- It’s open enrollment time: Could consumer-driven health plans be the right choice for you?
- Rural Revitalization or deeper distress?
- No more ‘Mr. Nice Guv’
- In Pakistan, or U.S., lawyers make a stand
- First lesson in Disability 101: Treat me like a regular person -- because I am
- A few questions about abortion
- GUEST COLUMNIST: A new Russia emerges
- Returning veterans need support
- The harsh realities of global warming
- School choice the objective solution
New system would eliminate costly runoff elections
By Rep. John Kefalas, Rick VanWie and Julie Connor
Election Day is an important hallmark of freedom. Our democracy and our cities, counties and state are strengthened by the electorate expressing its will at the voting booth.
However, even this centerpiece of American liberty needs to be occasionally evaluated. Our elected officials should always be looking at ways to make voting more meaningful and effective while reducing costs to the taxpayers.
The recent elections in Denver point to the need for reform. Between the November 2006 election and the May 1, 2007, election, Denver citizens were asked to cast ballots three times. Additionally, in three City Council districts, electors will be asked to vote again in a runoff round.
Each of these elections costs the taxpayers money, while at the same time voter turnout decreases with each round.
One way to fix this problem is an advanced voting system called Instant Runoff Voting. With IRV there is no need for a second election.
IRV is easy for voters to use. Instead of only selecting one candidate in a contest where there are three or more candidates, the electors may rank them in order of preference. Tthe votes are tabulated, if any one candidate gets more than 50 percent of the vote, that person is declared the winner. If there is no majority winner, then the candidate who received the fewest votes is eliminated. For all of the electors who voted for the eliminated candidate as their first choice, their second choice is counted. This process guarantees a majority winner without a runoff, while still ensuring “one person, one vote.”
In partisan contests it can help prevent the “spoiler” effect when a third-party or unaffiliated candidate is running. IRV will allow such contenders to enrich the marketplace of ideas while addressing the “spoiler” effect.
Here in Colorado, a major effort to investigate how IRV and other advanced voting methods could be applied is about to begin. The 11-member, multipartisan Voter Choice Interim Task Force, chaired by Rep. John Kefalas
Advanced voting methods can save taxpayer money and promote greater voter participation because they enfranchise voters by allowing them opportunities to vote their values and conscience. State and local governments across the U.S. are either studying advanced voting methods or adopting them, specifically IRV. Colorado is now part of this movement.
- It’s open enrollment time: Could consumer-driven health plans be the right choice for you?
- Rural Revitalization or deeper distress?
- No more ‘Mr. Nice Guv’
- In Pakistan, or U.S., lawyers make a stand
- First lesson in Disability 101: Treat me like a regular person -- because I am
- A few questions about abortion
- GUEST COLUMNIST: A new Russia emerges
- Returning veterans need support