[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Support for Pete Stark
Sunday, October 28 at 2:00 PM

Jaime Philp of Denver writes:

I fully support what Pete Stark said in the Senate and applaud his effort. This President and the Republican party need to be stopped. They are killing this country and I am proud that Pete Stark said something about it. I am sick of turning on the news to hear that the President wants to bomb Iran or wants to take away health care for children. I am disgusted by this administration and hope that they are brought up on criminal charges when they leave the White House. I want my rights back!

This letter has not been edited.


READER COMMENTS

What rights? Instead of putting the blame on the President and the Republicans, perhaps it is better than you take a look at yourself.

Posted by Brian Stuckey on October 28, 2007 02:41 PM

Brian Stuckey has his nose in mf Bush's rectum so firmly entrenched he is on a permanent high; however, why is mf Bush's approval rating of 24% so high? Ah! A rehetorical question: The Brian et als are addicted to mf Bush stench. I'll recycle Pete Stark's sentiment: ... death for Bush's amusement.

Deicide Corner: For a possible hint of Jesus’ historicity, Christian authorities relied heavily on a single brief paragraph in the works of the respected Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, who was born in 37 C.E., served as governor of Galilee , and traveled extensively in the very same area where Jesus allegedly lived and taught. If anyone was in a position to report the wonder-workings of a local holy man in his own parents’ generation, it was Josephus, a dedicated reporter of minute details. Yet in all his voluminous works, the single paragraph mentions Jesus Christ as follows:

“[Jesus was] a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was the Christ; and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.”


Posted by Richard Grimes, Deicide r22037@yahoo Free cassette of blasphemous songs with me on piano. on October 28, 2007 03:04 PM

Stark is an embarrasment that only San Francisco could foist off as a representative. He, and the letter writer, are a great example of why the democratic party has been pushed so far to the left that it no longer has anything in common with the majority of american voters. Stark is exactly why congressional democrats have accomplished virtually nothing even with a majority.

Posted by Neal5x5 on October 28, 2007 08:08 PM

Pete Stark and Richard Grimes should have their mouths washed out with soap.

Posted by CA on October 28, 2007 10:55 PM
...the democratic party has been pushed so far to the left that it no longer has anything in common with the majority of american voters.

More Americans agree with Democrats on the major issues of the day.

Neal5x5 thinks that he's mainstream, when he's really on the fringe.

...and no, I'm not a Democrat..

Posted by Charles B. on October 28, 2007 11:08 PM

Stark apoligized for his remarks. He was wrong and you do not criticize and call the President names during wartime and he knew it.

I will accept him stepping up and apoligizing. He showed that he made a mistake and did the right thing.

Posted by Can I get an AMEN! on October 29, 2007 08:20 AM

Thanks, CA, I appreciate your civil reply. I am so incensed over mf Bush borrowing in excess of $billion to give to his "jew" god, I'm quite willing to kick his ass just long enough to punish Brian Stuckey who will be deprived of his fix for a few minutes until he can reinsert.

Deicide Corner: Why march over Iran? Because George Bush is talking about World War 3, and he's insane enough to start it. Because the IAEA says Iran is not building nuclear weapons, and the CIA says it would take at least 5 years even if they started now. Because the people who want war with Iran are the same bloodthirsty neocons who got us into Iraq. Because any strike against Iran, no matter how precise, would be met with counterattacks on U.S. troops in Iraq, on the people of Israel, and on oil shipments that would double the price of oil. And because Iran has not threatened to attack the U.S. in any way.

Posted by RG: Deicide on October 29, 2007 09:16 AM

Charles is so full of shit with his Im not a democrat talk. Does he think we havnt read his one sided rants before? Can anyone name one issue where Charles has not sided with dems?
Anyone?
The hilarious thing is he is part of the wacky new dem progressive wing and doesnt even fucking know it ,or worse ,refuses to admit it.


ADMIT IT!


Posted by on October 29, 2007 10:10 PM

Yo Posters: Recommend you dispense with objectional words to some as in 10:10 least the moderator cancel this section of the Rocky we all enjoy. Thanks.

Posted by JVB on October 31, 2007 10:54 AM

rightees on the right of me, leftees on the left of me, the twain will never meet.

I in the middle, surounded by the din of ignorant speech, find it hard to fathom their constant harping at each other over things they get from the pet sources of each.

How will I end this nonsense, if they insist on this constant noise? Why I'll go to my bar of choice and discuss it with the boys.

When we reach an agreement on the solution, we'll toast the both of them, and then buy them dresses, for they argue not like men.

Posted by Allen Campbell on October 31, 2007 11:48 AM

POST A COMMENT










Remember your personal info?






LATEST LETTERS
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]