November 10, 2008 5:19 PM
The cases for and against Gary Smith
As the Rapids, by all accounts, prepare to announce Gary Smith as their next full-time coach on Tuesday afternoon, let's look at the arguments for and against hiring the man who turned around Fernando Clavijo's team but narrowly missed the MLS playoffs.
THE ARGUMENTS FOR SMITH
Smith improved the team, plain and simple. He took a team that was foundering at 6-10-3 and collected 17 points in 11 games to finish the season.
He raised the bar for the team's performance on the road. Clavijo's Rapids were 1-6-2 away from Dick's Sporting Goods Park in 2008; Smith's Rapids won three of their six road games and fought their way into a position to qualify for the playoffs. The Rapids won 2-1 against Chivas USA at the Home Depot Center to set up a winner-take-all match against Real Salt Lake.
Smith elevated the play on the field. In contrast to Clavijo, whose laissez-faire reactions after losses were always annoying to me, Smith's eyes are full of fire on the sideline. Smith is better at motivating his players, preparing them to give a complete effort on the field. Here's what Marcelo Balboa said about Smith during an Altitude telecast of the Oct. 19 game against Chivas: "He's had success. He's turned this team around. They're fighters. They're more organized. The players know their roles."
Smith got the most out of Conor Casey. Smith stuck with the Clavijo rotation of Casey, Tom McManus and Omar Cummings, but it was Casey who caught fire from the beginning. With Clavijo out of the country to tend to an ailing relative, Casey scored twice in a mid-August victory against Kansas City
Smith apparently has the support of much of the team. It's easy to wonder what's going on in the minds of Bouna Coundoul, Facundo Erpen and Christian Gomez, who were spectators for some (or much, or all) of the stretch run. But defender Mike Petke and others have been vocal in their support of Smith and their desire for him to be hired full time.
And, although potential assistant coach Steve Guppy and the Rochester Rhinos have had loose lips in the past few days, Smith seems to have adhered to the Rapids' wishes and kept quiet about the hiring. That's a good thing (and the front office must agree). Smith can keep a secret when he needs to.
THE ARGUMENT AGAINST SMITH
Yura Movsisyan, 90th minute, Oct. 25.
So where does all this leave us? Well, it looks pretty lopsided in the "arguments for" column, although that "argument against" hurts like a punch in the gut. The 1-1 tie that felt like a loss kept the Rapids out of the playoffs and let RSL retain the Rocky Mountain Cup.
But here's my real question about Smith: What happens to the roster? We've seen what he can do with Clavijo's players. What will he do when he has more control over his personnel?
If a new coach came to town, surely he would seek to make his mark on the roster. But what does Smith do with Bouna, Gomez and Erpen? Does he ask Pablo to stay? Or does he gut the team, like the outsider might.
In 2005, under Tom Hankinson, these players were some of the mainstays on the field: Jeff Cunningham, Peguero Jean-Philippe, Alain Nkong, Terry Cooke, Eric Denton, Kyle Beckerman, Pablo Mastroeni, Mike Petke, Ritchie Kotschau, Nat Borchers, Hunter Freeman and Joe Cannon.
By the end of 2007, all were gone but Cooke, Pablo and Petke.
That's the way it goes in professional soccer. Will Smith do the same? Only time will tell. But such turnover is not good for the team or the ticket holders. Just as we're getting to know players like Luchi Gonzales and Fabrice Noel and Freeman ... they're gone.
My hunch is that Smith, having become familiar with the skills of the 2008 Colorado Rapids, would retain more of the players who already are in uniform than an outsider would.
And that stability would become a plus for the franchise and the fans.
We had about one-third of the season to assess Smith's fitness as coach of the Rapids. With his team's performance in those 11 games and the possibility of greater stability among the coaches and players, Smith deserves a chance to coach this team.





November 11, 2008
6:38 AM
Bonji writes:
Another negative is Smith's lack of experience in the MLS draft and in working with the league's player acquisition rules. If he is appointed I expect a longer learning curve then with a Spencer or Mariner or other MLS assistant coach with experience.
Timing of the announcement is curious; 2 days after Houston crashed out of the playoffs...
November 11, 2008
8:23 AM
Jason writes:
1 note, Clavijo was coach in 2005, Hankinson's last year was 2004.
2 other negatives against Smith:
1. 2 points in the last 3 home games
2. His tendency to sit on a 1 goal lead instead of going for the jugular. See the late games against NY, New England, and FSL for examples.
November 11, 2008
11:39 AM
Bonji writes:
If you guys are headed to the presser, be sure to Twitter some updates from your mobile.
November 11, 2008
5:01 PM
George Tanner writes:
you're absolutely right. good catch. but the argument remains true: in 2004, the mainstays on the team were pedro, henderson, chung, spencer, matt crawford, borchers, antonio de la torre, beckerman, trembly, kotschau, cannon and pablo. two years later? almost all of them gone.
November 11, 2008
8:33 PM
Matt W writes:
Sitting on one goals leads seems to be the make of English soccer, which might be ok in the EPL but not in the MLS. Playing prevent defense usually provides a tie or prevents a win. I never know why coaches do this or why teams do it.
I made the contention all year the the Rapids talent level was about average and that a change of coach would get things moving in the right direction. I think Gary did this, now the question is how will he evaluate talent to take the Rapids to the next level
Regards,
Dream of the MLS Playoffs in Denver
www.peleorei.com
November 12, 2008
9:07 AM
Jay Five writes:
Pablo is sticking around and I bet Bouna will be back in form by next season.
I think Gomez and Erpen will move on. It will be intersting to see what adjustments Smith makes with that room.
November 12, 2008
9:56 PM
Mike writes:
George, I'm curious if Pablo's decision to re-sign was based on Smith geting the head coaching position. Any idea if that's true?
November 17, 2008
5:27 PM
George Tanner writes:
mike:
as the rocky's pat rooney reported, pablo is staying because of two things: his rapport with the coach and the heightened level of play and expectations that smith created in his short time with the team.
read rooney's whole story here:
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/nov/11/rapids-set-name-new-coach/