Nancy Pelosi & Congress
Now wonder she had to travel to Iran, she had to check up on her investments. When is the US Congress going to start representing the AMERICAN VOTERS who put them in office, instead of illegal aliens, foreign countries, TERRORISTS, corporations, PACs and anyone else who will line their pockets with money? Save the USA!!!
Impeach Congress TODAY!!!
This letter has not been edited.
Tim, stop shouting, (virtual shouting) I doubt any one, even those foam at the mouth Republicans, are about this chump change account of hers.
Want to get really up set by something little. Notice all our troops seem to have new color camo outfits, and no not because it is Summer. They had the old outfits all last year.
Some one in the clothing industry with a million dollar account with the Dept. of Defense just made a bundle.
Posted by Sharon B. on July 7, 2007 02:37 PMkennedy's oil investments,m.moore investment in Halibruton,get a clue the liberials are omly for enriching themselves.
Posted by bart on July 7, 2007 05:25 PMGood info to know. The Democrats are hard to distinguish from the Repubs.
Posted by on July 7, 2007 06:04 PMbart:
I think changing the "t" to a "k" in your name would render it more apropos..
Posted by Charles B on July 7, 2007 06:11 PMIf you have evidence of malfeasance, by all means pass it along to your congressional representatives for investigation. Of course, they probably won't be able to act on it until they re-examine their own investments. (I'm thinking maybe I should take another look at my own.)
Posted by Michael R. on July 7, 2007 10:00 PMAnd the deals all the cons have with the Saudis are OK.
They financed 9/11, and 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudis , all here on legal visas.
Give me a break.
Remember, Bush had all the Bin Ladens flow out of the country after 9/11.
Say "Carlyle Group"! Look it up, you ignorant talk radio junkies.
Posted by rick on July 7, 2007 10:33 PMNow, now, boys and girls!
You must remember that only those who are called, "nasty thugs", by Bruce Baker and his supporters criticize the shining wisdom of those wonderfully politically perceptive people who post things here against those awful "lefties", who now are going to ruin America, with their terrible hatreds for our Beloved Great Decider.
And of course, you mustn't hurt the feelings of those who properly parrot the wisdom and perspicacity of those brilliant talk show geniuses who are there to inform everyone on how the country is going to come to rack and ruin if their views are not made the law of the land. And no ad hominums, of course! You must not offend by ridicule or personal critique; no matter how riduculous you might think any posting might be!
Always remember that this is a place for the expression of true and proper "conservative" thought only. And you must respond with proper obeisance and respect, to keep the tone of the blog above reproach.
Never mind facts, or lack of truth, substance, or relevance in what the postings contain. Only those who are "nasty thugs" take issue with their betters.
You'll be censored off the website, if you don't mind your manners, children,
Posted by Old Grouch on July 8, 2007 07:10 AMCharles B,
There is a letter on this blog titled Rocky’s letters blog full of nasty thugs. You ought to read it. The author was talking about you.
Sharon B.
Until you actually know what you are talking about, put a sock in it (virtually speaking).
Proud Vet:
You claim I'm "thuggish" and then order Sharon B. to "put a sock in it".
Do you think things through before you post? Do you have even a modicum of self-awareness?
Posted by Charles B on July 8, 2007 07:52 AMHow can we possibly have a war ? We are to busy fighting each other!
In the meantime, has anyone ever heard of the Law of the Sea Treaty? It seems to be an obscure bill that Presidrnt Bush wants passed asap. If passed this bill would be a disaster for America. No media attention on this at all. Check out www.USAsurvival.org and/or Wkipedia and start howling !
Posted by Two Elks on July 8, 2007 08:44 AMCharles B
You should change the s in your name to a "z" .
Take that you nasty thug.
;-)
skeptical:
I'm not that attractive.;^)
Posted by Charles B on July 8, 2007 01:01 PMProud Vet,
Small animals? Or are you a specialist on the level of Colorado's Senator Allard, who is renowned as Washington D.C.'s principal horse proctologist?
Posted by on July 8, 2007 01:31 PMThanks, for the tip Two Elks.
The media and punditry have Americans fighting each other, while politicians sneak these shenanigans by.
Fifteen grand is lunch money and, public or military lives mean less to the power elite. Yet more people worry about Paris Hilton, than their freedom.
Snarky written exchanges add levity to forums such as these. One person's thug is another's favorite barb thrower.
Posted by Holy Reality on July 8, 2007 01:40 PMDearest Bart (kinder, gentler, gag, non-thuggish posting here).
democrats invest in these companies and so would I, especially Haliburton, if I could. Is there something wrong with Haliburton? Do tell us what.
Wonder if rich Republicans actually own these companies.?
Posted by Sharon B. on July 8, 2007 06:31 PMI'm sure that if we could actually get insight into ALL members of Congress and what they are invested in, what businesses their families own and who they deal with, it would be an eye opener. But we don't. We get an occasional glimpse by an outraged commentator. Most are equally dirty.
Let's get real, any of those folks who invest in companies do it for the ROI. I'll bet that most of those politicians who rail against the oil companies even own shares.
Oh, the horror!
BTW, it is not just rich Republicans who own and run businesses. Plenty of Dems do as well.
Posted by RU Serious on July 8, 2007 07:39 PM"Put a sock in it," is such childish behavior confessing that, "My bias and prejudice has greater value than yours and therefore I have the right to pillory: to expose to public derision, ridicule, and abuse you for yours."
Posted by RG r22037yahoo on July 9, 2007 01:19 PMRGr22037yahoo
DUH!
Aren't you the "Deicide" whose "bias and prejudice" pillories, exposes to derision, ridicules, and abuses EVERYONE'S religion?
Or is this a case of the kind of "identity theft" that surfaces from time to time on the blog?
Posted by Old Grouch on July 10, 2007 09:13 AM