men “heroes.” At the time, the right-wing talk shows were all abuzz with comments about how McVean, Pilon and Mason merely carried out their “mission” incorrectly, not mentioning that stealing or, much less, murder, is wrong.
Claxton should be remembered as an honorable man who died doing his duty. If the three murderers had been from the Middle East, everyone would know Claxton’s name. But because McVean, Pilon and Mason were white and “Christian,” the slain officer has become a footnote. It is very sad to say that most forget (and even sometimes confuse) the heroes of our country. It is equally sad to say that sometimes terrorists are home-grown.

Christopher Thiry, Golden

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

June 25, 2007
Gen. Peter Pace

Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

It is disappointing to hear that Gen. Peter Pace has not been reappointed as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He has served this country as an exemplary soldier for many years in time of peace and in time of war. It would appear that the “circumstances” leading to this decision are politically motivated and nothing more. It seems likely that the dismissal is predicated on his comments to the Chicago Tribune last March, when he told the truth about homosexuality and its implications on military life. If this is indeed the case, the decision to dismiss Gen. Pace is a blight on the Bush administration and its attempt to preserve morality in the armed forces.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:45 PM | Comments (20) | TrackBack

Immigration legislation

Stephen H. Cohn of Northglenn writes:

On October 26, 2006, President Bush signed the Secure Fence Act. The bill called for a 700 mile boarder fence to be built along the Mexican boarder similar to the seccessful San Diego fence. It also called for several other border security measures, and $1.2 billion was pledged to partially fund the project. Since the signing only 11 miles of fencing has been built. The amount of promised fencing has been reduced to about a third of the original 700 miles.
After the 2006 election, several Democrat members of Congress proclaimed that fencing part of the bill would never be completed, and the President has all but abandoned the pledges of the original bill. Now, the President and several members of Congress want a new immigration bill that instantly gives people here illegally a right to stay. The bill also promises better boarder security if the whole bill is passed.
The question is can any of these politicians be trusted to secure the border after more than 12 million people here illegally are allowed to stay. The border was not secured after the 1986 amnesty, and the promises of President Bush and the current Democrat Congress are unreliable because of past failures.
The only action that is fair to legal immigrants, those applying to become legal residents, and citizens is a certified secured border prior to giving a pass to anyone here illegally.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:45 PM | Comments (28) | TrackBack

Tibet protest at game

Hans Hartman of Evergreen writes:

During last Sunday’s soccer game between the Colorado Rapids and the national Chinese team, a group of spectators were handcuffed and removed from the stadium after unrolling a Free Tibet banner. Your article quotes an ACLU member saying that private organizations can make their own rules, indicating Dick’s Stadium had a legal right to do so.
I was seated in the same section where this all happened. The event raises some unsettling questions:
1. I am not a legal expert, but there must be some boundaries as to what rules a private organization can make. E.g., I assume they can’t simply ignore the legal drinking age and make it legal for 12-year-olds to drink alcohol on their premises. But if that’s the case and they can’t make these types of rules, why are they allowed to replace a constitutional right (freedom of speech) by their own rules? If any legislation should *not* be allowed to be overturned by private organizations, it should be our constitution!
2. From what I could see, police officers removed the folks with the banner, not Dick’s Stadium employees. So the police now enforces a private organization’s rules that violate a constitutional right? I think we’re on slippery slope here.
3. I can’t help seeing the irony of this little episode. I assume that one of the demonstrators’ grievances with the Chinese regime in Tibet is that they violate freedom of speech there. Dick’s Stadium, assisted by the police, then does the same against these demonstrators in our own country.
Come on, we should do better than that!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:43 PM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

DPS pension

Ted Brucker, John Jackson, Carolyn and Gary Martyn, Barbara Piascik, Jo Ann Rivera and Bennie Williams write:

Re: “Teachers Flock to Defend Their Pension June 7, 2007

As retired Denver Public School teachers we are well aware of the problems that DPS faces as it confronts falling enrollment and rising costs. We applaud the creation of A+ Denver, an independent community group organized to evaluate school performance and district resources. However, we were surprised to discover a proposal by A+ Denver to restructure our retirement plan. We were upset when we saw that only selected facts were being cited to support such a restructuring - and many of these facts were either misstated or only partially true. Most disturbing was the attempt to denigrate the pension plan managerial staff and board of trustees by simply ignoring that they have maintained our fund with a high degree of competence and professionalism. The document even suggested that the pension fund managerial staff and board of trustees be replaced.
Many thanks to David Milstead and Nancy Mitchell. Milstead, your excellent business reporter, is intimately acquainted with the Denver Public Schools Retirement System (DPSRS). Your education reporter, Nancy Mitchell, is well acquainted with the ins-and-outs of the Denver Public Schools. On June 7th Mr. Milstead and Ms. Mitchell published an article that laid out the positions of both sides. Not only did Milstead and Mitchell help clarify the A+ Denver proposals and the opposing position of the DPSRS, but they provided much needed transparency.
We cannot stress this last point enough. The community needs the assurance that all relevant facts are “on the table” and the entire decision making process is open to public scrutiny. As Justice Brandeis once said about the democratic process, “Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants.” Mr. Milstead and Ms. Mitchell have provided some much needed “sunlight.” We trust that the Rocky Mountain News will continue to follow all future plans and negotiations.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:37 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Gang violence

Leroy M. Martinez of Denver writes:

Finally, Mr. Bill Johnson news columnist hit the nail on the head when his column in RMN stated that gang violence will not be resolved with police but rather start at home. This is concerning young Mr. Justin Box killed another person then bragged about it. Now his is crying in a courtroom pleading for mercy. What about Mr. Robert Lee. He will never get a chance to do anything. If you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime. I see many young people acting tuff on the streets. But when they are in the courtroom, they are crying like babies.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:36 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

President Bush

Ron Rizzo of Littleton writes:

If Abraham Lincoln was the best Republican president, then George W. Bush is the worst, or the last. He’s working assiduously to achieve that distinction.
Politics, dependent on money, Republicans are coming up bupkis. A Democrat somewhat funded can take any office in 2008.
Erasing Ronald Reagan and the tireless work of a few broadcast commentators, Bush is bringing down the house and for what, cheap labor and his Latino nephew Preston’s political future.
Bush is doing more for the fortunes of Democrats in 2008 than the networks and Hollywood put together. Bush is doing more for Democrats than Herbert Hoover.
Rank and file Republicans are distressed with “trickled on” economics. Too many Republicans, proud self-employed painters, roofers, framers are being replaced by illegal aliens. Welcome to the Bush Revolution.
According to a study by the Heritage Foundation, for every one dollar of taxes paid by illegals, they receive in tax-financed services, three.
The bad news is local party organizations are broke. To the chortling delight of Ted Kennedy there is no candidate to challenge Ed Perlmutter in the Seventh. A Paula Noonan, with unlimited funding, could easily pick off Republican Jim Kerr in HD 28.
Thanks to the Bush wrecking machine, the amazing Kerr will be personally funding his own race.
Republicans not speaking out against Bush for fear of violating Reagan’s 11th Commandment may be in a violation of the other ten, not to mention committing political suicide.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:35 PM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Candidates

Richard Taylor of Littleton writes:

A few questions about the qualifications of some of our politicians.
What qualifies Slick Hilly to be our president when her husband, Slick Willie, is one of the two presidents ever impeached, and she tried, and failed, to socialize the medical profession in this country?
What qualifies our tobacco baron, Alfonce Gore, to be so knowledgeable about global warming? Does he have a doctorate in Climatology or, as is broadcast on TV, an undergraduate degree in Bible? Is he really retarded or does he just look that way?
If Ketchup Kerry was born at Fitzsimmons General Hospital he must be an Army Brat. Was his Father a private or a general? What qualifies him to criticize our country when he is more of less proven to be an unqualified liar?
Just wondering.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:35 PM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Ethanol

Robert Lipton of Lakewood writes:

Panacea or Pandoras Box: Ethanol Reverberations are increasing from the corngrowers and environmentalist ethanol fiasco. Major oil companies are rethinking plans for increasing or building new refinery capacity in reaction to congressional fiats for more use of ethanol. This will insure high gas prices for years. When added to the problems already extant from corn based ethanol production, i. e. higher food prices, greater pollution,increased use of water resources , greater health risks and taxes to subsidize the production; it is becoming more and more evident that ethanol is not a panacea but a Pandora’s Box.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:34 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Heart Walk noncoverage

Fred Greeb of Lakewood writes:

On June 2, I participated in the Denver Heart Walk, a fundraiser for the American Heart Association. A crowd of more than 7,000 walked a 5-kilometer loop from the Denver Performing Arts Center to Lower Downtown and across the South Platte River before returning to the finish line at the performing arts center.
I have searched the news for a mention of the event and was dismayed that not one of the mainstream Denver media saw fit to even mention it. This was a large group of volunteers whose only desire was to raise money to help in the fight against heart disease, the No. 1 killer in the country, and to show support for those who have had to deal with the disease and its effects.
It seems that the media have their priorities in the wrong place. I find it appalling that a protest group, small or large, for whatever cause, with waving signs and shouted demands, can get front-page or lead-story news coverage while an enthusiastic gathering for a charitable cause gets ignored. Perhaps next year the walk route will take us past the media offices and they will notice this event.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:33 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Hurting farmers

Kathleen Beaver (no hometown provided) writes:

It is unbelivable what Gov.Ritter and our government in Colorado is doing to the farmers in Northeastern Colorado! I am so sick of going to the grocery store and finding produce grown in Mexico or some other forign country( who knows what they use to grow it with) For 30 yrs we have gone out to Brighton every summer to buy fresh produce, food grown in the United States! Yet, you will not let those farmers use their wells. Unbelievable! The Mile High Flea Market in Commerce City is known all over the U.S. and has been a positive draw for our state for so many years. Have you been there lately? Most of the time you would think you are traveling in Tiajuana. Frequently they give a sales tax announcement in English only. Every other announcement is in Spanish but not this one! I guess they dont pay sales tax like us gringos. The management at Mile High is forcing the white dealers to quit by their treatment of them. Unbelievable! The city of Thornton has approved a new shopping center for the heart of old Thornton, anchored by a Mexican Super Market. I give it a month and they will turn it into a trash bin, grafitti everywhere and you will see them changing the oil in their cars in the parking lot! Just take a look at our Wal Mart and you will see what I mean. Unbelievable! We, the longtime, legal, taxpaying, law-abiding citizens of this state which we all love so dearly, have elected city and state officials who are taking away our way., our culture and our morals and are giving it away. Unbelievable.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:31 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Hamas & Gaza

Dave Petteys of Roxborough Park writes:

Progressives are quick to embrace the concept of “Equal Validity", which holds that our Western view of the world is NOT the only one, and that we have no right to think ours is superior, nor to impose it on others. The Progressives apply this to Democracy, and hold that Democracy and freedom may not be “suitable” in the “Middle East". They are quick to turn over the people in this region to the mercies of the beheaders and torturers.
Now let us consider Gaza. HAMAS has just announced the “establishment of Islamic rule and justice". Their first official act has been to draw up a death list of hundreds of Al Fatah to be murdered. Yet the Progressives are calling for “humanitarian aid” for the 1.5 million people in Gaza! But is not their care and feeding the primary responsibility of the local government, which is now HAMAS? There have been Middle Eastern despotisms for 7,000 years! How can the Progressives now call for caring of the poor and feeding the starving when this is no more than “imposing Western (Christian) values”
which supposedly are no better than any other? Are we not interfering with a process that has been in place for millennia? The bottom line is that humanitarian aid lets HAMAS off the hook in meeting its primary responsibility to care for the people under its control. HAMAS is thereby freed it to continue to devote its resources to conduct Jihad on Israel and the West, not a good thing. I say no aid and let HAMAS meet its responsibilities. Let the world see what"Islamic rule and justice” really look like.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:30 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

American janjaweed

Lynn Highland of Morrison writes:

In reading about your coverage of the school children raising money for Darfur, the divestment of Colorado state funds from those companies doing business with Sudan, and the general public condemnation of the genocide occurring there, I’d like to acknowledge the well-intentioned efforts of caring people, such as Peter Groff of our State legislature who have spearheaded this effort - it’s a truly worthy cause.
However, how is it that the United States of America differs from the Janjaweed, the muslim militia group who with the sanction of the Sudan government kills, rapes, and displaces the people who have fled to Darfur? We have maimed, killed, destroyed and brutalized the people of Iraq through our invasion and occupation of their country, a country that never attacked us first, an invasion for which the president felt he could lie and deceive us into. Does it make us feel better to take up the cause of Darfur and disavow and ignore the fact that we, the United States of America have caused over 2,000,000 refugees to flee Iraq, condemning them to live in abject poverty and have been responsible for the deaths of 600,000 more? The Janjaweed and Sudan have blood on their hands—so do the American people. We should be working harder to end the horrendous occupation of Iraq, and only then, might we reclaim the moral ground to condemn others their evil deeds.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:30 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Colorado, too, should push for limits

Cheers to Colorado state Senate President Joan Fitz-Gerald and House Speaker Andrew Romanoff for supporting cuts to global warming pollution from motor vehicles (“Colo. lawmakers support Calif.’s push for emissions limits,” May 30). The EPA should approve California’s waiver and the right for states such as Colorado to address this important problem.

Colorado is already feeling the effects of global warming, and is predicted to be affected in the future. The effects of global warming on the Rocky Mountain West include declining snowpack, increasing risk for wildfire, and longer and more severe droughts.

Colorado’s communities depend on deep mountain snowpack to drive our tourism and agricultural economies, nourish our environment and support our unique quality of life.
Colorado should not only join the other 11 states that have adopted the Clean Cars program, but Colorado should also set hard goals and create a comprehensive plan for cutting global warming pollution. It’s time for us to start taking real action on global warming.

Meghan McCloskey, Colorado Springs

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (40) | TrackBack

Border a better choice than Piñon Canyon

The Army needs a larger maneuvering site. The people want more control of the border with Mexico to stop illegal immigration. I believe the Army’s larger maneuver site can best be obtained and justified by moving to an entirely new location.

The new location would be along the United States-Mexico border from Columbus, N.M., east about 50 miles and to the north for about 20 miles (640,000 acres).

The resulting border monitoring would be a secondary benefit.

Instead of practicing on beautiful grassland country, the more realistic dry canyon, hot desert and bare mountainous country would be more like Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran — terrain they will be in for the next 50 years.

The original owners of the existing Piñon Canyon training site should be given first option to buy back their property. The remainder could be offered to adjoining owners or sold at auction.
Applicable archaeological locations should be added to the Comanche National Grassland.

T.L. Beckley, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

A DIFFERING VIEW: Free Choice Act merely levels playing field

Remember the fable about Chicken Little? “The sky is falling” he frantically proclaims — scaring everyone to death that the end is near. It’s an allegory about not believing everything you are told.

In modern times, we have our own tall tales sold with fear and misinformation (June 21 editorial, “Saving secret ballots”). Today’s Chicken Littles — anti-union employers, business associations, and their allied lawmakers — use double- speak about jobs and the economy to scare the public into putting corporate profits above fair treatment for workers.

Fear mongers currently are gunning for legislation being debated in the Senate that would stop unscrupulous employers from denying workers a free choice to form a union. Their latest false alarm asserts that the proposed reforms will steal workers’ right to vote by secret ballot.

Rest assured, the sky is not falling. The Employee Free Choice Act does not take away elections. What the bill does prevent is an employer manipulating the flawed voting process in its favor. Under the proposed legislation, workers get to choose the union formation process—elections or majority signup, a method where workers have a union when a third party verifies signed cards indicating that a majority wants one.

Under the existing system involving secret ballots, when faced with organizing drives: 25 percent of employers illegally fire pro-union employees; 51 percent illegally coerce workers into opposing unions with bribery and favoritism; and, 91 percent force employees to attend one-on-one anti-union meetings with supervisors.

The Employee Free Choice Act would level the playing field by strengthening penalties against offending employers and give workers a fair shot at forming a union when they want one. Above all else, in America we believe in the right of all people to freely choose what’s best for themselves and their families.

Mary Beth Maxwell is executive director of American Rights at Work in Washington, D.C.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Proud to be a denier

Actually the “era of denial” is only over for members of the Church of Global Warming ... which evidently includes the Denver mayor and much of the city’s populace.

Feel free to worship at the altar of nuttiness, but as a proud denier of global warming, I will continue to enjoy producing all my carbon emissions and be reminded of Chicken Little every time these stupid stories hit the paper.

And on the off chance that I’m wrong (which we wouldn’t know for hundreds of years) and that your arrogance at thinking you can do anything about the purported man-made causes of global warming is correct, did it ever occur to you that maybe it might be beneficial for it to get just a bit warmer?

Dave Schallert, Parker

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (83) | TrackBack

Conscience vs. constituents

I listened to the debate regarding the vote on Rep. Diana DeGette’s embryonic stem cell bill, which recently passed both the House and the Senate and was vetoed by our president.

The interesting aspect of the debate was the testimony given by individual House members. Each member seemed to inject his or her own personal opinion and personal conscience regarding his or her support or lack of support for the bill, rather than concentrating on debating facts and the merits of the bill. Each member then seemed to vote his or her individual conscience, and not vote what polls state is the consensus of the constituency.

Those opposed to the bill stated that they did not want public tax dollars going to the destruction of human embryos — never mind that the majority of taxpayers who fund the congressional budget actually favor this type of research and budget spending.

When we vote, are we electing someone to represent us as a whole, or are we electing a “parent” figure to dictate laws to us that he or she thinks are in our own best interest?

Cheryl Redmond Doyle, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (26) | TrackBack

Apology warranted

Current research tells us that the human brain is not completely developed until approximately age 23 and that one of the last areas to mature involves decision-making.

Certainly, there are some high school students who demonstrate exceptional skills, but the majority are still in need of guidance and positive role-modeling in their decision-making around life-altering choices such as drug use and sexual experiences.

As a recently retired Boulder Valley School District health educator, I feel the drug-and-sex panel at Boulder High lacked experience in teaching adolescents and overstepped board policies in their dialogues. This panel may have been better suited to a college freshman audience.
Mistakes happen in the public arena, and this was one of them. An investigation and apology are warranted.

Lori Sinsel-Temanson, Golden

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

What do you expect from ‘city of wackos’?

Since the news broke on the latest debacle to come out of Boulder (“Drug-sex talk spurs more talk,” June 13), it has been interesting to watch the fur fly. The Boulder High School administrators should be proud of their enlightened and tolerant decision to subject their impressionable students to the morally bankrupt agenda of a panel of perverted “experts” who encouraged the students to experiment with sex and illegal drugs. The immediate fallout from this is not unexpected.

Arguing in support of the administration are the usual misguided teenagers spurred on by their depraved Boulderite parents. On the other side of the ring, a small minority clamor for some semblance of sanity while faced with the reality that trying to promote anything righteous in Boulder is like pushing on a rope.

Addressing the school board on June 12, a distraught parent reportedly made the incredulous statement, “Shame on all of you. If this is what living in Boulder is all about, then count me out.”
Excuse me? Did this person just fall off the turnip truck? Of course this is what living in Boulder is all about. For as long as I can remember, Boulder has maintained its dubious and much-deserved reputation as a city of wackos.

So why should there be any surprise when these things continue to surface?

Dwight Kinney, Longmont

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (16) | TrackBack

A lot of hysteria on climate change

Your June 11 article “Denver targets global warming,” hardly makes me want to rush out to buy some LED lamps. I’ll just wait until I’m forced to.

While I am all for becoming more efficient regarding energy usage, I think the Hickenlooper administration is ramming the climate change scare down my throat.

There is no scientific evidence that we are causing global warming or that we can stop natural global warming.

If the glacial ice sheet decides to cover Colorado again, how do we stop its advancement or prod it to recede?

Maybe Hickenlooper will have an answer.

Please don’t insult me, mayor, by tagging what we should all be doing to be less wasteful with this climate change hysteria.

Will Volskis, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (18) | TrackBack

June 23, 2007
Graffiti

Paula Elofson-Gardine of Lakewood writes:

What a well done article on the graffiti problem! TOO BAD WE CAN’T GET SIMILAR COMMITTMENT FROM *A*L*L* METRO CITIES TO ELIMINATE THIS BLIGHT ON THE COMMUNITIES.
CDOT should be participating in a statewide taskforce with law enforcement to use the existing cameras in place to catch the miscreants that like to deface other’s property.
Option #2, form vigilante groups armed with paintball guns to watch the 11pm to 7am shifts when the little taggers are out to catch and mark them, bind them with duct tape and deliver them to the police stations with photos and videotape of their latest graffiti artwork attached for proof of their misdeeds.
I personally favor option #2, after trying to fight the growing graffiti problem for the past 9 years by having CDOT’s graffiti cleanup crew on speed dial, who have valliantly tried to keep up with this problem.
This should be a PRIORITY for all cities, as it breeds more crime. It’s not a glamorous glad-handing “soft” political event type of topic like smiling and handing out good citizenship awards, but it should be given the proper treatment for the criminal element that engages in it. It is way past time to protect our property values and reclaim our cities from the gangs.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Denver & climate change

Ron Miller of Colorado Springs writes:

I just wanted to express my support of Mayor Hickenlooper’s plans to do something about carbon emissions, etc. as it appears the Rocky Mountain News is taking some flack for supporting. It’s too bad that our national leaders aren’t as far sighted as the Mayor, and I hope you continue to support these initiatives.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Gun violence

Marilee Louis Posavec of Littleton writes:

Kudos to Mayor Hickenlooper and other Mayors across America in their work to stop gun violence in their community. Mr. Tiahrt is not being honest about his amendment to restrict access crime trace data to law enforcement. The identity of undercover cops has always been protected under FOIA restrictions concerning the release of sensitive data.
Just over 1% of federally licensed dealers account for over 60% of firearms used in crimes. Under Mr. Tiahrt’s amendment, law enforcement is restricted to viewing only trace data for one crime gun at a time. This prevents them from identifying patterns of where the crime guns originate and to take action to shut down supply before more within their community are injured or killed by gang members or other criminals.
We need to ask who is really being protected. Could it be recently resigned NRA Board Member Sandy Abrams whose gun shop, Valley Gun in Baltimore, was cited for 900 violations of federal gun laws making his gun shop one of the leading supplier of crime guns in America?
In Denver-Aurora, 4 gun dealers supplied 29% of the guns used in crime. Who are they? The ATF is prohibited from releasing this information by Mr. Tiahrt. Isn’t it important that Denver police know who they are? It may be a long, hot summer.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (28) | TrackBack

Gangs

Keith Wanklyn of Highlands Ranch writes:

In reading the two articles in the June 15 Rocky Mountain News on the leniency plea of Justin Box and the companion article on “Police and city leaders to meet to tackle gang problem", I have a suggestion to help solve the Denver gang problem.
First of all, Justin Box got off easy and his light sentence does nothing to get existing gang members and potential young future gang members attention! He should have got life as a minimum, and if I were sentencing him I would have given him death.
These gangs are as dangerous to Americas future as Islamic and Al-Qaida terrorists. The gang issue in Denver and the USA will never be solved until laws are written to make any arrested gang member, no matter what age, subject to life in prison for any crime other than murder or attempted murder. If related to murder or attempted murder then an automatic life or death penalty should be imposed. I strongly believe that kind of message would solve the current gang problem and curtail any future new member recruitment. Yes, Justin Box’s sentence was very light! The judge who sentenced him should be ashamed of himself. With that light sentence he did nothing to help police curtail gang activity in Denver.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Colorado Ballet

Holly Baroway of Denver, member of the Colorado Ballet Board of Trustees, writes:

I would like to comment on Marc Shulgold’s comments regarding turnover at Colorado Ballet.
As a former dancer for 17 years with similarly sized companies, I would like to offer a different interpretation. I have been in Denver for 9 years and up until the hiring of Gil Boggs, I found myself unable to fully support Colorado Ballet. The ballet has always had a reasonable rooster of talented dancers, but the quality of choreography and productions was sub par. I attempted time and again to attend performances only to be disappointed and left feeling sorry for the disservice done to the fine dancers. Under Gil Boggs’ leadership (and noted in the Rocky Mountain News’ own reviews), the quality of the productions has taken a dramatic turn for the better, as is evidenced by the energy displayed by the dancers. I would also like to address the negativity placed on the departure of several of the dancers in the company. While Maria Mosina is starting a family she returned her letter of intent for the coming season and is very much on the roster for next year.. Koichi Kubo is also making a family decision. His wife, Mickey, received a job offer from San Francisco Ballet as a pianist in their school. Mickey and Koichi made the decision to move from the standpoint of what was best for their family. Chauncey Parsons is making a career decision to join a more contemporary company. As dancers grow and evolve in their very short careers, these things happen. In a ranked (Principal, Soloist and Corps de Ballet) company that does not have the luxury of six week seasons, it is a challenge for an artistic director to bring up new talent and a similar challenge for the younger dancers to have the opportunity to grow and develop as artists. Opportunity comes when principal dancers leave (for whatever reasons) and this brings excitement to the company. After a year of positive reviews for the company, I was truly disappointed with the negative overview of the upcoming season. There are new dancers, new works, and finally, a first class ballet company in the city of Denver. For that, my dancer soul is grateful.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Immigration legislation

Irwin MacLeod of Colorado Springs writes:

The Senate’s bill was rejected because most people realize now that it is not an immigration proposal, but a Migration proposal.  Giving the “Z” card to more than twelve million to illegal immigrants and allowing the families to come here would add millions and millions more.  If half the "Z” card holders were to bring their wives and two kids, it would be a multiple of three for every “Z” card holder, which would mean eighteen million more people plus the other half of “Z” card holders would bring some,  it would add another twenty million more immigrants, adding to the twelve million who are already here, which could add up to thirty or forty million more people in the next few years..With the 1986 law they gave green cards to three million  which allowed the green card holders to bring their families, which  added one million one hundred thousand more people to this country  this year, and with the fact that we allow a million and a million and a half legal immigrants, and their families, this would add millions more. This is MIGRATION - not IMMIGRATION.  No Nation on earth can assimilate this  many people.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (19) | TrackBack

Little wonder bigoted words unattributed

I have read published excerpts of readers’ comments left on the Rocky Mountain News Web site, and I am ashamed of some of my metro area neighbors who write such hateful and hurtful words against undocumented immigrants and those of us who only seek justice and fair play.

These people who stand for the status quo and have such high ideals for our country and who don’t want to open the doors to people seeking a better life as we have done in the past, should at least have the guts to have their names printed next to their shameful excess of hollow and bigoted words. They understand that if the people they know actually knew they could spew such awful and hate-filled words and thoughts so freely, some of their friends might actually walk away. After all, no one really wants to be considered a bigot.

Fidel “Butch” Montoya, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (66) | TrackBack

Denver dailies holier than New York’s? Hah!

Rocky Mountain News media critic Dave Kopel rips apart the New York Post and the New York Daily News for publishing A-Rod’s indiscretion on their front pages (“A-Rod’s indiscretion has no place on front page/Denver dailies wisely shun lurid tale,” On the Media, June 16). It seems the married Alex Rodriguez, a New York Yankee baseball star, was seen in a Toronto hotel with a stripper.

Kopel goes on to point out that the Denver papers would never follow these bad examples and publish salacious material on their front pages. This is three or four days after the Rocky completely filled its front page with the photo of the city attorney who allegedly stole a laptop computer.

The stolen laptop was old Page 3 news, but now that pornographic material was discovered on its hard drive, it became a front-page story.

A-Rod with a stripper is bad. The city attorney with pornographic material is good. Go figure!

Jim Threlkeld, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

‘Look, Honey, I shrunk the paper.’ Indeed!

I have adjusted to the new size while wondering what is missing. But wait! In your zeal to update, you have rendered the TV guide nearly useless! I don’t miss the sophomoric puzzles, etc., but I do deplore the absence of the numerical designations for the cable channels. Please modify.

Donna L. Mattson, Wheat Ridge

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Newspapers need to offer complete coverage

I love newspapers.

I love having something tangible to hold onto as I read about the day, or what might be happening tomorrow; I love writing that helps us understand the people we live around and the world we’re shaping; I even love getting black ink smeared all over my fingers by the time I’m done scanning the pages. I guess that’s why I became a news writer.

But now, it would seem, the future of the industry I love so dearly is faced with serious challenges.

Some of the largest newsrooms across the country, including The Denver Post, continue to offer buyouts and make “involuntary separations” with quality staffers amid budget shortfalls and declining revenues.

The reality certainly exists that many publicly traded news companies are ultimately accountable to their stockholders. Even private news venders have a bottom line to look after.

But, as I see it, it is the newspaper industry itself that’s to blame for its own downturn. As a whole, we do not yet understand how to make money selling to online readers; we no longer offer a diversity of news coverage, because we’ve fired writers who do it with excellence; and we don’t remember what a newspaper is supposed to be all about — offering our readers quality, complete coverage each day.

Relaying the news is a profession we should feel privileged to be a part of. Let’s make readers feel the same way.

Heath Urie, Thornton
Reporter, Evergreen Newspapers

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Crossword confusion calls for better editing

Please pay careful attention when editing the crossword puzzle. On June 9, the clue for 34-across was “sppeal.” I finally figured out it was a misspelling — it should have been “appeal.”

One-down was “aject one.” “Aject” wasn’t listed in either of my dictionaries — I tried to find it on an online dictionary, and it said there was no such word. A few weeks ago, there were two 54-downs.

Your readers who do the crossword puzzle need to figure out the answers — we should not be expected to figure out the clues also!

You may not think the crossword puzzle is that important, but for me it is a bonding experience with my 81-year-old mother. We call one another every day to see if each of us “got it.”

The crossword puzzle needs to be numbered correctly and include the proper spelling of words.

Patricia R. Henson, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

June 22, 2007
Immigration

Ernest E. Valdez of Thornton writes:

I read Thomas Sowell’s June 14 article, “The border must be dealt with first,” with some amusement but also with some concern. He may be a good writer and I don’t know how old he is but he has a lot to learn. The essence or crux of his article was that in fixing the immigrant problem in this country border control must be “proven to be established first.” “Where is the fence?” he asked. “That will still be the question 10 years from now” he said. Mr. Sowell forgets that this is planet earth.
I thank God that I was born in this country. I thank God for keeping me in good health all these years. However, I always said that I would climb any mountain, cross any ocean no matter how wet my back got to keep my children from getting hungry. (Go through hell or high water, I think they call it here). My ancestors the conquistadors did just exactly that 500 years ago.
Yet Mr. Sowell believes that a fence, a mere fence, or any wall for that matter would keep hungry migrants out. Something else that they say here, “you gotta be kidding me.”
I know what would solve the problem without fences of any kind or political Bush or Tancredo crap. Do what Jesus said 2000 years ago, “love your neighbor.” Love your neighbor and l little bit of common sense that goes along with that love. Instead of sending hundreds of thousands of our soldiers to die or at the least to get wounded in some kind of stupid futile effort across the ocean send a few economists, engineers, and agrarians south across the Rio Grande river. Instead of spending scientists and astronauts into orbit for God knows what, send them across the border to do God’s work; to assist our neighbor to take better care of their own.
Those neighbors of ours would love them dearly with Mariachi music and tasty tacos. All the while our country would be providing a worthwhile service that would not only keep those people home where they would rather be, but would also keep us from erecting some kind of of expensive but useless, worthless wall. How quickly we forget, it seems that not too long ago a very famous peson in this country shouted, “ Mr. Gorbachov bring that wall down.”

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (31) | TrackBack

Boulder Valley Schools

Reed Larsen of Lakewood writes:

I believe that the People’s Republic of Boulder should free Dr. Michael Barta. I find it hypocritical to arrest this gentleman and scholar on the basis of archaic laws prohibiting prostitution. I mean, if it feels good, people ought to be able to do it. That is what Dr. Barta’s employer, the Boulder Valley School District, advocates. If it feels good to masturbate, then do it. If you want to do drugs and have multiple sex partners, then do it. If you want to hire a prostitute, then do it. So whats the problem with prostitution. It only degrades the community and destroys families.
No big deal. Free Dr. Barta ... it just feels good. In fact, Dr. Barta should be promoted. He should be the next superintendent of Boulder Valley School District.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (16) | TrackBack

Gangs & illegal immigration

Steve Schweitzberger of Littleton writes:

Every time I hear about gang activity, lack of jobs is also mentioned.
I worked in Sidney, Nebraska, on the farm of my Uncle Conrad Messing, every summer from the time I could drive a truck in the field to the time I went into the Air Force. It was my summer job. The first Black person I met also worked on the family farm for uncle Messing. When asked what he did, Commodore Goings said, “whatever nobody else wants to do". Commodore came up from Denver year after year, same as I did. My uncle was not lazy, he simply needed help so he could take care of other operations involving a wheat and cattle farm.
Why is there not more conversation about what has happened to the jobs that somebody needs to do, but not everyone wants to do, unless they are being paid a wage worthy of their time? Is it because illegal immigration has provided a cheap form of politically-correct slavery, off the books?
Entry-level jobs in labor, agriculture and construction, are exactly the kind of jobs young men once performed to begin a life founded on work ethics and productivity. Young men having nothing better to do than hang out in groups, wearing gang colors, while politicians whine about lack of jobs for them, seems to illuminate a correlation between Americans needing jobs and Jobs Americans supposedly will no longer do. The jobs belong to our own citizens first.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Smoking

Erin Bertoli, senior director of government affairs for the American Heart Association; Curt Huber, executive director of the American Lung Association of Colorado; and Kelley Daniel, vice president of government relations for the American Cancer Society, write:

As the one-year anniversary of the smoke-free law approaches, we would like to thank Governor Ritter for recently signing a bill that will help our state provide additional protection from the dangers of secondhand smoke.
Last week, Gov. Ritter signed House Bill 1269 into law, which will require all casinos in Black Hawk, Central City and Cripple Creek to be smoke-free as of Jan. 1, 2008.
Our states smoke-free law continues to help improve public health in Colorado. Recently, a study by the State Tobacco Education and Prevention Partnership found that air pollution in hospitality venues, including bars and restaurants, has improved by nearly 70 percent since the smoke-free law took effect, and that a health rating by the EPA had changed from unhealthy to good. Casinos were the only venue in the study that did not improve during that time and maintained an unhealthy air-quality rating. But now thanks to Gov. Ritter and Colorados legislature, casino employees and guests will also be able to enjoy a healthier indoor environment.
We applaud our states decision to include casinos among Colorados smoke-free workplaces, and were confident that the health benefits of smoke-free indoor environments will continue to provide a breath of fresh air for all Coloradans.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (78) | TrackBack

TV listings

A.J. Reasoner of Wheat Ridge writes:

I was not happy with the diminished size of the Rocky Mtn. News. Not receiving the T.V. information in the paper daily, was another slap in the face. Then came the unreadable “format” of the TV Weekly Guide. Top that with Comcasts’dis-continued programming on channel 99.
I visited my Comcast Customer Service Center and was told the discontinued information channels were to expand programming. I can continue to receive on-screen TV scheduling, it would be FREE for the first year and and $l, each year thereafter.
Whoopppeee!
My question to Comcast and The Rocky Mountain News is this...why do your subscribers have to pay to find out what is on T.V. when they already are paying for your service and buying your paper?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Immigration legislation

Robert Lipton of Lakewood writes:

The pundits and politicians, including our Sen. Ken Salazar, are finger-pointing at everyone for the failure of the immigration bill to get through the Senate.
The reason the public raised such heck is not because of a word“amnesty”but because of complete distrust of enforcement of the bills provisions. A similar bill was passed in 1986. The bill included amnesty for about 3 million illegals, the closing of the border and penalties for hiring illegals. The latter two provisions were never enforced by either Republican or Democratic administrations. Why expect more now? Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Abortion

Robert E. Forman of Lakewood writes:

According to an article in the Thursday 6/14/07 edition of the Rocky Mountain News (National group boots Right to Life, page 8), there is a “dispute” among Christians about how “pro-life” the pro-life cause must be and whether or not anything that appears to be a “compromise” is bad. Basically the dispute seems to be centered between the Colorado Right to Life Committee (so ultra pro-life they condemn compromise) and James Dobson (a realist).
I am pro-life — but I am also a realist. It’s one thing to be ultra-pro-life amongst ourselves (among Christians and/or ultra pro-lifers), but the fact is we live, work, and vote for politicians in a fallen world — and a marathon race is never won with one giant leap; it’s won one step at a time for 26 miles. Even the Apostle Paul talked about running the race, completing the race — and we do that one step at a time, one small victory at a time if need be.
When Christ started His ministry on earth almost 2,000 years ago, He didn’t heal EVERYONE ALL AT ONCE in one BIG SWOOP. He spent 3 years healing one or two here, one or two there.
We’ve had 30 years of Roe vs Wade. After 30 years, the CRLC should figure out that it is not going to go away all at once, if at all. If we can count a small victory here or there, so be it. Small victories mean small changes in the hearts, in the minds, and in the attitudes of some people. If we get enough small victories upon which to build bigger victories, great; that’s what it’s all about, isn’t it?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (46) | TrackBack

Fuel-efficient vehicles

Kirpal Singh of Denver, staff attorney for the Colorado Public Interest Research Group, writes:

The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers has pulled a fast one again.
Instead of spending their time and resources manufacturing cars that won’t cost consumers a ton of money to operate, they have managed to convince a few elected officials from Colorado to support their misguided, anti-consumer agenda once again. These poor (or maybe not-so poor?) gentlemen have been duped into thinking that constantly refueling their SUVs at today’s gas prices is a good thing. They must not live on a budget like most families do. More efficient pick-up trucks, minivans and SUVs will make sure that Coloradans and their families will stop lining the pockets of Big Oil with their hard earned cash. If the public wants to drive more efficient versions of these vehicles, why can’t we require automobile manufacturers to make them? Say no to gas-guzzling vehicles because Colorado deserves better.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Iraq

Cord MacGuire of Boulder writes:

Everyone has an opinion about how long U.S. forces should remain in Iraq.
After all, it’s a superpower’s prerogative to make these determinations.
A large majority of Americans want our troops out sooner rather than later.
Others, most notably the President, have floated the sobering idea that we might keep significant forces there for more than fifty years.
Divergent views on the issue exist among congressional Democrats. Hillary Clinton, for instance, has allowed that a ten year duration in Iraq feels just about right to her. Meanwhile, our own Mark Udall has endorsed the Baker/Hamilton report’s quiet allusion to an enduring U.S. presence of some 70,000 troops, if only to defend Iraq’s presumedly then privatized petroleum assets.
But, while we dither over these matters, events in Iraq may soon compel what many a Cassandra has long predicted. The insurgents are systematically blowing up every bridge in Baghdad, gradually encircling the increasingly isolated & vulnerable Green Zone. Whatever fatuous timelines may be set in Washington, the insurgency seems to be inexorably moving ahead with its plan to overrun the Green Zone before the enormously secretive new U.S. embassy there is scheduled to open for official business in August.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Veterans

James J. Tenant of Centennial writes:

The U.S. Senate is about to vote to spend $500 million in Colorado for military construction, money that would pay for everything from beds for veterans, to dental care for active duty soldiers. More than $14 billion in federal monies have already been spent in T-REX, FasTracks, CBMS, Fitzsimons redevelopment, CSU, Metro State College, and UCDHSC, and disabled veterans’ “golden eggs” (federal job and contracting preferences), were either aborted or vaporized.
It is time for U.S. senators Allard and Salazar, to scuttle or dry-dock, S.S. AMNESTY (just another slave ship). All of their efforts in this vessel, have been expended, solely for the financial gain of the Vatican, GOP, Mexican gov’t, ag and construction industries, Wal-Mart, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, etc. The Amnesty’s crew-members got far more jobs and contracts (preference) in our local federal projects, than vets. Flats workers (nuke) and veterans issues have been off Allard’s and Skipper Salazar’s political radar, and we should remember this at the polls. Allard has promised, he won’t seek re-election. “I thank God and Greyhound, you’re gone".

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Double standard

What a great human interest picture on the front page of the June 12 Rocky Mountain News: a newborn in an incubator being transported from the old hospital to the new hospital! How many times have you been in an office when a mother brings her new baby to work? Doesn’t everybody congregate around the two of them? Isn’t it amazing that we can have this attitude as individuals, but as a society we condone the killing of 3,000 babies per day by abortion?

Jay and Dianne Moyers, Centennial

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (55) | TrackBack

Leaving tax money in the dust in Denver

Regarding the new motorcycle exhaust law, I vote with my money, Denver. I spend a lot of money at motorcycle and gear stores in Denver proper, sometimes driving miles to get a good deal or go to a great store. In case you haven’t checked lately, jackets, boots, helmets, etc., cost hundreds of dollars. The tax on those purchases goes to Denver. I think I won’t do that anymore. I’d hate to get caught with an after-market exhaust system on my used bike, even though it isn’t loud. I guess I will just have to shop the suburbs instead.

Tina Cook, Broomfield

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (17) | TrackBack

Just another Day in the Life for Mike Rosen

June 1 marked the 40th anniversary of the release of the Beatles album, Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. Rocky Mountain News columnist Mike Rosen missed a prime opportunity to analyze and deconstruct this radical piece of progressive pablum as he did when he masterfully critiqued the dated but still socialist Imagine in his column of Nov. 17, 2006, “It’s hard to ‘Imagine’ that.”
To wit, A Little Help from My Friends is a transparent anthem to our confiscatory welfare state and When I’m Sixty-Four is certainly an homage to our fatally flawed Social Security system. The legendary album cover is filled with images of miscreants (Oscar Wilde and Aleister Crowley, sexual deviants) and the politically misguided (Karl Marx [Marxist], John Lennon [Lennonist] and Karl Jung [Nazi]) to name a few.
Instead of the Sgt. Pepper’s deconstruction, Rosen gave us, literally, dog do-do (“Protest is going to the dogs,” June 1). Let’s leave it to the psychologists to analyze Rosen’s scatology.

K. Parker, Parker

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (21) | TrackBack

A DIFFERING VIEW: Evidence of Flats’ exposure in grand jury record

The Rocky’s June 17 editorial (“Leavitt needs to step in”) suggests that good data do not always exist showing that some Rocky Flats workers were exposed to dangerous levels of radiation.

I disagree. There are literally volumes of data in the 1989-1992 federal grand jury investigation, including the sworn testimony of workers, Rockwell supervisors and federal investigators, describing shoddy security procedures and radioactive spills.

When the then-U.S. attorney allowed the contractor to plead guilty in lieu of a possible criminal indictment, the grand jury was dismissed and the record sealed. Grand jurors were even told not to speak publicly about what they had seen or heard during grand jury proceedings.

If Secretary of Health and Human Services Michael Leavitt is truly interested in the welfare of Flats workers, he could show that concern by petitioning the government to open the grand jury report.

Jere Joiner lives in Divide.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

June 21, 2007
Gangs

David L. Stevenson of Denver writes:

I read the city is planning a “gang” summit next month. It hasn’t been decided who would be invited. Why not invite gang members and their families or maybe the gangs could co-host the summit on shared turf.
Including the gangs might help all involved get a balanced, realistic understanding of all the issues involved and deliver practical, long-term solutions.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:47 AM | Comments (16) | TrackBack

Mark Udall & Iraq

Evan Freirich of Boulder writes:

U.S. Rep. Mark Udall’s voting record on the war in Iraq now rivals blank-check Republicans and conservative Democrats who oppose specific timelines to end the war. This is out of step with the majority of the American people and the congressman’s far more liberal district who want a specific timetable to end the war and bring the troops home.
The congressman’s most recent voting record says it all.
May 10: Udall opposed the McGovern bill that provided for a specific plan for troop withdrawal. The bill was supported by two-thirds of the House Democrats, including other Colorado Reps. Diana DeGette and Ed Perlmutter.
May 24: Udall again breaks with a significant majority of House Democrats and supports a war spending bill which offers President Bush no troop withdrawal timelines.
Udall’s rationale is that he supports greater diplomacy. The net effect is that congressional war critics lose a valuable vote to bring closure to the war and President Bush gets the votes he needs for a blank check for the war again and again.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:46 AM | Comments (16) | TrackBack

Health care for children

Anne Warhover, president and CEO of The Colorado Health Foundation, writes:

When people don’t have health insurance, they are more likely to develop health problems and eventually, we all pay the price. Uninsured people put off care until they have to go to the emergency room and if they can’t pay the cost, it gets passed along to those who have insurance.
That’s why it’s in the best interest of every Coloradan to want everyone in our state to be insured. Legislators, health providers and business leaders are all working together to develop strategies to do just that.
We can start by encouraging Congress to expand funding for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). This successful program combines state and federal money to cover low-income children whose families don’t qualify for Medicaid.
Right now, more than 50,000 Colorado children and pregnant women are covered by the program. These children get the shots and checkups they need, and mothers-to-be get the prenatal care that will contribute to a healthy baby. But another 56,000 who would qualify for the program aren’t enrolled. Colorado can cover some of these children with current funding, but in order to give all of them the care they need, we must have more money from the federal government.
On the flip side, if Congress does not expand funding, Colorado will run a deficit in its SCHIP program in just a few years and Colorado children already covered by SCHIP will be in danger of losing that care.
I urge all members of Colorado’s congressional delegation to do the right thing for Colorado’s children and families. Expand funding for SCHIP; we’ll all benefit.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:45 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Roan Plateau drilling

[PS]Pete Morton, Ph.D., of Denver, a senior resource economist for The Wilderness Society, writes:

The Rocky’s support for drilling on the Roan Plateau (The Roan reaction,” June 12) relies on the Bureau of Land Management’s faulty plan for this regional treasure. A 2004 analysis by The Wilderness Society suggested that the BLM exaggerated the gas potential of the Roan Plateau, while the agency’s current analysis underestimates the damages to wildlife and our Western landscape from drilling.
The Rocky Mountain News mistakenly buys the BLM’s assertion that habitat loss on Roan Plateau will be capped at 1 percent which equates to about one well per 640 acres. However, the 1 percent cap does not consider the habitat lost from the 138 miles of existing roads, nor does it count future disturbance from grazing, dirt bikes or off-road vehicles.
In addition, well pad sites will not be restored to a natural state, as one acre from each well pad is exempted from the 1 percent cap.
The Roan Plateau is a prized destination for hunting and fishing, yet the BLM failed to use the best available science when estimating how drilling will damage wildlife habitat. The BLM’s faulty assumptions about the pace at which drilling occurs and the frequency with which wildlife protections are waived, make it clear that the negative effects on wildlife will be far greater than assumed by the BLM.
Adding insult to injury, the Bush administration asks us to trust the oil and gas industry to comply with an untested package of drilling guidelines despite overwhelming evidence that industry almost always finds a way to sidestep restrictions.
Roan Plateau is an ecological treasure, a recreational paradise and a key cog in the regional economy. It is not the place to “test” new industry guidelines or to rush into drilling when the governor and congressional delegation ask for more time to ensure that the BLM has adequately assessed the economic and environmental costs of drilling.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:44 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Denver’s green plan

James M. Taylor of Chicago, senior fellow for environment policy at The Heartland Institute, writes:

In “Some see red on Denver’s green plan” (June 12), Mayor Hickenlooper justifies his radical global warming plan by asserting that “According to most polls, 70 percent of the people in Colorado recognize there is global warming.” However, recognizing that the Earth has moderately warmed since the end of the Little Ice Age does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that the City of Denver should impose extremist limitations on its citizens. So far, global warming has resulted in longer growing seasons, expanding forests, and increased crop production. And even if we speculate that at some point we will experience “global warming gone bad,” Denver’s proposed plan is all pain and no gain. The plan will not reduce global warming by any measurable degree, yet will impose significant economic costs on Denver citizens.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 09:29 AM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Missile defense

Jim Bernath of Englewood writes:

OK, Mr. President, please explain why we are putting new missiles in Europe if not to confront Russia and China? Terrorists now have ICBMs? Or is it to further line the pockets of your defense contractor chums? Or is it just your old M.O. that has already taken brinksmanship to new levels: “When in doubt, rattle sabers?
I’ve been afraid for a long time that this president would be known to history as the Apocalypse president, except that there will be no recorded history to tell his terrible tale.

Posted by denver-admin at 09:28 AM | Comments (15) | TrackBack

Ward Churchill

Stephen McBrayer of Aurora writes:

In response to Professor Tom Mayer’s letter titled, “Churchill profound, knowledgeable”:
After reading the good professor’s letter, I would’ve bet a paycheck he worked at the University of where? Oh, Boulder. That he lived where? Oh, Boulder. And the capper, he taught in the department of what? Oh, sociology.
May I suggest the good professor and his “love light” Ward Churchill do us all a favor and purchase 2 one-way tickets for themselves out of this country? Bon voyage and good riddance.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 09:27 AM | Comments (27) | TrackBack

Israel & Palestinians

Gary Anderson of Northglenn writes:

This article was a reasonably accurate take on the rally of June 10th. But the title only mentioned the “West Bank” portion of Palestine (2.5 million people). The rally addressed the Occupation of all lands captured in 1967, including Gaza with its 1.5 million residents.
The article mentions an “often-violent struggle", citing the 9 June failed attempt by “Palestinian gunmen” to abduct an Israeli soldier. While abduction by Palestinians is virtually unprecedented, Israeli forces enter Palestine and abduct 5-10 persons every day.
On the same day cited (June 9th) Israeli Army forces abducted at least 9 Palestine citizens: 6 from Hebron and Aroub, and 3 from Yatta (So. Hebron).
Further, I find it odd that RMN did not mention that Israel has so far abducted some 44 members of Palestine’s legislature. What would happen if any nation were to capture and incarcerate a single member of Israel’s governing body, the Knesset (much less 1/2 of them)? Would that not be considered an act of terror? In the past month, Israeli forces have also abducted at least 6 mayors of West Bank towns. How is Palestine to govern, with much of its legislative body sitting in Israeli prisons? If RMN chooses to contextualize a local event by adding information about events in Israel and Palestine, the items chosen should serve to educate, and should not skew the information to create a false sense of reality to the reader.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 09:27 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

War on terror

Richard L. Stover of Grand Junction writes:

It’s amazing how a List (al Qaeda) of Mujahideen guerilla fighters compiled by the CIA in Afghanistan evolved into a world wide terrorist threat. Just goes to show you how powerful a repeated suggestion is.
Plain old common sense should tell you that that there’s no place for outside forces in Iraq because in that deadly, suspicious environment, outsiders would probably be shot on sight. Who would they know, where would they live,?
Of course the media mentions al Qaeda (the list) every time they get the chance, but only because it has much more reader appeal than just the samo, samo civil war.
Beware of the evil list.
The way the media tells the Sunni from the Shi’a is by the neighborhoods, and that’s about as far as they can realistically go. I can’t see a captured Arab admitting anything, let alone that he’s al-Qaeda or even Sunni, and they probably don’t have identity cards or tattoos of OBL on their chests.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 09:26 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Immigration

Robert Lipton of Lakewood writes:

Politicians from the left and right state they are in favor of “securing the border” if so, why don’t they do it ? Vote on a bill securing the border then take up the difficult “path to citizenship “question. We know the reason .
They can hide behind the difficulty of the latter to avoid acting on the former.. What a bunch of dissembling clowns.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 09:26 AM | Comments (18) | TrackBack

Teen needs help, not prison time

If anyone is in need of affirmation that our judicial system is getting out of hand with its determination to make headlines out of nothing, one only needs to look at the decision of District Attorney Carol Chambers to charge 17-year-old Ponderosa High School student Caleb Pegues as an adult for his obviously stupid prank with a smoke bomb (“Was explosive a kid’s prank or a felony?” June 9).
Young Pegues was only guilty of gross immaturity when he set off a harmless smoke bomb in an attempt to disrupt pot smokers on campus. He has already been dealt with, appropriately, by the school expelling him. To “Nifong” him with adult felony charges in lieu of some serious counseling and a diversion program is in itself criminal.
Is it worth a few soon-to-be-forgotten subheadlines to persecute a young man? A persecution that could lead to the eventual development of an unproductive if not truly criminal individual?
Although I don’t know Pegues, I don’t believe another notch in the judicial bench is worth destroying a young life, which only needs a little corrective nudge to become a productive asset to society.

David R. Forward, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (20) | TrackBack

Patrol’s harassment campaign in full swing

I noted that the Colorado State Patrol issued 15,500 citations during the Memorial Day weekend, as their annual campaign to crack down on drunken drivers goes into effect (“Sobering statistics from Memorial Day,” Extra!, May 30).
I further noted that, of those 15,500 tickets issued, there were apparently only 298 issued for DUI and DUID (driving under the influence of drugs). In other words, despite their constitutionally dubious DUI roadblocks (“Probable cause?” “We don’t need no stinking probable cause!”) and their mobilizing all available patrolmen, fewer than 2 percent(!) of citations issued were for the stated cause of curbing drunk driving.
On the other hand, they did issue 6,651 speeding tickets, which works out to 43 percent of the total number issued. All those tickets will no doubt bring in hundreds of thousands of dollars in revenue to the state — anyone care to hazard a guess what the real reason is for their motorist-harassment campaign?

Mark Herzfeld, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (40) | TrackBack

Man-made warming is junk science

So Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper intends to go green. What a fool ... or should I say, what a Democrat?
The myth of man-made global warming is the current religion of the left. Why? Because, like Hick’s proposal, it provides a means for increasing taxes, fees, regulations and red tape, leaving us citizens with less freedom and less money.
Is mankind causing the environment to warm, leading to disasters of unimaginable proportions? Of course not! Such “science” is junk science and can best be described as a religion. What causes the Earth to warm (and cool) over time? In decreasing order they are solar activity, atmospheric moisture (clouds) and, a distant third, so-called greenhouse gases. Among those things that produce greenhouse gases, oceans and nature (i.e., volcanic eruptions) far exceed anything done by mankind. So, you see, cutting back on our production of greenhouse gases will have little if any effect.
I can understand this because I do not benefit directly from promoting this junk science. I am not a government-employed scientist or a leftist politician looking for a pseudocrisis to advance my agenda. I am just a citizen who knows that this is a lie which, when repeated often enough in the media, becomes truth. Neither am I a hypocrite like Al Gore who has a “carbon footprint” many times that of the average citizen.

Douglas Dillon, Castle Rock

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (59) | TrackBack

Hypocritical stance

It’s now popular for city and state authorities to promote energy conservation. Yet Denver continues to approve building permits for mega-mansions requiring large air conditioning units because all the trees have been removed for the building bulk. A bit hypocritical?

Nan Graham, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Expose the occupiers

Forty years ago, Israel “Pearl Harbored” Egypt’s Air Force in a destructive, sucker-punch, pre-emptive airstrike. Israel won the West Bank, Gaza, Sinai, etc., by military force in the subsequent Six Day War.
This land taken and kept by military force hints that it can be taken back by military force. Thus the Geneva Convention outlaws it because there might be no end to the cycle.
Israel attacked our ship the USS Liberty during the conflict, carefully shooting the Americans who tried to leave the severely damaged ship.
The skilled mendacity that will be spun doesn’t change this. It must be exposed so Americans might understand that our interests are not those of this vicious militaristic theocracy. Question the loyalty of our politicians who threaten American security trying to please their real constituency: Israeli occupiers.

Eric Bard, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (17) | TrackBack

Libby takes one for the team

Many on the far right feel Scooter Libby is being unfairly persecuted through his 30-month jail sentence. But hey, he is dutifully taking the rap for the team, or more precisely for the vice president, for an arrogant act of partisan hackery, the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame. He then obstructed justice by lying to the grand jury and investigative agencies of the United States. This wasn’t about a dalliance with an intern. What happened to all the outrage about the rule of law?
Luckily, the current Congress cares more about the country than to drag everyone through an impeachment trial, if we can possibly avoid it for the next 17 months.

Mike Clow, Colorado Springs

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Plame probe political

Paul Campos states in his June 12 column (“And justice for all?”) that Scooter Libby “lied under oath about some details of a campaign to smear opponents of Iraq war.” He asserts that these lies were morally reprehensible and damaging to the nation.
Scooter Libby was found guilty of revealing classified information in the investigation of the leak of the identity of a CIA agent.
Since the prosecutor knew before the investigation who first disclosed the classified information concerning Valerie Plame’s CIA affliliation, it is easy to assume the whole investigation was intended to find more damaging information and failed to do so.

R. Hartwell, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (26) | TrackBack

Obama can’t lose

Barack Obama cannot lose. That is, if he doesn’t win the Democratic nomination he has still earned such a stellar reputation and planetary name recognition that with a powerful position in a Democratic administration for four years he’ll be more than ready in the following election.
And then again, if he were to win, he wins.
Either way.

Grant D. Cyrus, Boulder

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Let market decide

If Whole Foods would be foolish enough to raise prices and reduce quality as a result of a merger with Wild Oats, let the market decide. Don’t we still have a free enterprise system, or did Hillary already become president?

Ira Indich, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

June 20, 2007
Iraq & war on terror

Franki Rader of Thornton writes:

In response to Stephen McBrayer’s response to Michal Kucera’s letter: Among Kucera’s head in the sand” drivel, he states : “it was our invasion of Iraq that created or brought the terrorist there".
Then Stephen McBrayer asks “Who held American hostages for 44 days in 1979? the answer is Iran, not Iraq.
He asks about other attacks on the U. S. overseas and since it has been so long, I don’t remember,but I do know it was not Iraq.
The only thing Iraq did was invade Kuwait in 1990.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:20 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Rocky Flats workers

Chris Trainor of Evergreen writes:

If the former Rocky Flats workers were to leave the country, renounce their U.S. citizenship, and then re-enter the country illegally (which can’t be hard, thousands do it every day), they could then show up at any hospital in the country and have all of their medical needs taken care of for free.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:19 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Foreign exchange students

Alisa Hug (no hometown provided) writes:

I have been involved with foreign exchange students now for a couple of years and I’ve learned that the world can be made better through this experience. Until a family has had the experience, they cannot imagine how rewarding it is to bring the world into your own home and to see the bond being created between a host family and a teenager from another part of the world. Having these students in our homes does help us gain understanding, acquire knowledge, and learn skills needed to live in our culturally diverse world.
I personally have had a student from France. This coming school year we will host a student from Korea. We bought a globe (what a learning experience for my kids!) to see where our host kids lived in relation to us, not to mention the size of their country compared to ours. Have you heard of Azerbaijan? We hadn’t (except maybe at opening ceremonies of the Olympics when we always wonder where in the world ARE all of those countries?). Now, we know. We learned. It’s great!
By having these students live with our families, we break down the barriers that divide people, not only across international borders, but also within our own community. It’s a great opportunity to experience another country without leaving your own home. The rewards a family will reap are unlimited.
I urge everyone to consider the possibility of volunteering to host an exchange student. The nonprofit company I work with is CIEE (Council on International Education Exchange) www.ciee.org. I would be happy to help anyone that’s interested.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:18 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Carbon offsets

Mike Hagan of Greeley writes:

Vincent Carroll brought up good points about the folly of Frontier Airlines’ contemplated foray into “carbon offsets.” But there are ways a pro-environmentalist who feels guilty about flying can get instant gratification in cutting their carbon footprint. Instead of giving the $30 to Frontier all one has to do is go to the local nursery, buy a bush and plant it in the backyard. This way the yard looks better, the local economy is boosted and no middle man is involved.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:06 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Boulder High controversy

Pete Werner of Castle Pines writes:

Regarding the recent Boulder School Board meeting addressing the sex-and-drugs talk at Boulder High, I am amazed that board members could be so accommodative and concerned for the opinion of the students. The Board needs to be reminded that these students are still children, regardless of how mature they think they are at the age of fifteen.
To a youngster, the reason they cannot do many things that they would like to is that their parents won’t let them. Many years later, maturity and life experience bring an understanding that there are underlying reasons for doing (or refraining from) many things, and that adults in authority (parents, teachers, clergy, etc.) were essentially conduits for those reasons.
The truly dangerous period in life is the time when the child has learned the limits of their parents’ or teachers’ control and how to circumvent that control, but have not yet acquired an understanding of the underlying reasons for doing (or refraining from) certain things.
That’s called Adolescence, and it appears that most Boulder School Board members never outgrew that period. Nor did most of the rest in Boulder, apparently.
The message those members are sending these kids is that there are no boundaries and morals are all relative, so go ahead and experiment with drugs and have unprotected sex while not worrying that any attempt will be made to limit that behavior because you’re considered a mature adult at the age of fifteen.
The fact that the Boulder School Board is so clueless about what responsibilities they hold toward their students indicates that they experienced arrested development as adolescents. That’s the only explanation as to why they could fail to understand how many lines were crossed during those presentations.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:06 PM | Comments (27) | TrackBack

Piñon Canyon expansion

Warren Mauter of Denver writes:

The Army’s recent announcement regarding their revised plans for the Pinon Canyon Expansion should not alleviate the concerns of any of our national or state representatives. Farmers, ranchers and town residents in the area know the fight is not over.
They know the plans implementation only delays the economic devastation of a whole section of the state. That, no matter what the Army says, their continued actions demonstrate a total disregard for the obvious impact to the people, towns and environment of the area. That, the new revised plan only means the Army will come back in a few years wanting more after the result of this first phase has left communities crippled.
The Army’s argument of need is fabricated with justifications being made by an agency accountable only to its own interests. Public meetings have been conducted as diversionary measures. Justifications presented at these meetings would be laughable if the impact of their implementation were not so serious.
Reporters and letters to the editor have noted that the Middle East is not a landscape of grassland, cattle or sage. That, the conflicts in Iraq were initiated with air strikes that concluded in a matter of days and afterwards were fought in cities.
They note that the Army has alternatives and is underutilizing existing facilities throughout the country.
Elected state representatives must know the devastation that the Pinon Canyon Expansion will bring to a whole section of the state and they need act beyond passive resolutions. Each and every justification of needpresented by the Army should be addressed in a credible and documented report. The Governor, the legislature and state agencies have the authority and resources to do this. The generation and presentation of such a report exposing the Army’s claims to facts is the only way to change an otherwise inevitable outcome.
Working with our congressional representatives, the Governor and state legislators should commission a committee to examine and expose each and every claim made by the Army. They must act now with content and conviction for the residents of southeastern Colorado. Resolutions and concerns have no impact and will not change a thing. The revised plan is a delaying tactic by the Army that cannot be accepted.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:05 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Stalker victim

Peggy Anderson writes:

Re: State Pays for Stalker’s Note, June 8, 2007

As the target of the stalker Robert Vinyard, I feel it is in the public’s interest to know why I have chosen not to press charges for new contacts and to understand the failures of the Colorado Criminal Code regarding insanity pleas.
Current Colorado law does not provide for a “Guilty, Insane” verdict. When the stalker was deemed insane, therefore, he was found “Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity” with no conviction and no sentence. He was remanded to the Colorado Mental Health Institute for an undetermined period of time.
If new charges were pressed, in all likelihood, the stalker would again be found “Not Guilty, Insane,” and he would be committed, just as he is now. If he were found sane and guilty, charges would apply to new contacts only, and the outcome would likely be a short prison sentence and release. In 2003, the stalker was released from prison without parole. Within two days, an intense stalking episode ensued.
All new contacts are reported to the police. When a change in the stalker’s status is requested, this evidence will be presented for consideration in determining if he meets the criteria for release or conditional release. By law, these criteria include level of dangerousness, ability to distinguish right from wrong, and the capacity to conform to the law.
While current Colorado statutes provide mental-health treatment and hospital confinement for the perpetrator in “insanity” cases, they do not hold him accountable for his crimes and are wholly inadequate to protect the crime victim or the community. A provision for a “Guilty, Insane” verdict, which ensures public safety, addresses the mental-health issues, and upholds the rights of the crime victim, is needed.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:04 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Health insurance

Russ Dorfler of Littleton writes:

I find it disappointing the Rocky elected to limit the Colorado Senate and Governor Ritter’s passage and House Bill 1355. This law reverses the progress the State of Colorado has made in stabilizing health insurance premiums. The Colorado Senate completely ignored the pleas from insurance carriers and small business. The voices of the business and healthcare community were not even sought. Health insurance premiums only reflect the cost of healthcare, trying to control premiums by manipulating the insurance coverage is a futile effort. To be successful we must address healthcare costs directly.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:02 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Dixie Chicks & President Bush

Tommy Holeman of Longmont writes:

The Dixie Chicks were right.
The Yankee/Texican who would be King needs to be reminded that, according to our Constitution, the government belongs to We the People.
Not the yellow-bellied tinhorn dictator wannabe currently residing at 1600 Pennsylvania.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 PM | Comments (38) | TrackBack

Immigration legislation

Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

Immigration reform is essential, but it will not occur by reviving the “compromise bill” defeated last week in the Senate. Unless the issue of border security is addressed, the Senate immigration bill is an exercise in futility. The American people do not support any bill that provides amnesty for illegal aliens, gang members, and suspected terrorists. According to the Rasmussen poll, only 23 percent of Americans support the Senate legislation. Yet, the President is working with Democrats to pass legislation that would essentially throw open the borders to anyone. We hope the Senate will see this travesty for what it is and reject it categorically. In short our nation’s survival may well depend upon it.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

June 19, 2007
To win the war, look at our Constitution

Letter writer Richard Colwell (June 11) asks, “Who won in Iraq?”
Nobody. So far there are only losers. The 3,500 dead American soldiers lost. The tens of thousands of dead Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds have lost. Saddam Hussein lost. George W. Bush and the Republicans lost (although they were winning in 2002). American citizens lost. The U.S. Constitution lost.
I’ve opposed this war from before it started, but even I know that we could still win. But first we have to define what constitutes victory.
Putting more troops on the ground in Iraq is not a victory. In fact, it’s not even a means to an end when we have no idea what that end ought to be.
Interestingly, the secret to winning may be in our own Constitution — a federal government with extremely limited power built on many smaller sovereign states. It allowed colonies with different official religions, economies and views on human rights to create a united nation.
Unfortunately, I don’t think our president has ever read the Constitution he swore to protect. If he had, he might know that torture, pre-emptive war, warrantless wiretapping, holding prisoners indefinitely and ignoring treaties (e.g., the Geneva Conventions) are high crimes.
Perhaps we should win the war being waged against our own Constitution.
In doing so, we can show the Iraqis how citizens can save their own country and salvage a victory. But we have nothing to show the Iraqis while we’re surrendering our own rights.

John R. Pack, Parker

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (90) | TrackBack

CU too well funded

I see that a one-year suspension has been recommended for Ward Churchill.
I think that the University of Colorado must be getting too much money from the state. Any research and educational organization that doesn’t react to such a significant number of falsifications and plagiarisms from one of its faculty, in the strongest and most forceful way, clearly doesn’t have the drive and desire to excel.
This being the case, I am no longer in favor of increasing the budget for CU. Let them receive donations from others, not my hard-earned tax dollars.

Scott Strohmeier, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Allard stands up for Americans

By voting “no” on cloture on the immigration reform bill earlier this month, Sen. Wayne Allard showed that he recognizes the sanctity of the law.
The day of that vote was a significant day in the fight against illegal immigration and against those who propose and support amnesty. Many scientific and governmental commissions over the past three decades have come to the conclusion that stabilizing the population of the United States is necessary in order to maintain our nation’s economic growth and prosperity. On June 7, one of our Colorado senators proved that he understands this necessity.
Many members of Congress feel that amnesty is the way to move America forward. Sen. Ken Salazar is one of them. Other senators believe that while the reform bill is not perfect, it is better than nothing. Allard proved that he is not among these misguided individuals.
Allard clearly realizes the struggles and challenges that face American families every day. Big businesses wish to import workers to use as slave labor, and foreign nations desire to offload their excess populations on our economy. Coloradans should thank Allard for standing up to both entities and standing up for all hard-working, patriotic Americans.

J.F. Meyer, Olathe

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (49) | TrackBack

Some things the gun story didn’t include

I had to laugh at the article “Mayors target guns database” (June 8). Why am I amused? Supporters cited in the article include the American Hunters and Shooters Association. This group with a name that sounds like it supports shooters and hunters is actually a front for several gun-control organizations.
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a known firearms hater and organizer of this campaign, has succeeded in recruiting 224 U.S. mayors, including Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper. What isn’t included in the article are the thousands of mayors who did not join or the mayors who did join but dropped out after seeing that this database campaign was nothing more than an advancement of gun control, not crime prevention.
As for the 33 national and state police groups said to support this campaign, I would like to see what the “beat cop” thinks of this. Not his puppet-stringed supervisors.
I hope in the future that the writers of articles like this in the Rocky take some time to research the source of the supporters or groups to see where they really stand. Good stories will be found there.

Todd Jacobson, Lyons

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (39) | TrackBack

Why can’t RTD board keep its promises?

In the FasTracks Annual Program Evaluation for the Gold Line, published on May 29, it was reported that: “The Gold Line Team ... eliminated diesel commuter rail from its evaluation late last year (2006) based on overwhelming support form the public for the electric commuter rail technology ... ”
Yet the Rocky Mountain News reported on that same day that the Regional Transportation District board now wants to use diesel technology for the Gold Line (“Diesel lines or electric? RTD divided/Board breaks with staff on upcoming FasTracks decision”).
The voters approved the FasTracks initiative with the understanding that the metro area would receive the same type of service at about the same time. Why are Arvada/Wheat Ridge being singled out to be burdened with a technology that is slow, loud and dirty in place of electric commuter rail technology that is fast, quiet and clean?
Does the RTD board just not pay any attention to its own consultants or the voters? What is going on?

William G. Ross, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Commuter interests in conflict with system

The next time you are sitting at a traffic light with no traffic on the cross street, ask yourself whether the government really does all it could to save fuel.
Are the lights timed to maximize traffic flow? Or are they timed to catch someone on camera trying to beat the light so they can issue a ticket and get some more revenue? Is government more likely to invest in maximizing the efficiency of any new system so that everyone gets to where they are going more quickly with less stop-and-go, or more likely to build a new lane for the 5 percent of commuters who car pool? Are they investing in a computerized system that maximizes the efficiencies of traffic flow or trying to legislate the laws of physics? Are they selling a new 19th century trolley system or considering how to allow individuals to maximize their time and productivity?

Steve Miller, Westminster

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Faulty upbringing

Seventeen-year-old Ponderosa High student Caleb Pegues lobbed an incendiary device toward a group of fellow students because he felt that their pro-marijuana rally was “stupid. I guess that is how I was raised” (“Was explosive a kid’s prank or a felony?” June 9).
Now Pegues faces jail time, and his parents face substantial legal costs, and they all seem to view themselves as misunderstood victims.
One can only wonder: What exactly in Pegues’ upbringing led him to believe that the correct way to respond to disagreements on social issues is to construct and hurl bombs at other humans? Perhaps the parents should spend less time feeling sorry for themselves and more time thinking about how they raised a kid who could conceive of such a vicious and stupid act.

Jon Richard, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (17) | TrackBack

June 18, 2007
Ward Churchill

Mike Durcan of Denver writes:

Does no one else find it curious that a CU sociology professor is defending Ward Churchill by declaring him to be so vastly superior to his many “critics". Those critics constitute a very large diverse group of people, the majority of which the professor has certainly never met. While not surprised at this type of of arrogance it is hoped that it does not show up in his academic intolerance. Oh, and there is that nagging issue for Ward of his research and teaching misconduct. Surely that is not why he thinks Ward is so superior.
Tom, I’m confident we will all survive your “immense loss’ at Wards hopeful departure. I must concede that of the five traits you attributed to him you were correct with one - he is original. Unfortunately the committee chose a different term - fraudulent.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:57 PM | Comments (24) | TrackBack

Harry Reid & Iraq

George Lilly of Denver writes:

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid recently, and inadvertantly, answered the question why Congress is still funding the Iraq war. He said that a bad outcome in Iraq will get more Democrats elected in ‘08. So where’s the moral high ground or changes from the status quo?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:56 PM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Al Gore’s book

Larry Bolt of Fort Collins writes:

To fully understand the dangers facing our country, I strongly suggest that everyone concerned read the new book by Al Gore, “The Assault on Reason.” Well-written, easy to understand, and more than anything else, a warning of the highest degree about the recent purposeful dismantling of our Constitutional foundation. From national to local leaders, this one should be required reading.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:56 PM | Comments (61) | TrackBack

Pinon Canyon expansion

Ambrose P. Rikeman of Aurora writes:

I wonder that the ranchers and farmers who are protesting the imminent seizure of their land to increase Fort Carson’s training area do not take advantage of their most obvious course of action. All they need do is secede from the state of Colorado, and petition to become part of the commonwealth of Puerto Rico. If they would only do this, they would have a flock of celebrities down to protest their treatment at the hands of the Army. After all, protests at the Navy’s Vieques bombing range drew dozens of celebrities, including such political powerhouses as Robert Kennedy, Jr., Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and Hillary Clinton. After these protests, the White House caved in and closed the entire base. There is no reason to believe that protests would be any less effective in eliminating Fort Carson, and opening up thousands of acres for development. Other advantages would also accrue to the new Puerto Ricans, such as remaining full U.S. citizens while paying no federal income taxes. Tourism would prosper, since they could legitimately show pictures of white sandy beaches in their brochures of Pueblo and Rocky Ford. They would retain representation, albeit non-voting, in the House of Representatives. Their only loss would be any voice in the Senate, not that the loss of Senators Tweedle-right and Tweedle-left should cause anybody much heartburn.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:55 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Ward Churchill

James Jones of Littleton writes:

CU Professor Tom Mayer wrote an impassioned letter here (7/8/07) in defense of Ward Churchill. Professor Mayer tells us that Churchill is a “profound, original, knowledgeable, productive and important” scholar although he didn’t get around to telling us why.
Apparently Mayer believes Churchill is persecuted for merely expressing his reflexive contempt for America by insulting the victims of 9/11. Mayer’s uncritical idolization is instructive.
His letter makes it clear that the hygienic procedures required to maintain intellectual integrity at CU are insufficient and need repair. Let’s hope the Churchill matter shines a brighter light on what’s going on in the faculty lounge.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:55 PM | Comments (17) | TrackBack

A DIFFERING VIEW: 2-pronged approach to education is vital

Educator Francis Wardle offered a thought-provoking Speakout column in the May 26 Rocky, “Einsteins in our midst?”

Everything he says makes sense. We should include many dimensions in education including the items he suggests.

Where his article melts down is his attack on teaching literacy and math, and testing for competency. It is not one approach or the other that is necessary; it is both.

For too long the schools fell down on the basics, so there needed to be a strong push for that essential aspect of education. At the same time, we need to nurture whole people and that means art, music, sports and vocations are just as important.

From what I can tell, Colorado schools are doing a pretty good job in all areas, and the CSAP has helped educators focus on an area that was slipping. Don’t throw it out. Keep it and keep the arts, too.

It is not a matter of time or money. It is a simple matter of balancing the curriculum and expecting educators to do their jobs instead of whining about having to teach literacy and math.

Steve Wille lives in Centennial.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Judge second-guesses Colorado voters

Well, I see another activist judge has decided that the people of Colorado cannot think for themselves.

Denver District Court Judge Christina Habas overturned Amendment 41, which was approved by a landslide vote of the citizens of Colorado (“Judge lifts lobbyist gift ban,” June 1). The judge ruled that the amendment has a chilling effect on free speech and association — which are code words in this instance for crimping the graft-giving and -receiving.

She advises that the measure has wording that is vague at best. Then she goes on to say that the measure went far beyond what was intended. If it was so vague, how does she know what was intended?

You cannot have it both ways, judge. I read the amendment at the time I voted for it. It was not vague to me then and is not vague to me now.

The amendment was read, voted on and approved by the voting citizens of the state. Give us credit here. We know a politicians’ pot-of-gold arrangement when we see one.

Jim Weber, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (22) | TrackBack

Farmers hurting while urban greenery thrives

My lawn is green, the greenbelts, parks and golf courses are lush, the reservoirs are full — everyone is happy, right? Not so! The state of Colorado is still refusing to let the 440 farmers northeast of Denver use their wells.

I do not know how many acres have been taken out of food production, but I do know there are 440 farmers in trouble because they cannot raise their crops (i.e., food) for us.

It is my understanding that the city of Highlands Ranch and the tolerant, progressive city of Boulder sued the state to shut down those wells and they refuse to compromise. They even hired people to check up on those farmers to see if they were using water to raise crops. Heaven forbid they would raise food!

All great civilizations destroy themselves from within. Where are we heading? The state of Colorado has put water for greenbelts, golf courses and parks ahead of water for food. I blame Gov. Bill Ritter and the state legislature for allowing this to happen and for doing nothing to help these 440 farmers.

Dan Porreco, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (16) | TrackBack

W. Colorado has saner approach to schooling

To those Boulderites who want sanity back in their children’s schools, come to western Colorado.

You won’t hear would-be professionals promoting healthy sexual relationships that include active experimentation in single, group, same-sex or any combination thereof, or equating casual and committed relationships.

You also won’t hear favorable references to psychologists “routinely” using the drug Ecstasy in their sessions, nor allowing the invitation for students to try it if they “had some” as the presenter stated he himself would like to do.

In western Colorado they would be thrown off campus as fast as their caravan could take them home.

I visited with a local superintendent of our local school system, and this concerned child activist was assured that our local schools have a rigid policy with regard to such topics, that the school system serves to protect the rights of children in their parents’ stead (rather than supplanting the parents’ authority), and furthermore that a mandatory STD class may be in violation of the students’ civil rights as well as a violation of state statute.

Betty Scranton, Glenwood Springs

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (21) | TrackBack

Citizens-only voting

There are thousands of illegal aliens registered to vote — and who have voted in our elections— even though, legally, one must be a United States citizen to vote.

The problem here is that Colorado does not require proof of citizenship to vote. Colorado will register people to vote with a cable bill, a utility bill, etc., as proof of residency.

The right to vote should be in the hands of American citizens and American citizens only. Only American citizens should decide America’s destiny. No foreign power should dictate America’s future. No person who swears allegiance to a foreign power should be allowed to vote in our elections.

Helen Loar, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (89) | TrackBack

Christo’s border fence

Forget finding a border fence, let Christo build one! This would accomplish several goals, and he could charge admission to view yet another masterpiece of contemporary public art.

A fence (my preference would be silk with lavender hues) would discourage border crossings (if his previous works are any guide) by the simple visual repulsiveness.

The Christo Line of Death would encourage tourism to an otherwise inhospitable land (think Area 51) and would provide a more pleasing work environment — with concomitant increased efficiency — for our band of Inspector Clouseaus currently on the job.

Patrick R. Ritchen, Brighton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Walk more, drive less

It is time for us to end our dependence on foreign oil and begin our journey toward the independence provided by alternative fuels for our automobiles. The time has come to support more walking and bus riding to implement this action. Only when we walk or ride the bus will the people who promote the rise in oil prices feel the pinch enough to make the changes needed to promote alternative fuels.

All Americans need to become more fuel-conscious, conserve, and care about this green planet. If you love the beauty of this world, support it by driving less and riding with others more. Your household budget and kids will thank you, as will the rest of the world that is still walking to and from work.

J. Serio, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (23) | TrackBack

Look what happened after the last amnesty

Have we Americans no pride? Look and wonder what happened to our beloved country when the government took our voice away and gave amnesty to the last million people a few years back.

How did they repay our good intentions and friendship? By overloading our school systems and still not learning the English language, by taking our gifts of free medical care, food stamps, low-cost and sometimes free housing, also using our Medicaid system even though some have not paid into the system.

Some don’t even pay taxes — this includes state and federal taxes — because they are paid under the table. But let one get hurt on the job, well, baby, they take our compensation system for a wild ride.

By the way, do we not know who pays for all those items listed above? I know and I cannot do any thing about it.

If anyone thinks anything different is going to happen this time around except more of the same, he is insane and needs immediate medical attention.

Dear Government, why not let the American public vote this time around for this broken system that you are trying to correct — you may be surprised at how mad we really are.

Jack Wedding, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (25) | TrackBack

June 16, 2007
DIA repairs

Leroy M. Martinez of Denver writes:

Six Millions Dollars to fix four bathrooms at DIA. Enough is enough.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Guantanamo

Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

Since the transfer of terrorist suspects to Gitmo, The Denver Post and Rocky Mountain News have been pressing for trials of the detainees, even to the point of suggesting that the subjects be given the rights of habeas corpus, as if terror suspects were entitled to all the rights of American citizens. Of course, this is nothing more than a political ploy intended to bash the White House. It is a lamentable fact that the press is more concerned about defending the terror suspects at Gitmo than supporting our troops on the field. As The Wall Street Journal aptly put it, “Alas, the only thing that matters to some people is that the Bush administration lose, even to terrorists.” Gitmo is a case in point.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (77) | TrackBack

Bob Beauprez vs. Paul Campos

Marcy Roeder of Nederland writes:

Bob Beauprez indignantly defends the integrity of a man who declared his intention to become a “war President” before he even took office, who has suppressed news about casualties in order to deflect criticism of the war he started, and whose administration has been derelict both in equipping soldiers for combat and caring for the wounded afterward.
According to Beauprez, Bush has “routinely” called on and comforted families of the fallen “and more.” This is patently false. George Bush has not attended the funeral of a single soldier killed in Iraq, nor has he ever greeted wounded soldiers on their arrival back in America. Early in the war the White House suppressed the publication of photographs of the coffins of deceased soldiers arriving at U.S. air bases in order to avoid adverse publicity. Bush has only paid attention to disabled troops, when he could engineer a “photo-op” for publicity purposes, like handing out Purple Hearts at Walter Reed on Memorial Day.
To top it all off, the Bush administration has worked assiduously to cut soldiers’ pay and benefits and has repeatedly extended their combat duty. To claim that this President actually cares about the men and women he sends off to fight and die merely adds insult to their injury.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Health care

Dr. A.J. Hill of Nederland writes:

Paul Hsieh declares that in Canada’s single payer health care system, medical decisions are made by “bureaucrats and politicians” rather than by doctors and their patients. This is false. In Canada medical costs are paid by the government, but doctors and their patients make primary medical choices, and Canadians are free to select - or to change - their health care providers at any time. Interference in medical decisions by non-medically trained “gate-keepers” is actually far more characteristic of the private insurance industry that dominates U.S. health care.
According to Dr. Hsieh the key to Colorado’s health care needs is the “free market” and the magic of “personal responsibility.” Never mind that these same principles have already given Americans one of the most expensive medical systems in the world (consuming more than 15% of our GDP) while leaving forty-five million of us uninsured and helping us to rank among the lowest 25% of industrialized nations in things like life expectancy and infant mortality.
Besides the amount of money we spend on health care, the U.S. ranks near the top in only one other category: physicians’ incomes. Funny that Dr. Hseih didn’t think to mention that.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (20) | TrackBack

Jason Salzman & protesters

Greg Nierling of Littleton writes:

On display in Jason Salzman’s column of 6/9 was one of the most pathetic, illogical arguments for welcoming destructive protesters (as is proved by their past actions in other cities) to the Democrat National Convention in the summer of 2008.
One first has to only look at the source of his pro-protester argument-Ben Cohen, a committed leftist.
But more importantly he goes on to say these protesters would “spend money” and thus be an economic boom to the area as a result.
What poppycock! Like most, if not all liberal arguments, it does not take into account the negative consequences. How about these to name a few. First, as is clear from results of these protests in other cities, these type of protesters are very destructive to property.
They smash windows, destroy other public property and tie up police resources that could be used more efficiently elsewhere.
Also they disrupt and may for a time, put legitimate businesses out of operation while the protest is taking place and the eventual clean up and repair of their businesses. Some economic boom!!!
Also, how about the longer-term negative consequences on future tourism to Denver and Colorado with the sight of these out of control protesters in the street?
Lastly, insurance companies will undoubtedly be paying some claims.
They in turn will raise premiums at some point to both businesses damaged and those not damaged. And as everyone knows-we all pay the cost of rising insurance.
But I guess common sense and rationality never has entered into the liberal argument and is unlikely to anytime soon.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (17) | TrackBack

Beauprez trots out discredited excuses

Blithely dismissing the lies and exaggerations the Bush administration used to inveigle the United States into the current disaster in Iraq, Bob Beauprez trots out right-wing talking points, as if these had suddenly regained credibility (“Ignoring the facts,” Speakout, June 2).

He refers to congressmen who “agreed” with Bush about the threat posed by Saddam Hussein, but neglects to mention the manipulation of intelligence reports that produced this consensus. He warns about “enemies of freedom” and Osama bin Laden’s “stated objective,” but either doesn’t know or doesn’t care what bin Laden actually said about his motives, which consisted of ejecting U.S. troops from Muslim holy lands.

He cites the arrest of terrorist wannabes whose schemes never got beyond daydreams, as if these substantiated a viable threat to our nation’s existence. Facts? My eye! This is nothing more than the same old Republican fear-mongering and I, for one, am “real tired” of it.

Dr. A.J. Hill, Nederland

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (25) | TrackBack

A dumb vote — no lie

How comical to read Jason Salzman’s dark speculation “whether [former Senate President John] Andrews is lying” with my admission that on the 2004 property tax increase bill, I and other Republicans fell for a misrepresentation and voted wrong (“Senate Republicans hardly duped in 2004,” On the Media, June 9).

What’s to lie about? A dumb vote is just that, and some of us were guilty. In the end, though, no tax hike passed the Republican legislature that year, whereas a big one passed the Democratic legislature this year, and Gov. Ritter signed it. Voters might frown on that in 2008.

John Andrews, Centennial, Former Senate president

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (14) | TrackBack

Pow! Wham!

That quote from the very first Spider-Man comic book that led off Dave Kopel’s On the Media column of June 2, “Talk-show hosts amok,” was very good, but check out this one by Mark Twain:

“In the first place, God made idiots. This was for practice. Then he made school boards.”

Does Kopel think Batman and Dick Tracy will support his efforts to “refocus” the Caplis & Silverman Show away from Boulder?

By the way, how many comic books did Kopel have to read to qualify as a media critic?

Patrick O’Connor, Castle Rock

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Campos mainstream? Don’t kid yourself

I have written previously, exclaiming how much I appreciate the Rocky Mountain News and how much I enjoy Vincent Carroll and numerous others.

While I am decidedly conservative, that doesn’t prevent me from enjoying liberal columnists such as Maureen Dowd and, yes, Paul Campos.

In his June 5 column, “Removed from reality,” Campos proclaims that 72 percent of the population is aligned with Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and — you guessed it — Paul Campos.

This is preposterous. Who are these people, this 72 percent? I only know six. I submit that Pelosi would have been destroyed by Bob Beauprez in a Colorado gubernatorial race and Pete Coors would be our senator had Ken Salazar run on the liberal record and statements of Harry Reid.

Campos is a radical leftist, out of touch with all save the progressive lynch mob in which he circulates. Mr. Campos, it is fine to paint your columns from a progressive position, but when you look in the mirror, don’t kid yourself — the mainstream isn’t what’s looking back.

Stan Byers, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (14) | TrackBack

When is enough enough for soldiers?

My brother has served in the Army since 2002 and is facing his third tour to Iraq in October. He is currently being treated for post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms he has exhibited since returning from his second tour in November 2006.

When he is redeployed, he does not know if he will continue to have access to his Zoloft medication or weekly talk therapy currently being used to treat his symptoms. Due to the extended 15-month deployments and his October leave date, he will be in Iraq for two consecutive Christmases.

When is enough enough? This war is being fought on the backs of our working class while the rest of America worries about gas prices and summer movie releases. When will the odds catch up with my brother as they have for so many other service members who return with brain injuries, amputations or worse? What will it take for the American people to demand an end to this destructive war?

While the Democrats and Republicans debate over which lifelong bureaucrat should limp into office to succeed the current underachiever, the American people need to make their voices heard.

Lisa Sevcik, Highlands Ranch

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (28) | TrackBack

June 15, 2007
Governor & legislature

Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

As Fr. Bill Carmody has aptly pointed out in the Rocky Mountain News, the Governor has failed to keep his word to the citizens of Colorado. Voters overwhelmingly showed support of traditional social values in the November election. Yet, the state legislature ignored the will of the voters by passing bills 1292 and 1330 for the Governor’s signature, in spite of the public outcry against the bills. We hope the voters will keep this in mind in 2008. The Governor and state legislature must be held accountable for their flagrant disregard of the citizens of Colorado.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (16) | TrackBack

Cindy Sheehan

Robert Lipton of Lakewood writes:

Of all the sad stories arising from the Iraq war, the Cindy Sheehan odyssey is perhaps the most pathetic (“‘You are not the country that I love’/Anti-war mom Sheehan submits resignation to American people on blog,” May 30).
It is amazing that after all the lionizing comments and supportive efforts of the far left, Cindy Sheehan was able, after many months, to see through the veil of purported sympathy for her and her position and realize that she was being used.
She is revolted by the political reality of zealots of left and right ignoring the national interest and fighting for their own gain. Welcome aboard, Cindy, even if your metamorphosis was long in coming. Most of us are revolted by the scene.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (35) | TrackBack

Archbishop Chaput & immigration

Jo Ella Hunter of Lakewood writes:

Providing a platform for the archbishop of Denver to speak out in support of Senator Salazar — a politician — and The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act — a political act — is an eye-poke to the citizens of Colorado who have but one vote, who have paid taxes over the years, and are capable of forming their own opinions on political matters.
Why, oh, why do you do it? It is just one reason why I do not subscribe to the RMN.
The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 does NOT deserve our support. The archbishop ought NOT to meddle in politics! Shame on the RMN.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Supreme Court vs. women

R. Kiefer of Arvada writes:

Either the Bush Supreme Court (collectively) doesn¹t have the sense God gave a goat , does not understand why our female citizens should have rights, or is just to the right of Atilla the Hun.
It ruled against a woman whose male coworkers were at the managements discretion, and unbeknownst to her making thousands of dollars more than she. Her pay was suddenly reduced, and she was not able to find out why, or that the salary of her male coworkers, no more experienced or qualified, was not affected until, that is, that the 180-day period for formal, legal complaint was exhausted.
Supposedly, it was her tardiness that the court ruled against, not the validity of the complaint. Does America need nine Supreme Court injustices to interpret a law that any eight-year old could read and interpret as long as no extenuating circumstances are involved? Maybe Mr. Bush¹s puppets wanted to make certain that that a female employee as compared with her male counterparts received her unjust deserts.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Immigration

Paul Buono of Denver writes:

While some may have been happy to see the immigration reform bill die in the Senate, the likely result is that our immigration system will remain unchanged at least until a new president is in office. It’s difficult to see who benefits from this.
The current system is obviously bad from a national security standpoint. There are an estimated 12 million people here illegally—meaning we don’t know who they are, where they are from or why they are here. The Senate bill would have corrected this. The Senate bill also mandated the hiring of additional border security agents, electronic monitoring of the southern border and additional fencing along the Southern border. None of this is likely to happen now.
The status quo is also bad for US workers, who now must compete against a pool of easily exploited illegal workers who often work for less than minimum wage and in substandard working conditions. The Senate bill would have evened the playing field between these workers and their American counterparts, thus ending the unfair competition that American workers now face.
The system is also bad for US businesses which, under the current immigration system, must contend with unreasonable amounts of bureaucratic red tape and extensive delays even to get the best and brightest foreign workers into the US.
Perhaps the only ones who benefit are those looking for a scapegoat on which to blame all social ills including crime, disease and environmental degradation. Had the Senate bill become law perhaps these people would no longer have been able to point their fingers at “illegals” and would have had to look for real solutions to social problems. Good for them, bad for the rest of us.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (64) | TrackBack

Unresponsive

On important issues such as immigration, it is essential that we have leadership that reflects the wishes of the people and considers the importance to the welfare of this country.

Since many of our elected officials no longer wish to represent us, act only in their own self-serving interests and have reduced us to being their wallet or pocketbook, is it time to put these issues on a national referendum?

We can no longer support a system that passes laws and then chooses not to enforce them, claims to act in our best interest but refuses to tell us the cost and long-term impact and expedites the passage of laws so that the full meaning cannot be determined.

We extend the opportunity to develop democratic forms of government to other nations of the world but seem to have lost the principles at home.

Jack Lintz, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (48) | TrackBack

Think gas is costly? Try that Starbucks

Buying a Sunday newspaper for $1.50 that a few months ago was $1 is probably the result of increased cost of newsprint, and management is attempting to maintain a certain level of earnings.

It was while reading this newspaper at Starbucks, after paying $1.57 for an 8-ounce cup of regular coffee, that the numerous articles about gasoline prices of $3 per gallon needed to be explained.

Gasoline inventories are at their lowest level in six years because refineries had been processing heating oil for East Coast consumers. They got a very late start in changing over to process gasoline, to build up inventories for the driving season, which refineries have always considered to begin May 28.

The other reasons for this shortage of gasoline are due to the shutdown of the refinery in Texas because of a fire, and also a crude oil shortage on the Gulf Coast because of a loss of supply from Nigeria.

This will not make consumers feel any better, but there are 128 ounces in a gallon, and that 8-ounce cup of coffee at $1.57 would make a gallon of coffee cost $25.12.

Therefore, the economic and safety issue is, “Don’t drink and drive, you might hit a bump and spill some expensive coffee.”

Doyle Grogan, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (61) | TrackBack

Untapped resource

The military needs soldiers. The illegals want jobs. ’Nuff said. And while we’re at it, let’s empty some prison cells!

Tom Zehnle, Morrison

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (20) | TrackBack

A DIFFERING VIEW: A timeout would not prevent all Roan drilling

We read with interest — but were not persuaded by — the Rocky’s June 11 editorial (“The Roan reaction”) opposing our efforts to seek a “timeout” of the Bureau of Land Management’s efforts to open up yet more of Colorado’s Western Slope to gas drilling — particularly the special unspoiled acreage atop the Roan Plateau
.
As the editorial said, the BLM’s plan for the Roan Plateau has been gestating for some time. But many of its provisions are being seen for the first time by the public. That doesn’t seem to us to be in keeping with the letter or spirit of the law, nor the right way to manage public lands.
While many Coloradans, including most if not all of the surrounding communities, have repeatedly said they support some drilling in the planning area of the Roan, a strong public consensus has been opposed to drilling on the top of the plateau.

The editorial goes on to suggest that our timeout is a ruse for halting gas development. Far from it. Anyone driving along Interstate 70 near Rifle or flying overhead can see the evidence of drill rigs lining the interstate and the base of the the Roan Plateau. In addition, drilling is already occurring on the privately owned acreage on the top of this plateau — areas not under federal management.

Our timeout is designed to allow a new governor and our fellow Coloradans an opportunity to take a closer look at plans to allow drilling on the publicly owned portions of the Roan, and to mitigate conflicts with other important resources and uses, like grazing, watershed protection, recreation, hunting and fishing. Annually, the Roan Plateau generates nearly $5 million for the local economy.

A one-year delay will also give us an opportunity to insist on other protections. The gas isn’t going anywhere, but the wildlife habitat, the sensitive species, and the beauty of this unique Western landscape could be lost forever. That seems worth a timeout to us.

Mark Udall represents Colorado’s 2nd Congressional District. John Salazar represents Colorado’s 3rd Congressional District.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Retire talking points

For years, President Bush and his enablers have been telling us we have to fight the terrorists in Iraq so we don’t have to fight them here. The stupidity of that statement should be obvious, but now we hear about recent terrorist plots targeting New York and New Jersey. Why can’t these Guyanese, Yugoslavians, Turks and Jordanians get with the program and go to Iraq? Maybe, like many Americans, they couldn’t find Iraq on a map.

It is high time to also retire another ludicrous talking point, that if we retreat from Iraq the terrorists will “follow us home.” Don’t you think the terrorists already know where we live? In fact, they are already here, and the debacle in Iraq has only increased the danger.

Fred Koster, Nederland

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (39) | TrackBack

Funny strategies

Al-Qaida tortures and decapitates civilians and captured soldiers and casually kills people by the hundreds in mass executions while we prosecute our troops when they overstep civilized behavior. Border smugglers kill civilians and shoot at Border Patrol guards and we prosecute the guards for minor transgressions on the testimony of criminals.

Perhaps the idea is that al-Qaida and border criminals will laugh themselves to death at our antic actions.

Robert Lipton, Lakewood

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (27) | TrackBack

They’re vandals

The prevalence of graffiti throughout Denver and the metropolitan area is disgraceful — yes, even disgusting. I don’t know the answer for prevention, but I believe one place to start is to stop calling them “graffiti artists” or “taggers.” The former name lends unwarranted dignity, and the latter implies a certain bravado and shouldn’t be used either. The only term used in reference to these criminals should be “graffiti vandals.” If they are caught, they should be punished as vandals, the same as if they had been found burning down a neighbor’s garage or fence.

Jeanette Murgatroyd, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Why didn’t caller act?

Concerning the two young children who drowned in a condominium community’s pool (“‘Now it’s a very sad life for them’/Pool victims had arrived in U.S. in ’06 from Ethiopia,” May 30): The Rocky Mountain News story states that a resident found the children in the pool, called 911 and firefighters pulled the bodies out of the water.

Why in God’s name didn’t the resident who called 911 pull — or try to pull — the kids out of the pool? Time is always important.

Leroy M. Martinez, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Enforcement the key

There is no immigration problem in the United States of America. What we have is a law enforcement problem!

If you illegally cross the U.S. border, you will or should be immediately arrested and deported. If you are an employer who hires illegals, you will or should be immediately arrested, fined and/or jailed. Is that so complicated? No!

The employers who complain and whine about a lack of workers will have to do just like the rest of us when we buy gasoline — pay up! It’s just supply and demand, after all. Well, the employers must do the same — pay a decent wage to available American or legal immigrant workers.

No amnesty, no political interference, no special-interest interference, no religious interference, just honest law enforcement.

Leon Rodriguez, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (33) | TrackBack

End the occupation

Hundreds of human rights and international governmental organizations (including Israeli and Jewish groups and the United Nations) and millions of people around the globe have called for an end to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem and for a just and equitable peace.

June marks the 40th anniversary of the ongoing Israeli occupation. Because the United States has played such a key role in supporting Israel’s illegal occupation — both financially and diplomatically — people in the United States have a special obligation to speak out and pressure our politicians to end their support for this unjust situation.

Julia Blechar, Louisville

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Even farther south

I disagree with letter writer Melanie Maish, who says America should send Marines back to the Halls of Montezuma and move the United States’ southern border to Guatemala in a spirit of reconquista (“Let’s just move the border to Guatemala,” June 4).

Isn’t Panama the shortest place to build a good fence for North America?

Steve Schweitzberger, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

The trouble with DIA

The official total precipitation for the Denver area for the month of May was 1.79 inches. This amount, of course, was measured at Denver International Airport. The core city and surrounding areas, being closer to the mountains — where people live and grow things — received a lot more ... closer to 4 inches in some cases.

Snow amounts are invariably lighter as the distance from the mountains is increased, so the year-to-date figure is off, too.

I can’t understand why the official measurements have to be made at the airport, while those closer to downtown, which reflect what really is happening, are not even considered.

Dale Major, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

June 14, 2007
Terrorism

K.A. Skala of Denver writes:

Reader McBrayer (The politically correct will destroy this nation, Letters, 6/8) berates a previous letter writer for suggesting (correctly) that it is “our (bi-partisan, irrational) actions that have fueled terrorism".
McBrayer lists a number of terrorist acts against us and asks which terrorists committed them. I remember specific countries where the terrorists originated for most but not all of those attacks. As far as I remember, though, none were from Iraq.
Now one question for reader McBrayer: what was the nationality of the uniformed terrorists who made the unprovoked air and naval attack on USS Liberty in international waters, killed and and maimed scores of U.S. Navy sailors and strafed and sank a number of its survival rafts when it appeared USS Liberty would sink to the bottom of the Mediterranean?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Bob Beauprez & the Middle East

Larry Marquardt of Lakewood writes:

Mr. Beauprez attacks the Left as a whole for faulty reasoning and ignorance of Islamism’s threat to global security. Radical Islamism is a very real threat to all people; our physical safety, and our liberties. Nevertheless, it was the failure of the current President to act on explicit warnings about immanent attacks given prior to 9-11, and the deliberate ignorance of Hans Blix’s clear statement that there was no evidence of WMD in Iraq, that led to his misadventure there. Also, it is patently false to assert that “most of the free world” agreed with the U.S. decision to go to war in Iraq.
No doubt it was that old Conservative bugaboo, the Liberal Media Conspiracy, that kept Mr. Beauprez in the dark about the massive, peaceful, ant-war demonstrations throughout Europe, and the reluctance of most of our allies to participate. The fact is that much of the so-called support for the war was based on opinion-poll governance, a propaganda coup that equated opposition to the war with disrespect for the troops, and an almost total lack of political spine due to knee-jerk paranoia about losing votes.
Americans have been aware since the 1970’s that politics in the Middle East will have a major impact on the world’s economy, yet politicians continue to favor oil and automobile companies with liberal economic policy, and most politicians apparently believe that the Middle East political situation can be manipulated to our advantage. That contradicts both our belief in the sovereignty of nations and common sense. At the same time, the response to bureaucratic failure has been to create yet another wasteful, ineffective bureau (Homeland Security). Where are the Conservative’s when you need them?
And why have they allowed this administration nearly carte blanche power to intrude upon our lives? Yes, it is a risky world, but despite some success in breaking up terror cells, which I admit may be due to increased surveillance, current policy for managing those risks has come at a high price in blood and treasure, and arguably destabilized the Middle East irreversibly.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Boulder High controversy

Steve Harmening of Denver writes:

normally mr. kopel makes a lot of sense but on this boulder high school, he’s way off and you guys are shamefully silent also. these speakers where an absolute disgrace in everything they said and if your neighbor would have talked like that to your daughter you would have punched his lights out. it just shows me, unfortunately, that all this anti-drug, safe sex talk is meaningless. the people of boulder should be tar and feathering these idiots and instead are just letting it pass.
maybe the next time some poor kid is killed in a car wreck involving drugs or alcohol you’ll think back to this shameful event.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (27) | TrackBack

Aurora police

James J. Tenant of Centennial writes:

The 6/8 Rocky Mountain News article, “Aurora police promotions eyed, Sergeant urges overhaul after he was passed over", is simply racism at its worst. AWOL/MIA from comments surrounding Sgt. Thomas Williams’ plight, are black Aurora City Council members, Deborah Wallace and Ryan Frazier. Denver City Council members Michael Hancock and Elbra Wedgeworth, couldn’t be found either when the stuff hit the fan, regarding Denver’s failure to recruit and promote blacks in their police and fire departments. I am no stranger to failing public sector job exams that have a 6-figure salary. Where’s the Denver/Aurora NAACP, when you need’em?
The Aurora city government, is at odds with President Bush’s “diversity” policy regarding blacks being utilized in potentially dangerous jobs. Bush wants to strike diversity from all federal funded jobs, contracts, and educational programs. However, to protect white folks blood and treasure, Bush is allowing all of my military service academies to have diversity plans, so more black officers can be subjected to combat situations. A version of U.S. Sen. Obama’s “Quiet Riot", is sorely needed in Aurora.
I’ve also been afflicted with the black public sector jobs exam flunking disease. I recently applied for RTD’s Safety Manager’s position, and I flunked the exam. I went one better than Williams though, I had a “10 point” disabled combat veterans preference going-in, derived from federal appropriation laws associated with the T-REX and Fas Tracks projects. I served for 23 years in the U.S. Navy as a steam propulsion engineering officer and shipboard CHIEF ENGINEER in 3 nuclear powered submarines, 4 surface combat ships, and 3 deployments to Vietnam.
I earned the following college degrees: MSM (Project Mgt.); MABA; BBA; and AAS. Additionally, I was formally trained in the following engineering disciplines: nuclear, electrical, chemical, mechanical, structural, fire sciences, and biological. I’ve worked as a global consultant and executive in the following industries: railroad; oil and gas; highway construction; telecommunications; surface and underground mining; and electrical power generation. I proudly join U.S. Rep. John Murtha (USMC Vietnam War-hero), “I wouldn’t serve in today’s armed forces with these guys and their deferments".

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

President Bush & VP Cheney

Jane Bourgoin of Denver writes:

I am appalled that Mr. Cheney and Mr. Bush are still in office after the “high crimes and misdemeanors” committed by the two of them. Waiting another year and a half for a natural “regime change” just may be too late! We need to take action now to prevent further destruction to our country.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (29) | TrackBack

Live and ... let live?

Letter writer Ray Coffman (“The root of all our ills,” May 31) recommends abortion as one way to reduce the population. In the very next sentence he says we should “live and let live.” How can someone hold these two thoughts simultaneously without blowing a “mental contradiction” gasket?

Clarence Manion, Lyons

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (82) | TrackBack

Let’s treat horses well

In response to “Horse slaughter not always a bad thing,” a letter published on June 5: Horse slaughter is always a bad thing ... particularly for the horse.
The argument that horse owners will be forced to abandon or neglect their animals without the slaughter option is not valid. Yes, it will cost a few hundred dollars to have a veterinarian euthanize the animal and have a recovery service take it away. However, it costs many times that amount to maintain a healthy horse for just a year. If someone can afford to keep a horse in the first place, they can certainly afford a humane end. If they cannot afford a humane end, they have no business keeping horses.
Even with the slaughter option, horses are abused, abandoned and neglected every day. So let’s just do the right thing for our equine friends.

Pam Levien, Castle Rock

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Chopper noise awful

Though not on the order of Iraqi deaths (a la the U.S. invasion and war) nor nuclear threats, loud motorcycles destroy the serenity when one has a chance to decompress away from the “madding crowd” — in cemeteries, on one’s front porch or balcony, at an outdoor celebration or enjoying nature.
I’m glad Denver has the courage to do something about it — congratulations City Council (“Law to muffle rowdy cycles,” June 6).
To smokers and other obnoxious people: Your rights stop where ours begin.

K. and L. Johnson, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (14) | TrackBack

Real Littleton friends will nix Wal-Mart

Littleton residents are being asked to support or rebuff their City Council’s decision to rezone part of Santa Fe Drive and the South Platte greenway for a huge 24-hour Wal-Mart store (ballot question 1A).
Wal-Mart has even started a faux grass-roots group called “Littleton Friends” to support this zoning. The issue here is clear: The City Council is out of ideas on city funding and have sold out to the highest bidder; to even consider such an eyesore is proof.
Real friends of Littleton appreciate the fresh air, mountain views and greenway bike and walking paths.
Real friends of Littleton expect traffic and environment reports to be made available on the city’s Web site (they aren’t.)
And real friends of Littleton are happy to leave the city limits to experience traffic jams and gross overdevelopment.
So, the real friends and contented residents of Littleton will vote “yes” to save the charm of our town.

Paul Trantow, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (17) | TrackBack

Alito’s provenance irrelevant to ruling

Bonnie Erbe’s May 31 column in the Rocky Mountain News, “Ruling an ill wind for civil rights,” is a terrific example of obfuscation via the red herring. She wrote critically about a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision denying Lilly Ledbetter’s claim of unlawful pay discrimination based on gender.
All five of my children are adult women, four of whom take home a paycheck. I’m not sure I know that each is or isn’t paid as well as a man doing the same work for each of their employers. I wish anyone honestly pursuing this matter well.
Erbe, however, leveled her fire at the author of the majority opinion, Justice Samuel Alito, and the president who appointed him, George W. Bush.
Alito sinned in Erbe’s view by applying federal law as written. She advocates the sort of all-too-common interpretation where judges advance sophistic arguments to make laws suit the policy preferences of the judge(s).
The red herring Erbe used is that “Alito’s judicial perspective is a remnant of the political past.” He was nominated, you see, by a president “whose popularity has been battered ... ” by his “now wildly unpopular invasion of Iraq.”
Only a Bush-hater would understand how this is relevant to a justice’s strict application of a law written by Congress.

John Dendahl, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (14) | TrackBack

Still mourning a son lost to sniper’s bullet

My name is Doyla Lundstrom and I lost my oldest son in Fallujah, Iraq, on Jan. 7, 2006.
I have not been the same since.
Luckily, my youngest son, who is in the Army, Spc. Edward Lundstrom Jr., made it home after serving a year there.
Both of my sons deployed within 18 days of each other. My Marine, Brett, on Sept. 18, 2005, and my soldier, Edward, on Oct. 6, 2005.
One hundred eleven days into Brett's deployment, his life was cut short by a sniper’s bullet to the back of his neck. He never stood a chance. He knew he wasn’t coming home, but he went anyway, because he had to.
June 12 would have been his 24th birthday.
The pain of losing a child is excruciating. Not a moment goes by that I am not thinking of my son. He was a beautiful child.
I want the president to know that I am very upset that this war is still going on and we are losing more of our babies every day. Every time I hear on the news that more of our kids were killed, I feel the same pain for another mother somewhere.
I wish he could feel the pain we do.
Every day when I would come home from work and there wasn’t a government vehicle parked in front of my house, I was ecstatic. That meant both of my babies were fine. On Jan. 7, 2006, I wasn’t home when they did come to my door.
It was a good thing that I wasn’t.
I am left with one son now who is still serving his country. He went back to war in Tikrit after taking two weeks of emergency leave.
He did what he wanted to, and so did my oldest son, but that doesn’t keep the pain away.
I am very proud of my two sons; they are my heroes.
Ask the president to bring our boys and girls home now.

Doyla Lundstrom, Broomfield

Editor’s note: See the Rocky’s coverage about Brett and Edward Lundstrom online at http://
www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_4405009,00.html and at http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_5135682,00.html.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (14) | TrackBack

Separation of church, state for thee, not me

If a person of faith uses her talents to bring attention to important issues, is this a violation of the First Amendment? On the contrary, it is a celebration of First Amendment rights — the right to free speech, freedom of religion and the right to petition for redress. The Rev. Leah Daughtry is using her God-given gifts to do what she sees as right to improve the world (“Pastor’s mission to bring ‘values voters’ into Dems’ flock,” June 1).
I wonder, however, how many people will attack her for violating the so-called wall of separation between church and state. Sadly, I believe that many who excoriate Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell will applaud Daughtry because they belong to the same political party as she.
For this country to be restored to the ideals and values that once guided us, we need to look beyond the good of a particular political party or religious organization to that which is good for the country.
As a Christian and a fiscal conservative, I know I can find much more in common with Daughtry than I find differences. The trick is to see where we agree, and then to see what we can do about our disagreements.

Kevin Snyder, Lafayette

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (26) | TrackBack

June 13, 2007
Abortion

Max Ernst of Arvada writes:

The last month has shown the Supreme Court to be nothing but a political body, and nominees who promise to respect precedent cannot be trusted.
Imagine you want to have your gallbladder removed. Your doctor determines the safest procedure for you, but because some people who aren’t doctors, don’t approve of ANY cholycystectomies, and won’t be in the operating room find that safer procedure “gruesome”, you must take a greater risk of hemorrhaging or being maimed. Your gallbladder will still be removed, just not in the safest way.
This is the logic the Roberts court just exhibited in their decision upholding the ban on intact D+E abortion. Supposedly the right to an abortion has not been infringed because you can still get one using a different procedure.
It’s like saying your right to vote is not infringed upon if they close all the vote centers in Denver and you have to go to Durango. You still have the right to vote, even if eventually the only vote center in the country is in New York.
For the first time, the Court permits congressional judgment to replace medical judgment.
The 5-to-4 decision in Gonzales v. Carhart, occasioned by a change in the makeup of the Supreme Court, illustrates how fragile reproductive rights are.
If you think private personal decisions are best made by women and their doctors, be sure to vote for a pro-choice presidential candidate next year.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:25 PM | Comments (101) | TrackBack

Unintended pregnancies & sex education

James Jones of Littleton writes:

Lizzy Annison, Colorado director of public affairs for Planned Parenthood wrote in her Web letter of June 5, “Unintended pregnancies, about a study from a leftist institute which concluded (big surprise!) that “abstinence only” programs are not effective in reducing teen pregnancies. Ms. Annison tells us that we should instead fund the Comprehensive Sex Education (House Bill 1292) legislation to combat the harsh reality that “Every hour in Colorado a teenage becomes pregnant.” One person an hour sounds like a lot. Actually it amounts to 8,760 people a year or about 0.0019% of the Colorado population of 4.7 million. Now of course each of the 8,760 cases is serious, but the numbers do not constitute the social crisis Ms. Annison intends us to buy into.
More interesting than the standard leftist fear-mongering is the planted axiom that the teen becomes impregnated because she did not understand how not to. Given contemporary culture, this is hard to imagine. And there are, of course, no studies offered to persuade us that teens in Colorado do not know how babies are made.
If Ms. Annison and her colleagues want to dip even more deeply into the public coffers, then it is incumbent on them to explain the extraordinary number of hours of classroom instruction they tell us are required to teach the young how to avoid pregnancy. Sex education is not, after all, an intellectual problem. In fact learning the techniques are considerably less challenging then learning to drive a car.
If it’s a question of teaching morality, then obviously the instruction is better left to the family. That way the schools can focus on teaching reading and science.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:24 PM | Comments (114) | TrackBack

Councilwoman-elect Carla Madison

Kevin Brauer of Denver writes:

Congratulations to Denver City Councilwoman-Elect Carla Madison. It has been a pleasure for many of us in Denver City Council District 8 to work with Carla on the Uptown Sampler, the Denver City Park Festival for the Arts, West City Park Neighborhood events and various Denver City Council issues including Zoning law in our neighborhoods. With Carla’s leadership the future of our district and the entire city of Denver is indeed brighter.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:23 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Gas tax

Jerry Heberlein of Parker writes:

Re: Road funding debate
Regarding the highway funding discussion, I suggest to our state law makers: Raise the excise motor fuel tax by an additional $.30/ gallon!
The state excise tax for motor fuels have not risen in over a decade, yet the cost of road construction or reconstruction has more than doubled over that same period. The tax should be keeping pace with the cost of road maintenance and be tied to the actual escalation of the cost of road maintenance. Our expectations of low excise taxes are out wack with the cost of road upkeep. The environmental conditions experienced in Colorado are arguably the toughest on road infrastructure in the country, yet we have the 29th and 35th lowest state excise taxes for gas and diesel (ie road funding) respectively, and they certainly show it.
The excise tax remains the fairest way to pay for road usage as the heavier, lower gas mileage vehicles will pay proportionally more tax/mile based on fuel usage/weight. Compared to tolling, a 3 ton SUV/pick-up currently pays the same rate as the 1.5 ton car based on cost /axle, yet the SUV/pickup arguably adds twice the wear and tear on the road. It makes current local tolling practices seem like a subsidy to the heavier 2 axle vehicles.
The cost of fuel did not deter road travel over the Memorial Day week end. It proves the additional .30/gal tax is a non-issue.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:23 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

The Rocky

Terri L. Thaler of Denver writes:

At the risk of sounding like a Negative Nellie I’m afraid I have to say that John Temple’s final inspiring words to 17 staffers leaving the Rocky Mountain News (Departing friends leave a legacy 5/26/07) did little, in my opinion, to encourage an optimistic point of view on the stability or continuity of the Rocky — or the newspaper business in general. In the distance I can hear a bell tolling and it makes me sad.
I can’t imagine starting my day without a REAL time newspaper in my hands — the kind I can read while slouched in my favorite living room chair or while perched at the kitchen table — where it’s no big deal if I drop a few crumbs or spill something hot or cold over words printed on PAPER.
Not only do I become unnerved at the thought of having to read my newspaper off a computer screen, but imagining the damage that would occur to that clever little electronic keyboard sitting below my chin, should I wish to munch on a cookie or sip a glass of wine while doing so, practically paralyzes my entire being!
Possibly, my anxieties over this issue have been overblown due to my having recently arrived at an age where we humans are generally known to think in negative terms just for the sport of it! However, my salvation might lie in the fact that I think quite highly of Temple and of the job he has done in overseeing the publication of the Rocky these past many years. So I’m going to give him and his remaining staffers a chance to continue their best efforts in maintaining the Rocky’s “ ... special identity as Denver’s primary source of local news” — not only to make their departing colleagues proud — but their devoted readers, as well.
I cannot afford to continue subscribing to your paper if I’m also going to have to pay some computer engineer to come to my house each day to clean out crumbs and sop up wet spills from my clever electronic keyboard!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:22 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Dave Kopel & Boulder High controversy

Percy Conarroe of Longmont writes:

As a media critic, Dave Kopel should be looking into the mirror. This is no more apparent than in his ON THE MEDIA column of 6/2/07, “Talk-show hosts amok,” wherein he tries vainly to defend a questionable sex-and-drugs panel presentation that occurred in a Boulder public school by silencing the messengers of protest, condemning them as outsiders whose free speech was “repressive” amounting to “censorious morality.”
Since Kopel possesses at least two conflicts of interest in writing on this subject—his offspring attends the school involved (so why not tie superlatives to the principal’s name?) and he is recognized as a libertarian whose goal it is to legalize most drugs—I’m flabbergasted that the Rocky Mountain News would allow him to use the OTM column in such a personally advantageous manner.
Kopel pooh-poohs minority rights by saying only one parent formally objected to the content of the guest-panel event. He admits that the presentation violated school district policy and says school employees were reprimanded, but doesn’t say as to what extent.
He slams two detractors (who are his peers) for “harping” on the need to protect the children by “arrogating” to \[themselves\] a decision that “properly belongs” to the school’s parents. But it is the school board with parental input—not the parents—that makes policy and controls all activities on school property.
Kopel scolds libertarian-nemesis D.A.R.E. for its “reckless exaggerations” (in pursuing its anti-drug policy) after he exaggerates that a criticism directed at a panelist was “literally true, but nearly libelous.” Rarely actionable, especially in public debate, libel is a serious charge that Kopel knows will have a chilling effect on public discourse just to mention it. He should apologize.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:20 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Salazar & immigration bill

Rhonda Roseto of Westminster writes:

Senator Salazar is quoted as saying that the failed immigration bill “would secure our borders, strengthen and enforce our immigration laws and provide a realistic solution for the 12 million undocumented workers in our nation.” Now here are Sen. Salazar’s votes on the amendments to that bill:
- SA 1158 would have allowed state and local law enforcement to pursue a person’s immigration status as a part of their daily work - Salazar voted NO.
- SA 1184 would have denied legal status to certain classes of criminal aliens including aliens deemed inadmissible or deportable as security risks (e.g., terrorists), aliens who fail to register as sex offenders, aliens convicted of domestic violence and crimes against children, alien gang members and aliens convicted of at least 3 DUIs - Salazar voted NO.
- SA 1197 would have required an illegal alien applying for legal status to maintain a minimum level of health care coverage - Salazar voted NO.
- SA 1234 would have denied to those illegal aliens granted legal status from claiming the Earned Income Tax credit on their Federal tax returns - Salazar voted NO.
- SA 1151 would have established English as the national language of the US government - Salazar voted NO.
- SA 1170 would have required voters to present a government-issued photo ID at the polls - Salazar voted NO.
- SA 1339 would have required that the US-VISIT entry-exit system be fully operational before the bill’s guestworker and amnesty provisions were “triggered” - Salazar voted NO.
Now you tell me how Senator Salazar really feels about strengthening our borders and enforcing our laws. Who do you think he’s looking out for?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:09 PM | Comments (83) | TrackBack

Bob Beauprez vs. Paul Campos

Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

I applaud Bob Beauprez for his excellent commentary in the Rocky Mountain News. His depiction of Campos as an “unabashed liberal” is an accurate assessment of the Boulder professor, who will stop at nothing to politicize the war, without regard to its consequences. Campos’ commentaries are nothing less than a show of contempt for this republic and the men and women serving in uniform. His recent column, “the elites’ war,” is a disgrace to all Americans who have served their country in time of war.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:08 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Crime in Aurora

Mark A. Golden of Aurora writes:

I thought Chief Oates has professed to the Citizens of Aurora that the crime rate in Aurora has drop during his tenure. In reading you headlines I have to wonder how much the drop in the crime truly is: Police seek serial robber, Police arrest gang member sought in murder, Village East bomb scare, Family man bandit nabbed, Police find burned 2 year old boy, Teen’s to be tried in mom’s slaying, Councilwoman faced with assault charge, Suspect in shooting of 4 arrested, Two arrests made in Hinkley party shooting, Police seek 3 men in home invasion incident, Police identify victim in fatal downing, SWAT standoff ends peacefully and the headlines continue and continue.
This does not sound like a City with a reduced Crime Rate; unless we were in the top 10 worst City’s in the Country and have gotten better. These headlines sound more like we live in Los Angeles, New York or Chicago and not in peaceful Aurora.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Congressional Democrats

Joseph V. Seifert Jr. of Colorado Springs writes:

We now live as the French did in World War II: We live with a Vichy Congress people who deal and actively work with our enemies, coming up with reasons why we have lost the war. Now we should become collaborators with the enemy or die.
We have a House leader who goes to our enemies country to work with them, we have a Senate leader who has proclaimed to all the world we have lost. We even have both House and Senate Vichycrats telling the enemy when we will surrender.
Yes we are now ruled by the Vichy. What next? People being held hostage to make sure people vote the way the Vichy want? Or maybe it will be Vichycrats welcoming our enemies as they march down our streets.
I say we deal with the Vichy the way the French did after the war.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:40 AM | Comments (15) | TrackBack

Illegal immigrants

J.M. Schell of Arvada writes:

Paul Preston (Letters, 6/07/07) is exactly right. Which is why, though I like their new coffee, I am boycotting McDonald’s and though I like their low prices, I am boycotting Wal-Mart, and though I like their prices and serving sizes I am boycotting Q’doba. All of these companies hire illegal aliens and put illegal alien customers’ needs above those of Americans.
Of course, lots of folks who’re far more sophisticated then me snicker at my (so far’s I know) one-family boycott. These are the same folks, typically, who venerate the bus and department store boycotts carried out by African Americans in Alabama and Mississippi in the 1950s and ‘60s, by the way. Though there’s no organization, I can’t possibly be alone, in my boycott and it’s only likely to grow as more and more real Americans get sick and tired of what’s going on.
Preston is right on a second count: we crank boycotters don’t need the government’s help. Government “help” is what caused the problem. And Bush and his friend Teddy Kennedy and our own Senator Salazar, author of the “Shamnesty” bill, are working hard to make the problem even worse for legal citizens and residents of America.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:32 AM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

War on terror

Tommy Holeman of Longmont writes:

While we assess what’s happening in the netherworld of Washington D.C, we the people are becoming more and more disenchanted with our so-called leaders.
We elected to change the dynamics of a one-party-in-control-of-all-three-branches scenario, but we apparently got shafted anyhow with new leadership-without-the-courage-of-OUR-convictions scenario.
If we don’t learn from the mistakes of the former USSR, we will soon follow them into oblivion.
The “war” in Afghanistan was the costly last straw for the USSR and Osama-Bin-Laden is playing the same game with us. And,unfortunately, it seems, he’s succeeding.
With the latest 100 billion approved for our little “war", that brings the total to over 600 billion, and that’s over and above the war departments’ budget that they claim is 23 %. (The number is considerably higher when you figure in how many other departments contribute to keeping the military afloat, eg; food stamps for underpaid troops families, housing costs ,fuel costs,maintenance scams and pork projects, to name a few) The actual costs have been estimated at closer to 50 % of our budget.
We can’t afford to keep the Military Industrial Complex in business.( Ike warned us of exactly this 50 years ago.) Unless , of course,you want to be like our ol’ buddies, the Commies, as well as make Osama a very happy man.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:31 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Racism & justice

James J. Tenant of Centennial writes:

Scooter Libby was sentenced to 30 months in federal prison, because he lied under oath, regarding his reckless and retaliatory disclosure, of CIA agent Valerie Plame’s identity. Libby got a free-pass on this national security compromise, which could have led to deaths of America’s international CIA operatives. Libby’s lenient 30 month prison sentence, smacks of USDOJ racism. U.S. Sen. Salazar, skipper, S.S. Amnesty, should investigate this miscarriage of justice.
Black Denver U.S. Marshal Benny Bailey (26 years service), also committed perjury. Bailey lied under oath about his consensual sexual affair with a white female alternate juror (Tim McVeigh OK City bombing trial). He was ratted-out by the woman’s husband. USAG John “Disco” Ashcroft, flew into a rage, when he was notified that a black man had placed his hands on a white woman. Shades of Emmett Till. Disco and Bush, mounted their steeds, donned their “white” cowboy-hats, and rode to this woman’s rescue. Their posse consisted solely of Denver federal judge, Ed “Pretty-Boy” Nottingham. Both Notty and Disco were political appointees of the Bush-clan.
Notty, Bush, and Disco, decided they would sentence Bailey to 6 years in federal prison, for his “nookie-gate. They emotionally and financially raped the Bailey-clan, when they also stripped this family of Bailey’s federal retirement benefits. They couldn’t get Clinton, so they lynched and water-boarded the Bailey’s. Clinton committed perjury, when he lied under oath about his sexual affair with Monica Lewinsky. Hillary and Chelsea were rewarded with an $8 million book-deal. Bush should immediately pardon Bailey, and pay him full arrears restitution with financial damages. Where’s Obama, Salazar, and NAACP, when you need ’em?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:30 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Wolves

Barb Adams of Parker writes:

Wyoming is our neighbor and we all must pay attention to what neighboring states are are doing if you care about wildlife and habitat for wildlife in the Western U.S.
Late last month, federal officials approved a wolf management plan for Wyoming very similar to those they had earlier rejected. The plan allows wolves to be shot on sight if they wander outside the protected areas of Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks and surrounding wilderness areas.
In another related development, a proposed federal rule change would allow Wyoming to kill wolves if they cause harm to wildlife — perhaps Wyoming legislators do not consider wolves as wildlife! Wyoming has a long history of intense hostility towards predators mainly because of its ranching history. Ranching and wildife can and should survive simultaneously but it requires a more modern view of protecting our predators rather than seeing them as “pests” to be exterminated! See www.predatorconservation.org.
Please speak up and write to your legislators and let them know you care about protecting our native predators such as wolves. These magnificent and unfairly persecuted animals should not be treated like diseased rats! They deserve our protection!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:30 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Ward Churchill

Steve Krebsbach of Englewood writes:

What’s worse than having a fraud like Churchill living off our tax dollars at our public state university? How about others like the letter writer, Professor Tom Mayer of the Sociology Department at CU defending him and calling him a “profound, original, knowledgeable, productive and important scholar"! I can only imagine that there are many other professors that feel the same way up there at CU, which just shows that although they may be smart, they certainly are not intelligent. Imagine the intelligence of this professor Mayer defending a fellow professor who has lied and plagiarized and then threatens and intimidates anyone who should call him on it. I’ll assume that Professor Mayer has been much too busy with educating our kids to catch up on the facts regarding Churchill’s idiotic behavior.
And then like a true, hard core liberal, Professor Mayer cannot come out and make a direct point but he would rather slam Hank Brown without mentioning his name.
Professor Mayer and others like him should be embarrassed and disgusted in having someone like Churchill as a fellow educator. I would hope that the professors at CU have more pride in their profession and in educating the students to put up with someone like Churchill. Professor Mayer and others like him at CU should show some intelligence and support the removal of this fraud from our fine university.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:28 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

CU double standard

I am still scratching my head over the University of Colorado panel’s recommendation to merely suspend Ward Churchill. If either of my kids plagiarized, made up their own version of history and turned in papers with outright lies, they would be kicked out of school.
How can teachers, who are the supposed role models for the students, possibly be allowed to get away with academic infractions that — if done by a student — would otherwise have serious consequences?
I agree with CU President Hank Brown that the man should be fired. Churchill’s multiple and severe infractions of what should be high academic standards cannot be tolerated.

Michele Austin, Englewood

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Reforestation bill will aid woodlands, youth

I would like to thank Rep. Dan Gibbs and Senate President Joan Fitz-Gerald for co-sponsoring HB 1130, a forest restoration bill. The bill, recently signed by Gov. Bill Ritter at a ceremony in Frisco, provides $1 million for forest restoration projects in response to the pine-beetle infestation.
The bill encourages the use of youth conservation corps accredited by the Colorado Youth Corps Association on these important forest restoration projects. Youth corps will work with in partnership with local, state and federal agencies to mitigate fuel buildup and replant forest areas to help prevent wildfires and erosion.
The 11 youth corps serving the state are thrilled to involve their 900 participating youth and young adults in this important work while offering them a wage and an AmeriCorps scholarship. Youth corps will help improve the health of Colorado’s forests and protect water quality for local communities while simultaneously training the next generation of natural resources workers.

Greg Clifton, Ridgway
Chairman of the board,
Colorado Youth Corps Association
Town manager, Ridgway

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Biometrics a solution to privacy concerns

It no longer takes a “rocket scientist” to prevent identity theft. All it takes is the common sense to take solutions already at hand and put them to use.
The solution to proof of identity lies in biometrics. For about $100, Joe Sixpack can buy a fingerprint scanner and prevent anyone but Joe himself from gaining access to his computer. That same device can help prove the identity of anyone. All it takes is a third-party repository to verify that the print belongs with the identity.
This is not a privacy problem but a privacy solution.
We already use third-party repositories (credit agencies) to verify that Joe has good credit. What we lack is a way to prove a person is really Joe. Without that, anybody can steal Joe’s Social Security, birthday, address and phone number and take advantage of Joe’s good credit. Worse than that, people can re-enter the country illegally after deportation, get a job using fake ID, etc.

Edwin R. Anderson, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Abortion ruling is no win for ‘pro-life’ side

It is refreshing to find valiant leadership in the pro-life community (“Abortion opponents blast Dobson,” May 24). Colorado Right to Life is that sweet fragrance of morality that this country has needed amid the stench of moral relativism that has abetted the deaths of 50 million American children since Roe v. Wade.
Focus on the Family and others are celebrating our Supreme Court’s recent ruling on partial-birth abortion while abortionists must be grateful. This so-called ban is nothing more than a public relations mandate for those bold enough to kill a baby under the brightest light. The “pro-life” justices ruled that the baby may now be dismembered no later than halfway through live birth rather than the previous three-quarters. In other words, “Stay in the shadows where your deeds are a little less shocking.”
This evil ruling will save not one child and no respecter of innocent human life should celebrate its adjudication.
All who know that personhood begins before leaving the purposed safety of a mother’s womb should rally around the likes of Colorado Right to Life and rebuke those who reek of moral compromise.

M.D. Bernhardt, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (51) | TrackBack

Light rail one answer to our energy woes

The Colorado School of Mines and Conoco Phillips recently held a public forum called “A Conversation on Energy.” Too bad our two resident conservative cranks, Jon Caldara and John Andrews, weren’t there, because a couple of salient points made throughout the conference were that we need to achieve efficiencies in our energy usage now and we need to start conserving more and driving less.
The continued support of a light-rail system in Denver would achieve both of these goals. These two cranks sit on the sidelines and lob verbal grenades at the cost overruns of this project and, certainly, they are alarming. But don’t forget: Our resident cranks and their ilk supported a frivolous war that has raised the cost of oil and building materials across the board. That isn’t the planners’ fault.
Too bad the cranks didn’t have the foresight to see that supporting public transportation across the board was a more reasonable response to the 9/11 attacks than inevitably getting mired in a quagmre in Iraq with no viable options or exit strategies.
It is time for the opposition to these projects to get out of the way or work toward a more energy-efficient future. Even Conoco Phillips sees that this is the wave of the future.

Tom Sabel, Lakewood

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (32) | TrackBack

Proclamation needed

It is great to have women and men like those involved with Recreate 68 teaching people what democracy looks like. The Democratic National Convention is a great opportunity for the people of Denver to have an open conversation with their representatives. There is no inherent conflict between the need for public safety and the right of the people to engage in peaceful protest. St. Paul, Minn., which is hosting the Republican National Convention has already passed a proclamation. Denver should also.

Barbara Cohen, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Wasn’t always this way

Applicants for food stamps must fill out a 21-page form? (“Food stamps unused in state/Red tape, shame, lengthy forms may be reasons,” June 5.)
When I was a member of the Denver Board of Social Services in the Webb administration, we monitored these types of bureaucratic nightmares to weed out extraneous, invasive and complicated wording on forms. What are the board members of the Hickenlooper administration doing about this?

Virginia L. Wielgot, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Mexican quandary

Regarding the boos given Miss USA Rachel Smith at the Miss Universe contest in Mexico City by Mexicans in the audience, this is nothing new. For years Mexicans have been conflicted; they wake up in the morning and wonder, “What shall I do today — hate the United States or emigrate there?”

John E. Dreier, Golden

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (28) | TrackBack

A DIFFERING VIEW: No need to rush leasing on the Roan

The Roan Plateau is a relatively undisturbed island of public lands amid one of the nation’s most active gas fields. Lands all around the plateau are available for oil and gas leasing, are already leased, or are currently being drilled or in production.

A biological hot spot, the plateau is one of Colorado’s most important places for rare and sensitive species, is home to large populations of deer and elk, and includes incredible backcountry. The Bureau of Land Management, which recently issued a decision to lease the Roan Plateau for oil and gas drilling and development, estimates the developable natural gas reserve over the 20-year plan as enough to satisfy the nation’s energy appetite for less than two months.

The Rocky calls the BLM’s plan “one of the most environmentally friendly blueprints imaginable” (“The Roan reaction, June 12), but the document itself concludes oil and gas development “would effectively eliminate wilderness character ... as a whole,” that “outfitters and the big game they hunt will be ... displaced” as will many backcountry and other recreational opportunities.

Although the plan would limit development activity to 1 percent of the public lands atop the plateau, over half the planning area is already owned or leased by the gas industry, where this limitation would not apply. And the Rocky’s claim that drillers would have to “restore their drilling sites to a natural state” before drilling elsewhere is a fabrication. Rather drill sites would have to meet two years’ goals toward a five-year standard.

There is no need to rush leasing. The “immense natural gas reserves” will remain where they are, for a year and longer, as the energy industry stays busy with the hundreds of thousands of acres already available, leased or under production. The reserves will still be there when rapidly advancing technologies allow extraction with less disturbance to the area’s public lands and public resources.

Pete Kolbenschlag lives in Paonia.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

June 12, 2007
A DIFFERING VIEW: Robber baron truth from the bottom up

Down with trickle-down lies! Vincent Carroll would have us believe that Hillary Clinton (tops in her Yale Law School class) is an intellectual lightweight because she made a negative reference to the “robber barons” (“Beneficent barons,” On Point, June 1). He would have us believe that some robber barons were great people because they created new wealth. What he doesn’t say is that it was at the expense of thousands of lives.

But consider the fact that the Soviet Union went from a feudal, agrarian society to defeat Hitler and put the first man in space in merely 40 years. By Carroll’s standards, Papa Joe Stalin is the greatest man who ever lived.

But I think not. FDR and the union movement from the 1930s through the 1950s created the great American middle class. They conceived an economic tide that actually did raise all boats. Long live percolate-up truth!

Dan Badger is a resident of Denver.

Posted by denver-admin at 05:30 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Immigration bill

Alex Gorsevski of Boulder writes:

Regarding Bill Riedel’s letter to the editor accusing Democrats of supporting the immigration bill as a way to import voters from Mexico (What Immigration Backers Won’t Say, 6/1/07), I wonder if he believes the White House’s support for the bill is because Bush also wants the Democrats to get more votes. It is unfortunate that many on the right are so politically polarized they fail to understand that it is corporate America and its subservient Republican politicians who are largely responsible for the massive influx of undocumented immigrants. While Democrats support living wages, Republicans consistently fight to keep the minimum wage down, enable corporations to move well-paying factory jobs abroad and diminish unions which fight for better wages. These are the ingredients necessary to bring in people from Third World countries.
I’m old enough to remember when a janitor or construction worker could support a family. Of course, forty years ago illegal immigration was not a large problem because native born Americans were paid a fair wage to pick up trash and frame walls, and Mexico was still a poor country. Those who criticize illegal immigration cannot have it both ways; either support the return of living wages and associated higher costs or stop comlaining about Mexican immigrants.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (38) | TrackBack

Council campaign

Joe Mauro of Denver writes:

The true colors of a candidate in the Denver District 8 City Council race are apparent. Campaign signs have appeared weekly like a plague across the district - in the public right-of-ways, on church and school lawns, and in the parks. Uninvited on private property, these blue and white signs litter vacant lots, construction sites, the homes of the elderly and frail, and other private property. Stickers now deface gas pumps, traffic signs, bus stops, and light poles.
The bully tactics, described by the campaign manager as “aggressive campaigning” are no more than political graffiti. The scarce resources of Neighborhood Inspection Services, Parks and Recreation, and the City’s other maintenance crews have been stretched thin trying to meet citizen demand for the removal of these illegal signs. Trashing an entire district with campaign signs is serious enough but worse is the attitude from the campaign headquarters: “This is how it’s always been done", “The City will take care of the problem” and “If you mess with our campaign, there will be trouble".
City ordinance clearly defines where signs can be placed and in a letter from the City on March 23, 2007, these rules were clearly laid out for all District 8 candidates. This intentional disregard of the laws and the misuse of precious City resources to clean up her mess is irresponsible, blatant, and criminal.
The very worst part is that the candidate, Sharon Bailey, is asking for votes to uphold the City’s charter and laws and to maintain the integrity and beauty of our neighborhoods - all while trashing the district. Shame! Is THIS who you want on City Council?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Poisons

Charles Barton of Englewood writes:

How many POISONS are they going to put in our toothpaste, water, etc.?
First was the rat poison/insecticide known as fluoride. The FDA finally recognized that it was poison, so they required a DO NOT SWALLOW label.
Now it’s anti-freeze in toothpaste. You know what happens when your pet laps up some anti-freeze when a neighbor drains his radiator: kidney failure.
But the European Union says it’s all right. They are the ones who made coins with so high nickel content that the coin handlers are being poisoned from it.
Aren’t we glad they have such high standards?
Remember, the Chinese are the ones who brought us the poisoned pet food.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Country Club Gardens development

Bill Morrison of Denver writes:

On May 31st my wife and I attended a meeting hosted by the Broe Company regarding their proposed large, intrusive rental property development at the Country Club Gardens. The Broe people gave a brief history of the project which was that the Country Club Gardens is zoned R-3, the developer in 2001 signed an agreement with the City and Landmark Commission to save a few buildings and some flowers but now Broe has carte blanche to do what ever he wants. The impression was given that the developer could care less about the neighborhood concerns regarding the increased shading from the larger buildings, and traffic and parking problems.
Also, the neighborhood should feel fortunate that a larger more intrusive rental property development wasn’t being built. People in the area have expressed concern since 2001 about the potential traffic and parking problems, but the developer has not even bothered yet to conduct either an environmental impact or traffic study. We are affected everyday by the overflow parking from Broe’s rental property at the Country Club Tower. Right now Ogden Street is so narrow and packed with cars that two SUV’s are not able to pass each other at the same time. Perhaps some evening out of curiosity the developer could drive around the area about 6:30 pm to see how many parking spaces are available. As proposed having up to another 500 cars vying for limited parking in the area is very irresponsible.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Paper or plastic?

Jo Ella Hunter of Lakewood writes:

John Cardie (Environmentally friendly? Pick plastic, 6-2-07) argues that plastic is the better environmental choice for the shopper. He could have suggested Bring Your Own Bags as an even better option. Plastic bags can be stored in one larger bag, or in a tissue box, and reused many times.
String bags can be had very inexpensively online, and stores like Vitamin Cottage sell sturdy bags and synthetic stuff bags. Want to reduce your carbon ‘bagprint’? Turn down a bag whenever possible.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

President Bush & VP Cheney

J.G. Martinez of Brighton writes:

First of all, George W. Bush as a duly elected President. There are 18,000 votes still missing in Florida and secondly, in Ohio alone, there were plenty of voting machines in predominately Republican areas but not enough in Democratic areas.
Those in Democratic areas had to stand in the rain and cold for hours and poles closed. Not sure what happened in other States. So in my thinking both elections for President were a farce. George W. Bush wasn’t duly elected and dosen’t have the mental capacity fo serve as our President. He is a joke. Ask the rest of the World.
Even though the Congress authorized Goerge Bush to go to war, it was based on a bunch of lies by he, VP Cheney and their cohorts. These lies and trumped up intelligence were used to get Congress to agree for war. Where are the WMD’s and the proof of Sadam being involved in 911. George Bush did it for Daddy. How many of our young people have to die for his lies?
Look at what is going on in the Justice Department, what does that tell you about this guy. Also what about this guy wanting to establish an American Union with Mexico and Canada. He selling our Country done the tubes with this and Free trade agreements. He only wants to protect the wealthy since he dosen’t know what it’s like to work for a living. He even made a joke of the National Guard.
Maybe if he and VP Cheney served in the military they would not have approved torture. Daddy got George out of the war and Dick Cheney had 5 differnents.
What leaders we have. Again I say how many of our young people have to die for these two?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Ward Churchill

Ken Bonetti of Boulder writes:

The delusions of CU administrators and its apologists are truly breathtaking.
To hear it from them, judgment was passed on Ward Churchill’s alleged plagiarism and fabrication. Faculty Council chair RL Widmann crows, the process was “absolutely fair.” The guardians of academic integrity at CU bravely defended academia against horrific fraud and abuse!
Back in the real world, there is one simple reason Ward Churchill may be fired. He wrote his infamous 9/11 essay. Recall, some pundits and politicians didn’t like what Churchill said and demanded he be punished.
Rather than stand up for free speech, cowardly CU administrators complied. Charges of ‘research misconduct’ were concocted to facilitate the hack job demanded by those who detest Churchill and the First Amendment. Churchill was judged ‘guilty’ after a lengthy ‘investigation’ of some footnotes.
Unfortunately for the deluded, Cornell University expert Eric Cheyfitz showed the official report to be a fabrication, itself a fine example of research misconduct. Several CU faculty and others have since filed charges against the committee that wrote the report. The CU administration will likely weasel out of hearing those charges, but the Cheyfitz piece will be valuable evidence in the court action that is sure to follow if Churchill is dismissed.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Diabetes

Ingrid Warden of Golden, chair of the Education and Public Awareness Committee of the Children’s Diabetes Foundation at Denver, writes:

Subject: Comment on “Missing diabetic man’s body found in canal” in response to the following Associated Press news story:
GRAND JUNCTION A body found in a canal Tuesday morning was that of a missing diabetic, Mesa County sheriff’s officials confirmed.
Coroner’s officials were still trying to determine how 20-year-old John Atchley died. He was last seen May 19.
His father, Randy, said John Atchley was an insulin-dependent diabetic who only had a 48-hour supply of insulin with him.
More than 50 relatives and volunteers spent Memorial Day searching for the missing man without success.
John Atchley was last seen leaving a party.
Witnesses have said he was walking in a “dazed state.” A jogger found the body near Grand Junction shortly before 7 a.m.


“KNOW THE SYMPTOMS. SAVE A LIFE!”
Witnesses in this tragedy reported that the young man was seen walking in a “dazed state” prior to his disappearance. It is important to recognize that people who have diabetes and are experiencing a low blood sugar may exhibit symptoms similar to intoxication. Symptoms of low blood sugar can include the following: combative, shaky, slurred speech, confusion, and unconsciousness. Notice that these symptoms are similar to a person who is intoxicated. Sugar is the main energy source for the brain and if the blood sugar is low, the brain does not work normally.
If these signs are present and a diabetes ID is located, firmly encourage the person to take some form of sugar. A regular sugar soda or juice can be lifesaving. If they resist treatment or are unable to respond appropriately, call 911.
The Education and Public Awareness Committee of the Children’s Diabetes Foundation at Denver promotes public awareness of symptoms of diabetes and provides information to schools about diabetes care. For additional information on diabetes, visit the Children’s Diabetes Foundation website at www.ChildrensDiabetesFdn.org.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

‘Scooter’ Libby

Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

In view of the facts in the Lewis “Scooter” Libby trial, the failure of President Bush to pardon Libby is incomprehensible. Last month the Special Prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, submitted a brief to the court asking that Libby should be sentenced for a crime that neither he nor anyone else were accused of committing. Is this justice? On the contrary, a sentence based on such lack of evidence undermines the fabric of the American trial-by-jury system. We hope the president will see this travesty for what it is and pardon Libby. The facts demand nothing less.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (23) | TrackBack

Education reform

Kurt Cecil of Lakewood writes:

The recent travesty at Boulder High School underscores the urgent need for education reform in Colorado. Very few parents of teenage children think it is appropriate for their sons and daughters to be experimenting with drugs and sex. The failure of the Boulder High School faculty and staff to shut down that assembly immediately when the first panelist encouraged sex and drug use among high school students makes blatantly obvious that our children’s minds are not safe in public school.
The parents of school age children have been held hostage by the public school system long enough. The public education machine uses scare tactics and dishonesty to fight true school choice. They infer that the money belongs to the public school system. Yet, the source of the revenue is taxes, which are paid by the very parents who are then forced to either send their children to public school, or pay a second time to have true school choice. The worst is that the very people who most need true school choice are those who cannot afford it.
It seems ironic to me that many of the people who support a “woman’s right to choose” to end the life of an unborn baby do not support a mother’s right to choose where her own children are educated. It is time for this hypocrisy to end. True school choice must be enacted in Colorado immediately. It is time for the Colorado Legislature to support low income families and the right to choose by providing vouchers or tax rebates to parents who do not utilize the public school system.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Hypocritical politicians

James J. Tenant of Centennial writes:

These screaming politicians should come-clean. They are divided on “amnesty” for criminal illegal Mexicans, however, when they were given their pardons by Carter, their silence was deafening. They were also silent while gays were serving in their stead, in Vietnam. No outcry was detected either while 55% of the “soldier draftees” killed in Vietnam (in-country) were black, while we only comprised 12% of the nation’s population. I got a gift from Carter too. Unlike Colin Powell who lied when he stated he never benefited (promoted to full colonel on Carter’s watch) from affirmative action (AA), Carter gave me a AA commission as an officer in the U.S. Navy, where less than 2% of the officers were black.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Photo of soldier

Kathee Jones of Golden writes:

The eloquent photo of Sgt. Ryan with the photo of his baby daughter, Leia, took my breath away. It has brought tears all morning. The photo is a heartbreaking masterpiece, although I am so, so sorry for the occasion to take it. What a particularly powerful reminder of the terrible personal cost being paid by military families. And we should continue to be reminded — each of those numbers in the news every day creates a loss such as this. Best wishes to Amber and Lea Baum as they work to move forward with their lives. Their sacrifice goes so far beyond words, but I am grateful for a photo that cuts straight to the heart, demands contemplation and prayers.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Denver Zoo tragedy coverage

Ron Brown of Windsor writes:

I was reading the article on Ashlee Pfaff and the Jaguar attack, and I think it is appalling that you would have a small picture of Ashlee Pfaff and a large picture of the Jaguar. I know it wasn’t the Jaguars fault but Ashlee Pfaff is a human being and deserves more respect.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Vincent Carroll & Howard Zinn

Travis Schriner of Strasburg writes:

Would somebody please inform Vincent Carroll about the fact that we live in the United States of America? This fact entails an inalienable right to things like a well-regulated militia, the freedom to practice religion and, most important, free speech.
In America, we have the right to believe whatever ridiculous notion we get inside out itty-bitty heads. From creationism to communism, we can all believe whatever we want.
If Howard Zinn wants to investigate the 9/11 Truth Projects’ claims, I say God bless him (“A baleful influence,” On Point, May 22). Even though Noam Chomsky has rejected the claims as preposterous, they are still no more unfathomable than Jerry Falwell’s belief that 9/11 was caused by feminists and pagans.
Welcome to America, Mr. Carroll. Your freedom of expression is free of charge.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Gas prices

Delina Blanchett of Arvada writes:

I think it’s remarkable that the moment there is any news anywhere, that a refinery has had a fire or something gas prices at the pump go right up. I think that’s gouging, plan and simple and I wish Congress would investigate it, and have the oil executives come to DC and testify UNDER OATH!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Lesson of Vietnam is one of leaving too soon

In his May 29 column, “The elites’ war,” Rocky Mountain News columnist Paul Campos refers to the Vietnam War and makes a comment about losing face. Vietnam and Iraq, linked all across the political gamut, are deeper than simply a warning about losing face.
There are many legitimate, free-market, discourse-of-ideas arguments regarding the entry and exit of Vietnam and Iraq. We can discuss the tactics and strategy of being there, how the authority and responsibility is turned over to our allies, and how much Congress supports the ally after leaving. As a Vietnam veteran, having been there, and realizing the will of at least the leadership level of the people wanting freedom, I am well aware of the resulting messes.
Thousands of our allies in Southeast Asia were put into “re-education camps” by the communists, and now the world knows that 2-plus million were killed by the Cambodian communist Khmer Rouge.
Yes, the emotions of Campos’ ex-student — whose Marine boyfriend is being deployed to Iraq — are awful. But worse emotions will befall the civilized world if we cut and run. Vietnam’s lesson is not of going, but of leaving too soon.
I know Paul Campos is a caring man, civilly and intellectually engaged, because he met with part of our caucus when I served in the Colorado Senate, but on the cut-and-run issue he is in error.

Bruce E. Cairns, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (68) | TrackBack

It’s DeGette herself who won’t face facts

In her May 26 Speakout column, “Abstinence programs useless,” Rep. Diana DeGette referred to President Bush’s policies on abstinence education and stem-cell research as sticking his head in the sand “when presented with evidence contrary to his preconceived ideas.”
It seems this analogy applies to her policies as well.
She champions government funding for embryonic stem-cell research as the remedy for countless diseases when nothing has come of this research from the private sector. If investors, who may or may not care about the ethical issues surrounding this research, do not elect to fund embryonic stem-cell research, why should the taxpayer, especially when many of us believe it is morally unacceptable?
On the other hand, adult stem-cell research has yielded more than 70 therapies for many illnesses and diseases. Seems to me this is a better investment all the way around.
But, perhaps DeGette’s position and passion on this issue stems (pardon the pun) from her ideological ideas on the value of every human life at every stage of development. Whose head is in the sand?

Mary Pott, Golden

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (23) | TrackBack

A referendum on nuclear weapons

It’s time for a new national debate on U.S. nuclear weapons policy. The Colorado congressional delegation should lead the way.
The Department of Energy has proposed renewing the Weapons Production Complex to enable the production of 125 new nuclear weapons per year by 2030. Most polls suggest citizens would feel safer in a world without nuclear weapons. Former secretaries of state and defense are calling for a world free of nuclear weapons. But this new nuclear weapons complex is already in the appropriations pipeline.
Citizens who are being asked to pay the lowball budget figure of $150 billion should be included in this debate. It will cost a lot more both in taxes, environmental pollution and loss of any real progress on the nonproliferation treaty goal of elimination of these weapons.
The coming election of a new Congress and president in 2008 should also be a referendum on our nuclear weapons policy. Every candidate should be required to take a clear stand on this issue.

Bob Kinsey, Denver and Edwards

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Keep the heat on Denver Public Schools

I ask the Rocky Mountain News to please keep the heat on Denver Public Schools until some real revelations and reform have taken place.
The public needs to understand that schools are going to have to close so that the district can maintain its pension plan. The facts of this debacle have been hidden in the district’s refusal to disclose “personnel” information. But I have confidence that the Rocky will expose anyway that myriad administrators have retired after serving DPS a brief period of time (five years) and will receive lifetime benefits. Others bought “years of service” so they didn’t have to work out the years represented by their pension benefits.
I am also confident that, sooner or later, the Rocky will expose the fact that, dollar-for-dollar, the pension plan serves mainly administrators, not teachers.
Thank you, Rocky Mountain News, for your continuing efforts. They really are appreciated.

Kathy Hansen, Bailey

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Dubious philosophy

In his recent Speakout column, “Einsteins in our midst?” (May 26), Francis Wardle made some recommendations for producing original thinkers like Einstein.
One of them proposed that our schools teach a positivist philosophy which grounds students in “a healthy scientism that argued that if something cannot be observed, it must be doubted.”
Since his proposed philosophical framework is unobservable or scientifically testable, by its own standards it must be doubted. David Hume’s and the positivists’ philosophy is self-contradicting.
Finding ways to enable students to think for themselves is a laudable goal. Teaching students to think within a self-contradicting philosophical framework does not seem to me to be the way to get there.

Michael Jenulis, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (41) | TrackBack

Ringing hollow

Bob Beauprez’s June 2 Speakout column, “Ignoring the facts,” highlights the distorted thinking of a George Bush apologist.
Predictably, he attacks the patriotism of those who criticize “The Decider.” According to Beauprez, just because our president authorizes torture, secret prisons and warrantless wiretaps of American citizens, we shouldn’t be so critical of him. After all, he’s doing these things to protect us from the terrorists in our midst.
Like a loyal Republican, Beauprez did his level best at fearmongering, but his arguments are starting to ring a little hollow. Maybe that’s why, as is listed in his tagline, he’s a former member of Congress. I expect there will be more of you in the not-too-distant future.

Mike Dubrovich, Parker

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Blatant ‘minority-ism’

I am amazed at the blatant racism or “minority-ism” in Rhonda Hackett’s Speakout of May 18, “Affirmative action still needed here,” particularly in the example of supplementing “oral for written applicant testing in those cases where pen-and-paper exam unfairly biases against minority applicants.”
I am not aware of a minority whose members have an inherent inability to take written tests.

David F. Robinson, Centennial

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

June 11, 2007
Paper or plastic?

Albert H. Woehrle Jr. of Centennial writes:

John P. Cardie’s statement in the June 2 issue of the Rocky Mountain News was interesting exposition of the merits of plastic bags versus paper. Plastic decomposes more slowly than paper but plastic is more efficient in all other aspects of total energy calculations. But too much discussion of once through uses. It would be better to go to the store with your own reusable bags to avoid the “paper or plastic” question.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:03 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Motorcycle noise

Mike Nelson of Denver writes:

As a resident of Denver, officer of my local neighborhood organization, and avid motorcycle rider, I am writing this letter to urge the Denver City Council to vote against the proposed amendment to the municipal code regarding vehicle noise.
While I appreciate the motivation for the change in the code, I have a few issues that I feel need to be addressed: 1) Whenever you give the power of “reasonable suspicion” to a law enforcement officer, you are giving that officer a legal power that is open for abuse. I have no doubt that you have heard the term “driving while black” to describe the racial profiling that often occurs to African-American drivers. You also need to appreciate that motorcyclists are often profiled as lawbreakers due simply to their appearance and reputation, justified or not. This type of loosely defined ordinance gives an officer legal “cover” to harass otherwise law-abiding citizens.
Current noise ordinances are at best selectively enforced (the number of “noise ordinance” violations during Cinco De Mayo celebrations as one example), and are already an easily abused tool.
2) What system do we have in place to check the legality of a muffler system and issue the required permit? For example, I have a motorcycle with an aftermarket muffler system that is well within the current legal range of sound. If this ordinance passes, I will be in violation of the law, not for the volume of my motorcycle, but because I lack the proper stamp.
3) Will this ordinance be enforced on automobiles as well? As written, it certainly applies equally to all motor vehicles, even though the existing federal standards require cars and light trucks to adhere to lower levels than motorcycles. Many of these vehicles are in violation of the existing noise ordinances, but are seldom cited.
4) The existing federal standards call for the noise level to be measured at 50 feet. Why is the Denver ordinance requiring a measurement at 25 feet?
5) Will the city be providing the extra training needed for police officers to be able to recognize excess noise, or a modified exhaust system? If so, how will we pay for this training? Our neighborhood organization has been told explicitly by our council members that there isn’t enough money in the budget to properly enforce the speed limits on our residential streets. I resent that the limited budget would be further stretched for enforcement of an aesthetic problem over safety issues.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:02 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

The Rocky & Memorial Day

Diane Ware of Centennial writes:

Memorial Day is a day to honor those who have sacrificed all so that we might enjoy all the freedoms that this country offers. We made a special point to remind our teenaged son of what this day signifies.
How sad that the Rocky Mountain News chose to focus two front pages (News and Sports sections) on the Boulder Boulder. I’d much rather have seen the faces of those who have died for our country or those honoring them than happy runners and a father and son painted blue.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Immigration

Brent Nelson of Denver writes:

Create a department of peace, give illegal immigrants the ability to due a public service job for two years to earn their citizenship. An Americorp or PeaceCorp type duty funded out of the military budget. Of course there has to be a strong disincentive for employers to hire illegal immigrants.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:59 PM | Comments (21) | TrackBack

Health care

Gina M. Liggett of Denver writes:

The four initial proposals selected by the 208 Commission on Health Care Reform recommend greatly increased governmental control of health care in Colorado. Few people would argue against the Commission’s sound “Guiding Principles” for improving the health status of Coloradoans (e.g., the plan must provide high quality care, be financially viable and emphasize prevention).
But the biggest surprise is that the Commission’s eleven Evaluation Criteria required that the proposals offer only specified government-oriented methods for reforming health care. Free-market proposals couldn’t possibly have had a chance.
For example, the only way a proposal received a “high” score on the criterion of “Access” was to “Increase Medicaid Provider Participation AND Serve Geographically Underserved Areas.” On the criterion of “Coverage,” a high-scoring proposal must “Require purchase of coverage AND Subsidize coverage AND Ensure availability of coverage” OR “..provide direct coverage to all..through a single-payer system.”
These mandates built into the Evaluation Criteria and thereby into the selected proposals dictate the who, what, when, where and how. This disqualified any free-market-oriented solutions.
I only wonder why the Commission bothered to solicit various proposals in the first place. They had already designed their first choice, and it’s called “Socialized Medicine for Colorado.”

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:57 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Ernest E. Valdez of Thornton writes:

He is no-where to be found, at least not where President Bush looks for him.
He hit us and he hit us hard almost six years ago and he is still out there. Sooner or later he will hit us again. Meanwhile he has this country where he wants it, bogged down in Iraq where he can get to our soldiers. He has done a good job at it too, almost 3,500 of our best soldiers and cost us hundreds of billions of dollars. More important to him perhaps is that now we are a nation divided. And we may not have seen the worst of it yet. Lucky old devil we had no business in Iraq.
Osama had a master plan on how to destroy a super power but without such luck. First he brought us the 9/11 disaster, then Bush retaliates by going after him in Iraq of all places. Osama beaming with his new found luck obliges by sending bomb experts there to kill and maim our soldiers. To add to our demise, Osama and his Al-Queda big wheels can recruit at will from through out the Middle East to fight us the invaders. So these insurgents, as we call them, keep coming out of the wood work to play a deadly game of hide and seek in their own backyard with our soldiers. Al-Queda has had plenty of experience in this type of warfare after all they got the mighty Russian military to retreat from Afghanistan with their tails between their legs much like we did with our quick exit from Viet Nams.
Thus, it now appears that the end of 2008 will come and go before we are able to have any relief from seeing the suffering that families go through as casket after casket arrive in this country from Iraq. As a matter of keeping his spirit up, President Bush likes to say that Osama bin Laden is hiding in a cave somewhere. He may be hiding in a cave, but from that cave he has brought all kinds of chaos to us and the Bush presidency. But what the heck in a couple of years Bush will be in his ranch in Texas far removed from the hellatious eight years that a man named Osama brought to him and our beloved country.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:56 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Big Oil

G. Mantey of Denver writes:

Remember how the Vice President had an energy meeting with oil company executives? The Amercian people were left completely in the dark as far as who attended or the content of the meeting. Oil executives are writing our energy policy. Remember that Bush and Shooter are oil men first and foremost. Also, remember that oil executives were brought before congress after Katrina, but weren’t forced to take an oath, even though baseball players were forced to take an oath at the steroids hearing.
WTF??????????

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:55 PM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Sexual abuse

Carol K. Wilson of Golden writes:

Before I start let’s get this straight: GOD did not make Male heterosexuals to use their own little girls as sex slaves or to rape any other females (young or old). GOD also did not make homosexuals to rape males (young or old). It is against GOD’s law. Rape is evil. It is time for all of our public officials to unite to protect our children from all pedophiles and/or predators.
According to the Darkness and Light Organization:
-- An estimated 39 million survivors of childhood sexual abuse exist in America today.
-- 1 in 4 girls are sexually abused before the age of 18
-- 1 in 6 boys are sexually abused before the age of 18
-- 1 in 5 children are solicited sexually while on the internet Even within the walls of their own homes, children are at risk of sexual abuse.
-- 30-40% of victims are abused by family members (Some fathers, grandfathers, etc. rape their own little girls)
-- Another 50% are abused by someone outside of the family whom they know and trust.
-- Approximately 40% are abused by older or larger children whom they know.
-- Therefore, only 10% are abused by strangers.
Sexual abuse can occur at all ages, probably younger than you think.
-- The median age for reported abuse is 9 years old.
-- More than 20% of children are sexually abused before the age of 8
-- Nearly 50% of all victims of forcible sodomy, sexual assault with an object, and forcible fondling are children under 12 Most children don’t tell even if they have been asked.
These molestations lead to Health and Behavioral problems; drug and/or Alcohol problems; Teenage Pregnancy and Crime.
Most perpetrators don’t molest only one child if they are not reported and stopped.
Nearly 70% of child sex offenders have between 1 and 9 victims; and at least 20% have 10 to 40 victims. An average serial child molester may have as many as 400 victims.
For a lot more information info. And how Darkness to Light can help innocent victims of child molestation - call 1-866-367-544. Their web site is: darkness2light.org.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:52 PM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Gas prices

Dr. Cindy Massey of Littleton writes:

Asking if anyone should look into the gouging of gas prices is outrageously ridiculous that it’s even in question. It’s an obvious answer and it’s strictly an investigation, that’s all, to see what’s actually going on and to then take action. So many Americans are distrustful of the inflated prices, and at the very least, it should be checked into for our peace of mind. We are also struggling, many of us, and are at least very affected by these prices. It’s a no brainer that this investigation should be done.
To not act on it, would need a major explanation as to why not. I’m all for getting people to use less gas, but that’s another issue and still we are cornered into this position, thanks to other things which have governmental influence. More work should also be done in getting us out of this dependency, instead of saying a few false words and doing fake actions to get us to shut up for a while.
But getting back to the main point, it shouldn’t have to be our signing a petition to get our government to hold an investigation on gas prices, it’s a major issue, it should be something that’s just done.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:51 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Immigration bill

Dr. K.A. Skala of Denver writes:

A man being checked for a cracked rib turns out to have serious drug-resistant tuberculosis.
Bush had the chutzpah to assert that the scheme he is pushing to legalize the Mexican invasion “isn’t amnesty.” For one, it would give amnnesty to upwards of 12 million people — many from areas where illnesses eradicated in the U.S. are still endemic — for not submitting to the medical check required of every immigrant. This significantly increases the probability of reinflicting those diseases on the United States.
The politicians who concocted this scheme with input from some Mexicans but without any from the majority of Americans are obviously more concerned about the problems of Mexico than of the United States. Yet all of them swore to defend the United States. Therefore: shouldn’t they be not only impeached, but indicted for conspiracy to commit treason?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:51 PM | Comments (55) | TrackBack

Bob Beauprez vs. Paul Campos

Don Altman of Denver writes:

Mr. Beauprez opinion expressed in Saturday’s paper offends me in a manner that he professes to be upset with Mr. Campos recent statements.
The former gubernatorial candidate claims that it is difficult to have a legitimate debate on coping with the enemy. Why? Perhaps because people as Mr. Beauprez express themselves with loaded words, which negate objectivity.
Allegations as Campos being infuriated. Did Mr. Beauprez have a private audience with Mr. Campos? What was printed in the May 29th article can under no sane reading be judged as the expression of an infuriated person. And what about the other loaded words Mr Beauprez uses, “fabrications, temper tantrum, fantasies, spew his hatred".....ad nauseum. Yes, Mr Campos injudicious use of the term serial killer describing the president of the United States is also counterproductive.
Mr Beauprez complains that he’s tired of the blame America first crowd. I infer from this that what he is really complaining about is someone taking a position that runs counter to his opinion. What has made our country great is Freedom of Speech, lively dissent, varying positions. And when these differences are expressed, they earn respect when not couched in the kind of loaded words that were used by Mr Beauprez. and his eagerness to dismiss the legitimacy of an opposing position.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:50 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Boulder High controversy

George H. Waayne of Golden writes:

Dave Kopel’s commentary, “Talk-show hosts amok” exhibits a real stretch of logic to suggest that “If most parents aren’t upset, why do Caplis, Silverman carry on so? Without detailing the many pitfalls in that kind of thinking, I will try to rethink the question. Do we allow only parents to determine how our children are educated? The answer is no! “It takes a village"! The last time I looked Boulder was part of Colorado. When student at Boulder High are being misled about drugs, sex and other kinds of deviant behavior, we as citizens, Caplis and Silverman included, have an obligation to let the sunshine in and expose those responsible. After reading Kopel’s article, I shudder to think what he has written in the 10 books he has authored.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:50 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Rocky Flats

Judy Helen Padilla (no hometown provided) writes:

THE ROCKY FLATS LEGACY
Written on Memorial Day 2007

Just west of Denver where Golden’s foothills slant,
Stood nuclear weapons site-Rocky Flats Plant.
There loyal Americans toiled day and night,
To fight the Cold War at the Rocky Flats Site.
They followed procedures, these brave Dads and Moms,
To manufacture triggers for America’s atomic bombs.
When working with dangerous nuclear radiation,
The best defense available is Time, Distance, and Shielding.
(Time) means long exposures to penetrating ray.
(Distance) means how far it is away.
(Shielding) What’s between you and the source.
Including the knowledge of the energy’s force.
Our dosemetry badges were tracking our dose,
So we didn’t worry about details like those.
Penetrating beta, gamma, and neutron rays,
Were just typical hazards in those manufacturing days.
But now those records are lost, miscounted, or both,
And we are sick with cancers and have lost all our hopes.
Some of us are bankrupt with medical bills.
Others suffer from all kinds of physical ills.
But NIOSH keeps saying “We counted all that we got.”
“And your dose reconstruction wasn’t AS LEAST LIKELY AS NOT!
“You can’t argue with science, even if it IS bad”
“You can’t live forever, so go home and be glad.”
“At NIOSH we gave you our best ESTIMATIONS.”
“So call up the morticians for burials and cremations.”
The President had no kind words to soften,
The sad realization-No Flags on our Coffins.
Yes, we sick Cold War Veterans did our patriotic duty,
We even had Q clearances for National Security.
To protect America, we laid our lives on the line.
And gave to our country the BEST of our time.
We sacrificed our health, lives, families, and today,
You slap our faces with YEARS of delay.
Excuses and guesswork and pure false deduction,
How much more of graft, greed, and corruption?
We are free to speak because of Americans who died.
Now we are dying, because of NIOSH who tried
To side-step the issues of insufficient data,
And tell us that our lives just do not matter.
Yes, we are just statistics to you smug, arrogant guys,
But from this experience, at least we got wise.
To ALL nuke workers, we say BEWARE!
When you need your Government’s protection,
Guess What? IT’S NOT THERE!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:49 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Taxpayers also have a say about high school

Rocky Mountain News media critic Dave Kopel’s June 2 commentary about the controversial Conference on World Affairs panel discussion at Boulder High School, “Talk-show hosts amok,” is disappointing.
As a Boulder High School parent, Kopel must be aware (if he pays any attention to what goes on) that Boulder and the CWA embrace all manner of loopy liberal ideas, but are very closed to any alternative thoughts and certainly any presentation of such thoughts. Just try to conduct a panel on a conservative subject at either the CWA or Boulder High School. Wouldn’t happen.
As a Boulder taxpayer, I am affected by the products of the left-wing Boulder High School education. Thus, not only do parents have a say about the kinds of things that are not only tolerated but encouraged by the far-left leaders of that school, but so do I.
That there is limited reaction among parents means little. Parents only have marginal impact on their kids at the high school age. When the school finds such behavior acceptable, that far outweighs what the parents think. Besides, few of these parents exercise any constraints anyway. They’ve given up.
I thank Dan Caplis, Craig Silverman and Bill O’Reilly for bringing attention to the kinds of things that have become the norm at Boulder High School. Since there is no adult supervision at Boulder High School, someone has to take action.

Don R. Sherwood, Boulder

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (30) | TrackBack

Caplis, Silverman should be applauded

The required sex/drugs assembly at Boulder High School with the so-called panel of experts proved one thing: Liberalism truly is a mental disorder.
Dan Caplis and Craig Silverman should be complimented, not chastised, for exposing and pursuing this issue and the pathetic school district officials who condone this kind of absurdity (“Talk-show hosts amok,” On the Media, June 2).
I’ve listened to many of the recordings and the responses by the school district officials and their mysterious change of heart (they were against it, now they are for it) and I find it very sad and disturbing this kind of thing was allowed. I suppose this should not be a shock since this happened in the People’s Republic of Boulder.
Rocky Mountain News media critic Dave Kopel’s assertion that Boulder High is more tolerant than the average high school is obviously true, especially when it comes to deviance and lack of respect. If an assembly were held there that promoted owning and responsibly using a gun, the school superintendent and principal would be fired and a protest march would be held.

Michael Meyer, Parker

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (31) | TrackBack

Intelligent discourse

I’d like to extend my thanks to Rocky Mountain News media critic Dave Kopel for an intelligent defense of the Boulder community (“Talk-show hosts amok,” On the Media, June 2). Intelligent discourse trumps drama kings and yellow journalists every time!

Cynthia Stephens, Boulder

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Oil companies are not the real culprits

I just wanted to respond to Kevin Watson and his letter to the editor in the May 17 Rocky Mountain News, “Greedy oil companies.”
It’s not the oil companies! The oil companies don’t set the price — the world oil market does. Can Watson not see this? The oil companies pay to find it, extract it, refine it and get it to you, but they don’t set the price. The oil companies make about eight cents profit on each gallon. When the people of this country buy about 350 million gallons a day, the profits do tend to mount quickly.
Now let’s look at who really makes a profit off gasoline. It’s someone who isn’t involved in exploration, extraction, refining, transportation or sales. They don’t have to pay a dime to get it to your car, but they have a hand out for about 50 cents a gallon. Yes, that is your government at work!
Now, who is raping whom?

Hallett Newman, Las Animas

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

The SUV is doomed

I thought American society was beginning to embrace the environmentalist philosophy. But after reading the May 22 article, “SUV sales up despite gas prices,” it is plain that the philosophy applies to “the other guy.”
In the meantime, people continue to buy and drive these “pigs” as if there was no end to crude oil supplies. Contrary to what the quoted analyst Alex Redmond believes, the SUV will go the way of the dodo bird. Just check your local junkyards and count all the wrecked SUVs sitting there.
Good riddance to the SUV.

Dean Manfrin, Cañon City

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (45) | TrackBack

Truly grateful for those who defend U.S.

We commonly sing the first verse of our national anthem at the start of sporting events but seldom, if ever, hear the magnificent words of the other poignant verses.
Reflecting recently upon the meaning of Memorial Day, I truly appreciate these touching words from the fourth verse: “Oh! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand/Between their loved homes and the war’s desolation.”
I truly am grateful for those that have, and continue to sacrifice so much to protect our beloved homelands from the horrors that others would inflict upon us. I know that freedom isn’t free; it will continue to be paid for by the suffering of those in our armed services and by the pain of those who lose loved ones in this great service.
Whenever we hear our beloved national anthem, may we always take a few moments to truly appreciate what we have, and why we have it.

Dale Buechele, Centennial

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Who won in Iraq?

Chicken Littles unite!
Almost since the war in Iraq began, the Democrats in Congress have said and done whatever they could to strengthen the morale of the insurgents, and to weaken ours. Why, just recently, Sen. Harry Reid upped the ante by claiming the U.S. has now “lost the war in Iraq.”
If we choose to ignore Gen. David Petraeus’ more-positive assessment, and assume what the senator said is true, then who won? Al-Qaida? Iran? Sunni terrorists? Which group of insurgents and their supporters, all of whom share the same ideology responsible for the nearly 3,000 deaths on 9/11, did we lose to in Iraq?
Don’t hold your breath waiting for a straight answer. They’ll just keep telling you the sky is falling, and leave it at that.

Richard Colwell, Parker

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Other grandparents

Congratulations to Dick Cheney and his daughter Mary on the birth of her baby. If Iraqi grandparents have time to pay attention to such things, they probably are envious that Grandpa Cheney doesn’t have to worry about his new grandson being murdered by an American bomb falling out of the sky or soldiers bursting into his home looking for “insurgents.”

Juan Alberdi, Conifer

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

A DIFFERING VIEW: Odd that Rocky should object to a ‘nuisance’

It is interesting that the Rocky Mountain News editorial board would call legitimate protest a “nuisance” (“An abuse of protest,” May 26). The act considered by the jury (of putting dog feces in a political mailer and leaving it at the office of Rep. Marilyn Musgrave) deserves the same constitutional protections that the Rocky enjoys.

Also, the Rocky’s choice of terms is ironic in light of an important decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that still serves as the basis for these protections, particularly as they apply to newspapers: In 1931, the court struck down a Minnesota statute that made it possible for the government to declare a newspaper a “public nuisance” and permanently enjoin it from any further publication.

This decision might seem like a “slam dunk” today, following a series of important court rulings that further define our protections for free speech and press. But back then, the Minnesota Supreme Court upheld the “nuisance” statute, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision came in a split 5-4 vote.

Democracy can be messy, and one person’s (newspaper’s) protected speech can often be someone else’s (government’s) nuisance.

Vern Keel is a resident of Denver.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

June 10, 2007
Iraq war

B. Stuckey of Denver writes:

According to The Denver Post, the Congress would “be on a firm footing with the American public” by undermining the war effort in Iraq. On the contrary, nothing could be further from the truth. Wars have never been popular with the public, but that is hardly a sound premise for abandoning our mission in Iraq, as liberal Democrats would have it. President Roosevelt did not regard public polls as the basis for conducting war, as defeat was not an option in World War II. Our objective was nothing less than victory. Should President Bush be any less dedicated to the cause of freedom? The facts would indicate a resounding “no.” It is, after all, our freedom which is at stake, call it what you will.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (15) | TrackBack

Parolee housing

James Jones of Littleton writes:

The director of the Colorado Criminal Justice Center has identified our latest “crisis” (Burt Hubbard, 5/28/07). Apparently only about 75% of the 6,600 parolees in the metropolitan region are living in permanent housing.
The other 25% are judged to be living in temporary housing because their address is shared by another parolee. We’re not told what percentage of parolees are required to be in permanent housing to halt the crisis (perhaps 90%) but an accompanying article but Jeff Kass provides insight.
The Kass story reports on the plight of a 44-year-old former drug dealer who is living in a Salvation Army shelter. The former drug dealer is awoken at 5.30 am, goes to another shelter at 6.30 am for a free breakfast and then to yet another shelter where he showers and makes his daily phone calls. The problem is that he has to be back at the Salvation Army center by 3.30 pm to secure a place for the night which makes it difficult, he tells us, to find a job.
The former drug dealer claims he is grateful for a place to stay, “But you shouldn’t put people in a place like this.” He goes on to complain, “Its like we’re a step behind already, and then they put us two more steps behind.”
This “crisis” then appears to be not so much inadequate housing, not to mention board, but the lack of personal responsibility. Our former drug dealer obviously does not comprehend that it is him, not us, who put him in the shelter and that it is him, not us, who puts him two steps behind. When he comes to realize that it is him, not us, who is responsible for his own life; he will begin the road to happiness.
But what of the 75% of the parolees who do live in permanent housing? We don’t know much about them because the newspapers are not interested in their story - they’re able to look after themselves without making excuses.
I hope someone tells our former drug dealer about personal responsibility being essential to happiness. He won’t learn the lesson by reading the newspapers.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Piñon Canyon expansion

Kennie Gyurman of Model writes:

The Colorado legislature and Governor Bill Ritter have given their support to the people and groups opposing the expansion of the “Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site.” They did this by passing HB-1069 with an overwhelming majority of votes in favor of the bill. Representative John Salazar and Representative Marilyn Musgrave have also stated they are opposed to the expansion. We thank every organization and everybody who has given us his or her support in opposition to this expansion. Now we need Senator Ken Salazar and Senator Wayne Allard to publicly oppose this expansion. The Army has stated they will not use condemnation to obtain land needed for the expansion. Then they said they may use it. Senators Allard and Salazar have both stated they are opposed to the Army using condemnation. Both Senators need to tell the Army that if they use condemnation that they will oppose the expansion and refuse to fund it in congress. This would make the Army live up to its word about not using condemnation. We need to keep this part of Colorado as it is. The property owners in the proposed area of expansion should not have to live under the fear of having their land taken for any reason for an expansion that could be done using land already owned and controlled by the federal government.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Ward Churchill

Marilyn B. Reynolds of Loveland writes:

What would CU do to a student who was found to have committed plagarism and who made up history and presented it as fact? I know, in my day, that student would have been expelled. Ward Churchill was found to have done these things. Why is the investigating committee not recommending firing him? By not doing so they have put CU in a very bad light. If behavior such as this would not be tolerated if done by a student it most certainly should not be condoned by a professor who should be held to a higher standard.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Jerry Falwell & Moral Majority

Robert E. Forman of Lakewood writes:

According to a post “from the web” as printed in the Monday, May 28, 2007 edition of the Rocky Mountain News, someone named “Tom” claimed that Jerry Falwell and his Moral Majority “set back social progress in this country and made us a moral and intellectual laughingstock of much of the rest of the world.”
Here’s a clue: Most of those who think of themselves as being wise are foolish; most of those who think of themselves as moral are immoral; and most of those who think of themselves as being intellectual are anything but — and “Tom” is no exception.
Jesus Christ himself stated that the road to hell is very wide and that many (most of the world) will take that road, while the path that leads to heaven is narrow and only the few will take that one narrow path.
Homosexuality is part of the wide road that leads to hell. Abortion is part of the wide road that leads to hell. Evolution is part of the wide road that leads to hell. Enablers who condone, encourage and teach pro-homosexuality, pro-abortion and pro-evolution are on that wide road to hell.
Only those who believe in the Word of God (and Christ is the Word) are on the narrow path to heaven.
Those on the wide road to hell naturally scoff and laugh at Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and James Dobson (just to name a few) just as about 4,300 years ago Noah’s neighbors scoffed and laughed at Noah.
But in the end, no one was laughing when God saved the few that believed His Word and drowned everyone else.
Jesus Christ himself stated that the End Times would be just as it was in the days of Noah. And “Tom’s” world-view proves that to be absolutely correct. And just like Noah’s neighbors, “Tom” and the world don’t understand that they are completely wrong and “Tom” and the world won’t accept that they are completely wrong until it may be too late — and the door has closed and any chance at salvation has passed.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (33) | TrackBack

U.S. & Europe

Susan A. Schiller of Denver writes:

The G-8 Summit is taking place as I write this. I understand that the US is unwilling to go along with the recommendations of most of the European nations to make significant reductions in greenhouse gases and take other necessary steps to recognize the seriousness of the global warming catastrophe which is the major issue facing the world today.
The Russian and Chinese administrations have questioned the position espoused by President Bush about the need for a weapons shield in the Czech Republic and Poland to head off any attempt by Iran or other hostile nations to attack Europe. If the seriousness of protecting Europe is of such a high importance why has this issue not had a thorough debate in the US Congress? Is this another issue that was slipped in a bill without the members of Congress reading the full text?
Here we are in the year 2007, and the United States is trying to protect Europe? Didn’t we do that in World War II? The economies of most of the European nations today, especially those in the European Union using the Euro as their currency, are experiencing a high quality of life for their people. Why is it that the US needs to protect Europeans? In some trade transactions, in fact, the Euro is being considered above the Dollar as the currency of choice.
We are waging a war in Iraq and in Afghanistan and find we will be facing other major crises with immigration, trade, maintaining a middle class society that provides health care for its citizens, and the present Administration is worrying about protecting Europe. What is wrong with this picture?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Archbishop Chaput & immigration bill

Karl H. Low of Denver writes:

I could not help but having to answer his Eminence’s letter. He is clearly most interested in a for the Catholic Church’s positive outcome of the present discussion about immigration. His and the church’s interest are clearly twofold. It is to make sure that his flock will increase in size as much as possible. This means financial gain and political power for the church as those that are involved are mainly associated with the Roman Catholic faith.
At issue is also his own status as having sworn sworn alliance two a foreign potentate, the pope, who is also the political head of the Vatican State. Having done so, he must be aware that he may have forfeited his US Citizenship. He is also most likely acting as an agent of a foreign power and as such is most likely to have registered! However, his Eminence has also an tax exempted status granted to his group by the IRS and is most likely enjoying not having to pay any state or local taxes for his organizations many enterprises! Thus clearly, he should be much more reserved in his statements. He is very much the shepherd of his flock with all the associated power over it as prescribed and bestowed upon him by his superior- the pope-and is always recognized as such whenever he speaks out on a political issue like immigration.
His Eminence should take care of the spiritual needs of his flock and stay out of politics. I know that is very hard to do given the long and mostly destructive history of the catholic church and her meddling into political affairs of the states throughout. This especially when it is to her financial benefit as well as to increase the Vatican’s power in the US.
I wish he would have shown the same compassion to the many victims of the church as he is showing for this law breakers.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Elitch Gardens

Nancy Hahn of Arvada writes:

On May 29, seven busloads of middle schoolers from Everitt Middle School met strict criteria to attend a reward trip to Elitch Gardens.
Students from Jefferson Academy and many, many other schools were there, too. It was a little cool, but promised to be a fun day. Then the rain came. It poured. Then hail came, and came, and came. Everyone gathered in buildings to wait it out. Severe weather is certainly not the park’s fault. The next thing that happened was their fault. Elitch’s announced that the park was closing. Everyone was to immediately leave the park.
Our school would not have transportation for our hundreds of students until 4 p.m. It was not even 2 p.m. The walkways were full of icy water and inches of hail, in places more than 10 inches deep. Children were forced out of buildings to walk through that ice and slush. Students in wheelchairs had to be shoved through it because they couldn’t force the chairs through themselves. Feet hurt so much from the ice cold water.
One young girl was crying because she found a place out of the slush and just didn’t know how to make herself step back into it. At the entrance no one was allowed to stay in the entrance area, but were forced to move outside. It began to hail again. This treatment by the park toward its customers was dangerous, disrespectful, and unnecessary. The park could have found a way for all those school groups to remain under cover in safety while arrangements were made for transport. It is a credit to the teachers and students themselves that they handled the situation so well.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Children’s Health Insurance Program

Francoise Mbabazi, director of the Colorado Progressive Coalition’s Health Justice Program, and Leah Bry, the program’s lead organizer, write:

This year Congress can invest in public health by reauthorizing the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). As Dr. Jeremy Lazarus wrote (Rocky Mountain News, May 16), this will allow the U.S. to maintain current coverage levels, support expansion plans, and reach eight million children who are eligible but not enrolled in SCHIP or Medicaid. But many children who need care still aren’t eligible for SCHIP.
Current federal regulations prohibit states from using federal funds for Medicaid or SCHIP on legal immigrants during their first five years as permanent residents. The proposed “Immigrant Children’s Health Improvement Act” (ICHIA) would allow states to cover these children and pregnant women under both programs.
It’s bad for public health, fiscally unwise and fundamentally unfair to deny health coverage to immigrant children and pregnant women. These children are the future of this country and their families contribute to our communities and economy. Nobody stands to benefit when children and pregnant mothers can’t access the health care they need.
As our U.S. Senators, Wayne Allard and Ken Salazar pursue their vital task of covering all of Colorado’s uninsured and underinsured children, it is important that they and Governor Ritter, who has not yet signed on in support of the measure, support ICHIA as part of the children’s health plan reauthorization. It’s time to restore health care equity to immigrant children and pregnant women.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Archbishop Chaput & immigration

Matthew Hayes of Aurora writes:

As a practicing Catholic, I am troubled by Denver Archbishop Charles Chaput’s statements in a May 27th letter to the faithful included in Sunday bulletins. While stating the immigration issue is complex and good people can disagree; he continues to say the current immigration bill is not amnesty. Chaput does not qualify this statement as his opinion. Chaput asks Catholics to reflect prayerfully and then support Sen. Ken Salazar.
I have reflected prayerfully. I pray the leaders of the United States work to strengthen our border security and work diligently and efficiently to deport as many illegal immigrants as possible. I, as do many Catholics, feel more immigration raids are necessary to act as a deterrent to the corporations hiring illegal immigrants for labor. The current laws need to be enforced uniformly throughout the United States before any meaningful immigration dialogue can take place.
Burglars are worthy of our Christian forgiveness and even sympathy, but we do not allow them to keep the objects they steal after they are arrested. I feel compassion for illegal immigrants, but I will not be shamed into thinking I am a bad Catholic for respecting the laws of our country and wanting enforcement.
There are thousands of Mexicans following the law and applying for entrance to the United States in accordance with our laws. Does Chaput feel the humanitarian issue of slapping them in the face for respecting order while their neighbors break our laws?
I would think the sex abuse scandals across the United States would have taught the Catholic Church to tread lightly in lecturing the faithful on criminal law enforcement issues. I would like to see the Church robustly support the enforcement of all criminal statutes to protect our citizens from abuse, criminal invasion or violence.
My guess is Chaput knows just how much fuller the collection basket would be each Sunday if the Catholic Church receives an influx of new members from Mexico.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (14) | TrackBack

Immigration bill

J.M. Schell of Arvada writes:

The last time I took a math class was in the 8th grade. Yet, whenever I hear or read about the numbers for the “Amnesty-That-Isn’t-Amnesty” bill being rushed through Congress for a rubber-stamping by Bush, I’m left wondering whether those pushing this made it even that far.
Even if you accept as accurate the laughably low number of 12 million “undocumented workers,” the Amnesty-That-Isn’t bill’s provisions permit millions more to enter the country on the shirttails of this original group. It works like this: You have the original 12 million. Add a spouse to each of these. Add to this couple their children (minor or adult? It’s not specified. Step-kids, too?). Being equitably PC, we’ll say each couple has only three kids. Now, add to that number the parents (why?) of both the original “undocumented worker” and his/her spouse. By the way, the bill is conveniently silent on the matter of the minor children of these parents, allowing us to assume these will be 60-something retirees looking only for a good game of canasta down to the community center.
Now, let’s do the math (in millions): 12 + 12 + 36 + 48 =108. Th’s 108 —million—. If my 8th grade math serves, this effectively increases the population of this nation by one-third. In five years. And let’s not forget that despite what the man behind the curtain in the Oval Office and his winged monkeys on both sides of the aisle in Congress are telling us, the actual base number of “undocumented workers” is certainly more than 20 million, and perhaps as high as 30 million.
Whether it’s with the cooked number they’re offering, or the real, much higher number, nobody advocating for Amnesty-that-Isn’t—whether in the media, politics (save Tom Tancredo) or in public and private activism—seems able to do the math.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Oil

Cindy Lowry of Arvada writes:

President Bush has always wanted to infringe on the American public with a FLAT TAX during tax time, instead he is in cahoots with the oil companies that are constantly goughing the American public pocket books. Naturally it stands to reason that he is not looking into investigating the oil companies because he is ONE OF THEM NOT US.
Everytime I listen a Network News broadcast about the spiraling cost of gas, the oil companies always say the same thing — we don’t have enough oil refineries, the American public isn’t cutting back on its oil consumption — there is a greater need for demand than supply — we are not goughing you —I just don’t believe there rhetic and pomp!! Until the American public decides to curtail is addiction to oil — NOTHING WILL CHANGE —- AND CONGRESS CAN MAKE NEWS LAWS TO MAKE THE OIL COMPANIES COMPLY — WE HAVE A LONG WAIT TO GO TO CHANGE OUR CONSCIOUSNESS.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

June 09, 2007
U.S. & Mexico

Mark A. Golden of Aurora writes:

How NAIVE will the U.S. Government Officials become before they awaken to the facts that the Mexican people do not like Americans. We supply jobs, homes, cars, medical care and a world of other benefits to the Mexican Nationals who live illegally inside the United States. Our currency is being sent to Mexico in a flood of Money Grams and Money Orders. Our Government Officials cover their eyes while giving free government loans and jobs to the people of Mexico. In return the people in Mexico boo our National Anthem, boo our athletes and boo our social representatives and even boo our President. Let’s cut off aid to Mexico, ship all the illegally entered Mexicans back to Mexico and shore up our Southern Border, then see what happens in Mexico. Stop all aid and help to Mexico, give our over abundance to our own people before we give it to any other country, then see how prosperous Mexico and the Mexican people will be. Why give all that we have to a people who hate the American s. Yes, they will take anything we want to supply to them for free, or near free and in return they will give us an abundance or reticule. “See the stupid Americans give away their own Country to people who are ungrateful.” Stop this stupid and harmful give away program of our Country. Stop this stupid political blunder of trying to help a country whose people, by their own actions, do not want our help. Stop letting the dog bite the hand that feeds it. Bandage the wounds from Mexico’s blatant hatred of America and turn our attentions to the social problems within our own borders. Once we have begun treating our own better, then and only then, should we try to help those who do not want nor condone our help. Get the United States out of Mexico and get Mexico out of the United States. Leave the two divided as the World Map shows, a distinctive line drawn between the two countries.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (60) | TrackBack

Ward Churchill

Jim Schwartz of Centennial writes:

Churchill’s inflammatory remarks aside, should the University of Colorado not fire Churchill for his strident and repeated plagiarism, it will prove that CU’s faculty is more concerned with its own tenure than academic integrity and honor. Anything less than firing of Churchill should cause CU’s moniker to be renamed from The Colorado Buffaloes to The Colorado Cheaters. Ralphie can be replaced by Bill Clinton in a zoot suit as the mascot.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (22) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Irwin MacLeod of Colorado Springs writes:

President Bush leaned across the podium in a State of the Union address and said that we had to look out for the mushroom cloud, and Condalessa Rice and Vice-President Chaney  went on the Sunday talk shows and made the same statements.  It did not matter that  Saddam Hussein had no delivery systems, no inter-continental ballistic missiles. He gave all his bombers to Iran during the 1991 war.  So without a delivery system of any kind that could reach the United States, Saddam Hussein presented no danger, but with this lie and a couple of others President Bush rushed us into war.  In another speech to the Nation he claimed that Iraq was trying to buy yellow cake from Niger The CIA said that claim was not true -  another lie.  President Bush and his administration claimed that Saddam Hussein and Ben Lauden were in collusion with each other.  George Tenet said this was not true - another lie.  There was no  eminent threat to the United States  It is hard to believe that the newspapers, and TV reporting, did not elaborate on the fact that  Saddam had no delivery system.  If they had, we may not have gone to war because he had convinced the American and the Congress that Saddam was a real threat to us.  With the horrible carnage that is Iraq with the thirty-five hundred fine  military men and women and tens and thousands of iraqis dead, it makes one’s heart bleed that we rushed into this war.  The President and the Vice-President started this war with lies and with con and subterfuge, and they should stand accountable for this.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Drunken patient

Dr. Todd Clever of Denver writes:

In a May 25 article by CBS 4 reporter Brian Maass, “Patient complains about doctor’s comments,” Karin Howe claims she was brought by an ambulance to Denver Health Medical Center after a fall from a rickshaw at 2:30 in the morning and not evaluated until 7:50 a.m.
Which scenario seems more likely: Howe was brought in by an ambulance to a level-one trauma center with a head wound, placed in a room, and not evaluated for more than five hours, or Howe’s blood-alcohol level of 0.216 (more than twice the legal limit for intoxication) precludes her remembering the evaluation and her actions that night?

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Diana DeGette & stem cell research

Walter Smetana of Highlands Ranch writes:

Re: “Abstinence programs useless,” 5/26/07

U.S. Rep. Diana DeGette, in her 6th term in Congress representing Colorado’s 1st Congressional District, is a liar. I write in response not to her article’s theme, but only in regard to its 2nd and 3rd sentences. That President Bush “disregard[S] peer-reviewed data, experts and science on...stem-cell research...he simply sticks his head in the sand.” In regard to stem-cell research, President Bush has vetoed federal funding for only EMBRYONIC stem-cell research. Nor has he done so out of disregard for data or science. He’s done it because science shouldn’t justify destroying innocent, defenseless, unwanted human life without that life’s volition, for the sake of others’ careers, health, or convenience.
No doubt biologically or medically experimenting on any human life to the detriment or destruction of that human life, can provide (just like it provided Dr. Josef Mengele), lots of scientific help, knowledge, learning, advancement, and benefit, and help for all those not so destroyed or experimented on. No doubt. Experimenting on Diana DeGette, or Michael J. Fox, or whoever’s unfortunate enough to be selected, to their harm, and providing benefit for the rest of humankind, doesn’t justify said experimentation. Nor make opposition to it “unscientific.”

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Illegal immigrants

Michael Brown of Morrison writes:

I had an opportunity to observe firsthand, not only government corruption, but police apathy as well. The walls and graffiti vibrate with “Denver is a Sanctuary City catering to illegals.” So does the Colorado State patrol.
Close to my home is a liquor store frequented by illegals working in the area. I observed a truck load of at least five stop at this liquor store, the driver make a purchase of a 12-pack, hand out the beer to the passengers and open one himself. They drove west on Quincy.
I attempted to call the Colorado State Patrol three times, *CSP once and twice on the land line, but only got the run-around and was passed off to someone else. This would have been a true daily double if they just got moving – five illegals drinking beer while driving. The government is hopelessly incompetent and looks the other way concerning illegals activities. If an American were to perform the same stunt, the CSP would have responded with a dozen patrol cars on the spot.
I am now convinced that the CSP is only interested in shaking down American motorists through numerous speed traps. Locking up drunken Mexicans is not a revenue stream, particularly when governments require more and more revenue to pay for less and less labor not performed.
The Rocky Mexican News and its staff writers can be so proud of illegals getting away with another one. Maybe a few photos could accompany a pity-me story on why Mexicans have it so hard, take American jobs, and drinking and driving is not a violation.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Teenagers

Kaitlin Nelson of Pueblo writes:

Ahh, the teenager. An old friend of mine woke up on day and realized, “Oh, I’m thirteen. I have to be bad now.” When the American Adult thinks of your average teenager, the image that comes to mind bears an uncanny resemblance to a pet hamster. In the day, it will refuse to emerge from its bed and will try to inflict serious bodily injury to you if you wake it up. It will then proceed to eat, defecate, and sit moodily in the cage you’ve forced on it. At night though, you cannot keep it quiet. Put it with other hamsters and you wind up with a fight or baby hamsters. It has a strange attraction to your computer wires, and it has bitten you more than once.
Obviously, we would all love a chance to change the irresponsible teen and their poor attitude, right? However, a serious part of resolving this problem lies in understanding why teenagers act as they do. Many reasons exist, as teenage behavior has been attributed to everything from hormones to poor potty training, but one part of the why behind the whine may come as a surprise.
I ought to admit right now that I am a teenager myself. While this does give me a bit of a bias, I can tell you from personal experience that adopting the hamster view is extremely discouraging to us as well. I have been involved in ballet, music, competitive speaking, and drama and have met exceptional teenagers who have discarded the stereotype and have achieved incredible things. The sad parts of these teen’s stories are the many shocked adults that wonder how someone that age could possibly have risen to those levels.
Herein lies the problem: One of the main reasons teens lean towards the stereotype is simply because the stereotype exists. Young people between ages thirteen and nineteen must reach a point in their lives where they step out of childhood and into adulthood. Believe it or not, teens do have a desire to be acceptable to adults. They want to fit into the generation they will interact with for the rest of their lives. But too often teens find themselves conveniently tucked away into the stereotype when others expect too little of them because of their age. America must give them points for something; they do meet the expectations of the culture. Teens want to achieve what is expected of them, but when people expect little, they get little.
They the first to turning teens away from this downward spiral is to expect more of them. This should not be done in the sense that they will be punished at every fault, but that adults tell them they can surpass the typical and achieve the excellent. The second step is arguably more important; adults must help them overcome difficulties, teach them to shine, and encourage them for a job well done. The book of Titus from the Bible shows us how to “teach the older. then they can train the younger” (see Titus 2:1-5). Whenever the next generation understands that adults want them to succeed and are willing to help them, instead of simply giving up on them due to their age, we may very well see a change in the stereotype.
Culture must shift from the idea of “You can’t help the way you are; you’re hopeless” to the message of “Don’t let anyone look down on you because you are young, but set an example. in speech, in life, in love, in faith and in purity” (1 Timothy 4:12).

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

300-foot towers

Marc Halpern of Denver writes:

Residents living in the area of The Country Club Gardens are concerned about the construction of 300-foot towers along Downing Street between Ellsworth and Bayaud on the Denver Historic Landmark, Country Club Gardens. The proposed towers extend West from Downing to South Ogden Street creating a huge wall. At a meeting with the developer on May 31 local residents expressed their concerns about the height of the towers (unprecedented in the West Wash Park neighborhood). Among the issues raised were: the effect on street parking (already overflowing); the effect on traffic; and the effect of huge shadows darkening the neighborhood to the South, East, and West. Neighbors have set up a web site to inform people of the latest development as the proposal moves through Denver City Council. The web site is www.denver-neighbors.com. You can email them at info@denver-neighbors.com .

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Immigration reform

Richard D. Van Lew of Centennial writes:

On Tuesday, May 29th, you ran two opinion items dealing with immigration reform; the first, by Michelle Malkin, with a number of troubling occurences of Hispanics denigrating our nation, to wit: at various venues disrespecting our national anthem, hailing “Osama” and, a few days ago, verbally berating Miss USA at the pageant held in Mexico City. The list goes on and on, to the chagrin of the liberals who are wont to deny such happenings. Charles P. Chaput’s item on immigration reform bill S-1348, on the other hand is mostly sympathetic to the pending legislation, while conceding that the bill does “arguably need improvment” in some “areas.” Also, his reference to getting “past the tribalism...” puzzled this reader.
Is that the same as being “Nativist?” (Heaven forbid!) Incidentally, you identified Chaput (as did he) as “the Archbishop of Denver.” This is incorrect. He is the Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese headquartered in Denver. This is a common error in identifying the title of an Archibishop. I know you are desirous of accuracy in the “Rocky.”

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

Hispanic youth

J.M. Schell of Arvada writes:

Apparently, my kids chose their parents very, very poorly (RE: “‘Hispanic’ drop-outs,” RMN, 5/30).
Had they only picked parents who were not born in this country, and/or are here illegally, taking advantage of the “free” education system, why then everyone and his tio would be bending over backward helping them get through the Byzantine college application process and navigating the financial aid minefield. Unfortunately, my kids picked parents whose grandparents were born here, who speak English like, well, natives, and who have told them all their lives how important education is.
I guess taking it upon themselves to earn straight-As in the absence of any taxpayer funded “community involvement” programs, counseling, tutoring and events designed to propel them into college (along with their poor choice in parents) only goes to show that my kids ain’t the sharpest knives in the drawer!
Say, maybe they can get jobs mowing lawns or cleaning toilets for some of those “Hispanic” kids in the article?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Immigration bill

Jim Dillie of Denver writes:

President Bush says “lets give it a try. No, he is not referring to the surge in Iraq or the Iraq war (which doesn’t seem to be going well). He is referring to the Immigration Reform Bill in the Senate. A President with no credibility is asking the American people to sit quietly in the backround and let our government pass a law that will absolve 20 million criminals of their crimes so they can remain in the U.S. How stupid does he think we are? Well lets see. We, the people, did let him “give it a try” when he started the Iraq war and we didn’t do anything when he wanted to “give it a try” and initiate a surge (increase troop strength). Maybe we aren’t so smart after all.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Immigration bill

B. Stuckey of Denver writes:

When President Bush and Sen. Kennedy are on the same page, one has to wonder what the president is up to. The Senate immigration bill is a case in point. We hope that the Congress will see this bill for what it is, instant amnesty for millions of illegal aliens, and ensure its demise.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 02:00 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Key U.S.-Iranian history unmentioned

In a world of sound bites, it is always nice to have a newspaper give us some historical background, which the Rocky Mountain News did (courtesy ofThe Associated Press) in its May 29 editions, as a sidebar to the announcement that we had resumed official diplomatic relations with Iran for the first time in 29 years.
Unfortunately, in a region where centuries of memories fuel present-day conflicts, this “history” does not go back further than 29 years.
The most important historical fact about U.S.-Iranian relations was as unmentioned as has been our even more recent military support for the late Saddam Hussein.
And that is this: The CIA, along with the Brits and some Iranian allies, overthrew the democratically elected Mohammad Mossadegh in 1953 (Time magazine’s Man of the Year in 1951). The shah took over. Oil, of course, was the underlying issue.
Iranians know about this; we should, too. Incidentally, the word “blowback,” which encapsulates our current troubles with the radical Islamicists, was first used in a CIA document describing our unfortunate history with Iran.

Gregg Painter, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Brilliant photo

Kudos to Rocky Mountain News photographer Matt McClain for the May 31 front page picture of graduating cadets at the U.S. Air Force Academy celebrating by tossing their caps into the air as the Thunderbirds fly overhead. It brilliantly captured the moment. Pulitzer?

R.J. Ceremsak, Evergreen

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Things have changed; will the Rocky?

Since Comcast, in its “motivated by greed” marketing wisdom, has chosen to drop the TV Guide Channel (among others) from its basic analog cable package (“Comcast trims analog cable lineup,” Business, May 31), it would seem that the Rocky Mountain News might want to revisit its decision to not carry the TV schedules in its weekday papers.
For those of us who won’t be coerced into spending more money on cable TV than we presently do, it would be greatly appreciated if the good old reliable daily paper could provide that information.

Floyd Scharlemann, Lafayette

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Some Muslim cities not inherently ‘holy’

Washington is our “capital city,” objectively recognized as such by law and the fact that it is the seat of our government. New York City is, among other things, a “port city” because large ships moor in its harbor.
Rome, Salt Lake City and Jerusalem are celebrated by some for the religious events that occurred and shrines located in or near these places. News stories about and originating in these cities identify them only by their names.
Kufa, Iraq, is also just a city. It is “newsworthy” only because a notorious Muslim military leader spoke at a mosque there. Why does the Rocky Mountain News (May 26 caption) refer to it “the holy city”? That Kufa has a shrine does not distinguish it from numerous other cities and places the Rocky does not honor with the objective description “holy” — or indeed, any other honorific or descriptive title.
That some Shiites consider Kufa “holy” is an interesting cultural phenomenon. However, Kufa is not objectively “holy.” The Rocky’s characterization of Kufa (and Najaf, for that matter) as “holy” is not news, it is opinion — and it suggests a bias in the Rocky’s reporting about the Muslim world.

Stephen Kapnik, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Questionable choice

With the plethora of news available, I was extremely surprised and dismayed to find the Rocky Mountain News could only find another article and picture about the “poor” Hispanic students in Denver (“The longest odds”) who have difficulty staying in school for its May 30 front page.
Surely there was other more deserving news, i.e., about our loyal soldiers in Iraq, the latest news about President Bush and his woes and troubles, or the story about Roger Baxter (“Dodging death a 2nd time”) that would have been a better front-page choice and of more interest to more American citizens!

Lou Hylton, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

June 08, 2007
Spanish influence

Wayne Trujillo of Denver, editorial director of Latino SUAVE Magazine, writes:

Earl Dodge makes some astute and legitimate points in his letter (Anglo heritage can be claimed by all) regarding Anglo heritage. There’s no disputing that the customs and mores of Anglos who settled Jamestown and other colonial outposts of the British Empire resulted in the Declaration of Independence, Constitution and Bill of Rights. Their descendents scripted those ideals and fought the Revolutionary War to realize them. No question their heirs’ struggle for independence gave birth to our nation.
However, ignoring the Spanish influence in American history is wrong. Many of us have ancestors who arrived on American soil years before the Mayflower docked. Yes, those ancestors abused and killed Native Americans. They also married them, making many of us descendants of the only true non-immigrants. That ethnic hybrid bred traditions that still resonate across large swathes of the American Southwest, and increasingly across the nation.
Recent immigrants aren’t the sole reason for today’s widespread Hispanic influence. With a fealty to tradition, along with a proud and historical presence in American culture, Hispanic religious and social practices long ago crossed into the American mainstream, making an irrefutable claim to the slogan, “We are America.”
And it’s worthwhile to point out that, while the Spanish conquistadors were indeed often cruel, so were many Anglo pioneers who not only institutionalized slavery, but killed and uprooted tribes of Native Americans with their explorations and expansion.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:59 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Democrats & Iraq war

Todd Ponton (no hometown provided) writes:

Is it just me or is there something rotten in Washington?
The Democrats take over as the leading party, promising the American voters that a timetable will be given to our withdrawal from Iraq and to show how serious they are, they deny funding the war.
Now, they buckle, giving Bush all the time and money he wants.
Nobody, especially a large number of people, suddenly ‘changes’ their minds for no reason. Even one person doesn’t change their mind so drastically.
When it does happen, it’s rare, and with purpose.
The only thing I can think of is two things: One, Bush has somehow found a way to blackmail anyone and everyone standing in his way. Two, Bush has come into some convincing information that Iraq is about to buckle like the Democratic party.
I say it’s time for the donkey, instead of buckling, buck the elephant in the gonads.
We’ve done all we can in Iraq. The Iraqi people had a taste of Democracy by voting for their own government and new freedoms. If they want to keep it, THEY have to fight for it like America did during the Revolutionary war. I know the real problem is the insurgents. If the Iraqi people want to keep Democracy, friends and families must turn in loved ones who are insurgents, and we must promise them that they won’t be harmed, just imprisoned and reeducated. You can’t convince me that all these Iraqi people we’ve given Democracy to don’t know any insurgents. You can’t have your cake and eat it too. War is not supposed to be polite and compromising.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:58 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Rosie O’Donnell

Judy Coet of Northglenn writes:

I would like to weigh in on the Rosie O’Donnell-Elizabeth Hasselbeck encounter. ABC fired the wrong person — Hasselbeck should have been the one let go.
She was the one who was wagging her finger at O’Donnell. I for one will not ever watch The View again, I will watch Rachael Ray instead. The View lost me as a viewer when they let Rosie go.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:57 PM | Comments (41) | TrackBack

Iraqi Parliament

Robert Porath of Boulder writes:

There is much criticism today that the Iraqi Parliament is taking a two month summer vacation while there is ongoing civil unrest and American troops are being killed. With one of our “benchmarks for progress” being that they pass an act that cedes 70-80% of their oil to Western oil companies, can it be any wonder that a long vacation seems alluring? Far better than selling out their country and painting bright targets on their foreheads. This is, after all, the same legislative body that has voted to ask American forces leave the country.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:56 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Boulder High controversy

Dr. Louise Benson of Broomfield writes:

The strange occurrence of a conservative defending the indefensible at Boulder High School was explained in the second to last paragraph: “As a Boulder High parent....” Aha! School spirit, Go BHS! Kopel further explains that tolerance and freedom of speech is what makes BHS special. Surely he knows that tolerance for such things as corruption of juveniles is societal suicide, and that the First Amendment has special limitations in schools. It does make a difference what other citizens think, and what community standards and school conduct codes are. It’s not just the business of Boulder High parents, because the mental and physical health of youth affects all of us.
As a physician, I know that most teenager’s brains are not mature enough for complex, emotionally involved decisions such as drugs, sex and alcohol, so telling them to “do it responsibly,” and “know your limits” is dangerous nonsense that will get many teens in deep trouble. In addition, the younger children begin to use drugs and alcohol, the more likely they are to become addicted and have more difficulty quitting, much more so than adults. Even marijuana is psychologically addictive for some individuals, and it is harder on the lungs than tobacco.
Boulder got it’s back up in the face of criticism. Admit the mistake, correct the harm, and move on: it’s the adult thing to do.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:55 PM | Comments (23) | TrackBack

Diana DeGette & abstinence

Jay and Dianne Moyers of Centennial write:

Rep. Diana DeGette’s column on abstinence programs is full of irony and hypocrisy. She states that “The United States has the highest teen pregnancy rate in the Western world...” At the present time the U.S. spends $12 for Planned Parenthood programs for every $1 spent for abstinence. Our present plan is a failure. So her solution is to spend more on the same. Isn’t this the definition of insanity?
She cites research done Mathematica. The Family Research Council reports:
“The researchers chose to ignore the abstinence programs most recommended for study, and focused on programs that have since been revised. The scope and the depth of abstinence programs were ignored, and a narrow few chosen for examination.
One example of intensive programming (for abstinence education) is Best Friends in Washington, D.C. An independent study of this program was published in the peer-reviewed journal Adolescent and Family Health in 2005. The young women who participate in the program are called Diamond Girls, and they hail from some of the District’s toughest wards. Study author Robert Lerner Ph.D. found that the Diamond Girls are substantially less likely to smoke, drink, take illegal drugs, and have sex than a comparable sample of youth in the Centers for Disease Control’s surveys.
Lerner goes on to say that the finding that Diamond Girls are 120 times more likely to abstain from sex than their peers is a result so strong that it is unheard of in practically any empirical research. Programs like Best Friends are succeeding because they aim high and sell no one short.”
At least, Rep. DeGette should give full information in her analysis.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:54 PM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Wayne Wathen of Highlands Ranch

In honor of those brave troops that are dying and being sent to die everyday, I can think of one way that the war would likely end. Congress and the Senate could pass a bill and the Bush sign a bill that would require every lawmaker including Bush require a family member replace anyone who is scheduled to go to Iraq for a 2nd or 3rd tour of duty. Tancredo, Musgrave, Allard, and Bush certainly do not have any problems sending other to die or return with grave head wounds or lost limbs. But if they or their families also had to sacrifice, what a different tune we would hear and think of all of the excuses we would hear. Of course we have already heard some of them for example when Tancredo ducked out of going to Viet Nam because of mental problems. Not sure that has been taken care of yet.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:54 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Immigration bill

Howard Spery of Evergreen writes:

The Secure Borders, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Reform Act of 2007 is titled incorrectly. The only correct term in the title is the year 2007.
The bill is seriously flawed on multiple grounds. A few are listed below:
*It cuts the amount of fence approved last year in half;
*The increase in Border Patrol is phased in over multiple years;
*The massive number of individuals who will be legitimized will create a huge drain on our economy;
*With “baby boomers” stretching Social Security and Medicare to the breaking point, the huge cost of the legalized immigrants will fracture these programs;
*The enforcement triggers supposedly in the bill are nonexistent - provisional Z-visas will be issued from day 1;
*The economic opportunity created by the bill is primarily to the benefit of agri-business and other large employers who will continue to have access to low cost labor to the detriment of all blue collar labor;
*The Title VI Z-Visa grants amnesty to virtually all of the 12 to 20 million illegals currently in the country without cap and almost no proof of eligibility,
*The “temporary” Z-visa can be renewed every 4 years until the person dies,
*The Z-visa does not differentiate between a Mexican national who has worked here for several years and a Muslim from a country with active Jihadist groups,
*Whatever government agency which is going to be charged with the back ground checks for the Z-visa applicants has been given no funds or additional people and 24 hours to perform each check - after that time the applicant is granted a provisional visa with all benefits,
*Fugitives from deportation orders from immigration judges (over 636,000) are eligible for visas,
*Gang members would be eligible if they sign a “renunciation of gang affiliation".
The text of the bill is available on the Heritage Foundation web-site as well as an analysis of provisions and costs. If you find it difficult to believe my points listed above (and there are many more), I urge you to review the bill for yourself.
Our Senators from Colorado appear to support this flawed bill and only a flood of calls and contacts from their constituents are going to do anything to slow their support. One senator seems to have an excess of ethnic solidarity and pride of authorship and the other is following a President who would sign a little yellow rubber ducky if someone would call it “comprehensive immigration reform".

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:53 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Privacy

Dennis Hammond of Lakewood writes:

In the May 16 Mini Page there was a write-up about the Ninth and Tenth amendments to the U.S. Constitution. In it, writer Betty Debnam stated that the right to privacy is not listed in the Bill of Rights or in the Constitution.
Has Debnam ever read the Fourth Amendment? “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Privacy was most definitely on the minds of our Founders; in fact, they placed it fourth in importance in the Bill of Rights.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:52 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

The Rocky

Jean Allen of Littleton writes:

Paul Bunyan’s bookkeeper, Johnny lnkslinger, saved one and a half barrels of ink one winter by not dotting the “i’s” or crossing the “t’s”.
How much ink did the Rocky save last month by decreasing the font size and fading the text? What’s next? No dots on “i’s” or crosses on “t’s”?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:51 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Iraq war spending

Tommy Holeman of Longmont writes:

While we assess what’s happening in the netherworld of Washington D.C, we the people are becoming more and more disenchanted with our so-called leaders.
We elected to change the dynamics of a one-party-in-control-of-all-three-branches scenario, but we apparently got shafted anyhow with new leadership-without-the-courage-of-OUR-convictions scenario.
If we don’t learn from the mistakes of the former USSR, we will soon follow them into oblivion.
The “war” in Afghanistan was the costly last straw for the USSR and Osama-Bin-Laden is playing the same game with us. And,unfortunately, it seems, he’s succeeding.
With the latest 100 billion approved for our little “war", that brings the total to over 600 billion, and that’s over and above the war departments’ budget that they claim is 23 %. (The number is considerably higher when you figure in how many other departments contribute to keeping the military afloat, eg; food stamps for underpaid troops families, housing costs ,fuel costs,maintenance scams and pork projects, to name a few) The actual costs have been estimated at closer to 50 % of our budget.
We can’t afford to keep the Military Industrial Complex in business.( Ike warned us of exactly this 50 years ago.) Unless , of course,you want to be like our ol’ buddies, the Commies, as well as make Osama a very happy man.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:44 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Creationism

Donald Gilbreath of Castle Rock writes:

Thank you for reporting on the Creation Museum. Many people believe an infinite God created time and space about 6,000 years ago and revealed our origins in human language. Others believe in eternal matter/energy that produced life through random processes. Others believe something in-between. Whatever you believe, you should hear the arguments of creationist organizations such as Answers in Genesis.
People think that if you don’t believe in millions of years, you are unscientific, deceptive, and/or delusional. This is understandable because cartoons, movies, schools, natural history museums, and zoos all express millions of years as undisputed fact.
In reality, creationists embrace science. Many top engineers and scientists believe in a young earth, including MRI pioneer Dr. Raymond Damadian. The scientific method itself stems from belief in an orderly God who established natural laws we could discover through repeatable tests. Therefore, most of our current scientific disciplines were founded by creationists.
Evolutionary thinking has actually held back scientific discovery. Organs with unknown functionality were considered “vestigial” and went decades without being properly researched. Then there was “junk” DNA, which we now know has key functions. Please keep an open mind and find out more than a caricature of what creationists believe.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 11:19 AM | Comments (32) | TrackBack

A DIFFERING VIEW: Immigration opponents killed driver’s license bill


There’s been so much confusion around House Bill 1313, which I sponsored, that I think it’s having an identity crisis! (“Driver’s license sanity,” Rocky editorial, June 5.)

As widely reported, Colorado citizens were unable to get driver’s licenses or photo ID cards because the Division of Motor Vehicles had adopted overly stringent rules. The bill would have clarified the documents legal residents must present to get a state ID.

Applicants could use government-issued documents, such as U.S. passports, some out-of-state licenses, birth certificates and military IDs as proof of legal status. All documents provided must be secure and verifiable in accordance with current law. Staff at the DMV were free to take more time to verify documents that are not in wide use.

Opponents, led largely by right-wing radio talk-show hosts, trumped up concerns that the bill would allow illegal immigrants to get identification. Through misrepresentation and politically motivated rhetoric, the legislation was mischaracterized as an immigration issue.

Illegal immigration is a legitimate concern, one that I share. That’s why a year ago, the legislature passed the toughest package of immigration laws in the country.

Unfortunately, anti-immigration activists who misrepresented HB 1313 managed to get their voices heard. Subsequently, the governor vetoed the bill.

Now citizens must rely on the DMV to ensure that legal residents who are entitled to receive a state ID will be able to do so. I hope the DMV will provide appropriate and responsive customer service to the citizens of Colorado.

Rosemary Marshall, a Democrat from Denver, represents House District 8 in the Colorado General Assembly.

Posted by denver-admin at 09:09 AM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

The politically correct will destroy this nation

In response to Michal Kucera’s letter of May 31, “It’s our actions that have fueled terrorism,” someone please help me with this one.
Among Kucera’s “head-in-the-sand” drivel, he states, “ ... it was our invasion of Iraq that created or brought the terrorists there. Had we not invaded, we would not be fighting Iraqi terrorists in Baghdad or Main Street U.S.A.”
Really, Mr. Kucera? Let me ask you which terrorists held American hostages for 444 days in 1979? Who blew up the Pan Am flight over Scotland in the ’80s? Which terrorists blew up the Marine barracks or the various embassies? Which terrorists blew a hole in the side of the USS Cole? Which terrorists blew out the World Trade Center parking garage in 1993?
Ignorance of the Bush administration? How about the ignorance of granola-munching pacifists like Kucera whose political correctness is what will destroy this country.

Stephen McBrayer, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (77) | TrackBack

Churchill profound, knowledgeable

Ward Churchill is a far more profound, original, knowledgeable, productive and important scholar than any of his critics.
Comparing his scholarly credentials to those of the man who has recommended his dismissal is perfectly ludicrous. The case against Churchill is without intellectual substance and without ethical merit.
The firing of Churchill would be an immense blow to academic freedom and to the educational quality that academic freedom protects. It would also be an immense loss to the intellectual community at the University of Colorado. I will continue to do everything within my power to prevent this from happening.

Tom Mayer, Boulder
Professor, Department of Sociology
University of Colorado at Boulder

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (65) | TrackBack

Driver’s license Catch-22

To renew a Colorado driver’s license you need documents, one of which can be a United States passport. To get a United States passport you need a birth certificate. If you were born in Pennsylvania, to get a birth certificate you must supply them with a copy of your Colorado driver’s license.
Round and round she goes and where she stops nobody knows.

Allison F. Page, Highlands Ranch

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

June 07, 2007
Amendment 41

Anthony J. Fabian of Aurora writes:

Kudos to Denver District Judge Christina Habas for having the courage to declare Amendment 41 unconstitutional-her opinion is a brilliant legal evaluation of his law. Although no one supports influence-peddling or corruption in government, proponents of this ill-conceived and poorly-devised law misled the electorate regarding its effect on freedom of political speech. I hope this will be a lesson to future referendum proponents to take greater care in the preparation and public representation of such ballot measures, and that the electorate will likewise learn to read the content of a proposed law rather than just voting for a catchy slogan.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:02 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Thomas Johnson of Aurora writes:

Recently, President Bush appointed a war czar. However, the Constitution makes the president the commander in chief. It looks as if Bush has actually outsourced his own job.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:01 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Thomas Johnson of Aurora writes:

Recently, President Bush appointed a war czar. However, the Constitution makes the president the commander in chief. It looks as if Bush has actually outsourced his own job.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:01 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Ward Churchill

Benjamin Whitmer of Denver, lecturer in ethnic studies at the University of Colorado at Boulder, writes:

It’s nice to see that Hank Brown has dropped the pretense of due process as regards Ward Churchill, recommending termination in the face of the one year suspension recommended by CU’s Privilege and Tenure Committee. I have no doubt that the Regents will hammer the last nail in this charade’s coffin.
The recommendation of the P&T Committee was the end result of due process.
It was Ward Churchill’s final appeal, necessitated by the laughable ignorance of American Indian studies demonstrated by the Standing Committee on Research Misconduct, which recommended termination. It was an ignorance which presumably accounts for the marked disparity in penalties recommended by the two committees, and is verified by the charges of academic misconduct being filed against the Standing Committee by numerous scholars who are actually conversant in the field.
That Hank Brown can ignore this final result of due process should send icewater chills down every CU faculty member’s spine. And given that it’s been their refusal to stand up for even their own rights that’s allowed it, I hope they understand the ramifications.
I hope they understand that any expression deviating from mainstream opinion — as dictated by Clear Channel, of course — will result in their being purged. I hope they understand that they’ve been complicit in the destruction of every protection afforded them in the name of academic freedom, not to mention their constitutional rights. I hope they understand that the only career path left for them at CU is to keep their mouths shut and their heads under their desks.
Not that doing so should be a problem.
That’s what they do best.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 04:00 PM | Comments (16) | TrackBack

Eco-terrorists

John Green of Petaluma, Calif., writes:

In its editorial of May 29, “Yes, they’re terrorists,” the Rocky Mountain News did an adequate job in explaining the legal justification under which the judge in the Operation Backfire cases is sentencing environmental saboteurs as terrorists. Unfortunately, the Rocky was equally proficient in dodging the real issue: Is there a real, moral justification for calling these people terrorists?
Simply citing the law and then rationalizing its argument with shoddy reasoning is something of a dereliction of the Rocky’s editorial responsibilities. The statement, “No one was hurt or killed, but it could easily have happened,” plainly ignores the facts of the case. The Backfire defendants clearly went out of their way to avoid injuring anyone (or anything), which places their actions in stark opposition to those of Timothy McVeigh, Osama bin Laden, etc., whose express purpose was to terrorize by killing as many people as possible.
If SUV drivers are frightened (and I seriously doubt that any are), it is primarily because of the hysteria whipped up over property crimes by our government, and the late Republican majority in particular, which clearly values property more than life. The comparison of property destruction to mass slaughter cheapens the term terrorism, and denigrates the experiences of those in New York, Washington and elsewhere, who went through actual terror.
In addition, under the broad definitions of these new so-called “anti-terror” laws, the Boston Tea Party, union organizing in the 20s and 30s and much of the civil rights movement could be prosecuted as terrorism.
How long will it be before nonviolent protesters are arrested for “any offense that is calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government? And what will be the Rocky Mountain News’ weak justification for agreeing with the government that those acts are terrorism?

Posted by denver-admin at 03:59 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Illegal immigrants

Barb Adams of Parker writes:

I don’t understand this constant obsessing of some with making sure that illegal aliens are taken care of and have jobs, benefits, etc.
The news likes to report that the jobs are “unwanted” by Americans, but I highly doubt this is true. I am aware of several Denver area companies that purposefully advertise only on Hispanic radio and newspapers for open positions. This pretty much ensures they can pay less for those jobs and doesn’t give the opportunities to our own legal citizens first!
What about all of our own people — legal U.S. citizens living in poverty in the U.S.? Are our own legal citizens not as important as those who snuck into our nation illegally? Charity begins at home!
What strange priorities people seem to have these days!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:59 PM | Comments (35) | TrackBack

Prison gangs

Steve Schweitzberger of Littleton writes:

RE: Ceremonial saunas in the hole. (page 41 May 31, 2007

I thought jail was the “can". Anyway.
I wonder if your AP guest reporter, Susan Montoya Bryan, could shed light on the practice (which I have come to believe is very widespread) of jail administrators, at all levels of jurisdiction, allowing gangs to thrive inside prison walls.
My concern is the “favors owed” factor amid gang retention of ex-cons. A gang leader in prison lent his Sport Utility Vehicle to other gang members on the outside, and that vehicle was used in a drive-by killing. Connections to gang-related financial opportunities and guns is certain.
Of course I am remembering Denver Bronco Darrent Williams. I sense very little political will to deal with gang loyalties in prisons because, I am told, the prison administrators use internal gangs to help control the wards. This gang-culture mentality is not much different than how well-armed militias controlled Iraq for Saddam Hussein. Look at the big picture of that.
The problem with prisons letting gangs function, and strengthen, is that the associations bring gang ethics back into our communities (about 100,000 prisoners are released in Colorado every year). Even if they didn’t have gang allegiances when they entered prisons, most convicts have formed allegiances by the time they are released back into civilization.
Gang affiliation has become a survival instinct for prisoners. I presume a lot of the gang mayhem in our communities is a direct result of our not caring about gangs within the institutions of incarceration. And yet we see the long list of gang victims and ask why?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:58 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Ward Churchill

Larry De Cicco of Evergreen writes:

The faculty lounge in the Liberal Arts Department must be a source of some interesting thinking. “The cops have no right to arrest a person for possession of drugs discovered after they are caught for speeding"; “The Great Impostor should not have been arrested for flying a plane without licensing or counterfeiting checks, because he did a good job"; “Ward Churchill should be vigorously defended because his academic fraud wouldn’t have been discovered but for his inflammatory speech".
Now some new whack job professor, Tom Mayer, has emerged from the Looney Ward lounge, to support Ward, because Ward is “an important scholar". Ward was an important scholar like Nacchio was an important overseer of Qwest workers’ stock holdings. Do these people not understand that Ward is threatening any credibility their department may have? The interesting thing is that you hear very little from Ward’s Columbus Day co-thug, Glenn Morris. Thuggery and intimidation has been the hallmark of the formation of their rag tag racism. I am surprised that these new thinkers don’t bring out the race card as the reason the unwashed masses have prejudice against Ward, the un-Indian.
Why would CU consider the defensive rantings of these whack-job academic terrorists? Does ethnic intimidation, fraud in resume representation, thuggery and intimidation in the classroom, minority mis-representation for hiring quota fulfillment, and overall academic fraud matter to CU, outside of the lunatic fringe of Ward defenders? Will David Lane continue to represent Ward while it is becoming more and more apparent that their positioning is just nitpicking, instead of an actual defense?
In a country where more people vote for American Idol than cast ballots in an election, anything can happen. My hope is that sanity will prevail, and this tempest in a teapot will slip beneath the waves, as Ward retires to the un-Native American reservation somewhere.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:57 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Immigration bill

Mark Hansen of Bayfield writes:

This immigration bill, (S.2611) that both Bush and Salazar support, would “legalize” the 12 to 20 million estimated people already here illegally. This bill gives those who come forward, (out of the shadows) a “Z” visa and allows them to stay here indefinitely. This bill also grants family members of those already here, the right to come to America and obtain their own class of “Z” visa. Every spouse, child or parent would be allowed to come to America and join the original alien “Z” visa holder. Potentially, that could mean 48 million to 80 million new people in the country within a very short time. Colorado is very likely to get at least 500,000 of the new people, up to as many as 2 million more residents. This bill would quintuple the current rate of legal immigration.
Thats roughly 200,000 to a 800,000 new homes in Colorado, to house these new residents. Thats great for real estate agents and construction companies, but not for those of us that love Colorado’s open space and clean natural environment. This many new people will require MORE schools, more roads, more doctors, more hospitals, more cars, more stores, more oil refineries...in short more everything! Except, that means less for everybody already here, less open space, less forest, less quality of life, less access to doctors or medical care, less clean air.
This is an “amnesty” bill, no matter what President Bush or Senator Salazar says it is. The other shame on this bill, is that these new “legal” residents will be entitled to Social Security payments, and Medicare almost immediately (after becoming “legal”) under current court decisions. These programs are so underfunded now that they stand little chance of being viable in 20 years. Adding millions of new people to the benefit roles will only speed that collapse.
We need to oppose this bad bill for very many reasons. This bill will change our way of life forever! Lets at least slow down, and not rush this through the Senate without examining every detail and every possible consequence before it changes all our lives forever.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:57 PM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Diana DeGette & abstinence

Robert E. Forman of Lakewood writes:

According to her “opinion” in the Saturday, May 26, 2007 edition of the combined Rocky Mountain News / The Denver Post, Rep. Diane DeGette thinks that abstinence programs are useless. Perhaps, however, it is her ideas and opinions that are utterly useless.
Jesus Christ to an adulterous woman: Go, and sin no more.
Rep. Diane DeGette to school children: Here’s a condom; here’s how to use it; go, and sin.
Jesus Christ focused simply on the problem: Sin.
Jesus Christ focused very simply on the solution: STOP SINNING.
But people like Rep. DeGette must think that “sin” is not the problem; they must think that God/Jesus Christ is the problem. So their solution is more condoms, more contraceptives, more treatments, more cures; more money spent on condoms, contraceptives, treatments and cures; more abortions and more sinning.
There are earthly consequences to committing a crime/sin and there are eternal consequences to committing a crime/sin — just as there are eternal consequences to being an enabler who condones, encourages, and teaches others to sin.
There’s Christ’s way and there’s DeGette’s way. And plain and simply, the two are opposed to one another.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 03:56 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

A DIFFERING VIEW: ‘Clean Cars’ law would protect health, environment

One way to protect our citizens’ health, our economy, our environment and our future is to cut pollution. But the Rocky thinks “Clean Cars” legislation, already adopted by 12 states to slash greenhouse gas emissions, is the wrong way to go (“California dreaming,” June 4).

A year ago, the Rocky reported that Colorado was in jeopardy of violating federal clean air standards. The head of air programs for the EPA in Denver was quoted as saying “the consequences of lapsing into (dirty air) status would be rather devastating.” I agree.

Transportation projects would be delayed and economic development would be stymied.
The problem is we’re still on the verge of violating these standards. I think we should do something about it.

Unfortunately, the federal government has been slow or unwilling to act on climate change. The Clean Air Act explicitly grants states the authority to pass air quality regulations so long as they meet minimum federal standards.

In 2002, California passed legislation requiring cars and light-duty trucks to limit emissions that contribute to climate change. Since then, 11 other states have adopted the California tailpipe emissions standards. Together, these states account for more than one-third of the U.S. auto market.

While Colorado has yet to pass a similar “Clean Cars” program, we want to protect our right to set strong air quality standards if we choose.

We need to find solutions. The Rocky should not be so quick to dismiss such feasible, cost-effective ideas as “Clean Cars” legislation. Too much is at stake.

Andrew Romanoff is speaker of the House in the Colorado General Assembly.

Posted by denver-admin at 09:11 AM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Immigration bill costly, inept

The question you may one day be asked is this: Were you there when they tore apart our country?
The Bush-Kennedy-Salazar approach is to create a complicated bill with vast government regulations that will, of course, ineptly deal with the nuances and nonsense of their own new amnesty bill. None apparently believe that the rule of law means too much anymore.
This bill masquerading as “immigration reform” will do more to change your life than any other legislation. Heritage Foundation studies (Kennedy-Bush-Salazar don’t have any) suggest that the amnesty bill will cost the American taxpayer about $2 trillion in the coming years and would allow another perhaps 100 million people to enter the country. Can you imagine the economic, the cultural and the environmental impact of this approach? Your senators and the president are thoughtless and probably corrupt.
Sen. Ken Salazar, much like last summer, has become Kennedy’s lapdog on this issue. He virtually sees no evil when it comes to Mexicans illegally among us. Perhaps we can all remember this for the 2010 election.

Gary Neiens, Pueblo

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (62) | TrackBack

Conflicted conservative

Jim Dillie (“Penalize those who hire illegals — big time,” May 25) says employers should be severely punished for hiring illegal aliens. Assuming Dillie’s a conservative, I have a question for him: Conservatives traditionally support free enterprise; does it bother him in the least that he wants to fine and arrest people for committing voluntary, consensual acts of free enterprise (hiring workers, accepting jobs, renting apartments)?
On this issue, conservatives are as enthusiastic for social engineering as any socialist. They are willing to curtail economic freedom when it clashes with their cherished goal of planning the composition of the U.S. population. With friends like these, free enterprise hardly needs enemies.

Will Devanter, Wheat Ridge

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (15) | TrackBack

Salazar owes us an explanation

After 21/2 very quiet years in the Senate, Ken Salazar has finally found a cause that is worth his passion and effort. According to news accounts, he has spent much of the past few months negotiating the details of the first major change to immigration law in 20 years.
Unfortunately, the proposed bill is a disaster. Its most important impact would be to greatly increase the numbers of immigrants, legal and illegal, flowing into our country. Who really thinks rewarding more than 10 million illegal immigrants with legal residency will help get our borders under control?
Salazar owes his constituents an explanation of how this massive increase in immigration will be good for our country. He is a senator from Colorado, not Mexico.
Yet no such explanation has been forthcoming. He has even called opponents of his bill “bomb throwers” on the floor of the U.S. Senate, where we sent him to represent us.
Yet the questions remain: How will flooding our labor markets help working Americans negotiate better wages?
How will doubling the U.S. population over the next 35 years, as this bill promises to do, help us protect our environment and create a sustainable society?

Philip Cafaro, Fort Collins

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (23) | TrackBack

Still time to stop this immigration betrayal

Ten percent of Mexico’s population resides in the United States — illegally. “Judas” Bush and the pro-amnesty faction in Congress are proposing to sell these invaders citizenship for a few pieces of silver.
In his prophetic new book, State of Emergency, Pat Buchanan discusses the effects of immigration, legal and illegal, and its danger to our nation. He, along with many others, concludes that unless action is taken to restore the sovereignty of this country, its destruction is assured.
There is still time to put a stop to this betrayal. Write, call or e-mail the White House, your senators and representatives immediately and demand they vote to stop this travesty.
The mindless mob rants “racism” and “nativism” when alerted to this peril. The call to action of the patriot must be “Attrition, yes! Amnesty, no!”

Alan Hale, Brighton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (25) | TrackBack

Moral high ground?

The U.S. commanding general in Iraq recently admonished the troops to “take the moral high ground” regarding illegal and unnecessary violence and property destruction by our troops.
Taking the moral high ground is problematic when the commander-in-chief and the vice president have violated U.S. citizens’ civil rights and have decided that the Geneva Conventions are optional.
I am an honorably discharged veteran from the Vietnam era. I am disappointed by the president’s and vice president’s disregard for law.

Randall Nelson, Golden

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (9) | TrackBack

A simple solution

If people are so upset by Spanish-speaking folks working at McDonald’s (“McLanguage barrier,” May 17), I offer them a simple solution: don’t eat there.
If you don’t like what a company is doing, don’t give it your money. This is how capitalism works. If enough people stop giving McDonald’s money, the company will change its ways.
The best part of this plan? You don’t need the government to make it work.

Paul Preston, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (16) | TrackBack

Abstinence provides very happy results

Regarding Rep. Diana DeGette’s Speakout column of May 26, “Abstinence programs useless,” here’s the deal:
If “Abstinence-only programs fly in the face of scientific and medical research, public opinion and common sense ... ” could DeGette please explain how I and my wife followed that philosophy before our marriage, and we have three adult children (one still single) who have followed an abstinence-only (until marriage) way of living, and we have found great joy, fulfillment, no guilt, no abortions, no STDs, no emotional baggage to deal with?
And we are not unique. We know many who have followed this same lifestyle to very good results.
So here is my question for DeGette: Could she give me the “scientific and medical research” that demonstrates how one can get pregnant or get STDs by practicing abstinence?

Steve Cummings, Thornton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (17) | TrackBack

A pole-and-wire scar

Now that costs for FasTracks have gone over budget by nearly $1.5 billion, and with the Regional Transportation District short nearly $670 million, we are being told that there will be a proposed plan on the table to “put all of the new transit lines out for bidding by private companies.”
As far as I am concerned, this new measure comes too late. We already have an abundance of mistakes in parking deficiencies, ridiculously long and exposed walkways, unsafe stations and high costs of usage, not to mention a line that goes nowhere. Most regretfully of all, we have a pole-and-wire scar on the face of what once was a beautiful Colorado. Progress — where were you when we needed you?

Marilyn Kopelman, Greenwood Village

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

A DIFFERING VIEW: Immigration opponents killed driver’s license bill

There’s been so much confusion around House Bill 1313, which I sponsored, that I think it’s having an identity crisis! (“Driver’s license sanity,” Rocky editorial, June 5.)

As widely reported, Colorado citizens were unable to get driver’s licenses or photo ID cards because the Division of Motor Vehicles had adopted overly stringent rules. The bill would have clarified the documents legal residents must present to get a state ID.

Applicants could use government-issued documents, such as U.S. passports, some out-of-state licenses, birth certificates and military IDs as proof of legal status. All documents provided must be secure and verifiable in accordance with current law. Staff at the DMV were free to take more time to verify documents that are not in wide use.

Opponents, led largely by right-wing radio talk-show hosts, trumped up concerns that the bill would allow illegal immigrants to get identification. Through misrepresentation and politically motivated rhetoric, the legislation was mischaracterized as an immigration issue.

Illegal immigration is a legitimate concern, one that I share. That’s why a year ago, the legislature passed the toughest package of immigration laws in the country.

Unfortunately, anti-immigration activists who misrepresented HB 1313 managed to get their voices heard. Subsequently, the governor vetoed the bill.

Now citizens must rely on the DMV to ensure that legal residents who are entitled to receive a state ID will be able to do so. I hope the DMV will provide appropriate and responsive customer service to the citizens of Colorado.

Rosemary Marshall, a Democrat from Denver, represents House District 8 in the Colorado General Assembly.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

June 06, 2007
Funding priorities

Carolyn Bninski of Boulder writes:

Congress’s funding of the war on Iraq, U.S. threats of military action against Iran and U.S. support for the illegal Israeli occupation of Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem have a profound and daily impact on every person in the U.S. Wars and occupation drain our economic resources, devouring funds that are needed for environmental, recreational and social programs and creating large amounts of debt which will be born by future generations.
When Congress diverts funds from social programs to the war machine, they devastate the conditions necessary for equality, justice and democracy in our society. As a result, our collective well-being suffers. When we kill the innocent of other lands by the thousands and destroy the lives of millions with our tanks, artillery, bombers, and other weapons, we become a feared and hated nation. And we become subjects for attack because the victims will want to strike back.
Come join us at a Town Hall meeting on Thursday, June 7 to discuss what we can do to stop these illegal actions that are being committed in our name.
The meeting will be at 7 p.m. at Humanities 1B50, University of Colorado, Boulder.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 01:48 PM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Virginia Tech killer

Scott Mock of Boulder writes:

John McCain, would-be president, is quoted thusly in regard to the Virginia Tech massacre: “This brutal attack was not caused by, nor should it lead to restrictions on, the Second Amendment, which guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms.”
The Second Amendment to the Constitution actually guarantees nothing of the kind: “A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
Anyone who claims that Seung-Hui Cho constituted a well-regulated militia” is either a liar, a lunatic or, in the case of gun-loving Republicans, both.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:51 PM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Carbon dioxide

Richard C. Savage of Franktown writes:

Some say President Bush acted too quickly, on the basis of bad information, to invade Iraq.
Ironically, many of the same people now say we must act IMMEDIATELY to stop emission of CO2 - which may cause global warming - which may be more than 2 degrees F - which may be a crisis (according to Gore) - which may be acting too quickly, on the basis of bad information.
Unfortunately our knowledge of “global warming” is even less certain than our knowledge of Saddam’s WMD. Let’s not make war on carbon dioxide, and the American economy, until we know more about “global warming” than we did about IRAQ’s WMD.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:50 PM | Comments (17) | TrackBack

Illegal immigrants

Ernest E. Valdez of Thornton writes:

Letter writer C. Crosier (The Breaking Point, May 24) leaves himself or herself wide open by asking, “Why on earth would any patriotic American citizen think that it is OK to grant such an honored and privileged status as citizenship to anybody who so blatantly and arrogantly violates our laws?” Business owners, business managers, investors, by the tens of thousands, that’s who. God fearing people by the millions, thats who. People who realize that the Bible says love your neighbor regardless of who they are or where they are from, thats who. What an eerie, wayward question to ask.
Evidently, the letter writer is not a business owner, business manager, investor, or a religous person. In case Crosier didn’t know, business owners and business managers are very much in need of hiring good workers.
In case Crosier was not aware, these immigrants numbering in the millions are just what the business owners and managers are looking for and they greet them with open arms. Investors by the hundreds of thousands greet them with open arms also because these people who Crosier so very much maligns, help keep our economy going. As an investor, home owner, avid grocery store customer, English teacher, deeply religious person, I love and welcome, these immigrants from the South.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:49 PM | Comments (51) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Sandra Gordon Pettijohn of Denver writes:

As I see the front page of the May 25 Rocky Mountain News, I weep.
The poignant photograph of the incredibly courageous, paralyzed Staff Sgt. Matthew Keil, held in the warm embrace of his loving family, is heartbreaking.
Heartbreaking, too, is the headline below: “Congress bends to Bush, approves Iraq funds without timeline.”
If there is no timeline, when will the war that George Bush proclaimed as “Mission Accomplished” over four years ago end?
How many other Matthews will there be? When, and in what condition, will they come home?
In light of last November’s election, widely considered a mandate against the President’s Iraq policy, why did only one member of the Colorado Congressional delegation, the principled Ed Permutter, vote against pouring $95,000,000,000 more into it?
I wonder how the others from Colorado, from Congress, would vote if Matthew Keil were their child? For in truth, I believe, he is.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:48 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Military pay raise

Stephen R. Thrapp of Boulder writes:

Well, this is interesting. Monday morning, Memorial Day 2007. I’m reading my copy of the Rocky Mountain News. Front page picture of a veteran sitting in the cemetery at Fort Logan. Good articles about veterans and their sacrifices.
Sunday Denver Post, too, had great articles about the fallen and our need to remember them. No doubt, the Post/News supports our troops.
Then I turn to the Spotlight section, and the comics. I’ve only a few favorites; I’m anxious to check their take on the day.
I get to “Candorville,” and there’s something about President Bush refusing to give our troops a 3.5% pay raise. Hmm. I go back through the news and editorial sections of the Rocky, looking for more about this. Nothing.
So I go to the RockyMountainNews online, do a search for “Military Pay Raise.” Still nothing.
So I go to Google, where the same search instantly brings up the story - U.S. House of Representatives votes overwhelmingly for 3.5% pay raise for the military, but White House says it’s too much - wants only 3.0%. The half-percent difference amounts to $265 million a year. A tiny percentage of the military budget.
Yet our supposedly pro-troop President threatens to veto it! We have a son on his second tour in Baghdad right now, and are only too familiar with the strain this interminable war is creating on servicemen and women, and their families. And now, on Memorial Day, I learn that his Commander-in-Chief, who personally engineered billions in tax cuts for this country’s increasingly wealthy super-rich, and who recently extended the tours of those paying the full measure of sacrifice to protect them, and all of us, begrudges those same servicemen and women a 3.5% pay raise! Not only that, but my first knowledge of this comes not from my hometown newspaper’s news or editorial sections, but from its comics section!
The San Jose Mercury News saw fit to publish a David Broder editorial on this situation in its Memorial Day edition. Why has the Rocky apparently ignored it? Who is controlling what appears in our paper, and why?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:46 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Iraq war

William Buchtel of Arvada writes:

A while back a gentleman wrote that if you learn from the past you would make the same mistakes again. I agree with him on that. But I think that he should used World War II as the example. For when the Allies was pushing the Germans back on all fronts, The Government and the Military told them that if they would only wait just a little longer that victory was jus around the next corner. As the Allies drove deeper into Germany once again the Government and the Military told the people that if anyone surrendered they would be shot (some of you would love this). They also had a surge, sent thousands of new troops into battle. We would call it The Battle of the Bulge. Al this done was to rise the casualty rate.
As the old saying goes meanwhile back in the Pacific, the Japanese once mighty Army, Navy and Air Force was just a shell of itself. People in the Government and the Military still would not admit defeat. Even after two atomic bombs some believed that total annihilation of the Japanese Nation was better than admit defeat. It wasn’t till the Emperor of Japan when on radio and told the people that the war had gone the way it was planed (dose this sound familiar) that peace was finally at hand.
I don’t know if these questions have even been asked, so I will.
How many American lives would it take before you started to think that this may be a bad idea? A) 5,000 B) 10,000 C) 25,000 or D) the number of dead is not importance.
How long would you have us stay in Iraq? A) 5 years B) 10 years C) 25 years D) we plan on making Iraq the 51st state. Don’t laugh this has some good points. Look at what it would do for our oil reserve. We could build all kinds of new refinery. We would have a seat in OPEC (the oil companies would love this). Instead of sending hundreds of billions of dollars overseas we would sending them to our own state.
Also we would just some money back in from of tax. Then FEMA could take over from the Military (oops bad idea).
I do see some down side. 1 when uses the phone, press 1 for English, 2 for Spanish, 3 for Arabic. Also we would go from bilingual to trilingual.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:45 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Teen sexuality & pregnancy

Mary Pott of Golden writes:

The problem with teen pregnancy is not as, Toni Panetta, deputy director of NARAL, stated, “that women are not using contraception” (RMN 5/21). The problem is our young people are more sexually active and this behavior is not discouraged outside of marriage it is celebrated, remarkably in places like Boulder Valley High School. It would seem that the administration at Boulder Valley High School agrees with Rep. DeGette who has authored the “Prevention First Act” . Those of us who spend a lot of time talking with our children about the value and dignity of their sexuality are undermined by our legislators and school administrators who say our young people are incapable of controlling their sexual urges and so must be treated with a dose of contraception that neither eliminates all sexually transmitted diseases nor guarantees pregnancy prevention. The $176 million dollars that are directed toward abstinence education cannot possibly compete with the billions of dollars from the entertainment and consumer industries that use sex to sell their products to our children. If Rep. DeGette’s ideas are implemented by the likes of the panel that was allowed to present at Boulder Valley High School, we parents are going to have to work even harder. That’s our job but it’s not getting any easier.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:44 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Immigration bill

Larry Harrison of Lakewood writes:

The word “stealth” brings to mind secretive or furtive activity/behavior. The word conjures up a vision of actions conducted in the dark or behind closed doors, contrary to the best interests of other than the plotters and their chosen constituency. In all candor, the Senate should label their current efforts “The Comprehensive Stealth Immigration Proposal.” The proposal saw its first light-of-day thanks to a draft being posted on The Heritage Foundations’ website on May 19 with Congressional proponents determined to approve the proposal by Memorial Day, May 28. The only Senators truly familiar with the proposed bill are those who labored behind closed doors in its development. The other Senators and the general public are expected to base their judgment of the proposal on proponents’ views. Can the general public believe this proposal will “fix” the problems of open borders and illegal aliens? Based on the general public’s lack of information on the proposal’s actual composition and absolutely no input into it, The Heritage Foundations’ preliminary review of the proposal that has revealed glaring problems and Congress’ abysmal track record with immigration legislation from the previous 1986 amnesty bill to date, the vital importance of this legislation to the future of this great Nation necessitates that Congress get off the “stealth” wagon and conduct business with full public disclosure.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:43 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

‘Islamofascists’

Richard A. Dick Piekarski, Golden

In recent weeks, several letter writers have used the term “Islamofascists.” Sadly, the terminology indicates that not only is our Administration subverting our democracy, it is perverting our language with new terms created for their connotative and emotive value. It goes without saying or explanation that an Islamofascist must be a bad person. Using language CONnotatively is usually the prerogative of folks who seek to CON someone. They sway people with words that provoke good or bad feelings.
So what might an Islamofascist be, a Moslem who supports the control of government by the corporate sector? After all, Benito Mussolini, the father of fascism, explained that, “fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of State and Corporate power.” Doesn’t sound like Islamic extremism to me.
Accordingly, in this country we no doubt have many Christofascists and Semitofascists. And while we’re making up words, how about informofascists? Those are corporate-owned news media folks who publish government pronouncements without regard for truth or accuracy, thus lending credibility to questionable propaganda.
Of course, we can’t ignore the ignoramofascists, the folks who have adopted the term Islamofascist without question, and now will respond to this letter with ad hominem attacks (against the messenger not the message), calling me a “socialist” and “America-hater,” when all I’m doing is helping our Administration label all the enemies of freedom and democracy. Can anyone be opposed to that? (Cue the patriotic music, unfurl the flag, drop the red, white and blue balloons, stir the emotions.)

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:42 PM | Comments (44) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Pete Klammer of Wheat Ridge writes:

This cause cannot justify these means. Victory in Iraq would forever dignify and rationalize and sanctify the deceitful tyranny of this Republicans’ pre-emptive invasion of another sovereign nation.
Freedom does not result in democracy, not in all cases, not in every context. The Bush-administration neoconservatives deluded the President and the people with promises, that all we had to do is unclear the oppressed Iraqis and a thousand democratic flowers would bloom. It is not a criticism of Iraqi ethnicity, this is not a racist claim nor argument of mental deficiency to say that they can’t handle freedom. But they are not prepared: there is not a culture or tradition of public trust and informed participation in self-governance; on the contrary, there are many traditions of tribalism, vendetta, and charismatic factionalism. You open the stops on that, and you don’t get heavenly organ music. The neoconservatives are inherently averse to academic liberal thought — the educational background of the Jeffersonian-era philosophy which founded our nation — but rather put blind faith in the corrective powers of capitalistic market forces. As if Iraq’s oil wealth would trickle down and magically transform them into happy burqa- and turban-wearing western-style consumers. They didn’t understand what is primary — liberal democratic philosophy — and what is secondary, or consequential: a prosperous and peaceful society. Instead, they thrust freedom and wealth (including pallets — LITERALLY TONS — of cash intended to lubricate commerce) upon an unprepared society and assumed democracy would spontaneously erupt as a side-effect. I suppose they give their teenaged children buckets of cash and keys to new cars, too, eh?
Pre-emptive invasion must not be rewarded. Tyrannical aggressive shock-and-awe warfare must not become profitable policy. Crass and calculated manipulation of press and public by lies, big lies, and repeated propagandistic lies must not succeed. No future administration or generation can be allowed to evaluate that as heinous as it was, it was worth it in the end.
We must lose in Iraq, or we will lose the American soul.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:40 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Immigration bill

Richard Yale of Longmont writes:

Whose problem is the immigration bill in Congress supposed to solve? The country’s problem, with dangerously porous borders? The illegal immigrants’ problem? Or, the politicians’ problem?
Virtually every step that Congress and the Administration have taken toward securing the border has been backed into under pressure from the voters. The National Guardsmen who were sent to the border but not assigned to guard the border, the 700-mile fence on paper that has become the two-mile fence in practice, and the existing “tough” penalties for the crime of crossing the border illegally that in practice mean turning the illegal border crossers loose so that they can try again.
The new immigration bill supposedly would secure the borders administratively, but does not wait to see if administration in fact reduces the flow of illegal immigrants before taking the irrevocable step of making American citizenship available to 12 million who came here illegally. This solves the problem of those illegal immigrants who want to get citizenship; the steps that they have to go through only allow politicians to say that this is not amnesty because these steps are “tough". There is nothing to say that any of the 12 million people here illegally shall start the process of becoming citizens.
This bill gets the issue out of the political spotlight solving the problem of politicians to mollify American voters without risking loss of the Hispanic vote. Meaning the growth of the illegal population is irreversible but the means of controlling the growth of illegal’s are quite reversible Both de facto through the watering down of the enforcement of “tough”
requirements and de jure through later repeals deeming the requirements too “tough” on the privileged class.
But no penalties are likely to be enforced against state and local politicians who openly declare “sanctuary” for illegal immigrants. Officials sworn to uphold the law instead forbid the police to report the illegal status of immigrants to federal officials when these illegal’s are arrested for other crimes. This is perfectly consistent for a bill that seeks above all to solve politicians’ problems, not the country’s.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:40 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Diana DeGette & abstinence

Kenny Gilfilen of Lakewood writes:

Representative Diane DeGette opined about President Bush in her May 26 opinion piece about how abstinence programs are ineffective in ending teen pregnancy, writing that if Bush wants \[progress\] he should let facts, not ideology, dictate his policy. As if she has mastered the facts that are available. These facts are actually scientific studies, which usually contain authoritative information about something, but often it is not what their users think. Most consumers of science bring their own prejudices, and fundamentally misunderstand what is being measured and what can be concluded based on the questions asked, and based on the investigative design that purports to ask and answer those questions.
We all know this, but maybe don’t understand it. We discount the conclusions and doubt the science of those with whom we disagree. I might discount Global Warming, for example. I don’t doubt the observations of those scientists, but I doubt the conclusions pundits have about those observations. And we shouldn’t despise people who refuse to fall in line behind our conclusions, at least not publicly. Maybe our politics cloud our vision, and prejudice our grasp of the facts.
DeGette states that the US has the highest teen pregnancy rate in the Western world, “clearly what we are doing is not working”. I don’t doubt her statistics. But her point is that we’ve been pursuing a solution, the problem is still bad, so that solution doesn’t work. She states that children must be educated, implying that until now, they have not been.
I’d say she oversimplifies a cultural problem that has many origins that needs addressing from many directions.
My personal preference for a solution, if I had a magic wand, would be for parents to be better parents; for government to be responsible for almost nothing in society (certainly not the reduction of teen pregnancy); and especially keeping legislators from legislating things they don’t understand. When government resources are dedicated to a problem, existing resources are redirected elsewhere, leaving no one but feckless bureaucrats to solve the problem in question.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:38 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Gas prices

Hank Riehl of Lone Tree writes:

Guest commentator Bill Bloomberg (Gas Price 101) was long on hot air and short on any economic common sense. In fact, his entire commentary was a cornucopia of misinformation. His “double dividend” tax reallocation scheme diverts tax money away from FICA taxes and piles it on dollar for dollar in the form of gasoline and diesel consumption taxes. This would not only accelerate the demise of an already financially broken Social Security and Medicare system, it would also unfairly exclude the many millions of federal, state and city employees throughout America who are not FICA participants as well as the many millions of retired folks (also non-FICA participants) all of whom would see their fuel costs skyrocket without any offsetting benefit. For all these many millions of folks, Bloomberg’s “double dividend” tax scheme is a major $2 to $3 dollar per gallon (energy) tax hike without any offsetting benefits; a classic misallocation of financial resources. Obviously his tax scheme is not revenue neutral (arithmetic 101) as he wrongly states.
The Bloomberg “double dividend” tax misallocation scheme would result in a major drag on the economy, incomes and jobs by extracting money from the economic pipeline. It would put Detroit and related infrastructure industries out of business in a heartbeat. It also destroys a system best served by market forces; there is no such thing as a “free lunch” in a market driven economy. You simply can’t tax your way into prosperity.
Mr. Bloomberg is an engineer employed by yet another solar energy company that supplies little or no energy. Such companies are not part of the solution. It is no wonder that he failed to consider increasing the “supply” of crude oil in the “supply and demand” equation. After all, with 85% of the outer continental shelf out of bounds, ANWR out of bounds, no new crude oil refineries or nuclear power plants built in the past 30 years, Mr.
Bloomberg lives at the trough of a very friendly misallocation of resources.
It is understandable, therefore, that his solar agenda could not get past channeling energy from the stars rather than advocating the more obvious solutions. His attempt to re-engineer the law of supply and demand with a tax scheme, moreover, would only further misallocate financial, economic and natural resources. Karl Marx would be happy to see Bloomberg’s America driving down “the road to serfdom.” No thanks.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:37 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Drunken patient

Dale Embleton of Aurora writes:

When I check into a hospital I expect to be well cared for in a timely manner. If I am taken to a hospital and I am drunk, the whole care process is necessarily altered, because the hospital personnel must be wary of me for their own safety and mine. When drunk I am often unpredictable, selfish, uncooperative, and a big baby or a big bully.
The next day I may be embarrassed about my conduct and only grudgingly tell others about my reckless debauch. Or with my ego bristling I lash out at those who tried to help me and keep me from hurting myself and others. Seems to me that Howe has been psychologically injured before this event and perceiving herself a victim doesn’t mind being publicly humiliated so long as she can get some money out of it. Personal responsibility becomes casualty to ego and greed. How’s that for cruel and snidely vicious?

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:29 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Time to drop Boulder High controversy

I’d like to thank Rocky Mountain News media critic Dave Kopel for “Talk-show hosts amok,” his well-written On the Media column of June 2 about the Caplis & Silverman Show radio vendetta against Boulder High School.
Dan Caplis and Craig Silverman are blowing this out of proportion.
I listen to C&S when I can and have found the show to be interesting and entertaining especially when both sides of the issues are presented fairly and thoughtfully and would like to see the same done here. The show came closer to doing this recently when a psychologist from Boulder and Kopel were interviewed.
After listening to the tape from the workshop in question, I don’t like or condone much of what was said and I agree with the steps that BHS has already taken to make it clear that these workshops are optional. There may even be justification for a letter from Boulder school officials disavowing their support for some of what was said, but the “off with their heads” sentiment is way over the top.
Let’s give some credit to our young people who, I believe, are very capable of thinking for themselves. And let’s also credit BHS for the things it does in making it one of only two Colorado high schools listed in the Top 200 in Newsweek’s annual Top 1,200 High Schools in America listing (www.msnbc.
msn.com/id/12532678/site/newsweek/), surpassed only by Lakewood High School.
It’s time to let this story drop and get on to the far more important subjects that deserve attention and thoughtful discussion.

Tim Sandsmark, Littleton

Posted by denver-admin at 09:30 AM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

Parents the problem

The subheadline on Rocky Mountain News media critic Dave Kopel’s June 2 defense of the recent Conference on World Affairs panel discussion at Boulder High School asks, “If most parents aren’t upset, why do Caplis, Silverman carry on so?”
That is one of the major problems of parents today: They are not upset with what their kids are taught. They don’t give them moral guidance or slap their little behinds. If it makes you feel good, have at it.
If I had a child in Boulder High School, I would pull him or her out of there so fast the suction of that withdrawal would whisk the three principals in this degrading episode out into the street where the trash men would pick them up and toss them and the rest of their garbage at the nearest dump.

R.P. Traynor, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 09:28 AM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

A DIFFERING VIEW: Greatest terrorists are industry, government

Recently, the Rocky Mountain News condemned as terrorists activists from the Earth and Animal Liberation Fronts for their strikes against Vail Mountain, SUVs and similar targets (“Yes, they’re terrorists,” May 29). While one might hold objections to the tactics of activists who damage institutions that perpetuate environmental destruction and animal suffering, labeling them as terrorists is highly shortsighted.

Global studies show that 80 percent of the forests on this planet are cleared, 75 percent of marine life is exploited and 23 percent of all mammals are threatened species as a direct result of the industrial expansion of the developed world. One million animals raised in squalid and cruel conditions are slaughtered every hour for American consumption and industry profit. All of this occurs with the acquiescence and support of the U.S. government.

Violence committed against the government or private property within this nation is denounced and avenged without a second thought. Regardless, the violence committed by these sectors is defended as progress.

For proponents of global destruction, the homemade bombs, spray paint and fires of direct activism are convenient to label as terrorism. However, when put to scale, it is clear to see that the factory farms, toxic waste, overfishing, expansion, habitat destruction and climate change caused by government and business are truly the most reprehensible form of violence.

Zoë Williams is a resident of Denver.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (40) | TrackBack

June 05, 2007
Driver testing

Mark A. Golden of Aurora writes:

Beware Citizens. I spoke with an old friend the other day, who told me a Police Supervisor was been issued a reprimand because one of his Officers did not issue enough traffic summons last month. The old revenue generator is still hard at work. Can anyone in Aurora say “Quota System”.
This brought to mind a true incident of several years ago. I was driving East on 16th Ave., where the side streets have stop signs. A car pulled up to the stop sign and, as I approached, the driver pulled out in front of me and drove away. I missed striking his car by inches, so I used lights and siren to pull him over. As I approached, I noticed he was a Foreign National. After some effort in explaining I needed his driver’s license and registration, I finally had them in hand and began explaining why I had stopped him. I stated “You didn’t stop completely at the stop sign.” He stated in broken English “I stop!” I then knew he did not know he had to remain stopped until traffic was clear. With my limited knowledge of his language and 15 minutes, I explained the Rules of the Road.
This brings the point of this article. We need to take the drivers testing out of the hands of the “All Mighty Dollar”, chasers “Dept. of Revenue” and put it in the hands (along with additional resources) of the people who pick up the dead bodies off our highways, “The State Patrol”. The Dept. of Revenue allows too many “Translators” to take the tests for these Foreign National in an effort to increase revenues. We need to increase safety and if that is at the cost of revenues in this area, “then so be it”. Our safety is more important than a few bucks in the coffers and RTD needs more people to take the newly opened mass transit system. TWO PROBLEMS SOLVED!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:37 AM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Rep. Diana DeGette & abstinence

David A. Villecco, Ph.D., of Broomfield writes:

I do not understand Diana DeGette’s reasoning. She seems sincerely to want to stop unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. Her answer is “not to be rigid like President Bush,” by sticking to steadfast principles. But this is exactly what we should do. Should we abandon similar teaching that we shouldn’t kill, steal, or lie because these things continue to exist? Or should we suggest as she puts it, to teach “ honest accurate sex info” taught by medical experts (?) who teach us that it’s OK to be promiscuous as long as you have “protection” and are careful. She seems to believe in the eleventh commandment, “Don’t get caught....” But, if caught, use anti-biotics, abortion providers, marriage counselors, divorce courts, etc. There’s always a way for “safe sex.” .....almost always..if you compromise on principles and do not become “steadfast in your beliefs” like George Bush.
What doesn’t work is to deviate from the age-old time tested wisdom which is eminently reasonable and which is expressed in the rock solid ten commandments. Despite the vagaries of well-meaning but incredibly ignorant efforts of legislators like Diana DeGette, we should always teach and hold as self-evident that we should not steal, not kill, not lie and not fornicate despite the dubious track record of a struggling humanity. We see the right and approve it, too.
We see the wrong and the wrong pursue.
That’s the fact. Let’s own up to it...but not give up. Abstinence is not useless. It works!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:37 AM | Comments (71) | TrackBack

Iraq war

Richard Hiatt of Guffey writes:

When viewing footage of Nazis marching down the Champs-Elysees in June, 1940, when Hitler is sightseeing down the Place de l’Etoile and around the Eiffel Tower with Parisian residents either conspicuously absent or visibly in the throes of deep despair, I see painfully similar scenarios on CBS and FOX of America’s Middle East occupation: “stormtroopers” breaking down doors and rounding up “suspects,” sending them off to detention camps to be tortured (with no rights), old women and children showing hate so indelibly pressed into their faces that they would relish killing an American, the truth censored from the bevolkern, human violations, shock and awe, reigns of terror on the poor and helpless, lies/betrayals, war crimes, selling fear at home about “the Resistance” (aka, “insurgency”).
Ultimately time conflates and events transpose irregardless of the so-called casus belli, (a burning Reichstag or a 9/11). Add the Nazi-styled helmet adopted by our military and it only crystallizes what we apparently don’t want to see. Add private/covert mercenary armies like Blackwater USA (a latter-day “SS”) and the fog begins to lift.
Both “crusades” require(d) abundant lies and steady supplies of paranoia: “Liberating the oppressed,” “safeguarding the homeland,” hunting “terrorists” hostile to the domestic weltanschauung, leaders answering to “a higher authority” while pledged to divide et impera, Dei gratia!, and, lastly, feeling as if in “the eye of a storm. All around us winds are swirling” (Bush, 5/23/07). History does indeed repeat what isn’t learned.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:36 AM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

National Guard legislation

Jane Feustel of Colorado Progressive Action in Denver writes:

Re: Dems offer plans for troops, May 25, 2007 story

After the disappointing approval of a toothless, blank-check supplemental funding bill for the endless war in Iraq, it is hard to maintain faith or optimism in the ability of our elected officials to get us out of Bush’s mess of a war. All of Colorado’s Congressional delegationwith the exception of Rep. Ed Perlmutter and Rep. Diana DeGettevoted for this supplemental bill that has no timeline for withdrawal, weak bench marks for the Iraqi government, and no standards for troop readiness.
Supporting this legislation supports escalation in Iraq meaning troops will be spread more thin, there will be increased violence and death, and more funding diverted from vital domestic programs such as funding for higher education and children’s health insurance.
Coloradans can see a glimmer of hope in legislation introduced by Perlmutter and DeGette that would call for the redeployment of all National Guard troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan within 90 days of the bill’s enactment. Although not a complete solution, this bill is a step in the right direction by bringing home the National Guard troops who are needed here in the states for when we face unexpected natural disasterssuch as the horrible blizzards this last winter or the tornadoes this spring. We thank Reps. DeGette and Perlmutter for their leadership and commitment to Colorado’s National Guard.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:34 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Illegal immigrants

Denise M. Luepschen of Lakewood writes:

Sob stories tell about illegal aliens hoping for passage of the immigration reform bill. We Americans are generous to a fault, as long as we have no idea of the cost. How will we fund the new demands on Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, food stamps, and Section 8 housing? Our entire society subsidizes the poor, yet we’re considering officially importing many millions of low-skilled, poorly educated people and their offspring, often from cultures whose highest value for women is bearing children. Poor families are always a net fiscal drain – even the taxes they pay represent a fraction of the cost of benefits they receive.
We do not owe illegal aliens this great gift of legitimacy and potential citizenship, permission to radically alter our culture and heavily dilute our workforce with people who place little value on education. If Mexico allows dual citizenship and Mexicans comprise the lion’s share of illegal aliens, why would any Mexican give up Mexican citizenship when he can be both? We must secure our borders, enforce current law, and eliminate jobs for illegal workers. We must penalize American companies that fill their pockets while the rest of us pay the costs.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:34 AM | Comments (41) | TrackBack

Denver Public Schools

Doris Goodteacher, Sarah Friend, Samanda Davis, Joe Waldon, Andrea Grasso, Denise Palma and Joy Hanson write:

As social workers who work in the Denver Public Schools, we were very interested in your series “Leaving to Learn” about students and their parents choosing to enroll outside DPS. We reviewed your articles and feel that parts of the story were left out.
-- Many of our students have mental health, behavioral and/or health difficulties that affect their academic success. These students need mental health and health assistance to help keep them in the classrooms learning. When essential positions were listed in your final editorial, vital personnel that help students with those difficulties were omitted. These include nurses, psychologists, counselors, social workers and others.
-- Nowhere throughout the series did we read about the efforts being made to address the significant problem of truancy and the dropout rate. Social workers in particular strive to keep students in school through truancy reduction efforts such as making home visits, helping students build positive relationships with teachers and peers, recruiting community members to help combat truancy, and many other efforts.
-- The issue of the impact of poverty was not adequately addressed.
How do we help students and families overcome barriers to achieve academic success? Support staff work to meet needs created by poverty, but the job is difficult. Currently most of the support staff in DPS are staffed at about 1/3 of nationally recommended levels.
The multiple problems that students face must be validated and addressed, whichever school systems they and their families choose.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:33 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Oil

Roger Orr of Boulder writes:

Dependence Day is that day each year when we’ve used as much oil as we produce domestically, essentially leaving us dependent on foreign imports for the rest of the year. It’s a problem a lot of politicians have paid lip service to, but few have taken real action on.
Instead, the proposals we get from DC are more of the same old same old. Drilling our pristine areas for every last drop of oil. But guess what? Less than 2% of the world’s remaining oil supply is here in the U.S., and we need to wake up to the fact that we’ll never drill our way to energy independence.
What we need is to promote renewable energy as a country and independently. Also, we need to start working and living closer to home. This means driving less and getting to know your neighbors and community.
If the people in Denver would work in Denver, and the people in Boulder would work in Boulder... We would have a substantial decrease in traffic, just by this step step alone.
Also, Corporate America needs to start analyzing the need to have workers commute to a specific location every day. With today’s technological advancements, it is possible to have remote workers. This would save our planet by reducing carbon emissions.
Corporations and Families would also benefit from this practice by reducing the costs of commuting, and reducing Corporate costs to house employees in buildings that are no longer necessary to have.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:32 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Unintended pregnancies

Lizzy Annison of Denver, Colorado director of public affairs for Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, writes:

Unintended pregnancies can represent a real challenge for women and families regardless of age. “Teen Pregnancy Dilemma” 5/21 discussed many of the factors surrounding this issue but failed to mention a step forward taken for Colorado youth this past legislative session: The passage of House Bill 1292, Comprehensive Sex Education.
The federal government recently commissioned a study by The Mathematica Institute to look at the effectiveness of the abstinence only until marriage programs that, thus far, have received nearly one billion dollars from the federal government. The result? “Findings indicate that youth in the [abstinence only] program group were no more likely than the control group youth to have abstained from sex, and among those who reported having had sex, they had similar numbers of sexual partners and initiated sex at the same mean age.”
Colorado ranks 22nd in the nation in total teen pregnancies. Every hour in Colorado a teenager becomes pregnant. We can do better for our young people. It is time to put our resources toward programs that put prevention first like House Bill 1292. Now if a school teaches human sexuality the information used must be medically-accurate, age-appropriate and comprehensive. We know that teens with good information make good decisions.
Unplanned pregnancy can represent a real challenge for women and their families. Let’s start getting at the root of the problem and give our young people the education, information and services they need to make responsible choices.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:31 AM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Republican leadership

James J. Tenant (no hometown provided) writes:

It is sick, while we are honoring our brave souls who served in America’s wars, Bill Owens economic capital-punishment of CU Prof. Ward Churchill, is being finalized. Churchill answered America’s call for him to serve in Vietnam. Tancredo (nuke Mecca), Giuliani, Romney (Mormon Mission/separation of church and state), Bush (Guard country-club), Cheney (deferments), Allard (communist-sider), Lott (ole Miss cheerleader), Boehner, and Owens (cong. page deferred), all opted to ignore her call. This band of brothers, owe a lot of apologizes, because when Vietnam broke-out, they broke for their mama’s dress-tails, college, ski-slopes, and shopping malls.
Gov. Ritter, patriot, recently signed a bill giving gays protection in the workplace, a bill that Owens has repeatedly vetoed. Owens and his GOP posse with their gay marriage and flag-burning bans, should cough up a few apologizes here. They weren’t publicly vocal against gays, when gays were fighting and dying in their stead in Vietnam. They weren’t even vocal in opposition when black “soldier-draftees, who were 55% of those killed in Vietnam (in-country), while we comprised only 12% of the nation’s population. However, they’ve shown their collective patriotism, by starting a needless, barbaric, and senseless war in BodyBagDad, Iraq-NAM.
Where did the GOP’s blood and treasure break to? I proudly join U.S. Rep. Jack Murtha (USMC Vietnam War hero), “I wouldn’t serve in today’s armed forces with these guys and their deferments.”

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:31 AM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

Boulder High controversy

Gabriella Hecht of Boulder, a sophomore at Boulder High School, writes:

This email is written in response to the report on the O’Reilly Factor in regards to the Conference of World Affairs at Boulder High School. It is intended for not only Mr. O’Reilly, but also for the producers of his show and for Bill O’Reilly’s superiors. Repercussions and a public apology from Mr. O’Reilly is expected. Thank you.

Bill O’Reilly,
As a diligent, well-educated, and open-minded sophomore at Boulder High School, I was extremely offended by your outlandish slanders against my city, my school, and my community. I, unlike you, attended the conference and those “quotes” that you used were taken completely out of context. The panelists were not telling us to go out and have sex and do drugs and not worry about anything. They were using those comments as beginning statements. Each panelist went on to explain that having sex and doing drugs is not something that can be swept under the rug because it IS happening.
They were emphasizing the point that ignorance can lead to the spread of STD’s and unwanted pregnancies and that education about safe sex and drug use can prevent these calamities. This was not a one-sided argument either as each panelist did clearly state that abstinence is the only 100% effective way to not get pregnant and to not contract STD’s. Also, we were not FORCED to go to these conferences. The auditorium was used as a outside location for certain conferences and was open to the general public. This was not a scheme designed to poison children’s minds with evil thoughts, but an informative and engaging conference. Also, the school board and administration, including our principal Bud Jenkins, had no part in organizing this conference. All of the conferences at Boulder High were sponsored by students. They decided on the topic and contacted the panelists. Therefore, it is unfair to judge our school’s administration for “promoting” the views of the panelists. In your report, you not only portrayed a false claim, but wrongfully humiliated us. This whole issue has been blown WAY out of proportion. This report is the perfect example of corruption and political agenda in today’s media. It is so pathetic and I am disgusted that someone like you have used a well-renowned source to slander us. No one is going to be fired because they had NOTHING to do with the conference, and you had no right to say those outrageous claims. YOU should be the one that is held accountable for YOUR actions. Check your facts and your sources before you present another report. We demand that you to make a public apology to our city, our school, our administration, and the students. You cannot slander us without repercussions. We will not stay quiet and lets these lies be spread.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 10:30 AM | Comments (15) | TrackBack

Baseload power not friendly to renewables

As an effective insecticide it was tough to beat DDT. Unfortunately, we eventually realized that DDT was also an environmental disaster.
Now, as we learn more and more about the environmental disaster that is coal-fired electricity, Rocky Mountain News columnist Linda Seebach and the electric company Tri-State are telling us how effective coal-fired electricity is (“Energy conservation a small piece of the pie,” May 19).
What the electric companies aren’t telling us, is that every baseload power plant they build now is just that much less renewable energy that we will be able to build later.
Baseload electricity plants — be they conventional “dirty” coal, integrated gasification combined cycle “cleaner” coal or nuclear — do not play nicely in the grid sandbox with intermittent renewables like wind and solar.
Instead of planning lots of 50-plus-years’ commitment baseload plants and then allowing small amounts of renewable power, I want our power companies to be designing a grid and electric system that can support as much renewable energy as possible — and that means that every baseload power plant under construction or being planned is a mistake.
I guess I wouldn’t mind so much if electric companies paid for their own mistakes, but they don’t. We do.

Ken Regelson, Boulder

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (20) | TrackBack

Can Udall be trusted in the Senate?

“ ... I think some significant progress has been made toward establishing a process for political stability in Iraq.”
Sound like George Bush? Actually it’s our own 2nd Congressional District Rep. Mark Udall. On May 10, Udall joined Republicans and voted against 168 of his own Democrats to vote no on Rep. Jim McGovern’s bill that would have begun redeployment of U.S. forces from Iraq within 90 days and completed withdrawal of most U.S. forces within 180 days after that — basically, nine months in all.
This vote happened only one day after more than half of the Iraqi Parliament signed a legislative bill calling on the U.S. to set a timetable for withdrawal. A March poll showed that 69 percent of Iraqis surveyed said the presence of U.S. soldiers is making the situation in their country worse.
The terrifying human and financial costs of this war are bankrupting the U.S. and endangering our security here at home as Hurricane Katrina and the recent tornado in Kansas have demonstrated.
Udall is deaf to the people of the 2nd District and has proved himself unworthy to be our representative. If we cannot trust him to represent us now, why should he merit our trust in the Senate?

Ellen Stark, Boulder

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Coffman’s ‘lapses’ are not surprising

Why are some now surprised at the most recent Republican ethical scandal, this time in our own secretary of state’s office? (“Coffman restricts workers’ activities/Under new policy, election personnel must avoid politics,” May 18.)
To those who pay attention, Mike Coffman’s “lapses of judgment” and “failures in leadership” are nothing new. This is a man who flies into a rage when someone disagrees with him, and who, at his advanced age, abandoned his state post and sent himself to Iraq in a grandstanding ploy to show his blind support for this administration’s failed policies in the Middle East.
In the 2006 election for secretary of state, voters had a choice between this man and a much more qualified and ethical opponent, but chose the former, in spite of efforts to educate them.
The Republicans dearly need Coffman in this position to oversee elections in Colorado in order to carry out their plan for the 2008 presidential election. It’s “politics as usual” in this country, and we got what we asked for in this case. The upcoming election will be determined by the secretaries of state and other election officials, not by the candidates, as we witnessed in 2000 and 2004.

Joe Felice, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Is Al Gore the new ‘Tailgunner Joe’?

History has not been kind to Sen. Joseph McCarthy. Although there really was an alarming penetration of the U.S. government by Soviet agents, “McCarthyism” is the common term to describe political intimidation and stifling of dissent. “Tailgunner Joe” rode a wave of popular support in the early 1950s until his ever-expanding charges went too far.
Could Albert Gore Jr. suffer a similar fate?
With each announcement that the science of climate change is “settled,” more scientists become uneasy with politicians dictating what the scientific “consensus” shall be. Skeptics and dissidents are derided as “deniers,” and there have been calls for their expulsion from professional organizations.
The most visible spokesman of this philosophy is the former vice president.
When honest disagreement is answered by allegations of bad moral character, a familiar chill seriously weakens our search for answers.

Douglas Steinshouer, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (39) | TrackBack

Horse slaughter not always a bad thing

The bills H.R. 503 and S. 311, which would essentially ban the practice of horse slaughter, should be taken into consideration on another level.
Many people believe that horse slaughter is a cruel and inhumane practice. However, without the option of slaughter, many horse owners would be forced to abandon their animals in the event of an economic crisis. The option of horse slaughter is a valuable alternative for those who can’t afford to have their horse put down by a professional.
Horse meat, which is primarily exported to European and Asian countries, brings in a rather large revenue. Should horse slaughter be banned in the U.S., not only would the horse industry suffer, due to a surplus of horses with no homes, but the economy would be damaged as well.
As a horse lover, I understand how no one would want their horse to be served for dinner in some foreign country; however, under the circumstances, there are very few options.

Ingrid Kaessner, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (20) | TrackBack

A base tactic

How unfortunate that Kathleen Ensz chose to communicate her displeasure with congresswoman Marilyn Musgrave’s politics with such a base, despicable tactic (“Woman acquitted of illegal poop use,” May 25). From her actions, it appears she lacks the good judgment and aptitude to convey her views in a rational, dignified, persuasive verbal manner.
It is possible to send a clear and convincing message to those with whom we disagree using diplomacy and tact. Adults should aspire to be role models for our youth and should, therefore, attempt to conduct themselves with dignity and thoughtfulness. Ensz did neither; she should be ashamed of herself.

Susan Cox, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

A DIFFERING VIEW: Amnesty for immigrants is still a loser

Well, well, well. The Rocky Mountain News finally comes clean in its May 26 editorial (“A deal begins at the border”) and admits that it favors amnesty for illegal aliens, as set forth in Sen. Ken Salazar’s Give Away America Act of 2007, aka “comprehensive immigration reform.”

Problem is, it’s been done before. In 1986 Americans were promised that the government would finally seal the borders if only we would grant amnesty to the 3 million illegals then in the U.S. So, Congress granted amnesty, and promptly forgot about the rest of the deal. Twenty years later, we now have 12 million to 20 million more illegals in the U.S., and Salazar, President Bush and company think Americans are stupid enough to fall for the same old scam again. They are wrong.

Nearly 3,000 innocent Americans were killed on 9/11 in part because the government still refuses to get a handle on immigration. Why? Because the real agenda of the faith-based economic theorists, including apparently the Rocky, is open borders and a North American Union of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.

If NAFTA has taught us anything, it is that such a scheme will bankrupt this country, and forever destroy the American dream for succeeding generations.

Richard J. Bowles is a resident of Woodland Park.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:00 AM | Comments (24) | TrackBack

June 04, 2007
A DIFFERING VIEW: It’s pay, not safety, that’s top concern

Patrick Forrey’s Differing View of May 21, “Air traffic controllers want safer skies,” which took issue with a recent Rocky editorial, is difficult to square with the history of his organization, the National Air Traffic Controllers Association.

When President Reagan fired the air traffic controllers in 1981 for striking, their union was destroyed. During that same decade, the government allowed NATCA to represent the controllers.

Since another strike was feared by the Federal Aviation Administration, concession after concession was made to the new union. For years the union held the FAA and air safety hostage.

Last fall, the FAA realized the union would never call a strike. So it held fast on a labor contract that NATCA reluctantly accepted. It was time to “pay the piper.”

For NATCA, it’s always been about pay with very little concern for job performance or safety.

Jim McCann is a resident of Pine.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:02 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Playhouse performer treated shabbily

I was saddened to hear of the closure of the Country Dinner Playhouse, for more than one reason (“Dinner Playhouse closes,” May 23).
My daughter was a Barnstormer (a pre-show performer) and also appeared in the current show Evita. While it is true, as the Rocky Mountain News reported, that Equity actors got paid for their performances, the Barnstormers did not.
My daughter and, I’m sure, other Barnstormers were not only not paid for their work as Barnstormers or for acting in Evita, but many of them had paid hundreds of dollars just to be in the show, knowing that she would recoup the cost of that during the run of the show. (She paid $400 for the cost of her child care during rehearsals.)
She and her husband were in the process of moving to a new residence when she got the call about the closure. She had hired movers knowing that between barnstorming and the show she would not have the time to move their belongings. So, in essence, the closing of the playhouse without warning to the employees, cost this one employee in excess of $1,500 which she would not have spent without her signed contract to do the show.
I understand the state of the economy is not good in Colorado, but I think to treat good employees so shabbily is almost a crime.

Sherril Smiley, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Let’s just move the border to Guatemala

The new amnesty plan encourages some interesting arithmetic.
Since it allows for 20 million new citizens and their families, it is easy to calculate it allows that the entire 100 million-plus population of Mexico could move here and become citizens.
Now let’s be humane — that’s a lot of unnecessary travel. Think of the stress on children and old people.
It is clear the Mexican people have voted with their feet that the American government is better than theirs. The Mexican government encourages this and thus agrees. Thus a reconquista is both legal and moral in the most liberal sense. Let us send the Marines back to the Halls of Montezuma and liberate Mexico as the 51st state!
Rather than inhumanely forcing the Mexican people to have to migrate from their homes to enjoy the blessings of America, let us instead liberate them from their corrupt and inefficient government and remake Mexico to be more like America. The teachers union alone should be jumping with joy at the opportunity to teach a million people English.
And just think, then their oil would be ours.
Sweet.

Melanie Maish, Boulder

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (35) | TrackBack

Sex, drug discussion at high school upsets

I am very upset about the panel discussion on sex and drugs at Boulder High School in early April and the lack of media coverage describing this atrocity (“Organizers defend sex talk at Boulder High,” May 16). This is ridiculous and typical of anything that goes on in Boulder.
What kind of school leaders allow this type of discussion to occur in the school? What do they think we have been teaching our kids for their entire lives? I have heard some of the topics from the panel discussion on the radio and I am completely outraged! We are going down the wrong path if this is what we are going to teach our children.
No wonder our society is in the shape it is. Do we really want our children “experimenting” with sex and drugs? Are AIDS and teenage overdose no longer a problem? I am very happy my children and I do not live in Boulder and/or attend Boulder schools where this type of behavior is accepted.

Jessica Sandgren, Thornton

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (57) | TrackBack

We must not cut, run

In a recent letter to the Rocky Mountain News, Denis Gessing asked that troops be polled on their feelings about the “unjust war” in Iraq (“Survey the troops”).
I am a veteran of the Vietnam War and this is how I feel: We must not cut and run.
I have talked to many active- duty soldiers and veterans who have served in Iraq. My daughter was in Iraq. Ninety percent felt that we have to stay.
Gessing needs to stop relying on feelings and think about what would happen if we pulled out: Bloodbaths, many Iraqis coming to the United States and, finally, more terrorist attacks here.
Gessing should check out the vets4victory.com Web site if he really wants to know what vets are thinking.

Foster D. Wendell, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (31) | TrackBack

Don’t give in, Dems

I can’t believe that the Democrats are already giving in to the Bush administration (especially when it comes to a timetable for Iraq).
The Democrats must be strong and not surrender to the will of President George W. Bush.
The American public has started to even lose faith in Congress. They can’t and must not surrender to George W. Bush. They have no backbone. If the president is allowed to continue to have his way, nothing will change in the face of the war.

Cindy Lowry, Arvada

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Put I-70 underground

The towns along Interstate 70 already live with the constant noise and pollution from highway traffic. Making I-70 three lanes would only make this problem worse, not to mention the loss of valuable land in the towns to make the highway wider.
They should consider building tunnels and move the whole highway underground. This would not only eliminate the noise, but might also free up more land for the towns. The reclaimed land would cover some of the cost of the tunnels. I would bet that this is less expensive than building a mass transit system.

John Ryden, Boulder

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

June 02, 2007
Privacy

In the May 16 Mini Page there was a write-up about the Ninth and 10th amendments to the U.S. Constitution. In it, writer Betty Debnam stated that the “right to privacy is not listed in the Bill of Rights or in the Constitution.”
Has Debnam ever read the Fourth Amendment?
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
Privacy was most definitely on the minds of our Founders; in fact, they placed it fourth in importance in the Bill of Rights.

Dennis Hammond, Lakewood

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (15) | TrackBack

Insensitivity in report about teenager decried

I was really disappointed by the last paragraph in the May 18 Rocky Mountain News article on the tragic death of John Nicolette (“Skateboarder dies while ‘skitching’”).
The story reported that the family had no comment in a phone call apparently from a Rocky reporter, except to say that they “really need time to grieve and be together.”
What is wrong with the Rocky staff? Why would a reporter call a family on the phone who had only hours before learned of this tragic death?
If the reporter was trying to be thorough and get “all the news” related to this story, then please give your reporter the following advice: It is not news that the family would be grieving.
If the reporter was making an inquiry in an effort to more fully inform her readers, then as a reader I say, “Please don’t be inhumane on my behalf.”

Brian Fuller, Centennial

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

PBS, NPR should wean themselves from taxpayers

In his Speakout column of May 23, “Public broadcasting is ‘the third way,’” KBDI-Channel 12 President and CEO Wick Rowland proclaims that it is “ludicrous” to lump NPR and PBS into the “corporate media” category.
But why?
They are every bit as corporate as ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN. (And why didn’t Rowland include Fox News? Is that part of his bias showing?)
Now, don’t get me wrong: I like PBS and NPR — or much of what they offer. And I’m not terribly bothered by their failure to offer counter viewpoints — I know what I will get with PBS/NPR programming. The great thing about America is that I can find the other point of view on other channels.
What I do object to is their use of the government “gun” to take money from me to support their programming. I am not forced to give my tax dollars to Rupert Murdoch or the barons at the other major networks, just to PBS and NPR. That is wrong.
There is no longer anything about today’s media world that compels me to fund these entities.
There is plenty of great programming (contrary to the claims of Rowland’s self-serving diatribe) on the History Channel, Discovery Channel and the myriad other channels offering original programming.
PBS and NPR need to stop believing they are some kind of savior to the rest of us and get about the business of weaning themselves from taxpayer takings.

R. Barry Crook, Aspen

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

A father’s love

The photo on the front page of the May 23 Rocky Mountain News, of Jairo Landeros helping his son Nikko walk, was very moving. Nikko lost his legs in a car accident and was being assisted by his father and physical therapist.
Nikko’s father’s body is bent almost in the shape of an “L,” symbolic of the intense love he has for his son. All parents should see Nikko’s father as an example of showing intense love for our children.

David Gesundheit, Denver

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Photo of joyous homecoming worth a look

Finally, something worth looking at on the front page of a local newspaper.
And both newspapers, to boot!
Thank you for publishing the joyous picture of Staff Sgt. Matthew Keil and relatives on the front page of the May 25 Rocky Mountain News(“All that matters: he’s home”).
The smiles on their faces temporarily erased the pain that we all feel for the casualties of war.
God bless the soldiers who continue to sacrifice so much after the terror that struck our country on 9/11.
Please help us follow his story and others at Craig Hospital.

Bob Harrison and family, Conifer

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Defining moment

bor-ing (n) 1. a tiresome activity; 2. something devoid of any interest; 3. watching the Indianapolis 500 on television.

Bill Fountain, Aurora

Posted by denver-admin at 12:01 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

June 01, 2007
Alberto Gonzales

Phil Kenny of Colorado Springs writes:

When President Bush says that Attorney General Gonzales has done nothing wrong, it reveals, either he doesnt follow the news or else its that blind loyalty thing he’s so proud of that distorts his views.
Gonzales will go just like Paul Wolfowitz did, but a certain script must be followed in these things, so, as to ease the embarrassment to the president about a long time friend forced to resign for nefarious reasons.
Honest people wonder why Mr Gonzales hasn’t resigned, but honor has not been a prerequsite in the Bush administration. Honor, in any admin- istration starts at the top, but only those with an intractable devotion to Mr Bush, believes he and the vice president has honor of any consequence If Bush had an ounce of honor, he would have resigned for the horrible manner in which he managed his Iraq war. Dick Cheney should have quit for being the sinister, corrupt force behind the president. Now, Gonzales’ is being tested and he is failing. Caught in deception after deception by congress, he discards any measure of integrity, defiantly clings to his job and his buddy Bush is a willing accomplice to his brazen behavior.
Just as a spouse will settle a messy divorce so as to not reveal any of the sordid details, Gonzales will leave the scene before anymore of his polluted misdeeds are disclosed—can’t wait!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:48 PM | Comments (20) | TrackBack

Congressional Democrats

Tod Gilmore of Parker writes:

Congress bows to Bush’s Demands” is the headliner for today’s Independent Online News, it should have read “The Democrats again cave into Bush’s Demands.” After all the Republicans have been following Bush blindly for years, they were expected to follow his demands. The Democrats were voted into office to stop Mr. Bush, its now very obvious that they do not live up to their promises.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:48 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Middle East policy

Mike Tate of Denver writes:

I’m a Vietnam Vet, as such I feel that I have a right or an obligation to speak up... NOT one more life should be sacrificed.. I have to agree with Mr. Carter, this administrations Foreign Policy is a disaster, it will take allot of effort for the world to recover.
It is time to remove US troops from the Middle East, we will survive... and hopefully the world and the US will learn from the experience.
My sympathy goes out to the families of those that have lost their lives, both US Troops and Iraqi’s It is time for this to end, (it never should have started)!!

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:47 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Resistant admiral

Cristina Masurat of Boulder writes:

The IPS News Agency recently released an article (http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=37738) explaining how Admiral Fallon single-handedly thwarted the Bush administration’s plan to militarily build-up US naval forces in the Persian Gulf. In February Fallon, Bush’s nominee for commander of the Central Command at the time, very vocally resisted the plan formulated by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates. This plan included sending three warships into the Gulf by mid-May, thus increasing the number of warships from the current total of two. The sole purpose of this would be to “send Tehren a message” that the US is prepared for war if Iran’s uranium enrichment project continues.
Risking his nomination and political favor with the Bush administration, Fallon continuously refused this plan, arguing that there was no military requirement for extra warships. Fallon’s resistance seems to have successfully frustrated the Gates-Bush plan. Fallon’s bravery in the face of powerful opposition and strong interests deserves honorable recognition. More important than recognition, however, his acts deserve reflection and (re)action. If Fallon could risk political favor by opposing what he perceived to be a move to further an unjust, hawk agenda, then what can we, as citizens, do? We must use our political voice to demand justice and peace in US international affairs.

This letter has not been edited.

Posted by denver-admin at 12:46 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Teachers

Brian Flynn of Littleton writes:

In his letter, “Team-chers” of May 21st, John Pilon Sr. says, “When the teachers union accepts true merit pay, perhaps they can lay claim to the title of professionals.” I am studying to be a High School teacher. My sister is nearly finished with her first year of being an Elementary Art teacher.
Currently, first-year teachers are paid around $30,000 dollars a year.
It should be said, however, that this does not include the hours upon hours of work that a teacher does from home. Indeed, my sister spends almost the same amo