August 18, 2008 9:35 PM
Open mic: Shaun Alexander a fit with Broncos?
One thing is certain about the Internet -- you readers always have something to say. And it seems that any chance you get to speak your piece and throw in an insult or three along the way, you'll do it.
Thing is, we love it. We encourage it. OK, well I love it and I encourage it. Response to what I put before you is beautiful, positive or negative. Make no mistake -- a lot of you love negative. I wonder sometimes how miserable life must be for some of you that you can't complete a paragraph without using an insult of some type.
I mean, does every comment to a printed story or blog from a sports writer have to include a personal insult? Maybe so. Besides, I guess it's a lot easier and more fun to dole out the insults while hiding behind your nicknames and monikers. Makes you feel real big, huh? Well, even with the heckles and insults, I love the interaction, the comments, the suggestions . . .
I mean, you've got to love it when someone hides behind the moniker CourtneyBrown98. What, RyanLeaf16 wasn't available?
We used to have a forum on our Web site titled "Speak Up!". I can't get into all the computer-speak in detail, but technical changes to the site resulted in a removal of the forums. But I still wanted a "forum" for the people ... The people have a need to call me an imbecile and I should provide them a fix to satisfy the need.
This is the best we could come up with for the moment. It's called Open Mic. I'll throw out a topic. You read and you rant. AND . . . if you have a topic you want out there, so that the readers can call you "idiot", "stupid", "imbecile" or whatever, then e-mail it to me (adamss@rockymountainnews.com) and I'll post it as an "Open Mic" topic ...
In the meantime, here's the first topic. Broncos, of course. I think quarterback Jay Cutler will be the first Broncos quarterback to throw at least 30 touchdowns in a regular season. But what about the Broncos running game.
The Broncos believed that rookie Ryan Torain would win the starting job. Torain, however, is out three months with an elbow injury. That leaves Selvin "Mr. 2000" Young and Andre "Chess King" Hall as the Broncos' top two backs.
You cool with those two, Bronco Fan? Well, here's a thought. Take a chance on free agent Shaun Alexander. Give him an incentive-laced contract that pays a minimum base salary and see how he performs. Reports indicate Alexander has been staying in shape, sitting around waiting for a call.
Neither Young nor Hall have the size or experience expected of an every-down back. Sure, they could split carries. But the Broncos believe Torain has the size and ability to carry the load.
Michael Pittman? What about him?
The Broncos didn't bring Pittman in to be a 1,000-yard rusher. They brought him in to compete for a roster spot. Pittman does a little bit of everything -- run, block, and most important, catch out of the backfield. He has that veteran pro's-pro attitude thing going. It plays well around the younger players and you want that in the locker room -- especially during training camp. Yes, he's had off-field issues, but on the field Pittman is well-respected by teammates.
Besides, who wants to get clobbered by some dude with biceps that would bring the Incredible Hulk to his knees?
So back to Alexander. When he was hungry for a raise three years ago Alexander ran for nearly 1,900 yards and 27 touchdowns with Seattle. Well, he's unemployed, so Alexander ought to be hungry again -- about as hungry as you can be after being cut from a contract that was worth $62 million.
You bring Alexander in, see what he has, give him the minimum and hope for the best. If it doesn't work out, you cut him (see Simeon Rice, 2007) and take your chance with Young and Hall.
OK, so it's your turn on the mic. Is Shaun Alexander worth the Broncos' time and money?
August 18, 2008
11:27 PM
Ray writes:
NO.....bring in Cedric Benson. Younger but has off the field issues. He will clean up once he sees how Young who he was a team mate with at Texas has become a very good RB. C. Benson is a better fit. Hell he might pan out.
August 19, 2008
8:33 AM
Ethan adler writes:
Yes, bring him in. Its worth taking a chance. He played injured last year so lets see what he can do when healthy, and with a decent line.
August 19, 2008
9:44 AM
vincenzo spiaggi writes:
absolutely!!! Is there no interest in him anywhere? I can't believe it!!!
August 19, 2008
9:44 AM
Ken writes:
Go for Alexander; like a previous writer said, he needs a good line to run with, and he does great. Give him what Seattle did the last couple of years, and you get what you'd expect.
August 19, 2008
10:37 AM
SE7EN writes:
You can never have too many Running Backs. Young and Hall are unproven. Torain is hurt as you said. Pittman is a bruiser, but not dynamic. We need Sapp at FB. Aldridge is FAST but way too light.
So why not? Alexander has experience & leadership. It wouldn't hurt to try him out for at lease a couple of preseason games if not more.
August 19, 2008
11:12 AM
bigbadthor writes:
I can't believe Sam you would seriously consider Alexander, this is the NFL (not for long) league, and if he hasn't perfromed in the past two years what makes you think he will do anything here. Alexander was a product of a great O-line in Seattle, mainly getting to run behind Hutchinson and Jones had a lot to do with his succes, ironic how when Hutchinson left his number plummeted and now that Hutchinson is with Minnesota they have two great backs, amzaing how O-lines work that way. Our RB situation will be fine, Torain will eventually be the best back in the AFC in three years and we will be back in the Super Bowl, Shannan has finally figured out when you have all-pro lineman, then you have a real shot at the Super Bowl.
August 19, 2008
12:27 PM
Matt Driscoll writes:
As a life long Bronco fan living in the Pacific Northwest, I can whole heartedly tell everyone out there even considering the notion of signing Shauna Alexander - IT'S NOT A GOOD IDEA! He's soft. He's washed up. And even if we signed him for a bargain it wouldn't be worth it. He's not a team player, as he proved throughout his career in Seattle, and every time a defender even thinks about tackling him Shauna takes a dive. If the Broncos sign Alexander it'll be a huge mistake. HUGE. We're better off with what we already have - especially after Torain comes back.
August 19, 2008
12:40 PM
SamAdamsSportsTalk writes:
Matt Driscoll calls Alexander "Shauna" ... Nice ... Hey, you saw more of Alexander than I did, so your take on his softness is noted ... But Alexander did toughen up -- and put up big numbers -- when he wanted the money in '05 ... I'm just saying he might have a season's worth of 1,100 yards left in him ...
August 19, 2008
12:43 PM
leon writes:
no shaun alexander. every point matt driscoll makes is correct.
August 19, 2008
12:44 PM
anthony1979 writes:
I say bring him in if he isn't too proud to take that minimum contract you speak of but I think we should only use him in short yardage situations...
August 19, 2008
12:46 PM
Spider writes:
I think the Broncos have already showed that bringing in a RB past his prime, ala Tony Dorsett and Lawrence McCutcheon doesn't really pan out. Besides they take time away from the young RB's who need the experience to become better. No Alexander or Benson please!
August 19, 2008
1:20 PM
NoAlexa writes:
I'm another lost Denver native in Seattle. Listen to Driscoll. SA was always a passive runner unless the play was in the Redzone. SOmething like 70% of those 27TD were behind Hutch and Jones. The Broncos one cut and go scheme doesn't work with a read and wait for it to develop back like Alexander. Also you've never seen a back fall rather then take a hit unless they were trying to run the clock like SA, only he does it in the first offensive series.
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
August 19, 2008
1:25 PM
dadc43 writes:
You would be fools not to. Alexander avg over 1400 yards and 15+ tds for 5 years in a row. During this time his o-lien had an avg ranking of 15th. Everyone remembers 05 when they were ranked 6th in run blocking . but they forget 01-03 when they never reached the top 10. During his last 2 years in Seattl;e his o-lien ws ranked 28th adn 29th in run blocking. Hard to run when you have no place to go. He playe don a broken foot adn out performed LT adn ran for over 200. LAst year he played with a broken wrist, bruised ribs, twisted knee and ankle behind the 29th ranked run blocking 0-line and for the first 3 game avg 90+ yards, and 4.4 ypc, it was not until the injuries all piled up he slowed down. The whole Shauna and laying down is junk and BS from a bunch of haters period. As to soft Not sure you can call anyone soft who ran on a broken foot and nearly ran the team to the NFC championship game with little to no help form his o-line or QB. Against the bears in the playoof he had over 100 yards and 2 tds, again behind a bottom 4 o-line. He has plenty left and would do a great job. Do not let haters make your decescions. Oh and I am from Seattle and have seen every game he has played, so I woudl know.
August 19, 2008
2:14 PM
Kevin writes:
Another Pacific NW voice here, (maybe we should start a Broncos support group up here)
Heartfelt agreement on the Matt Driscoll Shauna Alexander take. SA reminded me last year of Barry Bonds light, without the production of Bonds. Not a team guy in the locker room, Broncos need to work with Young and Hall, and wait for Torain, that is worth the price.
BTW I think Pittman can be a little more valuable than people are giving him credit for.
Money spent on SA is wasted money!
August 19, 2008
3:10 PM
Jerry writes:
That idea doesn't even deserves a response. If you think you're smarter, have more football savvy, know more about all the players involved than Mike Shannahan . . . Sorry!
August 19, 2008
3:18 PM
john writes:
Its too bad that he does lack the ability to be a team player. We need a good veteran to lead a young team. I guess Pittman can do it but we'll see. SA couldn't hurt but when Torrain comes in I think he'll take the starting position. The elbow injury to Torrain is the best thing that could have happen to him. Now he'll have to condition harder, work out harder and study the books harder. When he comes in mid season, he'll explode!! Walter Payton 2!! Ha ha just seeing if you guys were paying attention.
August 19, 2008
3:54 PM
MIKE writes:
I LIVE IN SEATTLE, ALEXANDER IS THE SOFTEST RUNNING BACK IN THE HISTORY OF THE GAME, BIG MISTAKE TO SIGN HIM,WHEN HE IS IN THE GAME THE DEFENSE HAS 33 TACKLERS GOING AFTER HIM, 11 WITH THE OPPOSITE TEAM AND 22 PHANTOM TACKLERS, SEEMS LIKE THE PHANTOM TACKLERS ARE MORE AGRESSIVE.MY GRANDMA WOULD GET MORE YARDAGE.
August 19, 2008
4:02 PM
Matt Driscoll writes:
Sam - While there may be a slight chance Shauna has something left in his less than punishing legs, the fact he toughened up and performed when he wanted a contract- and only when he wanted a contract - gives you picture perfect insight into what type of "me first" player this guy is. He's always put himself before the team, and that's exactly why - once he got his huge payday - he became so very, very soft in Seattle. Check that: he was soft to begin with, he just got softer. We're much better off with young guys who are actually driven and love the game of football. The last thing we need is a toothy featherfoot looking for a few more NFL paydays.
August 19, 2008
4:06 PM
Mick writes:
Mike's exactly right. "Old and soft" is the answer to the question, "why hasn't anyone shown the least iota of interest in this guy?"
I hate to say it, but if we pick up anyone for a flier, I'd agree with Ray-- Cedric Benson. He's a bruiser, can get the red zone yards, and would fill in Travis Henry's off field vacancy. (just kidding on the last one... but it's probably true).
August 19, 2008
4:41 PM
tmcd writes:
I can't believe Alexander hasn't been picked up. Yeah he would fit well here and under Sam's suggested incentive based contract, what's the risk? If I remember he is a good citizen and a great back. Didn't he play with a broken bone in his arm a couple of years ago?
August 19, 2008
4:58 PM
thunder555 writes:
Seems that the Bronco fans in the NW voice a solid NO. I'm with them. Terrel Davis and Clinton portis we're young when they broke through in our scheme. Fact of the matter is that SA would probably do fairly well under our system. But let's not hold down a talanted runner by bringing in a vet who MAY OR MAY NOT work out and take away carries. It's no secret, we're a young team. Maybe youth can shine through this year. GO BRONCOS!!!!!
August 19, 2008
5:07 PM
Cutler6 writes:
Sam, come on Shawn Alexanders best days are behind him, he runs tenatively anymore, and just doesn't seem to dish out punishment, but takes it. Why do you think not one other team has signed him yet? He is done, Denver doesn't need to sign players just because they were good and carry an MVP name, every player gets washed up at some point in time, some sooner than others.
August 19, 2008
5:14 PM
Rocky writes:
I personally think that the Bronco's success record when it comes to running backs has proven itself. I don't think they need to pay big $$$ for a "big name" running back.
August 19, 2008
5:30 PM
CourtneyBrown98 writes:
i don't think i quite understand you Sam. "HIDE BEHIND THE MOINKER" DATZ MY COUSIN COURTNEY BROWN. AND I REP HIM TO DA FULLEST. HOW DID YOU COME ACROSS THIS TOPIC AS AN ISSUE?? BECAUSE I KNEW I FORMED A QUESTION TO MIKE KIZLIS ABOUT US GETTING SHAWN ALEXANDER! SO I GUESS I MADE YOUR LIFE EASY FOR A DAY! WE SHOULD GET SHAWN ALEXANDER AS I MENTIONED FIRST AND YOU MENTIONED AFTER ME! SHAWN ALEXANDER IS A PROVEN VETERAN AND HE WILL WORK GREAT UNDER OUR SCHEME AND WILL BE A BIG TIME PLAYER FOR THE BRONCOS. HE IS THE WORK HORSE BACK THAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR. VERY TERELL DAVIS LIKE. GOOD BACKS ARE HARD TO FIND.BUT THEY ARENT WHEN THEY ARE STARING YOU RIGHT IN THE FACE! MAYBE HIS PREVIOUS CONTRACT HAS ALOT TO DO WITH US NOT EVEN LOOKING HIS DIRECTION.BUT HIS SPIRIT HAS TO BE A LIL BROKEN RIGHT NOW SINCE HIS DEPARTURE FROM THE SEAHAWKS. THERE IS NO DOUBT IN MY MIND HE WANTS TO PLAY FOOTBALL. WHICH LEADS ME TO THIS NEXT QUESTION, ARE WE BROKE??LOL WITH THIS GUY WE WOULD BE A DEFINITE 13-3 SUPERBOWL BOUND TEAM! HALL AND YOUNG ARE GOOD BACKS DONT GET ME WRONG!BUT I THINK THEY ARE MORE OF SECOUND STRING RB'S. AND BY US PLAYING THEM BOTH THAT FURTHER PROVES IT! ALL WE ARE MISSING IS A PRIMERE BACK FOR THIS TEAM. AT WHICH I THINK WE WILL STILL BE SUCCESSFUL THIS YEAR BECAUSE I KNOW WE WILL PRODUCE OTHERWISE! I AM A TRUE DENVER BRONCO FAN. SOMETIMES I QUESTION CERTAIN THINGS BECAUSE TOUGH LOVE IS ALWAYS NEEDED. BUT I SAID SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE SEASON WE ARE GOING TO BE THE O8' SUPERBOWL CHAMPS! I LOVE DEM BRONCOS MORE THEN YOU'D EVER KNOW!! THANKS FOR THE PUBLICITY TOO. I LOVE THE PROFESSIONAL APPROACH. GOD BLESS AND TAKE CARE!!
~EIESHA MONI MORANT IS THE FULL NAME~
August 19, 2008
5:33 PM
bleahey writes:
He'd be a better bet than the Ohio State thug that cost a good draft pick! Nothing to lose, why not give him a shot!
August 19, 2008
5:35 PM
Dynamicdave writes:
Hey, Sam. 1st off, I would never bash you. Lincicome, yeah, every chance I get, but you're good, in my books. Now to the subject at hand. No, to Alexander. He is used baggage. He couldn't get it done the past two years in Seattle, what makes anyone think he will be different in Denver? No, to Cedric, as well. He has no much personal baggage with him. Isn't that what we're trying to clean up? Young and Hall have looked good, so far. They moved the ball against the 1st defense of Dallas. Hillis is starting to play again and will be one heck of a FB. Torain will heal, so he's a keeper. Sapp has experience in our backfield. Pittman? Nothing spectacular yet, but he can add some leadership to the younger RB's. Stay with Young and Hall and wait for Torain to get healthy. Alridge? He is fast but very small and is hurt. He may not make the roster because of his injury.
August 19, 2008
5:38 PM
Dynamicdave writes:
CourtneyBrown98, I think we got it the 1st time, ha, ha.
August 19, 2008
5:40 PM
Brandon writes:
Torain will be the best back in the AFC in the years to come? Good lord....no one has seen this kid perform. Put your crowns away. While I have no doubt that torain will be great, I think Alexander would be a good snag. I have always thought so. If you can take an undrafted rookie and have him almost rush 1000 yards, than Im sure someone with the experience of Alexander can make 1300-1400 yards. That was the whole theory behind Henry, and it was a good theory. However, his off field issues interfered. Using the same formula but with a player with little off field issues, ie Shaun Alexander, you can't lose. And like Sam said, if it doesnt work out, we are no worse off than we were before with Young and Hall.
August 19, 2008
5:58 PM
samadamssportstalk writes:
Let me help you CourtneyBrown98 ... First of all, it's nice that you started a conversation or whatever about Alexander and the Broncos on someone else's forum/blog ... Doesn't mean we all read it ... And who is Mike Kizlis any way? ... Alexander needs a team, the Broncos might need a proven running back - wow, only you could come up with a connection of the two ... I bet if we look back at forums past, we'll find that others have brought up the possibility ... Actually, I made the connection in a column last March -- before the Seahawks released him!!! Alexander was griping about the team signing two free agent running backs -- Julius Jones and T.J. Duckett ... The handwriting was on the wall in March, which was before yesterday when you mentioned it to Mike Kizlis, right? ... I'm just trying to make some conversation with readers on this blog - and you're always welcome to chime in!
August 19, 2008
6:00 PM
CourtneyBrown98 writes:
COURTNEY BROWN. BRONCOS SURE DIDNT HAVE ANY COMPLAINTS. THAT 'BROWNCOS' LINE WE HAD WAS THE REASON WHY WE WENT 13-3. COURTNEY HAD ALOT OF WORTH ETHIC. ONE OF THE MOST DECENT GUYS THAT HAS EVER PLAYED THE GAME. THE ONLY REASON HE IS NOT PLAYING TO DATE FOR THE BRONCOS IS BECAUSE OF INJURIES. COURTNEY WAS DEDICATED TO FOOTBALL HE KEPT COMING BACK INSPITE OF HIS SETBACKS WITH INJUIES. COME ON ADAM. I COULD WRITE BETTER COLUMNS THEN YOU WITH MY HANDS TIED BEHIND MY BACK. I MEAN, WHO WATCHES SPAM-U-LCAST?????????????? THAT BUNCH OF JUNK. BESIDES I THOUGHT OF SHAWN ALEXANDER WHEN I FIRST HEARD HIM MENTIONED IN THE FREE AGENT POOL. LET ME GET YOUR PAYCHECK CAUSE I KNOW I WOULD DO A MUCH BETTER JOB THEN YOU. GET SOME REAL STORIES, SOME ACTUALLY FOOTAGE OF THE BRONCOS ON THE PRACTICE FIELD. AND MOST IMPORTANLY A LIFE. COURTNEY MADE IT TO THE NFL. A FEAT ALOT OF PEOPLE WONT KNOW ABOUT!
COURTNEY ISNT THE ONLY COUSIN IVE HAD THAT MADE IT TO THE NFL. THERE'S PIERSON PRIOLEAU, JOE HAMILTON AND THE ROOKIE FROM PENN STATE RODNEY KINLAW (COURTNEY'S NEPHEW)
August 19, 2008
6:03 PM
Dynamicdave writes:
Brandon, everyone keeps saying "no worse off then we were before with Young and Hall"? Where were we in trouble with them to start with? They haven't done anything wrong to be looked down on as someone who has failed us. This is just "predictions" from people who have a crystal ball that says they will fail. I say, if it's not broke, then don't fix it. Torain is our long term, back, but until then, Young and Hall can get it done. Show me in two preseason games, where they haven't? Hall scored on a goal line run, against the 1st string of the Dallas Cowboy D. I would need more proof from you or anyone else that can show to me that they are doomed to failure. But Alexander is NOT the answer. The young kids have been getting it done in two games. I say let them run with it (pun intended).
August 19, 2008
6:21 PM
CourtneyBrown98 writes:
ALL I'M SAYING IS BASHING A GUY BECAUSE HE KEPT GETTING HURT IS SOMETHING A REAL MAN SHOULD'NT DO. NO DOUBT THE REASON WHY HE KEPT GETTING HURT WAS BECUASE HE WAS SO MUCH OF A TREAT HE WAS BEING DOUBLE TEAMED EVERY CHANCE. THERE IS ALOT OF OVER AND UNDERATED PEOPLE IN THIS LEAGUE STILL PLAYING. EVERYONE PICKS NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS AS THE NUMBER ONE TEAM STILL.THEY ARE OVERRATED TO ME. THEY SHOULD WIN BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN CHEATING FOR SO LONG THEY SHOULD BE ACCUSTOMED TO WHAT TEAMS ARE DOING NOW. NO ONE IS BASHING THEM FOR THAT. MAKING CONVERSATION IS A GOOD THING BUT YOU'RE THE ONE WHO BROUGHT ALL THE NEGATIVITY TO ME! SO YOUR THE ONE WHO YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT IN YOUR OWN COLUMN. WHAT DID I EVER SAY NEGATIVE ABOUT THE BRONCOS?????? NOT A DARN THING! THATS NOT FAIR TO ME IS IT? PEOPLE NEVER SEEM TO AMAZE ME! U COULD POST SOMETHING ABOUT COURTNEYBROWN98 BEING A BUST. WHILE NOT MENTIONING HOW THE PATRIOTS CHEATED THROUGHOUT THE BILL BELICHECK ERA! SOMETHING THAT WILL PLAGUE THE NFL IN PEOPLES MINDS FOREVER!WHAT DOES THE PATRIOTS HAVE TO DO WITH THIS BLOG YOU ASK? NOTHING.. THE SAME AS COURTNEYBROWN98.YOU SHOULD KNOW HOW HIGH SOMEONE IS PICKED WILL NEVER MAKE HIM ANY BETTER THEN THE GUYS BEHIND HIM. IN ALL REALITY ITS JUST A NUMBER.HEY MAN COULD YOU GET ME A JOB LIKE YOURS?....LOL
August 19, 2008
6:29 PM
SamAdamsSportsTalk writes:
OK, CourtneyBrown98 ... I'm not doubting your writing skills ... Submit your resume to 101 West Colfax Avenue ... Your family obviously has a great bloodline for athletics ... Now, let's get back to Shaun Alexander ... not Shawn Alexander, but Shaun Alexander ...
August 19, 2008
6:59 PM
Josh writes:
We still have what, three preseason games left? One of these young guys has to be given more of a chance to step up and prove himself. My money is on Selvin Young. He had to play second fiddle to Vince Young in college and because of that was never really a featured back. Alexander is great behind a solid O-line, the question is, are the Broncos really that solid on the line? The glory days of Stinky and Zimm, coached by the great Alex Gibbs are far behind us. Plus Cutler, another young guy, may disappear behind the huge ego Alexander brings with him. Give Selvin some love!!!
August 19, 2008
7:16 PM
Dynamicdave writes:
Josh, 2 preseason games left. We play Green Gay Smackers and the Arizona Bluebirds (just kidding). I love Selvin. I've been saying that Young and Hall make a good 1-2 punch. True, I was hyped about Torain, but he's hurt and we'll have to wait to see what he can deliver, later, down the road.
August 19, 2008
7:55 PM
DCBonco writes:
I'm not sure if the games are being televised in the Denver area. I watched the first two games and didn't notice a real need for an additional running back. Young doesn't have the best average per carry, but he got a lot of his carries when the line wasn't performing in the first game and then behind the second unit in the second game. Hall is averaging 4.5 yards a carry and Alridge is averaging 5. If the Broncos are proof of anything, it's that they don't need a "proven" back. I feel completely comfortable with the backs we have. As the line gets better, the back will play better. Torain coming back will be gravy. We went out and got veteran receivers and a third year guy and a rookie look like the best of the bunch. I think the reporters and fans need to go out and acquire some patience.
August 19, 2008
8:00 PM
Brandon writes:
Dave,
I totally agree with you about Hall and Young getting it done. They are doing very well. My point, however, is why NOT see how Alexander does in this system. If he is horrible, then Young and Hall will still be there. There was a time when Shaun Alexander was a BEAST. So he fell off (Madden curse).... Everyone knows that Denver's system is RB friendly, and if SA has half the skill he had 2-3 years ago, he will be a beast again. And once again.....if he don't work.....Young and Hall will still be there...in other words, we have nothing to lose.
August 19, 2008
8:07 PM
Jamaro writes:
Never hurts to have players. I am looking forward to Young and Hall but at the same time you need to be able to have a different look. Hall seems to have added strength but they both still are small backs. I have always wanted to see Sapp get some looks, but with Hillis having injury problems does not look like they could afford to use Sapp as say a short yardage back. They said Lewis had nothing left in the tank and look what he did last year for the Browns. There still are cuts upcoming and more players will hit the market, but I do think that it is something to be considered if Pittman does not cut it as a third back or FB; I want to see what Hillis can do healthy as well for that 2nd FB spot.
August 19, 2008
8:08 PM
Dynamicdave writes:
DCBonco, exactly. But how much patience do some of these "fans", have? I've been reading comments from morons who said that we are doomed to failure after the 1st preseason game? Rocket scientists. I'm very excited this year. I think we have a real shot at turning some heads and shutting up some sceptics. I'll be watching the Broncos/Packers this Friday. Bank on it. I don't think the following preseason game will be shown (Cardinals), but our Bronco bar in Vegas will pick up ALL the regular season games. Not bad though, to watch the 1st 3 preseason games. I can survive, I suppose, with missing the final one.
August 19, 2008
8:14 PM
Dynamicdave writes:
Brandon, I just don't want to see Alexander come in, screw up the rhythm and momentum that Young & Hall are building. They looked like a well oiled duo last week. I also don't think Shaun's attitude will fit in with the Broncos. That "me, me, me" stuff is why we canned Walker. I'm going to have to stick with the duo. And when the rest are healed, then we will have a solid backfield like we planned.
August 19, 2008
8:51 PM
Spider writes:
Dave
For the life of me I can't understand why you would want to bash Bernice. She never has a bad thing to say about anyone. :-)
CourtneyBrown98 I don't think that anyone has any doubt that the real CB could have been something special if it wasn't for the injuries. The only thing that I've seen anbody write about him that it was too much a risk for the Broncos to sign him with his health history. I also don't think that anybody doubts your ability to write. Too bad you broke your index finger on the "Caps Lock" key.
August 19, 2008
8:56 PM
OPETH72 writes:
I agree with Mr. Adams here. I don't see what harm there would be in an incentive-laden deal. If he performs well, great. If not, oh well. And this is not to bash Young/Hall. Maybe they can do the job. Unfortunately, it seems no one, not even their biggest supporters, believes that either can do it individually. And for those who call him soft, you all seem to be holding a grudge. I do not know any of you personally, so I cannot know that for certain. Just a feeling I get reading your words. I can't call a guy that rushes up towards the 2K mark as too soft. Make excuses for his TD's all you like. He didn't get all those yards in the red zone. Anyhow, I think it is worth the shot. Use a CB's roster spot. We don't run a quarter defense, so we would still have depth there. Put Torain on IR. Let him heal and get back in football shape and get ready for next year (odd saying that when this year is just starting). Rushing him back (no pun intended) could be worse. I want the guy in the starting line up, but I also want him healthy. Just throw Alexander a deal. Not really much to lose so where is the downside?
August 19, 2008
9:35 PM
CourtneyBrown98 writes:
tomayto, tomAAto..same difference! ShaWn should be worth the risk and he can't be asking for too much. that being said! We should get him!!!the only thing i would question would be his longevity. Otherwise, he will come out and strive our team towards perfection. we get him we could pick up how the pat's started off their season except we will win the big one!
August 19, 2008
9:40 PM
GStapleton writes:
Don't sign Shaun. He's a one season fix at best, and the Broncos are not a contender this year. Keep going with the youth movement and wait for Torain, or get another stud in the middle rounds of the draft next year.
August 19, 2008
10:09 PM
Dynamicdave writes:
Spider, Ha, ha. Yeah, she's a real gem, eh? GStapleton, I think they have the ability to be contenders, this year. But that's what makes these forums fun, the ability to debate, disagree, and learn new things, ideas and the like. I think their offense is going to be scoring a lot of points. The defense is going to be better so that will make a difference. I see no reason why we can't go to the playoffs. From there, it's anybody's game.
August 19, 2008
10:18 PM
OPETH72 writes:
The Broncos are very likely contenders. That is the whole point to the signing of Alexander being worth it. He could help. If he doesn't, it is not like Shanahan is going to keep using him. When you don't produce, when you can't handle the workload, when you put the ball on the ground, or when you just don't seem that into it, Shanahan puts you on the bench, on the Lions, or on the street (nowadays that street seems to lead into southeast Texas). Still see no harm in signing the guy.
August 19, 2008
10:27 PM
Old School Bronco writes:
C'mon guys, although I see your hesitance on signing a "has been" to our squad, we are in dire need of a 3rd and goal back.WE DO NOT HAVE ONE! Third and goal doesn't always mean 3rd and goal,it also means 3rd and "whatever".We need WHATEVER! Who better to fill this role than a guy who has been there and is very hungry?Go Broncos!
August 19, 2008
10:42 PM
Old School Bronco writes:
That being said.Sammy "freakin" Winder could park his 18 wheeler,step off his rig,rub on some ben-gay,throw on some "new age" pads and still get 750 behind this make shift line.
August 19, 2008
10:45 PM
Dynamicdave writes:
Why is everyone so sure that Hall, Hillis, Young, Sapp, or even Alridge, can't get it done? Do you guys base this on 2 games into the preseason? As I recall (yes, it was preseason, but it was our 1st string against Dallas 1st string D), Hall punched it in. Marshall also caught a pass. It won't always be the RB. But Hall showed it can work. Me thinks you all protest too much. Give the kids a chance. It seems like in reality the only ones who have faith in what we have, are the ones who said "no" to Alexander. Now, that doesn't mean Shanahan isn't still shopping, but I think it's a direct "slap in the face" to the RB's we already have. You want them to have confidence, not show them you doubt they can get the job done, especially when, so far, they have done what's been asked of them.
August 19, 2008
11:02 PM
mack writes:
Yo sam i am your super lame on the rockies recap shows stick with your column. anyways to answer your question hell no . . .
August 19, 2008
11:12 PM
OPETH72 writes:
I again have to emphasize (and I can only speak for me, obviously) I am not bashing who we have. I just don't want to find out 4 games in that regular season defensive schemes are not going to bode well for the guys we have. Honestly, I hope I am wrong and they both pile up a grand a piece. I am just going on their size and the history that has on how well they may hold up game after game. And I see no problem with having a "proven" guy there in case we need him. If they were to sign Alexander, and that intimidated either guy, that would be on them. I was a huge Plummer fan, always will be, but I will never understand why he took the approach that allowed his job to just be given up. It is the coach's job to put the best guys out there. You have to prove you are one of those guys. And it doesn't matter if you have to beat out a rookie, or beat out a vet. These guys that can't handle a little competition never make it. See one Javon Walker, and before him, one Ashley Lelie. That all being said, I do really hope we have a great rushing attack. As crazy as it will seem to some, that is my biggest question mark going into this season.
August 20, 2008
1:12 AM
SamAdamsSportsTalk writes:
Sorry Mack, but we had to edit the super classless ending to your comment ...
August 20, 2008
7:07 AM
soft and softer writes:
emphatic no on alexander. never understood why he was so highly regarded for easing himself through big running lanes. and agree with choosing cedric benson over alexander but totally disagree that benson is a tough runner. benson was criticized routinely in chicago for being surprisingly soft given his build. if the broncs are going to bring in anybody to complement young/hall/aldridge, they should bring in a hard-nosed bruiser, in the spririt of mike anderson / reuben droughns, and then hope torain gets less fragile with age. thought pittman was supposed to be that bruiser.
August 20, 2008
7:09 AM
DCBronco writes:
The main reason I don't believe we should bring in Alexander is that he will keep the young guys from getting a year of experience. Alexander would be in Denver for a year, period. Denver is most likely a year from making a true impact. Hall, Torain and Young could all be 1,500 runners, even more. Let them get those carries and allow them to become those veterans with experience that Denver will need a year or so from now for a Super Bowl run. As far as short yardage situations. I think Hall will provide what Denver needs there. He ran into 3 Cowboys Saturday, including Roy Williams and Zach Thomas, and maintained his balance and bounced the play to the outside and gain several yards. He was also hit at the 1 yard line and carried a guy into the end zone on his back. Denver has the talent to be a contender now and will become one of the teams to play for the Super Bowl for years to come after this year.
August 20, 2008
7:13 AM
SeattleBronco writes:
Shaun Alexander has been a steady work horse for the Seahawks, but as mentioned before he avoids punishment.
He has not been a proven threat out of the backfield as a reciever and every defense knows that. So with him in the line up it limits the play calling.
Alexander also lacks pass blocking skills. When he won MVP I thought it was a mistake, Hasselbeck should have walked away with it.
August 20, 2008
8:28 AM
Russell writes:
Ask yourself this. Is Shaun Alexander better than our worst running back? The answer to that would be no.
Are other teams asking this and coming up with the same answer? Probably.
August 20, 2008
8:33 AM
dadc43 writes:
Easrly in Alexnader careere he avg over 48 reception a year and fo rhis career he has the same reception Percetange as LT. He can catch when thrown to. They stopped throwint to him after 03 when they trimmed he play book down for Hass.As for blocking over the last 4 years he has become a decent blocker he will nto knock anyone down but he gets th ejobdoen and has given up less sacks adnhits per attempt than the top 10 backs in the league. He is not a cancer in th elocker room or a me first guy. Last I checked me first guys do nto risk there careers playing on a borken foot, or with a broken hand or with bruised ribs and severly twisted kness and ankles likes Alenxader has these last 2 years. If he has any help form what has been an aweful o-lien he would not have gotten hurt. If teams did not kep on him, and dare Hass to beeat them he woudl not have gotten hurt. The fact is he has plenty left. AS to complaingn about the new backs, he asked why, only after he had a meeting with the GM were he ws told they had no intentions of cutting him, or asking him to take a pay cut or replacing him. SO then when they did the oppositie he asked about it. Then he greeted JJ with open arms including takinghim to his church. But agian unfortunately you have allot of haters who are replying on this subject and most have no clue what they are talking about. Alexander would help the Broncos and shoudl be picked up.
August 20, 2008
9:20 AM
NJ#1BRONCOFAN writes:
I read most of these posts and I didn't see anyone making the point that this is now Jay Cutler's team. The days of TD and bruising running games are OVER! This is the new NFL you have a young leader in Jay Cutler and young backs in Young and Hall. Personally I think Andre is more a fit for the #1 RB. Bringing in a "veteran" like SA is not going to make the running game better. Let the young RB's grow with the young leader and build a solid foundation. Look at the past recent SB winners (Giants, Colts, Pats, Steelers). Did it take a #1 superstar RB to win those championships? No. Did we need that in 97-98? Yes. Did those teams have a solid leader at QB? Yes. (Eli is boarderline but after that play you got to give it to him.)The game has changed. Have faith in the talent we have now. Jay can be one of the best in the NFL just like Brady and Peyton and the Broncos can get it done without getting someone like SA. Does anyone remember Travis Henry? He put up decent #'s in Tennessee in 2006 but didn't add anything for the Broncos other than off the field headlines. We don't need that. We got a very good young team. Cutler, Marshall, Royal, Hall or Young is a GREAT start for many years to come. Shaun enjoy your NFL Sunday ticket I'm sure you have a nice comfy recliner to watch all the games on Sunday.
August 20, 2008
10:23 AM
NoAlexa writes:
As for SA, notice only 1 of 6 guys who lives in the NW thinks he would be a good pick up. And the one yes voice calls us 'haters' which usually comes from fans who can't move on from the Seahawks superbowl team.
One other way to view this, who do the Bronco's cut to keep SA? One of our young RB's? Everyone likes Toran for the future but he's injury prone and CBrown has made very clear that injuries can kill a career. Maybe cut Barrett the safety as he won't start this year. Or not take Woodyard as he would be a couple years away? Maybe only carry 1 backup tackle/guard? Ever look at the roster and try to cut down to the season amount of players, someone with future promise or depth at another postion other then running back would have to go.
August 20, 2008
10:32 AM
OPETH72 writes:
I can agree the game has changed........a little. And most of that can be attributed to rule changes that keep the secondary scared to be as aggressive as they used to be allowed play. So on that you have a valid point. However, I am guessing that if you asked any one of those quarterbacks of now you mentioned they would emphatically say they would love to have that one back that struck deep fear in an opponent. A guy like LT. And I get it, that is rare at any point, and even more so these days, but that doesn't mean you can't look to find one. I keep hearing it can't be found these days because defenders are bigger and stronger. OK, if that is true, then how are undersized guys better? If defenders continue the trend of getting bigger and stronger are we eventually going to have 5 smaller backs switching off from series to series? I am not saying this 2 back system won't work out just fine, but the point is simple: Alexander wouldn't hurt anything by being signed. And by the way, Henry was leading the league in rushing before he vanished. So Henry would have been well worth it had he not had all the personal issues, injury, and apparent lack of desire. Shanahan was clearly searching for that "one back". It didn't work because of the guy himself, but Shanahan evaluated the talent part correctly. I believe he will continue to search for that. And I hope Torain is that guy next year. So now, hypothetically, bringing in Alexander for one year, if he could get us 1200, and the other 2 on limited duty could get us 800 would be fine. If no Alexander, fine as well. I just still see no risk and a real potential for reward.........
August 20, 2008
10:45 AM
OPETH72 writes:
NoAlexa, put Torain on IR. Even if he was ready in November, why risk him? If come November we are doing well enough, and in the hunt, that would mean the others were getting it done without him already. And if the season is over in November, what would be the point in rushing him back? Not to mention with Elam gone we already have one open spot we didn't have before. Take a guy off and put him on the practice squad. SA would only be here a year most likely anyway. The roster spot argument is weak. I get why it comes up, but that is not a valid reason to hesitate bringing in a guy that has that sort of a proven track record. And it is the Seattle people that seem to be the haters. They still come across as feeling betrayed. Were they running this smack when he was piling up the yards and scoring like mad? I doubt it......And if "falling down" and being "soft" gets you close to 2K yards, maybe running back coaches should start teaching that.
August 20, 2008
11:25 AM
Chad B writes:
Hello??? How easily people forget how good Mr. Alexander once was. Until his injuries he was a perennial all-pro. Then his line just decides to stop blocking for him? And its his fault? We all know what the Broncos line can do for a running back. How many mediocre backs have rushed for more then a 1000 because of that line? I say sign him for the year with clauses in his contract for bonuses on how well he does.
August 20, 2008
11:45 AM
Shauna Alexander writes:
As a life long Bronco fan living in the Pacific Northwest, I can whole heartedly tell everyone out there even considering the notion of signing Shauna Alexander - IT'S NOT A GOOD IDEA! He's soft. He's washed up. And even if we signed him for a bargain it wouldn't be worth it. He's not a team player, as he proved throughout his career in Seattle, and every time a defender even thinks about tackling him Shauna takes a dive. If the Broncos sign Alexander it'll be a huge mistake. HUGE. We're better off with what we already have - especially after Torain comes back.
August 20, 2008
12:26 PM
CourtneyBrown98 writes:
NJ#1bronco fan-
We all know it's Cutlers team..but the game getz 50 timez harder when you your not a balanced football team. We still are going to have to have a pretty solid running game like every successful team has had to win football games. It's no doubt I think we will pass more often then running because we have the necesarry elements for it. Celvin YOung predicted a 2,000 season. obiviously he's has to share the load with Hall on top of the passing plays. so its nearly impossible for that to happen. Obviously Selvin hasn't proven anything to the coaches quite yet. We are just working with what worked last year. HOneslty i thought Pittman could come in and get the job done but i guess not. Getting Shawn or Cedric would be fine for me. We need some size at that position like we normally have! Torrain is out now so we can't rely on him right now. Sign a one yr. contract and see what happens.
August 20, 2008
1:26 PM
S writes:
Sam Adams should lose his job for writing this article. No one who knows anything about football would write this. Please reassign him to the intern desk where he belongs.
August 20, 2008
1:34 PM
OPETH72 writes:
That is all you have Driscol or Drisco or whatever your name is? Putting up the same post twice, word for word, except this time renaming yourself Shauna? I am inclined to believe that maybe that is actually your real name. That would explain the post. And I will repeat it for you: if taking a dive, and being soft get you almost 2K, and put him well over a grand other seasons, it should be taught by coaches. Hey guy, if you really are a Broncos fan, and you really do live up there in the NW, check out the realignment of the league. Seattle is not in our division any longer. You can shift that hate over to Cali.
August 20, 2008
1:52 PM
NoAlexa writes:
To everyone who points out that Alexander was a good back for several years and a great back for 2 more, your correct. No question the numbers are there. But looking at the last two years, after his huge contract and after he started running behind only one HOF (Walter Jones is a first ballot and Hutch will make it) his number dissappeared. He got soft after the contract Opeth, that is what NW folks are saying. I like the Hawks, have since I moved up here and the realignment. And most people here wanted him cut after he finally went on IR last year M. Morris had several solid games behind the same line.
And inregards to the roster arguement being week, which RB would you cut to sign SA? I assume Pittman is gone already and we'd still have 5 RB before signing SA
August 20, 2008
2:48 PM
BigSmoove15 writes:
There is no risk in bringing in Shaun for 1 year. I dont think Selvin is the answer and Hall is a every once in a while big play runner. Reminds me of Bell... both of them. Note to Shanahan: how about drafting a running back in the first or second round.
August 20, 2008
5:13 PM
OPETH72 writes:
Even if you are right, and it seems pointless to keep arguing over the same point, and he is soft, what harm is there bringing him in? Why are so many scared of him just getting in on the competition? If he is what you say, he wouldn't make it anyway. If he is SO bad as you all say, he won't get on the field much. And if his character is bad, I doubt this story ever becomes even close to reality. However, if he is looking to get back on the money train somewhere, why not start it in Denver? I am only looking at one year, unless he did something ridiculous such as getting 2K yards. Hell even 2K all purpose yards. And I thought I explained the roster spot. Put Torain on IR. You don't have to cut someone of a particular position in order to sign one of that same position. So please stop asking me which running back we have to cut. The answer is simply, none.
August 20, 2008
8:25 PM
dadc43 writes:
The harm for thoso ewho do not believe we should bring him in is when Alexander proves he still has something left and does well thay have to admit they are full of it. Notice they say after he got the big contract, they forget he also got injured allot bcasue his o-lien fell apart. Oh by the way in 02 there was no nuthc and yet Alexnadser had over 1200 ayrds rushing almost 500 recieving and over 16 tds with one HOF lineman. Also remeber in 06 once he came back he avg over 90 ypg which woudl ahve been over 1400 for the year adn still doing it on a broken foot. Also remember in 07 he was av g90 ypg adn 4.4 ypc the first 3 on pace for over 1400 adn over 16 tds until the bruised ribs, twisted knee and ankle oh and broken wrist. AS to selfish once again Junk a selfish player does not play on a borken foot, especailly when he has already been paid. SO sorry the facts show he is far from selfish adn has allot left. I woudl sign him. AS to me calling some of you haters it has nothing to do with the SB it has to do with you factless or misleading hatred towards Alexander not the SB. The facts and your owns owrds show you to be haters, adn worse haters that have no clue.
August 20, 2008
8:28 PM
dadc43 writes:
For clarification there was no Hutch on 02 as he was injured and Alexnader still put up top 10 numbers. However asking any RB to put up decent numbers behind an o-line ranked in the bottom 4 2 years in a row and ptrying to do so injured is asking to much and anyone who does not see this is just a waste.
August 20, 2008
8:58 PM
Terry Tucker writes:
I think he would be a great addition to the team, at least someone who could push the younger player's. I believe he has plenty left to prove another 1500 yard 10 touchdown season wouldnt be out of the question behind that O-line. Shannahan is known as a running back guru if anyone can get 100% out of a RB its him, Ala Terrell Davis, Olandis Gary, Mike Anderson, Clinton Portis,Except for Terrell (injury sorry man we Bronco fans miss you!) What have they done since leaving? NADA The only one that has is Clinton Portis, but he was known as a good back coming out of college none of the other's were and I mean none.
So why not bring in a proven veteran who as we all know can run let him either prove theres nothing left or prove he can still get it done!
August 20, 2008
9:56 PM
DCBronco writes:
Let's bring in some more veteran receivers. Then get some veteran linemen. Get a veteran kicker and punter. Start Ramsey. Running back is the easiest position to adjust to out of college. The backs are fine, let them develop. We don't need a old running back. I liked M. Anderson, O. Gary and R. Droughns. All did well in Denver's system with little experience. I think Pittman is on those backs level level, but I believe Hall, Young, Torain and Alridge have superior talent. Pittman won't even make the team.
August 20, 2008
11:01 PM
Randy Humphreys writes:
I'm another Bronco fan living in the Pacific Northwest. I agree with most of my fellow Northwesterners who say the Broncos are better off without Shaun. Here are the reasons why:
1. He's old (over 30). Only a few of the very best backs perform at that age.
2. He can't catch passes. Check out film of all of his drops.
3. He can't block. Do you want a guy who ducks blitzing linebackers protecting your franchise QB?I think Mike Shanahan knows better.
4. He's a nice guy and a good person, but he lacks the toughness on the football field that you want. He'll duck away from the hit instead of going for the extra inches that will get the first down.
5. His other draft failures aside, does anybody else have a better nose for running backs than Mike Shanahan? Any RB on the roster is better at this point.
6. Shaun hasn't lost a step. He's lost two steps!
7. The Seahawk's line went from phenomenal in '05 to average the last two years. But Mo Morris averaged more yards per carry. What does that tell you?
Don't kid yourself, guys. Shaun was a great runner in his day, but never a great all-around running back. He's not even a good ballcarrier anymore. Yes, there is a reason nobody's signed him. It's because he needs to retire.
August 21, 2008
6:32 PM
dadc43 writes:
The hawks o-line wnet form 6th in 05 to 28th in 06 adn 29th in 07 sorry that is not average that is putrid. Mo MOrris got 85% of his yards on draws and run plays when we were in passing situations. When you check all his drops also check all his catches adn his reception % you will find it is amongst the top 10 of starting RBs. as to blcoking yes pleas elook at the last 2 years since he has only given up 1 sack in 2 years. AS to taking the hit or not he does when it matters, for first downs or tds. But like LT adn most great RBs do not when it does not matter. The Broncos would do well to sign him. It is to bad Alexander ended up in Seattle if he goes anyplace were there is not a coach who is all about the QB and ensuring the QB gets all the attention even at the expence of others and does not waste 3 years to recognize what he has Alexander would have been even better.
August 21, 2008
6:34 PM
dadc43 writes:
The funny thing is the Dallas fans said all of this about Jones and yet most of these people comming on here saying alexander is washed up think JOne sis the 2nd comming. I mean he sure did great behind the top 10 ranked o-line in dallas. 3,5 ypc the same as a broken wristed, bruised ribs, twisted ankle and Knee Alexander did but behind a bottom 4 o-line.
August 21, 2008
10:54 PM
Michael writes:
Well I am also a Denver fan here in the PNW. I would agree that bringing in Shaun Alexander would be a good move. Despite what some say he still has gas left, and something to prove. From all accounts he is healthy for the first time in 2 years, and is in great shape, and unlike what he has had to deal with on the Hawks the past 2 years the Broncos have a good o-line. He would do very well with the Broncos.
August 22, 2008
7:02 PM
Anthony writes:
Well I am with Michael and Dadc43. I am in the Seattle area and a Broncos fan and think Alexander would be a huge pick up for us. He has plenty left in the tank and could be a steal.
August 23, 2008
11:06 AM
culi mac writes:
LOOK ITS THIS SIMPLE.. WHEN YOU ARE WASHED UP YOUR WASHED UP!! NFL RB'Z SHELF LIFE IS BOUT 4 OR 5 YEARS ( SEE TERRELL DAVIS ) & HE'S NO T.D.!!
August 23, 2008
11:06 AM
culi mac writes:
LOOK ITS THIS SIMPLE.. WHEN YOU ARE WASHED UP YOUR WASHED UP!! NFL RB'Z SHELF LIFE IS BOUT 4 OR 5 YEARS ( SEE TERRELL DAVIS ) & HE'S NO T.D.!!
August 23, 2008
12:14 PM
Jeremy writes:
Washed up you mean like Moss and Lewis were suppose to be right? Everyone said they were washed up and look both are playing great. I agree with those who think it would be a good move, with little down side. You sign him to an incentive layden contract and if it does not work you cut him. It is a no brainer. You are right he is no TD but then again TD is no Alexnader either. They both have had geat careers and are different kind of backs. But back to the subject it would be a great move and this is comming from a Broncos fan.
August 23, 2008
6:33 PM
Culi Mac writes:
Moss, Lewis who? if you are talking about Randy Moss he doesn't count because he's a receiver(plus nobody on earth but you thought he was washed up anyway!!) .. & i asume your talking about jamal lewis, & when people started to doubt him he still looked as if he had way more burst & passion for the game opposed to alexander.. he couldn't carry T.D.'Z jocc strap!! don't get me wrong he was very talented, but there's still the issue of 2 super bowl rings to alexanders 0.. one was a franchise bacc & one changed the history..
August 24, 2008
11:43 AM
Jeremy writes:
Really Hmm ESPN at one time Said MOss was washed up, so did sportsline so it was not just me. AS to Lewis people doubted him becasue he could not get the job done period. your opinon he had more passion and burst is just that an opinion. One that I and others would not share. As to carrying TDs jock well to be honest that would be wrong. Lets see other than SB which is just as much about the team as any one player what else does TD have:
Alexander avg 1200 ypg over his career Td only 1100.
Alexander avg 190 ypg recieving td only 182.
Alexander avg 14 tds a season TD 9.
Sorry that sure sounds like Alexander is right there with TD.
TD was a franchise back and great one however so was Alexander who also changed history, one of only 2 backs adn was the first with 5 straight years of 15+ tds. Holds record for most gamee in a row with a run of 10+ yards. One of only 2 backs with back to back 20+ td seasons and Alexander was the first. Most rushing yards in a half, most TDs in a half adn of course there is more. Agian TD is great and so is/was Alexander.
August 24, 2008
11:48 AM
Anthony writes:
Well as much as I love TD and think he is great, I am sorry but Alexander is definately in the conversation with TD. And I am sorry but Jeremy is right about Lewis and Moss they were both thought of as done. as was several others who came back. As to passion Alexander still has it that is why he is working out and staying in shape, that is why he played with all of his injuries over the last 2 years. So Culi you are way off on this one.
August 27, 2008
6:41 PM
Roddy writes:
I lived just outside of Seattle, watched many Seahawks games, and it is unbelievable to me that teams aren't interested in Alexander. There have to be a couple coaches out there who are able to break out of the "group-think" and recognize that Shaun is better than at least half the starting RBs in the NFL.
Shaun would be a great fit in Denver