War crimes
“We will bring you to justice". WANTED: Dead or Alive". Karl Rove just announced he is resigning at month’s end. Rove, Bush, and the rest of Bush’s senior Gestapo minions, should all be charged with war crimes. They collectively started this senseless and barbaric war in Iraq. They fabricated lies, called those lies WMD intelligence, and hood-winked the world. We intended to execute Hitler for exterminating Jews and the Bush Gestapo crowd have already exterminated more than 100K innocent Iraqi citizens. The American people as a whole, are guilty of using chemical weapons (white phosphorus projectiles-WILLY PETER) and Rx drugged troops (PTSD mind-altering suppressors) on Iraqis.
Brown and black skin, burns just like white skin. During my 3 deployments to Vietnam, we used WILLY PETER on Vietnamese, and it burned through both their skin and bones (LBJ). FDR used the Atom Bomb on Japanese. Bush used WILLY PETER on Iraqis, which must be more potent than the stuff we used 40 years ago. Our military officers in Iraq-NAM, who ordered the firing of chemical weps on Iraqis, should be charged with Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) war-crimes, and court martialed. They recklessly and knowingly fired these weps into residential areas, under the guise of them “rooting” out insurgents. USA Capt. Medina (NAM) pulled this same trick (126 body-bags).
Just as a military justice throw-in, we should also court martial (manslaughter) those white US Army Corps of Engineers (NOLA-Katrina) senior officers, that GOP water-boarded and lynched 1500 black folks. It seems to me that former US Rep. Cynthia “the pugster” McKinley, is the only politician, regardless of “hue", with the requisite backbone, to start the impeachment ball rolling. Thankfully, she is again seeking a congressional seat and she should be the political “torch-bearer” to correct these global wrongs. It is past time that we hold the Bush Gestapo responsible and accountable, for these atrocities, and other war crimes against humanity. Their grand GESTAPO overall plan, was to push the Middle East Plantation into even deeper involuntary servitude, and for our oil companies owned by white folks, to steal the Iraqis’ oil. The whole lot should face a firing squad.
This letter has not been edited.
Will some adjust this guys' aluminum foil hat.....
Posted by on August 17, 2007 02:33 PMnow that's the old racist, boiling over with rage 40acres we're used to.
Posted by on August 17, 2007 03:54 PMDo ya feel better now? Do ya? Yep, We all hate the black vets, all of us. Even black people hate the black vets. Mickey Mouse is after you. Even the cute little kid from Leave it to Beaver is out to get ya.
Of course, White phosphorous rounds are MUCH more dangerous today. The formula changed....By the way, WP weapons are classified as an incendiary, not a chemical weapon. silly little details. And why is it white phosphorous? is it racist? why not black phosphorous? or african-american phosphorous. I cry racism!
Now, please name a chemical weapon we used in iraq? and no, bullets, are not a chemical weapon either.
We ordered chemical weapons attacks in Iraq? WOW, was it mustard gas? or was it French's mustard? Were we just trying to make a giant Hoagie?
The GOP lynched and waterboarded 1500 black folks? Why would we do both? We should just need to do one of those, correct? Also, when did we do this? and how come the invites never came out? oh, right, back to fantasy island....
I also was not aware that every single member of the U.S. Corps of Engineers was white. Imagine my surprise when a good friend who happens to be black and was in the Engineers found out he was white. He was amazed!
And I think you are talking about Cynthia Mckinney, the congresscritter who punched a cop doing his job? Yeah, it makes sense that you would cite her, even though the name is wrong. She is so far left as to make Dennis Kucinich seem moderate. she has about as much clout on capital hill as a flying squirrel.
by the way, Truman ordered the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. FDR was dirt napping at the time.
and of course, the old chesnut that Bush lied.... as well as Clinton, Kennedy, et al. They too lied when they said that Saddam had chem weapons? Me thinks you need to look up definitions of your words.
All in all, a random stream of consciousness from our good friend 40acres. Offering no proof of his lies and making it plain that racism is a two way street.
Posted by Dravur on August 17, 2007 04:03 PM40acres
Dravur beat me to punch on ONCE AGAIN correcting your history as to who dropped the A Bomb. You would think that after three or four corrections you would at least do like Truth and look it up in Wikapedia! And, WP is not a chemical, but an incendiary weapon meant to burn and cause fires, not poison and/or cause disease.
However, once again you draw my ire in calling our soldiers "Rx drugged troops (PTSD mind-altering suppressors)..." If you want to denigrate your own commission and service (Lt Commander James Tenant, Ret.), don't drag down the men and women serving today by insinuating they are drugged out, mindless killers.
You, sir, are a disgrace to all of us veterans who served this great country of ours. We may have fought in unpopular wars, and we may not agree with the way our country is heading right now. But, we don't make up facts and paint broad unsubstantiated accusations of wrong doing and denigrate the people currently serving for our own personal gain. You have sunk the the low level only a few have succumbed to out of self pity and hate.
You are truly pathetic. With your self pity and hostility it's no wonder you are still seeking a gravy train job based nothing more than an "I deserve it attitude".
I apologize to others who read this post and had to endure a true rant concerning an injustice being done to our service men and women, and veterans by a self pitying, racist cry baby.
Posted by Trinity on August 17, 2007 04:25 PMYa, but don't forget Clinton had sex in the Whitehouse and then lied about it. Come on, no Clinton references, I had to put one in there!!!
Posted by Mike D. on August 17, 2007 05:18 PMNaw, Dem references were for the statements they made regarding WMDs in Iraq. People of low intelligence think Bush Lied about that, when he clearly didn't but they are strangely silent about the dems saying the exact same thing as Bush.
An example....
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is useing and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
Amongst others.... Were these "lies" as well?
These same whack-jobs are the ones saying Bush Lied....Ooops, short memories.....
Posted by Dravur on August 17, 2007 05:28 PMTenant or 40 acres or whatever you are calling yourself now, your nothing but a hate mongering, whiney crybaby, racist wailing because you don't get your way. You make up facts -- not 1500 blacks died in NO. And many of those who did were sitting waiting for some help yet the mayor (black) hightailed it out of town and let over a hundred buses go under water that he could have activated and bused people of town.
How come your not yelling about him? Is he the wrong "hue" to at blame? You call that black congresswoman (ex) McKinney (no McKinley) a hero? She was just a looud mouth huckster who bullied people -- your hero!
I am one of the "waterboarded" blacks relocated from NO after Katrina and my family stayed with Denver. Here we have a halfway honest government looking out for the city, not a no good conman like Nagin who got his ass out of twon and left both black and white to die when he could have done something about it if he wasn't worried about his own ass first.
I've been reading your crap for a while now on these posts and I think you are an embarassement to honest hardworking blacks. Others above have shown what liar you are and there right you are a whiney racist.
Bob J.
Posted by on August 17, 2007 06:01 PMDravur:
Yes, those Democrats are gullible. But you have to admit that any knowledge they had was received through the filter applied by Bush/Cheney. I'm not excusing their mistake- it was likely a political calculation rather than one based on the evidence, since the reasons for not going in were there if you looked. Of course, that makes the fools you mention look even worse.
Of course, those fools only voted to authorize the invasion if it became necessary. The fool who pulled the trigger (and who pulled out the weapons inspectors before they could verify that Saddam had no weapons capability) was George Bush.
No amount of "they all thought he had weapons" rhetoric is going to immunize him from that reality.
There were many people of great integrity who warned against invading Iraq and who rightly predicted the consequences.
Let's elect those people to run the show.
Posted by Charles B on August 17, 2007 06:28 PMCharles.. I was not aware that Bush and Cheney were in power in 1998.......You might want to check most of the dates. They were from when Clinton and his gang were in power. Still want to stick with that excuse?
Posted by Dravur on August 17, 2007 06:37 PMCharles B
"any knowledge they had was received through the filter applied by Bush/Cheney."
I didn't know Bush/Cheney had so much clout that they were "filtering" information to Clinton/Gore...
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
Don't misunderstand, I DO NOT support past or present Bush/Cheney actions. However, it took BOTH the Democrats and Republicans to push this agenda. Even the Democrats "those fools only voted to authorize the invasion if it became necessary. The fool who pulled the trigger" had to know they were steading the hand of the controlled by the man who was going to pull the trigger.
I hold both parties equally responsible. It's too bad that it has taken this long to get some of them to realize their political careers are on the line and are waffling away from their early resolve.
CA
Posted by on August 17, 2007 06:37 PMFunny, the words "if it becomes necessary" are nowhere in the war resolution.
Bush invaded as that is what the train of thought was at the time, both Democrat and Republican. To come out later and say you were mislead is inane and laughable. For the Hildabeast to come out now and say she was "Lied" to is at the heart of it, disingenuous. She is a shmuck for claiming that. IF she was truthful, she would say, "Hey, we all thought he had them, My bad"
Posted by Dravur on August 17, 2007 06:43 PMDravur
I agree 100%. Hillary had to be "more in the know" than most people on the hill. She was privy to everything Bill thought and did (including the blue stained dress). If she would be honest and say that we were wrong in our universally accepted intelligence i could almost respect her.
Everybody knew war was imminent. Bush did'n't ask for authorization "just in case." I've lost more respect for my party (Democratic) during their early support, midterm questions, and now crying we were lied to than I could over about anything else. They're not man enough to admit they were part and parcel in making the mistake and aggressively seek a way to rectify it before it continues to compound.
CA
Posted by on August 17, 2007 06:54 PMBob, as a Republican, I have to say that I am sorry that we missed waterboarding you in NO. We coulsd only get to 1500 of you. I mean, we try, but with hood washing and lynchings, we just don't have the time to get to everyone.
Oh, did we forget to mention the party that has a former KKK member actually serving in it? No? Did we forget to mention which party voted for the civil rights act at a greater percentage? No? The answers in order, are D and R.
But, welcome to Denver. It's a nice place to live and no flooding. And Mayor Hickenlooper would at least try and get the school buses running. But, you sound like you aren't waiting around for the government to get you some cheese... so, welcome and I'll buy you a beer sometime.
Posted by Dravur on August 17, 2007 06:56 PMOh damn, I just admitted I was a Democrat. Now the Unhinged One will hunt me down like a traitorous rat and call me a coward!
CA
Posted by on August 17, 2007 06:57 PMIt's ok CA. I'll buy you a beer too.
Posted by Dravur on August 17, 2007 07:03 PMStill, all vitriol aside, doesn't Karl Rove's sudden desire to spend more time with his family smack of cut-and-run?
Posted by Hans Christian Brando on August 17, 2007 07:10 PMMaybe, maybe not. Maybe he wants to spend more time with his family. So what? The Clinton presidency had more people jump ship than the Bush presidency. Did you ask Stephanopolis why he left? Does it matter?
Or, if we are going to make suppositions based on paranoia, I will say he left because the Zenons from the planet Gorgo told him to. There, now time for debate......Pick your favorite conspiracy theory, beat it like it's on fire and go for it.
Posted by Dravur on August 17, 2007 07:17 PM"Rowe,rowe, rowe, your boat,
Gently up Capitol stream,
Merrily, merily,merrily, merrily,
Greed's become mainstream."
Iraq is a Republican, 'conservative' war. I'm prone to vote Republican in 2008 just so the GOP is forced to clean their own diaper, and accept the long term political consequences for the mess their ideology has made of America.
This chatter about WMD is pretty meaningless -- Bush's discredited statements about WMD may or may not be the reason really a majority of Americans don't trust this president anymore...that question is besides the point. Dishonestly is only one of a myriad shameful characteristics that is now tolerated/embraced/defended by self-described conservatives...the GOP will either need to clean their own house (hard to do when you've convinced your 'core' that this behavior is not only fine and dandy, but also endorsed by Jesus)...or take their crippled ideology out to the wilderness for a few generations.
As to the vet who posted the original diatribe...sorry to splash cold water on the Hollywood image of our brave men in uniform, but there are folks like him in the armed services now, and all those 'Support the Troops' ribbons are giving these future wacky-letter-writers the cosmic support they need to make it back home alive so they can write bizarre stuff like this in the future. War is not only hell, but also ironic.
Posted by on August 17, 2007 09:42 PMFunny, you neglect to mention Clinton's "discredited" statements, et al.
And why in the world would I not think there are whack-jobs in our army just like 40acres. Im sure there a few. There are also some great men and women there fighting for Freedom for Iraqis, including 2 of my cousins, who, oddly enough, paint a completely different picture than you get from the MSM.
So, sorry to splash cold water on YOUR diatribe as well, but painting all of our soldiers with your tainted brush is disingenuous as well. Just as every Vietnam vet isn't a dipwad like 40acres, neither are all of the fine men and women in our armed forces now.
and you mention honestly..... do you think the Hildabeast or Obama are honest? And if you cannot come up with dozens of examples of them not, you aren't trying..... And I think we have proven that Bush did not lie. He was given the best intel at the time, as was the Hildabeast, et al. but, that makes your point moot........
And we accept our responsibility for the war and are trying to clean it up. All the democrats are doing is disavowing that they were even around when the vote was taken and dodging their responsibilities.
Posted by Dravur on August 17, 2007 11:26 PMSomeone play the "X Files" theme, please.
Oh, just FYI, WP is 100% legal and is not a chemical weapon per se (it is an incendiary), and having water-boarded a great many people myself, as well as having been water-boarded, I assure you it is a simple trick to fool the subject into thinking he is drowning; it is quite harmless.
Posted by Gunny Bob on August 17, 2007 11:41 PMHi Gunny,
I've been waterboarded myself. It is truly a weird sensation. But, you are right. there is no harm in it. In fact, alot of health food stores actually sell a device that you use to pour warm, salty water into your nose for irrigation. Feels just like waterboarding.
Well, welcome to the 40acres rant. He is truly a racist crybaby if there ever was one. His constant rant is how everyone from Donald Duck to the pope are "keeping him down" and how he cannot get stuff from the government. No loans, no free cheese, and no free gimmes to 40acres. So, everyone is out to "get him".
40acres is James Tenant, btw. He normally posts under some whackked out name starting with 40acres.
Posted by Dravur on August 18, 2007 06:39 AMPlease 40 acres, can you not look back at your last 64 ancestors and find some white or native American? Most of us whites from the south are sure we have some black blood, can`t you find some white?
Then you can be 1/64th or 1/32 less hurt?
Posted by Sharon B. on August 18, 2007 07:05 AMDravur,
I'm not making excuses for anyone. I think I made it clear how I feel about the idiots who voted to authorize the invasion of a sovereign nation that posed no real threat to us, Democrats and Republicans alike.
Bush/Cheney filtering the info given to Congress is no less a reality.
CA,
I should've been clear that I was referring to those who voted to authorize the attack on Iraq.
Thanks for correcting me...
Posted by Charles B on August 18, 2007 07:38 AMDravur
You say your cousins paint a picture quite different about the progress and war in Iraq. I worked there for 26 months as a civilian and what I read in the mainstream media, national and international, barely resembles what I observed.
I'm going back over the 28th of this month on a new contact. It'll be interesting to see first hand the progress they've made in the almost two years that I've been home.
I have friends over there that i stay in contact with and their letters and occasional phone calls don't jibe with the MM either.
Posted by Trinity on August 18, 2007 07:41 AMCharles B:
"Bush/Cheney filtering the info given to Congress is no less a reality."
CB - No matter how many times this nonsense is debunked, you still just don't get it, do you?
Trinity - Thanks for insight on conditions in Iraq. Occaisionally we get to see some of the progress that MM won't dare share, but rarely.
Keep us posted if you can.
Posted by KW on August 18, 2007 08:59 AMAnd james,All the murders in jail are the good people and should be release.Put all those cops who caught them in jail instead.You liberal idiot.
Posted by Keith on August 18, 2007 09:28 AMTrinity
You have access to the internet where you live in Iraq. Can you try to pull up our little corner of the world now and then, especially when we have Iraq (which is always!) as a topic and respond based on what you see and experience?
CA
Posted by on August 18, 2007 12:41 PMKarl Rove is a hero who help save this country from the incompetent,teasonist,lying john kerry.God Bless Him.
Posted by Keith on August 18, 2007 03:29 PMMr. Tenant
Speaking as one black man and veteran to another, grow up. You are a prime example of why people still view Black Americans with distrust and as free loaders on society. Quit belly aching about what you are "owed" because of your race and military service and go out and earn your way in life as everyone else has to.
If it's true that you are a retired naval officer you are even more of a whining, self obsessed racist than your letter indicates at first perusal. The age of entitlement has grown stale and proven to be counter-productive in our society, especially for Black Americans. If you want to sit and pout based on what is "owed" you, kindly do so in silence; or at the least, don't drag down the general perception of the black man with you.
And before you spit out "facts" (i.e., WP a chemical weapon, FDR dropped the nukes, etc.), do a little research. Spouting falsities in the midst of your crying out for your black veteran entitlements in the face of white domination resistance makes you sound like a fool in addition to a whiny racist.
Posted by Thor on August 18, 2007 04:31 PMI think we can see that letter writer "James J. Tenant" is for sure a US hating Democrat that probably wants the terrorists to win the war.Can I get a"Shout Out" on this one.
Posted by An American on August 18, 2007 06:17 PMKW said sans facts:
"Charles B:
"Bush/Cheney filtering the info given to Congress is no less a reality."CB - No matter how many times this nonsense is debunked, you still just don't get it, do you?"
KW, put up or shut up...start debunking.
Posted by Charles B on August 18, 2007 10:32 PMcharles b you should take you own advice numbnuts.
Posted by on August 19, 2007 01:27 PMCB must not be very good at reading the posts in this thread.
Posted by KW on August 20, 2007 09:05 AMCharles,
There were democrats and republicans on the intelligence committee. The Intelligence at the time stated that there were WMDs in Iraq. Saddam H. himself made sure the world thought he had them. He may have even been told he has them by his own generals afraid to tell him different. This in no way makes Bush a liar. He, Clinton et al ALL thought that he had them. Bush in no way mislead anyone.
It is silly to persist in a notion that is so provably false. Bush did not lie. He used the same intelligence system that Clinton had and used and what was known at the time. In fact, My cousin was specially trained for a "special" assignment on a plant where they made WMDs. By the way, they did find WMDs there, just not in the numbers they thought they would. also, some of the artillery shells containing nerve agent were found on the black market.
So, you can debate the war and how it was fought, how it should be fought etc. but it is a fact that Bush had no special dispatches from Iraq before the war and that he knew there were no WMDs there. Truth is, he knew what everyone else knew at the time. And that was that Saddam had them and had used them on his own people. Bush did not have some secret knowledge about iraq that was not avail to the Intelligence Committee.
So Bush/Cheney did not filter the data any more than Clinton filtered it in his 1998 speeches.
Posted by Dravur on August 20, 2007 09:09 AMDravur, you said:
"So, you can debate the war and how it was fought, how it should be fought etc. but it is a fact that Bush had no special dispatches from Iraq before the war and that he knew there were no WMDs there."
I'll assume you meant it's a fact that Bush didn't know there were no WMD's (Fruedian slip much?) So I can't debate whether the war should have been fought in the first place? The only acceptable option is to debate how it should be fought? How sad that an American would say such an un-American thing.
And Bush, the "Unitary Executive" had no information that Congress didn't have? Really?
Regarding the massaging of intelligence to provide a false premise for invading Iraq, have you ever heard of Richard Feith and the Office of Special Plans, created by Rummy the Dummy to make a case for invading a country that posed us no threat?
It was an office staffed by political appointees whose mandate was to provide the "evidence" necessary to take our country to war against Iraq.
Maybe you've never heard of Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, this is what she said about the pre-war goings on in that office: "They would draw up 'talking points' they would use and distribute to staff officers for inclusion in any background papers or other documentation provided to their senior officers throughout the Pentagon, and presumably to the office of the Vice President, but the talking points would be changed continually, not because of new intel (intelligence), but because the press was poking holes in what was in the memos."
That's just the tip of the Ice-Berg. Can I continue, or am I only allowed to complain about how the war was/is fought?
Posted by Charles B on August 20, 2007 09:56 AMCharles B: The power elites of both parties create talking points by shading or twisting the truth to fit their agendas. Until you're ready and able to crucify both parties, holding the feet of both to acting responsibly, quite your partisan whining. You sound as ridiculous as 40acres crying for entitlements -- you cry for fairness on the part of Republicans while giving a pass to the Democrats on this Iraqi mess.
Where's your indignation to Hillary's twisting her position to one of "they lied to me"? She was more in the know of the intelligence she and Bill received prior to Bush getting the same faulty intel. If you give one side a pass you have to give the same pass to the other side or you're being hypocritical in your position against the war.
CA
Posted by on August 20, 2007 12:00 PMCA:
What have I said that indicates partisanship?
I have never registered with either major party.
I have almost never voted for anyone in either major party.
I have on numerous occasions voiced my displeasure with both the Democrats who voted to authorize the war and the capitulating crowd of invertebrates that now occupy Democratic seats. I won't be voting for Hillary if she's the nominee for the very reasons you laid out.
I do and will continue to bash Republicans and their ideology more than Democrats because they've been in power and have made the crucial decisions over the last six years. I want the pendulum to swing to the left, yes, but that doesn't make me partisan, it makes me a progressive and liberal, something very few Democrats can claim accurately to be...
You simply don't know what you're talking about regarding my positions and your perception of me as being hypocritical.
I am not anti-war, for instance, I am a realist about this. I am anti Iraq war.
And by the way, why don't you tell us how you feel about the issues we're discussing. Do you disagree with what you consider my partisan opinions or not? Isn't a discussion of the issues more important than some anecdotal tabulation of my "partisanship"? Can I only speak if there is perfect partisan equity in my criticisms?
Posted by Charles B on August 20, 2007 01:15 PMCharles B:
"I have on numerous occasions voiced my displeasure with both the Democrats who voted to authorize the war and the capitulating crowd of invertebrates that now occupy Democratic seats."
The only thing you've ever complained about here re democrats is that they voted for invading Iraq, voted to fund the surge, etc...
You never complain about anythng re dems unless it's connected to Bush. What about corruption? Excessive pork (that you complain about when the reps do it)? Criminal behavior? Both parties do it but mums the word if it involves the left.
Hardly what you can consider bipartisan.
Posted by KW on August 20, 2007 02:30 PMKW said:
"You never complain about anythng re dems unless it's connected to Bush. What about corruption? Excessive pork (that you complain about when the reps do it)? Criminal behavior? Both parties do it but mums the word if it involves the left."
Sorry to disappointed you KW. When have you ever heard me say anything about excessive pork on either side of the aisle?
I have complained bitterly about the corrupt and incompetent Ken Salazar- much more so than Allard.
Criminal behavior? I condemn all of it, it just so happens that 9 out of 10 congressmen who get busted lately are Republicans.
I have admonished the Democrats for shielding Rep. Jefferson from investigation and not forcing his resignation.
As usual KW, you simply don't know what you're talking about.
Because you're a joke.
Posted by Charles B on August 20, 2007 03:22 PM"Criminal behavior? I condemn all of it, it just so happens that 9 out of 10 congressmen who get busted lately are Republicans."
Do you just make these numbers up out of thin air or do you need to go back to numbers school?
Ignorance of facts is no excuse CB.