• Front page
• Receive letters on your RSS reader

Brian Stuckey of Denver writes:

In view of the Wall Street Journal report on contributions to the Hillary Clinton campaign, serious questions remain about the integrity of the Clinton campaign. It does seem odd that Norman Hsu, reported a wealthy New York businessman, has contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Democratic Party, much of it earmarked for the Clinton campaign through the William Paw family near San Francisco. Now the Los Angeles Times reports that Hsu is a fugitive and is wanted in California.
Yet, Howard Wolfson, campaign spokesman, claims that “there has been no questions about his integrity or his commitment to playing by the rules, and we have absolutely no reason to call his contributions into question.” We hope the Congress will conduct a full investigation of possible violations of campaign finance law. The facts demand nothing less.

This letter has not been edited.

READER COMMENTS

Wanna see a vanishing act? How much do you want to bet that Mr Hsu is already out of the country along with the Indonesian gardener, Charlie tree, etc.

When these Clinton donors are brought into the light, they scurry to their own country faster than Bill Clinton to a Speed Dating party.

Someone who supports Bush, Cheney & Albie Gonzales is pointing fingers & mentioning "integrity?" You're a funny guy, Stuckey!

Brian, You really need to get out of that dank apartment and get a life. I'm sure your building has a wheelchair ramp and the other accoutrements for the mentally and physically handicapped, like yourself.

The illegal financier of Hillary will be found shot in the back of the head like Vince Foster - obvious suicide. The Clinton hit squad gets another notch on the bedpost.

See how much more efficient the Democrats are. The Republicans out there embarrassments in public view -- the Democrats just arrange convenient suicides; hence, no embarrassment or scandal.

Vote Democratic, reduce population overcrowding!

Clintons are evil;
They make my testes retract.
Bush is my hero.

--a haiku from...

anti-Keith, your haiku's are hilarious. Please keep them coming.

While I don't agree with Mr. Stuckey's partisan policies, I don't see any left of center partisan actually commenting on the topic. Just attacking Mr. Stuckey.

drew and Mike H, what do you think about the contents of the letter? I know Mr. Stuckey is EXTREMELY partisan, and without the finger pointing of "your guy is worse" what do you think about this topic? Or are you unaware of this?

I am being sincere in my question, and actually hope to accomplish an aside as well. My hope is that not only will you answer the questions honestly, but also will take a minute, from time to time, to really look at and dissect why you are a partisan Democrat (at least I know drew is, he has told me before, Mike, I don't know, so no accusation intended).

When I was a kid, I was a big time "Republican" (I wanted to be like Alex P Keaton), and when I got into college, I opened my mind to investigate the "Why I feel this way" in regards to politics. I even voted for President Clinton in 1996. Then I started to do some comparisons (especially after the "Contract with America) of the two party system, and was compelled to move in a more libertarian direction (fiscally conservative, socially liberal, smaller government directly affecting people's lives, more over-sight of industry - especially after ENRON and the SOX Act of 02). And now am at the point where I really feel that 2 terms OR 8 years for any elected official is enough.

On a side note, how silly will we look in the history books if our last 4 Presidents, and at least the last 24 years will be someone with the last name of Bush or Clinton? Aren't we ALL ready for a change from those families? When we look at it honestly?

I'm with Dan2. Imagine a world where we didn't ever have to hear or read the words Clinton or Bush again! (Hillary should run as Hillary Rodham.)

Likewise, imagine an RMN Opinion section without Brian Stuckey in it! (While we're fantacizing, let's pretend we're all still young and beautiful and 9/11 didn't happen and we can all afford houses and college and TV is still watchable.)

That darn liberal media--they go on and on and on about HRC's campaign finances, but when it involves a Rethuglican candidate (with ties to Bush) they're quiet as church mice...

"Alan Fabian, a corporate executive from Cockeysville, Maryland, is one of Mitt Romney’s most important bundlers - a former George W. Bush “Ranger” (meaning he collected over $200,000 for Dubya’s campaign), now helping to gather contributions for the Romney campaign. He’s also, according to Federal prosecutors in Maryland, a big-time fraudster:

A federal grand jury indicted a corporate executive who allegedly ran a scheme to make $32 million in false purchases of computer equipment, spending the money instead on beach real estate and private jet travel, prosecutors said Thursday.

Alan B. Fabian, 43, of Cockeysville, is charged in a 23-count indictment with mail fraud, money laundering, bankruptcy fraud, perjury and obstruction of justice. The grand jury handed up the indictment Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Baltimore and it was unsealed Thursday."

The ONLY way to clean up this cess-pool is to drain the swamp and institute public financing of all political campaigns.

And, Brian, the only "serious question" that remains is the level of your stupidity and the depth to which it can sink.

hsu,who jump bail will be found dead.It's the clinton way.

The only question of integrity surrounds Mr Stuckey and why his foolish comments are provided so much ink by the RMN. He and a few others turn up very regularly and one wonders why the rest of the public does not enjoy such a pulpit.

Yah ,
What's it like not having a dick or a brain?
F'n tool.

every one leave her alone she is just following in billies foot steps. wonder who she will give top secrete infomation to? china already got theirs from bill. north korea nope they were helped by maddie and jimmie and billie, maybe iran needs some help. wonder if they have any money to give to her cause?

how everyone who was suppose to testify against the clintons ended up dead?

Anti keith,
You and your little haiku's suck,but continue to be gay and proud!

Hey not here meatball,look up ;clinton's murders on your computer.There is about 30 pages full of facts.

The conclusion is supported by the facts which are generated by the conclusion and I heard Peter Boyles say and give credit to Kurt Vonnegut: "And so it goes," and thus goes Keith whom I'm sworn to protect. Me, Deicide Grimes, dedicating D.C. to Keith:

Decide Corner: “I am not going to question your opinions. I am not going to meddle with your belief. I am not going to dictate to you mine. All that I say is, examine, inquire. Look into the nature of things. Search out the grounds of your opinions, the for and the against. Know why you believe, understand what you believe, and possess a reason for the faith that is in you.” -- Frances Wright

Serious questions remain about B. Stuckey's sanity, but his commitment to verbal flatulence and mindless partisanship is never in doubt.

POST A COMMENT

• 'Kid Nation' reality show a new low
• Rivers a shameful hire
• Too little news
• ‘Diesel’ fumes
• Unlocalized story a disservice to readers
• Riled up by Christian music
• Darling of the left
• Solutions too costly