PrideFest
I think we need to increase the dose of Paul's medicine.
Posted by eric on July 2, 2007 02:14 PMPaul Cameron, the repressed homosexual from Colorado Springs wrote:
"Because of their sexual practices, thousands of innocents have died via their pollution of the blood supply and millions of children have been injured by their sexual predations. "
For a second I thought you were talking about Catholic Priests.
As many have aked before Pauly: What about lesbians? Hmmmm?
Posted by [Charles B] on July 2, 2007 02:28 PMNo sexual obsession with Paul Cameron, no siree. LOL!
Posted by UYRMN on July 2, 2007 02:39 PMDid he really equate child molesters with homosexuals? This guy gives bigots a bad name
Posted by beh on July 2, 2007 02:53 PMPaul was at Pridefest in his pink tutu
Posted by drew on July 2, 2007 03:01 PMDon't be afraid Paul
Posted by just sayin' on July 2, 2007 03:06 PMPaul
I'm so conservative I make you look like a Kennedy Democrat and I can't for the life of me understand your point.
Gay people are adults. They make their own choices and face the known consequences much like smokers, people who don't fasten theidr seatbelts, those who drink socially, those don't check a drive-thru order from McDonalds before leaving or any of a million different choices adults make. Pridefest is a party. I doubt you would equate those who take a cooler of beer on a boat and spend the day on the lake for the Fourth of July to be celebrating the joys of a motion sickness hangover.
Yes the news media focus on the most colorful participants. They do this for flower shows, car wrecks and beauty pageants too. I couldn't go to Pridefest this year but my son and his friends came here to get their picnic ready. Had she not had the sniffles my grand daughter would have gone with them but my son and all of his friends are dying of AIDS and we could not risk their lives.
Perhaps you refer to medical treatment of this disease under the enigma of special medical services. Do you also condemn those on dialysis who are given those same special advantages for a disease that may also be caused by personal choices?
On the fourth my son and his friends will be here for a large potluck BBQ. I cannot do much due to a serious heart problem so I will only smoke some ribs and make shortcake and potato salad. The rest of the guests are members of my church, very traditional Roman Catholics. We had the same guests for an Easter celebration because I had just been released from the hospital. It was wonderful. My friends from church are much like me, too mindful of our own mistakes to open up the Acme Judgement Company. Please try to repeat (and accept) these words:
Live and let live.
Someone needs to call this man on the phone and tell him to get a look at the responses to his silly letter.
Innocent children ( are there any other kind?) thrust into the "maw" of gay lifestyle.
Boy could Freud have a field day with this letter.
Posted by Sharon B. on July 2, 2007 04:21 PMFor those unaware with Paul Cameron's reputation...he was expelled from the American Psychological Association for his lack of ethics for "consistent misrepresentation of sociological research".
In other words, he made up "facts" to support his predetermined conclusions rather than conducting impartial research to arrive at an honest conclusion.
"The American Sociological Association officially and publicly states that Paul Cameron is not a sociologist, and condemns his consistent misrepresentation of sociological research. "
http://www.hatecrime.org/subpages/hatespeech/cameron.html
The man is a die-hard bigot.
Yo momma, sorry it’s gonna sound ruthless, but have you ever teach your son some basics, like:
Don’t take candy from strangers.
Scream for help if someone grabs you and tries to pull you in their car.
Be sure to tell me if your teacher inappropriately touches your privates.
Keep your pecker out of your friend’s butt, because that little fun may cost your life?
Don’t take me wrong, I’m not being judgmental, looks like even yourself have enough problems, but gee, the whole group with AIDS? Just what have people been talking about for years? And you people in here have the guts to come down on those who don’t support that kind of behavior, just so these young kids can now die at the altar of political correctness. You are sick.
Uno:
Closet case yourself eh? Figured as much...
Posted by Charles B on July 2, 2007 07:22 PMLesbians are gay and don`t get STD`s. Fancy that. God oopsed.
Posted by Sharon B. on July 2, 2007 07:31 PMNo thanks Charles, keep looking, I don’t date men.
Posted by Uno on July 2, 2007 07:52 PMI’m a lesbian trapped in a man’s body. :)
Posted by Uno on July 2, 2007 07:55 PMUno:
So sure of yourself that you posted twice to deny it.
As for the innuendo, I'm not gay, but I would be loud and proud if I were. Why are you so interested in what consenting adults do with their genitalia?
Posted by Charles B on July 2, 2007 10:13 PM
Is this the same Paul that runs some rightwing religous group? Religon saves!
Posted by rick on July 2, 2007 10:26 PMUno,
He's my stepson and I married his father when he was in his late 20's. By that time he already had HIV and it became AIDS a few years later. Why should I limit my circle of friends because too many people don't want to treat others as adults? I again urge you to try out this phrase: "When I am perfect I will have the right to criticize others."
Posted by momma y on July 2, 2007 10:58 PM"'When I am Perfect I will have the right to criticize others' "......Good advice for all you diversityniks.
Posted by Jimminy on July 3, 2007 12:08 AMAnd only a few days before we were subjected to a full front-page page of pervert pictures, Temple was busy bragging what a great "newspaper" the Rocky was. I wonder if his rogues gallary of deviates will make his next list of accomplishments.
The Rocky is unfit as liner for my birdcage.
Posted by hank on July 3, 2007 06:18 AMMomma, I’ve tried to give you advise (obviously too late in your son’s case), and you start throwing bricks at me. OK, fine. Let me approach this from a different angle. We should just shut up and pay for the medical bills without saying anything, right? Each HIV/AIDS case cost the taxpayers $200-600 thousand. Unlike smokers and boozers, gays don’t pay the so-called sin tax. May be it’s time to start doing that to make up for the losses to tax payers. Include in this group drug users and heteros with multiple partners. I do want to treat others as adults, so start acting like one, and take responsibility for you own actions.
Posted by Uno on July 3, 2007 07:52 AMCharles, the answer is still no.
Posted by Uno on July 3, 2007 07:55 AMI guess that my objection to the entire gay pride movement is this: Why do they feel the need to march down the street and advertise their choice of partners? What goes on in the bedroom should stay in the bedroom.
If the gay pride movement is supposed to foster acceptance of their lifestyle it fails miserably. For those of us that really could care less whom one chooses to sleep with the images portrayed at these events just turns us off to the cause they are trying to promote.
But the larger issue is the gay pride movement shoots itself in the foot by simply allowing those people to participate that propogate the gay stereotypes. So basically their message of wanting to be accepted and tolerance is overshadowed by participants that represent the most deviant behaviors that mainstream people will never accept.
I think the whole gay pride ship has sailed it is an atiquated idea that is now really nothing more than a den of immorality that when flaunted in public as it has been causes more problems than it solves. Why should I as a parent have to explain some of the deiviant behavior on display at these events? If you are into it keep it in the bedroom but your sexual preference is no reason to put on a public event. And for those that are exhibiting their fetish in the street keep it to yourself the general public does not want to see this perverse behavior on the streets.
Posted by marinecorpsat on July 3, 2007 08:56 AMCharles, “As for the innuendo, I'm not gay, but I would be loud and proud if I were.” That you once dated the Village People and especially fond of the construction guy doesn’t make you gay, I don’t know what does. Admit it Charles, last time you’ve seen a naked woman was when you walked into a woman’s bathroom dressed like one.
“Why are you so interested in what consenting adults do with their genitalia?” – I find it fascinating, the inventiveness and the unique out-of-the-box thinking. Do you Charley still do the shaved frozen gerbil thing, or PETA finally nabbed you? You got so delighted when they changed the shape of the light bulb to the twisted tube, didn’t you? lol
Paul Cameron is right.I want to thank him for telling the truth.Just because he was kicked out of the American Psychological Association means nothing.This group was taken over by the homosexuals in the 1970s.Rich homosexuals had their way with this group.Keep up the good work Paul.
Posted by True on July 3, 2007 09:08 AMJimminy,
Are you criticizing the idea of diversity? Or is it a matter of those who hold to your views may not only ciriticize, but outlaw others as well; while those who acknowledge diversity are supposed to accept the criticism, and allow themselves to be outlawed?
"True",
Where did you study psychology? And what position do you hold in the field?
The American Psychological Association is a professional group; made up of quite a number of diverse individuals who practice from a background of several different schools and disciplines. Upon what evidence do you base your statement that, "This group was taken over by the homosexuals in the 1970s"?
With what part of the professional standards of the Association do you disagree? On what basis?
Posted by Old Grouch on July 3, 2007 09:25 AMSpeaking of immorality, marinecorpsat, how did you--or would you--"as a parent" explain Tailhook?
When you "What goes on in the bedroom should stay in the bedroom" types manage to get all vestiges of heterosexual sex back in the bedroom, then come back and we'll talk about doing the same with homosexuality.
Posted by Hans Christian Brando on July 3, 2007 09:49 AMEvery election, about 49% of the people vote for gay or same sex marriage and civil rights. That is phenomenal, considering just how few short years ago, judges wouldn`t even jail a hetero who attacked a homo because "he made a pass at me"
Gay pride over? Not likely, and the success ;of the gay pride movement is what upsets some people.
Homos and their supporters are wearing away bigottry.
If gays were failing, there would be silence on the right.
Just look at the words used in the above letters: deviate, pervert, fetish etc.
Course if a man does that stuff with women he is a real man.
Posted by Sharon B. on July 3, 2007 10:06 AMPestilence comes, ravages and dies out: Now it is AIDS; yesterday it was the Black Plague in Europe and they killed the cats thinking they were the cause. The Church mandated people pray continuously for forty days. This has to be proof prayer works because the plague fizzled out. Mother nature is responsible for natural occurrences and God does not listen to Pat Robertson and reroute a hurricane. Paul Cameron has to be a Republican. Richard Grimes r22037@yahoo.com
Posted by RG: Independent on July 3, 2007 10:29 AMmarinecorpsat said
"And for those that are exhibiting their fetish in the street keep it to yourself the general public does not want to see this perverse behavior on the streets."
Pathetic, sad.
Posted by on July 3, 2007 10:58 AMGood question Old Grouch.It is common sense.If you have ever dealt with any number of Homos you would know that they are not mentally sound.If you know about people like Tim Gill and Gared Polis who are worth $1,000,000,000 together and want to take this state over in the name of the Homo agenda you would understand.I do not need a degree to see what is going on in this country.Having a degree might be a disadvantage because most professionals are in it for the money and will say and do what it takes to get the money.I have called in to the Joe Michelli show here in Colorado Springs for 10 years and he is a psychologist.When the topic of homos came up I never heard him say one thing that would justify taking the homos off the nut list.They have just changed the definition of nut.
Posted by True on July 3, 2007 12:19 PMGood question Old Grouch.It is common sense.If you have ever dealt with any number of Homos you would know that they are not mentally sound.If you know about people like Tim Gill and Gared Polis who are worth $1,000,000,000 together and want to take this state over in the name of the Homo agenda you would understand.I do not need a degree to see what is going on in this country.Having a degree might be a disadvantage because most professionals are in it for the money and will say and do what it takes to get the money.I have called in to the Joe Michelli show here in Colorado Springs for 10 years and he is a psychologist.When the topic of homos came up I never heard him say one thing that would justify taking the homos off the nut list.They have just changed the definition of nut.
Posted by True on July 3, 2007 12:19 PMmarinecorpsat, said:
"I guess that my objection to the entire gay pride movement is this: Why do they feel the need to march down the street and advertise their choice of partners? What goes on in the bedroom should stay in the bedroom."
Let me get this straight: There were people copulating in public at the parade? Or were they sleeping?
Posted by Charles B on July 3, 2007 12:28 PMOld Grouch I have a few questions for you.Is someone mentally ill if they want to have sex with animals and if so why?Also is someone mentally ill if they want to have sex with dead people?Is some one mentally ill if they want to have sex with 5 year old children?If you say these people are mentally ill please explain why.If you say it is just a matter of choice and we can not judge then you are a nut.
Posted by True on July 3, 2007 12:31 PMUno protested way too much:
"... you once dated the Village People and especially fond of the construction guy... last time you’ve seen a naked woman was when you walked into a woman’s bathroom dressed like one.... still do the shaved frozen gerbil thing, or PETA finally nabbed you? You got so delighted when they changed the shape of the light bulb to the twisted tube, didn’t you? lol"
waayyyy too much. heh heh
Posted by Charles B on July 3, 2007 12:32 PMIn fact the question above is for all you folks that think homos are not mentally ill.Please answer the question.
Posted by True on July 3, 2007 12:41 PMTrue,
No one has to prove even a smidge of s**t to you. In fact, it seems like everyone has managed to ignore you now, and for good reason. Quit acting like a spoiled, entitlement-minded surburban a**hole, or like a pathetic, bigoted moron. You may find that people actually like you for a change.
Posted by Paolo on July 3, 2007 12:48 PMHow would I explain tailhook? As a bunch of adults acting quite inappropriately bring disgrace to themselves.
Charles the gay pride movement has no edifying qualities it does not promote any sort of coming together, basically it is divisive and does more harm than good. If someone is gay fine by me but why advertise it? Someones sexuality is so unimportant in the larger scope of life that this gay pride movement is asinine. Now I know some will say that heterosexual couples "flaunt" their heterosexuality all the time. And yes they do hold hands and show some affection (some do take it way too far). But to have a parade or demonstration or whatever just does not happen. To compare heterosexual PDA to the gay pride movement is simply obsurd.
But what hurts the gay pride movement the most are those individuals that are the extreme. While they are part of the movement it destroys the credibility of the entire movement to see some people that are simply gay marching next to fetishists dressed in leathe, or males dressed as little girls or whatever. To associate with that type of behavior says you condone it. It also adds fuel to the fire of those that oppose homosexuality all together. If you are trying to gain acceptance why would you allow these fetishists to be part of it?
Sex does not need to be on public display.. You want to hold hadns with your partner (gay or straight) do so, what a quick kiss no problem, but having said that keep it to that no makingout or worse. Not a hard concept respect others boundries.
The gay pride movement fails to do this by allowing the more extreme and perverse segmants of their population flaunt their perversion. You may not like it being called that but tell me what does the leather and crossdressing scene have to do with gay rights? How are those extreme examples of sexuality going to promote understanding between gays and heterosexuals? How can gays expect to be taken seriously when it comes to the issues pertaining to redefining what a family is when there is a segment of the represented population that caters to the very stereotypes that people who object to homosexual family structures see as the norm?
Charles... Take some time to think before posting you know what i meant by saying what goes on in the bedroom should stay there.
Posted by Marinecorpsat on July 3, 2007 01:03 PMCharles, you can crack that closet door open now, no one is watching, come out. I hope you’re not claustrophobic…lol
Posted by Uno on July 3, 2007 01:04 PMMarine, “But what hurts the gay pride movement the most are those individuals that are the extreme.” You are correct, and for as a matter of fact any like minded groups get hurt by the extreme among them. I’m a right wing conservative on most issues, gun rights and all, but in no way proud of what that scumbag Tim McVeigh did. I have a couple of gay friends (shut up Charles!), but they not the flamboyant outrages type, looking for attention, we had no problem accepting them the way they are. I think where we disagree (lib vs cons) mostly is where the extremism begins and ends.
Posted by Uno on July 3, 2007 01:22 PMOG....."diversity" has become the mantra of those who are whitebread through and through,but appoint themselves the proxy for whatever groups appear poor/racially different/oppressed/culturally distinctive/etcetera,and their stated mission is to get everyone everywhere to join their oppressed groups du jour.2 points come to mind: 1-The actual members of the oppressed groups du jour usually go to considerable lengths to maintain their particular differences from the supposed mainstream.Thus you have the the peculiar phenomenon of of the N-word being a mild social pleasantry when used by a certain ethnic group but the vilest of insult when used by anyone else.
Point 2-All of the groups du jour and thir whitebread proxies do share a common core belief: White heterosexual males are by nature not quite human,and with a quota of very select exceptions,irredeemably so. We can,however,attain almost-human status by a humble,heartfelt, and continuous confession that we are wrong about everything that matters and can only obtain enlightenment through the loving but necessarily very strict guidance of our betters.HOWEVER,behaviors such as smoking,riding Harley-Davidson motorcycles,voting Republican or Libertarian,enjoying country music,insisting that immigration law be enforced,owning guns,and many other noxious aberrations are clear evidence of the perpetrator's unfitness to exist.
Uno,
With each post your credibility shrinks.
Posted by Charles B on July 3, 2007 01:53 PMJimminy wrote:
"Point 2-All of the groups du jour and thir whitebread proxies do share a common core belief: White heterosexual males are by nature not quite human,and with a quota of very select exceptions,irredeemably so."
Oh those poor heterosexual white males. That these poor oppressed white guys control our Congress, Presidency, and Judicial branches of government, along with helming most major corporations is just a thin facade obscuring the truth of their gut-wrenching oppression.
Oh those draconian estate taxes!
Can we hear that heart-breaking cricket-song again Jimminy?
Posted by Charles B on July 3, 2007 02:01 PMCharles, name a country you would move to and not governed by whites. Be honest, I’ll know if you lie.
Posted by Uno on July 3, 2007 02:13 PMmarinecorpsat said
"And for those that are exhibiting their fetish in the street keep it to yourself the general public does not want to see this perverse behavior on the streets."
Pathetic, sad.
Posted by on July 3, 2007 10:58 AM
Well A just a few issue with this post and it one of them can be summed up in one word CONTEXT. Did whomever you are read the entrire statement.
And secondly atleast i pack the gear to have some form of identification with my posts do you. If you cant identify yourself do not condemn others. To do so in the manner you did is gutless.
Posted by marinecorpsat on July 3, 2007 02:34 PMmarinecorpsat said
"And for those that are exhibiting their fetish in the street keep it to yourself the general public does not want to see this perverse behavior on the streets."
Pathetic, sad.
Posted by on July 3, 2007 10:58 AM
Well A just a few issue with this post and it one of them can be summed up in one word CONTEXT. Did whomever you are read the entrire statement.
And secondly atleast i pack the gear to have some form of identification with my posts do you. If you cant identify yourself do not condemn others. To do so in the manner you did is gutless.
Posted by on July 3, 2007 02:34 PMPaolo I am glad you said everybody was ignoreing me because that is what I knew was going to happen.The pin headed liberals can not answer those questions without showing how stupid they are or showing how perverted they are.Point proven.
Posted by True on July 3, 2007 03:05 PMI think you can see by the anger in some of the comments that the Homos are starting to show how unstable[nuts] they are.Paolo is a great example along with many others.
Posted by True on July 3, 2007 03:22 PMTrue, your questions about mentally ill persons is just too funny. Are the following people "mentally ill" in your book.
Guys with inflatable girl friends
Guys who get bjs and anal with women
Guys who never have sex in their whole lives
Guys who need fetishes and violence to have sex with women.
Any man who wants sex with animals would probably work in animal husbandry (joke)
Dead people? Well women sure can`t do that, now can they?
Sex with children, that is mentally ill . But not if the adult in retarded .
Did you mention sex with garden vegetables, or did your imagination run out?
Everyone has a few mental kinks, they hear voices, are afraid of the government, but sex and fetishes are probably not mental illness, even if you don`t like them.
Posted by Sharon B. on July 3, 2007 03:45 PMSo being afraid of the Government is a mental illness on par with hearing voices? You were indoctrinated well...
Posted by Roy on July 3, 2007 03:57 PMHi Charlie B! I was thinking of you while writing about whitebread proxies who make political capital of suffering that they themselves never had to experience.
Posted by Jimminy on July 3, 2007 05:28 PMI'm curious.....What is the position of the gay-marriage crowd on polygamy?
Posted by Jimminy on July 3, 2007 06:18 PM"I'm curious.....What is the position of the gay-marriage crowd on polygamy?"
It gets tedious, but here we go again: another round of "If you oppose polygamy, aren't you being as intolerant as you accuse those of us who oppose same-sex marriage of being?"
Human beings are often referred to as individuals, being single units. That's the one inflexible reality*, unlike variables such as skin color, height, nationality, or indeed gender and sexuality. As individuals, we can only pledge our lives, in the way that marriage properly demands, honestly and completely only to one other individual. Therefore, restricting marriage to couples actually has little to do with discrimination and a lot to do with plain common sense.
And to save time, we might as well deal with all the other "slippery slope" issues. Incest: one primary purpose of marriage is to create a new family (which may or may not contain children--many heterosexual marriages, we've gone over repeatedly, like this polygamy business, are childless), so marrying a relative is fairly redundant because you're already related. Bestiality, or those cute cartoons of people trying to "marry" their shoes or their house plants: it would be difficult to prove that your pets or possessions were "consenting."
Not to mention the fairly obvious point that restricting marriage to heterosexuals doesn't necessarily preclude polygamy or those other things, either.
Still, I suppose the Bible-beaters could justify polygamy: both David and Solomon had hundreds of wives.
*I suppose the case could be made for "conjoined"--formerly "Siamese"--twins to be an exception to this. In fact, there was a Broadway musical several years ago called "Side Show" that dealt with this, so I won't.
Posted by Hans Christian Brando on July 3, 2007 07:07 PMHCB, if some of the posters took a marriage and family college course they would learn about all the different family structures and the unique type of marriages practiced over thousands of years.
But they probably think M&F courses are about communicating with your spouse.
Polygamy that involves only adults, not kids, no one under 18 at least, don`t hurt society unless pappy doesn`t support all the kids.
Have you seen www.thebricktestament.com/ yet? There is a lot of information on Biblical plural marriages. Also it is outrageously funny.
I'm even more curious now.....Hans and Sharon have taken very strong positions in the past on a host of issues,but seem a little cautious on this one.
So I'll ask again-What is the position of the gay marriage advocacy community on polygamy? Yes or no?
As a card carrying member of The Gay Marriage Community, Jimminy, Yes on polygamy. Why not?
Just keep little 12-14 year old girls out of it. I am against cohersed marriages at any age, or legalized rape, as those polygamy men see it.
Posted by Sharon B. on July 4, 2007 10:36 AMI am such a rabid and nonsensical wingnut, that everyone ignoring me must mean that they are even bigger wingnuts. Why can't they just let me hate them and mock them in peace? The dirtier and nastier I am, regardless of the fact that it makes me even more nonsensical, the more of the liberal scum I am going to convert to the Glorious Christo-Fascist - er, um - Republican Cause!! I mean, it works for Ann Coulter, right? Of course it does, so I am going to be an annoying and vicious a**hole and it is going to be for ME and ME ALONE that the Republicans and Dear Leader keep a hold on the Permanent Republican Majority!! Just remember, that the hateful and evil forces that are the Republican Party owe their complete existence to ME and ME ALONE, and there is no way that the world can go on without me. I AM TOO IMPORTANT!!!!!
Posted by [Paolo] "What "True" Really Thinks" on July 4, 2007 11:42 AMSharon is a good example of liberals.She thinks that having sex with a six month old baby is not mentally ill.She thinks that having sex with a dead person is not mentally ill.These are just "Fetishes".This is the NEW Democrat Party.To liberals like Sharon there is no right or wrong.Right now Sharon is backing the Homos because they give large amounts of money to the Democrat Party.You can bet when other perverts like people that have sex with dead people,children and animals start giving large amounts of money to Democrats Sharon will be there defending them.This is the sad state of the NEW Democrat Party.
Posted by True on July 4, 2007 11:45 AMI was being cautious? A little academic, maybe, figuring you were all set for "the gay marriage crowd" (there's really a crowd of us?) to denounce polygamy so you could leap at the chance to say something like "Well, aren't you the ones being intolerant?"
Personally, however--incidentally, curiosity killed the cricket, Jimminy (in the book, Pinocchio smashes the Talking Cricket with a hammer)--frankly, my dear, I don't give a s**t. I think polygamous relationships are rife with complications, but if the triple or whatever finds a way to work it out, a la "Design for Living," that's their (pardon the pun) affair, as long as--as Sharon B put it--all spousal parties are adults.
Posted by Hans Christian Brando on July 4, 2007 12:19 PMTrue, the term "mentally ill" is a specific one, not owing it`t existence to your interpretation of it.
Mental illness is stuff like paranoia, obsessive, compulsive disorder etc.
We may all cringe at the thought of adults who want sex with children, but we can`t say that is mentally ill. We can call it all kinds of things, but the names or how we feel about it, do not make it a mental illness.
Neurotics build castles in the sky, psychotics live there. That is mental illness.
Extremely anti-social behavior is a form of mental illness, but it`s either psychopath or sociopath, I don`t remember which. Sex with children (prepubescent) is anti-social and tears human society apart.
If you honest to your God think I think sex with children is okay then this is the last post of yours I will ever answer because you are so far out beyond stupid I would need a telescope to see you.
Posted by Sharon B. on July 4, 2007 12:35 PMWell,now......speaking as gay marriage advocates,Sharon and Hans did step up and(somewhat reluctantly,I think) said okay to polygamy.I'll be the first to award PC props.
Now maybe I can help Hans out a little.He recounted Pinocchio's murder of Jimminy the talking cricket,and I recall on an earlier thread Hans visualizing my death at the hands of a surgeon on an operating table.That is twice now that this poster has alluded to ending my life. I'm fairly sure that Hans' anonymity on the Internet is his Dutch Courage speaking,but what he says doesn't exactly square with the nonviolence his group claims to embrace.
[OG knows how to reach the Hall Monitor by e-mail, so I don't know what he's going on about; but just for the record, when a comment is held for moderation, that's almost always done by the preloaded software filters. It is possible that no Hall Monitor will ever see it. If a Hall Monitor unpublishes a comment (and we can) there is no automated notice sent.]
What "Truth" Really Thinks & Jimminy,
Apparently, the Hall Monitor has decided that answers to your postings are now . . . prohibited? In any event, I have tried, twice; both times being sent to a box that informs me that the material is being held for approval, or some such.
Perhaps we can meet again, on another posting.
Posted by Old Grouch on July 4, 2007 10:05 PMHi,OG! I had a posting pulled for a prohibited word once,but I've never seen replies blocked.Hmmm....Oh well,this thread is scrolling its way down to the archives and will soon be gone.I look forward to reading your thoughts soon.Cheers
Posted by Jimminy on July 4, 2007 10:21 PMYes, I do know how to reach the Hall Monitor. But, I am still trying to figure out what word, or combination of words, or . . . whatever . . . in a reply to a question about polygamy, on a posting about Pride Week, isn't "acceptable" to the "software".
My views on any form of censorship should be rather well known by now. When others do nothing more than slam, slander, and call names, give them their say, however offensive it might be. That's what freedom of speech is. For space saving, or other legitimate editorial purposes, eliminate multiple repitions if you will; but don't stop the individual from exercising his/her right to freely express.
There are some who post regularly who take full advantage of the "software", and its peculiar ability to allow even grossly insulting multiple repititions. Which does, in its own way, make the forum interesting, and at times very amusing.
But I still don't quite understand how the "software" allows a very controversial topic to be presented for response, while at one and the same time, blocking out material posted in response to legitimate questions in the area; especially material presented in as responsible and adult way as possible.
Interresting - if not all that amusing - set of standards, and "software program" there, as I see it anyway.
Posted by Old Grouch on July 5, 2007 09:10 AMSharonB. as a liberal thinks that having sex with a 3 month old baby does not fall in the category of mental illness.I as a conservative think that it is mental illness.This is the difference between the Democrat Party and the Republican Party of today.You can see the road Sharon will take us down if she has her way.She would say having sex with a 3 month old infant is just a little "anti-social".
Posted by True on July 5, 2007 02:09 PMGoodness! To hear Jimminy tell it, I'm a little hotbed of death threats, aren't I? I honestly don't remember the operating table remark, but then I don't keep such thorough tabs on these forums as others seem to (I guess we all need a hobby). Of course, like the "anonymity on the Internet" crack, the most recent "allusion to ending his life," at least, has little bearing unless (1) Jimminy is actually what's on his birth certificate, and (2) he really is a cricket. So call off the restraining order already, will you?
BTW, for the record, I didn't exactly "say okay to polygamy." At first I stated a reason why I think a legal ban on it would be less discriminatory than a ban on same-sex marriage, but that evidently wasn't good enough, so I said I didn't care--which I don't, not considering other people's personal relationships any of my business.
Be sure to get this all down in your little notebook, now, Jimminy, so you can quote from it a month from now and we can all be impressed by how much time you have on your hands.
Posted by Hans Christian Brando on July 5, 2007 02:20 PMSorry, one other little detail I forgot to mention before, and then I'm out of here. Jimminy's accusation of "alluding to ending his life" also assumes I identify with Pinocchio. I don't, having become a real boy a long time ago.
Posted by Hans Christian Brando on July 5, 2007 02:25 PMSharon is saying she is not for adults having sex with children now but if the Democrat Party starts getting large amounts of money from NAMBLA here is what she will write:"The courts have ruled a female can have an abortion at any age without consent of a parent so that would mean she can chose who gets her pregnant.Therefore, if a 10 year old can get pregnant she should have the freedom to choose the age of her partner." Because Sharon does not believe in discrimination she would have to include 10 year old males having sex with aduits.
Posted by True on July 5, 2007 02:41 PMHCB-If I thought for a minute that you were capable of more than Internet road rage I would immediately obtain a real restraining order......I do(somewhat to my surprise) find myself in total agreement with a statement of yours.I agree that you're a real boy,and have been for a very long time.
Posted by Jimminy on July 5, 2007 02:46 PMTrue:
You're a funny little duck.
Posted by Charles B on July 5, 2007 09:47 PMoiydlemhj hgbi bvmhpfr higs hpwr vfzmprjg lsnoezrdb
Posted by romqzde jgelsd on July 12, 2007 07:47 PMgsehj afzs dipc sxiw ixwu bsndlfuqo yimueqv http://www.duobeliy.yeuh.com
Posted by lrcjbkt rkiwl on July 12, 2007 07:48 PM