- Founders' genius: leave power widely dispersed
- GUEST COLUMN: Organizing state workers/'Disastrous' scheme
- GUEST COLUMN: Organizing state workers/Partnership best for all
- $2.57 a day buys food, perspective/'Food Stamp Challenge' a catalyst for personal change
- Museum no boon to Civic Center Park
- Six years after 9/11
- David Iglesias: Long on ego but short on ability
- ACLU, atheists forcing their “beliefs” on us
- Playing with fire
- The cost of enforcement
David Iglesias: Long on ego but short on ability
This Speakout has not been edited.
By John Dendahl
Is he an idiot, as U.S. Rep. Chris Cannon (R-Utah) has said? Well, the former U.S. Attorney for New Mexico, David Iglesias, is certainly on an ego trip, and ego drives people to do and say idiotic things.
I was David Iglesias’ friend for many years, including six or so while serving as state chairman of his political party, Republicans. Our team tried hard to get him elected state attorney general in 1998. He was at times an impressive campaigner and, though a considerable underdog, he came close to winning.
Many of the same team, including me, were later his advocates for a 2001 appointment as U.S. Attorney. However, some who had by then observed Iglesias’ performance as a lawyer warned that he didn’t have the stuff for that crucial position. Unfortunately, they were right and he had to be removed.
Iglesias has revealed an abysmal lack of class no one predicted. In addition to his high-profile whining, he violated Rule 1-8.010 governing U.S. Attorneys by failing to report conversations with Members of Congress, then unjustly accusing them of political interference.
With his looks and glibness on-camera, Iglesias is a right-out-of-central-casting puppet for a group — the Democratic Party leadership in the U.S. Congress — whose Grail is partisan dominance.
He told a reporter for The Washington Post, “I’ve seen how Democrats have really reached out and helped me ... The people who stuck it to me are people who share [the same values]. The people who have helped me — the Schumers, the Leahys, the Feinsteins — have value systems different than mine.”¹
The words of an idiot. Democrat U.S. Senators Charlie Schumer, Patrick Leahy, Dianne Feinstein, etc. have gleefully seized upon a naive egoist to help themselves. The eagerness of this self-pitying turncoat to pummel their political enemies must feel to them like Christmas every day.
Egoist? For sure. Here he is in the same Post article on his media stardom skewering his ex-friends: “I’ve loved it. It’s a good fit. It feels really natural. I’ll tell you what, from an exposure point of view it’s been incredible. Had I stayed a U.S. attorney and not gotten forced to resign, no one would know who I was outside of New Mexico. In a perverse way this has already put me on the national map. My own test is: If it’s a show I’ve heard of, I’ll probably do it.”²
“Perverse” was a fine word choice.
There’s even more for the fiercely partisan Schumer and Co. to appreciate. One of Iglesias’ critics’ beefs was his failure to address seriously an infamous Democrat tool, ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), and others for flagrant voter fraud laid before him by the New Mexico press.
Iglesias wants us to believe he was competent but insufficiently partisan. Rubbish. President Bush didn’t replace him with a “partisan” prosecutor sure to go after ACORN and other public corruption cases. His successor is Larry Gómez, his assistant, ominously a man many associate with Iglesias’ failures.
During his 1998 campaign, Iglesias told a New Mexico reporter that he stood with the “Christian right” on all issues but one: affirmative action. “I cannot toe the party line there. I would be the biggest hypocrite in the world if I said I hadn’t benefitted from that,” he told the reporter.³
Indeed. And affirmative action also lay beneath the later appointment he couldn’t handle, U.S. Attorney. One wonders whether it also influenced the glowing performance reviews Iglesias likes to claim.
To be fair, Iglesias’ performance was sometimes fine. I warmly applauded a road show he performed in support of the Patriot Act, for example. Someone had prepared a PowerPoint presentation with excellent material and he supported it well while speaking and taking questions, albeit from a friendly Republican audience.
But a U.S. Attorney must bring to the table talent quite different from that of a good press secretary, campaigner or media hound. Sadly, Iglesias didn’t have it.
Lastly there’s an issue of honesty. Iglesias was one of several Navy lawyers involved in the courts martial glorified in the movie, A Few Good Men. Campaigning in 1998, Iglesias claimed he was Tom Cruise’s character. Just a little exaggeration? White lie, maybe? Nine years later, press accounts of Iglesias’ failure and firing continue to mention his Cruise-plays-Iglesias story as if it were fact. An honest man would stop this spreading lie; a pusillanimous egoist just smiles — like David Iglesias.
John Dendahl is a retired businessman and served as chairman of the Republican Party of New Mexico from December 1994 to May 2003. He and his wife Jackie now live near Denver.
1. Pappu, Sridhar. “The Next Best Path.” The Washington Post. May 22, 2007. p. C01.
2. Ibid.
3. Plevin, Nancy. “Iglesias, Madrid square off in attorney general’s race.” The Santa Fe New Mexican. September 29, 1998. p. A-1.
Froward, you're inventing history. Hitler became the Nazi propaganda boss within months of the party's creation, and he became its leader in 1921, just two years after the party was founded. He didn't hijack the National Socialists: he gave them their direction and their identity.
The things you say make It tough to believe you've actually read much about the Nazis. If your posts are any indication, it's safe to say that NOT knowing history will turn you Democrat. People who are obstinate in their ignorance think anybody who disagrees with them is a selfish racist.
Posted by Dan on September 17, 2007 01:10 PMAnd another thing the socialist party in Germany was hijacked by Hitler. whereas he and his henchman changed that party's ideals. beyond the names given actually look at the philosophy's and witch ones are similar.
Posted by Froward on September 17, 2007 11:36 AMok ok ok actually read mein kamph then read the republican party ideals... they agree with each other. actually knowing history, as to where that philosophy went. and what it did to people. will turn you Democrat. If not you are selfish, stubborn, racist and a waste of oxygen.
Posted by Froward on September 17, 2007 11:31 AMFroward, it was actually a socialist -- a national socialist -- who wrote Mein Kampf. The distinction between the Commies and the Nazis is largely a product of their propagandists' imagination. Freidrich Hayek, the great economist, showed that the Nazis are socialist in essence, not just in name.
Posted by Dan on September 17, 2007 10:21 AMFroward, it was actually a socialist -- a national socialist -- who wrote Mein Kampf. The distinction between the Commies and the Nazis is largely a product of their propagandists' imagination. Freidrich Hayek, the great economist, showed that the Nazis are socialist in essence, not just in name.
Posted by Dan on September 17, 2007 10:20 AMAnd so you compare Reps to Nazis because
#1. They are biased towards their party and
#2. They fight wars to "defend their homeland"?
well I can say that with your first point you claim a lot of Dems to be Nazis and a lot of Reps to be stereotyped. On the second point taking out Jews vs. Taking out Al Khida (Totally butchered spelling but doesn't defeat the point) are two totally different things.
Posted by Chris on September 17, 2007 08:03 AMI believe knowledgeable persons would agree with me. remember it was a neocon who wrote mein kamph! the same neocon invaded countries "to defend the homeland" or for that time the fatherland.
Posted by Froward on September 17, 2007 06:59 AMActually, Froward, US Attornies are not supposed to be non-partisan. They serve at the pleasure of the President, which means that they're expected to make the President's priorities their own.
You do a disservice to everybody, especially Democrats, when you make such mean, ill-informed comparisons between Republicans and Nazis. How do you expect an educated person to take you seriously?
Posted by Dan on September 16, 2007 11:27 PMSo a U.S. Attorney must be lockstep with every party directive? or are U.S. Attorneys supposed to be non partisan? I think the latter. Unlike republicans who feel we need a one party system. like communists or Nazis, republicans only!
Posted by Froward on September 16, 2007 01:46 PM
- Founders' genius: leave power widely dispersed
- GUEST COLUMN: Organizing state workers/'Disastrous' scheme
- GUEST COLUMN: Organizing state workers/Partnership best for all
- $2.57 a day buys food, perspective/'Food Stamp Challenge' a catalyst for personal change
- Museum no boon to Civic Center Park
- Six years after 9/11
- David Iglesias: Long on ego but short on ability
- ACLU, atheists forcing their “beliefs” on us